Emmanuel Center For Nursing
600 School House Road, Danville, PA 17821 · Non profit - Church related · 90 certified beds · (570) 275-6100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.6% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.0% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.7% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.8% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.7% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.4% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.2% | 68.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.3% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.5% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.12 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.35 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.8%CMS range 38.8–58.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 7.1–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.6–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 75.2 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.71 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-06-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, facility policies, facility-provided investigative documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to protect one of five residents reviewed (Resident 5) from abuse and neglect by not implementing the individualized care plan intervention requiring two staff members for bed mobility assistance, resulting in actual harm in the form of a spiral fracture of the distal left femur. This deficiency is cited as past noncompliance. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation last reviewed by the facility in December 2025, revealed the facility will take appropriate steps to prevent occurrence of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property. All allegations are treated seriously, reported promptly and investigated thoroughly, and addressed with appropriate corrective or disciplinary action based on the findings, severity, circumstances, and regulatory requirements. The policy defines neglect as the failure of the facility, its team members, or service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, review of clinical records, and the census of the designated Hospice Specialty Unit, it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient and appropriately deployed nursing staff to consistently provide timely quality of care, supervision, and services necessary to meet the physical and mental well-being of 10 residents receiving hospice services. Findings include: Review of facility census revealed 10 residents currently receiving Hospice services in the designated Hospice Specialty Unit. The unit was staffed with one LPN (licensed practical nurse) and one nurse aide. Observation of the Hospice Unit on May 7, 2025, at 11:35 AM revealed six residents seated in the common area in wheelchairs and/or specialty chairs. The assigned LPN was stationed at the medication cart. Interview with Employee 1 (LPN) at the time of observation confirmed there was no other staff present as the assigned nurse aide was off unit on a scheduled break. During continued observation, two separate call bell lights were observed activated in resident rooms.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the dietary department and in the 100-Hall and 200-Hall medication room refrigerators. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). A review of the facility policy entitled Sanitation and Infection Control provided by the facility on December 23, 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, resident council meeting minutes, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by two residents out of the 20 residents sampled (Residents 19 and 21) and experiences reported by five out of the six residents during a resident group interview (Residents 5, 12, 19, 21, and 42). Findings include: A review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated October 21, 2024, revealed residents in attendance raised concerns about long wait times for staff to respond and provide care after ringing their call bells for assistance. The residents in attendance indicated that staff will initially respond to their call bell, turn off the bell, but do not provide care. A review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated November 22, 2024, revealed residents in attendance raised concerns that staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-23 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide meal service in an environment that maintains each resident's dignity for three residents out of 6 sampled (Residents 26, 44, and 58), and failed to provide medication in a manner that respected the resident's dignity for one resident out of 20 sampled (Resident 31). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dignity- Quality of Life last reviewed by the facility in August 2024, revealed the facility promotes care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect. A review of Resident 26's clinical record revealed she was severely cognitively impaired. And required total assistance from staff to be fed her meals. An observation conducted on December 21, 2024, at 12:05 PM of the 100-nursing unit dining room revealed Resident 26 and Resident 44 seated together at a table. At 12:06 PM Resident 26's lunch meal was delivered and placed on the table in front of her. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to thoroughly assess, obtain physician orders, and develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan in accordance with standards of practice, for two residents out of 20 sampled residents (Residents 41 and 43). Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient's EHR (electronic health record) to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high-quality care in the continuity of patient care: Assessments Clinical problems Communications with other health care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to restore normal bladder function for one out of 20 residents sampled (Resident 21). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Bowel and Bladder Management, last reviewed by the facility on August 8, 2024, revealed it is the facility's policy to ensure that each resident with bowel or bladder incontinence receives appropriate treatment and services to achieve or maintain as much normal elimination function as possible. The policy indicates residents deemed appropriate will have an individualized toilet schedule or bladder training program. Residents' comprehensive, individualized, person-centered care plan will be updated or revised to include the resident's bowel and bladder needs, goals, and personal preferences. A clinical record review revealed Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy, observation, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide respiratory care and supplemental oxygen, as ordered by the physician for one resident out of 20 sampled. (Resident 2) Additionally, the facility failed to store respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner for one resident out of three sampled receiving oxygen therapy (Resident 41). Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy last reviewed by the facility in August 2024, revealed the E-tanks (oxygen cylinders which contain oxygen under pressure) are used to allow residents to be mobile in the facility and participate in therapy, activities, and meals. The licensed nursing staff will monitor oxygen delivery systems hourly. E-tanks will be changed when they are approximately ¼ full (at the top of the red areas on the gauge). Tanks and concentrators are checked hourly and initialed on the checklist when in use. During an initial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary antibiotic drugs for one out of 20 residents sampled (Resident 19). Findings included: A clinical record review revealed Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included disease of the spinal cord, unspecified (damage to the spinal cord that is not otherwise specified). Further clinical record review revealed Resident 19 had physician orders for a Foley catheter, 16 French, with a 30 ml balloon (a type of indwelling urinary catheter, rubber tube inserted into bladder to drain urine) related to neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. A clinical record review revealed no documented evidence the resident had experienced any symptoms of a urinary tract infection, such as fever, chills, mental changes/confusion, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pressure in the lower part of the pelvis, or an increase in urination from October 1, 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to demonstrate coordination of services in the development of the comprehensive plan of care between the facility and a Hospice agency for two residents out of three sampled residents receiving hospice care (Resident 34 and 47). Findings include: Review of Resident 34's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included end stage dementia (very severe cognitive decline and affects individuals by declines in mobility, increased incontinence, increased infection, trouble swallowing/eating, and severe confusion with increased anxiety) with need for hospice care/services (care designed to give supportive care to people in the final phase of a terminal illness and focus on comfort and quality of life, rather than cure with goals to enable patients to be comfortable and free of pain) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 34's comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that staff followed proper infection control techniques while passing medications to one of three residents (Residents 38) on the 200 Hall nursing unit. Findings included: An observation on December 22, 2024 at 9:13 AM revealed Employee 1 LPN (licensed practical nurse) was administering morning medications to Resident 38 on the 200 Hall nursing unit. Employee 1 was opened a bottle of calcium tablets and the employee used her bare hand without performing hand hygeine to block the pills from coming out of the bottle, touching the pills, and then picked up the the calcium pill with her ungloved hand and without performing hand hygiene or donning gloves, placed it in Resident 38's medication cup. Further observation revealed the employee knocked over the medication cup where two pills had spilled out on to the medication cart. The employee did not dispose of those pills but picked them up off the medication cart, with ungloved hand and without performing hand hygiene or donning gloves, and placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department and one of two resident pantries. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). During the initial tour of the food and nutrition services department with the foodservice director (FSD) conducted on January 9,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner respectful of each resident's dignity for one resident (Resident 1), and failed to provide care in a manner and environment that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' request for assistance as reported by two residents out of 11 sampled (Residents 12 and 11). Findings include: A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which have included malignant neoplasm of the prostate, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, COVID-19, bronchopneumonia, and clostridium difficile [C-diff] (a bacterium infection that causes an infection of the colon). A review of a nurses progress note dated February 11, 2024, at 1:19 AM, revealed that the resident was positive for C - diff, and was placed on contact precautions, and began treatment, Vancomycin (antibiotic).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policy and minutes from Resident Council meetings and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to put forth sufficient efforts to promptly resolve continued resident complaints/grievances expressed during Resident Council Meetings including those voiced by five of five residents attending a resident group meeting (Residents 29, 46, 26, 49, and 16) Findings include: Review of the facility's current Grievance policy provided during the survey ending January 11, 2024, indicated that it is the facility's policy to provide an opportunity for residents to express concerns at any time. The facility's goal is to resolve resident and family concerns in a timely basis. Review of the minutes from the Resident Council meetings held between October 2023 through December 2023, revealed that residents in attendance at these resident group meetings voiced their concerns regarding facility services during the meetings. During the October 2023 Resident Council meeting the residents in attendance relayed concerns with staff responding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy and employee personnel files and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their established procedures for screening four of five employees for employment (Employee 1, 2, 3, and 4) Findings include: A review of the facility's Resident Abuse policy last reviewed March 16, 2023, revealed procedures for screening potential employees that included obtaining references from current/previous employers. Review of employee personnel files revealed that Employee 1 (Activity aide) was hired October 9, 2023. The employee's application indicated that she had previous employers. There was no indication that the facility obtained any references for this employee's previous employers. Review of employee personnel files revealed that Employee 2 (dietary aide) was hired September 19, 2023. The employee's application indicated that she had previous employers. There was no indication that the facility obtained any references from the prior employers. Review of employee personnel files revealed that Employee 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and resident incident/accident reports, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary staff supervision to monitor a resident's whereabouts to prevent an elopement from the facility for two residents (Resident 25 and 73) out of 18 reviewed. Findings included: Review of clinical record of Resident 25 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including anxiety and depression. A review of an Elopement Risk assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was considered at high risk for elopement and a wanderguard bracelet was applied. A review of Resident 25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated September 28, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact. A review of a nursing progress note dated September 27, 2023, revealed that At around 13:25 (1:25 PM) {Resident 25} was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and pharmacy recommendations and staff interview it was determined that the pharmacist failed to identify irregularities in the drug regimen of one resident (Resident 57) out of 18 residents reviewed. Findings include: A review of Resident 57's, clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change). A review of the resident's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated May 16, 2023, for Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 25 mg by mouth at bedtime for altered mental status. Review of a consultant pharmacist drug regimen reviews conducted from May 2023 to January 2024 revealed that the pharmacist failed to identify the lack of a clinically supportable diagnosis for Resident 57's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from unnecessary psychoactive medications by failing to attempt a gradual dose reduction, failing to ensure the presence of documented clinical rationale for the continued use of psychotropic medication and failing to monitor for potential adverse consequences of psychoactive drug use for two residents of 18 residents reviewed. (Resident 57 and 51) Findings include: A review of Resident 57's, clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change). The resident was transferred to the hospital on May 8, 2023, for a change in mental status and returned to the facility on May 16, 2023, after being treated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, test tray results, resident and staff interviews, and test tray results it was determined that the facility failed to serve meals at safe and palatable temperatures. Findings include: According to the federal regulatory guidance at 483.60(i)-(2) Food safety requirements - the definition of Danger Zone, found under the Definitions section, is food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit that allow rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. During an interview on January 9, 2024, at 10:47 AM, Resident 12 stated that the food served was rarely ever hot, and she will often send it back to be reheated. She mentioned that she likes vegetables but could never eat them due to being mushy or not cooked. During an interview on January 9, 2024, at 11:00 AM, Resident 29 stated that the food has gone downhill and always comes out cold. She mentioned that she spoke with dietary staff related to a steam table and has voiced concerns during resident council meetings about the temperature of the food. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policy and the minutes from Residents' Council meetings, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to routinely offer bedtime snacks to residents as desired. Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Residents Snacks reviewed March 16, 2023, revealed that bedtime snacks will be offered to residents daily. During a group meeting held on January 10, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., with five (5) alert and oriented residents, five of five residents (Residents 29, 46, 26, 49, and 16) stated that they have not received bedtime snacks in a very long time. The residents stated that they have repeatedly brought this particular complaint to the facility staff's attention without resolution to date. During an interview on January 10, 2024, at 2 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing were unable to verify that residents are routinely offered and provided snacks at bedtime as preferred by each resident on nightly basis. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(3)(5) Nursing Services 28 Pa. Code 211.10(a) Resident care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, CDC and Pennsylvania Department of Health guidelines, observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control practices designed to deter spread of RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) infections in the facility. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy entitled Management of Respiratory Syncytial Virus last reviewed by the facility on March 16, 2023, indicated it is the policy of the facility to ensure that proper and appropriate infection control principles are utilized to help decrease the risk of transmission of RSV. RSV is a highly contagious respiratory virus that can affect any age but is greater risk for older adults. It is easily spread through air uninfected respiratory droplets or through direct contact. The use of proper infection control principles can help decrease the risk of transmission of RSV. Further it was indicated the nurse will observe residents for signs and symptoms that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, select facility incident reports, and the facility's abuse prohibition policy and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin to rule out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment as a potential cause of the injury sustained by one resident out of 18 sampled (Resident 19). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, entitled Investigation of Abuse last reviewed by the facility March 16, 2023, indicated that a complete investigation will be conducted. In case of injury of unknown origin, the facility will try to determine the source of the injury and rule out neglect or abuse. When investigating injuries of unknown origin the facility will interview staff and anyone coming in contact with the resident over the course of 24 hours prior to the noted injury. The investigation will include the signed statements of these contact people. Additionally, the facility will identify anyone who provided services to the resident during this 24 hour period and document the specific services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop person-centered comprehensive care plans to meet the current needs and problems of three out of 18 residents sampled (Residents 33, 64, and 22). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease. A review of Resident 33's laboratory results report dated January 2, 2024, revealed that the resident had tested positive for RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus). However, the resident's care plan, in effect at the time of the survey ending January 11, 2024, failed to reflect the resident's diagnosis of RSV and interventions to treat and manage the resident's symptoms. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease with late onset and epileptic seizures. A review of Resident 64's laboratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and clinical records it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to demonstrate that licensed nurses evaluated and recorded the provision of necessary nursing care for a change in condition for one resident out of 18 sampled residents (Resident 39). Findings included: According to the Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, Department of State, Chapter 21 State Board of Nursing Subsection 21.11 (a) The register nurse assesses human responses and plans, implements and evaluates nursing care for individuals or families for whom the nurse is responsible. In carrying out this responsibility, the nurse performs all of following functions: (4) Carries out nursing care actions which promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals (6)(b) The registered nurse is fully responsible for all actions as a licensed nurse and is accountable to clients for the quality of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely provide prescribed respiratory care for one resident reviewed for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 49). Findings include: Resident 49's clinical record revealed an admission date of November 4, 20220 with diagnoses that included asthma, and sleep apnea. Nursing progress notes revealed that the resident told nursing staff on January 7, 2024, that he was experiencing a sore throat, cough, and congestion. A physician's order was obtained for Albuterol Inhalation Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) MG/3ML (Ipratropium-Albuterol) 1 vial inhale orally every 4 hours as needed for shortness of breath. The resident's January 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated that staff administered the above noted breathing treatment to Resident 49 on January 7, 2024, at 4:00 p.m., and January 10, 2024, at 7:00 a.m. During an interview with Resident 49 at approximately 10:30 a.m., on January 10, 2024. Resident 49 stated he had requested a breathing treatment the previous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary behavioral health care in a timely manner to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one of 18 residents sampled (Resident 25). Findings include: Review of clinical record of Resident 25 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including anxiety and depression. A review of Resident 25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated September 28, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of Resident 25's clinical record revealed that the resident exhibited multiple behaviors, including exit seeking and eloping from facility. Resident 25 was noted to display exit seeking behaviors almost daily, throughout the month of September 2023 through end…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to address a resident's dementia-related behavioral symptoms for one out of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 57). Findings include: A review of Resident 57's, clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change). A review of Resident 57's Significant Change Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated December 13, 2023, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of behavior tracking dated from May 2023 to December 2023, revealed that the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary antibiotic drugs for one out of 18 residents sampled (Resident 64). Findings included: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 64 was admitted into the facility on February 24, 2023, and has diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia and chronic kidney failure. A review of nursing progress notes dated January 3, 2024, at 2:30 PM revealed that the resident was observed to have light hematuria (blood in urine) with a foul smell. The resident was unable to verbalize discomfort due to cognitive impairment. A physician order dated January 3, 2024, was noted to obtain a urine analysis and culture and sensitivity (microscopic study of the urine culture performed to determine the presence of pathogenic bacteria in patients with suspected urinary tract infection [UTI]). A review of a laboratory report for a urinalysis dated January 3, 2024, revealed that the results were abnormal with blood, protein,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on residents and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in an environment, which promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' request for assistance as reported by seven residents out of seven interviewed (Residents 24, 28, 32, 42, 43, 47, and 66). Findings include: Interview conducted on January 18, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. five residents attended a group meeting. All five of these residents, Residents 24, 28, 43, 47, and 66, voiced concerns that staff do not answer their call bells timely and meet their needs for assistance in a timely manner. All five residents stated that staff take longer than 30 minutes, and sometimes up to 45 minutes, to respond to their call bells and/or provide requested care. All residents stated that these long waits and delays may occur at any time of day and any shift of nursing duty. The residents stated that they feel the the facility was short staffed and that insufficient nurse staffing was a part of the problem as to why they wait so long for assistance from staff when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and a review of employee personnel records it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the qualified part-time professional activities director responsibilities included directing the development, implementation, supervision and ongoing evaluation of the activities program, which includes the completion and/or directing/delegating the completion of the activities component of the comprehensive assessment; and contributing to and/or directing/delegating the contribution to the comprehensive care plan goals and approaches that are individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident. Findings include: Interview with the administrator on January 17, 2023 at 11:30 AM revealed that the previous full-time qualified activities director resigned on November 19, 2022. The administrator stated that no qualified candidates have applied or been interviewed. The administrator stated that since November 19, 2022, Employee 3 (facility corporation Wellness Director) has had oversight of the activities program at the facility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services planned to maintain the functional abilities of two of seven sampled residents (Residents 34 and 43). Findings include: Review of Resident 34's clinical record indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness and diabetes. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated January 4, 2023, indicated that the resident's cognition was intact and the resident required staff assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, personal hygiene, and toilet use. A physical therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was to receive Restorative Nursing and Active range of motion (AROM) to the right lower extremity (RLE) in all planes at hip, knee and ankle and passive range of motion (PROM) to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to the administration of a narcotic pain medication prescribed on an as needed basis (PRN), failed to effectively manage a resident's consistent and repeated use of an opioid pain medication prescribed as needed (PRN), and had failed to administer pain medication as prescribed by the physician, for one resident out of four reviewed (Resident 23). Findings include: According to US Department of Health and Human Services, Interagency Task Force, Executive Summary report May 6, 2021, for Pain Management Best Practices the development of an effective pain treatment plan after proper evaluation to establish a diagnosis with measurable outcomes that focus on improvements including quality of life (QOL), improved functionality, and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Achieving excellence in acute and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of nurse staffing, the minutes from Resident Council Meetings and clinical records, observations and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide and/or efficiently deploy sufficient nursing staff to consistently provide timely and quality of care to residents, including timely provision of assistance from the dining room back to the residents rooms and monitoring during meal service in the main dining room and timely response to requests for assistance to maintain resident safety and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of residents, including Residents 24, 28, 43, 47, 66, 42 and 32. Findings include: During a group meeting with residents on January 18, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. the five residents in attendance, Residents 24, 28, 43, 47, and 66, all voiced concerns with the long waits for nursing staff to assist them from the dining room back to their rooms after meals. The residents stated that these long waits have been an ongoing problem for them during the last few months and the have discussed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer routine annual dental services for four Medicaid payor sources out of 17 residents sampled (Residents 29, 33, 34 and 42). Findings include: Review of Resident 29's clinical record indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and that the resident's payor source was Medicaid. Review of Resident 33's clinical record indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and that the resident's payor source was Medicaid. Review of Resident 34's clinical record indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and that the resident's payor source was Medicaid. Review of Resident 42's clinical record indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and that the resident's payor source was Medicaid. There was no documented evidence that the above residents were offered or had received dental services in the past year. Interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of two residents out of 17 sampled (Resident 29 and 42). Findings include: A review of the clinical record of Resident 29 revealed a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], noted the resident's ADL assistance as extensive assistance - (resident involved in activity, staff provide weight-bearing support), and a two + persons physical assist. However, the resident was totally dependent, full staff performance every time during entire 7-day period) and a two + persons physical assist. A review of Resident 42's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated in Section N0410 Medications Received that an antibiotic medication was received seven times in the last seven days. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a discharge summary, which included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, the course of illness, corresponding treatment, discharge instructions, and post-discharge care plan for one of three closed records reviewed (Resident 64). Findings include: A review of the clinical record review revealed that Resident 64 was admitted to the on October 4, 2022, with diagnosis to include ventral hernia without obstruction (any protrusion of intestine or other tissue through a weakness or gap in the abdominal wall). The resident was discharged to a personal care home on October 25, 2022. Review of Resident 64's closed clinical record revealed a Discharge Instructions form, which included the resident's diet and reconciliation of the resident's pre-discharge and post-discharge medications. However, at the time of the survey ending January 20, 2023, there was no documented evidence a discharge summary was provided to the resident and personal care home, which included a recapitulation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement planned fall prevention interventions and effective safety measures, including necessary staff supervision of two residents identified at risk for falls with known unsafe behaviors, to prevent falls with serious injuries, femur/hip fractures, for two residents out of four sampled (Resident 215 and Resident 19). Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled Falls and injury prevention program last reviewed by the facility April 1, 2022, revealed that the facility will promote an environment that remains as free of accidents as possible, staffing and programming that emphasizes fall prevention and provide resident with adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. A multi-disciplinary falls committee has been developed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents, and review accidents/incidents and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to address a resident's dementia-related behavioral symptoms for one out of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances (a decline affecting memory, normal thinking, communicating which make it difficult to perform normal activities of daily living such as dressing, eating, and bathing). An admission Minimum Data Set assessment (a federally mandated standardized assessment completed periodically to plan resident care) dated November 22, 2022, indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for decision making and exhibited a behavior of non-intrusive wandering. Review of the resident's care plan initially dated November 18, 2022, indicated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of clinical records and select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure acceptable storage and use by dates for multi-dose medications on one of two medication carts observed (B hall - 100's) and acceptable labeling of IV solutions for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 26). Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Medication Labels and Peripheral IV insertion/infusion/maintenance guidelines, last reviewed by the facility April 1, 2022, indicated some medications must be dated upon opening and should be discarded after the expiration date has passed. When opened the following is a list of medications with their accompanying expiration dates, included in this list is all insulins. A peripheral IV is used for administration of fluids and medication. Inspect all solution containers prior to hanging for discoloration, turbidity, leaks, particulate matter and expiration date. Change IV solution…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely offer and/or provide the pneumococcal immunization to one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident 32). Findings include: Review of the clinical record of Resident 32 revealed admission to the facility on December 7, 2022. The resident was not offered the pneumococcal immunization until surveyor inquiry on January 19, 2023. Interview with the Administrator on January 18, 2023, at approximately 9:30 a.m. confirmed that Resident 32 was not offered the pneumococcal immunization until surveyor inquiry on January 19, 2023. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (a)(c)(d)(5) Nursing services
- No harm found · B2024-12-23 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide residents or their representatives with written information of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital of one resident out of 20 residents sampled (Resident 10). Findings include: A review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on December 5, 2024, and returned to the facility on December 9, 2024. There was no documented evidence the facility provided Resident 10 and/or her representative written information about the facility's bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed-upon rate during a hospitalization) at the time of transfer. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on December 22, 2024, at approximately 1:00 PM confirmed that the facility was unable to provide documented evidence indicating Resident 10 and/or Resident 10's representative was provided the facility's bed hold policy upon hospital transfer. 28 Pa Code 201.18 (e)(1) Management. 28 Pa Code 201.29 (b)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-01-11 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for four residents out of 18 residents sampled (Residents 10, 29, 39, and 3). The findings include: A review of Resident 39's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on September 7, 2023, and returned to the facility on September 11, 2023. A review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on November 10, 2023, and returned to the facility on November 15, 2023. A review of Resident 29's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on December 5, 2023, and returned to the facility on December 6, 2023. A review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on April 27, 2023, and returned to the facility on May 1, 2023. Resident 3 was also transferred to the hospital on May 4, 2023, and returned to the facility on May 10, 2023.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-01-11 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to send copies of the written notices of facility initiated transfers to a representative of the Office of the State Long Term-Care Ombudsman for three out of 18 residents sampled (Resident 10, 29 and 39). Findings include: A review of Resident 39's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on September 7, 2023, and returned to the facility on September 11, 2023. A review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on November 10, 2023, and returned to the facility on November 15, 2023. A review of Resident 29's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on December 5, 2023, and returned to the facility on December 6, 2023. There was no documented evidence that the facility sent copies of the written transfer notices to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for these facility-initiated transfers. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HEALTH DIMENSIONS GROUP — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIRST COLUMBIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | since 07/09/2018 |
| DZURNAK, M | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/02/2012 |
| EMANUEL, JEFFREY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/01/2017 |
| FETTERMAN, SUSAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2017 |
| IVANKO, DONNA MARIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/02/2012 |
| MILLER, O. FRED | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2017 |
| MOWAD, CHRISTEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/21/2015 |
| NOVAK, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2017 |
| ONCAY, KAREN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/01/2017 |
| ORLIK, MICHAEL ANN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/02/2004 |
| SABLE, BARBARA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2016 |
| SMITH, PAMELA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/20/2021 |
| SWAYZE, MARIA SARA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/16/2003 |
| MOFFA, DOMINIC | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2019 |
| HEALTH DIMENSIONS CONSULTING INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/24/2025 |
| BRISCOE, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/19/2014 |
| BRISCOE, PATRICIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/19/2014 |
| GRESH, AMANDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2025 |
| HENNESSEY, ERIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/19/2014 |
| ROGOTZKE, AMBER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/19/2014 |
| SHVETZOFF, SERGEI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/19/2014 |
| SHVETZOFF, TAMI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/19/2014 |
| SPOTTS, THEODORE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/29/2020 |
| URICK, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/1994 |
| BURKE, GREG | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/1993 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 45 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395824. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.