Stonebridge Owensville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 86.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 131 beds and averages 72.0 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 59 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to safely transfer one resident (Resident #1) out of two sampled residents in a manner to prevent accidents when staff failed to use a gait belt during a transfer which resulted in a fracture. The facility's census was 73. The administrator was notified on 11/26/25 of past Non-Compliance which occurred on 11/16/25 when the administrator implemented new policies and procedures to ensure the nursing staff safely transferred residents. Staff were in-serviced on 11/16/25 regarding how to safely transfer a resident.1. Review of the facility's Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents policy, dated 07/2017, showed to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality of care, this facility uses appropriate decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents. Manual lifting of residents shall be eliminated when feasible. The policy did not contain direction for staff regarding when to use a gait belt.Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) remained free from accidents when staff failed to prevent Resident #1 from ingesting Resident #2's medications. The facility census was 83. The administrator was notified on 04/08/25 of past Non-Compliance which occurred on 03/29/25. when Resident #1 ingested Resident #2's medications. Staff assessed the resident, and notified the required parties and agencies. The administrator immediately in-serviced all nursing staff in-serviced nursing staff on medication administration. Staff corrected the deficient practice on 4/02/25. 1. Review of the facility's Administering Medications Policy, updated 12/2012, showed staff are to verify the resident's identity three times before administering the medication. Review showed staff are to check the medication label to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. Review showed, during medication administration, no medications are kept on top of the cart,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to designate a person to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services with the appropriate qualifications, when the facility did not employ a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional full-time. This failure has the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 72.1. Review of the facility's policy titled Food Services Manager, updated 09/28/22, showed the Food Services Manager may serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services who must at a minimum meet one of the following qualifications:-A certified dietary manager (CDM), or;-A certified food service manager, or;-Has similar national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body, or;-Has an associates (or higher) degree in food service management or hospitality, if the course includes food service or restaurant management from an accredited institution, and;-Has two or more years of experience in the position of director of food and nutrition services in a nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the mechanical dishwasher operated according to manufacturer's instructions in a manner adequate to prevent cross-contamination of kitchen wares. This failure has the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 72.1. Review of the facility's policy titled Dishwashing Machine Use, revised March 2010, showed: -The operator will check temperatures using the machine gauge with each dishwashing machine cycle, and will record the results in facility approved log;-The operator will monitor the gauge frequently during the dishwashing machine cycle. Inadequate temperatures will be reported to the supervisor and corrected immediately;-The supervisor will check the calibration of the gauge weekly by running a secondary thermometer through the machine or using commercial temperature test strips using manufacturer's instructions;-If hot water temperatures do not meet requirements, cease use of dishwashing machine immediately until temperatures are adjusted. Review of the manufacturer's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to properly clean and maintain wheelchairs for three residents (Resident #41, #45 and #37) of a sampled of 20 residents. The facility census was 72. 1. Review of the Facility's policy titled, Wheelchair Cleaning Procedure, undated, showed staff are to make sure no visible dirt, foot, etc. on any part of the wheelchair. Provides wheelchair cleaning schedule to cover all wheelchairs in the facility to be cleaned once a week. 2. Review of the Facility's policy titled, Creating a New Work Order in Technology Efficiency Life Safety and Services (TELS), undated, showed staff are directed how to place a work order for maintenance, when staff observe items needing to be repaired. 3. Review of Resident #41's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, dated 03/23/26, showed staff assessed the resident as follows:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Maximal assistance from staff member with eating;-Dependent on staff member for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to screen eight employees (Registered Nurse (RN) AA, Laundry Aide Z, Laundry Aide X, Dietary Aide Y, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) S, [NAME] V, Nurse Aide (NA) T and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) U) out of ten new employees prior to employment to determine if the employees had indicators on the CNA Registry, Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR), Criminal Background Check (CBC) and/or Employee Disqualification List (EDL). The facility census was 72. 1. Review of the Facility's policy titled, Background Screening Investigations, dated March of 2019, showed the facility conducts employment background screening checks, reference checks and criminal conviction investigation checks on all applicants. For purposes of this policy direct access employee means any individual who has access to a resident or patient of a long-term care (LTC) facility or provider through employment or through a and has duties that involve (or may involve) one-on-one contact with a patient or resident of the facility or provider, as determined by the state…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use proper hand hygiene and provide perineal care in a manner to reduce the risk of infection for one resident (Resident #32) out of three sampled residents, facility staff failed to use Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (an infection control practice that requires staff to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) (protective equipment such as gowns, gloves, goggles, and masks used to prevent or minimize exposure to hazards) for one resident (Resident #66) out of three sampled residents; and facility staff failed to implement appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of communicable diseases when staff failed to screen five staff (Registered Nurse (RN) AA, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) S, [NAME] V, Nurse Aide (NA) T, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) U) out of ten staff for tuberculosis (TB), a contagious, air-borne bacterial infection primarily affecting the lungs, in accordance with facility policy. The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to document a complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment tool), when they did not accurately code anticoagulant use for two residents (Resident #5 and #6), oxygen and/or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP - Machine that keeps the airways open during sleep for persons with sleep apnea) use for two residents (Resident #1 and #4), falls with injury for one resident (Resident #3), and a psychiatric diagnosis for one resident (Resident #41) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 72. 1. Review of the facility policy titled, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, dated July 2017, showed the facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. The assessment coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring that resident assessments are submitted in accordance with current federal and state guidelines. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to develop measurable goals and interventions for comprehensive care plans and update existing care plans to reflect care needs for four residents (Residents #4, #11, #23, and #41) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 72.1. Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 09/22, showed the care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs, and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care; -The Comprehensive care plan will describe at a minimum, the following: -The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; -The residents' goals for admission, desired outcomes, and preferences for future discharge; -The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide an ongoing activity program designed to meet the residents' interest, mental, and psychosocial well-being on the weekends for three residents (Resident #4, #23, and #28) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 72.1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Life Enrichment Program, dated 10/2017, showed facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as well as encourage both independence and interaction within the community. 2. Review of the facility's Activity Calendar, dated February 2026, showed: -Saturdays, 02/07, 02/14, 02/21, 02/28 Games/Puzzles;-Sundays, 02/01, 02/15 Games/Puzzles;-Sunday, 02/08 Superbowl Sunday 5 P.M. Wear your Colors;-Sunday, 02/22 Church everyone. Review of the facility's Activity Calendar, dated March 2026, showed: -Saturdays, 03/07, 03/14, 03/21, 03/28 Games, Puzzles, Read a book;-Sundays, 03/01, 03/08, 03/15, 03/22 TV,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide care and services to meet professional standards in regard to the use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device, the standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea using a mask and gentle air pressure to keep airways open during sleep, when facility staff failed to obtain an order for the use of the CPAP, and include the use of CPAP on the resident's care plan, for one resident (Resident #1) of two sampled residents. The facility census was 72. 1. Review of the facility policy titled CPAP/Bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) Support, dated March 2025, showed the following: -Review the physician's order to determine the oxygen concentration and flow, and the Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) pressure for the machine; -Wipe machine with warm, soapy water and rinse at least once a week and as needed; -Humidifier: use clean, distilled water only in the humidifier chamber, clean humidifier weekly and air dry; to disinfect, place vinegar-water solution (1:3) in a clean humidifier,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete entrapment assessments for five residents (Resident #11, #32, #63, #66, and #70) who used bed rails out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 72. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Proper Use of Side Rails, dated 09/2022, showed:-The resident assessment should assess the resident's risk of entrapment between the mattress and bed rail or in the bed rail itself;-Inspecting and regularly checking the mattress and bed rails for areas of possible entrapment;-Ensuring the bed frame, bed rail, and mattress do not leave a gap wide enough to entrap a resident's head of body, regardless of mattress width, length, and/or depth;-The maintenance director, or designee, is responsible for adhering to a routine maintenance and inspection schedule of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails.2. Review of Resident #11's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 03/25/26, showed staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$20,383 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,015 — penalty dated 2025-11-26
• $6,368 — penalty dated 2025-04-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STONEBRIDGE SENIOR LIVING — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO