Sienna Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 55% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 38.1 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-08-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, hospital record review, self-reported incident review, policy review and interview the facility failed to prevent an incident of resident-to-resident sexual abuse/assault involving Resident #13. Actual harm occurred based on the reasonable person concept on 08/22/23 when Resident #13, who was severely cognitively impaired and was unable to provide evidence of consent was sexually assaulted by Resident #26 who was observed fondling the resident's breast and with possible vaginal bleeding (per hospital record review). This affected one (Resident #13) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 25. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #13 had diagnoses including early onset Alzheimer's disease, muscle contractures of the right hand and right and left elbows, oral phase dysphagia, insomnia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of a service order, review of the facility's grievance/ concern log, review of resident council meeting minutes, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were afforded the right to a comfortable living environment by not maintaining comfortable temperature levels in the facility's shower room while residents were bathing. This had the potential to affect all but three residents (#10, #27, and #33) of the facility's 33 residents, who the facility identified as not having the use of the shared shower room. Findings include: On 04/01/25 at 10:18 A.M., an observation of the facility's only shared shower room located on the 300 hall revealed it did not have a working heater. There was a long heater that was noted to run along the back wall of the shower room that was part of the heat supplied by the facility's boilers. There was no way to turn on the wall unit that was part of the boiler system from inside the shower room. There was another 12 inch…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility-reported incident, staff statements, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff treated all residents with respect and dignity. This affected one resident (#10) of three residents reviewed for facility-reported incidents (FRI). The facility census was 33 . Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, and vascular dementia. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10's cognition was severely impaired. Review of a witness statement by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #300 dated 02/13/25 revealed Resident #10 had asked to go back to her room. CNA #300 and #215 took Resident #10 to her room and when they opened the door, CNA #110 was there and stated, I'm not putting her to f*cking bed, I put her to bed once already. CNA #300 stated this was said in front of Resident #10. CNA #300 & #215 laid Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and common areas were maintained in a clean and comfortable manner by repairing and painting walls properly. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents within the facility. Findings include: Observations throughout the survey from 02/03/25 to 02/06/25 revealed numerous resident rooms and common areas with evidence of repaired drywall which had not been properly painted. Observations with the facility administrator on 02/06/25 from 9:30 A.M. to 9:40 A.M. revealed the following areas of disrepair concerns: • room [ROOM NUMBER] had drywall repair without evidence of repainting • hallway next to room [ROOM NUMBER] had drywall repair without evidence of repainting • room [ROOM NUMBER] had drywall repair without evidence of repainting • room [ROOM NUMBER] had drywall repair without evidence of repainting • room [ROOM NUMBER] drywall repair without evidence of repainting • room [ROOM NUMBER] damaged drywall from resident beds…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of the Beneficiary Notice worksheet, review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) 10123 instructions, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) name and contact information. This affected four (Resident #1, Resident #11, Resident #33, Resident #34) of five residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, dysphagia, muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of entrance conference worksheet for Beneficiary Notice (resident who has been discharged from Medicare covered Part A stay with benefits days remaining in the past six months) undated revealed Resident #34 was discharged from skilled services on 12/26/24 and had remained in the facility. Review of Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) 10123 dated 12/24/24 revealed the QIO name and contact information was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident personal items were safe guarded from potential theft. This affected one resident (Resident #15) of one residents reviewed for personal property. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, type II diabetes, hypertension, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, end stage renal disease and dialysis dependent. Review of Resident #15's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview of mental status score (BIMS) of 15 (out of 15), meaning cognition intact. Interview on 02/03/25 at 9:01 A.M. with Resident #15 revealed his personal snacks, located in his drawer, have come up missing. The resident believed Resident #6, who shared a [NAME] and [NAME] bathroom, comes in through the bathroom door and takes his snacks. The resident had reported the missing snacks several times to staff, however it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) document accurately reflected an in-patient psychiatric hospitalization/significant change of condition. This affected one (Resident #37) of one residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 34. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, dementia, liver disease, multiple sclerosis, anxiety disorder, epilepsy, unspecified intellectual disabilities, and mild cognitive impairment. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/09/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of a nursing progress note, dated 10/29/24, revealed Resident #5 was admitted for an inpatient psychiatric evaluation. Review of the psychiatric hospital's Discharge Summary revealed Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] for increased…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews, observations, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #195 was assessed for activity preferences and offered activities to meet his interests. This affected one (Resident #195) of one residents reviewed for activities. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #195 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, cerebral infarction, diabetes type one, and difficulty walking. Review of Resident #195's medical record revealed no evidence of an activity assessment. Review of Resident #195's progress notes revealed on 01/24/25 a social services note was entered at 4:08 P.M., that indicated the resident was dependent for all care and administration of medications. The resident had hearing aids and glasses. His speech was clear, and he was easily understood. There was no evidence that the resident's activity preferences were reviewed. Review of Resident #195's task (Certified Nursing Assistants) documentation dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an individualized, comprehensive plan of care was in place to ensure safe smoking strategies and skin alterations from smoking were timely identified. This affected one resident (Resident #6) of one residents reviewed for smoking. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including delusions, paranoid schizophrenia, depression, diabetes, dementia, behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's, glaucoma, nicotine dependence (cigarettes), and abnormal involuntary movements. Review of Resident #6 smoking assessment dated [DATE] and 01/03/25 revealed the resident had no cognitive loss or dexterity problems. The resident had a visual deficit. The resident smokes five-10 times a day and used a smoking apron and required supervision. The facility stored the lighter and cigarettes. The plan of care was to assure residents were safe while smoking. There…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of dialysis dietician notes, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide Resident #15 with appropriate diet and snacks as ordered by the dialysis center dietician and failed to ensure communication between the facility dietician and dialysis dietician occurred to provide Resident #15 a comprehensive nutrition plan to meet the resident's needs. This affected one resident (Resident #15) of one reviewed for dialysis. Findings included: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/14/24 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, morbid obesity, heart failure, sepsis, hypertension, and end stage renal disease- dialysis dependent. Further review revealed no evidence of dialysis dietician communication notes since 04/23/24. Review of the nutritional communication forms/notes from dialysis dated 10/28/24, 12/18/24 and 01/27/25 (with a faxed date of 02/04/25 on the forms) revealed the dialysis dietician ordered a high protein snack at night,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of dialysis communication notes, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #15 received medication as ordered and the dialysis plan of care was accurate. This affected one (Resident #15) of one reviewed for dialysis. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, morbid obesity, pneumonia, heart failure, sepsis, hypertension, dysphagia, bundle branch block, major depressive disorder, end stage renal disease dialysis dependent. a. Review of the nutritional communication form from dialysis dated 10/28/24, 12/18/24, and 01/27/25 revealed Resident # 15 did not meet his phosphorous goal of 3.0-3.5. Orders to administer calcium acetate at each meal and snack. Review of un-dated mealtimes (provided by the facility) revealed breakfast was at 7:45 A.M., lunch at 12:00 P.M., and dinner at 5:15 P.M. Review of Resident #15's orders and Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILLSTONE HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $239K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH