Stonebridge Adams Street
1024 Adams Street, Jefferson City, MO 65101 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (573) 635-1320 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $38,656 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-04)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.2% | 18.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.7% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 21.8% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.9% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.0% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.9% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.6% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 4.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.3% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.0% | 23.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 25.0% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.2% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.5% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 20.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 20.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 20.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 75.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 48.5 residents a day — about 40% occupied, or roughly 72 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 30% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide a proper transfer for one resident (Resident #1) in a manner to prevent accidents, when staff did not utilize two staff as directed and the resident sustained an injury to his/her leg. The facility census was 56. 1. Review of the facility's Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents Policy, revised July 2017, showed: -In order to protect the safety and the well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to life and move residents; -Nursing staff, in conjunction with the rehabilitation staff, shall assess individual residents' needs for transfer assistance on an ongoing basis. Staff will document resident transferring and lifting needs in the care plan. 2. Review of Resident #1's Annual minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 12/13/223, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Dependent with transfers; -Impairment to bilateral lower extremities; -Utilized wheelchair for mobility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide safe mechanical transfer for one resident (Resident #1) and staff failed to transfer one resident (Resident #3) in a safe manner. Census was 47.1. Review of the facility's policy, Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, dated 07/2017, showed in order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents.Review of the facility's policy, Hoyer Safety, undated, showed staff are directed to lock the wheels and widen the base to transfer. The policy did not provide direction for staff when to close the base of the lift.The facility did not provide a policy regarding safe transfers using a gait belt. 2. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], a federally mandated assessment tool, showed staff assessed the resident as cognitively intact and was dependent on staff with transferring to and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to use appropriate hand hygiene infection control practices during perineal care for one residents (Resident #1) out of two sampled residents, staff failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions ((EBP) the wearing of gown and gloves during high contact patient care activities to prevent the spread of multi-resistant organisms), failed to use appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infectious causing contaminants when facility staff failed change and/or store oxygen in a manner to prevent the spread of bacteria. The facility census was 47.1. Review of the facility's policy, Oxygen Concentrator, dated 01/2018, showed nursing staff were responsible to change oxygen tubing and mas/cannula weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated.Review of the facility's policy, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 04/04/24, showed:-it is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, facility staff failed to provide adequate nursing staff, as determined by their facility assessment. The facility census was 55. 1. Review of the facility's staffing policy, dated 10/2017, showed the facility provides sufficient number of staff with the skills and competency necessary to provide care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. Staffing numbers and the skill requirements of direct care staff are determined by the needs of the residents based on each resident's plan of care.2. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 10/30/25, showed the assessment includes an evaluation of the resident population and available facility resources and services to ensure person centered care needs are completely met. Review showed the average daily census for the last six months of occupied beds as 54.6. Review showed direct care staff required to care for their facility census for a twenty-four-hour period should include: -Six Certified Nurse Aides/Nurse Aides (CNA's/NA's) on day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) who received tube feeds (supplemental liquid nutrition) through a gastrostomy (G-tube) (a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) received his/her supplemental liquid nutrition as ordered by the physician. The census was 55.1. Review of the facility's Enteral Nutrition policy, undated, showed adequate nutritional support through enteral feeding will be provided to residents as ordered. The policy showed recommendation to initiate the use of a feeding will be based on the results of the comprehensive nutritional assessment, and will be consistent with current standards of practice, the resident's advance directives, treatment goals and facility policies. The policy did not contain direction for staff in regard to documentation of scheduled tube feedings in the resident's medical record.2. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure oxygen tubing and/or nebulizer mask and tubing were changed at least weekly for four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) out of four sampled residents and failed to provide orders for oxygen therapy for one resident (Resident #4). The facility's census was 58. 1. Review of the facility's Oxygen Concentrator policy, revised 01/2018, showed: -Oxygen is administered under orders of the attending physician, except in the case of an emergency;-Keep delivery devices covered in plastic bag when not in use;-Change oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated;-Change humidifier bottle when empty, every 72 hours, or as recommended by the manufacturer;-If applicable, change nebulizer tubing and delivery devices every 72 hours. 2. Review of the facility's policy on Cleaning and Disinfecting Nebulizer equipment, dated 2017, showed staff were directed to replace nebulizer mask and tubing weekly.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure prepared food items were served at a safe and appetizing temperature when facility staff failed to serve meals in a timely manner to residents and failed to maintain the internal temperatures of hot food to at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit ( F) upon service to residents who resided on the 300 and 400 halls. The facility census was 58.1.Review of the facility's Food Preparation and Service policy, dated July 2014, showed the danger zone for food temperatures is between 41 F and 135 F. This temperature range promotes the rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that cause foodborne illness. The longer foods remain in the danger zone the greater the risk for growth of harmful pathogens. 2. Review of the facility's Food Safety Requirements policy, dated 09/2022, showed foods and beverages shall be distributed and served to resident in a manner to prevent contamination and maintain food at the proper temperature and out of the danger zone. This includes timely distribution of all meals and snacks. 3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to check the Employee Disqualification List ((EDL) a list of individuals who have been determined to have abused or neglected a resident or misappropriated funds or property belonging to a resident) and/or criminal background check (CBC), prior to hire in accordance with their facility policy for eight employee (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J, receptionist K, Social Services Director, Certified Medication Technician (CMT) L, housekeeper N, Nurse Aide (NA) B, and Food Service Manager) out of ten sampled employees. Facility staff failed to develop an abuse and neglect policy that directed staff to check the NA registry for all employees, prior to hire, for seven employees (CNA I, LPN J, Receptionist K, Social services director, CMT L, housekeeper N, and NA B) out of 10 employees. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the Facility's Background Screening Investigations, dated March 2019, showed the director of personnel,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to accurately assess the use of side rails for three residents (Resident #2, #49, and #52), and failed to complete an entrapment risk assessment for five residents (Resident #1, #2, #49, #52, and #106), out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy for Entrapment Risk Assessments. Review of the facility's Proper use of Side Rails Policy, dated 09/2022, showed: -Examples of bedrails include, but are not limited to side rails, bed side rails, safety rails, grab bars, and assist bars; -The resident assessment must assess the resident's risk from using bed rails such as entrapment; -The resident assessment should assess the resident's risk of entrapment between the mattress and bed rail or in the bed rail itself; -A nurse assigned to the resident will complete reassessments in accordance with the facility's assessment schedule, but not less than quarterly,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week. The facility's census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Nursing Services Registered Nurse Policy, dated October 2022, showed it is the intent of the facility to comply with RN staffing requirements, and the facility will utilize the services of a Registered Nurse for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week. 2. Review of the facility's time-keeping records for consecutive hours worked by an RN for August 2024, showed: -Saturday, 08/17/24: 7.55 hours; -Sunday, 08/18/24: 7.9 hours. Review of the facility's time-keeping records for consecutive hours worked by an RN for September 2024, showed: -Sunday, 09/01/24: 7.83 hours; -Saturday, 09/07/24: 7.6 hours; -Sunday, 09/08/24: seven hours; -Sunday, 09/29/24: did not show a RN in the building. Review of the facility's time-keeping records for consecutive hours worked by an RN for October 2024, showed: -Saturday, 10/05/24: 4.87 hours;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet to meet their daily nutritional and special dietary needs, when staff failed to follow recipes. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Standardized Recipes policy, revised April 2007, showed staff were directed to use only tested, standardized recipes to prepare foods. Review showed standardized recipes will be adjusted to the number of portions required for a meal. Review of the facility's standardized recipe for 52 servings of shepherd's pie showed staff were directed to include 16 pounds of ground beef, one and one-eighth of a #10 (approximately seven pounds) can of tomatoes and one gallon plus one cup of potatoes. Review showed the recipe also included peas and carrots. Review showed a three inch by three inch wide long portion was equal to one serving. Observation on 12/02/24 at 11:36 A.M., showed dietary staff served the residents a #8 scoop (four ounces) of shepherd's pie for the noon meal. Observation showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to store food in a manner to prevent potential contamination and outdated use. Facility staff failed to store ice scoops in a manner to prevent contamination and failed cover resident meals in a manner to prevent contamination. Facility staff failed to maintain the ice machine drain air gap. The census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Food Receiving and Sorage policy, revised July 2014, showed: -Food in desiganted dry storage areas shall be kept off the floor at least 18 inches; -All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated with a use by date; -Other opened containers must be dated and sealed or covered during storage; -Dry foods that are stored in bins will be removed from original packaging, labeled and dated. 2. Observation on 12/01/24 at 9:29 A.M., showed the kitchen refrigerator #1 door contained a sign which read Record open and use by dates on all open items. Follow use by manufacturer's date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement complete policies and procedures for the inspection, testing and maintenance of the facility's water systems to inhibit the growth of waterborne pathogens and reduce the risk of an outbreak of Legionnaire's Disease (a serious type of pneumonia (lung infection) caused by Legionella bacteria, which places all residents of the facility at risk of exposure which could lead to illness. Facility staff failed to ensure the two-step purified protein derivative (PPD) (skin test for Tuberculosis (TB)) was completed for six employees (Certified Nurse aide (CNA) I, Licensed practical nurse (LPN) J, Receptionist K, transporter M, Housekeeper N, and nurse aide (NA) B) out of ten sampled employees. Staff failed to perform hand hygiene and/or wash hands to prevent the spread of infection during perineal care for four residents (Resident #9, #14, #38, and #52) of four sampled residents. Failed to implement the Enhanced Barrier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet resident's needs for three residents (Resident #20, #49, and #56) out of 14 sampled residents.The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plans policy, September 2022, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment; -The comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff used to assess the care needs of the resident, assessment. 2. Review of Resident #20's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to safely transfer two residents (Resident #14 and #52) of two sampled residents via mechanical lift, in a manner to prevent accidents. The facility's census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Using a Mechanical Lift Machine, dated July 2017, showed staff were directed as follows: -At least two nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift; -Staff must be trained and demonstrate competency using the specific machines or devices used in the facility; -Gently support the resident as he or she is moved, but do not support any weight; -The policy did not contain direction for position of the base legs during the transfer. 2. Review of Resident #14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 10/14/24 showed staff assessed the resident as severe cognitive impairment and dependent on staff for transfers from chair to bed/bed to chair. Review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% out of 27 opportunities observed, seven errors occurred, resulting in a 25.93% error rate, which affected two residents (Resident #16, and #36). The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the Facility's Administering Medications policy, dated 12/2012, showed: -Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders including any required time frame; -Individual administering the medication must check to verify right time; -The Expiration/beyond use date on the medication label must be checked prior to administering, when opening a multi-dose container, the date opened shall be recorded on the container; Review of the Facility's Medication Errors policy, dated 04/2017, showed: -A medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological which is not in accordance with physician's orders, manufacturer specifications, or accepted professional standards and principles or the professional providing services; -Example of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to store medications in a safe and effective manner when staff failed to properly label, and/or discard expired insulin medications from two of two sampled medication carts. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, dated 12/2012, showed the expiration/beyond use date on the medication label must be checked prior to administering. When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened shall be recorded on the container. 2. Observation on [DATE] at 9:26 A.M., showed the 100/200 hall medication cart contained two Lantus insulin Pens opened and undated. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:30 A.M., Certified Medication Technician (CMT) P said insulin pens are usually only good for 28 days. He/She said the person opening the insulin pen is responsible for putting the open date on the pen. He/She said the risk of not having an open date is you don't know when it expires, and insulin may not be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to contact one resident's (Resident #3) responsible party and physician when the resident had an unwitnessed fall. The facility census 54. 1. Review of the facility's Change in a Resident's Condition or Status Policy, dated 5/2017, showed staff are directed to promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and or status. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been an accident or incident involving the resident. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident a nurse will notify the resident's representative when the resident is involved in any accident or incident that results in an injury including injuries of an unknown source. 2. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Diagnosis of right sided paralysis and vascular dementia; -Dependant on two staff for transfers; -Two falls since prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete neurological checks for three residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) out of three sampled residents who had unwitnessed falls. The facility census was 54. 1. Review of the facility's Fall Clinical Protocol Policy, dated 09/2012, showed falls should be categorized as those that occur while trying to rise from a sitting or lying to an upright position, those that occur while upright and attempting to ambulate, and other circumstances such a sliding out of a chair or rolling from a low bed to the floor. Review of the facility's Post Fall Step by Step Policy, undated, showed staff are to complete post fall initial clinical assessment completed one time directly after each fall. Post fall 72- hour monitoring is completed after a no head injury fall once per shift for three days Post fall 72-hour monitoring with head injury is completed on a tapering scale for 72 hours. 2. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete neurological checks and fall follow up documentation for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of three sampled residents who had un-witnessed falls. The facility census was 55. 1. Review of the facility's Post Fall step by step Protocol, undated, showed first post fall initial clinical assessment is completed one time directly after each fall. Review showed post fall 72 hour monitoring, with a head injury complete assessment is completed according to neurological timelines. 2. Review of Resident # 1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 6/20/24, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitive impairment; -Dependent for mobility; -Resident at risk for falls with two falls since admission or prior assessment. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 5/15/24, showed staff assessed the resident at risk for falls related to dementia, poor safety awareness, and contractures to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to store food in a manner to prevent contamination and out-dated use. The facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene as often as necessary using approved techniques to prevent cross-contamination. The facility staff failed to allow sanitized dishes to air dry prior to stacking in storage and use to prevent the growth of food-borne pathogens. The facility staff also failed to wear hair restraints to protect food and food contact surfaces from potential contamination. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the Food Safety Requirements policy, dated September 2022, showed the policy directed staff to label and date opened food items and to store foods covered or in air tight containers. Review also showed the policy directed staff to monitor foods so that it is used, frozen (where applicable), or discarded by its use-by date. Observation on 11/14/23 at 10:38 A.M., showed the cook's station contained: -Opened and undated one gallon bottles of red wine vinegar, white distilled vinegar, imitation vanilla…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to update the resident's care plan for one resident (Residents #7) who used oxygen, and for one resident (Resident #19) whose advanced directive changed from a full code to a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Care Planning - Interdisciplinary (IDT) team policy dated September 2013, showed: -The facility's care planning/IDT members are responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident; -The resident's care plan is based on the comprehensive assessment. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care plan policy dated September 2022, showed: -The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; b. Any services that would otherwise be furnished, but are not provided due to the residents right to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of documentation when staff failed to obtain a physician order for the use of assistive devices for four residents (Resident #7, #12, #30, and #37), failed to complete bed rail assessments to show the use of the assistive devices for three residents (Resident #30, #37, and #51) as directed in the facility policy, failed document one resident's skin weekly as ordered (Resident #53), and failed to consult with the physician on a dietary recommendation for a supplement on one resident (Resident #53). The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Proper Use of Side Rails Policy, dated September 2022, showed: -Facility will provide necessary treatment and care to the resident who has bed rails (assist bars) in accordance with professional standards of practice and the residents choice. That should be evidenced in the resident's records, including their care plan, including but not limited to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to to clean and store respiratory equipment and devices in a manner to prevent the spread of infection for nine residents (Residents #7, #10, #14, #17, #26, #34, #36, #46, and #51). The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy for oxygen use, cleaning, and/or storage. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Manual General Policies Cleaning and Disinfecting Nebulizer Equipment, dated 2017, showed staff were directed to do the following: -Apply gloves; -Disassemble the nebulizer by removing the cup and mask or mouthpiece; -Thoroughly clean all visible soil or organic material from the cup, mask, or mouthpiece before disinfection; -Use warm water and mild dish detergent to was the nebulizer parts or follow manufacturers recommendations; -Shake an excess water off the cup and air dry on a clean surface, do not place directly on a contaminated surface; -Replace…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to store and label medications and biologicals in a safe effective manner for one of two medication carts, one treatment cart, one of two medication storage rooms, one crash cart, and two resident's (Resident #12 and #37) rooms. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, revised April 2007, showed staff were directed to do the following: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; -The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; -The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals, all such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed; -Compartments (including but not limited to drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure residents were treated in a manner to maintain their dignity when staff failed to announce themselves and wait for permission before entering the room for one resident (Resident #34), hung visible care signs for one resident (Resident #21) fluid consistency, and failed to provide privacy by ensuring the door was closed during a medication injection and blood glucose test for one residents (Resident #20). The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Nursing Home Residents' Rights pamphlet and Resident and Family Handbook, undated, showed the residents have a right to a dignified existence and be treated with consideration, respect, and dignity, recognizing each residents individuality and to privacy during treatment and care of personal needs. Review of the facility's Dignity policy, dated September 2022, showed: -All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) remained free from physical abuse when a staff member did not release the resident's wrists during a transfer, and then forcefully pushed the resident in the stomach with closed fists, resulting in a bruise to the resident's arm. The facility census was 54. The administrator was notified on 8/09/23 of Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 7/27/23. On 7/27/23, the administrator identified Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A physically abused the resident. Upon discovery, staff suspended the employee, conducted an investigation, notified the appropriate parties and agencies, and terminated the CNA. Facility staff reviewed their abuse and neglect policies, and inserviced all employees on abuse and neglect. Staff corrected the deficient practice on 7/27/23. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation Compliance and Overview Policy, dated 9/2022, showed the purpose is to assure the facility is doing all within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, or exploitation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-06-03 · tag F0570 — widespreadAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to maintain a surety bond sufficient to ensure protection of resident funds for 18 of 18 sampled residents. The facility held funds for a total of 18 residents. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Resident Trust Fund Account Policy and Procedure, dated 11/28/16, showed the facility has a current surety bond in the amount equal to at least one and one-half times the average total of the monthly balances and will be reviewed annually. Review of the facility's resident fund account bank statements from May 2021 through April 2022, showed an average monthly balance of $29,324, which would require a bond of $43,986. Review of the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) approved bond list, dated 4/17/18, showed the facility had a bond for $30,000. During an interview on 6/1/22 at 10:05 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said he/she is new to the position and is still learning. He/she said he/she was unaware the bond needed to be an average of one and a half times the amount for the preceding 12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet the residents medical, and nursing needs when they failed to address the code status for two residents (Resident #30 and #203), failed to address falls for one resident (Resident #21) and failed to address oxygen use for one resident (Resident #38). The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, dated [DATE], showed: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: -Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to revise the care plan for two residents (Resident #26 and Resident #29) who had a change in code status, and one resident (Resident #35) who received an anticoagulant (medication used to thin the blood to reduce the risk of blood clots). Additionally, staff failed to follow the care plan for two residents (Resident #26 and Resident #43) one of which was at risk for falls and required the use of fall mats. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Comprehensive care plan policy, dated [DATE], showed: -Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition changes; -The interdisciplinary team must review and update the care plan when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition and at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. 2. Review of the facility's Advanced Directives policy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice when they failed to document assessments, and contact the physician for two residents (Residents #27 and #210) who sustained falls at the facility, failed to obtain a physician's order for one residents (Resident #21) code status (the type of emergent treatment a person would or would not receive if their heart or breathing were to stop) and one residents (Resident #38) oxygen. Additionally, staff failed to clean and maintain oxygen concentrator filters for one resident (Resident #44) who was dependant on oxygen. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Clinical Protocol for Falls, dated [DATE], directed staff: -Staff will evaluate and document falls that occur while the individual is in the facility; for example when and where they happen, any observations of the events, etc.; -The staff, with the physician's guidance, will follow up on any fall with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order for an indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) and an indication for the use of the catheter for one resident (Resident #21). Additionally, staff failed to obtain orders for catheter care, and catheter/balloon size for two residents (Resident #21 and #203), one of which had a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Physician Services policy, dated April 2013, showed it did not contain direction for staff in regards to catheter orders or care of catheters. Review of the facility's Catheter Care, Urinary policy, dated September 2014, showed the purpose of the procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and directed staff to document: -The date and time catheter care was provided; -The name and title of the individual providing the catheter care; -All assessment data obtained while providing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-03 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete ongoing assessments to assure bed rails were used to meet the resident's needs, for three residents (Resident #7, #10, and #50). The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Proper Use of Side Rails Policy, dated October 2017, showed: -The facility will provide ongoing monitoring and supervision of side rail/bed rail use for effectiveness, assessment of need and determination when the side rail/bed rail will be discontinued; -The use of side rails/bed rails as an assistive device will be addressed in the residents' care plan and Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff. 2. Review of Resident 7's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses of Heart failure and chronic Atrial Fibrillation (irregular and fast heart rate); -Required extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility; -Did not use bed rails.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility staff failed to store food in a manner to prevent cross-contamination and out-dated use. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Food Receiving and Storage policy, dated 2001, showed: -Foods shall be received and sstored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices; -Dry foods that are stored in bins will be removed from original packaging, labeled and dated (use by date). Such foods will be rotated using a first in-first out system; -All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date); -Uncooked and raw animal products and fish will be stored separately in drip-prood containers and below fruits, vegetables and other ready-to-eat foods. Observation on 05/31/22 at 9:18 A.M., showed six clear containers on a three-tier cart with dry cereal, not labeled or dated. Obervation on 05/31/22 at 9:24 A.M., showed the dry storage area contained a clear bag of dry ceral not labeled or dated. Further observation showed a clear container with a teal lid, not dated or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #11) had an appropriate indication and diagnoses for the use of an anitpsychotic medication (medication that alters brain activity) and failed to contact the physician with pharmacy recommendations for Gradual Dose Reductions (GDRs) (a stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued) for psychoactive medications for two residents (#32 and #38). The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) policy, dated 10/17, showed: -A review of psychotropic drug use will occur with every MRR. A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior. These drugs include but are not limited to, drugs in the following categories, anti-psychotic, anti-depressant, anti-anxiety and anti-hypnotic; -The pharmacist should report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-12-04 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to notify the Ombudsman (a resident advocate) for four residents (Resident #25, #34, #38, and #54) out of four sampled resident who transfered to the hospital. The facility's census was 53. 1. Review of the facility policies showed the facility did not have a policy for Ombudsman notification. 2. Review of Resident #25's medical record showed the resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The medical record did not contain documentation staff notified the Ombudsman of the resident's transfer to the hospital. 3. Review of Resident #34's medical record showed the resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The medical record did not contain documentation staff notified the Ombudsman of the resident's transfer to the hospital. 4. Review of Resident #38's medical record showed the resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-12-04 · tag F0625 — widespreadNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for four residents (Resident #25, #34, #38, and #54) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility's census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Bed Holds policy, dated March 2022, showed the facility shall inform residents upon admission and prior to a transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave of the bed-hold policy. 2. Review of Resident #25's medical record showed the resident discharged from the facility on 10/15/24 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The record did not contain written documentation staff notified the resident or the resident's responsible party of the facility's bed-hold policy. 3. Review of Resident #34's medical record showed the resident discharged from the facility on 10/31/24 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The record did not contain written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-12-04 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to post the required nurse staffing information on a daily basis, which included the facility name, current date, resident census, total number of staff and the actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift. Facility staff failed to keep the required daily staffing records for 18 months. The facility's census was 53. 1.Review of the facility's policy titled, Nurse Staffing Posting, dated September 2022, showed: -The facility will post, on a daily basis for each shift, the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents; -It is the policy of the facility to make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to resident and visitors at any given time; -The facility will post the Nurse Staffing sheet at the beginning of each shift; -A copy of the schedule will be available to all supervisors to ensure the information posted is up-to-date and current; -The information shall reflect staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-12-04 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to designate a person to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services with the appropriate qualifications, when the facility did not employ a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional full-time. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility Food Services Manager policy, updated 9/28/22, showed the director of food and nutrition services must at a minimum meet one of the following qualifications: -A certified dietary manger (CDM); -A certified food service manager; -Has two or more years of experience in the position of director of food and nutrition services in a nursing facility setting and has completed a course of study in food safety and management. During an interview on 12/02/24 at 10:26 A.M., the Dietary Supervisor (DS) said he/she did not have any dietary manager training. The DS said he/she had worked in hotels and restaurants prior to starting at the facility. The DS said he/she was aware of the Certified Dietary Manager requirement and the administrator was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-11-17 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to designate one or more individuals with specialized training in Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) as the Infection Preventionist (IP) for the facility's infection prevention and control program. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Infection Preventionist policy, dated September 2022, showed the facility will designate a qualified individual as IP whose primary role is to coordinate and be actively accountable for the facility's infection prevention and control program to include the antibiotic stewardship program. The facility will ensure the IP is qualified by education, training, experience or certification. During the entrance conference on 11/14/23 at 9:43 A.M., the Administrator said they do not currently have a certified IP person. He/She said there are three staff enrolled in the class but have not completed it. He/She did not know when they would complete the course work because there were so many other things that needed taken care of in the facility.
- No harm found · C2022-06-03 · tag F0572 — widespreadGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to inform residents of their rights during their stay in the facility. The facility census was 53. 1. During a group interview on 05/31/22 at 1:15 P.M., residents #2, #7, #8, #15, #20, #30, # 46, #48 and #49 said the following: - They did not know where the resident rights were posted in the facility; - The staff did not review their rights with them. Review of Resident Council Meeting notes, dated 3/2/22, 4/6/22, and 5/4/22, showed it did not contain documentation staff reviewed the resident's rights with the residents. During an interview on 6/3/22 at 3:00 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) F said he/she does not know where the resident's rights are posted. He/She said he/she did not know who was responsible for posting the resident's rights. During an interview on 6/3/22 at 3:04 P.M., the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said resident rights should be posted by the front desk and throughout the facility. They said they were unaware the rights were not posted. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$38,656 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $38,656 — penalty dated 2024-12-04
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to STONEBRIDGE SENIOR LIVING — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIERMAN, MARK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 11/01/2021 |
| MILLER, BETH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/17/2023 |
| BRIDGE REHABILITATION INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| ELDERCARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/22/2025 |
| ENTERPRISE BANK & TRUST | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/30/2008 |
| CIEGEL, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| DOERHOFF, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| KNIGHT, KARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| THAYER, JEANNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| WARBRITTON, DUSTIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2011 |
| WHITE, KERI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/19/2023 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/25/2016 |
| LIERMAN FAMILY CO X, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2011 |
| WIPFLI LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $678K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265810. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.