No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hall Of Fame Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

2714 13th Street NW, Canton, OH 44708 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 69 certified beds · (330) 456-2842 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 456-2842 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605) — most recent Mar 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1445 Harrison Ave NW · (234) 214-0671 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2525 13th St NW · (330) 445-1087 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1136 Wertz Ave NW · (330) 452-9351 · Call to confirm hours
Park
13th St NW & Harrison Avenue NW, 2421 Lake Rd Blvd NW · (330) 456-4521 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.7%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms80.1%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.5%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication51.3%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.9%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.7%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.9%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.6%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine65.2%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.05
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
44.4%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 69 beds and averages 46.4 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-26)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions were in place to prevent Resident #30 from developing a pressure ulcer, and failed to ensure the pressure ulcer was comprehensively assessed, properly treated, and interventions were initiated to promote healing. Actual harm occurred on 09/15/22 when Resident #30 who was cognitively impaired, at risk for pressure ulcer development, and required extensive assistance of staff for bed mobility, was found to have a pressure ulcer to the left heel that was first assessed to be a Stage III (full thickness skin break into subcutaneous tissue but does not go into the muscle and bone) ulcer which deteriorated to an unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) without proper assessment, treatment, and interventions implemented. This affected one resident (Resident #30) of two residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) duties were completed by the registered nurse (RN). This had the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:Review of the key personnel list indicated the Director of Nursing (DON) as Registered Nurse (RN) #419. The list indicated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #423 as the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). Review of the personnel file for ADON LPN #423 revealed an employee action form dated 10/21/22 indicating a salary increase effective 10/09/22. Under the comments sections was a handwritten note effective 10/09/22 currently acting DON and all clinical lead, approved by the Administrator. Interview on 03/25/26 at 5:03 P.M. with the Administrator verified he had written the note and stated that it was effective as of 10/09/22 ADON LPN #423 was the acting DON with all clinical leads. The Administrator stated the DON RN #419 was only by title, and ADON LPN #423 did all the DON duties.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Council minutes, observation, staff interview, resident interview and review of the mealtime policy, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a timely manner. This affected five residents (#13, #31, #47, #48, and #56) of five residents reviewed for frequency of meals and had the potential to affect all 47 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (Resident #4) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 48.Findings include:Review of the Resident Council minutes dated 01/08/26 revealed meals were often late.Review of the Resident Council minutes dated 02/05/26 revealed meals were often late.Review of the undated facility mealtimes posted at the second-floor nurses' station revealed the second floor was the second cart and should be delivered to the floor at 11:50 A.M.Observation and interview on 03/23/26 at 12:45 P.M. revealed that lunch trays came to the second floor. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #433 verified that the lunch trays for the residents on second floor were 55 minutes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner and failed to ensure foods were stored in a manner to prevent contamination and spoilage. This had the potential to affect 47 of 48 residents that received food from the facility. The facility identified one resident (Resident #4) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 48.Findings include:Tour of the kitchen on 03/23/26 from 8:10A.M. through 8:40 A.M. revealed [NAME] #451 and Dietary Aide (DA) #452 were serving breakfast. [NAME] #451 and DA #452 had full beards with no beard covering on. The mixer on a floor stand had food splatter on the back splash, white mix on the top of the mixer, and there was dried food splatter on the stand. In the dry storeroom, there was a bag of vanilla wafers that were not labeled and dated. The walk-in refrigerator's gasket was ripped and had mold on it. In the cooking area, the shelf on the stove had grease, dust, and food residue on it. The wall near the microwave had food splatter on it.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all required committee members attended the quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) and quality assessment and assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 48.Findings include:Review of the sign-in sheets for the QAPI/QAA meetings dated 03/20/25 through 02/19/26 revealed the committee met monthly, and there was no documented evidence that the Director of Nursing (DON) attended any of the meetings. Interview of 03/26/26 at 3:37 P.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #423 stated the DON had attended some but not all of the QAA/QAPI meetings. ADON #423 verified the DON's signatures were not on any of the sign-in sheets and stated she could not say which meetings the DON had attended. Review of the undated policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, revealed the QAA committee shall be interdisciplinary and shall consist of the minimum of the DON the medical director or his/her designee, and at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control by not wearing appropriate personal protection equipment (PPE) when care was being provided to Residents #1, #47, #63 and failed to ensure Resident #65 had contact precautions when admitted to the facility. The facility identified eight residents (#1, #4, #15, #19, #21, #56, #63 and #65) on either enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) or contact precautions. The facility census was 48.