Northern Nevada State Veterans Home
36 Battleborn Way, Sparks, NV 89431 · For profit - Corporation · 96 certified beds · (763) 537-5700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.0% | 12.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 5.1% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 2.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.1% | 13.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.4% | 22.2% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 89.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 5.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.7% | 15.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.4% | 17.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.5% | 1.8% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.9% | 80.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.25 | 1.85 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.96 | 1.45 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.15 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 93.3 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.37 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.51 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.15 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to reasonably accommodate the documented allergy of garlic for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #20). This deficient practice had the potential to cause emotional distress and/or physical harm to the resident. Findings include:Resident #20Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, and muscle weakness.On 03/31/2026 at 12:57 PM, Resident #20 expressed fear of eating garlic due to concern it could result in an undignified death from colic and severe gastrointestinal distress. Resident #20 verbalized when receiving an alternate meal in place of the regular meal, the resident did not receive any side items, including dessert. Resident #20's clinical record section Allergies, dated 05/02/2025, documented Resident #20's allergens included garlic, and severe allergy type.Physician's order dated 05/05/2025, documented regular diet, regular texture, regular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free from physical and/or mental abuse for 2 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #10 and #13). This deficient practice resulted in the resident being subjected to both physical and mental abuse, causing emotional distress and posing a potential risk for physical injury and a decline in psychosocial well being.Findings include:Resident #10Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, unspecified, dementia in other disease classified elsewhere, severe, and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type.A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) final report dated 09/30/2025, documented on 09/26/2025, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA1) had grabbed Resident #10 by the arm while attempting to take the resident to the resident's room. CNA1 had also roughly placed the resident's baseball cap on the resident's head.A Nursing Progress Note dated 09/26/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic medication was administered in a timely manner as ordered by the physician order for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #3). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed treatment, worsening clinical condition, and avoidable decline in health status. Findings include:Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, unspecified, embolism and thrombosis of arteries of the lower extremities, acquired absence of right leg above knee, and infection following a procedure, deep incisional surgical site, sequela. Resident #3's Care Plan dated 02/02/2026, documented surgical wound to right above the knee amputation. Wound dehiscence with wound infection. A physician order dated 03/05/2026, documented Bactrim Double Strength Oral Tablet 800-160 milligrams (mg), give one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a handwashing station was stocked with disposable hand towels, 2) dry food was appropriately stored, and 3) food was prepared and served in a sanitary manner. These deficient practices had the potential to increase the risk of infection and foodborne illnesses in the facility. Findings include:Handwashing StationOn 03/30/2026 at 9:24 AM, during a tour of the Aspen Pinion Serving Kitchen, the handwashing station was not stocked with disposable hand towels.On 03/30/2026 at 9:24 AM, the Culinary Director (CD) confirmed the lack of disposable hand towels at the Aspen Pinion Serving Kitchen handwashing station and verbalized disposable hand towels should always be available at the handwashing stations.The facility policy titled, Policy and Procedure Manual - Hand Washing, dated 2021, documented handwashing facilities would be readily accessible and equipped with hot and cold running water, paper towels and/or automatic hand dryer,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the outside garbage receptacle area was kept free from debris. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the harborage and feeding of pests. Findings include:On 03/30/2026 at 8:56 AM, the outside garbage receptacle area had an accumulation of leaf debris, gloves for medical care, and cardboard boxes to the rear and right sides of the receptacle.The Culinary Director (CD) was present and verbalized the receptacle area was managed by facility maintenance; however, all staff were responsible for ensuring the receptacle area was kept clean and free of debris. The CD confirmed the condition of the garbage receptacle area.On 04/02/2026 at 12:09 PM, the Plant Operations Director (maintenance) explained all staff were responsible for ensuring the receptacle area remained clean and free of debris. The Plant Operations Director verbalized the importance of keeping the receptacle area clean was to prevent rodents in the facility.The facility policy titled, Policy and Procedure Manual - Waste…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a dishwasher machine in 1 of 3 satellite pantries was maintained in good working order to keep dishes, utensils, and other cooking equipment properly sanitized. This deficient practice had the potential to expose residents to foodborne illnesses. Findings include:On 03/30/2026 at 10:29 AM, during a tour of the Reflections satellite pantry, the Culinary Director (CD) started a cycle on the dishwasher. A colorless transparent liquid seeped out from underneath the dishwasher into a puddle in front of the dishwasher. At the end of the cycle, the CD wiped a chlorine test strip on the door of the dishwasher. The test strip lacked a change of color. The CD wiped another chlorine test strip on the dishwasher door. The chlorine test strip did not change color. The CD started a second cycle on the dishwasher. At the end of the cycle, the CD used three chlorine test strips: one on the dishwasher door, one on the dish rack, and one in the water pooling at the bottom of the dishwasher. The test strips did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was maintained as evidenced by the presence of live ants in 1 of 6 serving kitchens in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to contribute to ants and other pest infestations, contaminate food preparation areas, and increase the risk of foodborne illness. Findings include:On 03/30/2026 at 10:40 AM, during a tour of the facility's serving kitchens and in the presence of the Culinary Director, several ants were present on the floor of the Pyramid [NAME] Unit serving kitchen near the door to the satellite pantry and around the garbage bin.The Culinary Director confirmed the observation and explained being aware of ants present in the facility approximately one year prior; however, the Culinary Director believed the problem had been resolved. The Culinary Director verbalized when ants were identified, the Culinary Director would set out bait traps and disinfect the area to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, personnel record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure elder abuse prevention training was completed timely per facility policy for 6 of 20 sampled employees (Employees #2, #3, #4, #15, #17, and #19). This deficient practice had the potential to place all residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings include:Employee #2Employee #2 was hired as the Director of Nursing on 02/09/2026.Employee #2's personnel record documented initial abuse training completed on 02/15/2026, six days after hire.Employee #3Employee #3 was hired as the Activity Director on 05/13/2025.Employee #3's personnel record documented initial abuse training completed on 08/07/2025, nearly three months after hire.Employee #4Employee #4 was hired as the Registered Dietician on 07/13/2025.Employee #4's personnel record lacked documented evidence that initial abuse training was completed.Employee #15Employee #15 was hired as a Licensed Practical Nurse on 06/24/2025.Employee #15's personnel record documented initial abuse training completed on 07/22/2025, almost one month after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure initial elder abuse prevention training was completed timely for 10 of 20 sampled employees (Employees #1, #5, #11, #12, #14, #15, #16, #18, #19, and #20). This deficient practice had the potential to place all residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings include: Employee #1 Employee #1 was hired by the facility as the Executive Director with a start date of 09/03/2024. Employee #1's personnel file lacked documented evidence of elder abuse prevention training. Employee #5 Employee #5 was hired by the facility as the Social Services Director with a start date of 01/07/2025. Employee #5's personnel file documented elder abuse prevention training on 03/11/2025, 4 weeks late. Employee #11 Employee #11 was hired by the facility as an Agency Registered Nurse (RN) with a start date on 08/01/2024 and as a facility Registered Nurse with a start date on 01/28/2025. Employee #11's personnel file documented elder abuse training on 02/23/2025, six months late. Employee #12 Employee #12 was hired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to choose to not be approached by individuals providing pet therapy when the resident had a documented allergy to animal hair and a care plan addressing the resident's desire to not be asked about receiving pet therapy was respected for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #16). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident feeling disrespected due to the resident's requests not being honored in the facility. Findings include: Resident #16 Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, unspecified, major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified, and post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic. On 03/10/2025 at 1:27 PM, Resident #16 was sitting on the side of the resident's bed when a handler and a therapy dog stood at the doorway to the resident's room and asked Resident #16 if the resident would like a visit from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to protect a resident from neglect after a fall in the facility for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #60). This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for changes in condition to go unnoticed by staff and a delay in transfer to the hospital. Findings include: Resident #60 Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, and alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia. A Progress Note dated 11/20/2024 at 4:30 PM, documented Resident #60 was found by a nurse on the floor, face down in the resident's room. The resident had no signs or symptoms of head injury, equal hand grips and denied pain. The resident had frequent falls. The resident was assisted to the shower and a skin assessment was performed. The resident had a large red scrape to the right chest, a skin tear on the lower right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect and a fall resulting in serious bodily injury was reported to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #60). This deficient practice had the potential for allegations of neglect to not be investigated by the facility and/or the SA. Findings include: Resident #60 Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, and alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia. A Progress Note dated 11/20/2024 at 4:30 PM, documented Resident #60 was found by a nurse on the floor, face down in the resident's room. The resident had no signs or symptoms of head injury, equal hand grips and denied pain. The resident had frequent falls. The resident was assisted to the shower