Nodaway Healthcare
22371 State Highway 46, Maryville, MO 64468 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (660) 562-2876 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569, F0570)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (73%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 33.3% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 5.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.4% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 9.6% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.2% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 18.0% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 44.3% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.3% | 25.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.6% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.9% | 17.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.6% | 23.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.7% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.70 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 5.02 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
36.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 36.1%CMS range 25.2–46.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.3–19.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 4.8–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 32.6 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 73% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat one sampled resident, Resident #1 with dignity and respect when a staff member transferred the resident from a chair to bed without securing the assistance of another staff member or use a gait belt, as directed in the residents plan of care, and put the resident to bed when the resident was not ready to go to bed. This affected one of four sampled residents (Resident #1). The facility census was 20. On 4/21/2026, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 4/5/26. On 04/05/2026, facility administration was notified of the incident, an investigation immediately began, and corrective actions were implemented to include a facility wide in-service that included abuse, resident rights, compliance and ethics policy, elder abuse hotline Number, gait belts, and call lights. Additionally, nursing staff completed a full physical assessment of the resident, implemented close monitored for any outcome, and the staff member involved in the incident was suspended and later terminated. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 30. The facility did not provide a policy for RN coverage. Review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal data (PBJ - a report that provides staffing data set information submitted by nursing homes on a quarterly basis) for Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 - March 31) showed no RN coverage hours on 2/23, 3/2, 3/16, 3/29 and 3/ 30. Review of staffing schedule for February 2025 showed no RN on the day: 2/23. Review of the staffing schedules for March 2025 showed no RN on the following days: 3/2, 3/16, 3/29 and 3/30.During an interview on 8/5/25 at 9:52 A.M., the Regional Nurse said she knew something was not right with the PBJ and did not think it had been filled out correctly. During an interview on 8/7/25 at 11:53 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said:- The Administrator had been there since July of this year;- He/She had been at the facility since November of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to complete Tuberculosis (TB) skin testing for three out of ten employees. The facility additionally failed to establish and maintain an effective water management program to aide in identifying and reducing the risk of Legionella and other waterborne pathogens that can grow and spread and lead to Legionnaires' disease (a type of serious pneumonia caused by a type of bacteria called Legionella.) The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's Employee TB Screening and interpretation of Results Policy, Revised July 2010 showed: All employees shall be screened for tuberculosis (TB) infection and disease, using a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) prior to beginning employment. The need for annual testing shall be determined by the annual TB risk classification or as per State regulations. The facility will administer and interpret TB skin test in accordance with recognized guidelines and pertinent regulations. A qualified nurse or health practitioner interprets the TB skin test 48-72 hours (2-3 days) after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of the 12 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, (Resident #3 and #33) and/or their representative were informed of the risks and benefits of a physician ordered antipsychotic medication. This failure prevented the resident and/or their representative from knowing the risks and the benefits of using psychotropic medications. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's policy for antipsychotic medication use, revised December 2016, showed: - Antipsychotic medications may be considered for residents with dementia but only after medical, physical, functional, psychological, emotional psychiatric, social and environmental causes of behavioral symptoms have been identified and addressed. - Antipsychotic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review; - Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to promote an environment respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices, when six out of six residents in a group interview were concerned about specific aspects of their life when staff did not offer a bedtime snack to the residents. This potentially affected all residents who would like a snack. The facility census was 30. Review of facility Resident Nutrition Services Policy, dated November 2015, showed snacks are available to the residents 24 hours a day. The resident may request snacks as desired, or snacks may be scheduled between meals to accommodate the resident's typical eating patterns. Review of facility Resident Rights Policy, undated policy included federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as a resident or citizen of the United States, be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights, exercise hir or her rights without interferences,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, during a group interview six out of six participants said the facility failed to protect resident rights when the facility did not prominently display information on how to file a grievance or how to call or contact the Missouri Adult Abuse & Neglect hotline in the facility for its residents. The facility census was 30. Review of facility policy, Resident and Family Concerns and Grievances Policy and Procedure, dated 2020, showed the facility will notify residents, individually or through posting in prominent locations throughout the facility, of the right to file a grievance. The notification must include the following information: Contact information for the relevant state agency or Ombudsman program for filing a complaint. Review of facility policy, Resident Rights, not dated, showed; - Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. -These rights include the resident's right to: communicate with outside agencies (e.g., local, state, or federal officials, state and federal surveyors, state long-term care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain the privacy of three of the 12 sampled residents (Resident #15, #2 and #30), when staff failed to post signage at the front door, and outside each sampled residents room to indicate 24 hour camera surveillance was in progress and failed to obtain consents from (#15) and (#30)'s responsible party. The facility census was 30.The facility failed to provide a policy for video surveillance with or without audio.Interview, observation and record review of resident #15, on 08/05/25 at 1:45 P.M. showed: Resident is alert and orientated to self and place, uses a walker with ambulation and wants to be as independent as possible. Resident is his/her own person and able to make his/her own decisions. Resident has diagnosis of: Sequelae following Cerebrovascular disease, Foot drop,(Left), Muscle weakness, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease, Conversion Disorder with Seizures, Restless Leg Syndrome, Abnormalities of gait and mobility, Pain in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility staff failed to check the Certified Nurses Assistant (CNA) Registry for nine of 10 sampled staff to ensure they did not have a Federal Indicator (a marker given by the federal government to individuals who have committed abuse/neglect). this affected 10 of 10 sampled staff (Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN) B, Certified Medication Technician (CMT) A, Social Service Designee (SSD), Nursing A, Nursing B, and Nursing C, [NAME] A, Nursing Assistant (NA) A, Care Partner (CP)A, and Administrator 2. The facility also failed to have a criminal record check on file prior to employee's first date working for two of 10 sampled staff: CMT A and Nurse A. The facility census was 30.Review of facility policy, Abuse and Neglect Procedure, revised [DATE], showed pre-employment screening will be completed on all employees, to include:- Criminal History Check, Background Check, Reference check from previous employers, Professional licensure, certification, or registry check as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the bed hold policy, a discharge summary regarding Resident #8, and the reason for discharge to the resident's representative in writing, including the statement of appeal rights or the name, address, or telephone number of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (advocates for the residents in long-term care facilities) for (Resident #1, #4, #6 and #12) and failed to notify the Ombudsman of the discharge. This affected five of 12 residents sampled. The facility census was 30.Review of facility policy Transfer or Discharge Notice, revised 12/2016, showed:- The facility shall provide a resident and/or resident's representative with a thirty-day written notice of an impending transfer or discharge;- A notice will be given for the following reasons: transfer is necessary for the resident's welfare and their needs cannot be met in the facility, resident no longer needs the services provided by the facility, the safety of individuals in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan to meet preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs for three of 12 sampled residents when the facility failed to update a (Resident #3) care plan after a significant change, and when the facility failed to include the use of oxygen therapy in the care plans for (Resident #30 and Resident #31). The facility census was 30. Review of the facilities Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans policy showed: -The Interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident; -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; -Each resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan will be consistent with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Base on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good, grooming, personal hygiene, when the facility failed to provide proper peri care for four of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #3, #12 and #28), and when the facility failed to provide proper catheter care for resident #16. The facility census was 30. Review of facility Perineal Care policy, dated February 2018, showed: -For a female resident wash perineal area, wiping from front to back, separate labia and wash area downward from front to back; -If the resident has an indwelling catheter, gently was the juncture of the tubing from the urethra down the catheter about three inches. Gently rinse and dry the area; -For a male resident wash perineal area starting with urethra and working outward. 1.Review of Resident #28's Care Plan dated 06/26/2025 showed: -Resident was limited physical mobility related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed provide proper respiratory care when staff failed to date the oxygen tubing for two residents (Resident #7 and #30), failed to clean the oxygen concentrator filters for one resident (Resident #7), failed to have an oxygen filter installed for one resident (Resident #5), and failed to obtain an order for oxygen prior to administering to a resident (Resident #30). This affected three of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy, revised October 2010, showed:- Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration;- Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident;- Equipment and supplies: Portable oxygen cylinder strapped to the stand, nasal cannula, nasal catheter, mask (as ordered), humidifier bottle, No Smoking/Oxygen in Use signs, regulator, and PPE as needed;- Check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the failed to ensure staff discarded expired medications and biologicals stored in the medication room and in the nurse's medication cart. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's undated policy for Storage of Medications, showed:- The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner;- Drugs and biologicals shall be stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers;- Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels shall be returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing;- The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. 1. Observation and interview on 8/5/25 at 2:37 P.M., of the medication room showed:- One opened vial of Tuberculin, purified protein derivative,0.1 ml., dated 6/13/25. The label on the box…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when staff failed to discard expired leftovers in the refrigerator, failed to maintain proper standards of cleanliness and storage in the kitchen area, and failed to use proper handwashing hygiene in the kitchen. This affected all residents by putting them at risk for a food borne illness. The facility census was 30.Review of facility policy Bare Hand Contact with Food and Use of Plastic Gloves, undated, showed:- Single-use gloves will be worn when handling food directly with hands to assure that bacteria are not transferred from the food handler' hands to the food product being served;- Hands are to be washed when entering the kitchen and before putting on the single-use gloves and after removing single use gloves;- Anytime a contaminated surface is touched, the gloves must be changed, and hands must be washed;Review of facility policy Food Receiving and Storage, revised July 2014, showed:- Food services, or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0851 — patternElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data (a mandatory submission by nursing facilities to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services detailing facility staffing levels, including staff identification, hours worked, and job titles, on a quarterly basis correctly for Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 to March 31). The facility census was 30 The facility did not provide a policy for PBJ. Review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal data (PBJ - a report that provides staffing data set information submitted by nursing homes on a quarterly basis) for Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 - March 31) showed no RN coverage hours on 2/23, 3/2, 3/16, 3/29, and 3/ 30 and no licensed nurse on 1/25, 2/11, 3/13 and 3/29. Review of staffing schedule for February 2025 showed no RN on the day: 2/23. Review of the staffing schedules for March 2025 showed no RN on the following days: 3/2, 3/16, 3/29 and 3/30.During an interview on 8/5/25 at 9:52 A.M., the Regional Nurse said:- He/She knew something was not right with the PBJ and did not think it had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow care plan directions for maintaining and using hearing aids for one resident of 12 sampled (Resident #30). The facility census was 30. Review of facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised September 2013, showed the care plan will include measurable objectives and timeframes and describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being;Review of facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, revised March 2018, showed:- Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry ot activities of daily living (ADLs);- Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents including appropriate support and assistance with communication (speech, language, and any functional communication systems;1. Review of Resident #30's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards when staff did not implement new interventions to prevent falls for one of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #3), who was at risk for falls and who had experienced multiple falls and failed to update the resident's fall risk assessment with each new fall. The facility census was 30. 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] at 12:15 P.M. Review of the resident's progress notes showed:- 5/24/25 at 12:30 P.M., the resident was found on the right side of the bed on the floor. No injury noted;- 5/25/25 at 1:15 P.m., the resident had an unwitnessed fall. The resident was found on the floor, no injury noted. Review of the resident's fall risk assessment, dated 5/25/25 showed the resident scored 20 (indicated the resident was at risk for falls). Review of the resident's progress notes showed:- 5/27/25 at 6:50 A.M., a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) noticed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided for one resident, (Resident #1) when staff failed to obtain any medications for the resident for the first 48 hrs after admission from an acute hospital stay following a vehicle accident. The facility census was 39. Review of facility policy, protocol for pain management and as needed medication, undated, showed: -Pain management must be provided to a resident who requires such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences; -Nurses will complete a pain evaluation on each resident for pain upon admission to the facility every week for four weeks, at the quarterly review, whenever there is a significant change in condition, and when there is onset of new pain or worsening of existing pain. -The nurses will either use the FACES pain rating scale (for non-verbal or cognitively impaired residents or residents that do not speak English) or the 10 point pain intensity scale. -Nursing staff and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nebulizer tubing and a nebulizer mouthpiece were cleaned after use and stored in a manner to prevent potential contamination between uses for 1 (Resident #22) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Departmental (Respiratory Therapy)- Prevention of Infection, revised 11/2011, specified, The purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment, including ventilators, among residents and staff. The section of the policy addressing, Infection Control Considerations Related to Medication Nebulizers/Continuous Aerosol indicated, 3. After completion of therapy: a. Remove the nebulizer container; b. Rinse the container with fresh tap water; and c. Dry on a clean paper towel or gauze sponge. 4. Reconnect to the administration set-up when air dried. 5. Take care not to contaminate internal nebulizer tubes. 6. Wipe the mouthpiece with damp paper towel or gauze sponge. 7.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide personal funds and a final accounting within thirty days upon discharge. This affected two of five sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) Facility census was 38. Review of facility policy, Conveyance upon discharge, eviction, or death policy, dated 2019, showed: -Upon discharge, eviction, or death of a resident with a personal fund deposited with the facility, the facility shall convey within 30 days the resident's funds and final accounting of those funds, to the resident, his or her legal representative, or in the case of death, the individual, or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate, in accordance with state law. 1. Review of the facility's interim aging report, dated 8/21/24, showed the following residents had money in the facility's operating account: -Resident #1 discharged on 2/1/24, with a balance of $2,428.00; -Resident #2 discharged on 7/9/24, with a balance of $5,531.46. Review of Request for Resident Refund invoices showed: -On 7/16/24, Business Office Manager (BOM) submitted invoice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they used the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day on the day shift, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. The facility's census was 30. Review of the facility's undated policy regarding RN coverage showed the requirements for long term care facilities require that a skilled nursing facility provide 24-hour nursing services, an RN for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week (more than 40 hours a week), and that there be an RN designated as Director of Nursing (DON) on a full time basis. Review of the facility's December 2021 schedule sheets, which showed all nursing staff scheduled for the entire month of December, showed: - 12/8/21, 12/9/21, 12/21/21, 12/22/21, and 12/28/21 they only had an RN scheduled 4 hours during the day, from 2:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.; - On 12/15/21, they only had an RN scheduled 3 hours during the day, 3:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.; - On 12/14/21, and 12/27/21 the facility did not have an RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-03-21 · tag F0800 — widespreadProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they provided each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet to meet their daily nutritional and special dietary needs when staff failed to ensure they covered foods when transporting them from the kitchen to resident rooms and prepared the meals too far in advance. This affected all residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 30. The facility did not provide any dietary policies regarding covering foods during transport of when to prepare the meals. 1. Observation and interview on 3/16/22 at 10:26 A.M., the dietary manager (DM) said she already had to noon meal prepared and on the steam table. The evening cook would be starting his/her meal prepare around 3:00 P.M. Observation of the noon meal on 3/16/22 showed staff served the residents' choice meal for the noon meal, chili and a baked potatoes. The bake potatoes appeared to have shriveled from sitting on the steam table for too long. Observation and interview on 3/16/22 at 3:20 P.M. showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they stored, prepared, and distributed foods in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when staff did not date foods when opened, did not change gloves and wash their hands when moving from one task to another, and failed to keep all surfaces clean, all of which affected all residents who received food from the facility's kitchen. The census was 30. The facility did not provide any cleaning schedules. The facility did not provide a policy on hand washing and glove changes in the kitchen. The facility did not provide a policy to address dating foods when opened. 1. Observation on 3/14/22 at 10:20 A.M., during the initial tour of the kitchen showed: - The walking refrigerator: black cherry drink not dated, opened, two individual condiment cups not dated, ham slices in zip lock bag not dated and on top of defrosting vegetable soup; - The ultra skillet handles were greasy and sticky with thick black substance; - The controls on oven with thick black greasy residue; - The smoke…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-03-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their set Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) when they failed to maintain appropriate antibiotic tracking and use of the standard assessment and communication tool-SBAR for 3 residents (Resident #22, #24 and #27) out of 17 sampled residents. This had the potential to effect all residents. Facility census was 30. Review of facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship Program dated September 2017 showed in part: -The facility will use a standard assessment and communication tool for residents suspected of having an infection-SBAR. -Monitor both antibiotic use practices and outcomes related to antibiotics in order to guide practice changes and track the impact of changes. -The Infection Preventionist will be responsible for the ASP in the faciltiy i.e.: -Tracks antibiotic starts, resistance patterns, and/or increased usage rates. -Tracks the number of adverse events. - Monitor SBAR forms for completion 1. Record review of Resident #22 medical records showed: -Order for Macrobid (a prescription medication used to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-21 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they did not hold residents' monies separate from facility money when they did not reimburse residents and/or their responsible parties after the residents were discharged , which affected six residents sampled for resident trust fund (RTF) review (Residents #30, #31, #32, #33, #34 and #80). The facility's census was 30. Review of the Personal Funds Agreement, dated 2016, showed: - The facility offers the service of holding and managing residents' personal funds. Residents are not required, however to deposit their personal funds with us. They may manage their own funds or have a family member or other person do so. - I understand that within five (5) days of my discharge from the facility, an up to date accounting and the balance of my personal funds will be given to me, my guardian/conservator or any other person I designate in writing. - I understand that if I die with money in my personal funds account if I have received any Medicaid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-21 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a surety bond in an amount to cover any loss of theft to residents' money held in the facility's Resident Trust Fund (RTF) account which affected all residents who had money held in their RTF account. The facility's census was 30. Review of the facility's approved surety bond, approved 7/29/20, showed an approved amount of $15,000.00. Review of the RTF worksheet, completed with the Business Office Manager, on 3/21/22, showed: - The average monthly balance for the facility's interest bearing account and petty cash account of $12,580.84; - The approved bond amount for this average monthly balance (Grand Total rounded to the nearest thousand x 1.5 = required bond amount) should be at least $18, 871.50; $3871.50 more than the approved amount. During an interview on 3/21/22 at 2:13 P.M., the Business Office Manager said she completed the form and found they had the correct amount, but did not use the appropriate amount when figuring the ending balance for the petty cash account each month. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they developed person-centered, complete, accurate and individualized care plans based on residents' comprehensive care plans to address the specific needs of the residents which affected for five of 12 sampled residents (Residents #1, #4, #13, #22, and #27). The census was 30. The facility did not provide a policy for developing, implementing or updating residents' plans of care. 1. Review of Resident #13's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/24/21, showed: - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating moderate cognitive impairment; - Scored a 1 on the mood interview, meaning the resident is not at risk for depression; - Independent with bed mobility, moving on the nursing unit, eating; supervision with personal hygiene, toilet use, moving off the nursing unit, and walking in the corridor; limited assistance with dressing; - Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the resident's interests for three of 12 sampled residents. (Resident #27, #4, #22). The facility census was 30. Review of facility policy for Providing Activities, dated January 2019, showed: -It is the policy of the facility to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, the interests, and the physical, mental and psycho-social well-being of the residents. -The facility identifies each resident's interests and needs and involves the resident in an ongoing program of activities that is designed to appeal to his or her interests, and to enhance the resident's highest practicable level of physical, mental and psycho-social well-being. 1. Review of Resident # 27 Quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff, dated 2/18/22 showed: -BIMS of 1, unable to make decisions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-21 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they conducted assessments for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident and their representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation. This had the potential to affected all facility residents, and affected one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #25). The facility census was 30. The facility did not provide a policy on bed rails. 1. Review of Resident #25's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, date 2/4/22, showed: - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three which indicated severe cognitive impairment; - Independent with bed mobility, transfers; not steady when moving from a seated to standing position or moving from surface to surface, but steady with human assistance; - Diagnoses included unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (residual effects or conditions produced after the acute phase of an illness or injury…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a dementia care plan was developed for four sampled residents (Residents #14, #4, #22, and #27) with dementia diagnosis out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 30. The facility did not provide a policy to address behaviors or handling residents with dementia.1. Record review of Resident #14's admission Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Dementia with behavioral disturbances. Record review of the resident's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff for care planning dated 12/31/21 showed : -His/her BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 0 ( indicating morbid cognitive impairment) -Had an active diagnosis of Dementia; -He/she exhibited no behaviors; -He/she needed extensive assistance to dependence with Activities of Daily Living. (ADLs) Record review of the resident's Comprehensive Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they provided a notice before transfer and/or discharge for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #2) when they transferred the resident to the hospital. The facility census was 30. Review of the undated Facility Initiated Transfer or Discharge of Resident policy, showed on occasion, residents may be transferred or discharged for various reasons and these transfers and discharges may be initiated by the facility. The facility may initiate transfer or discharge for the following reasons including the transfer or discharge is necessary to meet the resident's welfare and the resident's welfare cannot be met in the facility. The procedure included: - Should the facility determine that transfer/discharge is necessary, the facility shall complete the following: *Resident, family and/or legal representative will be given 30 day notice prior to transfer or discharge when a resident's urgent medical needs require more immediate transfer; - The policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they provided a notice of their bed-hold policy before transferring for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #2) when they transferred the resident to the hospital. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's September 2017 Bed Hold/readmission Policy showed to comply with Federal rules, this facility is giving the letter to you and/or your resident representative at this time to inform you of the policy on bed holds and readmission to our facility. Residents and the resident representative will be sent a letter each time one of the following events take place: - Resident is transferred to the hospital; - Resident goes on a therapeutic visit; - Facility determines that a resident, who was transferred with an expectation of returning to the facility, cannot return and the facility shall initiate the notice of discharge. Review of Resident #2's significant change in condition Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they completed an accurate comprehensive assessment which reflected residents' status for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #25). The facility census was 30. The facility did not provide a policy on completing the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, for residents. Review of Resident #25's annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating moderate cognitive impairment; - No behaviors, such as physical or verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, did not reject care, and no change in current behavior status. - Independent with all activities of daily living (ADLs); - Always continent of bowel and bladder; - No falls since prior assessment.; - No ulcers, wounds and skin problems. Review of the resident's behavior flow sheet showed staff documented the following: - The resident was agitated 19 times between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and closed record review , the facility failed to ensure staff completed a comprehensive discharge summary for one of the two sampled closed records (Resident #9) to include appropriate information about the resident's diagnosis, course of illness/treatment or therapy, a post discharge plan of care to assist the resident to adjust to his/her new living environment when applicable. The facility census was 30. Review of facility policy titled Discharge Planning Policy, undated, showed the following: -To complete discharge planning on any resident where discharge is anticipated to home, another skilled nurse facility/nursing facility or other type post acute setting. -Discharge planning is a patient centered, interdisciplinary process that begins with an initial assessment of the residents potential needs at the time of admission and continues throughout the resident's stay. -Resident's and representatives should be informed of the appropriate community resources available and encouraged to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow safety standards and policy for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #1) who had no smoking assessment. Facility census was 30. Review of facility policy Smoking Policy dated October 2017 showed in part: -Any resident who smokes shall be assessed for their ability to smoke safely unsupervised. Assessments shall be conducted upon admission, quarterly and with changes in condition. -The assessment shall include cognition, communication/vision/hearing, physical abilities, safety risk history, and observations of smoking history. 1. Review of Resident #1 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff) dated 3/8/22 showed: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 5. (this indicates moderate to severe cognitive impairment). -Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia and Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance. -Needs supervision of staff with dressing and hygiene. Review of the resident's Care Plan dated 11/26/21 showed -Cognitive Defect: break things down into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from unnecessary drugs when staff failed to discontinue the use of as needed (PRN) opioids after 14 days or have the physician reassess the appropriateness of the continued use of the medication for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #2). The facility census was 30. The facility did not provide a policy to address the use of unnecessary drugs and discontinuing PRN opioids after 14 days. 1. Review of Resident #2's significant change in condition Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 12/3/21 , showed: - Long and short-term memory problems; - Extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transferring from one surface to another, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; - Diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease, - Not on scheduled pain medication, PRN medication and not received any non-medication interventions for pain; no presence of pain; - Had not received any opioids in the previous seven days; - Hospice. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from unnecessary drugs when staff failed to discontinue the use of as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications after 14 days or have the physician reassess the appropriateness of the continued use of the medication and failed to ensure they attempted an gradual dose reduction (GDR) in an effort to discontinue psychotropic drug use, unless clinically contraindicated for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #2). The facility census was 30. The facility did not provide a policy to address the use of unnecessary drugs, gradual dose reductions and discontinuing PRN opioids after 14 days. 1. Review of Resident #2's significant change in condition Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 12/3/21 , showed: - Long and short-term memory problems; - Extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transferring from one surface to another, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; - Diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease; - Exhibited behavior symptoms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice in the development of a coordinated plan of care for residents receiving hospice care. This affected two of 12 sampled residents. (Resident #2 and #22). The facility census was 30. Review of the undated Comparison of Facility/Hospice Responsibilities, part of the facility's contracted agreement with hospice providers showed: - Hospice plan of care (HPOC) must identify the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider is responsible for performing the respective functions that have ben agreed upon and included in the HPOC. - HPOC reflects participation by the hospice, facility, patient and patient's family. - Discussions of changes to the HPOC with the facility or patient; - Approval by Hospice of any changes to the HPOC prior to implementation. 1. 1. Review of Resident #2's significant change in condition Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolatedPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff who are not up-to-date with COVID-19 vaccination were routinely tested for COVID-19 according to their policy and county transmission rate. This affected four staff members and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 28. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19 Vaccination Policy, dated 2/2022, showed the following: - Purpose- In accordance with the facility's duty to provide and maintain a workplace that is free of known hazards, the facility was adopting the policy to safeguard the health of the employees and their families, customers and visitors and the community at large from the COVID-19 virus, that may be reduced by vaccinations. This policy will comply with all applicable laws and is based on guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and local Health authorities; - Scope- All employees are required to receive the COVID-19 vaccination as determined by CMS, unless a reasonable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0888 — isolatedEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to fully develop and implement their staff vaccination policy for COVID-19 when they did not ensure all required components were included in the policy and failed to implement a process for tracking and documenting the COVID-19 vaccination status for all staff. Facility census was 30. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19 Vaccination Policy, dated 2/2022, showed the following: - Purpose- In accordance with the facility's duty to provide and maintain a workplace that is free of known hazards, the facility was adopting the policy to safeguard the health of the employees and their families, customers and visitors and the community at large from the COVID-19 virus, that may be reduced by vaccinations. This policy will comply with all applicable laws and is based on guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and local Health authorities; - Scope- All employees are required to receive the COVID-19 vaccination as determined by CMS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0924 — isolatedPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the corridor was equipped with firmly secured handrails and handrails are in good repair on one side of the hall. The facility census was 30. Observations on 3/14/22 at 2:20 P.M. showed: - On the 200 hall, first handrail at central bath was loose. - The handrail by the soiled utility room is loose and cracked with jagged edges. During an interview on 3/21/22 at 2:05 P.M. the Maintenance Director said: - He/she does not do rounds and check handrails. - He/she was unaware some needed repaired; - Handrails should not be jagged or loose since the residents use those to stabilize when walking down the halls During an interview on 3/21/22 at 4:19 P.M., the Administrator said handrails should be checked and maintained in good condition.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BLUE SKY BASIN, LLC — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GATEWAY MO2 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/01/2022 |
| SLOANS LAKE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 63% | since 12/01/2022 |
| WYMORE, ADRIANE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/01/2022 |
| BERGER, ELIOT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 12/01/2022 |
| PERLOW, BERNARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 12/01/2022 |
| KLEINER, DAVID | Individual | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/01/2022 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $9K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265836. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.