No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Buffalo Prairie Center For Rehab And Healthcare

631 West Main Street, Buffalo, MO 65622 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (417) 932-8040 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jun 2025Resident-funds citation (F0570)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$92,080 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (66) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $92,080 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-08)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (77%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Newcomb0.2 mi
112 W Commercial St · (417) 345-2901 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
308 W Dallas St · (417) 345-6500 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
926 W Dallas St · (417) 345-7012 · Call to confirm hours
Park
W Ramsey · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.2%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.8%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.5%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.3%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms39.5%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.3%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.3%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication46.9%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.0%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.7%17.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table31.1%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.2%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine52.0%63.5%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.402.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.502.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.3–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.76
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
77.2%
Total nursing turnover
87.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 41.3 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 77% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-07)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

66 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to care plan and monitor a brain shunt (flexible tube surgically implanted to drain built-up fluid from the brain to another part of the body, helping relieve pressure in the brain), failed to ensure staff were aware of and trained in care of the shunt placement, failed to effectively address increased pain related to the resident's head, neck, and shoulder areas, and failed to notify the physician of increased head pain for one resident (Resident #1). The resident was sent to the hospital where the resident was taken to the operating room for shunt removal/replacement. The resident received a diagnosis of hydrocephalus (an abnormal buildup of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) deep within the brain. This excess fluid causes the ventricles (cavities) within the brain to widen, putting harmful pressure on the brain's tissues). The facility also failed to address signs of a possible urinary tract infection, including reduced urine output and dark…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing when the facility failed to timely assess and monitor, failed to obtain and document treatment orders, and failed to update the care plan regarding a facility acquired pressure ulcer that required surgical intervention for one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 40. Review of the facility policy titled, Wound Treatment and Management, dated 05/15/25, showed the following information:-Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change;-In the absence of treatment orders, the licensed nurse will notify the physician to obtain treatment orders. This may be the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to have a process in place to ensure all resident's wishes regarding cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR - an emergency procedure that is performed when a person's heartbeat or breathing has stopped) were honored when staff stopped performing CPR prior to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrival for one resident (Resident #1) who was found unresponsive. The facility census was 41.Review of the facility's policy titled, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), revised [DATE], showed the following:-The facility will follow current American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines regarding CPR;-If a resident experiences cardiac arrest, facility staff will provide basic life support, including CPR prior to the arrival of EMS and in accordance to with the resident's advance directives, and if the resident does not show obvious signs of clinical death. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide pharmaceutical services that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident when staff staff documented one resident (Resident #1) received Cefdinir (antibiotic used to treat various bacterial infections, including pneumonia) for multiple days after the stop date. The facility staff also failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) received prednisone (a potent steroid used to treat inflammation, severe allergies, autoimmune diseases, asthma, and certain cancers by suppressing the immune system and reducing swelling) as ordered when 10 of 11 possible doses were not documented. The facility had a census of 41.Review of the facility policy titled Medication Errors, revised 05/07/25, showed the following information:-Medication error means the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescribers order, manufacturer's specifications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior when odors, stains, dirty floors, and overflowing trashcans were present in resident use areas. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility policy titled, Cycle Cleaning, The Compliance Store, LLC., dated 06/15/25, showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility to identify the functional areas in the facility that require cleaning and to use cycle cleaning schedules to outline the frequencies and maintain regularly scheduled environmental service tasks;-Routine cleaning of environmental surfaces and non-critical resident care items shall be performed according to predetermined schedule and shall be sufficient to keep surfaces clean and dust free;-Specific areas include hallways, dayrooms, dining rooms, showers, utility, bathrooms, and resident's rooms;-The frequency of cleaning and disinfection of the facility environment may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and service care to prevent possible urinary tract infections when staff failed to provide catheter (tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder) care per standards of practice, failed to obtain an order for catheter care, and failed to complete catheter care per the care plan for one resident (Resident #2). The facility census was 40.Review of the facility policy titled Catheter Care, dated 05/02/25, showed the following information:-Catheter care will be performed every shift and as needed;-Gently grasp penis and draw foreskin back if applicable;-Using a circular motion, cleanse the meatus (opening) with a clean cloth moistened with water and soap;-With a new moistened cloth, starting at the urinary meatus, moving downward, cleanse the shaft of the penis;-With a new moistened cloth, starting at the urinary meatus, moving outward, and wipe the catheter making sure to hold the catheter in place to not pull…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and follow an effective infection control program when staff failed to perform proper hand hygiene and prevent cross-contamination while performing peri-care for one resident (Resident #2) and when providing wound care to one resident (Resident #4). The facility census was 40. Review of the facility policy titled Standard Precautions Infection Control, dated 04/18/25, showed the following:-All staff are to assume that all residents are potentially infected or colonized with an organism that could be transmitted during providing resident care services. Therefore, all staff shall adhere to standard precautions to prevent the spread of infection;-Hand hygiene is a general term for cleaning hands by handwashing with soap and water or the use of antiseptic hand rub, also known as alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) and should be performed during the delivery of resident care services. Avoid unnecessary touching of surfaces in close…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources (facility's operating budget) effectively and efficiently when the facility failed to ensure all bills were paid in a timely manner to prevent credit holds and delays in maintenance of the fire and rescue system. The facility census was 44. Review showed the facility did not provide policy and procedure regarding bill pay.1. During an interview on 01/18/26, at 9:52 A.M., the Maintenance Director said the following:-The fire and safety system, including sprinklers, was serviced by Marmic Fire and Rescue;-The only current concern with the system is an air pressure leak; -Marmic provided inspection and maintenance services quarterly.During an interview on 01/21/26, at 10:02 A.M., Marmic Fire and Safety Representative said the following:-The facility was currently on a credit hold;-The facility's last quarterly review was completed on 08/31/25 of the sprinkler system; -There was a deficientcy in the sprinkler system to include multiple leaks causing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment was provided for residents and staff when the facility failed to keep the walls in the kitchen free from discoloration, moisture, and fuzzy/powdery substance. The facility census was 44. 1. Observation and interview on 01/18/26, at 1:15 P.M., showed the following:-Upon entering the cleaning side of the kitchen and looking to the right there was black and green spotted discoloration was seen in the corner from the top of the sink area up to the ceiling. The texture appeared powdery;-DA H pulled back the splash guard behind the sink and black and green spotted discoloration was seen. The area also appeared wet;-DA H continued to pull back splash guards/protective paneling going further into the kitchen area near a window. Underneath the paneling was drywall with black and green spotted discoloration. The texture of the discoloration appeared powdery;-DA H pulled back the protective paneling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives and physicians were notified of changes in condition in timely fashion when staff failed to document guardian and physician notification for one resident (Resident #3) who had a documented change in condition. The facility census was 44.Review of the facility's policy titled Notification of Changes, dated [DATE], showed the following information:-The facility must inform the resident, consult the resident's physician, and/or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring notification;-Circumstances requiring notification include a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial condition such as deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status; -For residents that are incapable of making decisions, the representative would make any decisions that have to be made.1. Review of the Resident #3's face sheet (brief look at resident information) showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out their own activities of daily living (ADL - dressing, grooming, bathing, eating, and toileting ) received the necessary services to maintain grooming when the facility failed to ensure showers were offered to one resident (Resident #2). The facility census was 44.Review of the facility policy titled Resident Showers, dated 06/10/25, showed the following information:-It is the practice of this facility to assist resident's with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation, and help prevent skin issues in accordance with current standards of practice;-Residents will be provided showers in accordance with the resident's preferences, care plan, and safety needs, as well as the facility's scheduled bathing protocol.Review of the resident's face sheet, showed the following information:-admitted to the facility on [DATE];-Diagnoses include diabetes, dementia, high blood pressure, and chronic kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents when the facility failed to notify the resident's physician and family after a fall and failed to review and update the resident's care plan for one resident (Resident #2) who suffered a fall. The facility census was 44.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents when the facility failed to notify the resident's physician and family after a fall and failed to review and update the resident's care plan for one resident (Resident #2) who suffered a fall. The facility census was 44.Review of the facility policy titled Accidents and Supervision, dated 05/16/25, showed the following information:-Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents including identifying hazards, evaluating and analyzing hazards, implementing interventions to reduce hazards, and monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when necessary;-Fall refers to unintentionally coming to a rest on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 54 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors when the facility failed to have a chemotherapy medication (a powerful drug that kill fast-growing cancer cells by disrupting their ability to grow and divide) on hand for administration and failed to follow-up with the pharmacy and physician when the medication was not administered for one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 44. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Errors. dated 04/07/25, showed the following information:-Medication error means the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order, manufacturer's specifications regarding the preparation and administration of the medication or biological or accepted professional standards and principles which apply to professionals providing services;-Significant medication error means one which causes the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to control the fly population when multiple flies were present in and around four residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4). The facility census was 49.Review of the facility's policy titled Pest Control Program, revised 06/15/25, showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents;-Facility will utilize a variety of methods in controlling certain seasonal pests, flies. These will involve indoor and outdoor methods that are deemed appropriate by the outside pest service and state and federal regulations.1. Review of the facility's pest control service inspection reports showed the following:-On 12/08/25, inspection of the interior at 1:30 P.M. Bug light on main hall showed fly activity; -On 12/18/25, inspection with no detail of noted. 2. Review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported immediately to facility management and within two hours to the state licensing agency (Department of Health and Senior Services-DHSS) when staff failed to report an allegation of employee to resident abuse until the following day for one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 46. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention, dated 10/21/22, showed the following: -The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to facility staff, other residents, and staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitor, or any other individual; -Abuse is any willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. This includes the deprivation by any individual, including a caretaker of goods or services that are necessary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document a timely and thorough investigation, to include interviews with multiple staff and other residents, and immediate steps taken to protect all residents during the investigation for an allegation of possible physical abuse involving one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 46. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention, dated 10/21/22, showed the following: -The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to facility staff, other residents, and staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitor, or any other individual; -Abuse is any willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. This includes the deprivation by any individual, including a caretaker of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmacy services that included procedures for accurate administering and documentation of administration of all medications when staff failed to document administration of physician ordered medications for for six residents(Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #7, and #10). The facility census was 52. Review of the facility policy titled, Administration Procedures for All Medications, revised August 2014, showed the following: -Purpose to administer medications in a safe and effective manner; -After administration of medication, return to the cart, replace the medication container, and document administration in the medication administration record (MAR), and controlled substance sign out record, if indicated; -Monitor for side effects or adverse drug reactions immediately after administration and throughout each shift; -If resident refuses medication document refusal on MAR; -Notify physician of persistent refusals, held medications for pulse, blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at temperatures that were palatable and appetizing for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #8, and Resident #9) who often ate in their rooms. The facility census was 52. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Temperatures, undated, showed the following: -The temperature of all food items will be taken and properly recorded prior to service of each meal; -All hot food items must be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held and served at a temperature of at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F); -Cooking temperatures must be reached and maintained according to regulations, laws, and standardized recipes while cooking; -Hot food items may not fall below 135 degrees F after cooking; -All cold food items must be stored and served a temperature of 41 degrees F or below; -Temperatures should be taken periodically to assure hot foods stay about 135 degrees F and cold food stay below 41 degrees F during the holding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument completed by facility staff) in a timely manner for one residents (Resident #6). The facility census was 52. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to MDS assessments. 1. Review of Resident #6's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 04/08/25; -Diagnoses included vascular dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes), type II diabetes mellitus (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), major depressive disorder, Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), cerebral atherosclerosis (buildup of plaque in the arteries that supply blood to the brain), and history of mini stroke. Review of the resident's electronic record showed on 04/08/25, at 4:00 P.M., nursing staff documented the resident arriving to the facility. Review of the resident's electronic record showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete significant change Minimum Data Sets (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) one resident (Resident #7) who was moved to the locked unit in the facility. The facility census was 52 Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to MDS assessments. 1. Review of Resident #7's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 10/25/22; -Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave correctly with paranoia), congestive heart failure (CHF - a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), major depressive disorder, morbid obesity, type II diabetes mellitus, mild intellectual disabilities, impulse disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD - a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), and high blood pressure. Review of the facility incident report of theft and/or loss report dated 03/03/25, showed the following: -Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge with return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument completed by facility staff) and a readmission MDS within seven days for one resident resident (Resident #5). The facility census was 52 Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to MDS assessments. 1. Review of Resident #5's face sheet (a brief information sheet about the resident) showed the following: -admitted on [DATE]; -Diagnosis included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), atrial fibrillation A-Fib, an irregular and often very rapid heart rate that can lead to blood clots in the heart), cerebral infarction (stroke, a condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, causing brain tissue to die), muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for all residents when staff failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission of one resident (Resident #6). The facility census was 52. Review of the facility policy titled, Baseline Care Plan, dated April 2017, showed the following: -Development and implementation of a baseline care plan to deliver effective and person-centered care for the resident that meets professional standards of quality care within 48 hours of admission; -To assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission; -The interdisciplinary team will review the healthcare practitioner's orders, and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs including but not limited to initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services; -The baseline care plan will be used until the staff can conduct the comprehensive assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement accurate comprehensive care plans for all residents when staff failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for one resident (Resident #6) and when staff failed to care plan behaviors leading to one resident's (Resident #7) move to the locked unit. The facility census was 52. Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, dated April 2025, showed the following: -Development and implementation of a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that is consistent with resident rights, which include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified through the comprehensive assessment; -The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT-includes attending physician, registered nurse, nurse aide, dietary manager, social services, activity director, therapist, Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool administered by staff)/Care plan Coordinator, the resident and/or resident representative) in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in an effective and efficient manner to ensure the highest practical well-being of all residents when the facility failed to pay their bills in a timely manner for a generator that was being utilized resulting in the generator being removed. The facility census was 54. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding timeliness of payments to companies providing services. 1. Observation on 04/02/25, at 9:30 A.M., showed the following: -A disconnected natural gas generator outside the facility on a concrete pad near the kitchen exterior wall; -No other connected or operational generator was observed on the facility grounds. Review of facility invoices for generator services showed the following: -An invoice, dated 04/07/25, with an amount due of $41,796.95; -The invoice showed $27,838.45 was over 90 days past due; -The invoice showed $3,000 was 61-90 days past due; -The invoice showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-12 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides (NA) completed their training, competencies, and testing in a timely manner when two NA's failed to complete a state approved certified nursing assistant (CNA) training program, competency evaluation, and certification test within four months of hire and continued to work providing direct care to residents. The facility census was 54. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding NA training classes. 1. Review of the facility list of NA's currently employed at the facility, and working the floor as an NA, dated 04/02/25, showed the following: -NA I was hired as an NA on 09/02/24; -NA J was hired as a dietary staff on 03/23/24 and transitioned to NA on 09/23/24. Review of NA I's personnel file showed staff did not have documentation of a CNA certification. Review of NA J's personnel file showed staff did not have documentation of a CNA certification. During an interview on 04/12/25, at 10:56 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said NA's have 120 days from their date of hire to complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate incontinent care (support and management strategies needed to assist individuals who experience the involuntary loss of bladder or bowel control) was provided when staff failed to check and change one resident (Resident #1) who was visibly incontinent of urine. The facility had a census of 54. Review of the facility provided policy titled Incontinent Care, dated 07/21/22, showed the facility staff will provide incontinent care as directed in the plan of care. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed the following information: -admission date of 12/26/22; -Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (progressive brain disorder, the most common cause of dementia, that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, eventually leading to the inability to perform simple daily tasks), chronic kidney disease stage 3 (kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood the way they should, mild to moderate damage), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - noncancerous enlargement of the prostate gland) with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a functional environment for all residents, staff, and the public when staff failed to maintian the front entrance door power American Disabilities Act (ADA) button. The facility census was 50. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding maintenance of the front door. 1. Observation on 11/25/24, at 9:25 A.M., of the front entrance door showed the following: -An ADA push button located to the left of the front entrance door; -The power button located at the door open mechanism was illuminated and in the Auto-On position; -The door did not open when the ADA button was pressed. During an interview on 11/25/24, at 9:22 A.M., the Maintenance Director said the following: -He has worked at the facility for one month; -The ADA button for the front door has not worked since he started; -The door should be checked monthly for proper function; -He did not know why the door had not been fixed; -Maintenance staff are responsible for maintaining the door. During an interview on 11/25/24, at 11:21 A.M., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutrition unless unavoidable when staff failed to identify weight loss risk timely and failed to care plan current or new weight loss interventions for one resident (Resident #1) out of a sample of five residents. The facility census was 50. Review of the facility policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, revised September 2008, showed the following: -The multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for our residents; -The nursing staff will measure resident weights on admission, the next day, and weekly for two weeks thereafter. If no weight concerns are noted at this point, weights will be measured monthly thereafter; -Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietitian in writing. Verbal notification…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent and sufficient Registered Nurse (RN) and Director of Nursing (DON) hours to allow the DON to complete the duties of DON when the DON frequently had to work the charge nurse or a certified nurse aide (CNA). The facility census was 50. Review of the facility's job description titled, Director of Nursing Services, undated, showed the following: -The primary purpose of the position was to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of the nursing service department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern the facility and as may be directed by the Administrator or the Medical Director to ensure that the highest degree of quality care is maintained at all times; -The Director of Nursing Services is delegated the administrative authority, responsibility, and accountability necessary for carrying out assigned duties. In the absence of the Medical Director, the Director of Nursing Services is charged with carrying out the resident care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-07 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to employ a qualified dietary manager for food and nutrition services with accredited education in food service management. The facility census was 50. Review of the facility's policy titled, Director of Food and Nutrition Services, undated, showed the following: -The Director of Food and Nutrition Services (DFNS) will be responsible for all aspects of the food and nutrition services department including but not limited to food safety, staff safety, cost management, and meeting nutritional needs of patients/residents served; -The DFNS will be hired by corporate staff, the Administrator, or by the immediate supervisor of the position as deemed appropriate by the facility; -The DFNS will be qualified according to the position's job description and guidelines put forth by the agency that regulates the facility. A facility that does not have a full time dietitian (registered dietitian nutritionist or RDN) or clinically qualified nutrition professional must designate a person to serve as DFNS. According to the Centers for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in an effective and efficient manner to ensure the highest practical well-being of all residents when the facility failed to pay their bills in a timely manner. The facility census was 48. 1. Review of the facility's laboratory service invoices showed the following: -An invoice, dated 07/16/24, with an amount due of $446.46; -An invoice, dated 07/31/24, with an amount due of $3,063.46; -An invoice, dated 08/22/24, with an amount due of $3,497.40; -An invoice, dated 08/26/24, with an amount due of $327.46; -An invoice, dated 09/17/24, with an amount due of $918.94; -An invoice, dated 09/23/24, with an amount due of $2,684.94; -The invoice total due was $10,938.66. Review of a statement to the facility from the laboratory services company, dated 12/06/24, showed the following: -An invoice, dated 11/06/24, noted as 31 to 60 days past due, with an amount of $3,603.88; -An invoice, dated 11/06/24, noted as 61 to 90 days past due, with an amount of $7,334.78; -Total amount due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed maintain a complete and effective infection control program when the facility failed to have a thorough program for the prevention of the growth of the Legionella bacteria (a bacteria which causes a respiratory disease when breathing in small droplets of water in the air that contain Legionella. A Legionella infection is also called Legionnaires' Disease. It can become a health concern when it grows and spreads in human-made water systems.) in the facility water supply or where moist conditions existed. The facility also failed to perform hand hygiene per standards of practice during medication passes involving multiple residents. The facility census was 50. 1. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Toolkit for Legionella (which is officially titled Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth & Spread in Buildings) showed that healthcare facilities need to actively identify and manage hazardous conditions that support growth and spread of Legionella by: -Identifying building water systems for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective and complete antibiotic stewardship program when staff failed to track residents on antibiotics for various infections in the facility by not completing a current and ongoing antibiotic log of residents with active infections. This failure could potentially place all residents at risk of infection. The facility census was 50. Review of a facility policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship - Order for Antibiotics, dated December 2016, showed the following: -Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the general guidance of the Antibiotic Stewardship Program; -Prescribers will provide the drug name, dose, frequency, duration, route, and indication for antibiotic orders; -The prescriber will assess the resident within 24 hours of a telephone antibiotic order; -Appropriate indications for the use of antibiotics will include resident meeting criteria for a clinical definition of an active infection and pathogen susceptibility, based upon a culture and sensitivity test. 1, Review showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #6's face sheet showed the following information: -admission date of 07/02/24; -Diagnoses included type two diabetes, low blood pressure, peripheral vascular disease (PVD- a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to limbs), and heart failure. Review of the resident's annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following information: -At risk for developing pressure ulcers; -Has stage one or greater pressure ulcer; -Two stage 2 pressure ulcers present at admission. Reviewoftheresidentscareplan lastrevisedon08/15/24, showedthefollowinginformation -CompleteBradenscaleuponadmission; -Completeweeklyskinassessmentperschedule -Notifyphysicianofanynewskinimpairmentandimplementtreatmentorders -Orderfromphysiciantocleansewoundtoleftgluteal(buttock fold applycollagenpowder(used to promote wound healing) towoundbed coverwithsacral (tailbone) borderdressingasneededanddailyonMonday Wednesday andFriday -Orderfromphysiciantocleansewoundtoleftposterior(backof thigh…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care per standards of practice when staff failed to ensure staff changed oxygen equipment per professional standards for two residents (Resident #46 and #36) and failed to accurately document oxygen orders and care plan the use of oxygen for one resident (Resident # 36) out of a sample of 20 residents selected for review. The facility had a census of 50. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding oxygen administration. 1. Review of Resident #46's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission date of 06/12/24; -Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), heart disease (condition where the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), and chronic kidney disease (disease that causes progressive damage and loss of function to the kidneys).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide effective pain management for all residents when staff failed to administer pain medications as ordered for two residents (Resident #252 and #36) and when staff failed to document an order for pain medication for one resident (Resident #36). A sample of 20 residents was reviewed in the facility with a census of 50. Review of the facility's policy titled Pain Assessment and Management, revised in March 2015, showed the following information: -Pain management was defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain to a level that is acceptable to the resident and is based on his or her clinical condition and established treatment goals; -Pain management is a multidisciplinary care process that includes, assessing the potential for pain, effectively recognizing the presence of pain, identifying the characteristics of pain, addressing the underlying cause of pain, developing and implementing approaches to pain management, identifying and using specific strategies for different levels of pain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of 5% or less when facility staff made five medication errors out of 39 opportunities (12.82% error rate) affecting three residents (Resident #9, #34, and #49). The facility census was 50. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, undated, showed the five rights to be followed were the right patient, right drug, right dose, right time and right route; 1. Review of Resident #9's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following information: -admission date of 11/28/22; -Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (chronic, metabolic disease characterized by elevated levels blood glucose) and congestive heart failure (CHF - chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Sheet (MDS - a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument completed by facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications were stored and labeled in accordance with standards of practice when staff failed to store controlled substances under two locks for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #39) and when medication carts were left unlocked when unattended. The facility census was 50. Review of the facility's Storage of Medication Policy, undated, showed the following: -The facility shall store all drugs and biological's in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; -The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; -Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biological's shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others; -Medication requiring refrigeration must be stored in a refrigerator per the manufactures recommendation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences when they failed to have hydration accessible for one resident (Resident #20) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 50. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Hydration and Prevention of Dehydration, revised October 2011, showed the following information: -The facility will endeavor to provide adequate hydration and to prevent and treat dehydration; -Nurses' Aides will provide and encourage intake of bedside, snack, and meal fluids, on a daily and routine basis as a part of daily care. -If potential inadequate intake or signs and symptoms of dehydration are observed, intake and output monitoring will be initiated and incorporated into the care plan. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) status, diagnosis, individual preferences, habits, and cognitive and medical status will be considered in all interventions. Physician will be informed; -Orders may be written for extra fluids to be encouraged between meals and/or with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the required Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Screening (Level 1) to identify residents with a mental disability (MD), intellectual disability (ID) or a related condition for one resident (Resident #30) prior to admission to the facility. The facility census was 50. Review of a facility policy titled admission Criteria, dated December 2016, showed the following: -Nursing and medical needs of individuals with mental disorders will be determined by coordination with Medicaid PASARR program to the extent practicable; -Potential residents with mental disorders will only be admitted if the state mental health agency has determined (through the preadmission screening program) that the resident has a physical or mental condition that requires the level of service provided by the facility. 1. Review of Resident #30's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following information: -admission date of 11/28/22; -Diagnoses included major depressive disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident when facility staff documented ordered medication could not be administered on multiple dates due to not being available on-site for one resident (Resident #15). The facility census was 50. Review of the facility's policy Documentation of Medication Administration, revised April 2007, showed the following: -The facility shall maintain a medication administration record to document all medications administered; -A nurse or certified medication aide (where applicable) shall document all medications administered to each resident on the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR); -Administration of medication must be documented immediately after (never before) it is given. Review of the facility's policy titled 'Medication Orders' revised November 2014, showed the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to establish uniform guidelines in the receiving and recording of medication orders; -A current list of orders must be maintained in the clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free of significant medication errors when staff failed to administer warfarin sodium (blood thinner that be used to treat and prevent blood clots) per the physician's order and failed to notify nurse management or the physician of the missed doses for one resident (Resident #152). The facility census was 50. Review of the facility's policy Documentation of Medication Administration, revised April 2007, showed the following: -The facility shall maintain a Medication Administration Record (MAR) to document all medications administered; -A nurse or certified medication aide, where applicable, shall document all medications administered to each resident on the resident's MAR; -Administration of medication must be documented immediately after, never before, it is given; -Documentation must include, as a minimum: name and strength of the drug, dosage, method of administration, date and time of administration; reason(s) why a medication was withheld, not administered or refused (as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete medical records for all residents when staff failed to document full details and notifications related to two residents (Resident #41 and #46) who transferred to the hospital and later returned to the facility. The facility census was 50. Review of the facility's policy titled Charting and Documentation, revised April 2008, showed the following: -All services provided to the resident, or any changes in the resident's medical or mental condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record; -All incidents, accidents, or changes in the resident's condition must be recorded; -Documentation of procedures and treatments shall include care-specific details and shall include at a minimum the date and time the procedure/treatment was provided; the name and title of the individual(s) who provided the care; the assessment data and/or any unusual findings obtained during the procedure/treatment; how the resident tolerated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when the facility failed to document transcribe physician's orders accurately for one resident's (Resident #1) antipsychotic medication resulting in the resident receiving an incorrect dosages of medication. The facility had a census of 52. Review of a facility policy titled, admission Assessment and Follow Up: Role of the Nurse, not dated, showed the following: -Staff are to reconcile the list of medications from the medication history, admitting orders, previous medication administration records if available, and discharge summary from the previous institution; -Staff are to contact the attending physician to communicate and review the findings of the initial assessment and any other pertinent information and obtain admission orders that are based on these findings. Review of a facility document titled, Admission/re-admission Checklist, not dated, showed the following: -Staff are to review and enter all medication and treatment orders provided by the hospital;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of all the residents in a timely fashion and to provide showers in a timely fashion to four residents (Residents #3, #5, #16, and #37). The facility census was 49. 1. During a resident group meeting on 12/7/22, at 10:51 A.M., residents said the following; -Weekends are really bad regarding staffing with a very skeleton crew, very slow at getting to the lights and nurses passing medications; -One resident said the facility is short-handed during the day, but it was especially bad at night for the past nine months to a year. Often there was only one staff in the memory care unit during the night and one nurse acted as both nurse and aide for the rest of the facility; -Resident #40 is supposed to use a walker, but requires someone to be stand-by assistance. They have told him/her they don't have the staff for this, so he/she must use the wheelchair. -The facility has no restorative aide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable and appeasing food to all residents. The facility had a census of 49. Record review of the facility policy, titled Menus, revised 2008, showed the following: -Menus shall meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, and meeting the needs in accordance with the recommended dietary allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board; -Menus and available snacks shall be adjusted to meet individual caloric and nutrient-intake needs of the resident; -The dietitian will review and approve all menus; -Deviations from menus that have already been posted will be noted and recorded noting such changes; -Menus will provide a variety of foods from the basic daily food groups and will indicate standard portions at each meal; -Menus will be varied for the same day of consecutive weeks; -When a cycle menu is used, the cycle shall be of no less than tree weeks duration and revised periodically, with consideration of resident input; -Menus will be adjusted periodically to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to protect food while stored per professional standards food contact surfaces (dishes) were stacked wet instead of air dried, dented cans were stored were no separated to prevent use, and when staff failed to date, label, or seal stored food after opening. The facility census was 48. 1. Record review of the facility policy titled Food Receiving and Storage, revised the 2014, showed the following information: -When food is delivered to the facility it will be inspected for safe transport and quality before being accepted; -Dry foods that are stored in bins will be removed from original packaging, labeled and dated ('use by date); -Such foods will be rotated using a first in-first out system; -Any other opened containers must be dated and sealed or covered during storage. An observation on 12/06/22, at 9:06 A.M., of the dry food storage room showed the following items were found to be unlabeled and undated: -An opened five pound bag of instant mashed potatoes; -An opened five pound bag of buttermilk biscuit mix;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program for all residents when the facility failed to have a program in place for the prevention of the growth of Legionella bacteria (a bacteria which causes a respiratory disease when breathing in small droplets of water in the air that contain Legionella. It can become a health concern when it grows and spreads in human-made water systems) in the facility water supply or where moist conditions existed. The facility staff also failed to use appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infectious causing contaminants when staff failed to use appropriate hand hygiene while completing medication administration for two residents (Resident #3 and #8). The facility census was 49. 1. Record review of the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Toolkit for Legionella (also titled Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth & Spread in Buildings), dated 03/25/2021, showed healthcare facilities need to actively identify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a criminal background check (CBC) and Employee Disqualification List (EDL - a state listing of individuals who have been determined to have: abused or neglected a resident, patient, client, or consumer; misappropriated funds or property belonging to a resident, patient, client, or consumer; or falsified documentation verifying delivery of services to an in-home services client or consumer) check for one staff (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) S) and failed to check the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry for two staff (CNA D and Registered Nurse (RN) S) to ensure they did not have prior criminal offenses or a Federal Indicator (a marker given to a potential employee who has committed abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property against residents) prohibiting them from working in a certified facility. The facility's census was 49. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy pertaining to background screenings. 1. Record review of CNA D's personnel records showed: -Re-hire/Start date of 9/28/2021; -The facility did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-13 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer or discharge to the hospital, including the reason for the transfer, for three residents (Residents #44, #200 and #203). The facility census was 49. Record review showed the facility did not have a written policy and procedure pertaining to written notices to residents and/or their representative when a resident is transferred to the hospital. 1. Record review of Resident #44's face sheet showed an admission date of 9/26/2022. Record review of resident's nurses' notes showed the following information: -On 11/24/2022, at 10:41 A.M., the resident had a temperature between 100 and 103.5 degrees Fahrenheit (F - 98.7 degrees F is considered normal) that morning. Staff applied cool compresses under the arms and groin area. Staff made call to covering doctor. New orders received to send the resident to the hospital to be evaluated and treated. The resident's family was notified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-13 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to give written information to the resident and/or resident's representative regarding the facility's bed hold policy for five residents (Residents #4, #44, #48, #200, and #203) who were transferred out to the hospital. The facility census was 49. Record review showed the facility did not have a written policy pertaining to the issuance of written information to the resident and/or resident's representative of the bed hold policy when a resident is transferred out of the hospital. Record review of a facility form entitled Bed-Hold Notice showed the following information: -Staff should fill in blanks for: resident name; facility name; maximum number of days for no cost bed hold while hospitalized or during therapeutic leave or vacation (if facility is paid by Medicaid); and facility contact information; -Medicare and private pay residents may hold their bed at the current room and board rate as indicated; -Resident or their representative are to indicate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-13 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment for eight residents (Residents #7, #9, #16, #27, #29, #32, #36, and #38) not less than every three months (92 days). The facility had a census of 49. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, Chapter 2, Assessments for the RAI, showed the following information: -The quarterly assessment is an Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA) non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type; -The quarterly assessment is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessments to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status are monitored; and -The ARD must be not more than 92 days after the (assessment review date) ARD of the most recent OBRA assessment of any type. 1. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan related to Resident #3's urinary catheter care and shower needs. The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan related to Resident #16's ostomy (allows bodily waste to pass through a surgically created area on the abdomen into a 'pouch' or 'ostomy bag' on the outside of the body) medical needs. The facility failed to update Resident #42's care plan to reflect the findings of the resident's assessment for safety while smoking. The facility census was 49. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to care plans. 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet (gives basic profile information) showed the following information: -admission date of 7/26/22; -Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (disease in which the immune system eats away at the protective covering of nerves disrupting communication between the brain and the body), type 2 diabetes mellitus (impairment in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-13 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective system to ensure a resident's choice of code status (the type of emergent treatment a person would or would not receive if their heart or breathing were to stop) was readily accessible to staff and documented consistently throughout the medical record for four residents (Residents #4, #5, #10, and #200). The facility census was 49. Record review of the facility policy, titled Advance Directives, dated [DATE], showed the following information: -Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse of accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate and advance directive if he or she chooses to do so; -Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the Social Services Director (SSD) or designee will inquire of the resident, his/her family members and or his/her legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directive; -Information about whether or not the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to store refrigerated medications at the manufacture's recommended temperatures and failed to have a system in place to monitor and adjust the temperature as needed. The facility census was 49. Record review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, dated April 2007, showed the following information: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; -Medications requiring refrigeration must be stored in a refrigerator located in the medication room or other secured location. Medication must be stored separately from food and must be labeled accordingly. 1. Observation on 12/12/22, at 11:15 A.M., of the medication refrigerator in the medication room located behind the nurse desk showed the following: -The thermometer in the medication refrigerator read 26 degrees Fahrenheit (F); -There was no temperature log found in the medication room or at the nurse desk; -Located on the top of the refrigerator was an orange sheet of paper in a plastic protective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate self-determination when staff failed to honor the preference of one resident (Resident #16) to take his/her own smoking supplies off of facility property when signing out. The facility failed to promote self-determination when the facility presented a new facility policy showing the resident (Resident #3) could no longer use electronic cigarette devices and took his/her personal property away, resulting in the resident purchasing cigarettes in order to smoke. The facility census was 49. Record review of the facility provided, undated, policy titled, Smoking Policy, showed the following in information: -It is the policy of the facility to provide employees with as near a smoke-free environment as possible and to ensure safe smoking practices for those who smoke; -Employee smoking is permitted only in places where is designated. Smoking is prohibited in all other areas; -Areas where smoking is permitted are posed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide clean bed linens that were in good condition for four residents (Residents #15 and #18). The facility census was 49. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to resident bed sheets. Record review of the facility's Shower Schedule, dated 10/19/2022, showed shower days are also bed strips and bed cleaning days. 1. Record review of Resident #15's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 7/12/19; -Diagnoses included pigmentary retinal dystrophy (major cause of severe progressive vision loss), asthma (airways become inflamed, narrow and swell, and produce extra mucus, which makes it difficult to breathe) , anxiety disorder,and type 2 diabetes mellitus (impairment in the way the body regulates and uses sugar (glucose) as a fuel). Record review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated assessment completed by staff), dated 9/23/22, showed the following information: -Cognitively intact; -Required extensive assistance of one staff person for bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete and electronically transmit a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff) for one resident (Resident #39). The facility census was 49. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, Chapter 2, Assessments for the RAI, showed the following information: -The discharge assessment is an Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA) non-comprehensive resident assessment; -The discharge assessment must be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the discharge; -The MDS must be transmitted no later than 14 calendar days after the MDS completion date. 1. Record review of Resident #39 MDS submitted reports showed the following information: -admitted to the facility 7/16/2022; -admission Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/23/2022; -Staff did not complete and transmit a discharge assessment within 28 days of the resident's discharge date of 10/14/2022. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for one resident (Resident #203) and failed to document reviewing or providing a copy of a baseline care plan to the resident and/or resident representative. The facility census was 49. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy pertaining to baseline care plans. 1. Record review of Resident #203's facility face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following information: -admission date of 12/1/22; -Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure (inability of the respiratory system to meet the oxygenation or ventilation requirements of the patient) with hypoxia (deficiency in the amount of oxygen reaching the tissues), personal history of traumatic brain injury (form of acquired brain injury, occurs when a sudden trauma causes damage to the brain), and person injured in motor-vehicle accident. Record review of the resident's medical record, on 12/9/22, showed no record of a baseline care plan.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to ensure every hose that extended below the flood plain had a backflow preventer (an anti-siphon device used to keep toxins from backing up into the potable water supply). This affected both of the shower rooms. The facility census was 46. 1. Observation on 11/5/19, starting at 10:30 A.M., showed: - The shower hose in the hospice/unit shower room extended to the floor and did not have a backflow preventer. - Both shower hoses in the main shower room extended to the floor and did not have a backflow preventer. During an interview on 11/5/19, at 3:45 P.M., the Maintenance Supervisor said he did not realize all hoses that extended below the flood plain were required to have a backflow preventer.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-11-08 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond sufficient to ensure protection of resident funds. The facility's census was 46. 1. Record review of the facility's documented surety bond showed the facility had an approved bond for $20,000.00. Record review of the facility's reconciled bank statements from October 2018 through September 2019, showed an average monthly balance of $23,000.00. Based on this amount, the facility needed a bond of at least $34,000.00 (one and a half times the average monthly balance). During an interview on 11/8/19, at 9:17 A.M., the business office/facility bookkeeper said after she received the facility's monthly bank statement she scanned and sent it to the corporate office. Corporate staff added the interest to each resident fund account. Facility funds and resident funds were kept in separate accounts. She did not notice the average monthly balance increased from $8,000.00 to $33,000.00. She did not review the reconciled statements. Interviews with the administrator on 11/8/19, showed the following: -At 9:50 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN, form CMS-10055) or a denial letter at the initiation, reduction, or termination of Medicare Part A benefits for one resident (Resident #37) who remained in the facility after discharge from Medicare Part A services. The facility census was 46. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C -09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following: -If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not be covered and the beneficiary's potential liability for payment for the non-covered services. The SNF's responsibility to provide notice to the resident can be fulfilled by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to maintain or improve one resident's (Resident #41) functional status as directed by therapy out of a selected sample of 16 residents. The facility census was 46. Record review of the facility's Restorative Nursing Services policy, updated July 2017, included the following information: -Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. Record review of the facility's Resident Mobility and Range of Motion policy, updated July 2017, included the following information: -Residents will not experience an avoidable reduction in range of motion (ROM); -Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM; -Residents with limited mobility will receive appropriate services, equipment and assistance to maintain or improve mobility unless reduction in mobility is unavoidable. 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #35), with a history of acute renal failure and urosepsis (sepsis caused by an infection of the urinary tract), received necessary monitoring after the physician discontinued his/her indwelling urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine)and failed to follow physician's orders for recatheterization when the resident had no urinary output, resulting in severe urinary retention. A sample of 16 residents were selected for review in a facility with a census of 46. Record review of the facility's Foley (indwelling) Catheter Removal policy, revised on October 2010, included the following information: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the approved method of removing an Foley catheter; -The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: the date and time the procedure was performed, the name and title of the individual who performed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-12-13 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to post required nurse staffing information daily. The facility census was 49. 1. Observation on 12/06/22, at 10:52 A.M., showed the nurse staffing hours posted on a board behind the main nursing station. The staff posting was dated 11/22/22. Observation on 12/09/22, at 10:01 A.M., showed the nurse staffing hours posted on a board behind the main nursing station. The staff posting was dated 12/8/22. Observation on 12/11/22, at 7:30 P.M., showed the nurse staffing hours posted on a board behind the main nursing station. The staff posting was dated 12/8/22. Observation on 12/12/22, at 11:10 A.M., showed the nurse staffing hours posted on a board behind the main nursing station. The posting was dated 12/8/22. Observation on 12/13/22, at 1:30 P.M., showed the nurse staffing hours posted on a board behind the main nursing station. The posting was dated 12/8/22. During an interview on 12/13/22, at 12:00 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the night staff should be completing the daily staff hours form and posting it on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$92,080 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $92,080 — penalty dated 2026-01-08
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-27 for 6 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-07 for 49 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BLUE SKY BASIN, LLC — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BLUE SKY BASIN LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST67%since 08/31/2021
DKDP MISSOURI LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST23%since 08/31/2021
DKYH MISSOURI LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 08/31/2021
SLOANS LAKE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST63%since 08/31/2021
BURNS, KARENIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/31/2021
BERGER, ELIOTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/31/2021
PERLOW, BERNARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/31/2021
STERN, SAMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2023

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$461K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 7%Other / private 29%

This home reported $461K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$241per resident / day
operating cost
$7,339per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$240per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265471. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next