and a skin assessment was performed. The resident had a large red scrape to the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #60). This deficient practice had the potential for physical and/or emotional harm to residents due to allegations of neglect not being investigated and protections put in place to prevent future neglect. Findings include: Resident #60 Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, and alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia. A Progress Note dated 11/20/2024 at 4:30 PM, documented Resident #60 was found by a nurse on the floor, face down in the resident's room. The resident had no signs or symptoms of head injury, equal hand grips and denied pain. The resident had frequent falls. The resident was assisted to the shower and a skin assessment was performed. The resident had a large red…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure nurses performed the job duties as outlined in the State Board of Nursing Nurse Practice Act with safe medication administration when 1) qualified Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) and Registered Nurses failed to verify the appropriateness of a medication order for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #69) and 2) eye drops were administered with incorrect technique for 1 of 4 residents observed during medication administration (Resident #72). The deficient practice resulted in a physician order being inaccurately transcribed onto a resident's electronic health record (EMR) and medication administration record (MAR), as well as the misadministration of ordered medication. Findings include: Resident #69 Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of heart failure, unspecified. Resident #69's January, February, and March 2025 MARs documented Spironolactone oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff maintained current Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certification for 2 of 11 sampled direct care employees (Employee #11 and #12). This deficient practice could result in a negative outcome for a resident requiring CPR while awaiting the arrival of emergency medical personnel. Findings include: Employee #11 Employee #11 was hired by the facility as a Registered Nurse (RN) with a start date of [DATE]. The RN's personnel record lacked documented evidence of CPR training and certification. Employee #12 Employee #12 was hired by the facility as an RN/Infection Preventionist with a start date of [DATE]. The RN's personnel record documented CPR training and certification expired on 01/2025. The RNs' Job Description documented the minimum job requirements included CPR certified. On [DATE] at 1:17 PM, the Human Resources Director verbalized CPR certification was required of all direct care staff and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received individualized activities to meet the resident's interests and need to have assistance with the use of electronic devices for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #74). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a resident feeling isolated and frustrated from lack of social interaction and opportunities to pursue personalized interests. Findings include: Resident #74 Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic and major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate On 03/10/2025 at 11:31 AM, Resident #74 verbalized the resident did not enjoy participating in group activities but the resident felt very depressed and would have liked for someone to visit the resident in the resident's room when the resident wanted someone to talk to. The resident verbalized the resident wanted help with learning how to use a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart containing resident medications was secure and expired medications were removed from the active supply in 1 of 3 medication storage rooms and 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The deficient practice could have facilitated unauthorized access to medications in the carts and had the potential for expired medications to be administered to residents. Findings include: On 03/11/2025 at 8:42 AM, a medication cart was left unlocked in the Tahoe/Truckee unit the with five residents sitting in the same area as the cart. On 03/11/2025 at 8:44 AM, a Registered Nurse (RN) returned to the unsecured medication cart and confirmed the cart was left unlocked. The RN confirmed there were five residents near the unsecured medication cart and could have accessed resident medications. The facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage, revised 11/2024, documented the community must store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments. All medications would be stored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure culinary staff checked the holding temperatures for all hot foods to ensure the foods were at a safe temperature prior to beginning meal service from a satellite kitchen to residents in the [NAME]/Quail dining room during a lunch service with the potential to affect 15 of 15 residents residing on the unit and to ensure vegetables prepared for residents requiring a minced and moist diet in the Aspen/Pinion dining room were at a safe temperature prior to beginning lunch service with the potential to affect 1 of 15 residents residing on the unit. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food not held at appropriate temperatures resulting in the growth of pathogens that cause foodborne illness being served to residents. Findings include: [NAME]/Quail On 03/12/2025 at 11:57 AM, a Culinary Staff member entered the satellite serving kitchen to serve lunch to the 15 residents located in the [NAME]/Quail neighborhood of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an electronic medical record (EMR) accurately reflected a resident's code status for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #52) and physician orders were transcribed accurately into the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and EMR to prevent medication errors for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #69). This deficient practice had the potential for a resident's preference related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to not be followed and to result in a significant medication error and compromised resident safety. Findings include: Resident #52 Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, mild, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. On [DATE] at 9:13 AM, Resident #52's EMR documented the resident was to receive full treatment CPR. A Physician's Order dated [DATE], documented physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered timely pneumonia vaccines to complete the recommended pneumonia vaccine schedule for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents #21 and #22). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a resident contracting a preventable illness. Findings include: Resident #21 Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, and heart failure, unspecified. The clinical record for Resident #21 did not include documentation of the resident receiving or being offered a pneumonia vaccine. On 03/13/2025 at 8:53 AM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) confirmed the clinical record for Resident #21 lacked documentation of a pneumonia vaccine being offered or administered to the resident. The IP verbalized the consent for vaccinations was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided education on the risks and benefits of COVID-19 vaccination and a resident was offered the COVID-19 vaccine for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #21 and #22). This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents and their representatives not being given the opportunity to make informed decisions before accepting or declining vaccination and a resident not given the opportunity to accept the vaccine and potentially prevent severe illness and hospitalization from infection with COVID-19. Findings include: Resident #21 Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, and heart failure, unspecified. The clinical record for Resident #21 did not include documentation of the resident receiving or being offered a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident was not verbally abused by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) when the CNA used profane language towards a resident for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #2). Findings include: Resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic, major depressive disorder, single episode specified, and generalized anxiety disorder. An initial Facility Reported Incident (FRI) documented on the evening of 09/11/2024, Resident #2 reported the resident had been called a profanity by a CNA while in the resident's room. An investigation for verbal abuse was initiated. Resident #2 did not want the CNA to provide any further care to the resident. A final FRI documented the CNA was assigned to Resident #2's unit and had provided care to the resident that evening. The investigation was substantiated by the facility for employee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to 1) submit a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) initial report with accurate and complete information, and 2) submit a final report to the State Agency (SA) within the required five-day timeframe for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings include: Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, vascular dementia, moderate with other behavioral disturbance, and anxiety disorder. On 09/06/2024, an initial FRI was submitted to the State agency for employee to resident verbal abuse towards Resident #1 during medication administration in the resident's room. The initial FRI was completed by the Administrator and documented the incident occurred on 08/27/2024. A final FRI was not received by the SA. On 11/06/2024 at 2:51 PM, the Regional Director of Quality and Clinical Services (RDQ) confirmed the previous facility Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the secured memory care unit did not contain potentially harmful and hazardous substances and materials for vulnerable, cognitively impaired residents for 22 of 32 residents residing in the secured unit (Residents #88, #31, #43, #22, #12, #82, #37, #52, #26, #81, #64, #40, #246, #4, #2, #5, #15, #45, #54, #63, #66, and #92). The deficient practice could result in vulnerable residents ingesting harmful and hazardous substances and materials with the potential for adverse health outcomes and hospitalization. Findings include: Resident #88 Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, moderate, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) for Resident #88, dated 09/25/2023, documented the resident had a score of four indicating severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, observation, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained when maintenance staff opened a resident's closed bedroom door and entered without knocking or asking permission to enter for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #60). Findings include: Resident #60 Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, bipolar disorder, unspecified, and post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic. On 04/15/2024 at 9:50 AM, Resident #60 explained facility staff did not always wait for a reply when knocking on the resident's bedroom door. The resident explained the resident would not want someone to enter the room without permission because sometimes the resident emptied their own catheter device or was in the bathroom and would not be fully dressed at the time. On 04/15/2024 at 9:56 AM, a maintenance worker opened the resident's bedroom door and walked into the resident's room without knocking or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's abuse policy was implemented to investigate and report a resident's injury of unknown origin for potential abuse (Resident #4) and the policy included the required time frames for investigation and reporting of potential abuse. The deficient practice could result in resident's injuries of unknown origin to continue without investigation resulting in the potential for resident harm. Findings include: Resident #4 Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, unspecified and dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, severe, with agitation. On 04/16/2024 at 11:56 AM, a Representative for Resident #4 verbalized the resident was found with a large wound to the resident's lower leg on 02/26/2024. The Representative verbalized the facility had informed the Representative the facility was unsure of the cause of the wound. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's injury of unknown origin was reported to the State Agency (Resident #4). The deficient practice could allow injuries of unknown origin to not be investigated for potential abuse to occur and not be reported to the State Agency (SA) and/or Law Enforcement. Findings include: Resident #4 Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, unspecified and dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, severe, with agitation. On 04/16/2024 at 11:56 AM, a Representative for Resident #4 verbalized the resident was found with a large wound to the resident's lower leg on 02/26/2024. The Representative verbalized the facility had informed the representative the facility was unsure of the cause of the wound. The resident had been sent to the emergency department for profuse bleeding for the wound and required stitches to close the wound and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed to address the care and interventions for oxygen therapy for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #295). The deficient practice could result in a negative outcome for the resident if staff were not aware of the resident's chronic oxygen status. Findings include: Resident #295 Resident #295 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified, presence of other heart-valve replacement, and nonrheumatic aortic (valve) stenosis. Resident #295's baseline care plan dated 04/12/2024, lacked a care plan for the care and intervention for oxygen therapy. A Nursing Note, dated 4/12/2024 at 12:16 PM, documented the Nurse called the hospital to gather report on the resident. The resident had a history of hypertension, COPD, and hyperlipidemia, and was at baseline on 3 liter per minute (lpm) of oxygen via nasal cannula. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plan was updated to include the care and interventions for oxygen therapy for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #145) and the care plan interventions were appropriate for 3 of 32 residents residing in the specialized care unit (memory care) (Residents #9, #56, and #67). Findings include: Resident #145 Resident #145 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, unspecified atrial fibrillation, and morbid obesity due to excess calories. Resident #145's Care Plan dated 03/20/24, documented Resident #145 had altered cardiovascular status related to chronic heart failure, with interventions to include oxygen therapy via nasal cannula at two liters per minute (lpm). A physician's order dated 03/20/24, documented to administer oxygen via nasal cannula at 1-3 lpm, may titrate to maintain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of medication administration for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #71). Findings include: Resident #71 Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, moderate, with anxiety. A Physician's Order for Resident #71, dated 02/14/2024, documented Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release 25 milligrams (mg), give 1.5 tablets by mouth one time a day. On 04/15/2024 at 11:02 AM, a pill was located on Resident #71's side table. On 04/15/2024 at 11:03 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)/ Registered Nurse (RN) verbalized when medication was administered the nurse administering the medication was expected to stay with the resident until the medication was swallowed. On 04/15/2024 at 11:05 AM, the ADON confirmed a pill was located at Resident #71's bedside. The ADON looked up the medication and confirmed the medication was Metoprolol and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were trained and certified to perform Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in the event of a resident cardiac arrest for 1 of 4 sampled licensed nurses (Employee #15). The deficient practice could result in a negative outcome for a resident in cardiac arrest while awaiting the arrival of emergency medical personnel. Findings include: Employee #15 Employee #15 was hired as a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) with a start date of [DATE]. The LPN's personnel record lacked documented evidence of CPR training and certification. On [DATE] at 2:30 PM, the Human Resources Director verbalized CPR was required to be taken by all licensed nurses upon hire and confirmed Employee #15 did not have current CPR certification. The facility policy titled Quality of Life: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), last reviewed [DATE], documented all licensed nursing staff would maintain a current CPR certification.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication orders were coordinated with the contracted hospice agency providing the resident with end-of-life care for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #26). The deficient practice could result in Resident #26 not receiving the correct medications for managing symptoms of the resident's terminal diagnosis. Findings include: Resident #26 Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, unspecified, unspecified cirrhosis of liver, and other chronic pain. An order for Resident #26 dated 02/22/2024, documented admit to hospice services related to Alzheimer's disease and cerebral atherosclerosis. The Order Summary Report (facility orders) and the Client Medication Report (CMR), dated 03/27/2024, from the contracted hospice agency and located in the hospice binder documented the following discrepancies: - The facility orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to obtain and/or follow a physician's order for respiratory care for 2 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #145 and #295). Findings include: Resident #145 Resident #145 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, unspecified atrial fibrillation, and morbid obesity due to excess calories. On 04/16/2024 at 11:15 AM, Resident #145 was lying in bed with oxygen being administered via nasal cannula. The oxygen was set to 4 liters per minute (lpm). On 04/17/2024 at 11:28 AM, Resident #145 was in a wheelchair with oxygen being administered via nasal cannula. The oxygen was set to 4.5 lpm. A physician's order dated 03/20/2024, documented administer oxygen at 1-3 lpm via nasal cannula continuously, may titrate to maintain saturations greater than 90 percent, every shift. On 04/17/2024 at 11:46 AM, the Registered Nurse 1 (RN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure Monthly Medication Reviews (MMR) were completed monthly for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #66 and #51). Findings include: Resident #66 Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, moderate, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Resident #66 lacked an MMR completed within thirty (30) days of the prior MMR for August 2023. The July 2023 review was completed 07/24/2023 and the August 2023 review was completed 09/01/2023. On 04/18/2024 at 2:19 PM, the Pharmacist verbalized the MMR should be completed monthly. The Pharmacist confirmed Resident #66's MMR for August was completed on 09/01/2023.Resident #51 Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses including adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review the facility failed to ensure medication was administered with an error rate of less than 5 percent (%). There were 25 opportunities and two medication errors. The medication error rate was 8%. Findings include: Resident #43 Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety and adult failure to thrive. On 04/16/2024 at 8:30 AM, a Registered Nurse 1 (RN) was administering medications to Resident #43. The RN1 was preparing to apply a lidocaine patch to the resident's lower back. RN1 found the resident already had a patch on the resident's lower back. The RN1 removed the patch and applied the new lidocaine patch above the area where the previous patch had been removed. The April 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) and medication orders for Resident #43 documented the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an employee wore the appropriate hair restraints when working in the kitchen and hand hygeine was performed before and after resident contact during a lunch service. The deficient practice could impact the sanitary conditions of the working area for preparing resident food and meals and the potential to cause the spread of communicable disease to residents in the facility. Findings include: On 04/17/2024 at 12:05 PM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered the kitchen area on the Quail/[NAME] neighborhood to retrieve a beverage container from the refrigerator. The CNA lacked a hair restraint covering the CNA's full beard. On 04/17/2024 at 12:14 PM, the Dietary Services Director (DSD) verbalized staff should wear a hair restraint at all times when working in the kitchen. The facility policy titled Food Safety and Sanitation, last revised 05/2013, documented hair restraints are required and should cover all hair on the head. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to identify the lack of timely training (see Tag F678, F943, and F949). Findings include: On 04/18/2024 at 2:29 PM, the Administrator verbalized the QAA Committee had not identified concerns with timeliness of trainings. The Administrator explained the online training system tracked trainings and would allow for trainings to be completed by the end of the month the training the was due, allowing for the trainings to be completed late. The Administrator verbalized training was due upon hire and annually thereafter. The Administrator confirmed trainings were being completed by the online training company standards and not by the regulatory standards. The facility policy titled QAPI Plan, dated 2024, documented the facility used quality assurance and performance improvement to make decisions and guide their day-to-day operations. The Quality Assurance and Improvement (QAPI) Plan focused on systems and processes, rather than individuals. The emphasis was on identifying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the rubber seal on an insulin pen was disinfected with alcohol prior to inserting a needle, COVID-19 testing was performed in an appropriate area, and a used COVID-19 test was not left in a resident area. The deficient practices have the potential to cause the spread of communicable disease to residents in the facility. Findings include: Safe Injection Practices Resident #39 Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic peripheral angiopathy without gangrene and type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified. On 04/17/2024 at 7:51 AM, an Registered Nurse1 (RN) began preparing an Insulin Glargine (Lantus) pen for Resident #39. The RN1 removed the cap from the insulin pen and screwed a needle onto the pen without first wiping the pen tip (rubber seal) with an alcohol swab. The RN1 explained the RN1 did not swab the pen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure elder abuse prevention training was completed timely for 3 of 20 sampled employees (Employee #4, #7, and #9). Findings include: The Facility assessment dated [DATE], documented all staff would go through the initial general orientation upon hire. All training would be in accordance with state and federal guidelines. Employee #4 Employee #4 was hired as the Registered Dietitian with a start date of 04/21/2022. Employee #4's personnel record documented abuse prevention training dated 05/22/2023, one month past the employee's anniversary date. Employee #7 Employee #7 was hired as a Certified Nursing Assistant with a start date of 04/10/2023. Employee #7's personnel record documented an abuse prevention training dated 04/10/2023. The employee's file lacked documented evidence of abuse training for 2024, prior to the anniversary date of the training. Employee #9 Employee #9 was hired as a Registered Nurse with a start date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolatedProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure annual behavioral health training was completed for 6 of 20 sampled employees (Employee #1, #2, #3, #7, #9, and #12). Findings include: The Facility assessment dated [DATE], documented all staff would go through the initial general orientation upon hire. All training would be in accordance with state and federal guidelines. The following employees lacked documented evidence of behavioral health training for 2024: - Employee #1 was hired as the Administrator with a start date of 01/03/2022. Employee #1's personnel file documented dementia training dated 04/16/2023. - Employee #2 was hired as the Director of Nursing with a start date of 01/10/2022. Employee #2's personnel file documented dementia training dated 04/16/2023. - Employee #3 was hired as the Recreation Director with a start date of 01/07/2020. Employee #3's personnel file documented dementia training dated 04/16/2023. - Employee #7 was hired as a Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-28 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure required documentation was entered into the clinical record by a physician when residents were transferred to another facility for 5 of 5 sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5). Findings include: Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, unspecified and anxiety disorder, unspecified. A Physician Discharge Summary signed by the Physician on 10/23/23, documented the resident's name, date of birth , admission date, discharge date , disposition, admission diagnoses, attending physician's name, and Summary of Care / Reason for Transfer. The section titled Summary of Care / Reason for Transfer documented Resident #1 was transported to inpatient behavioral health. Resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including other seizures and acute on chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a Comprehensive Care Plan was updated to include a care plan related to constipation and abdominal distention for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #4) Findings include: Resident #4 Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including abdominal distention (gaseous), constipation, unspecified, and other chronic pain. Resident #4's Comprehensive Care Plan did not include a care plan related to constipation and/or abdominal distention. On 12/28/23 at 2:49 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verbalized the expectation was when a resident had a diagnosis of constipation and/or abdominal distention, a care plan would be created to ensure the resident did not have future complications. The DON confirmed Resident #4's Comprehensive Care Plan did not include a care plan related to constipation and abdominal distention. The DON confirmed the purpose of the care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure quality of care was provided for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #4) by failing to ensure a resident with ongoing abdominal distention and pain received the care and treatment necessary to identify and treat a bowel obstruction. Findings include: Resident #4 Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including abdominal distention (gaseous), constipation, unspecified, and other chronic pain. A nurse progress note dated [DATE], documented Resident #4 had not had a bowel movement (BM) for three days and Milk of Magnesia was administered to the resident. A nurse progress note dated [DATE], documented Resident #4's abdomen was bloated, and the resident complained of discomfort with palpation. An order for simethicone, a medication used to relieve gas, was received. A nurse progress note dated [DATE], documented Resident #4 had not had a BM for three days. Milk of Magnesia was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-28 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for an x-ray and a physician's order to transfer a resident to an acute care emergency room were entered into the residents clinical record and signed by the physician for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #4). Findings include: Resident #4 Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including abdominal distention (gaseous), constipation, unspecified, and other chronic pain. A nurse progress note dated 12/16/23, documented Resident #4 had a distended abdomen for three days, the resident was given simethicone to treat the distention but remained distended. Resident #4 had hypoactive bowel sounds in all four quadrants and complained of discomfort with abdominal palpation. Resident #4 had been eating less than the resident's usual baseline. The nurse notified the physician and received orders for a kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) x-ray. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not verbally abused by an employee for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #6). Findings include: Resident #6 Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including polyneuropathy, anxiety disorder, and muscle wasting. Resident #6 was discharged on 09/12/23. A Performance Documentation form dated 09/08/23, documented Resident #6 reported poor customer service when discussing end of benefits. Resident #6 reported the Business Office Manager told Resident #6 You're taking a bed away from a Veteran who needs it. Resident #6 expressed having felt sad by the statement made by the Business Office Manager. The clinical records for Resident #6 lacked documentation of the incident. On 10/12/23 at 2:07 PM, the Social Worker Director (SWD) verbalized if there was an allegation of employee to resident verbal abuse, the supervisor of the staff in question would be notified and an in-service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) was completed and submitted to the state agency for an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #6) and for an allegation of exploitation for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings include: Resident #6 Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including polyneuropathy, anxiety disorder, and muscle wasting. Resident #6 was discharged on 09/12/23. A Performance Documentation form dated 09/08/23, documented Resident #6 reported poor customer service when discussing end of benefits. Resident #6 reported the Business Office Manager told Resident #6 You're taking a bed away from a Veteran who needs it. Resident #6 expressed having felt sad by the statement made by the Business Office Manager. On 10/12/23 at 2:25 PM, the Business Office Manager verbalized employee to resident abuse was to be documented within and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained when a resident fell in the shower and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) disregarded the fall as a purposeful behavior and laughed at the resident for 1 of 15 Facility Reported Incident (FRI) residents (Resident #1). Findings include: Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (CVA), vascular dementia, moderate, with mood disturbance, and pain disorder with related psychological factors. On 06/01/23 at 3:02 PM, Resident #1 verbalized the resident slipped and fell off a shower chair during a shower. The resident explained the resident had placed the resident's buttocks on the edge of the shower chair and slipped off the chair to the ground while washing self. The resident recalled the CNA laughed and told the resident to get up. The CNA told the resident to get up using the hand rails in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident physical abuse for 3 of 15 Facility Reported Incident (FRI) residents (Resident #3, #4, and #5). Findings include: Facility Reported Incident (FRI) #NV00068418 documented on 04/19/23, Resident #2 approached Resident #3 and hit Resident #3 on the cheek. An Abuse/Neglect Allegation Investigation Witness Interview Note dated 04/20/23, documented a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) witnessed the incident. The LPN stated Resident #3 was yelling and Resident #2 was getting agitated. Resident #2 hit Resident #3 on the cheek with the back of the hand. Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including vascular dementia, severe, with agitation, mood disturbance, anxiety, and psychotic disturbance and post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic. A Progress Note dated 04/19/23, documented Resident #3 was hit on the cheek by another resident when the other resident was agitated.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure post fall protocol was followed and supervision was provided when a resident fell for 1 of 15 Facility Reported Incident (FRI) residents (Resident #1). Findings include: Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (CVA), vascular dementia, moderate, with mood disturbance, and pain disorder with related psychological factors. On 06/01/23 at 3:02 PM, Resident #1 verbalized the resident slipped and fell off a shower chair during a shower. The resident explained the resident had placed the resident's buttocks on the edge of the shower chair and slipped off the chair to the ground while washing self. On 06/01/23 at 3:23 PM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) verbalized on 05/18/23, Resident #1 reported to the LPN the resident had fallen in the shower in the evening on 05/17/23. The LPN explained the Registered Nurse (RN) had mentioned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-04-02 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain staffing hour postings for at least 18 months as required by federal regulation. This deficient practice had the potential to impede the facility's ability to demonstrate compliance with staffing requirements and hinders transparency for regulatory review. Findings include:On 03/31/2026, during record review, the surveyor requested staffing hour postings from 07/2025 - 09/2025. On 03/31/2026 at 11:10 AM, the Administrator verbalized the Staff Scheduler was not retaining the staffing hour postings. The Administrator confirmed staff postings were to be retained for 18 months. The Administrator verbalized being unaware the Staff Scheduler was discarding the staffing hour postings at the end of every week. The Administrator explained an in-service was provided to the Staff Scheduler for the required retention time of the staffing hour postings on 03/31/2026.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-03-13 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure current nursing hours were posted for 6 of 6 units in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a lack of awareness for residents and visitors regarding the number of nursing and direct care staff on duty. Findings include: On 03/10/2025 at 7:23 AM, the nursing staff postings in the facility were dated 03/07/2025. On 03/10/2025 at 8:42 AM, the Staffing Coordinator verbalized the Staffing Coordinator was responsible to post the direct care staff posting daily Monday through Friday. On 03/10/2025 at 8:45 AM, a Registered Nurse (RN) verbalized being responsible to post the direct care staff posting on Saturdays and Sundays. The RN confirmed having not posted the direct care staff for 03/08/2025 or 03/09/2025. The Staffing Coordinator and the RN confirmed the nursing staff posting had not been updated since 03/07/2025.
- No harm found · B2024-04-18 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment (FA) was updated to reflect accurate and current staffing needs of the facility's special care unit (memory care). Findings include: The Facility assessment dated 02/2024, documented the staffing plan for direct care staff was 1 staff member to 16 residents. The FA staffing plan did not include staffing levels required for the facility's memory care unit. On 04/17/2024 at 3:16 PM, the Director or Nursing verbalized the staffing ratio in the memory care unit was one staff member to eight residents. On 04/18/2024 at 3:24 PM, the Administrator verbalized the FA staffing plans did not address the staffing needs of the memory care unit. The Administrator confirmed the FA staffing plan should indicate all staffing needs, including the staffing needs of the memory care unit. The facility policy titled Facility Assessment, revised on 02/2024, documented the Pyramid/[NAME] household was designated as a special care unit specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HEALTH DIMENSIONS GROUP — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIMENSIONS HEALTH STRATEGIES CORPORATION | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2024 |
| HEALTH DIMENSIONS CONSULTING INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| BRISCOE, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2013 |
| BRISCOE, PATRICIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2024 |
| HENNESSEY, ERIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2024 |
| MAGBOO, MEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/14/2020 |
| ROGOTZKE, AMBER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2024 |
| RUNYAN, LORI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/09/2024 |
| SHVETZOFF, SERGEI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2024 |
| SHVETZOFF, TAMI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2024 |
| STATE OF NEVADA | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/15/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nevada Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295105. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.