Guardian Angels Health & Rehab Center
1500 East Third Avenue, Hibbing, MN 55746 · Non profit - Corporation · 65 certified beds · (218) 231-8100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $26,481 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-12)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.6% | 18.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.1% | 4.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.7% | 1.9% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 2.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 4.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.1% | 4.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.0% | 20.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.9% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 5.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.9% | 24.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.1% | 17.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 82.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.4% | 23.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 21.1% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.6%CMS range 37.6–71.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 6.6–18.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.78 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 50.1 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to safely use a toileting sling per manufacture's recommendations to transfer 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) when R1 fell from a mechanical lift, sustaining subarachnoid and subdural bleeds (brain bleeds) that required a hospital admission. The IJ began on 7/25/24 at 4:10 p.m., when R1 fell from a mechanical lift. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were informed of the IJ on 7/31/24 at 4:27 p.m. The facility had implemented corrective action on 7/26/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet, undated, indicated R1 had diagnoses of hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, abnormal involuntary movements, epilepsy, and malignant neoplasm of frontal lobe. R1's care plan reviewed 7/24/24, indicated R1 needed total assist of two staff with a mechanical lift for transfers using a medium toileting sling. On 7/25/24 at 7:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-11-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided according to the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pain management. This deficient practice caused actual harm for R1, who experienced unmanaged severe pain, disturbed sleep and needed two doses of his narcotic medication to receive pain control. The facility implemented immediate corrective action, prior to the survey and was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet dated 10/15/24, identified R1 had diagnoses of chronic pain syndrome. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 was cognitively intact, had pain, and used as needed pain medications. R1's care plan dated 10/24/24 indicated R1 was at risk for pain, and directed staff to administer medications as ordered. Non-pharmacological interventions were identified to apply cold or heat to area of R1's pain or offer to repositioning. R1's Provider Orders dated 10/15/24 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess, monitor and respond to signs of stroke like symptoms for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for change of condition. The facility's failures caused an excessive delay of medical diagnoses, management, and treatment of R1's condition which resulted in actual harm to R1. Findings include R1's Face Sheet identified R1 had diagnosis of Parkinson's disease R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. Required assist of one for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and assist of two for transferring. R1's care plan dated 1/30/22, identified R1 required assist to safely transfer from one surface to another and staff were to monitor for changes in abilities. R1's medication administration record (MAR) dated 9/8/23 identified R1's medications were administered at 5:31 a.m. and 9:03 a.m. and a tylenol dose at 10:00:37 a.m. Email communication on 9/8/23 at 9:45 a.m., from family member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor fluid intake and daily weights for 1 of 3 resident (R10) reviewed for hydration. R10 sustained harm when admitted to the hospital for exacerbation of congestive heart failure and increased edema caused by facilities lack of monitoring residents physician ordered fluid restriction. In addition, the facility failed to have a process for monitoring bowel status for 2 of 5 residents (R6, R19) and provide medical monitoring per physician orders for 1 of 5 residents (R4) reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: Findings include: R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R10 had no shortness of breath laying flat, sitting up at rest or with minimal exertion, acute on chronic systolic heart failure (a disease where the heart muscle weakens causing fluid to back up into the lungs suddenly and quickly from the left side of the heart), Cor Pulmonale -chronic ( process where fluid builds up on the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure supply and administration of ordered medications for 3 of 3 resident (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for pharmacy services.Findings include: R1 R1's Face Sheet dated 3/9/25, identified R1 had diagnoses of lower back pain, arthritis, and pain in left hip. R1's care plan revised on 3/16/25, identified R1 had chronic pain and instructed staff to administer medications per provider orders. R1's medication administration record (MAR) dated 8/2025, identified R1 had orders for