Pleasant View Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 53.4 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.60 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.52 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Do Not Resuscitate Order's (DNR, medical order that instructs the health care provider not to do resuscitative measures if a person's heart stops) for residents (Resident #26 and Resident #47) were correct when the Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA)'s name was printed on the DNR instead of the name of the resident and when the facility failed to ensure the DNR orders for residents (Resident #46 and Resident #47) were not signed by the DPOA prior to the residents being declared incapacitated. This affected three of 13 sampled residents (Resident #26, Resident #46 and Resident #47) The facility census was 51. Review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives, dated December 2016, showed: -Advanced directives will be respected in accordance with the state and state law; -Upon admission the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept treatment; -If a resident is incapacitated and unable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and failed to ensure the bed's dimensions were appropriate for the resident's size and weight for three of 13 sampled residents (Residents #11, #17 and #47). The facility census was 51. The facility did not provide the requested policy on entrapment assessments. 1. Review of Resident #11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 02/26/25, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Substantial assist for toileting and bathing; -Partial assistance for bed mobility; -Bed rails not used; -Diagnoses included, dementia, other fracture and high blood pressure. Review of the resident's care plan dated, 05/01/25, showed: -Assist of two staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs); -Half bed rails to assist with bed mobility; -At risk for falls due to a history of falls. Review of the resident's Physician's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made two medication errors out of 26 opportunities for error which resulted in a medication error rate of 8%, this affected 3 residents of the 13 sampled residents, ( Residents #101, #46, #22). The facility census was 51. Review of the facility's undated Glucose Finger Stick policy, showed: Alcohol is used to clean the fingertip, allow it to dry completely because the alcohol may alter the first drop of blood if alcohol is used to clean the fingertips because alcohol may alter the results. 1. Review of Resident #101's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -Cognition intact; -Requires nursing assistance with self care and mobility; -Diagnoses: Diabetes, high blood pressure, renal insufficiency, parkinsons. Review of the care plan revised on 10/3/24 showed staff are to complete accuchecks two times a day to monitor blood sugar. Observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect when they stood to feed residents who required assistance (Resident #34 and #35) and when they failed to serve residents sitting at the same table at the same time during meal service (Resident #28, #17, #8, and #39. This affected six of twelve sampled residents. The facility census was 48. Review of facility policy, quality of life - dignity, dated August 2009, showed: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. -Residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times. -'Treated with dignity' means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth. 1. Review of Resident #34's Quarterly minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 4/4/24, showed: -He/She was cognitively intact. -He/She had clear speech; -He/She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable homelike environment when staff failed to replace trim missing from the base of the nurses station, replace damaged drywall on the side of nurses station, repair the medication cart that had several pieces of black duct tape on top left side, failed to repair a pillar near the left entrance of the dining room which had a 3-4 inch and 1 to 11/2 inch gouges of paint removed and missing paint. The facility failed to keep oxygen concentrators and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine dust free when a layer of dust was on Resident #22's oxygen concentrator and CPAP machine. The facility failed to keep Resident #200's dry wall seam was peeling from the ceiling. Additionally the facilty failed to repair a wall at the head of the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER] A that had scuff marks and gouges with the paint missing and white plaster showing. The facility census was 48. Review of facility policy, Quality of Life -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the record review and interview, the facility staff failed to check the Certified Nurses' Assistant (CNA) Registry for all staff to ensure they did not have a Federal Indicator (a marker given by the federal government to individuals who have committed abuse/neglect). This affected five of six sampled staff (RN A, [NAME] A, NA A, Maintenance Supervisor, and Care Partner A). The facility census was 48. Review of facility Policy, Abuse and Neglect, dated January 2017, showed: -It is policy to not employe 1) Individuals who have been found guilty by a court of law of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misapprorpiation of property or mistreatment 2) individuals with ahistory of certain criminal offenses 3) individuals on the Employee Disqualification List or who are listed on the state CNA registry as having been found to have committed abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of funds, or mistreatment 4) individuals whoa re listed as being (excluded' by the federal DHSS Office of Inspector General or 5) have a disciplinary action in effect against his or her professional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a written notice of transfer or discharge to residents or their responsible parties and the reasons for the transfer, in writing and in a language they understood. The notice should include the effective date of discharge or transfer, the location to which the resident is transferred or discharged , a statement of the resident's appeal rights, including he name, address (mailing and electronic mail), telephone number of the entity which receives requests and information on how to obtain the appeal form and assistance in completing and submitting it; the name, address (mailing and electronic mail) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and for residents with a mental disorder or related disabilities, the mailing, electronic mail (e-mail) address and telephone number of the agency for protection and advocacy for individuals with mental disorders established under the Protection and Advocacy for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed a Level I Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (indicated for any individual who may have an intellectual disability (ID), developmental disability (DD), or mental illness (MI). This affected two of 12 sampled residents, ( Resident #22 and #33). The facility census was 48. Review of the facility's undated policy for PASARR's (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are inappropriately placed in nursing [NAME] for long term care) showed: - The Nursing Home Reform Act was passed as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA - 87), and amended by Public Law 100 -203 and 101 - 508, creating the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([NAME]) process; - The purpose of the PASARR is to ensure that individuals being considered for admission to a Medicaid certified nursing facility (NF) are evaluated for evidence of possible PASARR conditions (serious…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care to include measurable objectives and appropriate timeframe's for five of 12 sampled residents (Resident #3, #6, #22, #34 and #39), when the facilty failed to address Hospice care for one resident (Resident #3), and when the facilty failed to address a pressure ulcer for one resident (Resident #6), and failed to address the use of oxygen and a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP, a machine that helps the resident breathe easier) machine for one resident (Resident #22). Additionally, the facilty failed to address the use of cane rails (a device that enables the residnet's mobility) for two residents (Resident #34 and #39). The facility census was 48. Review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016, showed: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetable to meet the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff followed professional standards of care for four of 12 sampled residents (Resident #18, #22. #35 and #46) when staff failed to ensure blood sugars were checked 30 minutes prior to meals which affected two residents (Resident #18 and #35), and failed to obtain a physician's order to check blood sugars for one resident who was receiving insulin (Resident #46) and when staff failed to obtain physician's orders for the use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine (a machine that helps the resident breathe easier) and for changing the oxygen tubing one resident (Resident #22). The facilty census was 48. Review of the facilty's Medication Administration and Maintenance Policy, dated October 2017, showed: -No medication or treatment shall be given without an order from a person lawfully authorized to prescribe such and the order shall be followed; -No medications will be left unattended or unobserved by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BLUE SKY BASIN, LLC — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $142K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO