No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Stonebridge Florissant

6768 North Highway 67, Florissant, MO 63034 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (314) 741-9101 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (314) 741-9101 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (76%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6854 Parker Road
Pharmacy
6999 Parker Rd · (314) 438-1375 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
175 Flower Valley Shopping Ctr · (314) 837-7771 · Call to confirm hours
Park
13002 Bellefontaine Rd · (314) 544-5714 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.8%18.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%18.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.1%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.3%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.9%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.5%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.3%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.8%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.8%2.2%1.4%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.04U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.3–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.30
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
75.9%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 71.0 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 76% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-22)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to mail delivered on Saturday. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who received mail at the facility. The census was 66. During a group interview on 8/20/25 at approximately 9:45 A.M., five residents, whom the facility identified as alert and oriented, attended the group meeting. All five residents said mail was no longer delivered on Saturdays. The mail is placed in the office, which was closed on the weekends, then distributed to the residents on Monday. One resident said this was frustrating because packages often arrive, and they can't access it until Monday. During an interview on 8/22/25 at 10:37 A.M., the Activity Director initially said mail was delivered on Saturdays and distributed as it arrived. The main office was closed on the weekend, but the mail carrier delivered it to the East side of the facility. However, they had not received any mail on Saturdays lately. She later clarified she spoke with the receptionist, who confirmed the post office did stop delivering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The census was 66.Review of the facility's Daily Census, dated 8/17/25, showed:-Available beds: 109;-Percent of occupancy: 61.5%. Review of the facility's payroll-based journal (PBJ) report, showed:-No RN hours on Saturday, 1/11/25;-No RN hours on Sunday, 1/12/25;-No RN hours on Saturday, 1/25/25;-No RN hours on Sunday, 3/9/25. During an interview on 8/20/25 at 12:30 P.M., the Administrator said the facility did not have any documentation or time sheets to show the facility had an RN on the days listed on the PBJ report. During an interview on 8/22/25 at 3:13 P.M., the Administrator said he expected to have an RN in the facility at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure third party liability (TPL) forms were completed for the final accounting for residents who expired, within 30 days. This affected two of three sampled residents who expired and had money in their accounts (Residents #74 and #75). The sample size was 17. The census was 66.Review of the facility's Resident Trust Fund Account Policy and Procedure, revised 2/2025, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of the facility to manage personal funds of our residents, upon request, and written authorization of the resident or legal representative. Funds will be managed in accordance with Federal and State Regulations;-Procedure: Upon the death of a resident with a balance in the Resident Trust Fund, the facility will complete a form and submit to Department of Social Services, Missouri Healthnet Division. The form shall be submitted within 30 days from the date of the resident's death. 1.Review of Resident #74's medical record, showed:-Resident expired on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the notice of the bed hold at the time of transfer to the hospital for two of 17 sampled residents (Residents #68 and #32). The census was 66. Review of the facility's Bed Hold policy, dated October, 2017, showed:-Policy Statement: Our facility shall inform residents upon admission and prior to a transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave of our bed-hold policy. Bed hold status exists when a resident temporarily leaves the facility for medical or other therapeutic reasons and their return is anticipated. Hospitalizations are examples of leaves;-Policy Interpretation and Implementation; -Upon admission and when a resident is transferred for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the facility will provide information regarding the bed-hold policy to the resident or representative in a written format that is understood by the resident or representative; -When emergency transfers are necessary, the facility will provide the resident or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document physician orders were verified for one resident (Resident #74) admitted for respite care. The sample was 17. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Admissions and admission Agreement Policy, dated February 2025, showed: Prior to or at the time of admission, the resident's attending physician must provide the facility with information needed for the immediate care of the resident, including orders covering at least: medication orders, including (as necessary) a medical condition or problem associated with each medication; and routine care orders to maintain or improve the resident's function until the physician and care planning team can conduct a comprehensive assessment and develop a more detailed Interdisciplinary care plan. Review of the facility's Reconciliation of Medications on admission Policy, dated revised 2017, showed:-Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to ensure medication safety by accurately accounting for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards when staff failed to do neurological check (neuro-checks, an assessment completed by nursing staff to monitor for changes in the resident's neurological (nervous system) status) after an unwitnessed fall for one resident (Resident #74). The sample was 17. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Fall policy, dated revised April 2022, showed:-The staff will evaluate, and document falls that occur while the individual is in the facility; for example, when and where they happen and any observations of the events, etc. Review of the facility's Neurological Assessment policy, dated revised October 2010, showed:-Purpose: the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for neurological assessment: when following an unwitnessed fall;-General guidelines: neurological assessments are indicated: following an unwitnessed fall;-When assessing neurological status always include frequent vital signs. Particular attention should be paid to widening pulse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice, when staff failed to document a thorough assessment of a wound weekly and failed to transcribe treatment order for another wound when the resident returned from the hospital for one resident (Resident #33). The sample was 17. The census was 66.Review of the Wound Care policy, dated revised October 2018, showed:-Documentation: the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record, if the resident refused the treatment and the reason(s) why;-Reporting: Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the wound care;-Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. Review of the facility's Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol policy, dated revised March 2020, showed:-The nurse shall describe and document/report the following: full assessment of the pressure sore including location, stage, length, width and depth, presence of exudate or necrotic tissue;-The physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary medications as ordered by the physician. In addition, they failed to notify and document the physician was made aware of the missed medications for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident #74). The census was 66. Review of the facility's Administering Medications Policy, dated revised December 2012, showed:-Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed;-Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame;-Medications must be administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meals);-If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administrating the medication shall document appropriately in the clinical chart. Review of the facility's Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose Level, dated revised October 2011, showed:-Purpose: The purpose of this procedure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free of accidents and injuries when a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) left a resident (Resident #7) unattended, rolled to his/her side on a low air loss mattress (LAL, a mattress designed with a system of air cells that are constantly inflated and deflated to prevent and treat pressure injuries (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on skin)), causing the resident to fall out of his/her bed on to a fall mat. The facility also failed to ensure residents were assessed immediately after a fall for injury and failed notify the Primary Care Physician (PCP), the resident's responsible party (RRP) and a member of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) after a fall because the CNA failed to immediately report the fall to the charge nurse for one resident (Resident #7) who sustained a head injury. The sample size was three. The census was 70. The Administrator was notified on 4/21/25, of the past non-compliance. The facility responded appropriately when they were made aware of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement timely and appropriate interventions to prevent potential falls and injury for one resident (Resident #1) who had one fall mat next to the left side of the bed. Resident #1 had a fall from the right side of the bed that did not have a fall mat, which resulted in injury. The facility additionally failed to adequately assess resident falls by ensuring residents received treatment and care in accordance with acceptable standards of practice when the facility failed to complete post (after) fall 72 hour monitoring report (neurological (neuro) checks - pulse (P), respiration (R), and blood pressure (BP) measurements; assessment of pupil size and reactivity; and equality of hand grip strength) if the fall was unwitnessed or if the resident had an incident in hitting their head for three residents (Residents #2, #3 and #4), post fall initial clinical assessments for four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4), skin assessments for two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide eight hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 18 out of 38 days reviewed for staffing. This had the potential to cause unmet health needs for all residents. The census was 85. Review of the Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff Policy, dated revised 1/31/23, showed: -Except when waived, the facility must use the services of a Registered Nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. Review of the facility's daily staffing patterns, dated 1/22/24 through 2/28/24, showed: -On 1/22/24, 1/23/24, 1/26/24, 1/27/24, 1/28/24, 1/30/24, 2/2/24, 2/6/24, 2/9/24, 2/10/24, 2/11/24, 2/13/24, 2/16/24, 2/20/24, 2/23/24, 2/24/24, 2/25/24 and 2/27/24, there was no RN coverage. During an interview on 2/27/24 at approximately at 9:30 A.M., the scheduler said the facility had one RN and when he/she was off, the Director of Nursing or the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse would cover. During an interview on 2/27/24 at 1:03 P.M., the Administrator said the facility had one RN and, in their absence, the facility did not have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program to reduce the growth/spread of Legionella (a bacterium that can live and grow in water systems and causes Legionnaires Disease (a severe form of pneumonia caused by Legionella bacteria)) and other opportunistic pathogens in the building's water system. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The sample was 24. The census was 85. Review of the facility's Water Management Policy, dated September 2022, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to establish water management plans for reducing the risk of Legionellosis and other opportunistic pathogens in the facility's water systems based on nationally accepted standards; -Definitions: - Legionellosis refers to two clinically and epidemiologically distinct illnesses: Legionnaires' disease, which is typically characterized by fever, myalgia (muscle aches and pain), cough, and clinical or radiographic pneumonia; and Pontiac fever (a mild flu-like illness caused by exposure to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for residents when staff failed to ensure common areas were free from strong urine odors that did not dissipate throughout the investigative process. The census was 85. Review of the facility's Facility Responsibilities Policy, dated September 2022, showed: -Safe Environment. The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment; -The facility will provide: a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his/her personal belonging to the extent possible; -Housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Observation on 2/22/24 at 8:35 A.M. and at 9:44 A.M., showed a large yellow soiled utility bin outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. A strong smell of urine was present in the hallway from room [ROOM NUMBER] to the nurse's station, outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) received personal hygiene assistance in accordance with their personal needs when one resident was observed with a soiled brief for an extended amount of time (Resident #46). In addition, the facility failed to provide showers for two residents (Residents #20 and #41) and failed to properly wash one resident's dentures (Resident #29). The sample size was 24. The census was 85. Review of the facility's ADL Care of the Resident Policy, revised December 2018, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to provide ADL care to residents to ensure needs are met daily; -Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: -Each resident's physical functioning will be assessed in accordance with the facility's assessment procedures; -The resident, to the extent possible, and/or the family/representative will be included in setting goals of care related to ADLs/physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate and competent staffing to meet the needs of residents when call lights were not answered in a timely manner for residents, including Resident #46 and #41. The sample size was 24. The census was 85. Review of the facility's Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff Policy, dated revised 1/31/23, showed: -The facility will supply services by sufficient numbers of each of the following personnel types on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care plans; -Providing care includes, but is not limited to, assessing, evaluating, planning, and implementing resident care plans and responding to resident's needs. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment, updated 1/19/24, showed: -The facility had two nursing units, an East and [NAME] wing; -Based on the current population as of 1/31/24, showed: -Bathing: 67 residents needed assistance of 1-2 staff and 13 were dependent; -Dressing: 57…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored per acceptable standards of practice. The facility identified eight medication/treatment carts and two medication rooms. Four of the eight carts and one medication room were checked for medication storage. Issues were found in one medication room, two medication carts and one treatment cart. Staff failed to date an opened vial of tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD, used to diagnose silent (latent) tuberculosis (TB) infection) solution, artificial tears (eye drops used to lubricate dry eyes and help keep moisture on the outer surface of eyes), and Miralax polyethylene glycol powder (used as a laxative to treat occasional constipation or irregular bowel movements). In addition, the staff failed to keep one treatment cart clean from spilled iodine solution (antiseptic for minor cuts and abrasions). The census was 85. Review of the facility's Storage of Medication Policy, revised 7/10/22, showed: -Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explicitly inform the resident or his or her representative of their right not to sign an arbitration agreement (a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several other individuals can make a decision about the dispute after receiving evidence and hearing arguments) as a condition of admission, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at the facility, for three of 25 sampled residents (Residents #87, #82 and #26). The census was 85. Review of the facility's Arbitration Agreements Policy, dated September 2022, showed: -Policy: This facility asks all residents to enter into an agreement for binding arbitration. We do not require binding arbitration as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at, this facility; -Definition: -Arbitration is a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several other individuals can make a decision about the dispute after receiving evidence and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed routine inspections of bed frames, mattresses and bed/side rails as a part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for four of 24 sampled residents (Residents #29, #61, #20 and #41). The census was 85. Review of the facility Proper use of Side Rails Policy, dated September 2022, showed; -Statement: It is the policy of this facility to utilize a person-centered approach when determining the use of bed rails. Appropriate alternative approaches are attempted prior to installing or using bed rails. If bed rails are used, the facility ensures correct installation, use, and maintenance of the rails; -Definitions: -Bed Rails are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed. They are available in a variety of types, shapes, and sizes ranging from full to one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth lengths. Also, some bed rails are not designed as part of the bed by the manufacturer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to uphold one resident's rights (Resident #46) by turning off the resident's call light without providing assistance to the resident or notifying staff the resident needed assistance, resulting in the resident having to wait an extended amount of time before staff provided assistance. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity when a staff member interacted inappropriately with a resident who required assistance with his/her clothing (Resident #40). The sample size was 24. The census was 85. Review of the facility's Resident Right's policy, dated September 2022, showed: -Policy: The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing, in a language that the resident understands, of his or her rights and all the rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility; -Resident Rights: The resident has the right to a dignified existence,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized comprehensive care plans to address specific needs of the residents for three of 24 sampled residents (Residents #29, #26 and #41). The census was 85. Review of the facility Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team Policy, revised [DATE], showed: -Policy: Our facility's care planning/interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident; -A comprehensive care plan for each resident is developed within seven (7) days of completion of the resident assessment (Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff); -The policy failed to show when a care plan should be updated and failed to show who was responsible for updating the care plan. 1. Review of Resident #29's annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Cognitively impaired; -Activities of daily living (ADL), chair/bed transfer,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner to prevent the risk of accidents and injury for one resident who was transferred using an unsafe technique (Resident #17). The census was 85. Review of the facility's Mechanical Lifting Machine Policy and Procedure, revised July 2017, showed: -The purpose of this procedure is to establish the general principles of safe lifting using a mechanical lifting device. It is not a substitute for manufacturer's training or instructions; -At least two nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift; -Mechanical lifts may be used for tasks that require: -Lifting a resident from the floor; -Transferring a resident from bed to chair; -Lateral transfers; d- Lifting limbs; -Toileting or bathing; -Repositioning; -Types of lifts that may be available in the facility are: -Floor-based full body sling lifts; -Overhead full body sling lifts; and -Sit-to-stand lifts. -Lift design and operation vary across manufacturers. Staff must be trained and demonstrate competency using…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #83), who received tube feeding (supplies liquid nutrition) through a gastronomy tube (g-tube, a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for the administration of food, fluids and medicine) received the appropriate treatment and services when staff failed to keep the resident's head elevated while tube feeding formula infused and provided care with the resident laying flat while tube feeding formula infused. The sample size was 24. The census was 85. Review of the facility's Enteral Nutrition policy, revised January 2014, showed: -Policy Statement: Adequate nutritional support through enteral feeding will be provided to residents as ordered; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation; -The interdisciplinary team, including the Dietician, will conduct a full nutritional assessment within current initial assessment timeframes to determine the clinical necessity of enteral feedings. The assessment will include; -Evaluation of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a stop date of 14 days or less on an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (a chemical substance that changes brain function and results in an alteration in perception, mood, consciousness or behavior) for one resident (Resident #84). The sample size was 24. The census was 85. Review of the facility's Use of PRN Psychotropic Drugs policy, dated October 2017, showed: -Policy Statement: Resident's drug regiment will be free from unnecessary drugs, including unnecessary psychotropic drugs; -PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days, except as provided if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days. He or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order; -PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days and cannot be renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluates the resident for the appropriateness of that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records are maintained that are complete and accurately documented for two residents (Residents #84 and #59). The sample was 24. The census was 85. The facility did not provide a policy for transcribing physician's orders, as requested. 1. Review of Resident #84's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff, dated 11/23/23, showed: -Should brief interview for mental status be conducted? No (resident rarely/never understood); -Diagnoses included: anemia (low red cell count), high blood pressure, diabetes, and dementia; -Received hospice care; -Pain frequency: occasionally. Review of the physician order sheet, in use at the time of survey, showed: -An order for: 9/20/2023 Morphine Sulfate Solution (pain medication) 20 mg/5 mL, give 0.25 ml by mouth every 4 hours as needed for shortness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was admitted with a Foley (brand name) catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder, used to drain urine from the body) for diagnosed bladder disease received catheter care per standards of practice. The facility did not document catheter output. The resident experienced a change in condition, was sent to the hospital, where hospital staff drained purulent and foul smelling urine from the resident's bladder (Resident #1). This affected one out of two residents the facility identified as using catheters. The census was 85. Review of the urinary catheter care policy, undated, showed: -Purpose: to prevent catheter associated urinary tract infections (UTI); -General guidelines: -Input/output: observe the resident's urine level for noticeable increases or decreased. If the level stays the same, or increases rapidly, report it to the physician or supervisor. Maintain an accurate record of the resident's daily output per the policy. Review of Resident #1's medical record, showed: -re-admitted :…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-25 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents could safely administer their own medications for three of three residents observed with medications or treatments in their room or left at their side (Residents #34, #10 and #308). The census was 81. Review of the facility's Self-Administration policy, revised December 2016, showed: -Policy Statement: -Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -As part of their overall evaluation, the staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident; -If the resident is able and willing to take responsibility for documenting their self-administration of medications, the resident will be instructed on how to complete a record indicating the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for two residents (Residents #11 and #6). The facility failed to develop resident care policies for restorative services, based on professional standards of practice, including who may provide specific treatments. The facility identified 23 residents as having contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). The sample was 19. The census was 81. 1. Review of the Department of Health and Senior Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Resident Census and Condition of Residents form CMA-672, completed by the facility staff and dated 5/17/21, showed: -Mobility: Residents with contractures: 23; -Of the total number of residents with contractures, how many had a contracture(s) on admission: 23. On 5/21/21 at 9:39…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there would be a correct emergency response for one resident (Resident #29), to comply with an order for do not resuscitate (DNR, instructions to health care providers not to do cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if the heart and respirations stop) due to having two active and opposing code statuses, DNR and full code. The sample was 19. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Do Not Resuscitate Order policy, dated February 2014, showed our facility will not use CPR and related emergency measures to maintain life functions on a resident when there is a DNR order in effect. Review of Resident #29's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated [DATE], showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of a possible score of 15. A BIMS score of 8-12, showed moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #29's electronic medical record, reviewed on [DATE], showed: -A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one resident's representative (Resident #43) regarding a change in condition, which required placing the resident on suicide watch. The sample size was 19. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Change in a Resident's Condition or Status policy, revised November 2019, showed the following; -Policy Statement: -Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (examples given, changes in level of care, billing/payments, residents rights, etc.); -Policy Interpretations and Implementations: -The Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or on-call physician when there has been: -A significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition; -Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, the Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse will notify the resident's family or representative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to respect residents' right to personal privacy during personal care for two of six residents observed during personal care (Residents #207 and #448). Staff left one resident's genitals exposed to the roommate during care when they failed to pull the privacy curtain completely around the bed and exposed a resident's chest to an open window as a car was observed to pull into the facility parking lot. The sample was 19. Census was 81. Review of the facility's untitled and undated policy, provided by the facility as the perineal care (cleansing of the surface area between the thighs, extending from the pubic bone to the tail bone) policy, showed: -Purpose: To provided cleanliness and comfort to the resident, aid in the prevention of skin irritations, infection and to observe the resident's skin condition; -Close the door and pull the privacy curtain. Review of the facility's Resident Rights, provided to the residents upon admission and available…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized care plans, to address the specific needs of the residents regarding wounds, transfer status, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), incontinence, colostomy (a surgical procedure that brings one end of the large intestine out through the abdominal wall) care, emergency code status, oxygen use, weight loss, dietary needs, hospice services and falls for 11 residents (Residents #100 #101, #207, #348 , #349, #27, #39, #10, #249, #400 and #405). The sample was 19. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, revised on 12/2016, showed: -Policy statement: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -Policy interpretation and implementation: -The interdisciplinary team (IDT) is to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided according to acceptable standards of clinical practice. The facility failed to ensure treatment orders were transcribed correctly and followed as ordered for one resident (Resident #27). Staff also failed to follow physician orders for physician follow up, diet orders and application of heel protectors (Residents #200, #250 and #100). In addition, facility staff failed to accurately assess the access site for one resident (Resident #250), clarify diet orders and obtain an admission weight (Residents #249 and #251). The sample was 19 and the census was 81. 1. Review of Resident #27's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 12/9/20, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Independent with activities of daily living (self-care activities); -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, diabetes, anxiety, depression, bipolar, venous insufficiency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate discharge procedures and complete discharge and/or transfer documentation. This affected three of three reviewed closed records (Residents #1, #9 and #398). The sample was 19. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Transfer and Discharge Policy dated revised November 2019, showed no mention of discharge summaries, recapitulation of the resident's stay, final summary of the resident's status and reconciliation of pre- and post-discharge medications. 1. Review of Resident #1's closed record, showed the following: -admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]; -discharged to hospital emergency room on 3/10/21; -Diagnoses included Bipolar disorder, epilepsy and depression. Review of the resident's nursing note dated 3/10/21, showed: -Resident will be sent out to hospital for a psych evaluation and treatment due to explosive behavior towards another resident; -Resident is agreeable to go; -Ambulance called for pick-up and ER called…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and monitor and reassess for further decline for two residents (Residents #400 and #401) that were experiencing a significant change in condition out of 19 sampled residents. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Change in Resident's Condition or Status Policy, revised [DATE], showed: -Policy statement: -- Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.); - Policy Interpretation and Implementation; --The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a: --significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition; --need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly; --refusal of treatment or medications two (2) or more consecutive times); --need to transfer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 29 opportunities observed, four errors occurred, resulting in a 13.79% error rate (Resident #301). The sample was 19. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Administering Medications through an Enteral Tube policy, revised on 12/2012, showed: -Purpose statement included: -To provide guidelines for the safe administration of medications through enteral tube; -Preparation included: -Verifying that there is a physician order for the procedure; -Reviewing the care plan to assess for special needs; -Assembling equipment and supplies; -General guidelines included: -Following the medication administration guidelines in the policy Administering Medications; -Requesting liquid forms of medications from the pharmacy; -Do not add medication directly to enteral feeding formula; -Do not mix medications together prior to administering them through an enteral tube and to administer each medication separately; -Check with the pharmacy and/or check the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented, for three residents (Residents #301, #27 and #10). The sample was 19. The census was 81. 1. Review of Resident #301's medical record, showed diagnoses included stroke, gastrostomy status (having a gastric tube (g-tube) a tube inserted into the stomach through the abdominal wall to provide food, nutrition and medications), heart disease, high blood pressure, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), seizures, and dementia. Review of the resident's electronic physician order sheet (ePOS), showed: -An order, dated 2/26/21, for Norco (narcotic pain medication that contains hydrocodone and acetaminophen) 5-325 milligrams (mg) every four hours as needed per g-tube. Observation on 5/18/21 at 7:27 A.M., showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H administered the resident's routine medications. LPN H said the resident asked for an as needed pain pill, so he/she will administer a Norco tablet. LPN H obtained one Norco 5-325 mg tablet, crushed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to exercise standard infection control and prevention precautions while providing personal care to two of six residents (Residents #207 and #448). Staff did not perform appropriate hand hygiene and glove changes while providing personal care to both residents and used a soiled washcloth to wash multiple areas of the body. In addition, staff did not handle a visibly stool-soiled washcloth in a manner consistent with acceptable practices for Resident #207. The sample was 19. The census was 81. Review of an untitled and undated policy, provided by the facility as the perineal care (cleansing of the surface area between thighs, extending from the pubic bone to the tailbone) policy, showed: -Purpose: To provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, aid in the prevention of skin irritations, infections and to observe the resident's skin condition. -Preparation included gathering: -A wash basin; -Towels; -Washcloths; -No rinse Peri-wash;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STONEBRIDGE SENIOR LIVING — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIERMAN, MARKIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/27/2005
MILLER, BETHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/17/2023
BRIDGE REHABILITATION INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
ELDERCARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/14/2017
ENTERPRISE BANK & TRUSTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/10/2023
AMIN, IQBALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2008
BUTZ, GREGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/15/2020
COOPER, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/19/2022
DOERHOFF, ERICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
PATEL, KOMALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/29/2023
THAYER, JEANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/25/2016
LIERMAN FAMILY CO III LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2004
WIPFLI LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$904K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 89%Medicare 3%Other / private 8%

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $904K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$217per resident / day
operating cost
$6,588per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$211per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265365. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next