oxycodone (a prescription medicine used to treat moderate to severe pain) 10mg twice daily for pain. The MAR lacked documentation R1 received ordered medications on 8/9/25 at 8:00 p.m., through 8/11/25 at 8:00 a.m. R1's progress note dated 8/8/25 at 8:43 p.m., identified R1's medical provider (MD)-A was called on 8/8/25 at 5:00 p.m., regarding R1's oxycodone 10mg pain medication needing a new order. MD-A indicated he would take care of it. On 8/9/25 at 6:12 a.m., a progress note identified R1's oxycodone never arrived from the pharmacy. On 8/10/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient numbers of staff to ensure all resident cares including activities of daily living (ADLs), toileting program/schedules, and check and changes, were completed timely for 4 of 5 residents (R1, R64, R16, R9), residents food requests were acted upon for 1 of 10 residents (R218), and residents were properly supervised during medication administration for 1 of 2 residents (R40). This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Staff and Family Interviews/Observation: During an interview on 6/9/25 at 2:37 p.m., family members (FM)-A, B, C, stated on 5/28/25, when R40 returned from the hospital at 2:00 p.m., no one checked on R40. At 9:00 p.m., (seven hours later)FM-A went to the nurses station to get help. FM-A stated no one could figure out how to connect the alarm pad that would turn on the call light if R40 got up without help. FM-A said she didn't feel safe leaving so…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food and beverages were monitored for safe food temperatures. This had the potential to effect all residents in the facility. Findings include: During observation on 6/11/25 at 10:37 a.m., residents observed sitting in the dining room waiting for brunch meal. Beverage cart positioned by serving area of kitchenette and contained these items in a plastic tub: apple juice carton, cranberry juice carton, orange juice carton, ice water pitcher, milk in half gallon plastic carton. Tub did not contain any ice cubes or cooling device. All residents on units [NAME] Woodland and [NAME] were served beverages from this cart. On 6/11/25 at 11:28 a.m., dietary aide (DA)-A prepared to take beverage cart back to kitchen. DA-A prompted to pour a glass of milk and to check the temperature. DA-A retrieved thermometer from kitchenette, and poured a glass of milk. Milk measured to be 44.5 degrees Fahrenheit (F). DA-A stated the milk was above the guidelines for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure cleaning and sanitization of surfaces for 1 of 1 resident (R59) reviewed for infection control. In addition, the facility failed to ensure proper handling of laundry to avoid contamination in the laundry area, and failed to have an active water management program. These deficient practices had the potential to impact all residents residing at the facility. R59: R59's re-entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R59 was cognitively intact with the diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, resistance to vancomycin, and congestive heart failure. During a continuous observation on 6/10/25, at 9:01 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN-A) parked their cart outside of R59's room, donned PPE and entered R59's room. Signs on the door indicated R59 was in isolation with droplet precautions. LPN-A exited R59's room with a nasal swab, put swab in tube, discarded swab and put specimen tube in tray holder on the middle of the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure there was an active antibiotic stewardship program and that antibiotic time-outs were performed for 3 of 5 residents (R28, R48, R218) reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings include: R28: R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and diagnoses of Alzheimer's dementia and depression. R28's medical record reflected she was tested for COVID after developing respiratory symptoms on 5/23/25, and that result was negative. The facility then obtained orders for a respiratory panel for R28, which resulted negative for influenza, RSV, and COVID. R28's provider order dated 6/3/25, identified an order for azithromycin (a broad-spectrum antibiotic) 250 milligrams (mg) for five days for an upper respiratory infection. R28's medical record didn't contain an antibiotic time-out. R48: R48's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified moderately impaired cognition and diagnoses of urinary tract infection (UTI), chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R28: R28's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated R28 was severely cognitively impaired with the diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, depression, psychotic disorder, and hallucinations. Section N. Medications indicated R28 received antipsychotic medications. R28's Care plan last revised 3/26/25, indicated R28 received antipsychotic medications and instructed AIMS assessments to be completed per policy. R28's Order Summary Active orders as of 6/18/25, contained the following orders: ---Seroquel 50 mg tablet at bedtime for Alzheimer and delusion disorder ---Seroquel 25 MG tablet give 1.5 tablet by mouth in the morning related to Alzheimer and delusional disorder. ---Observe closely for side effects of Antipsychotic medication including dry mouth, constipation, blurred vision, disorientation or confusion, difficulty urinating, hypotension, dark urine, yellow skin, nausea or vomiting, lethargy, drooling, EPS symptoms (tremors, disturbed gait, increased agitation, restlessness, involuntary movement of mouth or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for 4 of 5 residents (R1, R64, R16, R9). Findings include: R1: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had diagnoses which included dementia, anxiety, heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), insomnia, and macular degeneration (an eye disease that causes vision loss). In addition, R1's MDS identified she required substantial to maximum assistance with ADLs, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was at risk for pressure ulcers. According to R1's MDS she had no rejections of care. R1's care plan dated 3/9/25, identified R1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia. Interventions included I like my nails trimmed and cleaned during my bath, preferred bathing twice a week in the afternoon. R1's care plan dated 4/22/25, identified R1 was at risk for bladder incontinence and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to track bowel movements and provide related interventions for 2 of 4 residents (R9, R32), failed to monitor a resident's oxygen saturation levels per provider order for 1 of 4 residents (R9), and failed to complete ordered skin checks for a resident with a skin condition for 1 of 4 residents (R22) reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: R9: R9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated cognitive patterns weren't assessed. R9's MDS included diagnoses of pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, acute cystitis, orthopedic aftercare, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, and dementia. R9 had limited range of motion in both upper extremities, one lower extremity, needed assistance with ADLs, and had an indwelling catheter. R9's care plan dated 5/22/25, didn't address oxygen or bowels. R9's provider orders identified the following: -4/13/25, an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications and biologics stored in the medication room were safely secured to prevent resident access and diversion. In addition, the facility failed to ensure safe refrigeration temperatures were maintained for medications requiring refrigeration. These unsafe practices had the potential to impact residents who received medication from the 200s/300s medication fridge and or could gain access to the mediation room. Findings include: A review of the medication room located at the intersection of the 200 and 300s hallways was completed on 6/11/25 at 3:39 p.m., with RN-B and RN-C. Some storage cupboards had locks but were not locked, and some cupboards did not have locks. Stock meds were stored in a lockable cupboard that was not locked. Three bins of medications were stored in a lower cupboard without a lock. The cupboard was labeled medications for destruction. The medication fridge was locked. RN-B unlocked the fridge and confirmed the fridge internal temperature was 48 degrees Fahrenheit. RN-B stated 48…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to provide a requested second helping of food for 1 of 10 residents (R218) reviewed for dining. Findings include: R218's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R218 had diagnoses which included heart disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, no concerns with swallowing or oral/dental concerns. In addition, R218's MDS identified she was moderately cognitively intact. R218's care plan dated 3/21/25, identified R218 had a potential for alteration in nutrition due to leaving 25 % or more food uneaten at meals. Interventions included to monitor food and fluid intake, to offer fluids and snacks. On 6/9/25 at 3:39 p.m., R25 said there was sometimes not enough food during a meal. On 6/9/25 at 4:19 p.m., R218 said didn't always like the choices for food. On 6/11/25 at 11:00 a.m., in the [NAME] Woodlyn and [NAME] dining room R38 asked a nursing assistant (NA)-C for more and pointed to a black bowl. R38 was told I don't think we have any more of that. The NA-C did not go to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident did not self-administer medications (SAM) as assessed and according to the care plan for 2 of 2 residents (R40, R219) reviewed for SAM. Findings include: R40: R40's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R40 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD [a group of lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe]), mild cognitive impairment, and supraventricular tachycardia (a faster than normal heart rate beginning above the heart's two lower chambers). In addition, R40 required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living. R40 had no rejections of care. R40's Order Summary Report current as of 6/12/25, identified R40 had orders for ipratropium-albuterol (used to treat COPD by opening the airways and reducing inflammation) inhalation solution 0.5-2.5 (3) milligrams per 3 milliliters one vial inhale orally three times a day dated 6/10/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure timely reveiw and revision of the care plan occured for 2of 2 residents (R41, R11) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R41: R41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R41 was moderately cognitively impaired with the diagnoses of stroke, dysphagia, generalized muscle weakness, and epilepsy. MDS Section GG indicated R41 was dependent for activities of daily living and transfers. R41's Care plan last revised 6/3/25, identified R41 as a risk for falls on 3/19/25. The care plan lacked evidence to show R41's fall prevention interventions had been revised before or after R41's fall on 6/7/25. A nursing note entry made on 6/7/25, identified R41 had been placed in their recliner and then was later found on the floor. Post assessment revealed R41 had not sustained a significant injury. A nursing note entry made on 6/10/25, indicated an interdisciplinary disciplinary review had been completed for R41's fall on 6/7/25, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure competent, trained staff operated tube feeding pumps and managed tubing for 1 of 1 resident (R41) reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: R41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R41 was moderately cognitively impaired with the diagnoses of stroke, dysphagia, generalized muscle weakness, and epilepsy. MDS Section GG indicated R41 was dependent for activities of daily living and transfers. MDS Section K. Percent Intake by Artificial Route indicated R41 received 51% or more of nutrition through parenteral or tube feeding. R41's care plan last revised 6/3/25, indicated R41 required tube feeding related to dysphasia and directed staff to use infection control precautions and related techniques following the manufacturer's recommendations when stopping, starting, flushing, and giving medications through the feeding tube. R41's Order Summary Report Active orders as of 6/12/25 included the following orders: -NPO…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were educated on and offered pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations upon admission for 1 of 5 residents (R38) admitted before 3/31/25 and failed to offer and educate on pneumococcal vaccinations for 1 of 5 residents (R59) who were reviewed for vaccinations. Findings include: R38's admission Record identified an admission date of 3/11/25, and diagnoses of and kidney failure, heart disease and urinary tract infection. R38's Immunization Audit Report dated 6/12/25, didn't identify any vaccination history. R59's admission Record identified an admission date of 4/25/25, and diagnoses of status post-kidney transplant, chronic kidney disease, and immunodeficiency. R59's Immunization Audit Report dated 6/12/25, didn't identify any vaccination history. During an interview on 6/11/25 at 3:06 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-F stated the facility did a vaccination reconciliation within 48 hours, it was part of the admit paperwork along with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were educated on and offered COVID-19 vaccinations upon admission for 2 of 5 residents (R38, R59) reviewed for vaccinations. Findings include: R38's admission Record identified an admission date of 3/11/25, and diagnoses of and kidney failure, heart disease and urinary tract infection. R38's Immunization Audit Report dated 6/12/25, didn't identify any vaccination history. R59's admission Record identified an admission date of 4/25/25, and diagnoses of status post-kidney transplant, chronic kidney disease, and immunodeficiency. R59's Immunization Audit Report dated 6/12/25, didn't identify any vaccination history. During an interview on 6/11/25 at 3:06 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-F stated the facility did a vaccination reconciliation within 48 hours, it was part of the admit paperwork along with checking the Minnesota Immunization Information Connection (MIIC) for history. RN-F reviewed R38 and R59's record and confirmed there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were within reach from the bathroom floor in a resident bathroom for 1 of 2 residents (R17) and failed to ensure bathroom call light was in good repair for 1 of 2 residents (R27) reviewed for call light accessibility. Findings include: On 6/9/25 at 3:22 p.m., the bathroom call light for R17 was checked to see if it was in working order. The bathroom call light did not have a cord. On 6/10/25 at 1:30 p.m., the bathroom call light for R27 was checked to see if it was in working order and the cord was found to be frayed in the middle of the red cord, able to see white thread. On 6/11/25 at 1:55 p.m., maintenance (M)-A verified the call light in R27's bathroom was frayed and stated in needed to be replaced because it could break. M-A verified R17 had no call light cord in the bathroom. M-A verified it was a safety concern if a resident fell in the bathroom they would not be able to reach the button on the wall and call for help. During an interview on 6/11/25 at 3:47 p.m., the administrator stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure unauthorized staff, visitors, and residents did not have access to medication storage area. This practice had the potential to affect all residents on the 400 hallway. Findings include During observation on 7/16/24 at 7:18 a.m., the 400 hallway medication storage area doorway was completely open with no staff around the medication storage area or the nurses desk next to the medication storage area. During observation on 7/16/24 at 8:33 a.m. the 400 hallway medication storage area doorway was open and nursing staff were not around the medication storage area. The nurse manager was in her office, next to the medication storage area but had her back facing her door and the medication storage area. During an interview on 7/16/24 at 8:37 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-C confirmed the medication storage room was open and no staff were around except her, with her back facing the medication storage room. RN-C stated it was the responsibility of the nurse working the cart to make sure the medication storage room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document reviewed the facility failed to comprehensively assess and document a resident with a contracture to the right hand. This affected 1 of 3 residents (R8) reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings include: R8's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R8 had minimal cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included bilateral lower extremity amputations, anemia, and renal insufficiency. The MDS also indicated R8 had no functional limitation to range of motion to the upper extremities which included