Divine Rehabilitation And Nursing At Canal Pointe
145 Olive St, Akron, OH 44310 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (330) 762-0901 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 66.9% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.1% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 36.9% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.6% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.6% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.4% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 24.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 110.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide food at appetizing temperatures. This had the potential to affect 108 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (#31, #51, and #108) who received nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 111.Findings include:An interview on 09/09/25 at 10:06 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #100 revealed there had been residents complaining about hot foods being served cold. An observation was conducted on 09/09/25 at 10:46 A.M. of the kitchen tray line being set-up for the lunch meal service. The lunch meal consisted of corn, Spanish rice, chicken enchilada, and enchilada sauce. Temperatures at the start of tray line service were recorded as followed by [NAME] #306 between 11:15 A.M. and 11:16 A.M.: the corn was 158 degrees Fahrenheit (°F), Spanish rice was 170 °F, chicken enchilada was 170 °F and enchilada sauce was 170°F. During the tray line observation there were no plate warmers nor hot pellets used to help conserve food temperature after the foods were plated for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect 108 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (#31, #51, and #108) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 111. Findings include: Review of pest control invoices dated 07/15/25 to 08/27/25 revealed pest control serviced for kitchen insects and existing rodent bait stations on 07/15/25, and on 08/27/25 extra service was provided for rodents. An interview on 09/09/25 at 10:06 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #100 revealed they were aware of an existing problem with small, flying insects in the kitchen. An observation was conducted on 09/09/25 at 10:46 A.M. with DS #100 and revealed the following concerns: ten small, flying insects were hovering above the handwash sink. Two small, flying insects were hovering around the dishwasher. Six small, flying insects were flying near a hanging dish cabinet, and three small, flying insects were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored. This affected one resident (Resident #212) and had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility also failed to discard expired medications. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 111 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #212 revealed an admission date of 05/02/25 and a readmission date of 05/16/25 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and borderline personality disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated for Resident #212 dated 05/23/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and was independent with mobility. Record the medical record for Resident #212 revealed it did not include a physician's order or other documentation indicating the resident was capable of self-administration of medications. Observation of Resident #212's room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of the facility policy and record review the facility failed to ensure foods in unit refrigerators were labeled, dated and not retained when expired and stored in a clean environment. This had the potential to affect 108 residents receiving meals from the kitchen as three residents (#63, #104 and #106) were ordered nothing-by-mouth (NPO). Facility census was 111. Findings include: Observation on 06/02/25 with Dietary Manager (DM) #425 starting at 9:58 A.M. revealed the following areas of concern: • In the third floor nourishment refrigerator, there was an expired bottle of soy sauce dated 11/29/24, an expired container of 2% milk dated 05/04/25, an undated bowl of mashed potatoes, an undated bowl containing a piece of cake, a bag labeled with Resident #112's name and the date 05/19/25, a container with Resident #32's name and no date, three bags of various takeout/fast foods with no name and no date, a wilted salad with no date, an expired container of apples dated 05/23/25, an expired container of potato salad dated 04/07/25 and a expired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-09 · tag F0836 — widespreadEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel files and interviews with staff, the facility failed to ensure employees received the required annual training. This affected 13 of 13 employees reviewed for personnel files and had the potential to affect all 111 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel files with Human Resource Director (HRD) #423 revealed the employees were receiving two packets of in-services. One was titled Yearly In-services listing 9.5 hours' worth of in-services. By signing, employees acknowledged they had read and reviewed all in-services listed above. The other one was titled Annual Inservice Packet with 12.5 hours. By signing, employees acknowledged they had read and reviewed all in-services listed above. The second page of this packet stated This packet of annual mandatory in-services has been developed to help remind you of important policies and practices. Please take time to read them and sign the forms included. Review of the personnel files for the Administrator, Dietary #404, Dietary #410, Maintenance #422, Dietary Supervisor #425,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-09 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel files and interviews with staff the facility failed to provide regular training for the certified nursing assistants (CNAs) for their 12 in-services annually. This had the potential to affect all 111 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel files for CNA #474 with hire date of 06/23/22, CNA #501 with hire date of 02/28/24 and CNA #512 with the hire date of 05/15/24 revealed there was no evidence they received regular training throughout the year for their required 12 hours of in-services annually. Interview on 06/05/25 at approximately 11:30 A.M. with Human Resource Director (HRD) #423 revealed the facility stopped using an online training program over a year ago. The facility provided staff with a stack of in-services for the whole year at one time upon orientation and annually. The first page was signed by the employee. It listed all of the in-services. The rest of the packet was information on each topic. HRD #423 stated she was not sure how to track in-services otherwise and verified there was no system in place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, homelike environment. This affected two (Residents #3 and #6) reviewed for their bedroom environment and had the potential to affect an additional 78 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #12, #13, #14, #17, #18, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #32, #33, #34, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #44, #45, #47, #49, #50, #52, #53, #56, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #77, #78, #82, #85, #86, #87, #88, #89, #90, #91, #92, #93, #96, #97, #103, #104, #112, #211, #212, #213, and #311) residing on the second and third floor of the facility. The facility census was 111. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 07/03/24. Diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse. This affected four (Residents #48, #50, #58, #214) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 111. Findings include: 1. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, heart disease, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), left below the knee amputation, and an internal cardiac defibrillator. Review of the comprehensive quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact, refused aspects of care daily, and needed no assistance with personal care. Review of SRI tracking number 260710, dated 05/21/25, was filed with the State agency for an allegation of physical abuse. Resident #48 and Resident #214 were in the facility's lobby waiting for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were in place relative to residents' medical, psychosocial and mental needs. This affected five (Residents #6, #46, #69, #102 and #107) out of 37 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 111. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #107's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/08/25 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of prostate, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety and hypertension. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #107 was cognitively intact and receiving hospice services. Oxygen was not coded on the MDS assessment. Review of Resident #107's care plans as of 06/02/25 revealed no plan of care was in place for the use of oxygen. Observation on 06/02/25 at 2:00 P.M. revealed Resident #107 was up and awake in his bed. Oxygen was in use, and no date was noted on the tubing connected to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely assess and/or accurately assess residents for smoking. This affected four (Residents #22, #58, #64 and #86) of four residents reviewed for smoking. The census was 111. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 03/30/12. Diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, asthma, anemia and viral hepatitis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was cognitively impaired. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was six out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the June 2025 orders revealed Resident #22 was okay to smoke without supervision. The order was dated 06/04/25 at 7:00 P.M. Review of the smoking safety screen for Resident #22 dated 06/04/25 revealed the question Does resident have cognitive loss? with an answer marked as No. Review of the care plan initiated on 04/12/12 revealed:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
4.Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 01/25/23 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #48 dated 04/01/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the MAR for Resident #48 dated May 2025 revealed medications were administered several hours after the medication was ordered: metoprolol, Entresto, Lasix, Ativan, gabapentin, spironolactone, Macrobid scheduled for 05/04/25 at 9:00 A.M. were given at 11:27 A.M., Macrobid, Colchicine, Eliquis, trazodone scheduled for 05/04/25 at 9:00 P.M. were given at 11:27 P.M., insulin Lispro scheduled for 05/04/25 at 8:00 A.M. was given at 10:46 A.M., Depakote, metoprolol, Entresto, Tamsulosin scheduled for 05/04/25 at 9:00 P.M. were given at 11:24 P.M., insulin Glargine scheduled for 05/05/25 at 9:00 A.M. was given at 11:23 A.M., Gabapentin, Tamsulosin, Entresto, metoprolol, Depakote, trazodone, Eliquis, Colchicine, Macrobid and insulin Glargine scheduled for 05/05/25 at 9:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, menu review and review of the menu spreadsheet, the facility failed to provide food items at the designated portions as written. This affected 101 residents receiving food from the kitchen as three residents (#63, #104 and #106) were ordered nothing-by-mouth (NPO) and seven residents (#9, #10, #24, #54, #74, #95 and #112) were observed to receive alternate meals during the observation. The facility census was 111. Findings include: Review of the menu for week three, dated as Spring/Summer 2025, revealed for lunch on Tuesday (06/03/25), the meal to be served included Polish sausage, potato wedges, sauteed peppers and onions, choice of roll, choice of cookie, milk and coffee/tea. Review of the menu spreadsheet for the lunch meal on 06/03/25 revealed the following portions were to be served: Polish sausage, one each; potato wedges, three ounces; sauteed peppers and onions, four ounces; choice of roll, one each; choice of cookie; one each. The diet extension for mechanical soft diets revealed these residents were to receive a #6-scoop (two thirds of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician and resident's responsible party were notified when lab draws were not completed according to the physician/certified nurse practitioner (CNP) orders. This affected one (Resident #66) of three residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 111. Findings include: Record review for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 04/01/24. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, cerebral infarction, personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremity. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the care plan dated 04/13/24 revealed Resident #66 had a cerebral vascular accident (CVA/Stroke) related to embolism. Interventions included administering medications as ordered by the physician. Review of the Pharmacy Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident between Residents #48 and #214. This affected two (Residents #48 and #214) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 111. Findings Include: 1. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure, diabetes, heart disease, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a left below the knee amputation, and an internal cardiac defibrillator. Review of the comprehensive quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact, refused aspects of care daily, and needed no assistance with personal care. Review of SRI tracking number 260710, dated 05/21/25, filed with the State agency for an allegation of physical abuse. Resident #48 and Resident #214 were in the facility's lobby…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse to the State agency for one (Resident #58) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 111. Findings include: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bipolar disorder, major depression disorder, schizophrenia, high blood pressure, and mood disorder. Review of the comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 was severely cognitively impaired, had delusions, and had behaviors which significantly interfered with the resident's care and social interaction, significantly intruded on the privacy or activities of others, and had behaviors that significantly disrupted the living environment. Review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #58 revealed on 05/28/25 at 10:56 A.M. Nurse Practitioner (NP) #517, who is the facility's psychiatric NP, evaluated the resident. Resident #58…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor Resident #66's daily fluid intake and daily urine output related to a diagnosis of urinary retention requiring the use of an indwelling urinary catheter and discontinuation of the indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one (Resident #66) of two residents reviewed for indwelling catheters. The facility census was 111. Findings include: Record review for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 04/01/24. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, cerebral infarction, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and retention of urine. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #66 had an indwelling urinary catheter and required set up or clean up assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the progress note dated 12/31/24 at 6:19 A.M. revealed Resident #66 was observed coming to the nurse's station to speak with the nurse. Resident #66 then went back towards…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #67 received all nutritional interventions recommended by the registered dietitian to treat and prevent significant weight loss. This affected one resident (Resident #67) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 111. Findings include: Record review for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 06/13/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, type one diabetes mellitus, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #67 required set up or clean up assistance with meals, had weight loss and was not on a prescribed weight loss regimen. Review of the care plan for Resident #67 dated revised 04/17/25 revealed the resident had nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to forgetfulness related to Alzheimer's/dementia. Diagnoses including type one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure orders were in place for the administration of oxygen and failed to date oxygen tubing as required. This affected one resident (#107) of one resident reviewed for oxygen and had the potential to affect an additional 13 residents (#1, #57, #65, #69, #74, #80, #84, #89, #97, #99, #106, #262 and #311) the facility identified as receiving oxygen in the facility. Facility census was 111. Findings include: Review of Resident #107's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/08/25 and diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of prostate, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety and hypertension. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #107 was cognitively intact and receiving hospice services. Oxygen was not coded on the MDS assessment. Review of Resident #107's physician's orders as of 06/02/25 revealed no orders were in place relative to oxygen.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain communication from the dialysis provider after each dialysis treatment. This affected one resident (Resident #94) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 111. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis of the left ankle and foot, diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, end stage renal disease dependent on dialysis, congestive heart failure, high blood pressure, Tourette's disorder, schizophrenia, and anxiety. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #94 attended dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. The resident was on a fluid restriction of 2000 milliliters (ml) per 12 hour shift. Review of the comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 , dated 05/20/25, revealed Resident #94 was cognitively intact, received daily insulin medications and diuretics, and received dialysis. Review of the pre and post…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for Resident #212. This affected one (Resident #212) of one resident reviewed for suicidal ideations. The facility census was 111. Findings include: Record review for Resident #212 revealed an admission date of 05/02/25 and a readmission date of 05/16/25. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, gender identity disorder, and borderline personality disorder. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #212 was cognitively intact. Resident #212 had little interest or pleasure in doing things, feeling down, depressed or hopeless, feeling bad about herself/himself or a failure or have let herself/himself or her/his family down, and had trouble concentrating on things such as reading the newspaper or watching television. Resident #212 used a manual wheelchair, had no impairments of the upper or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure blood sugar results were obtained prior to eating the breakfast meal for Resident #72 and failed to prime the insulin pen prior to administering the insulin injection for residents #72 and #19. This affected two (Residents #19 and #72) observed for blood sugar assessments and insulin administration and had the potential to affect an additional 24 (Resident #2, #5, #16, #17, #21, #23, #24, #25, #29, #34, #44, #48, #51, #53, #55, #62, #67, #68, #69, #83, #211, #212, #262, and #311) identified by the facility as requiring a blood sugar assessment prior to meals and or requiring insulin via insulin pen. The facility census was 111. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 07/27/22. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (DM) with diabetic nephropathy. Review of the care plan dated 07/29/24 revealed Resident #72 had diabetes mellitus. Interventions included diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, pharmacy medical record review and lab requisition review, revealed the facility failed to ensure the physician ordered labs were completed timely for Resident #66. This affected one (Resident #66) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 111. Findings include: Record review for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 04/01/24. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, cerebral infarction, personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremity. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #66 did not receive an anticoagulant. Review of the physician orders for Resident #66 revealed an order for Eliquis (anticoagulant) five milligram (mg) tablet, take one tablet by mouth twice daily, ordered on 04/01/24. Interview on 06/09/25 at 10:50 A.M. with Corporate MDS Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices and or ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was readily available for two residents, Resident #6 and #104 who required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This affected two residents (#6 and #104) of two residents reviewed for EBP and had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 111. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 03/05/20. Diagnoses included attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and dementia. Review of the annual Minimum Daa Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #6 had no impairment to the upper or lower extremities, required set up or clean up assistants with eating and bathing. Review of the care plan dated 05/27/25 revealed Resident #6 had cellulitis of the right lower leg related to abrasion on shin.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure all medications were disposed of in a safe and secure manner. This had the potential to affect an unidentified number of staff and 46 residents (#1, #4, #9, #10, #17, #18, #19, #20, #22, #23, #25, #27, #28, #30, #32, #35, #38, #39, #40, #49, #50, #51, #52, #55, #56, #59, #60, #65, #66, #67, #70, #73, #74, #75, #76, #77, #80, #81, #82, #84, #89, #90, #94, #97, #99, and #100) residing on the third floor of the facility who potentially could have accessed the unsecured medications. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 1:05 P.M. of the medication room on the third-floor revealed a large sharps disposal container on the counter that was approximately one quarter of the way full of an array of multiple different medications. There was no lid on the sharps container. Interview on [DATE] at 1:10 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #709 verified there was a large sharps disposal container in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident #98 was free from misappropriation. This affected one resident (Resident #98) of three residents reviewed. The census was 103. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #98 revealed an admission date of 04/22/22. Diagnoses included blindness, dementia and adjustment disorder. Review of the SRI on 01/29/24 revealed Resident #98 gave his debit card and personal identification number (PIN) to State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #306 on 01/25/24 to purchase some items for him. On 01/28/24 he reported to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #301 he had not received his debit card or items purchased yet. LPN #301 notified LPN #302, manager on call, who reported it to the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator. A thorough investigation was completed including interviews of residents on his unit, witness statements and education on abuse policy. STNA #306 admitted to having used the resident's debit card and said she had yet to drop off…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-30 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information for the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) report to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the third fiscal quarter of 2023. This had the potential to affect all 105 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of [NAME] PBJ Staffing data report revealed facility triggered for low weekend staffing and one star staffing for Quarter Three of the fiscal year 2023. Interview on 11/30/23 at 10:05 A.M. with Administrator revealed he did research with the corporate/home office and determined this was a reporting error. The hours were not added for some agency nursing staff for that period as well as some nursing managers who worked the weekends, which was not included in the corporate PBJ report sent into CMS. On 11/30/23 at 10:11 A.M. the Administrator sent a follow up email to this surveyor confirming that after additional research the Administrator had found the submitter of the PBJ staffing information submitted to CMS did not include the agency staffing and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the medical record, interview with staff and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable water temperature in Resident #75's room and failed to ensure a comfortable temperature in the dining room on floor one. This affected one resident (Resident #75) but had the potential to affect all the resident on the 300 hall unit and affected three residents ( Resident #67, #69 and #74) in the first-floor dining room. The facility census was 105. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, mood disorder. major depressive disorder, pulmonary embolism, convulsions, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, hypersomnia, hypertension, antisocial personality disorder, hemiplegia and COVID-19. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #75 had intact cognition. Observation on 11/29/23 at 8:30 A.M. revealed the water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store flour in a manner to prevent contamination. This had the potential to affect all 105 residents in the facility. The facility census was 105. All residents receive meals from the kitchen. Findings Included: On 11/27/23 at 9:00 A.M. a tour of the kitchen with the Director of Dining Services (DDS) #69 revealed two styrofoam cups in the flour bin. This was verified by DDS #69 at the time of the kitchen tour. A review of the policy titled, Food Safety Requirements that was undated revealed the definition of contamination is the unintended presence of potentially harmful substances including, but not limited to microorganisms, chemicals, or physical objects. It also revealed that food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process. This process begins when food is received from the vendor and ends with delivery of food to the resident. Elements of the process include storage of food in a manner that helps prevent the deterioration or contamination of the food.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review the personnel records for State Tested Nurses Aide (STNA) #70 revealed a hire date of 08/05/22. There was no evidence a tuberculosis test was administered before her hire date for 2023. Review the personnel records for STNA #75 revealed a hire date of 06/09/22. There was no evidence a tuberculosis test was administered before her hire date for 2023. Interview on 11/30/23 at 11:15 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the TB tests were not administered timely. Review of the facility policy titled Tuberculosis Risk Assessment Worksheet dated 03/02/23, revealed screening of employees for TB infection on would occur annually. Based on observation, record review, interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands to prevent possible cross contamination of germs during medication administration for four (Resident #63, Resident #74, Resident #85, and Resident #95) out of six residents observed during medication administration and failed to ensure all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facilities policy review, the facility failed to follow their policy for abuse in regard to allegations of resident to resident abuse. This affected three residents (Residents #19, #48 and #103) of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 07/13/15. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. He required partial to moderate assistance for toileting and hygiene and used a wheelchair to ambulate. Review of the skin observation tool dated 10/17/23 and timed 5:30 A.M. revealed the residents' skin was intact. 2. Review the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 07/25/23. Diagnoses included dementia, psychotic disorder and diabetes. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facilities policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a witnessed incident of Resident to Resident abuse. This affected three Residents (Residents #19, #48 and #103) of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 07/13/15. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. He required partial to moderate assistance for toileting and hygiene and used a wheelchair to ambulate. Review of the skin observation tool dated 10/17/23 and timed 5:30 A.M. revealed the residents' skin was intact. 2. Review the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 07/25/23. Diagnoses included dementia, psychotic disorder and diabetes. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate for one resident (Resident #9) regarding dental status. This affected one resident (Resident #9) of nine reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 07/10/14. Diagnoses included diabetes, dysphagia, heart failure and dementia. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. He required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and hygiene. He required supervision and set up help for eating. He had no broken or missing teeth. Review of the care plan dated 09/29/23 revealed the resident was at risk for oral problems to due some missing teeth. Interventions included a dental consult as needed, monitoring and reporting oral pain as needed and providing the resident with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure anti-embolic stockings (stockings used to prevent swelling or blood clots) were applied as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident #77) of three reviewed. The facility census was 105. Findings include: A review of resident records for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 02/28/22. Pertinent diagnoses included epilepsy, alcohol dependence, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, depression, hemiplegia, impulse disorder, cerebral infarction chronic embolism (blood clot), ileostomy, hypertension (high blood pressure) and bipolar disorder. Review of the November 2023 physician's order revealed Resident #77 had orders that included anti-embolic stockings on in the morning and off in the evening. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 had moderately impaired cognition. On 11/28/23 at 12:00 P.M., an interview with Resident #77 revealed anti-embolic stockings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the medical record, and interviews with staff the facility failed to ensure fall intervention were in place for Resident #26. This affected one resident (Resident #26) of six reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 105. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses alcohol dependence, seizures, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, anemia, psychoactive substance abuse, cerebral infarction, abnormal aortic aneurysm, schizoaffective disorder, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety disorder, depression, dementia, hypertension, COVID-19, mood disorder, and left leg amputation. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had moderately impaired cognition and he required limited assistance of one staff member for transfers. He has had no falls. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #26 had an order for a mat to the floor dated 10/06/23.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facilities policy review, the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis assessments and vitals and weights were obtained as ordered for one resident (Resident #98). This affected one resident (Resident #98) of one review for dialysis services. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #98 revealed an admission date of 08/31/23. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, depression, chronic kidney disease, anemia, diabetes, dementia. and heart failure. Review of the physician's orders for November 2023 revealed an order for pre and post dialysis vitals and weights once per day on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. She required extensive assistance of one person for dressing and hygiene, limited assistance of one person for toileting and supervision of one person for bed mobility and transfers. She was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of the pharmacy recommendation, interview with staff, and review of facilities policy, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendation were addressed and implemented timely. This affected one resident ( Resident #26) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 105. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses alcohol dependence, seizures, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, anemia, psychoactive substance abuse, cerebral infarction, abnormal aortic aneurysm, schizoaffective disorder, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety disorder, depression, dementia, hypertension, COVID-19, mood disorder, and left leg amputation. Review of the annual Minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had moderately impaired cognition and he was administered an anti-psychotic medication seven days a week. Review of the November 2023 physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facilities policy review, the facility failed to ensure nonpharmacological interventions were in place prior to administering as needed (prn) pain medication and failed to ensure parameters were in place to determine which type of pain medication to administer. This affected one resident (Resident #53) of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 01/25/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, diabetes, depression, Absence of left leg below knee, hepatitis and generalized muscle weakness. Review of the physicians orders for November 2023 revealed an order for Norco (an opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) 5-235 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth (po) every 12 hours prn for pain and Tylenol 1000 mg every eight hours as needed for pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facilities policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #97) had a diagnosis for a prescribed antipsychotic. This affected one resident (Resident #97) of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed an admission date of 10/18/23. Diagnoses included depression, anxiety, substance abuse and cardiac arrest. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. He needed partial to moderate assistance with showering, set up assistance for hygiene and was independent and eating. Review of the physicians orders for November 2023 revealed an order for Zyprexa (an antipsychotic medication) 5 milligrams (mg) once per day for depression. Interview on 11/29/23 at 2:44 PM with the Director of Nursing confirmed the resident did not have an appropriate diagnosis for Zyprexa. Review of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facilities policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #63's, Resident #74's and Resident #95's medications were administered as ordered by the physician causing a medication error rate of 45 percent. This affected three ( Resident #63,#74, and #95) out of five residents observed during medications administration. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Resident #63 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, acute kidney failure, uropathy, depression, emphysema, gastroesophageal reflux disease, shortness of breath, quadriplegia, high blood pressure, osteoarthritis, pulmonary nodule, anemia, lumbago with sciatica nerve pain, chronic fatigue, alcohol abuse, psychoactive substance use. Resident #63's plan of care initiated on 09/20/23 indicated interventions to administer medications as ordered by the physician to manage his diagnosis of high blood pressure, gastroesophageal reflux disease, symptoms of dehydration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions. This affected all residents in the facility, as there were no residents identified by the facility as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 101. Findings included: Observations during the kitchen tour with Dietary Manger #600 on 08/16/23 at 10:35 A.M. revealed the following concerns: there were two black, three-tiered carts dirty with food debris and food splashed down the sides of them, the top of the plate warmer was dirty with food debris and dust, two metal carts for the oven pans were dirty with food splashed on them, two drink carts were dirty with dirt and food debris, and three trash cans in the food preparation area with no lids on them. An observation of the walk-in cooler revealed a bag of pepperoni, a quarter of a whole ham wrapped in plastic wrap, a plastic container of shredded cheddar cheese, a plastic container o shredded mozzarella cheese, a plastic container of shredded parmesan cheese, a plastic container of bacon bits and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the observations and interviews with staff, the facility failed to ensure rooms for Resident #7 and #101 and the shower rooms on the third and fourth floors were maintained in a clean, sanitary manner. This affected two residents ( Resident #7 and #101) of three residents reviewed for physical environment in their rooms, and had the potential to affect all 47 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #8, #10, #11,#14, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #23, #24, #27, #29, #30, #37, #38, #40, #41, #45, #49, #50, #53. #55, #61, #63, #64, #68, #69, #71, #72, #74, #75, #76, #77, #78, #81, #86, #87, #89, #92, #94, #97, #99 and #100) on the third floor and all 27 residents ( Resident #4, #5, #13, #22, #25, #26, #28, #31, #33, #34, #39, #42, #48, #51, #52, #57, #58, #59, #73, #79, #88, #90, #91, #93, #96, #98, and #101) on the fourth floor where the shower rooms were located for use by those residents. The facility census was 101. Findings included: 1. Observation of the room of Resident #7 on 08/17/23 at 10:10 AM revealed the floor was dirty with dirt buildup around the perimeter of the room. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, interview with the staff and interview with the family, the facility failed to notify the responsible party/family for Resident #101 with a new order to remove his bed from his room and place his mattress on the floor for safety reasons. This affected one resident ( Resident #101) of three residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 101. Findings included: Review of the medial record revealed Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, aphasia, cerebral edema, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, hemiplegia, pulmonary hypertension, restlessness and agitation and insomnia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #101 had severely impaired cognition. He required total assistance with two staff members for bed mobility, transferring, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, and bathing and with one staff member for eating. He was always incontinent of bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-08-09 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure annual performance evaluations and twelve hours of regular in-service education were completed as required for State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs). This affected four of four STNA personnel files reviewed and had the potential to affect all 95 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for STNA #200 revealed a hire date of 03/17/13 and the last annual performance evaluation was completed on 05/21/20. There was no documentation in the personnel file of a performance evaluation for STNA #200 since 05/21/20, and no documentation of twelve hours of regular in-service education. Review of the personnel file for STNA #201 revealed a hire date of 03/06/18 and the last annual performance evaluation was completed on 05/21/20. There was no documentation in the personnel file of a performance evaluation for STNA #201 since 05/21/20, and no documentation of twelve hours of regular in-service education. Review of the personnel file for STNA #209 revealed a hire date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Nursing Home Resident's [NAME] of Rights, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to respect a resident's right to determine when to go to bed. This affected one (Resident #145) of two residents reviewed for choices (18 residents were interviewed regarding choices). Findings include: Review of Resident #145's medical record revealed diagnoses including fusion of the cervical region of the spine and diffuse traumatic brain injury. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #145 was able to make himself understood and was able to understand others. Resident #145 was assessed with moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #145 required extensive assist with transfers. On 08/02/21 at 3:40 P.M., Resident #145 indicated a few days earlier State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #210 refused to assist him to the bedside commode and placed him in bed against his will. On 08/04/21 at 7:07 P.M., STNA #210 verified after lunch one day over the prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported. This affected one (Resident #145) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of Resident #145's medical record revealed diagnoses including fusion of the cervical region of the spine and diffuse traumatic brain injury. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #145 was able to make himself understood and was able to understand others. Resident #145 was assessed with moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #145 required extensive assist with transfers. On 08/02/21 at 3:40 P.M., Resident #145 alleged a few days earlier State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #210 refused to assist him onto the bedside commode and tossed him in bed against his will. Resident #145 indicated he filed a police report because he considered it abusive. Resident #145 stated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #230 was aware. Resident #145 indicated STNA #210…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and interview the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #145) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living received bathing assistance. The facility identified 81 residents who required assistance with or who were dependent on staff for bathing. Findings include: Review of Resident #145's medical record revealed diagnoses including fusion of the cervical region of the spine and diffuse traumatic brain injury. An admission Minimum Daily Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #145 was able to make himself understood and was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #145 was dependent on staff for bathing. On 07/14/21, an order was written for showers on Wednesday and Saturday on second shift. Review of bathing records indicated Resident #145 received bed baths on 07/15/21, 07/16/21, 07/24/21 and 07/25/21. On 08/02/21 at 3:49 P.M., Resident #145 stated he had only received one shower since his admission on [DATE]. Resident #145 stated he would prefer a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure an activity program was implemented in accordance with a resident's assessment and preferences. This affected one (Resident #59) of two residents reviewed for activities. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, tracheostomy status, congestive heart failure, and bipolar disorder. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #59 was sometimes able to make herself understood and was sometimes able to understand others. Resident #59 was assessed with short and long term memory problems and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The assessment indicated it was very important for Resident #59 to have reading material, listen to music she liked, keep up with the news, do her favorite activities, go outside and get fresh air when weather was good, and participate in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-09 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for foot care were implemented and provided as ordered. This affected one (Resident #36) of one resident reviewed for foot care services. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Interview with Resident #36 on 08/02/21 at 12:51 P.M. revealed no foot care was being completed as ordered by the physician. Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/24/18 with diagnosis that included diabetes mellitus type two. Further review of the medical record including physician's orders revealed on 04/08/21 Resident #36 was ordered foot soaks in warm soapy water for 15 minutes for one week. Review of the treatment administration record (TAR) revealed no evidence the foot soak was transcribed onto the TAR and completed as ordered. Interview with Regional Staff #216 on 08/05/21 at 8:45 A.M. verified foot soaks for Resident #36 were not provided as ordered.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide restorative range of motion services as indicated. This affected two (Residents #69 and #76) of three residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Observation of Resident #69 on 08/02/21 at 10:15 A.M. identified bilateral contractures to the hands and wrists with no evidence of any type of splint device in place. Continued observations identified no splint devices in place. Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/28/16 with diagnoses that include cerebrovascular accident. Further review of the medical record including the State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) Tasks identified Resident #69 was to receive nursing rehabilitation services including active assist range of motion (AROM) to the bilateral upper extremities including hands, fingers, wrists, elbows and shoulders. Further review of the STNA Tasks for the last 30 days from 07/04/21 to 08/03/21 indicated the AROM assistance was provided only on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place as ordered for one (Resident #62) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility also failed to ensure monitoring devices were in place as ordered to prevent unwanted exit from the facility for one (Resident #43) of two residents reviewed for supervision. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/16/18 with diagnoses that include cerebrovascular accident with hemiplegia and hemiparesis. Further review of the medical record revealed a physician's order from 07/27/21 which indicated the use of a low bed for safety following a fall from the resident's bed. Observation of Resident #62 on 08/04/21 at 10:14 A.M. revealed Resident #62 asleep in bed, the bed was observed to be raised approximately two feet off the floor and not in the low position. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #202…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure implementation of physician orders for residents with tracheostomies. This affected two (Residents #20 and #59) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified two residents with tracheostomies. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, heart failure, anxiety disorder, and tracheostomy {A surgically created opening through the front of the neck and into the windpipe (trachea) into which a tracheostomy tube (trache) is placed to maintain breathing status.} A nursing note dated 06/29/21 at 5:30 P.M. indicated Resident #20 pulled her trache out and the registered nurse was unable to replace it. Resident #20 was sent to the emergency room for trache replacement. Resident #20 had a physician order dated 06/30/21 to keep a spare trache (size 4 uncuffed Shiley) at the bedside. On 07/30/21 at 10:48 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #232 confirmed there was no spare trache (size 4 uncuffed Shiley) at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, policy review, and interview the facility failed to maintain infection control practices during tracheostomy care. This affected one (Resident #59) of one resident observed for tracheostomy care. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (below normal level of oxygen in the blood), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and tracheostomy (trache) status {A surgically created opening through the front of the neck and into the windpipe (trachea) into which a tracheostomy tube (trache) is placed to maintain breathing status.} A care plan intervention initiated 08/03/21 indicated Resident #59 was to be suctioned as necessary. During observation of trache care on 08/04/21 at 1:20 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #230 was observed opening a tracheal suctioning kit. A pack of sterile gloves was removed. One glove was donned. The gloved hand was used to reposition flexible tubing lying on the bed and across Resident #59's chest. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure antibiotic assessments were used to ensure appropriate antibiotic use. This affected one (Resident #62) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/16/18 with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident. Further review of the medical record including medication orders revealed antibiotic orders on 03/20/21 for Levaquin (antibiotic) 500 milligram (mg) every day for five days for a toe infection, 04/15/21 Bactrim DS (antibiotic) one every day for 10 days for a toe infection, 05/04/21 Bactrim DS one every day for 10 days for a toe infection and 05/30/21 gentamicin (antibiotic) 120 mg/100 milliliter (ml) intravenous every eight hours for 14 days for a toe infection. Further review of the medical record found no evidence of any type of assessment completed to determine if antibiotic use was appropriate. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 08/04/21 at 8:50 A.M. verified no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DIVINE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARKOVITS, ISAAK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 50% | since 02/01/2020 |
| RICHLAND, ILAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 50% | since 02/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365259. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.