Roselawn Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 41.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #10 and Resident #15 was free from resident to resident sexual abuse. This finding affected two residents (Resident #10 and Resident #15) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of the Self-Reported Incident Investigation (SRI) tracking number #261364 dated 06/08/25 at 1:38 P.M. revealed the nurse was advised by the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) that Resident #10 was in his wheelchair with his pants down while Resident #15 had his head in Resident #10's lap performing oral sex. The facility unsubstantiated the SRI for abuse. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, manic episode and depression. Review of Resident #10's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #10's Behavioral Care Plan revealed to administer medications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31 received the pneumococcal vaccine after signing consent, failed to ensure that Residents #34, #36, and #39 or their resident representative were given the opportunity to consent to or refuse the pneumococcal vaccine, and failed to ensure the medical record contained evidence Residents #31, #34, #36, #38, and #39 received education regarding the benefits and risks of immunization against the pneumococcal virus and each of these residents either received or did not receive the pneumococcal vaccine. This affected five residents (#31, #34, #36, #38, and #39) of 13 residents who were reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 11/15/24. Diagnoses included epilepsy, depression, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and alcohol abuse. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions and parameters were in place to effectively manage pain for Resident #19. This affected one resident (#19) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 01/14/25. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, hepatitis, schizophrenia, chronic pain syndrome, and cirrhosis. Review of the care plan dated 01/15/25 revealed Resident #19 was at risk for pain due to chronic pain syndrome. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, assisting with repositioning when in a chair or bed, observing for medication side effects and assessing for pain frequency, intensity, duration, and onset. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact. He was independent for eating, oral and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, review of the manufacturer's instructions and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #38's medications were given per physician's orders. This affected one resident (#38) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 11/18/24 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, nonpsychotic mental disorder, polyneuropathy, paranoid schizophrenia, unspecified malignancy of skin, essential hypertension, and atrial premature depolarization. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 11/25/24 revealed Resident #38 had mild cognitive impairment. Resident #38 received insulin injections seven days of the seven-day look-back period and had two insulin order changes during that time. Review of physician orders revealed the following two insulin orders dated 11/19/24: • Insulin Lispro injection pen 100 units per milliliter (units/ml), inject…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and review of facility policies, the facility failed to properly clean and disinfect the blood glucose monitor (BGM/glucometer) between resident use. This affected two residents (#6 and #18) of six residents observed during medication administration and had the potential to affect seven additional residents (#1, #2, #8, #10, #19, #21, and #23) in the 300 hall who had orders for blood sugar monitoring. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an original admission date of 12/30/20 with a re-entry date of 06/25/21. Diagnoses included stage two chronic kidney disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), iron deficiency anemia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic gastritis, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #6 had an order dated 06/25/24 for NovoLog FlexPen Solution Pen-injector (Insulin Aspart) 100 units per milliliter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-06-02 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. This affected one sampled resident (#24) and had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Record review for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 03/04/20 with diagnoses including muscle wasting, atrophy and adult failure to thrive. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #24 for the months of May 2022 and June 2022 revealed orders for a regular texture diet with regular consistency, whole milk with each meal, cream soup with lunch and supper, large portions each meal and a magic cup (supplement) before meals and at bedtime four times a day. On 05/31/22 at 9:25 A.M. observation of the kitchen area revealed Dietary Assistant (DA) #18 was the only staff member available in the kitchen. Observation of the kitchen area revealed dirty dishes were piled in the sinks and on the counters. DA #18 verified the condition of the kitchen and indicated it was because she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-06-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure food items were served at an appetizing and palatable temperature for all residents. This affected four residents (#14, #3, #17 and #24) and had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated 01/06/22 revealed resident concerns with dietary which included concerns of cold food. On 05/31/22 at 9:52 A.M. interview with Resident #17 revealed breakfast was cold every morning and lunch was not good either. On 05/31/22 at 10:49 A.M. interview with Resident #3 revealed dietary concerns including the food was always cold, never warm when served. On 05/31/22 at 11:25 A.M. interview with Resident #14 revealed concerns his food was often served cold. On 06/01/22 at 12:15 P.M. interview with Resident #24 revealed concerns at times the food served was cold. On 06/01/22 at 12:08 P.M. observation of the lunch meal revealed the meal consisted of spaghetti with hamburger meat sauce, peas and a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure food items were prepared and distributed under sanitary conditions to prevent contamination and/or food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 06/01/22 at 11:42 A.M. observation of the tray line service for the lunch meal revealed Dietary Manager #23 had tested the temperatures of the of the food items on the steam table. Dietary Manager #23 had disposable gloves on both hands. After completing the food temperatures, Dietary Manager #23 dropped the alcohol wipe including the wrap the wipe came in on the floor. Dietary Manager #23 reached down and picked the wipe and covering off the floor, walked over to the trash can, removed the lid to the trash can and threw the wipe and covering away. Dietary Manager #23 then walked back to the tray line, picked up bread sticks with the hand he removed the trash can lid up with (no utensils were used) and placed the bread sticks on the plates to be served to the residents.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate wound care for Resident #23 to prevent infection and to promote optimal healing. This affected one resident (#23) of two residents reviewed for wound care. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, history of COVID-19, schizoaffective disorder, osteoarthritis, severe sepsis, osteomyelitis, gout, migraines, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, bronchospasm, kidney disease, diabetes, post traumatic stress disorder, depressive disorders and anxiety disorders. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/15/22 revealed Resident #23 had intact cognition and no pressure ulcers. Review of the May 2022 physician's orders revealed Resident #23 had an order, dated 05/26/22 to cleanse right heel with wound cleanser, pat dry, activate derma-blue with normal saline, apply to wound,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure weight loss interventions were provided as ordered by the physician for Resident #24. This affected one resident (#24) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of the Consulting Management Fall Winter menu, signed by Dietitian #43 dated 10/08/21 revealed milk was to be served with each meal. Record review for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 03/04/20 with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, weakness and adult failure to thrive. Review of laboratory results for Resident #24 revealed on 10/04/21 Resident #24's protein level was 6.1 (normal range was 6.0-8.3). On 01/05/22 Resident #24's protein level was 6.6. On 01/27/22 Resident #24's protein level was 5.3 and on 04/04/22 Resident #24's protein level was 5.7. Record review revealed a plan of care, dated 04/15/22 indicating Resident #24 had potential for alteration in nutrition and hydration related to underweight status, variable intake and adult failure to thrive. Interventions included to provide diet and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILLSTONE HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $548K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH