Crystal Care Of Coal Grove

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 50.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of the hospital records, review of laboratory test requisitions, review of the facility's laboratory contract, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely and appropriate care and services were provided for Resident #60 following a change in condition. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening injuries, negative health outcome and/or death on [DATE] at 10:29 A.M. when Resident #60 experienced a decline in condition. Nurse Practitioner (NP) #500 was notified of Resident #60's decline and provided new orders to obtain STAT (urgent) laboratory tests. The ordered laboratory tests were never obtained, and neither the physician nor the NP were notified of the laboratory tests not being obtained. On [DATE] at 8:40 A.M., Resident #60 further declined with pale, clammy skin and diminished breath sounds and the facility did not notify the physician nor the NP of Resident #60's decline in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans to address Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and suicidal ideations were initiated. This affected two Residents (#3 and #4) of 18 resident care plans reviewed. The facility census was 53. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 02/11/25 and a readmission date of 07/25/25 with diagnoses including Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), insomnia, anxiety, depression, diabetes mellitus type two and bilateral above the knee amputations. Review of the five day Medicare minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact with no behaviors. Resident #3 needed assistance from the staff to complete activities of daily living. Resident #3 had diagnoses of PTSD, anxiety and depression. Review of the plan of care for Resident #3 revealed no plan of care addressing the PTSD cause, resident triggers, resident reaction behaviors and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure there were parameters in place for administration of as needed pain medications and non-pharmacological interventions. This affected one resident (#5) of four residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 53.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 07/25/25 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease stage three, unspecified psychosis, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus and malignant nodule of the lung. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 08/25 and 09/25 revealed Resident #5 received Tylenol 650 milligrams (mg) by mouth every eight hours as needed for pain, Tramadol 50mg by mouth every six hours as needed for pain and no nonpharmacological interventions were ordered. Additionally, no pain level parameters noted of when to administer each medication. Review of the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide an adequate plan of care for post-traumatic stress disorder and ensure staff were knowledgeable in the plan of care. This affected one (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for mood and behavior. The facility census was 53.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 03/02/25. Diagnoses included PTSD, anxiety disorder, and depression.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 was cognitively intact and was able to make her needs known.Review of the trauma evaluation dated 03/02/25 revealed Resident #20 had experienced emotional abuse from earlier in her life with triggers of being in large crowds. Symptoms due to her PTSD included difficulty sleeping, fear, severe anxiety, and feelings of guilt or shame. Triggers included large groups of people.Review of the care plan dated 05/02/24 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to implement pharmacy recommendations. This affected two Residents (#5 and #42) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 53. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 07/25/25 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease stage three, unspecified psychosis, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, delusional disorder, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder and malignant nodule of the lung. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 04/25, 05/25, 06/25, 07/25 and 08/25 revealed Resident #5 received Divalproex Sodium Sprinkles 125 milligrams (mg) by mouth, give four capsules to equal 500mg three times daily for schizoaffective disorder.Review of the pharmacy recommendations for Resident #5 dated 04/05/25 revealed Resident #5 was receiving the medication Depakote. The recommendation requested labs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure vital signs were monitored as ordered prior to the administration of medication. This affected one resident (#2) out of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 53. Findings include:Record review for Resident #2 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included hypertension, bipolar disorder, and depression.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/18/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition.Review of the active physicians order, dated 11/02/24, revealed the resident was to be administered 25 milligrams of Metoprolol (an anti-hypertensive medication) twice a day for hypertension and to hold medication for pulse below 60. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and recorded vital signs from 09/01/25 through 09/11/25 revealed no evidence the residents pulse was obtained prior to the administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, observation, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with incontinence care and eating. This affected three (Residents #23, #47, #53) of 37 facility-identified incontinent residents and affected one (Resident #53) of five facility-identified residents who required physical assistance with meal consumption. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the lists provided by the facility revealed there were 37 residents (#1 #3, #4, #5, #8, #9, #10, #11, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #21, #22, #23, #27, #28, #30, #32, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #41, #42, #44, #45, #46, #47, #49, #51, and #52) identified as being incontinent of bowel and/or bladder and five residents (#4, #47, #53, #44, and #49) who required physical assistance from staff for eating. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 01/30/24 with diagnoses including depression, hypertension, anxiety, and age-related cognitive decline. Review of the Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, observation, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient staff present to provide care and services to residents. This affected three (Residents #23, #47, #53) of 37 facility-identified incontinent residents and affected one (Resident #53) of five facility-identified residents who required physical assistance with meal consumption. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the lists provided by the facility revealed there were 37 residents (#1 #3, #4, #5, #8, #9, #10, #11, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #21, #22, #23, #27, #28, #30, #32, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #41, #42, #44, #45, #46, #47, #49, #51, and #52) identified as being incontinent of bowel and/or bladder and five residents (#4, #47, #53, #44, and #49) who required physical assistance from staff for eating. Observation on 03/25/24 at 8:25 A.M. revealed there were two licensed nurses and three State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) present in the facility to provide care for 52 residents. Interview on 03/25/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure target behaviors were identified and appropriate indications for use of antipsychotic medications. This affected six residents (#16, #28, #30, #36, #38 and #43) of seven reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 41. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 12/21/18 with diagnoses including hypertension, psychosis and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician orders for October 2023 revealed Resident #16 was ordered clonazepam (antianxiety medications) 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth three times a day for unspecified psychosis, risperidone (antipsychotic medications) four mg by mouth two times daily for unspecified psychosis and citalopram hydrobromide (antidepressant medication) 40 mg by mouth daily for inappropriate sexual behaviors. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was severely cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the infection/antibiotic stewardship log, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure all prescribed antibiotics were appropriate. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the infection control log dated 01/2023 to 09/2023 revealed there was no evidence in February, March, April, May, June and September 2023 the facility identified the organism of the infection and ensured the antibiotic met the criteria for treatment. Further review of the log revealed in February 2023 there was six urinary tract infections (UTI), two gastrointestinal (GI), one skin, and three lower respiratory infections identified. All the infections were treated with antibiotics and did not meet the criteria for antibiotic treatment. Further review of the log revealed in March 2023 there was two upper respiratory infections (URI), two lower respiratory infection, two GI infections, three skin infections, and five UTI's identified. All the infections were treated with antibiotics and did not meet the criteria for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy revealed the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring, screening and offering of pneumonia vaccine. This affected four residents (#28, #29, #30 and #36) of five reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #28, #29, #30 and #36 revealed the residents did not receive the appropriate pneumonia vaccination based on the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. Interview on 10/19/23 at 3:40 P.M. with the Director of Nursing and the Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed Resident #28, #29 #30 and #36 did not receive the appropriate pneumonia vaccination as recommended by the CDC. Review of the facility policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, with no date, indicated prior to admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine series within thirty days of the admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$159,708 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $159,708 — penalty dated 2024-03-04
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-29 for 18 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILLSTONE HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $308K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH