Seneca Nursing
914 Chickesaw Street, Seneca, MO 64865 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (417) 776-8041 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0570)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.2% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 9.3% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.9% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.8% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 33.9% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.0% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.1% | 17.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.9% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.1% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.5% | 63.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.1% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.1% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.33 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.96 | 2.33 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 7.5–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.5%CMS range 6.2–19.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.56 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 46.2 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.78 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.86 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate the right of self-determination for every resident when staff failed to honor reasonable shower preferences for three residents (Resident #6, #7, and #8). The facility census was 53.Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to showers. 1. Review of Resident #6 's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 09/15/25;-Diagnoses included infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee prosthesis (replaces damaged bone and cartilage in the left knee with metal and plastic components, aiming to relieve pain and restore function), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), dementia (chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), and uninhibited neuropathic bladder (type of bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from sexual and physical abuse when one resident (Resident #1) exhibited repeated behaviors against others, including touching breasts and chest, biting chest and attempted to lay on another resident unclothed. The attempts at unwanted contact impacted three residents (Resident #2, #3, and #4). The facility census was 53.Review of the facility policy Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition Policy, dated 2021, showed the following:-Each resident had the right to be free from abuse, corporal, punishment, and involuntary seclusion;-Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals;-Resident behaviors will be monitored for changes, which trigger abusive behaviors;-The facility will reassess care plan interventions on a regular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report all allegations of abuse immediately to facility management and to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required two-hour timeframe when staff did not report multiple allegations of abuse involving four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4). The facility census was 53.Review of the facility policy Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition Policy, dated 2021, showed the following:-Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal, punishment, and involuntary seclusion;-Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals;-Resident abuse must be reported immediately to the Administrator;-The facility Administrator, employee, or agent who is made aware of any allegation of abuse or neglect shall report or cause a report to be made to the mandated state agency per reporting criteria;-The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete timely and thorough investigations of all allegations of abuse when staff failed to document investigation into allegations of abuse involving four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4). The facility also failed to document steps taken to protect all residents during the investigation. The facility census was 53.Review of the facility policy Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition Policy. dated 2021, showed the following:-Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal, punishment, and involuntary seclusion;-Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals;-The facility Administrator will ensure a thorough investigation of alleged violations of individual rights and document appropriate action;-While a facility investigation is under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have services in place to ensure the accurate document of administration of controlled pain medications for three resident's (Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4). The facility census was 45.Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, dated 06/01/18, showed the following:-Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal and recordkeeping in the facility in accordance with federal, state and other applicable laws and regulations;-The medication regimen of residents using medications that have such discrepancies are reviewed to assure the resident has received all medications ordered and the goal of therapy is met;-Current controlled substance accountability records are kept in the Medication Administration Record (MAR), or designated book.1. Review of Resident #2's face sheet (admission data) showed the following:-admission date of 11/16/21;-Diagnoses included low back pain, muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of labs out of normal ranges when staff failed to notify one resident's (Resident #1) physician of critical lab results. The facility census was 45.Review of the facility's policy titled Significant Condition Change and Notification, undated, showed the following:-To ensure that the resident's family and/or representative and medical practitioner are notified of resident changes such as those listed below:-A significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status including abnormal lab values;-When the above situation exists, the licensed nurse will contact the resident's representative and their medical practitioner;-Calls will be made to the resident's representative until they are reached. A message may be left on an answering machine that does not give specifics but leaves a request for the facility to be called;-The medical practitioner will be contacted immediately for any emergencies regardless of the time of day. Non-emergency notifications may be made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents' records were complete and accurate when staff failed to document one resident (Resident #1) sliding out of a chair. The facility census was 45.Review of the facility's policy titled, Significant Condition Change and Notification, undated, showed the following:-All significant changes will be recorded on the communication board in the computer and in the resident record. Charting will include an assessment of the resident's current status as it relates to the change in condition. Charting will be done each shift for 72 hours for resident with change of condition. Change of condition is reviewed by Director of Nursing (DON) or designee for the continued need for additional documentation. Review of the facility's policy titled Charting and Documentation, dated February 2021, showed the following:-Chart all pertinent changes in the resident's condition, reaction to treatments, medication as well as routine observations;-Be concise, accurate, and complete and use objective terms. Document only the facts.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care per standards of practice when staff failed to clarify hospital discharge orders for pulse oximetry (a test used to measure the oxygen level of the blood), failed to have the resident's oxygen order on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR), and failed to document oxygen usage and pulse oximetry readings for one resident (Residents #1). The facility census was 50. Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, dated February 2021, showed the following: -Verify there is a physician's order for oxygen administration; -After completing the oxygen setup or adjustment, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: the date and time that the procedure was performed; the rate of oxygen flow, route; the frequency and duration of the treatment; the reason for as needed (PRN) administration; if the resident refused the procedure, the reason(s) why and the intervention taken; and the signature and title of the person recording the data. 1. Review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete medical records for all residents when staff failed to document full details and notifications related to one resident (Resident #1) who died at the facility. The facility census was 50. Review of the facility's policy titled Charting and Documentation, dated February 2021, showed the following: -Chart all pertinent changes in the resident's condition, reaction to treatments, medications as well as routine observations; -Be concise, accurate and complete and use objective terms. Document only the facts. Use only approved abbreviations and symbols; -For death of a resident document code status of resident and whether CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation - an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) was performed; pertinent information before death (example, symptoms, vital signs, treatments, etc); date and time of death; name of physician notified and when notified; time resident representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-13 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespreadEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure six nurse aides (NA) ( NA B, NA G, NA J, NA K, NA L,and NA C) completed a certified nurse aide (CNA) training program and obtained certification within four months of employment at the facility as a nurse aide. The facility census was 53. Review showed the facility did not provide a nurse aide certification or training policy. 1. Review of a facility list of current nurse aides showed NA B had an initial hire date of 03/28/23 and a rehire date of 12/07/24. Review of the facility's October 2024, November 2024, and December 2024, showed NA B scheduled to work. During interviews on 01/09/25, at 2:26 P.M., and on 01/13/24, at 11:00 A.M., NA B said the following: -He/she had worked at the facility for a month; -He/she had previously worked at the facility for a few years, but left and came back; -He/she provided all care to residents by herself unless the task requires two people; -He/she was not in a CNA class now, but planned to be in the next class; -The next class for nurse aides starts in February.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all controlled medications were stored per standards of practice when controlled substances were not stored in a locked compartment. The facility's census was 53. Review of the facility policy Controlled Substance Policy, revised October 2022, showed the following: -Controlled substances were subject to special handling, storage, disposal and record-keeping requirements; -Controlled substances in Schedules II, III, and IV were subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and record-keeping requirements. Such drugs were to be accessible only to authorized nursing and pharmacy personnel. The Director of Nursing (DON) was responsible for the control of such drugs; -Drugs listed in Schedules II, III, and IV were to be stored under double-lock conditions; -The key to the separately locked storage area is not the same key that is used to gain access to other drugs; -The medication nurse or certified medication tech (CMT) on duty at the time will maintain possession of the key; -The key must remain the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when staff failed to perform proper hand hygiene when performing personal cares for two residents (Resident #46 and #38), when staff failed to have an Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control measures used to reduce transmission of resistant organisms) policy, and when staff failed to follow EBP when providing care to one resident (Resident #5) with a wound. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility policy Hand Hygiene, dated 2019, showed the following: -Purpose to cleanse hands to prevent the spread of potentially deadly infections; -Purpose to provide a clean and healthy environment for residents, staff and visitors; -Purpose to reduce the risk to the healthcare provider of colonization (when a microorganism survives on a host without causing disease. This can happen on the skin, in the respiratory tract, or in the gastrointestinal tract) or infections acquired from a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep all residents free from misappropriation of resident property when the staff could not account for 30 doses of medication for one resident (Resident #14) that had been signed by staff as being received from the pharmacy. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility policy Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition, revised 10/2022, showed the following: -Misappropriation of resident property is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings without the resident's consent; -The facility prohibits misappropriation of resident property; -The owner, licensee, administrator, employee or agent of the facility must prohibit the misappropriation of resident property; -The facility employee who becomes aware of alleged misappropriation of resident property, shall immediately report the matter to the administrator; -The facility administrator will ensure a thorough investigation of alleged violations of individual rights and document appropriate action. If a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an abuse/neglect policy that ensured all reported allegations of possible abuse were reported to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services-DHSS) within two hours when staff failed to report a documented allegation of verbal abuse involving two residents (Resident #7 & #35). The facility census was 53. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, undated showed the following: -Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff or other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends or other individuals. -The facility administrator is designated as the facility abuse coordinator. -Resident abuse must be reported to the administrator immediately. Review of the facility policy titled, Reporting Policy, undated,showed the following: -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an abuse/neglect policy that ensured staff completed and documented a timely investigation of all reported allegations of possible abuse when staff failed to complete a documented investigation of a documented allegation of verbal abuse involving two residents resident (Resident #7 and #35). The facility census was 53. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, undated, showed the following: -Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff or other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends or other individuals; -The facility administrator is designated as the facility abuse coordinator and will be responsible for overseeing the Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program and directing any abuse investigation; -Resident abuse must be reported to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to routinely monitor for edema (swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body tissues), failed to notify the physician of changes in weight and edema, and failed to apply interventions as ordered for one resident (Resident #2). The facility census was 53. Review of a facility policy titled Significant Condition Change and Notification, undated, showed the following: -Facility to ensure the resident's family and/or representative and medical practitioner are notified of the following resident changes: new wounds, bruises, or skin tears; abrupt onset of edema; onset of swelling; or a need to significantly alter treatment. When any of the listed situations exists, the nurse will contact the resident representative and their medical practitioner; -Medical practitioner contacted immediately for emergencies. Non-emergency practitioner notifications may be made the next morning if situation occurs late evening or night shift; -Each attempt will be charted as to the time the call was made, who was spoken to, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an environment as safe and as free from accident hazards as possible when staff failed to complete a safe transfer, as care planned, for one resident (Resident #46) and when staff failed to care plan and transfer one resident (Resident #38) who was non-weight bearing in a safe fashion. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility policy Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, reviewed 02/2021, showed the following: -Resident safety, dignity, comfort and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding safe lifting and moving of residents; -Manual lifting of residents shall be eliminated when feasible; -Staff responsible for direct resident care will be trained in the use of manual (gait/transfer belts, slide boards) and mechanical lifting devices. 1. Review of Resident #46's face sheet (admission information) showed the following: -admission date of 06/03/24; -Diagnoses that included dementia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in accordance with standards of practice when staff had bare hand contact with food and food contact surfaces while assisting residents with meals. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility policy Hand Hygiene, dated 2019, showed the following: -The purpose was to cleanse hands to prevent the spread of potentially deadly infections; -The purpose was to provide a clean and healthy environment for residents, staff and visitors; -Hand hygiene was the primary means of preventing the transmission of infection. Review of the 2022 Food Code, by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), showed the following: -Bare hand contact with ready-to-eat foods can contribute to the transmission of food borne illness; -There should be no bare hand with ready-to-eat food. 2. Observation on 01/08/25, at 12:12 P.M., during the lunch meal service, showed the following: -Nurse Assistant (NA) B was in the dining room talking to a resident and touching the resident's clothing while rubbing the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated with dignity and respect when one staff member (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B) placed his/her hand close to one resident's (Resident #1) mouth while providing cares to the resident to muffle the sound of the resident yelling. Four residents were sampled out of a facility census of 50. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, undated, showed the following: -Residents have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside facility; -A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Facility must protect and promote rights of resident; -Residents have a right to be treated with respect and dignity. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance) showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect all resident's from misappropriation of property when a staff member had one resident's (Resident #1's) personal cellular phone, in his/her possession. The facility census was 52. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, revised November 2018, showed the following: -Misappropriation of resident property is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent; -The facility prohibits misappropriation of resident property; -The facility will not knowingly employ individuals who have been found guilty of abusing , neglecting, or mistreating residents or misappropriating their properties. 1. Review of Resident #1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 11/03/23, showed the following: -admission date of 01/19/23; -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Dependent on staff assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-06 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a Director of Food and Nutrition Services (Dietary Manager) with required education/training in food service management. The facility census was 53. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to the qualifications of the Dietary Manager. 1. During interviews on 3/1/23, at 8:12 A.M., and 3/3/23, at 10:50 A.M., [NAME] A said the following: -The facility did not have a Dietary Manager (DM) and had not had one for at least six months; -He/she completed the ordering and general upkeep in the kitchen including cleanliness, temperatures of refrigerators and freezers and food, and ensured food items were marked and dated; -The Administrator completed the hiring; -The facility placed advertisements for a DM, but he/she did not know if they received any responses; -The Registered Dietician (RD) came to the facility monthly and as needed. The RD was available by telephone if kitchen staff had questions. The RD inspected the kitchen and asked kitchen staff if they had questions on his/her visits. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to assist the residents to meet on a regular basis and failed to designated a staff person responsible for providing assistance with the meeting and responding to resident concerns brought forth in the meetings. The facility census was 53. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding resident council meetings 1. During a group interview on 03/02/23, at 10:07 AM, the residents said the following: -They do not have regular resident council meetings, but they would like for there to be; -The residents said the council is supposed to meet once a month; -There was a consensus that the council did meet in January of this year; -One resident said there has only been one resident council meeting, and it was last calendar year sometime; -When noting concerns in group, it is difficult to find specific staff where to direct concerns. Sometimes staff get back with you, sometimes they don't. During an interview on 3/1/23, at 11:00 A.M., the Resident Council President said the last meeting was last year sometime.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-06 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond in an amount sufficient to ensure protection of all resident funds for two of the last twelve months. The facility's census was 53. Record review of the facility's policy titled Facility Resident Trust Fund Policy, revised May 2012, showed the following: -It will be the policy of the management company that the resident trust fund is managed and accounted for in accordance with state and federal regulations. Each facility should follow the state guidelines of the payment programs using the greatest level of specificity if requirements vary in state and federal programs; -The facility shall purchase and maintain a surety bond that will protect resident personal funds against loss, theft, and insolvency. The surety bond must be greater than all resident funds managed by the facility and adheres to state and federal guidelines. 1. Record review of the facility's documented surety bond showed the facility had an approved bond for $80,000.00. Record review of the facility's reconciled bank statement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when the home did not provide routine showers/baths to three dependent residents (Residents #40, #42, and #207). The facility census was 53. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to bathing/showers. 1. Record review of the facility's Shower Schedule showed the following: -Shower sheets must be filled out and given to the charge nurse. If a resident refuses, try again then notify the charge nurse; -Showers scheduled for Monday/Thursday, Tuesday/Friday and Wednesday/Thursday with residents' names and two numbered lines next to the residents' names. 2. Record review of Resident #207's face sheet (a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance), showed the following: -The resident admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 3/1/23; -Diagnoses included cerebral infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed have an effective activity program when the home failed to provided to routinely scheduled activities for residents including two residents (Resident #17 and #42); failed to care plan residents' activity preferences and need for three residents (Resident #9, #207, and #208); and when the facility documented residents participated in activities when the residents were not present for the activity three residents (Resident #9, #22, and #208). The facility census was 53. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to the Activity Program. 1. Observation on 3/3/23, at 9:28 A.M., of the large activity calendar by the dining room showed the scheduled activities of 7:00 A.M. news with breakfast, 10:00 A.M. chair yoga, 11:30 A.M. coffee talk, and 2:30 P.M. fun with bingo/fun word games. Observation on 3/3/23, at 10:15 A.M., showed no activity of chair yoga took place throughout the facility. Observation on 3/3/23, at 2:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store a large amount of discontinued medications in a secure proper storage area in the facility. The facility census was 53. Record review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications, dated 6/1/18, showed the following: -Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications; -Only licensed nurses, pharmacy personnel, and those lawfully authorized to administer medications (such as medication aide) permitted to access medications. Medication rooms, carts. and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with authorized access; -Except for those requiring refrigeration or freezing, medications intended for internal use are stored in a medication cart or other designated area; -Medication storage conditions are monitored on a quarterly basis by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the required two step Tuberculosis (TB - a potentially serious airborne bacterial infection affecting the lungs that spreads through the air when a person with TB coughs, sneezes, or talks) screening test was completed for all residents when the TB two-step test was not completed for two residents (Resident #23 and Resident #51) and staff failed to read the first step and administer the second step of the initial TB screening test for one resident (Resident #20). The facility had a census of 53. Record review of the facility policy titled Tuberculosis Surveillance, undated, showed the following: -It is facility policy to comply with state regulation for TB testing for residents; -All residents who do not have a history of positive TB tests will have the initial Mantoux Skin Test completed within one month prior to or one week after admission to the facility; -For those same residents, the second step of the Mantoux Skin Test will be completed one to three weeks after the first step was completed 1. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents or residents' representative were provided education regarding and offered the pneumococcal vaccine when staff failed to document education and offering the pneumococcal vaccine to four residents (Residents #6, #19, #23, and #51). The facility census was 53. Record review of the facility policy titled Resident Pneumococcal Immunization Policy, undated, showed the following: -It is facility policy to offer pneumococcal immunizations to all residents; -All residents will be assessed on admission to see if they have previously been immunized; -Immunization status will be recorded in the resident immunization record; -If residents have not received a pneumococcal vaccine, it will be offered to them; -The facility will follow Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for pneumococcal immunizations. 1. Record review of Resident #51's immunization record showed the following: -admission date of 9/16/22; -Staff did not document offering the pneumococcal vaccine offered or any education…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had a comprehensive care plan that addressed each resident's needs when staff failed to care plan one resident's (Resident #23) foley catheter (a flexible tube that a clinician passes through the urethra (the duct by which urine is conveyed out of the body from the bladder) and into the bladder to drain urine) and interventions related to the foley catheter and failed to care plan one resident's (Resident #207) anxiety and depression and anxiety and depression medications and failed to include interventions related to the resident's anxiety and depression. The facility census was 53. Record review of the facility's policy titled Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team, reviewed 2/2021, showed the following: -Every resident will be assessed using the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff); -The purpose is to assess each resident's strengths, weaknesses, and care needs and use this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent pain management for all residents when the facility did not have a prescribed pain medication on-site for one resident (Resident #40) for multiple days. The facility had a census of 53. Record review of the facility's policy Medication Ordering and Receiving From Pharmacy, dated 06/01/18, showed the following: -Medications are received from the dispensing pharmacy on a timely basis. The facility maintains accurate records of medication order and receipt; -Refills are written on a medication order form/ordered by peeling the refill label and placing it in the appropriate area on the order for provided by the pharmacy for that purpose and/or ordered electronically ordered; -Reorder medication at least three to four days in advance of need, as directed by the pharmacy order and delivery schedule, to assure an adequate supply is on hand; -The nurse who reorders the medication is responsible for notifying the pharmacy of changes in directions for use. 1. Record review of Resident #40's face sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to obtain stop dates of 14 days or less on as needed (PRN) anti-psychotropic medication (a chemical substance that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness or behavior) for two residents (Resident #9 and #23). The facility census was 53. Record review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use, reviewed 02/2021, showed the following: -Residents will only receive psychotropic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective; -Residents who are admitted from the community or transferred from a hospital and who are already receiving psychotropic medications will be evaluated for the appropriateness and indications for use. The interdisciplinary team will: re-evaluate the use of the psychotropic medication at the time of admission to consider whether or not the medication can be reduced, tapered, or discontinued per regulation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #14) medication regime was free from unnecessary medications when the facility failed to ensure the physician provided a rationale for administering a psychotropic medication (drugs that alter chemical levels in the brain which impact mood and behavior, used to treat mental illnesses).The facility also failed to provide a rationale to continue an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication past 14 days for one resident (Resident #28). A sample of 13 residents was reviewed in a facility with a census of 47. Record review of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website showed the following: -Seroquel (quetiapine, an antipsychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia (disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), bipolar disorder (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), and depression, may cause serious side effects, including risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with an error rate of less than five percent when staff made two errors out of 25 opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 8.0 percent affecting one resident (Resident #13). The facility census was 47. According to Medscape website (medical reference website for healthcare professionals) showed the following: -Rapid-acting insulin can cause hypoglycemia (low blood glucose). This may occur when enough calories are not consumed after taking the insulin within the time frame; -Older adults may be more sensitive to the side effects of low blood glucose from rapid acting insulin's. Record review of the Novolog (rapid-acting insulin) undated manufacturer's insert showed the following: -Novolog starts acting fast; -A meal should be eaten within five to ten minutes of taking a dose of Novolog; -Dosage adjustments may be needed in regards to timing of food intake. Record review of the facility's policy titled Insulin Administration dated September 2014, showed the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNITY CARE CENTERS — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEINER, CRAIG | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 06/01/2023 |
| WEINER, GINA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 06/01/2023 |
| GC ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/11/2024 |
| MITCHELL, REBECCA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/28/2025 |
| WILLIAMS, CHERYL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/28/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $541K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265491. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.