Stonebridge Maryland Heights
2963 Doddridge Avenue, Maryland Heights, MO 63043 · For profit - Corporation · 223 certified beds · (314) 291-4557 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.3% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.1% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.4% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.6% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.2% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.5% | 25.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.2% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.7% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.3% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 12.2% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 50.0% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.8% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.3% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.69 | 2.11 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.40 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
30.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 30.8%CMS range 17.8–49.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.3–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 63.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 9.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 15.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 4.5–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 223 beds and averages 142.2 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 81 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident was provided with adequate supervision and staff oversight when the resident wandered outside and was brought back to their secured housing unit after approximately five to ten minutes of being outside unsupervised (Resident #1). The resident knocked on the door of a different housing unit and was brought back to their unit by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The sample was 9. The census was 136. The Administrator was notified on 3/26/26 of the past non-compliance. The facility in-serviced nursing staff on alarms and monitoring exits when alarms by the doors are making noise. They were in-serviced on identifying residents at risk of elopement and those who having exit seeking behavior. They were also given mock elopement drills to ensure the facility policy is followed when an alarm goes off or a resident is found to be missing. The deficiency was corrected on 3/25/26. Review of the facility's Elopement Policy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical status for one resident (Resident #1), per facility policy when the resident experienced a hypoglycemic episode and became unresponsive. The resident experienced a second hypoglycemic episode on the following shift, required life saving measures, and was sent out to the hospital urgently. The sample size was 8. The facility census was 141.Review of the facility's Change in a Resident's Condition or Status policy, dated [DATE], showed the nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition. Review of facility's Diabetes Clinical Protocol policy, dated [DATE], showed:- Risk of hypoglycemia should be considered in any treatment plan, as it is a significant and high-risk complication of treatment. It may be necessary to accept somewhat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records for all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation, for four out of six medication carts reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents with orders for controlled substances. The census was 150.Review of the facility's Controlled Substances policy, revised 2016, showed:-Policy Statement: The facility shall comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Schedule II (substances with a high potential for abuse and addiction but also have accepted medical use in treatments) and other controlled substances;-Policy Interpretation and Implementation:-Only authorized licensed nursing and/or pharmacy personnel shall have access to Schedule II controlled drugs maintained on premises;-The Director of Nursing Services will identify staff members who are authorized to handle controlled substances;-Controlled substances…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards when staff failed to administer and document medications as ordered by the physician for six of seven sampled residents (Residents #6, #2, #4, #5, #3 and #1). The census was 150. Review of the facility's Administering Medications policy, revised 2012, showed:-Policy Statement: Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed;-Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer and document the administration of medications may do so; -The Director of Nursing Services will supervise and direct all nursing personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions; -Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame; -Medications must be administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders). 1. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the main kitchen was labeled, dated, and disposed upon expiration. These failures had the potential to increase the prevalence and spread of foodborne illnesses for 140 of the 142 facility residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy dated September 2022 titled Food Safety Requirements indicated the facility should label, date, and monitor refrigerated food so it is used by its use-by-date. Open foods should be covered or in tight sealed containers. During an observation of the kitchen on 01/27/25 at 10:00 AM the following opened items were observed and verified by the Dietary Manager (DM) in the kitchen reach-in refrigerator: One container of unidentified white sauce with no label or date or discard date. One quart of Thick and Easy orange juice with no date. Instructions on the bottle indicated the product was to be used within 10 days of opening. Opened package of hot dogs with no date. The package was opened and left uncovered. An opened gallon of milk with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide knives with meals for two residents (Resident (R) 56 and R107) and staff was observed to stand while feeding (R) 22. These failures to promote dignity in dining had the potential to affect the 38 residents in the dining room. Findings include: Review of the facility policy dated January 2009 tilted Dining Room Audits indicated the Food Service Department should ensure the residents needs are met, and that dining is a pleasant experience.residents at each table should be served together and table should be in a homelike setting. During an interview on 01/28/25 at 12:27 PM, R56 stated that they never give knives at meals, and it made her feel like a child. During an interview on 01/28/25 at 12:30 PM, R107 stated that they never get knives with their meals. R107 stated that he is a grown man and feels like they should get a knife even if they do not use it. During a meal observation on 01/28/25 at 5:10 PM, residents were observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-05 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure six of seven (Residents (R)121, R5, R65, R107, R7, and R136) reviewed for care planning of 33 sampled residents was afforded the right to participate in their care planning process. This failure placed the resident at risk of not being aware of the goals and outcomes of their care. Findings include: 1. Review of R121's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of anemia, orthostatic hypotension, and generalized weakness. Review of R121's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/24/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. This represented R121 was cognitively intact. Review of R121's Care Plan Sign in Sheet provided by the facility revealed the only documentation of a care plan meeting being held in 2024 was dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure third party liability (TPL) forms were completed within 30 days for the final accounting for residents who expired. This affected 12 residents who expired and had money in their accounts (Residents #301, #302, #303, #304, #305, #306, #307, #308, #309, #310, #311 and #312). The financial sample was 12. The census was 146. Review of the facility's Resident Trust Fund Account Policy and Procedures, revised [DATE], showed the following: -Policy: It is the policy of the facility to manage personal funds of our residents, upon request and written authorization of the resident or legal representative. Funds will be managed in accordance with Federal and State Regulations; -Procedure: Upon discharge of a resident with a balance in the Resident Trust Fund, the facility will provide a final accounting within thirty days. If the facility is the Representative Payee for the resident, the facility will refund the balance to Social Security. If we are not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-05 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) website, and policy review, the facility failed to issue the appropriate notice for termination of Medicare part A benefits for three (Resident (R)92, R1, and R49) residents reviewed for beneficiary notification out of a total sample of 33 residents. These failures had the potential to result in a lack of understanding of appeal rights and/or the termination of the current level of care against the residents'/representative's wishes. Findings include: Review of the CMS site, Form Instructions Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) OMB Approval Number: 0938-0566 accessed at https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-general-information/bni/downloads/abn-form-instructions.pdf on 06/04/24 revealed, The beneficiary or his or her representative must choose only one of the three options listed in Blank (G). Unless otherwise instructed to do so according to the specific guidance provided in these instructions, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of resident preferred activities three residents (Resident (R)27, R93, and R137) reviewed for activities in sample size of 33 residents. This failure placed R27, R93 and R137 at risk for increased feelings of isolation, depression, helplessness, and boredom. Findings include: 1. Review of R27's Resident Face Sheet located in the Resident tab, in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include but not limited to unspecified psychosis, anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, restless legs syndrome, schizoaffective disorder, and insomnia. Review of R27's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/14/24 and located in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) tab of the EMR, revealed she scored 14 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated she was cognitively intact. The MDS did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. A total of five errors occurred out of 33 opportunities for error due to residents not receiving their medications that were ordered and one medication not being the ordered strength, for one resident (Resident (R)50) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility medication error rate was 15.15%. This failure had the potential to affect the accurate dosing of medication administered to the residents. Findings include: During medication administration observation on 01/29/25 at 8:37AM, Certified Medical Technician (CMT)3, administered/applied a four percent lidocaine patch to R50's right knee. Review of R50's Physician Orders dated May 31, 2024, in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Orders tab indicated the physician's order was for a five percent lidocaine patch to R50's right knee. Further review of the Physician's Orders reveled physician orders for Fexofenadine HCl Tablet 60 MG BID (twice a day), Spironolactone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed and food preferences were honored for four residents (Resident (R)5, R65, R56, and R107) reviewed out of a total sample of 33 residents. The failure placed 140 of the 142 residents in the facility at risk of nutritional problems and dissatisfaction with their meals. Findings include: Review of the facility policy dated October 2017 titled Menus indicated the menus would be followed and provide a variety of foods and be approved by the Registered Dietitian (RD). Review of the facility policy dated October 2017 titled Food and Nutrition Services Staffing indicates the facility must take into consideration the preferences of each individual. Review of the week one menu provided to the survey team indicated that on 01/27/25 the lunch meal would be spaghetti with meat sauce, Italian tossed salad, brownie, and breadstick. An observation of the meal at 11:55 AM revealed the resident received peas and carrots…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of the Dietary Manager's (DM) job description, the facility failed to provide palatable meals for four of four residents (Residents (R) 56, R9, R54, and R107) who complained their meals were not appetizing out of a total sample of 33 residents. This failure increased the risk of residents not being satisfied with their meals. Findings include: During an interview on 01/28/25 at 11:48 AM R56 stated that the food was horrible. R56 stated that she keeps food in her room so she can have something to eat when the meal tastes bad. The meal observation on 01/28/25 at 5:10 PM revealed patty melt, French fries, vegetable soup, chicken dumpling soup and a mixed fruit cup was served to residents. During an observation on 01/28/25 at 5:55 PM, R9 was observed licking the bread. R9 stated that she could not eat the sandwich because the bread was tough and soggy. R9 was observed to drink the soup and leave the table without finishing the meal. During an observation on 01/28/25 at 6:10 PM, R54 was observed throwing his sandwich off his plate. R54 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor the use of antibiotics for three of three residents (Resident (R)86, R81, and R102) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship of a total sample of 33 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program [IPCP], revised 11/2024, revealed . Antibiotic Stewardship: a. An antibiotic stewardship program will be implemented as part of the overall infection prevention and control program. b. Antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use will be implemented as part of the antibiotic stewardship program . During an interview on 01/29/25 at 3:55 PM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) was asked to provide the facility's documentation of the antibiotic stewardship program from 01/01/24 through 12/31/24. The IP provided documentation dated 07/01/24 through 12/31/24. The IP confirmed that when she began as the IP, she was provided the facility's Infection Control Log and confirmed the log did not contain the required start and end date of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was assessed for self-administration of medications prior to medications being left at the bedside for one of one resident (Resident (R)68) reviewed for self-administration out of a total sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential for the medication errors to be made. Findings include: Review of R68's Face Sheet located under the Resident Info tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R68 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, and morbid obesity. Review of R68's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/01/25 and located under the MDS tab in the EMR revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated that R68 was cognitively intact. Review of R68's Physician Orders located under the Orders tab in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident (R)121). This failure reflected R121 was receiving care or treatments that was inaccurate. Findings include: Review of R121's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of anemia, orthostatic hypotension, and generalized weakness. Review of R121's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/24/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. This represented R121 was cognitively intact. R121 was also coded as receiving dialysis while a resident in the facility. Review of R121's Physician Orders located under the 'Orders tab in the EMR revealed no orders for dialysis. During an interview on 01/27/25 at 4:43PM, R121 stated, I have never been on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I screen was completed prior to admission for one of four residents (Resident(R) 112) reviewed for PASARR out of a total sample of 33 residents. This created a potential failure to identify what specialized or rehabilitative services the resident needed and whether placement in the facility was appropriate prior to admission. Findings include: Review of R112's Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, moderate, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, with fluctuations. Review of R112's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/06/25 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed she scored five out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines during a wound care observation for one of three residents (Resident (R)1) reviewed for wounds out of 33 sampled residents. This failure had the potential for infections to be spread to vulnerable residents in a high-risk population. Findings include: Review of R1's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure. Review of R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/01/24 revealed one stage four and one unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of R1's Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab in the EMR and dated 09/04/24 with a focus of wound management. Interventions were If drainage present, obtain order for a culture. Measure ulcer on at regular intervals [sic]. Provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify one resident's representative (Resident #1) of a newly acquired skin condition. The sample size was five. The census was 142. The Administrator was notified on 10/23/24, of the past non-compliance. The facility in-serviced nursing staff regarding notification and documentation of the notification to residents' responsible parties, regarding any new skin conditions or refusals of care concerning skin treatments. The deficiency was corrected on 9/26/24. Review of the facility's Acute Condition Changes policy, revised December, 2015, showed physicians and resident representatives shall be contacted in the case of an acute condition change. Review of the Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/7/24, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Diagnoses included: Peripheral vascular disease (PVD, a disease that restricts blood flow to the lower extremities), lung…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) with a pressure wound (skin or soft tissue injury that develops with prolonged periods of pressure over specific areas of the body) received the necessary treatments and services to promote healing by not thoroughly documenting skin assessments and wound progress and descriptions. The sample size was five. The census was 142. The Administrator was notified on 10/23/24, of the past non-compliance. The facility in-serviced nursing staff regarding completion and documentation of skin assessments, assessments and documentation of new wounds and the progress of the wounds, and the protocols to follow if wound healing is not progressing. The deficiency was corrected on 9/26/24. Review of the facility's Pressure Ulcer and Skin Breakdown policy, revised March, 2020, showed: -Assessment and Recognition: -The nurse shall describe and document/report the following: Full assessment of pressure sore including location,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents food that is palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature for eight of 29 sampled residents (Residents #36, #123, #66, #122, #102, #47, #136 and #58) and for the residents who received hall trays. The census was 145. 1. Review of the facility's Resident Nutrition Services policy, revised July 2017, showed the following: -Policy: Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: The multidisciplinary staff including nursing staff, the attending physician and the dietitian will assess each resident's nutritional needs, food likes, dislikes and eating habits. They will develop a resident care plan based on this assessment. Residents shall receive prompt meal service and appropriate feeding assistance. Reasonable efforts will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a homelike environment. The facility failed to keep soiled linen carts out of resident rooms. The facility also failed to ensure main entrances, dining room, hallways, and resident rooms were free of odors. The census was 145. Review of the facility's routine cleaning and disinfection policy, revised October 2022, showed: -Policy statement: It is the policy of this facility to ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to prevent the development and transmission of infections to the extent possible; -Routine cleaning and disinfection of frequently touched or visibly soiled surfaces will be performed in common areas, resident rooms, and at the time of discharge; -Cleaning considerations include, but not limited to, the following: -Dry cleaning procedures will be conducted before wet procedures; -Clean from areas that are visibly clean and least likely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program based on resident preferences, to support residents in their choice of activities and meet the needs of the residents. The facility failed to provide adequate organized activities in the evenings and on the weekends. The resident council representatives reported activities to be insufficient. In addition, residents observed and interviewed reported concerns with the activity program (Residents #36, #47, #102, #135, #108, #64 and #58). The census was 145. Review of the facility's Activity Evaluation policy, revised June 2018, showed: -Policy Statement: In order to promote the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of residents, an activity evaluation is conducted and maintained for each resident at least quarterly and with any change of condition that could affect his/her participation in planned activities; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation included: -An activity evaluation is conducted as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-15 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure side rails were accurately assessed as a necessary device prior to installation and use. The facility also failed to obtain physician's orders for the use of side rails and failed to document usage in the residents' care plan for seven of 29 sampled residents (Residents #102, #27, #73, #45, #58, #84 and #59). The census was 145. Review of the facility's Proper Use of Side Rails policy, dated September 2022, showed: -Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to utilize a person-centered approach when determining the use of bed rails. Appropriate alternative approaches are attempted prior to installing or using bed rails. If bed rails are used, the facility ensures correct installation, use, and maintenance of the rails; -Definitions; -Bed Rails are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed. They are available in a variety of types, shapes and sizes ranging from full to one-half, or one-eighth lengths.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications kept in facility medication rooms and on medication carts were within the date of expiration and failed to ensure wound dressings were disposed of when expired. The facility census was 145. Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy, revised in April 2007 and in use at the time of survey, showed: -The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed; -Facility nursing staff are responsible for maintaining medications stored in facility medication rooms and on facility medication carts. 2. Observation of the 200 hall medication room on 9/12/23 at 10:25 A.M., showed: -A single-dose injection pen of Trulicity (a medication used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar (glucose)) 0.75 milligram (mg) with no name or label stored in the medication room refrigerator; -Four boxes of Levothyroxine (a medicine used to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have corresponding recipes for meals served, to ensure residents were served meals in accordance with physician orders and provide an alternate menu (Residents #36, #92 and #58). The sample was 29. The census was 145. 1. Review of the lunch menu for 9/14/23, showed the following: -Resident choice meal with 3 ounces of protein; -Residents voted to have fried rice and shrimp for a meal. Observation of the lunch meal prep on 9/14/23, showed the following: -At 10:11 A.M., the Dietary Manager scooped various amounts of rice, scrambled eggs and meat with no precise measurements. After the food was fried, she placed the fried rice mixture into a pot for the steam table. -No recipe was followed. During an interview on 9/14/23 at 9:06 A.M., the Dietary Manager said she was not following a recipe due to the fried rice being easy to make. Each resident would receive the correct amount of protein due to how much meat was in the fried rice. 2. Review of Resident #36's electronic physician order sheet (ePOS), showed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared under sanitary conditions by failing to wear beard nets and failing to ensure proper hand washing/glove techniques were followed. The Sample was 29. The Census was 145. 1. Review of the facility's Preventing Foodborne Illness: Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices policy, dated October 2008, showed the following: -Policy: Food Services employees shall follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness; -Procedure: All employees who handle, prepare or serve food will be trained in the practices of safe food handling and preventing foodborne illness. Employees will demonstrate knowledge and competency in these practices prior to working with food or serving food to residents; -Employees must wash their hands: After personal body functions (i.e., toileting, blowing/wiping nose, coughing, sneezing, etc.); after using tobacco, eating or drinking; whenever entering or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate, and individualized care plans to address the specific needs of four residents (Residents #68, #102, #36 and #27). The sample was 29. The census was 145. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plan policy, revised October 2022, showed: -Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment; -Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines included: -The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs, and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care. Services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately provide assistance to promote good nutrition and maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status to provide one resident (Resident #28), with significant weight loss, nutritional needs as ordered. The sample size was 29. The census was 145. Review of the facility's Resident Nutrition Services policy, dated July 2017, showed: -Policy Statement: Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: The multidisciplinary staff, including nursing staff, the Attending Physician and Dietitian will assess each resident's nutritional needs, food likes, dislikes and eating habits: -They will develop a resident care plan based on this assessment; -Provide prompt meal service and appropriate feeding assistance; -Nursing personnel or feeding assistants will provide assistance with eating and ensure that assistive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice when staff documented nutritional health shakes as administered for one resident (Resident #28), eye drops as administered for one resident (Resident #47) and Juven (nutritional powder used for wound healing) as administered for one resident (Resident #12), when the health shakes, eye drops, and Juven were not provided. The census was 145. Review of the facility's Charting and Documentation policy, revised July 2017, showed: -Policy statement: All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care; -Policy interpretation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dignity to residents by failing to provide meals to all residents at a table at the same time, and treat residents in a respectful manner during meal service. Furthermore, the facility failed to respect residents' privacy when a staff member walked into residents' rooms while talking on a cell phone. The sample was 35 and the census was 185. 1. Observation on 12/18/19 in the main dining room during the dinner meal, showed the following: -At 4:45 P.M., three residents sat at a table, two of the residents had their food and were almost done eating. One of the residents sat at the same table with no food in front of him/her. At 5:04 P.M., the third resident received his/her tray; -At 4:50 P.M. two residents sat at a table. One of the residents ate and the other one did not have a tray. At 5:15 P.M., the other resident received his/her tray. Observation on 12/19/19 in the main dining room during the breakfast meal, showed the following: -At 7:40 A.M. at table #23, one resident had a food tray in front of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was maintained in a clean, orderly and comfortable manner regarding floors, walls, resident equipment including tube feeding stands, cubicle curtains, call lights and water dispensers. This affected nine sampled resident rooms, the dining rooms, water dispensers for residents and the shower/bathrooms. The sample was 35 and the census was 185. 1. Observation of Resident #121's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/5/19, showed the resident was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the resident's current physician's orders, showed the resident received tube feedings every four hours. Observation of the resident's tube feeding pump from 12/18-12/23/19, during the survey, showed the pump had copious amounts of brownish dried splatters and spills along the base of the pump. 2. Observation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for dialysis (process for removal of waste and excess water from the blood due to kidney failure) treatment and care, obtain daily weights, administer medication on dialysis days as ordered, clarify physician's order for an indwelling urinary catheter, apply elastic support stockings, follow physician's orders for correct administration of oxygen and obtain physician's order for oxygen therapy, for five sampled residents (Residents #322, #112, #49, #34 and #61). The sample was 35. The census was 185. 1. Review of Resident #322's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/8/19, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Received dialysis; -Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (A-fib, irregular heartbeat), blood clots, heart failure, high blood pressure, end stage renal disease (ESRD-kidney failure) and high cholesterol. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by not effectively communicating a hospice resident's (Resident #83) significant weight loss to his/her guardian and document interventions in place prior to a resident (Resident #96) being sent out to the hospital with a change in condition. The sample was 35. The census was 185. 1. Review of Resident #83's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/22/19, showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE] on hospice care; -Moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making; -Total dependence on staff for personal hygiene, eating and toileting; -Upper and lower extremity impairment; -Two-Stage II (Partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed without slough. May also present as an intact or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative therapy services for residents who had physician orders to provide these services. This affected five of eight sampled residents who had order for restorative services (Resident's #49, #121, #166, #96 and #34). The sample was 35. The census was 185. 1. Review of Resident #49's physician progress notes, showed the following: -Current diagnoses including dementia, coronary obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease), high blood pressure, psychosis, difficulty in walking, generalized muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and cataracts; -On 7/24/19 at 7:44 A.M., resident fell coming out of room. Complained of falling in small space between the bed and dresser. He/she hit his/her knee on the floor and sustained a skin tear; -On 9/29/19 at 7:32 P.M., the nurse was informed that the resident fell. Nurse came into assess resident and and noticed he/she lay…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident #34) from injury during a transfer, failed to follow their policy and the manufacturer's recommendations during two of two resident (Resident's #155 and #101) transfers with a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift used to transfer a resident from one surface to another), failed to follow their policy after a resident's fall (Resident #49) and failed to prevent access to razors and chemicals in three of four central bathrooms, leaving them available to all residents who were able to move freely around the facility. The sample size was 35. The census was 185. 1. Review of Resident #34's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/2/19, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Limited assistance required for transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene; -Impairment to upper extremity on one side and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-23 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aides (CNAs) received the required 12 hours of training and have a system to track the hours for four of four sampled CNAs reviewed who worked at the facility for over a year. The census was 185. 1. Review of CNA K's training record, showed the following: -Date of hire (DOH), 4/3/18; -Total hours of training completed for the last full year of employment, 8 hours. 2. Review of CNA S's training record, showed the following: -DOH, 7/19/11; -Total hours of training completed for the last full year of employment, 8.75 hours. 3. Review of CNA V's training record, showed the following: -DOH, 10/12/14; -Total hours of training completed for the last full year of employment, 6.25 hours. 4. Review of CNA W's training record, showed the following: -DOH, 3/2/18; -Total hours of training completed for the last full year of employment, 4.75 hours. 5. During an interview on 12/19/19 at approximately 10:00 A.M., assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) N said they did not currently have a process in place to track CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail, to ensure an accurate reconciliation of controlled substances. The facility failed to properly document narcotic counts for the controlled substances for seven of nine medication carts. The census was 185. 1. Review of the Certified Medication Technician (CMT) narcotic count sheet, dated 12/1/19 through 12/18/19, on the 200 East Hall, showed the following: -No signature by the off-going CMT, a total of 26 shifts; -No signature by the on-coming CMT, a total of 28 shifts; -Total narcotic drug cards not documented as counted, a total of 15 shifts. 2. Review of the nurses narcotic count sheet, dated 12/1/19 through 12/18/19, on the 100 [NAME] Hall, showed the following: -No signature by the off-going nurse, a total of 16 shifts; -No signature by the on-coming nurse, a total of 17 shifts; -Total narcotic drug cards not documented as counted, a total of 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled, dated and sealed appropriately; failed to maintain clean vents in the Manor dining rooms; failed to ensure the kitchen floors were maintained free of debris and dirt build up and failed to ensure dietary staff used safe food handling techniques during meal service. In addition, staff dried clean dishware on a rusty drying rack. The census was 185. 1. Observations of the main kitchen on 12/15/19 at 6:33 A.M., showed the following: -Signs on the exterior of the reach in refrigerators, showed Label and date everything before it goes in refrigerator; -In the reach in refrigerator near the coffee station, a tray with at least 40, two ounce (oz) clear plastic containers of salad dressing with no dates; -In the reach in freezer near the ice machine, an unopened, undated box of five pound bags of thawed liquid eggs. Directions on the box, showed to keep frozen; -A wired drying rack near the three vat sink with rusted surfaces and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to follow acceptable infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection during perineal (area between the thighs, extending from the pubic bone to the tail bone) care by not handwashing and touching a resident with soiled gloves (Residents #105, #110 and #54), allowing a catheter bag to rest on the floor with urine unable to drain from looped tubing (Resident #88), not cleansing the glucometer (device used to check blood sugar) with an approved disinfectant before and after use (Resident #272), placing the glucometer on an unclean surface and transporting it under his/her axilla (arm pit) (Resident #34) and allowing a nasal cannula (a device for delivering oxygen by way of two small tubes that are inserted into the nares) to rest on a bed and seat of a recliner (Resident #61). The sample was 35. The census was 185. 1. Review of Resident 105's electronic medical record, showed the following: -admission date of 7/18/19; -Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-23 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a final account of resident trust fund balances within 30 days to the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate for one expired resident (Resident #22) and for two discharged residents (Residents #25 and #38). The facility census was 185. 1. Record review of the facility maintained Discharge Report dated [DATE], showed Resident #22 expired on [DATE]. Record review of the facility maintained Resident Fund Petty Cash Box, for the period [DATE] through [DATE], showed an envelope with Resident #22's name written on it. Facility staff failed to refund Resident #22's funds held in the Resident Fund Petty Cash Box in the amount of $13.00 as of [DATE] (100 days after Resident #22 expired.) During an interview on [DATE] at 9:45 A.M., the Business Office Assistant said he/she did not know why the money had not been refunded back to Resident #22. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:21 A.M., the Accounts Receivable Specialist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) immediately after a resident alleged his/her leg was fractured during an improper transfer (Resident #34) and after the discovery of an injury of unknown origin to a non-verbal resident (Resident #83). The sample size was 35. The census was 185. 1. Review of Resident #34's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Limited assistance required for transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene; -Impairment to upper extremity on one side and no impairment to lower extremities; -Occasional pain at a level of four on a zero to 10 scale; -Received non scheduled pain medication; -No falls; -Diagnoses included heart failure, kidney failure, chronic lung disease and anxiety. Review of the care plan, dated 6/7/19 and last revised on 12/18/19, showed the following: -Problem: Resident is at risk for falls due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to conduct a complete and thorough investigation of a fracture to one resident's leg (Resident #34) and an injury of unknown cause to a nonverbal resident (Resident #83) and failed to submit their investigation in the required time frame to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS). The sample size was 35. The census was 185. 1. Review of Resident #34's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/2/19, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Limited assistance required for transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene; -Impairment to upper extremity on one side and no impairment to lower extremities; -Occasional pain at a level of four on a zero to 10 scale; -Received non scheduled pain medication; -No falls; -Diagnoses included heart failure, kidney failure, chronic lung disease and anxiety. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and family, did not attempt new interventions and did not monitor consumption for one resident with a significant weight loss of 10.52% over three months (Resident #155). Furthermore, the facility failed to adequately monitor and implement additional meal supplements for one resident with significant weight loss of 9.63% in three months and a significant weight loss of 15.23% in six months (Resident #96). The sample was 35 and the census was 185. 1. Review of Resident #155's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/27/19, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Dependent on staff for transfers and personal hygiene; -Extensive assistance required for bed mobility, dressing and toileting; -Weight loss of 5% in last month or 10% or more in the last six months and not on a physician prescribed weight loss program; -Diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-12-23 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the most recent survey results in a place readily accessible to residents, family members and the public. The facility also failed to post notices in a prominent location of the availability of the reports in the Manors (four separate buildings). Furthermore, the facility failed to maintain reports from complaint investigations made during the three preceding years for review upon request. The census was 185. Observations on all days of the survey on 12/15/19, 12/17/19 through 12/20/19 and 12/23/19, showed the following: -A sign in the front lobby of the main building showed the survey results were available at the front desk; -No postings regarding the availability of the most recent survey results or the prior three years in Magnolia, Aspen, Cypress or [NAME] Manors. The Manors were separate buildings with separate entrances, not connected to the main building During an interview on 12/23/19 at 8:00 A.M., the front desk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2019-12-23 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a written notice for transfer/discharge to the resident and/or resident's representative, when the resident was transferred to the hospital for various medical reasons for eight residents (Residents #61, #5, #82, #59, #91, #166, #75 and #96). The sample was 35. The census was 185. 1. Review of Resident #61's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, admission and discharge assessments, showed the following: -Original admission date to the facility 7/27/18; -discharged to the hospital 9/24/19; -readmission to the facility 9/29/19; -discharged to the hospital 10/10/19; -readmission to the facility 10/19/19; -No documentation a written transfer/discharge notice was provided to the resident and/or their representative at the time of the transfers to the hospital. Review of the resident's progress notes, dated 9/24/19 through 10/19/19, showed the resident was transferred to the hospital for medical reasons. There was no documentation the resident and/or their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to STONEBRIDGE SENIOR LIVING — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIERMAN, MARK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 11/12/1996 |
| MILLER, BETH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/17/2023 |
| BRIDGE REHABILITATION INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| BUSEY CORPORATION | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/10/2023 |
| ELDERCARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/29/1999 |
| CLARK, BENITA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/15/2022 |
| DOERHOFF, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| RAZZAQUE, NAVEED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2003 |
| THAYER, JEANNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/25/2016 |
| LIERMAN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/10/1992 |
| WIPFLI LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| BUTZ, GREG | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/15/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265486. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.