the shoulder, elbow, wrist, or hand. R8's admission assessment dated [DATE], indicated R8 had no impairments to his upper extremity which included the shoulder, elbow, wrist, or hand. During an observation on 7/14/24 at 2:03 p.m., R8 was noted to have a contracture to his right hand and fingers on the right hand. During an interview on 7/14/24 at 2:05 p.m., R8 stated the contracture to his right had and fingers had been there for over 2 years. On 7/16/24 at 1:18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and care plan services for 2 of 3 residents (R162, R8) reviewed for care plan accuracy. Findings include: R162: R162's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected a facility entry date of 7/3/24, identified impaired cognition, diagnoses of lung and colon cancer, and R162 received hospice services. R162's care plan dated 7/3/24, did not include a focus for hospice care and coordination. A document, St. Croix Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Report identified a hospice admission of 2/1/24. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 1:00 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A confirmed R162's care plan did not contain hospice and R162 was on hospice services upon admission on [DATE]. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 1:00 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated she would expect there to be a line item for hospice in the care plan because it was important for coordination of care. A document, Person Centered Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow provider orders for residents requiring weight monitoring for 2 of 4 residents (R42, R33) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R42: R42's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified impaired cognition and diagnoses of Alzheimer's dementia, diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and atherosclerotic heart disease (a condition that causes a narrowing of the arteries). R42's care plan dated 4/17/24, did not address obtaining or assessing resident's weight. R42's provider orders contained an order for weekly weights starting 5/6/24. Review of R42's electronic medical record (EMR), identified no weight entries from 6/28/24 to 7/14/24. During an interview on 7/16/24 at 1:43 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-A stated the nursing aids were responsible for weighing the residents and recording the number on the bath sheet and the nurse will enter that in their chart. During an interview on 7/17/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a rationale was documented for the order of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic (effecting the chemical makeup of the brain) medication beyond 14 days for 1 of 5 residents (R32) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment and had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, displaced fracture of the right femur, and history of breast and colon cancers. R32's physician order dated 10/5/2022 with no end date, identified Ativan oral tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg) give by mouth PRN up to every four hours for anxiety and hallucinations. R32's medication administration record (MAR) for 7/1/24 to 7/14/24 identified R32 receiving PRN Ativan 14 times. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 12:16 p.m., assistant director of nursing (ADON) stated the interdisciplinary team (IDT) consults with pharmacy every month to go over pharmacy review recommendations. ADON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed for 2 of 3 residents (R42, R21) who had an indwelling catheter. In addition, the facility failed to ensure EBP were put in place for 1 of 1 resident (R12) with a chronic wound. The deficient practices had the potential to place these residents at an increased risk for transmission of infection. Findings include: R42: R42's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified impaired cognition and diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH, enlargement of the prostate), and urinary retention. The MDS further indicated R42 had an indwelling urinary catheter and needed staff assistance with dressing, grooming, bathing, transferring and toileting. R42's provider orders dated 4/24/24, identified an order for enhanced barrier precautions due to an indwelling urinary catheter. Gown and gloves must be worn when providing personal care or emptying the catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an ordered range of motion (ROM) program was provided consistently for 4 of 4 resident (R3, R5, R6, and R7) reviewed for positioning and mobility. Findings include: R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R3 had dementia with severe cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and transfers. R3's care plan revised 1/30/24 indicated R3 had a need for restorative intervention of an ambulation program of 200 feet with each walk. R3's Restorative Nursing Program form dated 6/1/22 indicated R3 would walk 200 feet daily with walker, gait belt, and stand by assist from staff. R3's Restorative Ambulation Record from 12/7/23 to 2/7/24, indicated ambulation was proved to R3 ten times, on 12/11/23, 12/12/23, 12/30/23, 1/3/24, 1/4/24, 1/5/24, 1/8/24, 1/13/24, 1/19/24, and 1/28/24. R5's significant change MDS dated [DATE] indicated R5 was cognitively intact, needed partial/moderate assistance with walking,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the physician and resident representative were timely notified of a change of condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who had a status change resulting in a delay of medical diagnoses and treatment. Findings include R1's Face Sheet identified R1 had the following diagnosis: Parkinson's disease R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identifies R1 to have had moderate cognitive impairment. Required assist of one for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and assist of two for transferring. R1's care plan dated 1/30/22, identified R1 required assist to safely transfer from one surface to another and staff were to monitor for changes in abilities. R1's progress note dated 9/8/23 at 11:23 a.m., included R1 weak, not eating, drooling, eyes glassed over, and left side of mouth drooping. No responding to questions. Resident appears to have possible stroke. Called MD and gave verbal orders to send to emergency room (ER). Family present signed bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure anti-Parkinson's medication was administered with in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations, and physician orders to prevent or reduce the risk of adverse side effects. Additionally failed to identify, report, and analyze medication errors in accordance with facility policy and standards of practice for 3 of 3 (R1, R2, R3) residents who received anti-Parkinson's medications. Findings include R1's Face Sheet identifies R1 had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. R1 required assist of one for bed, mobility, dressing, toilet use, and assist of two for transferring. R1's physicians orders included -Ferrous sulfate oral tablet (iron) to be given in the afternoon every day at 4:00 p.m. (start date 5/4/23) -Sinemet (carbidopa-levodopa) 25-100 milligrams (mg) five times per day every day at 6:00 a.m., 10:00 a.m., 2:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m., and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise or update care plans for 3 of 7 residents (R10, R4, R43) and failed to provide quarterly care conferences for 1 of 7 residents (R28) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R10 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included, congestive heart failure and hypertension. The Care Area Assessment indicated Dehydration was a specialized area to be addressed for R10. R10's Census report undated, indicated R10 was out of the facility on 5/22/23 due to hospitalization. R10's readmission orders dated 6/4/23, included 750 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction, daily weights and to notify provider if more than 2 (two) pound(lb) weight gain in twenty-four hours or 5 lbs in one week, daily intake and output (I&O) due to the fluid restriction for accurate monitoring. R10's care plan dated 8/26/22 indicated R10 was on a 1500 ml fluid restriction. The care plan lacked updates of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 880 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have a surveillance program in place, procedure to notify staff and visitors of precautions for contact isolation. In addition, the facility staff failed to follow standard of practice for hand hygiene and catheter cath for 2 residents (R19, R2) reviewed for infection control. This had the potential to affect 65 residents in the facility. Findings include: R19's Face Sheet, indicated R19 had diagnoses which included pulmonary blastomycosis (a pulmonary disease caused by inhaling spores of the dimorphic fungus blastomyces dermatitidis which can cause cough, fever, and non-healing skin lesions), viral hepatitis C (a virus that attacks the liver and leads to inflammation). R19's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated R19 was cognitively intact, had no rejections of care, and required extensive to total assistance with activities of daily living which included personal hygiene and toilet use. In addition, R19's MDS indicated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to follow a self-administration of medication assessment and left medication in the room for 1 of 1 (R9) resident reviewed for self-administration of medication. R9's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R9 had moderate cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included Parkinson's, epilepsy, depression, major depressive disorder, disorientation and Delirium. R9 had delusions and hallucinations. The Care Area Assessment Summary (CAA)-Focus areas to provide specialized, resident specific care, included Delirium, cognitive loss/dementia, psychosocial well-being and psychotropic drug use. R9's care plan undated, indicated cognitive impairment and behaviors. During an observation on 7/31/23 at 3:43 p.m., on R9's dresser included a bottle of saline nasal spray. A follow up observation on 8/3/23 at 8:05 a.m., the saline nasal spray remained on R9's dresser. R9's Medication Self Administration Assessment (SAM) form dated 5/15/23, indicated R9 was not safe to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the grab bar was secured appropriately to accommodate needs and promote independence with bed mobility for 1 of 1 resident (R6) who had concerns about a loose grab bar . Findings include: R6's Resident Face Sheet, indicated R6 had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, malignant neoplasm of right renal pelvis and bladder, heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), muscle weakness, morbid obesity, anxiety, osteoarthritis of left shoulder, and depression. R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R6 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living, bed mobility, and transfers. In addition, R6 had no rejections of care. R6's care plan modified on 6/15/23, indicated R6 required assistance with bed repositioning. Interventions included boost in bed as needed, dependent on two staff to reposition when in bed, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure conflicting directives for emergency care and treatment were clarified to ensure resident wishes would be implemented correctly in an emergent situation for 1 of 1 residents (R53) reviewed for advanced directives. Finding include: R53's Resident Face Sheet, indicated R53 had diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, cognitive communication deficit, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R53's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R53 was severely cognitively impaired. R53's Provider Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated [DATE], indicated the following: Section A: Attempt Resuscitation / CPR (Note: selecting this requires selecting Full Treatment in Section B). Hand written in the document was, Chest Compression Only NO INTUBATION Section B: Full treatment. Use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a written bed hold to resident and or family for 1 of 1 resident (R28) who was transferred to the hospital for medical evaluation. Findings include: R28's significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R28 was cognitively intact. R28's diagnoses included: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart disease. R28's medical record lacked a bed hold was completed when R28 transferred out of the facility on 4/9/23 for a medical evaluation. On 8/2/23 at 12:47 p.m., R28 stated when she left the facility, she never received or had to sign any paper about her bed being held at the facility for her. On 8/3/23 at 4:35 p.m., the assistant director of nursing (ADON) confirmed she did not have a bed hold document for 4/9/23 and that the EMR and the paper chart did not show evidence a bed hold was reviewed and completed with R28. The ADON stated she had called the nurse on that shift and the nurse had told her she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide timely assistance with toileting for 1 of 2 (R6) residents who required staff assistance with toileting. Findings include: R6's Face Sheet, indicated R6 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, malignant neoplasm of right renal pelvis and bladder, muscle weakness, depression, morbid obesity, and constipation. R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R6 was severely cognitively impaired, usually would understand and was usually understood. R6 had no rejections of care. In addition, R6 required extensive assistance with toilet use and was always continent of bowel and bladder. R6's care plan modified on 6/15/23, indicated R6 was continent of bowel and bladder, his goal was to remain continent of both. Interventions included staff to remind and assist R6 to the toilet upon rising, every two to three hours during the day and at bedtime. During an interview on 8/1/23 at 2:37 p.m., R6 stated he would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with repositioning to prevent the worsening or development of pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 (R19) reviewed pressure ulcers. Findings include: R19's Face Sheet, indicated R19 had diagnoses which included pulmonary blastomycosis (a pulmonary disease caused by inhaling spores of the dimorphic fungus blastomyces dermatitidis which can cause cough, fever, and non-healing skin lesions). R19's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated R19 was cognitively intact, had no rejections of care, and required extensive to total assistance with activities of daily living which included personal hygiene and toilet use. In addition, R19's MDS indicated he was incontinent of bowel, was at risk for pressure ulcers and had seven pressure ulcers on admission to the facility. R19's care plan dated 6/20/23, indicated willingness to be repositioned according to plan. Interventions included repositioning every two hours and reposition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure restorative therapy services were completed for 2 of 2 (R32, R28) residents evaluated for range of motion. Findings include: 32's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R32 had moderate cognitive impairment. R32 required extensive assistance for locomotion on and off the unit. Diagnoses included Stroke, heart failure and hemiplegia/hemiparesis-weakness or paralysis to one side of the body. R32's Care Area Assessment indicated Cognitive loss/dementia and falls as specialized areas of care R32 needed addressed. Restorative orders dated 11/22, copy hung on R32's closet door, indicated R32 was contact guard assist with front wheel walker (FWW). R32 was to be walked twice a day with assistance from staff. R32's care plan lacked indication R32 was on a daily restorative program. R32's Restorative therapy documentation from 11/1/22, to 8/3/23, was reviewed and indicated R32 lacked documentation of any restorative program…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing was available in order to ensure appropriate and timely care was given to 3 of 3 residents (R 6, R28, R32) who were to received range of motion, and provide timely assistance with toileting. Finding include: See F677: The facility failed to provide timely assistance with toileting for 1 of 2 (R6) residents who required staff assistance with toileting. During an interview on 8/1/23 at 2:25 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-E stated she was taking care of eight residents. NA-E stated sometimes it would be one NA for 19 residents and then it would be difficult to get cares completed. On days with one staff for 19 resident's showers would not get done. Checks and changes would be done but they might be late. During an interview on 8/1/23 at 2:37 p.m., R6 stated he would use his call light and no one would come to answer it and then he would have a bladder accident. During an interview on 8/3/23 at 8:40 a.m., R6 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room was free from urine odors for 2 of 21 residents (R53, R12) whose rooms were reviewed for odors. Findings include: R53's Resident Face Sheet no date, indicated R53 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, cognitive communication deficit, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R53's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R53 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and toilet use. In addition, R53's MDS indicated R53 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R53's care plan activated on 1/28/22, indicated R53 was always incontinent of bladder and was totally dependent on staff for all toileting needs. Interventions included check and change every two hours, provide pericare after each incontinent episode,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-07-17 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure required nurse staff data was posted daily before each shift, including over the weekend. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents, staff, and visitors who wish to review this information. Findings include: During observation on 7/14/24 at 1:40 p.m., a nursing staff data posting was in a plastic holder on the wall near the main entrance and next to the administrator's office. The posting labeled Guardian Angels Health & Rehab Daily Nurse staffing was dated 7/11/24. On 7/16/24 at 8:46 a.m., the administrator confirmed an updated/current nurse staff data sheet was not posted at the beginning of the shift on 7/12/24, 7/13/24, or 7/14/24. Administrator stated it was the responsibility of the scheduler to complete and post the nurse staff data sheets, but the scheduler was not at the facility on the 12th, 13th, or 14th . During interview on 7/17/24 at 10:05 a.m., scheduler explained when she was not at the facility, she will leave the completed nurse staff data sheets in the supervisors' book. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$26,481 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $12,048 — penalty dated 2024-11-12
- $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-07-17
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ST. FRANCIS HEALTH SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 4.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRIPPS, DANIEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2016 |
| EHLERS, DOUGLAS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| GOODNOUGH, JENNIFER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
| GRAMM, TIMOTHY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| LAIR, MICHAEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| LIENEMANN, STEVEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| LUETMER, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
| NELSON, PATRICK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2020 |
| RENTZ, LAURA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| RENTZ, PAUL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
| SCHNEIDER, TODD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2013 |
| WIESE, LORRAINE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/25/2017 |
| BACH, CURTIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/28/2024 |
| PETERSON-DEVRIES, CAMI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/08/2022 |
| RAW, CAROL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2026 |
| BIG STONE THERAPIES, INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/03/2015 |
| EIDE BAILLY LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/03/2023 |
| ST. FRANCIS HEALTH SERVICES OF MORRIS, INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/09/2008 |
| BLACK, PATRICIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/09/2024 |
| BROWNLEE, CARISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/11/2008 |
| BURROWS, AMANDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2024 |
| CASPERS, MEGAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/29/2014 |
| CONTRERAS, RICARDO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/11/2024 |
| COPEMAN, JEFFREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| HANNEKEN, MICHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/20/2022 |
| HEJHAL, ROXANNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/10/2023 |
| HOBBS, JOYCE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/06/2022 |
| HOFMANN, REED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/08/2023 |
| JUST, MATTHEW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| LEASE, CHEYENNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/07/2024 |
| MARLOW, JINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/06/2022 |
| MOORE, LAURELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/19/2024 |
| RENTZ, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/22/2024 |
| ROCHE, SHANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/08/2017 |
| RYAN, BEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/27/2012 |
| RYAN, GEOFFREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/12/1998 |
| STOCK, KELSEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| THOMPSON, RENEE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/10/2018 |
| TOMOSON, APRIL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/12/2021 |
| WALKER, AMY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/13/2024 |
| SAVOLAINEN, SHAWN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/29/2025 |
| SQUIRES, KELLY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/21/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 113 rows in the source record cover these 42 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $301K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245239. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.