Pearlview Rehab & Wellness Ctr
4426 Homestead Dr, Brunswick, OH 44212 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 68 certified beds · (330) 225-9121 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.8% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 28.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.8% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.0% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.9% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 7.9–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 39.5 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of personnel files, review of the facility's background check log, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy regarding screening potential employees through background and reference checks and maintaining evidence those screenings were completed. This affected all 40 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the personnel file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #220 revealed a hire date of 09/10/25. The personal reference check page contained the name and contact information for the references, however, there was no evidence the references were ever contacted. The unsealed envelope labeled confidential contained one blank sheet of paper and there was no evidence a background check had been completed. CNA #220's employment was terminated on 06/04/26 when law enforcement arrived to the facility and arrested CNA #220 for outstanding warrants. On 06/16/26 at 12:10 P.M., an interview with the Administrator verified CNA #220 did not have a background check completed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespreadRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's self-reported incident (SRI), facility investigation review, review of police reports, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of misappropriation of resident social security numbers. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:Review of the police report dated 06/04/26 at 5:29 P.M. revealed local law enforcement was dispatched to the facility regarding an anonymous tip that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #220 had multiple felony warrants. CNA #220 was arrested at the facility and transported to jail. Review of the facility's self-reported incident (SRI), tracking number 275348, dated 06/04/26 revealed local law enforcement arrived to the facility asking to speak to CNA #220. Police revealed CNA #220 had an outstanding warrant for her arrest, arrested her, and removed her from the grounds. Police also notified the facility of an allegation that CNA #220 was stealing residents' social security numbers. There was no evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that required staff orientation and performance evaluations were completed as part of the competency assessment process. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:Review of the personnel file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #220 revealed a hire date of 09/10/25. There was no evidence of CNA #220 completing an orientation, an initial skills evaluation, a 30-day performance evaluation, or a 90-day performance evaluation. On 06/17/26 at 12:35 P.M., an interview with the Administrator verified the findings in CNA #220's personnel file. The Administrator stated there was a lapse in human resources (HR) staff at the facility until the new HR person was hired in January 2026. This deficiency represents an incidental finding identified during the investigation of Complaint Number 3037008.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and serviced in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents who received food from the kitchen excluding Resident #2 who was identified by the facility as having orders for nothing by mouth. The facility census was 40. Findings include: On 06/15/26 at 8:34 A.M., an observation of the kitchen revealed the following: Reach-in freezer #1 had no visible interior thermometer and there was significant ice build-up within the freezer including on food products. Reach-in freezer #2 had significant ice build-up within the freezer including on food products. The walk-in cooler had a dark colored substance spilled on the floor that was sticky and there were multiple areas of a dark colored fuzzy substance throughout the cooler including by the light fixture, in the corner to the left of the door, two areas above the door, behind the fan, and a line approximately two feet in length on the wall to the right of the door. The reach-in cooler had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to conduct initial tuberculosis testing upon hire for all staff, which had the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene during incontinence care, affecting Resident #39, and failed to ensure staff did not handle ready-to-eat foods with bare hands while assisting Resident #37 with eating. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Review of the personnel files for former Administrator #230, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #220, and Registered Nurse (RN) #232 revealed there was no documented evidence tuberculosis (TB) testing was performed prior to hire. Review of the facility's TB risk assessment, dated 2026, revealed baseline TB skin testing would be performed for healthcare workers, healthcare workers would receive TB testing annually, and TB test records would be maintained by Human Resources (HR). On 06/17/26 at 12:35 P.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of maintenance records, observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in proper working order. This affected all 39 residents who received food from the kitchen (except Resident #2 who was identified as having orders for nothing by mouth). The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the maintenance work orders revealed dietary staff reported the garbage disposal was not working on 07/21/25. The work order was set to completed on 08/29/25. Review of the repair quote dated 03/11/26 revealed the garbage disposal needed replacement. On 06/15/26 at 8:34 A.M., an observation of the kitchen revealed reach-in freezer #1 had significant ice buildup including on food products, reach-in freezer #2 had significant ice buildup including on food products, and the garbage disposal had a cover over it. On 06/15/26 at 9:09 A.M., an interview with Dietary Aide #224 verified the ice buildup in the freezers and the cover on the garbage disposal. Dietary Aide #224 stated the garbage disposal had been broken for a year, and the facility did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility maintenance records, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physical environment was maintained in a safe, sanitary condition. The facility did not address ongoing water intrusion and resulting deterioration of ceiling tiles in multiple resident use and common areas. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the maintenance work orders revealed staff reported a moldy ceiling tile in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 06/30/25 and ceiling tiles were wet and black in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 08/15/25. On 06/15/26 at 11:45 A.M., an observation of the facility revealed multiple ceiling tiles with visible brown colored water damage. In addition, several ceiling tiles had black discoloration including in hallway outside the Administrator's office, in hallway outside the business office, in hallway by room [ROOM NUMBER], and in hallway by room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 06/15/26 at 11:59 A.M., an interview with the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to serve mechanically altered foods at an appropriate texture. This affected one resident (#24) out of one reviewed for food textures and had the potential to affect six additional residents (#6, #19, #20, #25, #27, #39) identified by the facility as receiving pureed texture. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 07/18/24 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, depression, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the speech therapy Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #24 had dysphasia oropharyngeal phase and had recommendations for puree consistency diet. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #24 identified orders for a regular diet with dysphagia pureed texture effective 04/17/26. Review of the nutrition care plan, revised 05/14/26, revealed Resident #24 had the potential for malnutrition and altered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-10 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report, review of staff schedules and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate staffing data was reported to CMS. This had the potential to affect all 31 residents residing in the facility. Findings Included: Review of the CMS PBJ report from 01/01/25 through 03/31/25 revealed the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. Interview on 06/10/25 at 9:28 A.M. with the Administrator revealed Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA)/Activities #315 worked on the floor providing direct (resident) care on 01/18/25 but believed her hours were not coded correctly on the staffing data submitted to CMS, therefore the facility staffing was not reported accurately. The Administrator revealed the facility tried to staff two nurses and two CNAs on every shift unless someone called off and this could possibly explain why the PBJ showed low weekend staffing during the above time period. The Administrator revealed on the weekend of 01/18/25 and 01/19/25 there was only one CNA on night shift with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review, and interview the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices/procedures to prevent the potential spread of Covid-19. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents residing in the facility. (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, 12, #13, #14, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21,#23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #45, #46, #245, and #246). Findings include: 1. Observation on 11/06/23 at 9:33 A.M. revealed five residents (Residents #5, #6, #14, #21, and #39) on the second floor in isolation for Covid-19. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was observed hanging on the doors of the rooms of the residents or in cabinets placed just outside the entrance of each room. There was no signage on or near the residents' doors indicating the type of isolation or what PPE should be donned prior to entering the rooms. Interview on 11/06/23 at 9:33 A.M. with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #525 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the long term care ombudsman was notified of transfers to the hospital for three residents (#8, #30, and #42) of four residents (#2, #8, #30, and #42) reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 39. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an initial admission date of 03/14/23. Diagnoses included pulmonary embolism, major depressive disorder, dementia, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had an unplanned discharge to an acute hospital. Review of the nurses' notes dated 07/21/23 at 4:15 A.M. revealed Resident #8 was found by an aide attempting to get out of bed stating they needed to go to work, when discussing with the resident that she lived at the nursing home she became increasingly confused and difficult to re-direct. Normal baseline was slight confusion. Resident #8 was sent to the emergency room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents requiring assistance with activities of daily living received showers/bathing as scheduled. The affected two of three residents (Resident #23 and Resident #30) reviewed for showers/bathing. The facility census was 39. Findings Included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 02/22/23. Diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia, stage III chronic kidney disease and nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage and seizures. Review of the plan of care dated 02/23/23 revealed Resident #23 had a self-care deficit related to confusion, limited mobility and limited range of motion and required total dependence of two staff for showers twice weekly. Resident #23 was noted to be resistant to care at times. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This affected three residents (#30, #38, and #45) of three residents reviewed for physical environment. The census was 39. Findings include: Interview on 11/06/23 at 9:45 A.M. with Resident #45 revealed no one cleaned his room. Observation at the time of interview revealed the bathroom floor had dirt buildup in the four corners of floor and there was feces in the toilet bowl. There was a buildup of dirt behind the entrance door to Resident #45's room. Observation of Resident #30's room on 11/07/23 at 9:39 A.M. revealed crumbs on the floor under and behind the bed, and near the sink area. Behind the entrance door into Resident #30's room there was a buildup of dirt. In Resident #30's bathroom there was a dirty, dry towel at the base of the pipe of the toilet and on the floor at the base of the toilet there was a tan colored stain. There was also dirt buildup in the four corners of the bathroom floor. Observation on 11/07/23 at 11:54 A.M. revealed Housekeeper (HSK)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of Ohio Departments Enhanced Information Dissemination Collection (EIDC) system, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely report the allegation of physical abuse to the appropriate state agency. This affected one (#16) of three residents reviewed for potential abuse and neglect. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 09/02/16. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/01/23, revealed Resident #16 was rarely understood and required extensive assistance with two staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) except eating required extensive assistance with one staff. Interview on 08/23/23 at 1:30 P.M., with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #350 revealed she reported on 08/15/23 to the Administrator she was told by STNA #341, that on 08/13/23, Nursing Assistant (NA) #329 slapped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, emplyee time sheet review, employee disciplinary review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure all resident records had accurate documentation. This affected one (#45) of six residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The census was 44. Finding include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 08/17/23. Diagnosis included bacterial endocarditis. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for Ampicillin-Sulbactam Sodium (antibiotic) intravenous (IV) every six hours. Keep central line dressing intact. Review of the Medication Administration Report for August 2023 revealed on 08/12/23 Ampicillin-Sulbactam Sodium doses given at 8:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M. and 4:00 P.M., were signed off by the Former Director of Nursing (DON). Review of the Ampicillin-Sulbactam Sodium administration details revealed on 08/12/23 at 8:00 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #313 had signed off the medications and then it was strike out on 08/12/23 at 11:20 A.M. by LPN #313, reason declined order and then was signed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review and review of policy, the facility failed to maintain appropriate hand hygiene during the tracheostomy (trach) care. This affected one (#43) of two residents identified as having a trach. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 01/24/23 and a readmission date of 07/17/23. Diagnoses included diffuse traumatic brain injury, diabetes mellitus, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and hydrocephalus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/21/23, revealed the resident was in a persistent vegetative state. The resident required total dependence with two staff for activities of daily living except eating was total dependence of one staff. Review of the physician's order for August 2023 revealed Resident #43 revealed an order for trach care every shift and as needed. Observation of trach care on 08/28/23 at 5:56 A.M., with Registered Nurse (RN) #340 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #306 revealed RN #340 placed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible for Residents #4, #17, #34, #36, and #40. This affected five (#4, #17, #34, #36, and #40) of 51 residents reviewed for call light placement. Findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation and interview on 11/07/21 at 12:30 P.M. revealed Resident #4 did not have a call light cord attached to the wall. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #108 at the time of observation verified the call light was out of reach and that Resident #4 would be able to use the call light if it was within reach. 2. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure wound treatments for Resident #27 and weekly weights for Resident #21 were consistently completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #27) of one resident reviewed for non pressure related wounds and one (Resident #21) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, congestive heart failure, diabetes and morbid obesity. Review of the plan of care related to actual skin impairment initiated on 02/16/21 indicated she had a wound related to a recurrent abscess on her right thigh. One of the interventions was to provide treatments per the physician's orders. Review of the comprehensive assessment (MDS 3.0) dated 10/01/21 indicated she was alert, oriented and independent in daily decision making ability. She received application of non surgical wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy and procedure the facility failed to ensure oxygen concentrator filters were maintained in a clean manner. This affected six (Residents #4, #17, #27, #32, #36 and #44) of six residents reviewed who used oxygen concentrators. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea and respiratory failure. Review of the physician order dated 01/22/21 indicated to provide oxygen at two liters per minute to keep oxygen saturation levels above 92%. On 11/07/21 at 10:42 A.M. observation of Resident #36's oxygen concentrator revealed there were filters on each side. Both filters were observed with an accumulation of thick white dust and debris. On 11/08/21 at 10:43 A.M. an environmental tour of the facility was conducted with the Administrator. Oxygen concentrators were observed for Residents #4, #17, #27, #32, #36…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-09 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted on a daily basis. This had the potential to affect all 51 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: On 11/07/21 at 8:00 A.M. observation revealed the posted staffing information was dated 11/05/21. Interview with the Receptionist on 11/07/21 at 8:03 A.M. verified the posting was dated 11/05/21. Interview with the Administrator on 11/08/21 at 10:45 A.M. revealed it was the responsibility of the nursing supervisor to post the staffing information on the weekends.