Gainesville Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 46.9 residents a day — about 47% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.63 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.76 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect all residents from misappropriation of resident property when staff could not account for 19 missing narcotics tablets for 10 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9 and Resident #10). The facility census was 43. Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition Policy, revised 10/22, showed the following information:-Should a specific employee be suspected of or have allegations made of misappropriation, the facility will follow the investigation protocol set forth in this policy;-The facility will educate staff on the policy and procedure for prevention of misappropriation of resident property and of investigation reporting and staff responsibility.Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines, dated 01/01/18, showed the following information:-If a medication with a current, active order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect all resident from misappropriation of property when one facility staff member (Environmental Services Employee A) used one resident's (Resident #1) debit card without consent. The facility census was 46.On 12/26/25, the Social Services Worker became aware of the misappropriation. The facility immediately began their investigation, including multiple interviews of other residents and staff. The facility began education on abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident's property. The facility removed Environmental Services Employee A from the facility. The facility reviewed all other resident's accounts with a debit card, as well as educated the residents on the process for debit card transactions. The facility reported the misappropriation to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) and local law enforcement. The noncompliance was corrected on 12/27/25. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition Policy, revised 10/22, showed, the following:-The facility prohibits…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  1. Please refer to Event ID B3N912, exit date 11/14/24. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegation of possible neglect were reported within two hours to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when the facility Administrator received an allegation of possible neglect involving one resident (Resident #1) in a facility and failed to report it to DHSS. The facility census was 43. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated October 2022, showed the following: -The facility Administrator will be designated as the facility Abuse Coordinator and will be responsible for overseeing the Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program and directing any abuse investigation. -Resident abuse must be reported immediately to the Administrator. The facility Administrator will ensure a thorough investigation of alleged violations of individual rights and document appropriate action. While a facility investigation is under way, steps will be taken to prevent further abuse. Initiate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  1. Please refer to Event ID B3N912, exit date 11/14/24. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible neglect were investigated by the facility and the investigation submitted to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within five days when a staff member received an allegation of possible neglect of one resident (Resident #1) and the facility failed to complaint a full investigation. The facility census was 43. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated October 2022, showed the following: -The facility prohibits mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of residents. This includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychological wellbeing. -The facility Administrator will be designated as the facility Abuse Coordinator and will be responsible for overseeing the Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program and directing any abuse investigation. Investigation. -The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food prepared by the facility was palatable when residents complained the food was served cold at times, the food lacked flavor/seasoning, and the meat was tough at times. 1. Observations and interview on 09/11/24, at 1:07 P.M., showed the following: -The Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed testing the food on the last (test) tray on the cart. Prior to leaving the kitchen the temperature of the cheesy rice casserole was 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F); pork chop was 125 degrees F; and the broccoli was 115 degrees F. -When the tray was presented after the last tray was delivered, the casserole was 110 degrees F, the pork chop was 95 degrees F, and the broccoli was 90 degrees F. -The DM said the food was cool and should have been warmer to be palatable for the residents. Interviews during the Resident Council Meeting on 09/11/24, at 9:15 A.M., showed the residents said the food was cold for the residents who eat in their rooms. The pancakes that morning were cold. The prior night (09/10/24) the menu said burrito with beans/rice,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegation of possible neglect were reported within two hours to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when the facility Administrator received an allegation of possible neglect involving one resident (Resident #1) in a facility and failed to report it to DHSS. The facility census was 43. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated October 2022, showed the following: -The facility Administrator will be designated as the facility Abuse Coordinator and will be responsible for overseeing the Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program and directing any abuse investigation. -Resident abuse must be reported immediately to the Administrator. The facility Administrator will ensure a thorough investigation of alleged violations of individual rights and document appropriate action. While a facility investigation is under way, steps will be taken to prevent further abuse. Initiate investigation including initial notifications of all listed on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible neglect were investigated by the facility and the investigation submitted to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within five days when a staff member received an allegation of possible neglect of one resident (Resident #1) and the facility failed to complaint a full investigation. The facility census was 43. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated October 2022, showed the following: -The facility prohibits mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of residents. This includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychological wellbeing. -The facility Administrator will be designated as the facility Abuse Coordinator and will be responsible for overseeing the Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program and directing any abuse investigation. Investigation. -The facility Administrator will ensure a thorough…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop complete a person centered care plan for each resident when staff failed to care plan related to side rails use for one resident (Resident #13) and wandering/elopement risks for one resident (Resident #36) of 21 sampled residents. Review of the facility's Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team policy, dated January 2017 showed the following: -Upon completion of comprehensive assessments care areas of concern will be triggered to be addressed in the plan of care for that resident. -Each triggered care area will be reviewed by designated staff to determine if a triggered condition affects the resident's function and quality of life. -Staff will document whether or not a care plan is needed to address the triggered area. 1. Review of the facility policy titled Proper Use of Side Rails, reviewed 02/2021, showed the use of side rails will be addressed in the resident's care plan. Review of Resident #13's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment as free from accident hazards as possible for all residents when staff failed to evaluate effective of interventions, care plan new interventions, and failed to complete root cause analysis after multiple elopement attempts and combativeness for one of two residents (Resident #22) reviewed for wandering. Review of the facility's policy titled Elopement Policy, undated, showed it was the intent of the facility to maintain and enhance a resident's dignity by promoting free access in and around the facility, while safeguarding the well-being of the resident, and to monitor behavior or residents to identify potential elopers, such as excessive wandering, especially to doors. 1. Review of Resident #22's admission Record, undated, found under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), showed the following: -admission date of 06/15/23; -Diagnoses included dementia. Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all food was prepared in a form designed to meet the needs of each resident when the facility failed to cut up meat as ordered for one resident (Resident #17). Review of the facility policy titled Menus and Food Preparation-Nutrition Services, revised January 2018, showed the purpose of the policy was to ensure resident nutritional needs are met in conjunction with resident preferences. 1. Review of Resident #17'sadmission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, showed the following: -admission date of 10/18/21; -readmission date of 08/09/22; -Diagnoses included gastroesophageal reflux disease. Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/23/24, showed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the resident's Orders tab in the EMR showed a physician's order, dated 07/18/24, for regular texture, regular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNITY CARE CENTERS — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $315K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO