Pine Ridge Skilled Nursing And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 48.3 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen sanitation was maintained and provide meals in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 47 of 47 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified two (Resident #2 and #3) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 49.Findings Include:Observation during initial kitchen tour on 06/28/26 at 8:35 A.M. the following was observed:1. In the reach in refrigerator there was an opened undated package of donuts. There was a plate of food unwrapped with no date or label. There were two large pans of gelatin dessert, undated and unlabeled. The reach in refrigerator had no thermometer inside.The deep freezer had no thermometer inside. There were six wrapped sandwiches dated 06/22/25.There was a plate of sliced tomatoes undated.The upright freezer had a heavy build up of approximately a quarter inch of white frost on top, bottom and on the shelves.2.The refrigerator temperature logs, for three different refrigerators and freezers, had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen garbage was sealed.This had the potential to affect 47 of 47 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified two (Resident #2 and #3) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 49.Findings Include:Observation during initial kitchen tour on 06/28/26 at 8:35 A.M. revealed three garbage cans, not actively in use, were not covered.Interview on 06/28/26 at 8:35 A.M. the Administrator verified the three kitchen garbage cans were not actively in use and should have been covered.Observation on 06/29/26 at 12:15 P.M. with [NAME] #358 verified three garbage cans, which were not actively in use, were not covered.Observation on 06/30/26 at 8:45 A.M. [NAME] #318 verified three garbage cans, which were not actively in use, were not covered.Review of facility policy titled Garbage and Rubbish Disposal, undated revealed all garbage containers shall be provided with tight fitting lids and must be kept covered when stored or not in continuous use. This deficiency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-30 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure essential kitchen equipment was operating and maintained in good condition. This had the potential to affect 47 of 47 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified two (Resident #2 and #3) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 49.Findings Include:1. Observation during the initial kitchen tour on 06/28/26 at 8:35 A.M. and on 06/30/26 at 12:15 P.M., of the large three-door refrigerator, revealed there was one quarter to one half inch of standing water on the bottom of the refrigerator shelf and dripping from the top of the refrigerator. Bags of food were wet from the dripping water. Observation on 06/28/26 at 1:20 P.M. of a resident refrigerator on the 200 unit revealed the freezer section had a heavy one half inch build-up of white ice on the top and side surfaces. The gasket around the freezer was splintered and did not attach well to the freezer compartment. Interview on 06/28/26 at 1:20 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #354 verified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity during meals. This affected two (Resident #37 and #49) of 18 residents observed for dining. The facility census was 49.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, contracture of the left hand, chronic pain, and degeneration of nervous system. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had severely impaired cognition and required partial to moderate assistance when eating.2.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, dementia, and Parkinson's Disease. Review of the MDS comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had severely impaired cognition and required partial assistance for eating.Observation on 06/28/26 at 11:30 A.M. in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, staff interview, and review of the facility, the facility failed to implement resident tube feeding orders upon admission. This affected one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility identified one (Resident #19) with orders for tube feeding. The facility census was 46 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 05/14/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and mild protein-calorie malnutrition. Resident #19 transferred to the hospital on [DATE], was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], was transferred again to the hospital on [DATE], and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #19 dated 09/06/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items, a kitchen dehumidifier, and the kitchen flooring were maintained in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This affected 47 out of 47 residents that resided in the facility. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 11/12/24 at 8:31 A.M. revealed there was a black substance and a gray fuzzy substance on the dehumidifier in the kitchen. There was also black substance built up on the kitchen floor and a frozen pack of raw original bratwurst on a Styrofoam tray that was covered with plastic wrap in the freezer that was next to a bag of frozen asparagus. Interview with Dietary Supervisor #72 on 11/12/24 at 8:31 A.M. verified there was a black substance and a gray fuzzy substance on the dehumidifier in the kitchen. Dietary Supervisor #72 also verified there was also a black substance built up on the kitchen floor and a frozen pack of raw original bratwurst on a Styrofoam tray that was covered with plastic wrap in the freezer that was next to a bag of frozen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with an adequate privacy curtain. This affected one (Resident #20) of one resident reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of Resident #20's chart revealed Resident #20 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus without complications, congestive heart failure, hypothyroidism, hypertension, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, insomnia, rheumatoid arthritis, cellulitis of right lower limb, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Review of Resident #20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Observation of Resident #20's room on 11/12/24 at 9:30 A.M. revealed the privacy curtain between Resident #20 and Resident #20's roommate's bed did not cover the whole…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the provider and family were notified when medications were unavailable for administration as ordered. The affected two (Residents #42 and #20) of eight residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute on chronic diastolic heart failure, stage three chronic kidney disease, and type two diabetes. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of the medical record revealed progress notes dated 11/11/24, 11/04/24, 10/28/24, 10/21/24, 10/14/24, 10/07/24, and 09/30/24 revealed no documentation of family or provider notification that Ozempic medication was not available and was not given. During an interview on 11/12/24 at 9:36 A.M.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had comprehensive care plans. This affected two (Residents #42 and #20) of eight residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted tot he facility on 08/06/24. Diagnoses included acute on chronic diastolic heart failure, stage three chronic kidney disease, and type two diabetes. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of the care plan dated 08/08/24 revealed no care plans for diabetes, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney failure. During an interview on 11/14/24 at 10:40 A.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #42's care plan was incomplete and did not address the resident's known medical conditions. 2. Review of Resident #20's chart revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available and administered as ordered. This affected two (Residents #20 and #42) of five residents sampled for medications administration. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted tot he facility on 08/06/24. Diagnoses included acute on chronic diastolic heart failure, stage three chronic kidney disease, and type two diabetes. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 had physician orders dated 08/12/24 for Ozempic (0.25 or 0.5 milligram (mg)/dose) Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 2 mg/3 milliliters (ml) (Semaglutide) Inject 0.5 mg subcutaneously once weekly every Monday for Diabetes. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILLSTONE HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $240K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH