No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lemay Nursing

9353 South Broadway, Saint Louis, MO 63125 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (314) 631-0540 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (314) 631-0540 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
9615 S Broadway · (314) 544-0986 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1032 Lemay Ferry Rd · (314) 544-4963 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1032 Lemay Ferry Rd · (314) 544-2505 · Call to confirm hours
Park
236 Fannie Ave · (314) 615-4386 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
309 Hoffmeister Ave · (314) 631-0691

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.2%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.3%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.0%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.7%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.9%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.3%25.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.0%17.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.8%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.222.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.232.331.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
0.67
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.86
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
36.8%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 44.2 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.86 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.90 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-15)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's right to be free from physical abuse was not violated (Resident #1) when a resident (Resident #2) punched the resident in the back of the head with a closed fist three times. Resident #2 attempted to strike Resident #1 a fourth time but staff intervened and separated the residents. These two residents had an incident occur approximately one month ago, in which Resident #2 hit Resident #1 in the eye. This incident caused Resident #1 to have a laceration over his/her left eyebrow. The sample was 3. The census was 47. Review of the facility's undated Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition policy, showed: -Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Resident must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the residents, family member or legal guardians,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure on-going resident centered therapeutic activities were provided to residents in the evenings and on weekends as an integral part of their psychosocial well-being. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that 1 on 1 activities were done more than one time a week. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 46. 1. Review of the facility's May 2025 activity calendar, showed: -Monday through Friday, no activities offered after 2:00 P.M.; -Saturdays: 5/3/25, Self Directed Activities, 10:00 A.M., Bingo with volunteer and 3:30, House of Prayer Music Visit. 5/17/25 and 5/31/25 included bingo with volunteer at 10:00 A.M. All other Saturdays were Self Directed Activities, which included coloring, word puzzles, card and board games; -Sundays: Self-Directed activities, which include coloring and word puzzles, card and board games. 2. Review of the 1 on 1 list, provided by the facility, showed 14 residents receiving 1 on 1 activities. 3. During a group…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and ensure side rails were assessed as necessary on a quarterly and annual basis for six of 13 sampled residents(Residents #44, #5, #24, #9, #14 and #28). The census was 46. Review of the facility's Side Rails policy, dated 10/17/23, showed: -Policy: Assess resident side rail restraint needs on admission, annually and with any significant change in order to ensure the resident's highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being. Review quarterly; -Procedure: -Nursing staff will assess need for side rails at time of admission, annually and with any significant change and place in the chart, reviewing quarterly; -Side rails will be evaluated quarterly and reduced/eliminated as possible. 1. Review of Resident #44's Bed Rail/Assist Bar Evaluation, showed one completed on 9/17, but did not specify the year. A half length and quarter length rail was indicated. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and offer nourishing snacks at bedtime. This affected all residents who ate at the facility. The census was 46. Review of the dietary records, showed mealtimes scheduled for the following: -Breakfast meal at 7:30 A.M.; -Lunch meal at 12:15 P.M.; -Dinner meal at 5:30 P.M. During a group interview on 5/13/25 at 11:00 A.M., six residents, whom the facility identified as alert and oriented, attended the group meeting. The residents said the staff just started passing out snacks. They pass the snacks out during the day, but not after dinner. This started within the last week or two. During an interview on 5/14/25 at 12:33 P.M., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B said he/she worked the evening shift and snacks were not passed out in the evening. Activities would pass out snacks after lunch. During an interview on 5/14/25 at 12:34 P.M., CNA C said residents did not receive snacks in the evening. During an interview on 5/14/25 at 12:41 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) D said residents did not receive evening snacks very often.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed ensure the ice machine had an air gap to prevent backflow from the drain pipe into the ice machine, potentially contaminating the contents of the ice machine. The census was 46. Observations on 5/12/25 at 9:53 A.M., 5/13/25 at approximately 8:30 A.M. and 5/14/25 at 8:07 A.M., 10:22 A.M. and 11:32 A.M., showed the ice machine located in the kitchen. The ice machine drain tubing extended down from the ice machine with the lower end of the drain tubing directly in the drain pipe. During an interview on 5/14/25 at 11:50 A.M., the Dietary Manager said he was not aware if there was an air gap from the drain tubing and drain pipe of the ice machine. When shown the tubing and drain, he said he would have to ask the Maintenance Director. During an interview on 5/14/25 at 11:53 A.M., the Maintenance Director said there was no air gap. The facility purchased the new ice machine around December 2024 and he had not yet created the air gap. The ice machine should have an air gap to prevent any backflow from the drainage pipe entering into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards by not implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), for two residents who required EBP for wound treatment or a medically inserted device (urinary catheter, a sterile tube inserted into the bladder through the urinary tract to drain urine) (Residents #14 and #20). In addition, staff failed to cleanse the shared blood sugar machine (Accu-check) with approved cleansing products between each resident use. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure newly hired employees were provided a two-step Mantoux Purified Protein Derivative (PPD, used to test for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their antibiotic stewardship policy by failing to collect data regarding residents' antibiotic treatments and reviewing and documenting that data on the facility approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents receiving antibiotics. The census was 46. Review of the facility's Antibiotic Use Stewardship policy, dated 9/2/18, showed: -Policy Statement: To develop on going best practices to improve antibiotic use; -Policy: Antibiotic prescribing will be monitored & tracked monthly utilizing best practice standards developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other professionals; -Procedure: -Director of Nursing (DON)/designee will track dose, duration & indication of antibiotics prescribed monthly; -Ensure availability of preferred drugs in emergency inventory ; -Have Pharmacy Consultant review antibiotic usage & culture results monthly & make recommendations to DON for timely follow through; -Have Laboratory provide antibiogram…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to designate one or more individuals with specialized training in infection prevention and control as the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) for the facility's infection prevention control program. The census was 46. During the entrance conference on 5/12/25 at 9:14 A.M., the Administrator said the facility did not have an ICP. During an interview on 5/14/25 at 2:51 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) Coordinator was in the process of getting her ICP certification. The DON just started her ICP classes for certification as well. During an interview 5/15/25 at 12:19 P.M., the Administrator said she expected the facility to have a certified ICP.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an inspection of bed frames, mattresses and side rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for six residents (Residents #44, #5, #24, #9, #14 and #28) of 13 sampled residents with side rails. The census was 46. Review of the facility's Side Rails policy, dated 10/17/23, showed: -Policy: Assess resident side rail restraint needs on admission, annually and with any significant change in order to ensure the resident's highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being. Review quarterly; -Procedure: -Side rails will be evaluated quarterly and reduced/eliminated as possible. 1. Review of Resident #44's hand written Bed Rail/Assist Bar Evaluation, showed one completed on 9/17, but did not specify the year. A half length and quarter length rail was indicated. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had a system in place to track the required Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 12 hours annual education (in-services). The facility identified 18 CNAs who worked for the facility for at least one year. Two Certified Medication Technicians (CMTs), (CMT L and CMT K) and eight CNAs (CNA J, CNA I, CNA M, CNA N, CNA O, CNA P, CNA Q, and CNA R), were sampled. The facility failed to document the date and length of time the training was provided for 10 of 10 sampled staff. The census was 46. 1. Review of CMT L's employee file, showed: -Date of hire: 9/8/22; -Evaluation date: 9/8/24, in the date column, 21 topics were checked; -The in-service failed to show the date and length of time the training was provided. 2. Review of CMT K's employee file, showed: -Date of hire: 1/9/24; -Evaluation date: 1/9/25, in the date column, 26 topics were checked; -The in-services failed to show the date and length of time the training was provided. 3. Review of CNA J's employee file, showed: -Date of hire: 5/25/18; -Evaluation date: 5/23/24, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate discharge procedures and complete discharge and/or transfer documentation, for one resident (Resident #48). The sample was 13. The census was 46. Review of the facility's Discharge Summary and Plan policy, reviewed 2/21, showed: -The discharge plan, instructions and summary provides a recapitulation or summary of the resident's stay; -Discharge planning will begin upon admission to the facility; -Admitting nurse will document the resident, family/caregiver stated reason for admission and the resident, family/caregiver plan for discharge; -Case Manager or Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) nurse will make post discharge follow up calls and complete the discharge post discharge, follow up phone call assessment in the resident record. Review of Resident #48's admission Record, showed: -admission date of 4/23/25; -Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung), congestive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess one resident for the use of a belt restraint (Resident #44). The resident had a belt restraint on his/her wheelchair. The facility failed to assess the resident for its use, obtain a physician's order and document the use in the resident's care plan. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately documented medications, treatments, pain assessments, and behavior monitoring for two residents (Residents #19 and #6). The sample size was 13. The census was 46. Review of the facility's Restraints policy, dated 9/2/29, showed: -Policy Statement: Restraints are devices that prevent or restrict certain actions and/or behaviors and are not easily removed. There are Federal Regulations that govern the use of restraints on residents in long-term care facilities. Restraint usage can increase the scope and severity of injury. It is the goal of the facility to be restraint free in accordance with clinical best practices; -Policy: In order to provide the best possible care to residents, both physically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice when staff failed to transcribe a new order, resulting in the treatment not administered for one resident (Resident #24). The sample was 13. The census was 46. Review of the facility's Medical Provider Orders policy, dated reviewed/revised 4/17/22, showed: -If using electronic medication records, input the medication and/or treatment order according to the electronic health record (EHR) instructions and facility policy; -When a new order changes the dosage of a previously prescribed medication, discontinue the order as per the electronic software instructions and retype the new order; -Validate the new order in the electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR)/Treatment Administration Record (TAR); Review of the facility's Medication Orders policy, dated effective 6/1/18, showed: -Orders sent with the resident from an office visit, the nurse on duty at the time the order is received enters it on the physician order sheet telephone order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accident hazards by not maintaining water temperatures in resident rooms on the 100 hall and in the unlocked and accessible staff break room, between 105 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 120 degrees F. This affected five sampled resident rooms, which included Resident #5. The temperatures at the sinks measured as high as 143 F. The sample size was 13. The census was 46. 1. Observations on 5/12/25 of the unlocked accessible employee break room handwashing sink, showed: -At 10:35 A.M., the water measured 137.8 F.; -At 11:50 A.M., the water measured 143 F.; -At 2:20 P.M., the water measured 139.0 F. Review of the facility's temperature logs, showed no documentation of temperatures for the employee break room. 2. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/17/25, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Uses a manual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy when staff failed to ensure one resident's dialysis (a procedure that cleanses the blood of its impurities) communication logs were completed for all appointments (Resident #42). The facility identified one resident who received dialysis services. The sample was 13. The census was 46. Review of the facility's Dialysis Communication policy, dated 2/21, showed: -Director of Nursing (DON) or designee will contact dialysis unit to establish the communication, explain the facility will be sending a communication form that will facilitate the sharing of resident information surrounding dialysis; -A dialysis communication form will be used to send information to and from the facility to the dialysis center and back; -The nurse in charge of the care of the resident on the days of scheduled dialysis shall initiate the dialysis communication form and will ensure the form is sent with the resident; -Upon return of the resident from the dialysis center, the nurse in charge of the resident will review the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when one resident (Resident #3) had a significant increase in pain identified on 12/18/24 and had to wait over 12 hours for an x-ray order to be obtained. The x-ray completed on 12/19/24 showed the resident had a right hip fracture and the resident was sent to the hospital for further evaluation and treatment. The sample was 6. The census was 48. Review of the facility's Change in Condition Nursing Intervention policy, dated 2/18/16 and revised 9/19/19, showed: -Policy Statement: Because of the age and condition of residents in a nursing home, they are subject to many changes in condition. Changes in condition require assessment and documentation by a licensed nurse; -Policy: To assure that all residents receive appropriate care in accordance with acceptable medical practice and standards, changes in condition will be assessed in a timely manner with appropriate interventions and countermeasures as necessary.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided meet professional standards of practice when a facility nurse pre-pulled medications for residents, documented the medications as administered, and never administered the medications. This resulted in nine residents not receiving their ordered medications (Residents #4, #5, #11, #7, #9, #8, #10, #1 and #12). The census was 44. The sample was 14. The administrator was notified on 6/21/24, of the past non-compliance. The facility educated staff of the requirement to administer medications at the time they are pulled and that only the staff person who pulls the medications are allowed to administer the medication. The facility conducted an investigation to determine which residents were affected and are monitoring ongoing compliance. The deficiency was corrected on 6/10/24. Review of the Controlled Substance Policy, revised 2/2021, showed: Controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage. disposal and record-keeping requirements. The facility will maintain compliance with these special…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2), diagnosed as having dementia with behavioral disturbance and exhibiting increased symptoms/behaviors such as striking the same resident (Resident #1) in the head twice on two separate occasions (3/4/24 and 4/24/24), received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his/her highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being, by failing to implement an ordered psychiatric consult or update the resident's care plan until after the second incident. The first incident caused a laceration above Resident #1's left eyebrow. The sample size was 3. The census was 47. Review of Resident #2's hospital records, prior to the facility admission, dated 9/26/23, showed: Patient is presenting with concern for self neglect and possible injury to himself/herself with firearm. He/She was brought in by family to emergency room (ER) on 9/23 after reportedly hitting his/her head near the support beam of his/her car port. He/She reports to me no loss of consciousness. Apparently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's rights to be free from physical abuse was not violated (Resident #1) when a resident (Resident #2) hit the other resident in the eye. This resulted in a laceration. The census was 45. The sample was 3. The Director of Nursing (DON) was notified on 3/08/24, of the past non-compliance. The facility immediately took steps to protect the resident and set interventions in place to prevent further abuse. Staff were in-serviced on resident safety. The deficiency was corrected on 3/4/24. Review of the facility's undated Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition policy, showed: -Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Resident must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the residents, family member or legal guardians, friend, or other individuals; -Abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 25 opportunities, three errors occurred, resulting in a 12% error rate (Residents #44, #254, and #30). In addition, the facility failed to have a policy to address when medications are due based on the codes entered into the medical record. The census was 49. 1. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated [DATE], showed: -Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the medical provider and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection; -Review the medication administration record to identify medications to be administered; -Administer medications as ordered in accordance with manufacturer specifications; -Sign the medication administration record after administration. 2. Review of Resident #44's medical record, showed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were discarded according to the expiration date for one of two medication carts reviewed with expired medicine that remained in the cart. This resulted in one resident being administered expired insulin (Resident #44). In addition, the facility failed to permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys to the medication room. The facility identified having one medication room and four medication/treatment carts. The census was 49. Review of the facility's Labeling of Medications and Biologicals policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: -All medications and biologicals used in the facility will be labeled in accordance with current state and federal regulations to facilitate consideration of precautions and safe administration of medications; -Medication labels must be legible at all times. Review of the facility's Medication Storage policy, dated 9/1/23, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of the residents by failing to ensure the quality of the labs obtained. The facility failed to follow manufactures directions for blood glucose (sugar) test strips to ensure accurate results. Improperly stored test strips were used to check residents' blood sugar levels (Resident #7, #1, #25, and #44). The census was 49. Review of the facility's Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certification of waiver, effective 9/1/22 and expiration 8/31/24, showed: -Laboratory name and address, listed the facility name and address; -The above named laboratory located at the address shown hereon may accept human specimens for the purpose of performing laboratory examinations or procedures. 1. Observation and interview on 12/12/23 at 12:47 P.M., showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C opened a medication cart and said there are two certified medication technician (CMT) carts, a treatment cart, and a nurse medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident only self-administered medications after the interdisciplinary team had determined which medications may be self-administered, for one of one resident observed to have medications left at the bedside for later self-administration, for two of three days of survey. The sample was 13. The census was 49. Review of the facility's Resident Self-Administration of Medication policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medications. A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely; -The results of the interdisciplinary team assessment is placed in the resident's medical record; -The care plan must reflect resident self-administration and storage arrangements for such medications. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 9/1/21, showed: -Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper transfer techniques were utilized in the transfer of dependent residents. This failure occurred in one of one stand-by assist transfers observed, for one resident (Resident #13). The sample size was 13. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility's Transfer Techniques Policy, revised 4/17/19, showed: -The use of appropriate devices (lifts, gait belts, draw sheets, etc.) to provide a safe means of lifting or transferring residents, when used properly, protect both the resident and the employee from injury; -In order to prevent injury to staff or residents, employees shall use appropriate devices to transfer/ambulate/reposition residents; -Gait belts should be used for residents who are able to provide moderate assistance and are affected on one side of their body to ensure safe transfers/ambulation; -Assess resident needs when choosing transfer devices. It's always better to have more help than not enough, for you and the resident. Review of Resident #13's record, showed: -admission date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when staff administered expired insulin to a resident (Resident #44). The census was 49. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated [DATE], showed: -Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the medical provider and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection; -Review the medication administration record to identify medications to be administered; -Identify expiration date. If expired, notify the nurse manager; -Administer medications as ordered in accordance with manufacturer specifications; -Sign the medication administration record after administration. Review of Resident #44's medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included diabetes; -An order dated [DATE], for Novolog (short acting insulin), inject 3 units subcutaneously (under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-09-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — widespread
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of the residents by failing to ensure the quality of the labs obtained when they failed to meet the applicable requirements for obtaining their own labs. The facility failed to follow manufactures directions for quality control check of the blood glucose (sugar) test machines to ensure accurate results. The census was 51. Review of the quality control solution for the blood glucose machine manufacturer's directions, also provided by the facility as the policy for completing quality control checks, titled Performing a Control Solution Test, showed: -You should check your meter and test strips using Assure Prism Control Solution. The control solution ranges are printed on the labels. Compare the results displayed on the meter to the control solution range printed on the vial or box. Before using a new meter or a new vial/box of test strips, you should conduct a control solution test; -Note: Check the expiration dates printed on the bottle. When you first open a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-24 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment for one resident who had wounds at the time of the assessment (Resident #9) and for five of five residents investigated for hospice who had a life expectancy of less than six months (Residents #5, #12, #16, #14 and #34). The facility identified 12 residents as receiving hospice services. The sample was 13. The census was 51. 1. Review of Resident #9's admission wound assessment, dated 6/17/21, showed a left lower leg stasis ulcer (breakdown of the skin caused by fluid build-up from poor vein function) was present on admission and measured 13 centimeters (cm) in length, 11 cm wide, and 0.3 cm deep. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/18/21, showed the total number of arterial (caused by poor blood supply) and venous (result from valve incompetence in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis services received meet professional standards of practice for one resident who received dialysis services (Resident #17). The facility failed to ensure staff completed post dialysis assessments per their policy and acceptable standards of practice. The facility identified as only having one resident on dialysis services. The census was 51. Review of the facility's Dialysis Resident Care policy, dated 10/14/18, showed: -Policy statement: To maintain best clinical practices for shunt (dialysis access site) care and resident's receiving dialysis; -Policy: To monitor and educate staff and residents about good post-dialysis care; -Procedure included: -Assess residents upon return from dialysis treatment and document in nurse's notes: -Monitor blood pressure, report low or high blood pressure; -Watch for bleeding-apply direct firm pressure on area for 7-10 minutes if bleeding occurs. If bleeding cannot be controlled/continues longer than 30 min, call 911; -Assess access site for bruit (the sound heard as blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were not kept past their expiration date and that medications for residents who were no longer in the facility were removed from the active medication supply for one of one medication room, one of one medication cart and one of one treatment cart observed. In addition, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and controlled substances behind two locked compartments when the medication room door was left propped open with no staff present and as a resident walked independently past the door (Resident #15). The facility identified having one medication room, three medication carts and one treatment cart. The census was 51. Review of the facility's Medication Storage in the Facility policy, dated June 1, 2018, showed: -Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable food and serve what was listed on the menu for one resident (Resident #5) out of six residents who received a pureed diet. The facility also failed to follow the recipes for pureed diets and provide the amount of food specified on the menu. The census was 51. 1. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/7/21, showed: Severe cognitive impairment; -Total dependence on staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, personal hygiene and eating; -Diagnoses included: Cachexia (general weight loss occurring during course of chronic disease), progressive neurological condition, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, non-Alzheimer's dementia and anxiety disorder. Record review of the resident's electronic physician order sheet (ePOS), showed regular diet, pureed texture, and regular consistency. Review of the residents, medical record,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and date food when it was removed out of the original container. The census was 51. Review of the facility's policy dated 8/12/18, regarding Food Safety Storage Labeling and Dating, showed: -Foods will be properly stored, labeled and dated according to current practice standards; -All items must be dated when received and not kept longer than three days after receipt; -Items past the safe use by date will be discarded; -Administrator will check in dietary and nursing refrigerators at least weekly. Observation on 9/22/21 at 9:26 A.M. and showed the following -In the freezer, three bags hash browns not dated and taken out of the original box; -In the freezer, four bags of spinach not dated and taken out of the original box; -In the freezer, one bag of mixed vegetables in a zip lock bag, 2 bags of peas, 4 bags of green beans, 5 bags of vegetables not dated, one bag of approximately 30 chicken patties in a zip lock bag not dated; one bag of several pizza crusts not in its original bag not dated; -In the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the transmission of infections. Staff failed to follow proper hand hygiene and infection control procedures for four of four perineal (the area to include the buttocks and the genitals) care observations (Residents #19, #5, #29 and #42). Staff failed to perform proper hand hygiene before adjusting or assisting a resident with their face mask (Resident #10). Staff touched a resident's sandwich with bare hands. Staff failed to properly sanitize a shared Hoyer lift (mechanical lift) before and/or after use (Resident #36). Staff used resident personal care items to turn on and off the water prior to using them on the resident (Resident #2). In addition, staff failed to ensure a resident who provided services for the facility, followed the same infection control practices expected of staff when setting up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' personal privacy during personal care. One resident was left naked and exposed while staff allowed housekeeping into the room to clean (Resident #19). In addition, staff failed to ensure a resident was not visible from the hallway when partially dressed while staff were present and that the resident was not visible to the roommate during incontinence care (Resident #5). This affected two of four residents observed during incontinence care. The census was 51. Review of the facility's admission packet, provided to residents upon admission to the facility, showed Know Your Rights: You have the right to privacy in medical treatment and personal care. You should be treated with consideration and respect, with full recognition of your dignity and individuality. Review of the facility's Incontinence Care policy, dated 10/1/99, showed: -Each resident deserves to be clean and dry; -Policy: To ensure adequate hygiene and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible for one of two mechanical lift transfers one of three stand by transfers observed (Residents #2 and #29). The census was 51. Review of the facility's Transfer Techniques policy, dated 4/17/19, showed: -Policy statement: Use of appropriate devices (lifts, belts, draw sheets, etc.) provide a safe means of lifting or transferring residents and, when used properly, protect both the resident and the employee from injury; -Lifts: Use for totally dependent residents or anyone with contractures (tightening of the tendons and joints resulting loss in range of motion), amputations, obesity, etc. Do not attempt to use the lift unless you have been trained and feel comfortable with the procedures. Do not lift alone, there must always be 2 staff members when using one of the lifts. Make sure to widen the base of the lift before use. Never use a frayed or ripped sling.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from any significant medication errors, for one resident (Resident #16) who was administered expired insulin. The census was 51. Review of the facility's Medication Storage in the Facility policy, dated [DATE], showed outdated, contaminated or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled or without secure closures are immediately removed from inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal, and reordered from the pharmacy if a current order exists. Review of Resident #16's electronic medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis (a serous diabetes complication where the body produces excess blood acids) without coma and type 1 diabetes (a chronic form of diabetes that typically appears in adolescence) with unspecified complications; -Review of the resident's electronic physician order sheet, showed: -An order dated [DATE], for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-05-15 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to mail delivered on the weekend. This had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. The census was 46. Review of the facility's Residents' Right policy, revised December 2016, showed: -Policy Statement: -Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -Federal and state laws guarantee basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: -A dignified existence; -Be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity; -Communication with and access to people and services, both inside and outside the facility; -Exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as a resident or citizen of the United States; -Be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights; -Access to a telephone, mail, and email; -Communicate in person and by mail, email, and telephone with privacy; Review of the admission packet provided to the residents, showed: -Authorization to have mail…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-13 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post in a place readily accessible to residents, and family members and legal representatives of residents, the results of the most recent survey of the facility. The facility posted the survey results in the library on the top shelf, out of reach of residents or visitor who require the use of a wheelchair. The census was 49. Review of a sign, posted near the front entrance, showed survey results available for review in activities, social services, and the facility library. Observation on 12/12/23 at 9:32 A.M., showed the survey binder located in the library, approximately 6.5 to 7 feet up the air, on a bookshelf. At 9:40 A.M., the Social Worker pointed out a survey binder located in her office on a bookshelf, behind her desk. She said her office is locked when she is not in the building. Observation of the activity's office, showed the door was locked. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D and the Social Worker said the activity's office is locked because the Activities Director is not currently in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNITY CARE CENTERS — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WEINER, CRAIGIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 06/01/2024
WEINER, GINAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 06/01/2024
COUNTRY LIFE ACRES GMW GST NON-EXEMPT TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
FIRST MID BANK & TRUST NAOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
GC OF LEMAY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
GC ASSET MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
MOUGHAL, CATHERINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
GC ASSET HOLDING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
GAO, SHAWNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
GIBBS, KAYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$169K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 89%Medicare 5%Other / private 6%

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $169K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$223per resident / day
operating cost
$6,771per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$230per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265775. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next