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention medical (CDC) guidelines the facility failed to ensure all staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when delivering a lunch tray to Resident #204. This affected Resident #204 and had the potential to affect all 51 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of Resident #204's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed it was in progress. There was no evidence found the resident had been vaccinated for COVID 19. Observation on 11/06/21 at 12:55 P.M. of tray service on the quarantine unit revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #134, who was not wearing any PPE, delivered Resident #204's lunch tray to his room. At the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-28 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 22 residents (Residents #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #8, #11, #12, #13, #15, #17, #19, #23, #29, #30, #31, #34, #37, #38, #39, #43 and #45) were informed, in advance, of proposed treatment and provided the option to choose or decline. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Interview with Resident #17 occurred on 12/27/19 at 2:14 P.M. Resident #17 identified on 12/12/19 a unknown male came into her room told her he was getting her free diabetic shoes and custom molded inserts. Resident #17 revealed, the man then measured her feet and took pictures of them. Resident #17 confirmed she was never asked, prior to this person's arrival if she wished to obtain this service. The interview identified her roommate, Resident #8, whom can not provide any consent, was also measured for these shoes. Interview with the facility Administrator on 12/27/19 at 2:46 P.M. was completed. The interview confirmed the facility could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, medical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing was available to ensure eight residents (Residents #3, #14, #17, #21, #22, #28, #36 and #46) of 48 residents received medications timely on 12/26/19. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 06/05/17, with medical diagnoses including paraplegia, chronic kidney disease, borderline personality, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Lupus, neurogenic bladder, anemia, anxiety, diabetes mellitus and morbid obesity. The record revealed Resident #17 was cognitively intact and able to make her needs know. Interview with Resident #17 occurred on 12/26/19 at 9:42 A.M. and revealed she believed there was not enough staff working in the facility. The resident stated at times she had a difficult time being put to bed when she wanted to be. The resident additionally identified her medications, scheduled for 8:00 A.M. this morning, had not been administered, including her insulin.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #21 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type one diabetes mellitus, history of diabetic foot ulcer, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, lymphedema, hypothyroidism, abnormal glucose, venous insufficiency, hypertension, cellulitis of right lower limb, and chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of unspecified lower extremity. Resident #21 was followed by endocrinology for blood glucose control. Resident #21's physician's order dated 09/25/19 revealed she was ordered insulin regular human (conc) solution, 500 unit per milliliter, inject 145 units subcutaneously one time a day at 8:00 A.M. and inject 65 units subcutaneously one time a day at 11:30 A.M. for type one diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. Review of Resident #21's physician's order dated 12/26/19 revealed per certified nurse practitioner, may administer morning medications late, one time order on this date. Interview on 12/28/19 at 12:00 P.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) revealed although Resident #21's insulin was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #25) of 16 sampled residents/families were invited to participate, on at least a quarterly basis, to plan their care meeting. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of Resident #25's medical record identified admission occurred 01/19/19 with medical diagnosis including dementia, repeated falls and colon cancer. The record identified an initial care planning conference occurred on 01/25/19, which included Resident #25's family. The record lacked any evidence of additional care planning meetings in which the family/resident was invited to participate. The record identified a significant change in condition assessment was completed on 11/13/19 (due to initiation of hospice), a quarterly assessment was completed on 10/28/19 and 07/20/19. The facility was noted to conducted the meetings without family participation. Interview with Resident #25's daughter occurred on 12/27/19 at 1:45 P.M. The interview identified the family had not been invited to participate in any care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide one (Resident #25) of two residents, whom was dependent, with daily shaving. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of Resident #25's medical record identified admission occurred 01/19/19 with medical diagnoses including dementia, repeated falls, colon cancer and anemia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 required extensive assistance of one staff with all activities of daily living (ADL). Review of Resident #25's written plan of care identified he was unable to perform his ADL. The written plan did not evidence the residents preferences to be shaved daily. The plan did not address what the staff should do if the resident refused showers and or shaving. Interview with Resident #25's daughter occurred on 12/27/19 at 1:45 P.M. The interview identified the family had come in several times to visit, and the resident had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #46 received activities to meet his current and past interests. This affected one resident (Resident #46) of one resident reviewed for activities. Findings include: Resident #46 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, dementia and Alzheimer's Disease. Resident #46's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was severely impaired, was totally dependent on staff for transfers and required extensive assistance with locomotion. Resident #46's Activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was a former railroad engineer and was active in his Catholic religion. Resident #46's active comprehensive care plan revealed a focus for alteration in supervised/organized recreation characterized by little or no involvement, and lack of attendance related to preference for independent self-directed activities. Intervention to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medication administration observation, medical record review, review of manufacture's recommendations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure insulin pens were properly utilized to ensure adequate dosing. This affected Resident #38 and had the potential to affect 11 additional residents (Resident #4, #13, #16, #17, #21, #22, #23, #24, #26, #28 and #45) identified as utilizing insulin pens. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Medication administration observation occurred with Registered Nurse (RN) #110 on 12/27/19 at 7:30 A.M. RN #110 prepared medications for Resident #38, which included a Lispro insulin pen and Flovent inhaler (corticosteriod). RN #110 was unable to locate the Lispro insulin pen for Resident #38 and obtained a new one. She set the dial to four units of Lispro insulin and administered the medication to Resident #38. RN #110 did not prime the insulin pen prior to setting and/or giving the dose of insulin to the resident. Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed admission to the facility occurred on 11/26/14 with medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, review of manufacturer's recommendations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #38) of three sampled residents received medications as ordered by the physician. Medication administration observation identified two of 27 medications were not administered in accordance with physician's orders, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.4%. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Medication administration was observed with Registered Nurse (RN) #110 on 12/27/19 at 7:30 A.M. RN #110 prepared medications for Resident #38 which included a Lispro insulin pen and Flovent inhaler (corticosteriod). RN #110 administered two puffs of the Flovent inhaler for Resident #38. RN #110 also administered four units of Lispro insulin subcutaneously (sq). Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed admission to the facility occurred on 11/26/14 with medical diagnoses including diabetes and chronic respiratory failure. The record revealed on 12/26/19 the physician's orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #24 was served the correct portion size of pureed chili. This affected one resident (Resident #24) of one resident observed to be served a pureed diet, with the potential to affect two residents (Resident #24 and Resident #37) who were ordered a pureed diet in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Menu Extension spreadsheet for lunch on 12/27/19, revealed residents on a pureed diet should be served pureed chili with a number six scoop. Review of the Disher Scoop Sizes and Conversions- Chefs Resources form, undated, revealed a number six scoop was 5.33 ounces and a number eight scoop was 4 ounces. Observation on 12/27/19 at 12:10 P.M. revealed [NAME] #104 used a number eight scoop to serve pureed chili to Resident #24. Interview with Dietary Technician #77 at this time confirmed a number eight scoop was used, and the spreadsheet identified a number six scoop. Review of the list of resident diets, provided by the facility, revealed Resident #24 and Resident #37 were ordered a pureed diet.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-06-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain written evidence a background check was completed as required for the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) at the time of hire. This had the potential to affect all 31 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Review of IDON #320's employee file revealed a hire date of 03/25/25. Review of the employee's personnel file revealed no written evidence a background check was completed at the time of hire. Interview on 06/09/25 at 11:39 A.M. with Administrator revealed IDON #320 started as the interim director of nursing on 03/25/25 and it was unknown when her background check was completed (it was to be completed on hire). The Administrator revealed there had been a transition of human resource (HR) director and they realized there was no copy of the IDON's background check. The Administrator stated she asked the IDON if she completed the background check and she stated she did and that she would get a copy of it. However, no copy was provided. The facility followed-up with the agency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DIVINE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROGRESSIVE 3 OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2022 |
| APEX HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2022 |
| DIVINE PROGRESSIVE HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2022 |
| GOLDSTAR CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2022 |
| GOLDSTAR DIVINE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2022 |
| GOLDSTAR OHIO ASSOCIATES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2022 |
| GSFB PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2022 |
| MARKOVITS, ISAAK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2022 |
| RICHLAND, ILAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2022 |
| GOLDNER, DOV | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| PROGRESSIVE 3 MANAGEMENT OH LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365452. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-11-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.