No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Grove At Kirkwood, The

711 South Kirkwood Road, Kirkwood, MO 63122 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 117 certified beds · (314) 965-0864 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jan 2026Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0567, F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$172,400 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (70) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $172,400 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-29)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
816 S Kirkwood Rd · (314) 965-1825 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1042 S Kirkwood Rd · (314) 822-4865 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.5 mi
1125 S Kirkwood Rd · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
340 S Fillmore Ave · (314) 822-5855 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.3%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.8%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.4%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.2%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.5%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.1%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.8%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.8%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.4%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.0%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.9%63.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.8%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.5%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.572.111.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.602.331.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
32.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 32.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.5%CMS range 44.2–61.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.7–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge32.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge22.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 3.8–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.16
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.86
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.09
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 101.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.79 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.19 to 0.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

46
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-29)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

70 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered prescription medications were received timely from the pharmacy and administered as ordered, for six residents (Residents #66, #10, #52, #93, #131, and #108). The sample was 21. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Ordering Medication policy, undated, showed:-Procedure:--Medication orders are faxed to the pharmacy and written on a medication order form provide by the pharmacy. The entry includes:---Date ordered;---Indication of new or refill order;---New orders should include: name of medication, strength of medication, dosage, time or frequency, route of medication, quantity or duration, and diagnosis or indication of use;---Reorder medication three days in advance to ensure an adequate supply is on hand; ---The refill form is faxed to pharmacy;--- Do not wait until the page is full to send to pharmacy. Send after medication pass is completed;---Check the emergency box supply before if medications are needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound dressing changes were completed as ordered and as needed for two residents (Residents #12 and #123) and facility staff failed to ensure compression stockings were applied as ordered for one resident (Resident #12). The sample was 21. The census was 91. Review of the facility's Wound Management policy, dated July 2025, showed:-To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, the facility will provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders;-Procedure:-Wound Management:--Wound Treatment will be provided in accordance with the physician order;---Cleaning Method;---Type of dressing;---Frequency of dressing change;--Dressing changes may be provided outside of the frequency parameter in certain situations:---Urine, feces, or other bodily fluids have saturated through the dressing;---Dressing is dislodged;---Dressing is soiled;--Wound dressings will be applied in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. 1. Review of Resident #12's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure injury (skin damage caused by prolonged pressure usually occurring over boney areas) when staff failed to report a new skin issue to the Wound Nurse in a timely manner, and when staff failed to implement pressure-reducing interventions timely upon identification of a new skin integrity issue for one resident (Resident #505). The census was 66. The sample was 33. Review of the Wound Management policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: To promote healing of wounds in accordance with standards of practice;-Procedure: Wound documentation:--Location of the wound;--Pressure injury and stage;--Size;--Volume and exudate (drainage);--Pain evaluation;--Presence of infection;--Condition of the wound bed and edges, condition of the peri-wound (tissue around wound edges);--Resident goals;-Guidelines:--Physician order;--Review wound care formulary to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders pertaining to the nutritional requirements for one resident, which included no monthly weight since September 2025 and not administering a nutritional supplement as ordered. The resident had a 5.49% weight loss in four months (Resident #27). The sample was 21. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Weight Variance policy, dated July 2025, showed:-All residents who experience significant, insidious and/or unintentional/unplanned weight loss or gains shall be assessed for nutritional status by Registered Dietitian (RD). Recommendations from RD to include but not limit to adding calorie rich/preferred snacks between meals, fortification, supplements, liberalizing diet, and plan for expected weight changes;-Residents receiving supplements shall be monitored for acceptance by the Dietary Manager (DM)/nursing staff. Residents at risk for unintentional/unplanned weight variance may be monitored with weekly weights. Weights shall be reviewed by the RD for review and assessment;-Residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services to assist a resident (Resident #507) lacking decision-making capacity in obtaining a legal representative, despite hospital documentation identifying the need for guardianship. The facility failed to ensure admission agreements and Do Not Resuscitate (DNR, no life saving measures) code status was signed upon admission and in the medical record for two residents (Resident #507 and Resident #505). The facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were conducted quarterly and updated with the goals, medical needs, and daily living support of one resident (Resident #94). The sample size was 33. The census was 66. Review of the facility's undated Social Services Director job description, showed:-Purpose: The primary purpose of your position is to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of the Facility's Social Services Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0620 — widespread
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update records of residents' personal possessions per facility policy for two sampled residents (Residents #44 and #12). The facility failed to ensure one resident received an admission packet (Resident #124). In addition, the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided an accurate admission agreement that reflected financial terms related to refundable deposits following a change in management (Resident #129). The sample size was 21. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Grievance and Missing Property policy, dated, 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: Residents and their representatives have to right to report missing items or property;-Procedure: Grievances may be presented to any staff member and the staff member may resolve the issue immediately; If unable to resolve immediately, follow the grievance procedure; Supervisory personal will be responsible for notifying the resident and their representative of outcome of missing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure payments were issued or issued in a timely manner, to the facility's food supplier, staffing agency, dietician, and other necessary vendors utilized to provide services for the needs of residents, placing residents at risk for interruption of services and inadequate care. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 91. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment, undated, showed:-Purpose: The facility assessment is a complete review of internal human and physical resources required by the facility to care for residents competently during day to day (including nights and weekends) and emergency operations. The facility assessment identifies your capabilities as a skilled nursing services provider;-The assessment is not intended as a static tool but is intended to be a living document. It should include the business plan, staffing plan, the types of residents served, and the resources and physical plant required to competently care for the identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a complete and thorough facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility assessment did not include a monthly average number of residents who required assistance with activities of daily living. The census was 91. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment, updated 12/18/25, showed:-People involved in completing: Administrator A, Director of Nursing (DON) C, and Director of Maintenance;-Date reviewed with Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee: 12/18/25;-Number of licensed beds: 117;-Average daily census: 100;-Average weekday admissions by shift: 3-4;-Average weekend admissions by shift: 0-1;-Average weekday discharges by shift: 3-4;-Average weekend discharges by shift: 0-1;-Assistance with activities of daily living monthly average:-Bed mobility sit to lying: --Set up: blank;--Supervision/partial/moderate assistance: blank;--Dependent/max assistance: blank;-Mobility sit to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance/Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAA/QAPI - a written plan containing the process that will guide the facility's efforts in assuring care and services are maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continually improved) committee developed and implemented an appropriate plan of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The sample was 21. The facility census was 91. Review of the facility's QAPI policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: The QAPI plan will describe how the facility will ensure care and services delivered meet accepted standards of quality, identify problems and opportunities for improvement, and ensure progress towards improvement is achieved and sustained. The QAA Committee will meet monthly to assess and monitor the quality of services provided to residents and identify potential problems or areas of opportunity for improvement. The QAA Committee will implement and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards by not implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and as required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for six residents (Residents #13, #12, #63, #4, #108, and #7). The facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices during perineal care (cleaning of the genitals and rectal area) for four residents (Residents #13, #63, #4, and #11). The facility failed to disinfect a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift) in between use on two residents (Residents #7 and #91). The facility failed to complete a tuberculin test (a test to determine if exposed to tuberculosis (TB, a contagious lung disease)) on five of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The census was 91. Review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship policy, dated, 7/1/25, showed:-Intention: It is the policy of this facility to implement an antibiotic stewardship program as part of the facility's overall infection prevention and control program. The purpose of the program is to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use;-Policy: The Medical Director, Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Prevention Control (IPC) Nurse, and Consultant Pharmacist serve as leaders of antibiotic stewardship program and receive support from the Administrator and governing officials at the facility. During an interview on 1/23/26 at 2:19 P.M., Administrator A said the antibiotic stewardship program had not been updated since March 2025. The IPC Nurse recently quit, and the facility just started the program back up on 1/22/26. Administrator A said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 52 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer the COVID-19 vaccine for five out of five residents reviewed (Resident # 12, #13, #8, #9, and #6). The census was 91.Review of the facility's COVID Vaccine policy, dated, 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: The facility will offer the COVID vaccine to assist in mitigating the spreads of COVID-19;-Procedure: COVID-19 vaccinations shall be offered to all residents unless such immunization is medically contraindicated; Residents shall be educated on the COVID-19 vaccine they are offered, in a manner they can understand, including the information of the benefits and risks with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) or Food and Drug administration (FDA); Residents shall be offered the opportunity to ask questions about the risk and benefits of the vaccination; The facility shall maintain documentation of COVID-19 vaccine for all residents in the medical record. 1.Review of Resident #12's medical record showed:-Diagnoses that included heart failure and kidney disease;-No documentation that the resident was offered or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had a system in place to track the required Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 12 hours annual education (in-services). The facility identified 10 CNAs who worked for the facility for at least one year and all ten were sampled. Three out of 10 CNAs did not have any documented training hours, and seven out of 10 CNAs did not have the required training hours. The facility failed to ensure all CNAs were in-serviced on dementia care and abuse and neglect. In addition, there were no CNAs that received education after September 2025. The census was 91.Review of the Facility Assessment, updated and reviewed on 12/18/25, showed Staff Training/Education and Competencies:-Abuse, neglect and exploitation: training that at a minimum educates staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Procedures for reporting incidents of abuse and neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property. Care/management for persons with dementia and resident abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity and in a respectful manner when staff wore earbuds while providing care for one resident (Residents #11) and one resident reported that staff frequently have earphones in (Resident #44). In addition, the facility failed to ensure all residents were served meals on reusable dishware and utensils instead of Styrofoam. The sample was 21. The facility census was 91.Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, reviewed 7/1/25, showed the facility shall treat residents with kindness, respect, dignity, and ensure residents rights are being followed. The resident/resident representative will be informed of their rights upon admission. Review of the facility's employee handbook, undated, showed non-negotiable expectations: Use of cell phones for any purpose in any resident care areas including resident rooms, halls, nurse's stations and common areas is strictly prohibited. Cell phones are not to be heard or seen in these areas. This is the same expectation with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate the right of self-determination for every resident when staff failed to honor reasonable food requests of offering fresh fruit for one resident (Resident #13), and five of five residents representing the resident council who said they wanted fresh fruit. Fresh fruit was listed on the facility menu as an option for breakfast. The facility census was 91.Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, reviewed 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: The facility shall treat residents with kindness, respect, dignity, and ensure resident rights are being followed. The resident/resident representative will be informed of their rights upon admission;-Resident rights included the right to:--Exercise rights;--Planning/implementing care;--Make decision/choices;--Self-determination. Review of the facility's weekly menu showed fresh fruit offered with breakfast. During an interview on 1/22/26 at 9:30 A.M., Resident #13 said fresh fruit or salads are not offered any longer on the meal trays. Only canned fruit is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances raised by resident council members were acted upon in a timely manner and failed to give a rationale as to why the grievances were not acted upon. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The sample was 21. The census was 91. Review of the facility's Grievance policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: Residents and resident representatives have the right to voice concerns or grievances, which affect their lives at this facility, without fear of discrimination or reprisal;-Procedure: Grievances may be presented to any staff member; the staff member may resolve the issue immediately. If unable to resolve immediately, follow the grievance procedure;-Social Service/Grievance Official is responsible for notifying the resident representative, and ombudsman, as appropriate, of resolution. Interdisciplinary team (IDT) members shall be responsible for notifying the resident of resolution and indicate on the grievance form. Should resolution(s) not be satisfactory and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the federal survey results for all residents and visitors to view. The sample was 21. The census was 91. Observation of the front desk area on 1/23/26 at 10:30 A.M., showed no sign indicating the location of the facility's survey results. No survey results documentation was visible. During a group interview on 1/26/26 at 11:30 A.M., five out of five residents, whom the facility identified as alert and oriented, said they did not know where the survey results were located. During an interview on 1/29/26 at 2:07 P.M., Director of Nursing (DON) C said he/she expected the facility's survey results to be readily available to residents and family members. During an interview on 1/29/26 at 11:54 A.M., Administrator B said he/she updated the survey result binder this week and it was located at the front desk. There was no sign posted indicating where residents and family members could find the survey binder. He/She expected the survey binder to be readily available to residents and their family members.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment for three residents (Residents #78, #91 and #93). The facility also failed to keep the 200 hall shower room clean and odor free. The sample was 21. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Cleaning Resident's Rooms policy, undated, showed: -Policy: -Resident rooms at the facility are maintained and cleaned on a daily and weekly schedule; -Procedure: -Daily cleaning: -Clean the bathroom; -Dust the furniture, windowsill television and pictures; -Clean chairs, tables, and handrails with disinfection spray; -Clean door know, light switches and telephone with disinfecting spray; -Sweep and mop floors. Review of the facility's Bathroom and Shower Cleaning policy, undated, showed: -Policy: The bathrooms and showers rooms are maintained in a clan and sanitary manner and are cleaned on a daily basis; -Procedure: -Daily cleaning includes: -Emptying waste cans, -Servicing toilet paper holders;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective grievance process for residents and family members to voice grievances and prompt the facility to resolve grievances for one resident (Resident #44). In addition, five out of five residents who represent the resident council said the facility failed to properly follow up on grievances. The failure has the potential to affect all residents with grievances. The sample was 21. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Grievance and Missing Property policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: Residents and resident representatives have the right to voice concerns or grievances, which affect their lives at the facility, without fear of discrimination or reprisal; All residents, resident representatives, and families also have the right to report missing items or property.-Purpose: To provide an opportunity for residents, resident representatives, and families to present concerns or grievances to the proper authorities at the facility and to receive a response;-Procedure: Grievances may be presented to any staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete all required background checks for newly hired employees prior to hiring for 10 out of 10 employees sampled. The facility failed to check the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry (checks for Federal Indicators (FI) given to individuals found guilty of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property) for seven out of 10 employees and failed to check either a criminal background check or the Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR, checks both the criminal background check (CBC) and employee disqualification list) for eight out of 10 employees. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Employee Background Checks policy, undated, showed:-The facility is committed to maintaining high quality care and service while protecting its residents from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Accordingly, this policy sets forth the facility's process for conducting a thorough pre-hire background check of relevant individuals to ensure that relevant individuals:--Have not been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care that met professional standards of quality when staff failed to obtain weights as ordered for one resident (Resident #13) and failed to administer Vitamin D as ordered for one resident (Resident #78). The sample was 21. The census was 91. 1. Review of Resident #13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/17/25, showed:-admission date 8/29/25;-Diagnoses included heart disease, kidney disease, and high blood pressure. Review of the resident's medical record, showed:-An order, dated 10/21/25, for monthly weights;-An order, dated 12/17/25, weekly weights;-No weights documented August 2025 through January 2026. During an interview on 1/23/26 at 12:25 P.M., Certified Medication Technician (CMT) W said he/she helped obtain resident weights in January 2026. He/She documented the resident's weight on a piece of paper and handed the weights to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate activities of daily living (ADL) care to meet their needs, including showers, nail care, and assisting residents out of bed for four residents (Residents #93, Resident #12, Resident #17, and Resident #13). The sample was 21. The census was 91.Review of the facility's ADL policy, dated 7/21/25, showed the nursing staff will assist in bathing the residents to promote cleanliness and dignity. The Charge Nurse will be made aware of residents who refuse bathing. Review of the facility's Oral Hygiene policy, revised 7/1/25, showed the facility will provide oral hygiene to residents as directed by the care plan. Oral care will include cleansing the oral cavity and removing food and debris. This may reduce odors and infection and provide comfort. 1. Review of Resident #93's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/8/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent the risk of accidental hazards by failing to ensure staff used appropriate techniques during two transfers using a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift) (Residents #7 and #91) and during one assisted transfer without a gait belt (Resident #111). In addition, the facility failed to safely store a topical antiseptic solution by leaving it open in the room of a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #7). The sample was 21. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Total Lift Transfer policy, dated, 7/1/25 showed:-Policy:-The facility will utilize a total lift device on residents who are unable to assist with transfers;-Responsibility: Nursing employees, Nursing administration, Director of Nursing (DON);-Definitions: -Full body lift: A lifting device used to provide safety of resident/employees during transfers;-Procedure:-Position the lift near the receiving surface;-Lock the bed/chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nurse staffing on a 24-hour basis to care for resident's basic needs for three sampled residents (Residents #93, #12, and #17). The facility also failed to ensure sufficient therapy staff to provide speech therapy and restorative therapy. In addition, the facility failed to ensure new staff and/or agency staff were properly oriented. This practice had the potential to affect all residents. The sample was 21. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Facility Assessment, updated 12/18/25, showed:-People involved in completing: Administrator A, Director of Nursing (DON) C, and Director of Maintenance;-Date reviewed with Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee: 12/18/25;-Number of licensed beds: 117;-Average daily census: 100;-Average weekday admissions by shift: 3-4;-Average weekend admissions by shift: 0-1;-Average weekday discharges by shift: 3-4;-Average weekend discharges by shift: 0-1;-Assistance with activities of daily living monthly average:-Bed mobility sit to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 30 opportunities observed, four errors occurred, resulting in a 13.33% medication error rate (Residents #33, #34, #78, and #79). The census was 91. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Procedure Policy, undated, showed:-Purpose: To administer all medications safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms, and help in diagnosis;-Procedure:-Review the resident's medication administration record (MAR);-Read each order entirely;-Remove medication from drawer. Reach each label carefully;--When removing from drawer;-If there is any discrepancy between the MAR and the label, check the physician's order before administering the medication;-Obtain and record any vitals before as necessary prior to administration;-When giving an injection, site rotation is charted in the appropriate space on the MAR;-For medication that requires blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were complete, accurate, and readily accessible to staff and leadership following the transition from electronic medical record (EMR) Program A to EMR Program B. The facility failed to ensure records from the prior system were fully integrated into the current system. The facility failed to ensure Administration had direct access to historical clinical information. This breakdown in record management created barriers to timely access to critical resident information and placed residents at risk for gaps in care, treatment decisions, and continuity of services. The sample was 33. The census was 66. 1. Review of Resident #94's face sheet, dated 3/26/26, showed:-admitted on [DATE];-Diagnoses included essential tremor, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, enlarged prostate), bipolar disorder (mental condition that causes extreme mood swings), vascular dementia, chronic kidney disease, and pneumonia. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility arbitration agreement (a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several other individuals can make a decision about the dispute after receiving evidence and hearing arguments), provided to residents upon admission, allowed the resident or his/her representative to revoke the facility's arbitration agreement within 30 days of signature. This had the potential to affect all residents admitted to the facility who signed the arbitration agreement. The facility identified 11 residents admitted in the past 30 days. The census was 91.Review of the facility's admission Agreement, showed:-Arbitration Agreement: By signing this Agreement the Resident, and/or Authorized Representative agrees with the facility that any dispute between you and us, and any dispute relating to services rendering for any condition, and any dispute arising out of diagnosis, treatment or care of the Resident including the scope of this arbitration clause and arbitrability of any claim or dispute, against whomever made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer eligible residents for pneumococcal pneumonia (pneumonia caused by bacteria) and influenza (flu) vaccine for five out of five residents sampled for immunizations (Resident #12, #13, #8, #9, and #6). The census was 91. Review of the facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine policy, dated, 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: The opportunity to receive the pneumococcal vaccine will be extended to all residents; The facility will provide pertinent information regarding the risks and benefits of receiving the vaccine;-Procedure: Residents will be offered the pneumococcal vaccine upon admission and administration of additional doses will be completed in accordance of Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines; Obtain a consent; The resident and the resident's representative will be provided education per the CDC guidelines on the risks, benefits, and potential side effects of receiving the pneumococcal vaccine. Obtain a physician order; Document the immunization in the resident's medical record. Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of individual needs and preferences by failing to ensure call lights were in reach for two residents (Resident #95 and Resident #11) and failing to repair a shower in the 200 hall shower room timely, requiring one resident to go to another shower room that was located further from his/her room (Resident #44). The sample was 21. The census was 91. Review of the facility's Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response;-All staff will be educated on the proper use of the resident call system, including how the system works and ensuring resident access to the call light;-Each resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain records and accounting for resident trust prior to September 2025. Issues were found for eight of eight residents investigated for resident trust funds (Residents #64, #65, #52, #7, #82, #92, #94, and #100). The facility failed to ensure residents had signed authorization for management of personal funds, failed to prevent resident accounts from balance negatives prior to cash withdrawals and/or debits for three residents, and failed to apply applicable interest to resident accounts. The census was 91.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain records and accounting for resident trust prior to September 2025. Issues were found for eight of eight residents investigated for resident trust funds (Residents #64, #65, #52, #7, #82, #92, #94, and #100). The facility failed to ensure residents had signed authorization for management of personal funds, failed to prevent resident accounts from balance negatives prior to cash withdrawals and/or debits for three residents, and failed to apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a process to ensure refundable resident deposits were identified and returned upon discharge. This deficiency had the potential to affect recently discharged residents, which included one resident (Resident #129). The resident sample was 21. The census was 91. Review of the facility's admission agreement under the previous management company, revised on 3/22/23, showed:-To reserve a room, I agree to pay in advance: -A $6,000 interest free security deposit, which is refunded within 45 days after discharge, less balances from Medicare, insurance and hospice companies. The deposit is viewed as an asset by Medicaid and must be applied toward monthly charges to quality for Medicaid. The monthly charge for room and board starts the first day a bed is held in reserve. If the resident passes away before the admission, charges will be assessed for every day the room was held in reserve. Review of the Facility's current admission agreement, received 1/23/26, showed: -Nursing Facility, Financial, and Resource Agreement:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of 21 sampled residents had a signed advanced directive or received information about their right to formulate an advanced directive. The facility also failed to ensure code status sheets were located in the facility-designated binders on the hall (Residents #17, #52, #63, and #93). The sample was 21. The census was 91. Review of the facility's Advanced Directives policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of the facility to respect the resident's right of self-directed care including the right to issue advance directives on health care, to refuse/accept treatment, to make informed decisions, and/or appoint a health care agent to make decisions on behalf of the resident when the resident lacks the capacity to do so;-Upon admission, the facility will provide a resident who is medically deemed competent or resident representative, who does not have an existing advance directive, with written information and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to privacy during personal care and medical treatments when staff failed to close the door to one resident's room while performing dressing changes to their nephrostomy tubes (tube that is put into the kidney to drain urine directly from the kidney), leaving the resident exposed to the hallway during care (Resident #108). The sample was 21. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Catheter Care policy, last reviewed on 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: The facility will maintain consistent and adequate hygiene standards for residents with an catheters to maintain function and prevention of infection and complications.-Responsibility: Nursing staff, licensed nurses, nursing administration, and Director Nurses (DON);-Procedures included:--Provide privacy. Review of Resident #108's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/17/25, showed: -Cognitively intact;-Diagnoses included coronary artery disease (CAD, is a narrowing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of alleged abuse was reported to the facility Administrator and to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident #65). The census was 91. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: Facility staff, other residents, and staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual;-Procedure: The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) must be promptly notified of suspected abuse or incidents of abuse. If such incidents occur or are discovered after hours, the Administrator and DON must be called at home or must be paged and informed of such incident. The facility will initiate at the time of any finding of potential abuse or neglect, an investigation to determine cause and effect and provide protection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were investigated in a timely manner for two of 21 sampled residents (Residents #17 and #65). The census was 91. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: Facility staff, other residents, and staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual;-Procedure: The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) must be promptly notified of suspected abuse or incidents of abuse. If such incidents occur or are discovered after hours, the Administrator and Director of Nursing must be called at home or must be paged and informed of such incident. The facility will initiate at the time of any finding of potential abuse or neglect an investigation to determine cause and effect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had safe discharge plans with arrangements for services/outside resources to assist in transitioning back home, or documented discharge summaries for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for discharges (Residents #124 and #1). The sample 21. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Discharge Planning Policy, dated 7/2025, showed:-An interdisciplinary summary is completed on a resident upon discharge to assure the continuum care needs of the residents are met;-Responsibility Licensed Nurse, Social Services, Therapist, Registered Dietitian/Certified Food Service, Director, and Activities Director;-Guidelines:-A physician's order must be obtained;-Upon notification or impending discharge, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) should be notified to allow staff the opportunity to educate and implement a safe discharge. Social Work (SW) should coordinate the discharge planning process;-If the resident is relocating to another nursing home/assisted living,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #123) had baseline care plan completed within the first 48-hours of admission that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. The facility identified 11 newly admitted residents in the past 30 days. Of those 11, two were sampled and issues were found with one. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Comprehensive person-centered care plan policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Each resident will have a person-centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strength, preferences and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care. -A baseline Care Plan is developed within 48 hours. Developed initial goals based upon admission orders/residents' input and is record on the Baseline Care Plan User-defined assessment (UDA);-The interdisciplinary team along with the Resident and/or Resident Representative, will identify resident problems, needs, strengths, life…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a comprehensive care plan completed within 7 days of completion of the resident assessment and no further out than 21 days after admission, that would address individual care for four sampled residents (Residents #1, #4, #63, and #93). The sample was 21. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan policy, dated [DATE], showed:-Each resident will have a person-centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strength, preferences and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care;-The comprehensive person-centered care plan shall be fully developed within 7 days after completion of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) Assessment;-The interdisciplinary team (IDT) along with the resident and/or resident representative, will identify resident problems, needs, strengths, life history,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the body to drain urine from the bladder) care when staff failed to ensure catheter bags were positioned appropriately and failed to obtain physician orders for catheter use and care for two residents (Resident #500 and #518). The sample was 33. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Catheter Care policy, reviewed 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: Maintain consistent and adequate hygiene standards for residents with an indwelling catheter to maintain function and prevention of infection or complications. 1. Review of Resident #500's hospital discharge record, dated 3/4/26, showed:-Hospital problems included stroke, acute kidney injury, bladder cancer, urinary tract infection (UTI), wounds, and protein malnutrition;-Used a catheter for urinary output. Review of the resident's facility electronic physician order sheet (ePOS), showed:-An order, dated 3/4/26, to irrigate catheter with 100 milliliters (ml) of water every six hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ostomy (medical device used to collect bodily waste) care was provided by staff and physician orders were obtained for ostomy care for one resident who had an ileostomy (surgical procedure that creates an opening (stoma) in the abdominal wall, bringing the end of the small intestine to the surface to divert waste in an external pouch) (Resident #93). The sample was 21. The census was 91. Review of the facility's Pouch Changes - Ileostomy policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents who require colostomy services receive pouch changes consistent with professional standards of practice to minimize occupational exposure and the resident's skin exposure to fecal matter or urine;-Policy Explanation:-Ostomy care will be provided by licensed nurses under the orders of the attending physician. The order should include the type of ostomy, frequency of pouch change, and type of equipment. The nurse will allow the resident to perform as much care as possible in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #6) received appropriate gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a tube surgically inserted into the abdomen used for liquid nutrition, fluids and medications) care to avoid potential complications from the tube feeding. Facility staff failed to ensure the resident's head of bed was elevated to prevent aspiration (choking). Facility staff failed to label the tube feeding bag to ensure the tube feeding formula was not in use for an excessive amount of time to prevent spoiled formula. The facility also failed to include the resident's tube feeding care on the care plan. The sample was 21. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Tube Feeding policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: Residents with an order for tube feeding will be assessed and monitored by a Registered Dietician to ensure nutritional needs are being met;-The policy did not address positioning of the resident or the labeling of the tube feeding bag. Review of Resident #6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and document informed consent for the use of side rails, to document attempted alternative approaches prior to side rail use, and to assess for the use of side rails for three residents (Residents #63, #52, and #78). The sample was 21. The census was 91. Review of the facility's Bed Rail policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of this facility to utilize a person-centered approach when determining the use of bed rails. Appropriate alternative approaches are attempted prior to installing or using bed rails. If bed rails are used, the facility ensures correct installation, use, and maintenance of the rails;-As part of the resident's comprehensive assessment, the following components will be considered when determining the resident's needs, and whether or not the use of bed rails meets those needs. The resident assessment must include an evaluation of the alternatives that were attempted prior to the installation or use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were free from personal items and to ensure medications were stored securely and at proper temperatures, resulting in multiple medications being discarded. In addition, the facility failed to ensure medications were appropriately labeled with open dates and/or resident names. Four medication carts were observed, and problems were found with each. The census was 91. Review of the facility's Refrigerator Temperature Monitoring Policy, dated [DATE], showed:-Purpose: To ensure the safe storage of medications, vaccines, biologicals, and other temperatures-sensitive items in compliance with Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and applicable regulatory standards;-Scope: This policy applies to all refrigerators used to store medications, vaccines, laboratory specimens and patient-specific items within the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a urinalysis as ordered in a timely manner for one resident (Resident #63). The sample was 21. The census was 91. Review of the facility's Intake and Outtake Measurement policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: Obtain an accurate record of the resident's fluid Intake and output and information will be recorded as clinically indicated;-Procedure: Charge nurse will notify physician of any abnormality or significant imbalance between intake and output. Review of the facility's laboratory test policy, dated 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: Laboratory tests are completed as ordered by the physician;-Procedure: Licensed nurse will complete lab requisitions for routine laboratory test needing to be done on the day they are due. This will be done using the information on the lab scheduling/tracking form. Licensed nurse/designee will complete the appropriate lab requisition form. This will be completed prior to each lab day, using the information on the lab scheduling/racking form. Review of Resident #63's admission Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide therapy services as ordered for one resident (Resident #15) who received outside physical therapy (PT) due to inconsistent therapy provided by the facility. The facility also failed to update the resident's medical record to reflect outside therapy services. The facility also failed to offer speech therapy (ST) between 9/1/25 through 1/22/26. In addition, the facility failed to have an active restorative program in accordance with resident needs, placing residents at risk for avoidable decline. The sample was 21. The census was 91. Review of the facility's Therapy Services Policy and Procedures, reviewed 7/1/25, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide therapy services that promote optimal resident function, independence, safety, and quality of life. Therapy services shall be:--Provided under the direction of qualified and licensed therapists;--Based on physician orders and interdisciplinary assessment;--Coordinated with nursing, social services, and dietary departments;--Documented accurately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed routine inspections of bed/side rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify possible areas of entrapment to reduce the risk of accidents for three residents with side rails (Residents #63, #52, and #78). The sample was 21. The census was 91.Review of the FDA (Federal Drug Administration) guidance, Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, dated 3/10/06, showed:-It is suggested that facilities and manufacturers determine the level of risk for entrapment and take steps to mitigate the risk. Evaluating the dimensional limits of the gaps in hospital beds is one component of an overall assessment and mitigation strategy to reduce entrapment;-The population most vulnerable to entrapment are elderly patients and residents, especially those who are frail, confused, restless, or who have uncontrolled body movement;-Bed rails (commonly used synonymous terms are side rails, bed side rails, grab bars and safety rails), may be an integral part of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pain received pain medications as ordered by the physician. This affected one of three sampled residents (Resident #2). The census was 112.Review of the facility's Pain Management policy, dated 7/1/25, showed the following:-Policy: The facility will use a systematic approach to Pain Management; recognition, evaluation, treatment, and monitoring of pain. Individuals experiencing pain may receive pharmacological/non-pharmacological interventions to assist in pain management;-Responsibility: Nursing personnel, nursing administration, and Director of Nursing (DON);-Procedure: -Evaluate/Prevent: --Recognize when the resident is experiencing pain and identify circumstances when pain can be anticipated;--Evaluate resident for pain on admission and routine evaluations;--Manage/prevent pain, consistent with the comprehensive evaluation and plan of care, current professional standards of practice, and resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B was rough and mean to a resident during peri-care (Resident #1) and told a resident he/she did not take his/her religion seriously because he/she refused to go to church service (Resident #2). CNA B had a history of complaints from residents about being rough, bossy and intimidating. The census was 91.Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, revised 6/16/25, showed:-The resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility;-The resident has the right to exercise his/her rights as a resident of the facility;-The resident has the right to be free of interference, coercion, discrimination, and reprisal from the facility in exercising his/her rights and to be supported by the facility in the exercise of his/her rights;-The resident has a right to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized care plans, to address the specific needs of the residents, for three of three sampled residents in certified beds (Residents #2, #3 and #4) who were at increased risk of bleeding due to receiving anticoagulant treatment. The census was 82 with 33 in certified beds. Review of the facility's Care Plan policy, dated 2/20/25, showed it is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a residents medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs; and all services that are identified in their comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality. 1. Review of Resident #2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/25/24, showed: -Moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to discard outdated food and label, date, and cover food. Also, facility staff performed improper infection control practices while he/she prepared puree dishes and poured the food into plates. In addition, the facility also failed to ensure kitchen equipment was clean and in working condition. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen. The census was 81 with 38 residents in certified beds. 1. Observations on 5/2/24 at 9:17 A.M., 5/3/24 at 7:15 A.M., 5/4/24 at 3:04 P.M., showed the following: -Storage room: -A large can of potato salad, with a best buy date of 12/23 and 12/23/19 written on the outside of the can; -A large can of Campbells soup, with an expiration date of 3/26/23 and 12/30 written on the outside of the can; -A large can of V8 original drink mix with an expiration date of 2/13/23; -A large can of cherry pie filling with a best by date of 10/22; -Cooler: -A container of bread and butter slices without a date; -A container of kosher dill pickle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to reconcile the petty cash (a small amount of cash that is kept in a facility's business office to dispense to residents who have a resident trust account) on a monthly basis. The facility also failed to maintain enough funds in the resident trust to cover all residents with a resident trust for three months. The facility held funds for five residents. The census was 81 with 38 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 1/10/24, showed: -Manage you money: You have the right to manage your own money or to choose someone you trust to do this for you; -In addition, if you deposit your money with the nursing home or ask them to hold or account for your money, you must sign a written statement saying you want them to do this; -The nursing home must allow you access to your bank accounts, cash, and other financial records; -The nursing home must have a system that ensures full accounting for your funds and cannot combine your funds with nursing home's funds; -The nursing home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to check for a federal indicator (identifies when an employee who has ever held a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) certificate has ever been found to have abused, neglected, or misappropriated resident property) through the state Nurse Aide (NA) registry prior to hiring a new employee. In addition, the facility's policy failed to direct staff to check the NA registry on all employees prior to hire for three of five employees files reviewed. The census was 81 with 38 in certified beds. Review of the facility's undated Background Screening Investigation policy, showed: -Policy: Facility conducts employment background screening checks, reference checks and criminal conviction investigation checks on individuals making application for employment; -Procedure: The Staffing Coordinator, or other designee, conducts employment background checks, reference checks and criminal conviction checks on persons making application for employment with facility. Such investigations are completed prior to offer of employment; -For any individual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-07 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a tracking system to ensure 10 of 10 randomly selected Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) received the required annual 12-hour resident care training, tracked and calculated by hire date. The census was 81 with 38 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility assessment, showed: -Staff training and competencies: Abuse, neglect, exploitation and reporting; -Resident rights; -Pressure ulcer prevention; -Medication administration; -Dementia care and abuse prevention; -Care for persons with cognitive impairment; -Care for persons with mental and psychosocial disorder as well as history of trauma/Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event); -Implementing non-pharmacological interventions; -Falls; -Exercise and ambulation; -Range of motion; -Positioning residents; -Lifting and transfers; -Feeding assistance training; -Required in-services done yearly for all staff; -Nursing rounds/supervision done involving floor staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for infection prevention and control for three residents (Residents #9, #20, and #28). The facility failed to ensure the tubing for an indwelling urinary catheter (flexible tubing used to carry urine from the bladder into a drainage bag) did not drag on the floor. The facility identified two residents as having urinary catheters. Of those two, two were included in the sample and issues were identified with one (Resident #9). In addition, the facility failed to clean shared medical equipment between resident use, for two residents observed to be transferred with a mechanical lift (Residents #20 and #28). The census was 81 with 38 residents in certified beds. The sample was 12. 1. Review of the facility's Indwelling External and Suprapubic Catheter (flexible tubing inserted through the abdomen to carry urine from the bladder) policy, not dated, showed: -It is the facility's mission to allow residents comfort and dignity through the use of assistive technology such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 28 opportunities observed, 2 errors occurred, resulting in a 7.14% error rate (Resident #19). The census was 81 with 38 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility's Administering Medications policy and procedure dated, 11/17/2023: -Policy statement: medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -Insulin pens containing multiple doses of insulin are for single resident use only. Changing the needle does not make it safe to use insulin pens for more than one resident; -Insulin pens will be clearly labeled with the resident's name or other identifying information. Prior to administering insulin with an insulin pen, the Nurse will verify that the correct pen is used for that resident; -Policy did not address priming the pen prior to resident dose administration. Review of Manufacture How to Use Your Lantus (long-acting insulin) Pen, dated 2022: -Perform a safety test; -Dial a test dose of 2 units; -Hold pen with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible when staff failed to follow proper procedures during a mechanical lift transfer. An agency staff who was not trained on the facility's policies and procedures for a mechanical lift transfer, transferred a resident (Resident #1) and did not follow facility protocol, resulting in the resident falling out of a Hoyer Lift (full body mechanical lift). The sample size was three. The census was 98. Review of the facility's Hoyer Lift Transfer Procedure, revised 8/4/23, showed: -All Hoyer Lift transfers must be performed with two persons; -Open the base of the Hoyer to widest position and place base under the bed; -Make sure one of the employees is monitoring the residents head and protect the head from being bumped with the arms of the Hoyer; -Transport the resident slowly, keeping resident within the base of the Hoyer to prevent tipping; -After reaching destination, center resident and lower them by use of the down arrow on the hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-17 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) Form CMS-10055 Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) four of four residents (Resident (R) R151, R149, R99, and R102) reviewed for advanced beneficiary notices. Failure to provide the form could result in the resident or their responsible party not being aware of the reason services were ending or of the options and cost to continue to receive services. Findings include: Review of facility-provided undated policy titled ADVANCE BENEFICIARY NOTICE revealed To insure an Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) is obtained from Medicare beneficiaries when . wishes to bill for . services that may not be covered by CMS . Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN): An ABN is a written notice given to a Medicare Beneficiary . when . believes that Medicare will not pay for some or all of the services . and wishes to bill the patient for the provided services . The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure, for one of one resident (Resident (R) 153), observed for blood glucose [sugar] via fingerstick that the resident had a physician's order for the task and, for one of one resident (R100) observed for intramuscular (IM) injection, the medication vial was not cleaned with an alcohol pad (prior to withdrawal of R100's medication into the syringe). The facility's deficient practice increased R153's risk of complications of adverse medication reaction and R100's risk of infection. Findings include: 1. Review of Specimen Collection for Glucose Monitoring under Chapter 52 located in book titled Fundamentals for Nursing with a copyright date of 2019 revealed Monitoring blood glucose levels is an essential component in the care of clients who have diabetes mellitus . check the client's record and prescription . Frequency and type of test vary based on the goals of management and the complexity of the client's hypoglycemic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident (R) 12) reviewed for limited Range of Motion (ROM) was provided treatment/services to maintain/increase range of motion of his/her bilateral hands. The facility's deficient practice increased R12's risk of range of motion decline of his/her hands and contractures. Findings include: Review of Medical Surgical Nursing copyright 2022 under chapter 2 of the book titled Lippincott CoursePoint Enhanced revealed . Each joint of the body has a normal range of motion; if the range is limited, the functions of the joint and the muscles that move the joint are impaired, and painful deformities may develop . assess, plan and intervene to prevent complications of immobility . Deformities and contractures can often be prevented by proper positioning . At times, a splint (eg.,wrist or hand) may be made by the occupational therapist to support a joint and prevent deformity .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling catheter was anchored to prevent excessive tension on the catheter and the catheter was not routinely (monthly) changed for one of one resident (Resident (R) 41) reviewed for catheter cares. The facility's deficient practice increased R41's risk of urethral tears, dislodgement of the catheter, and urinary tract infections. Findings include: Review of Management of Patient's with Urinary Disorders under tab Chapter 49 located in Lippincott Course Point Enhanced 15th edition with copy date of 2022, revealed Patients at high risk for CAUTI [catheter acquired urinary tract infection] need to be identified and monitored carefully . The catheter is an object foreign to the body and produces a reaction in the urethral mucosa with some urethral discharge . The catheter is anchored as securely as possible to prevent it from moving the urethra . Special care should be taken to ensure that any patient is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist for two of five residents (Resident (R) 2 and R7) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure documented rationale for the physician's response was available for R7. Findings include: Review of facility-provided undated policy titled Psychotropic Drug Policy revealed . along with Physicians and mid-level providers will use psychotropic medications appropriately working with the interdisciplinary team to ensure appropriate use, evaluation and monitoring . facility to include regular review for continued need, appropriate dosage, side effects, risk and /or benefits . Efforts to reduce dosage or discontinue of psychopharmacological medications will be ongoing, as appropriate, for the clinical situation . Psychotropic medications include: anti-anxiety/hypnotic, antipsychotic and antidepressant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring for psychotropic medications was in place to maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being for one resident of five residents (Resident (R) 7) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of facility-provided undated policy titled Psychotropic Drug Policy revealed . along with Physicians and mid-level providers will use psychotropic medications appropriately working with the interdisciplinary team to ensure appropriate use, evaluation and monitoring . facility to include regular review for continued need, appropriate dosage, side effects, risk and /or benefits . Efforts to reduce dosage or discontinue of psychopharmacological medications will be ongoing, as appropriate, for the clinical situation . Psychotropic medications include: anti-anxiety/hypnotic, antipsychotic and antidepressant classes of drugs . Monitors psychotropic drug use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-11-17 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was complete and accurate and posted in a prominent place, in a readable format and readily available to residents and visitors. There were 46 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: During an observation/review on 11/14/22 at 9:45 AM of an untitled and undated document, located on the right side of the wall behind a plastic cover in the facility lobby, revealed the following information was excluded: a. resident census b. the total number of staff c. actual hours worked by the categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. During an observation/review on 11/15/22 at 12:00 PM of an untitled and undated document, located on the right side of the wall behind a plastic cover in the activities room, revealed the following information was excluded: a. resident census b. the total number of staff c. actual hours worked by the categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$172,400 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $172,400 — penalty dated 2026-01-29
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-29 for 57 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BLUE SKY BASIN, LLC — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 2 of 51.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GROVE OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2025
BLUE SKY BASIN LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025
DKDP MISSOURI LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025
DKYH MISSOURI LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025
SLOANS LAKE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025
BERGER, ELIOTIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2025
KLEINER, DAVIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025
PERLOW, BERNARDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025
JOHNSON, ERICAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2025
SAJID, RAJIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/20/2026
TORRES, ROXYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/20/2026
COMPLIANCE CONSULTING GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025
PRIME ADVISORY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025
SAUL N FRIEDMAN & COMPANYOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$304K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 28%Medicare 4%Other / private 68%

This home reported $304K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$378per resident / day
operating cost
$11,505per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$324per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265833. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next