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/16/23 with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of the vertebra. Review of Resident #47's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/11/26, revealed Resident #47 had no intravenous (IV) medications listed however IV medications had an order date of 03/04/26. Review of Resident #47's physician's orders revealed an order for EBP due to a peripherally inserted central line (PICC) each shift. Review of Resident #47's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #63's code status was accurately reflected in both the hard medical record and the electronic medical record. This affected one of 29 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. The facility census was 48.Findings include:A review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 03/8/26 with diagnoses of pyelonephritis, diabetes mellitus, and major depressive disorder.Review of the physician's orders for March 2026 revealed Resident #63's revealed code status of Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care Arrest (DNR-CCA). A DNR-CCA means a person would receive all emergency and medical care up until the time he or she experiences a cardiac or respiratory arrest, then all lifesaving measures would be stopped. A document on green paper with the words Full Code, was in the hard medical chart on the first page. A full code status means all emergency life saving measures will be provided in the event of respiratory arrest or cardiac arrest. Interview on 03/24/26 at 9:59 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 and Resident #63's antipsychotic medications had appropriate diagnoses/rationale for use. This affected two residents (#7 and #63) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 48.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 09/19/25 with diagnoses of dementia, protein-calorie malnutrition, and diverticulosis.Review of the pharmacy recommendations to the attending physician dated 09/20/25 revealed the pharmacist made a recommendation to evaluate Quetiapine Fumarate (commonly known as Seroquel) for an appropriate diagnosis. The physician addressed the pharmacist recommendations that the benefits outweigh the risks and would cause distress.Review of the pharmacy recommendations to the attending physician dated 12/14/25 revealed the pharmacist made a recommendation to evaluate Seroquel for an appropriate diagnosis and a gradual dose reduction (GDR). The physician addressed the pharmacist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were created in a timely manner for Residents #5 and #6. This affected two residents (#5 and #6) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 48.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 10/31/25. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, acute pulmonary edema, bipolar disorder, morbid obesity, and immunodeficiency. Review of the progress notes dated 03/15/26 at 9:50 A.M. revealed a nurse's note that the nurse contacted the hospital, and Resident #5 had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis. Further review of Resident #5's chart revealed there was no MDS assessment for discharge with return anticipated. Interview on 03/23/26 at 3:52 P.M. with MDS Coordinator (MDSC) #429 verified Resident #5 went to the hospital last week, and she did not create a discharge return anticipated MDS assessment. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 10/31/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure contact isolation was included in the care plans for Resident #01 and #15. This affected two residents (#01 and #15) of 23 resident records reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 48.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 01/05/26 with the diagnosis of sepsis.Review of Resident #01's care plan, dated 01/05/26, revealed no care plan for contact isolation.Review of Resident #01's March 2026 physician orders revealed an order for contact isolation due to a Foley catheter each shift.Review of Resident #01's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a re-entry assessment was in progress.Interview on 03/26/26 at 4:10 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #422 confirmed contact isolation was not included in Resident #01's care plan.Review of the facility's policy for comprehensive care plans, dated 2025, revealed the policy of the facility was to develop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure safe smoking practices affecting Resident #26 and timely smoke breaks affecting Residents #26, #51, #53, #56, and #69. This affected one resident (#26) of one resident reviewed for safe smoking and five residents (#26, #51, #53, #56, and #69) of five residents observed for smoking schedules. The facility census was 48.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an initial admission date of 06/23/24. Diagnoses included hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus, muscles weakness, morbid obesity, and chronic systolic congestive heart failure. Review of the smoking safety screen dated 11/05/25 revealed Resident #26 was safe to smoke with supervision and needed the facility to store lighter and cigarettes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had intact cognition.Review of the current plan of care revealed Resident #26 was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident food allergies were honored. This affected one resident (#63) of one resident reviewed for food preferences. This had the potential to affect 47 residents out of 48 who received meals from the facility kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#4) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 48.Findings include:A review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 03/8/26 with diagnoses of pyelonephritis, diabetes mellitus, and major depressive disorder.Review of the physician's orders for March 2026 revealed Resident #63 received a regular diet.Review of Resident #63's diet ticket revealed that she was on a regular diet had onion, peanut butter and strawberry allergies.Interview on 03/23/26 at 9:45 A.M. with Resident #63 revealed that the kitchen does not honor her preferences.Observation and interview of lunch tray line service on 03/25/26 at 12:31 P.M. revealed that [NAME] #451 portioned beef tips over noodles for Resident #63. The lid was placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #35 and #68 received therapeutic diets as ordered by the physician. This affected two residents (#35 and #63) of three residents (#35, #63, and #68) reviewed therapeutic diets. The facility census was 48.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date on 07/13/21 with diagnoses to schizophrenia, bipolar, and diabetes mellitus.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/02/26, revealed Resident #35 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) except for eating, Resident #35 required set up assistance only.Review of the physician's orders for March 2026 revealed Resident #35 received a regular diet, dysphagia mechanical soft (Dys Mech) texture and regular fluid consistency diet.Observation of lunch tray line service on 03/25/26 at 12:00 P.M. revealed [NAME] #451 portioned regular textured beef tips over noodles for Resident #35. The lid was placed on top of the plate and put…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment. This affected three residents (#9, #10, and #15) of six residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 48.Findings include:1. Observation on 03/23/36 at 10:42 A.M. of Resident #9's room revealed a hole in the bathroom door. Interview at this time with Housekeeper (HSK) #429 verified the observation. 2. Observation on 03/23/26 at 11:19 A.M. of Resident #15's room revealed a urinal and a pair of scissors were observed on the floor. Interview at this time with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #422 verified the observation. 3. Observation on 03/23/26 at 2:08 P.M. of Resident #10's room revealed long deep gash in the lower part of the bathroom door, and there was a large missing chunk on the rim on trash bin. Interview on 03/23/26 at 3:39 P.M. of Resident #10's room with Director of Maintenance (DOM) #428 verified the observation. Review of the undated policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment revealed housekeeping and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to serve foods in a manner to prevent contamination, failed to have a sufficient supply of foods in case of emergency, and failed to ensure expired foods were discarded timely. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents in the facility.Findings include:1.On 12/03/25 from 11:25 A.M. to 12:11 P.M., an observation of the lunch meal tray line service revealed [NAME] #146 was wearing gloves while plating foods for the lunch meal. [NAME] #146 used his gloved hands to handle all serving utensils, to hold the baked potatoes on each plate as he cut them open, he used his gloved fingers to open each baked potato after he cut it, and he used his gloved fingers to move and position the meat and creamed spinach after he put those items on the plates. [NAME] #146 did not change or dispose of his soiled gloves at any point during the observed meal service. At 11:36 A.M., Regional Dietary Director #126 told [NAME] #146 to use tongs when handling the baked potatoes. At 11:39 A.M., [NAME] #146 obtained a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment. This affected one resident (#21) and had the potential to affect twenty five residents (#5, #6, #8, #9, #13, #14, #15, #16, #20, #21, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #33, #37, #38, #44, #45 and #47) who resided on the second floor. The facility census was 45. Findings include:Observation on 12/03/25 at 10:01 A.M. revealed Resident #21's bathroom had a large area of what appeared to be mold or mildew underneath his bathroom sink. Resident #21 was not present in his room during observation.Observation of shower room located on the second floor on 12/03/25 at 10:34 A.M. with Housekeeper #137 revealed a large hole behind the toilet with exposed pipes and a large hole in the ceiling also with exposed pipes. Further observation revealed toilet in shower room had a large amount of dried stool inside the bowl and stool on the outside of bowl and lid. Interview with Housekeeper #137 at time of observation confirmed the observation and Housekeeper #137 stated the water may have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the activities calendar, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide activities to meet the needs and interests of all residents in the facility. This affected three residents (#2, #16, and #40) of six interviewed regarding activities. The facility census was 45.Findings include:Review of the facility's activities calendar for December 2025 revealed the planned activities were repetitive, no activities were provided later than 3:00 P.M., and staff led activities on the weekends and on holidays were lacking. The following were the activities listed on the calendar for December 2025:-On Mondays 12/01/25, 12/08/25, 12/15/25, 12/22/25, and 12/29/25, the scheduled activities were True or False at 10:45 A.M. and Crafts at 2:00 P.M. No other activities were planned for Mondays in December.-On Tuesdays 12/02/25, 12/09/25, 12/16/25, 12/23/25, and 12/30/25, the scheduled activities were Book Club at 1:00 P.M. and Bingo at 2:00 P.M. No other activities were planned for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate foot care had been provided. This affected one resident (#45) of two reviewed for foot care. The facility census was 45.Findings include:Review of Resident #45's medical records revealed an admission date of 07/01/16. Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, aphasia (difficulty speaking) and cognitive deficits.Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had no cognition score due to being rarely understood. Resident #45 was independent with toileting and required set up assistance with bathing.Review of care plan dated 11/10/25 revealed Resident #45 had self care deficits related to impaired cognition and had been combative when trying to trim facial hair. Interventions included encourage resident to participate to fullest extent possible and reapproach when resistive to care. Resident #45 had behaviors that included yelling out and physical behaviors when she did not want to participate in task.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure social services staff was adequately trained and performed duties as required. This affected one resident (#45) of three reviewed for social services duties. The facility census was 45. Findings include:Review of Resident #45's medical records revealed an admission date of 07/01/16. Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, aphasia (difficulty speaking) and cognitive deficits.Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had no cognition score due to being rarely understood. Resident #45 was independent with toileting and required set up assistance with bathing.Review of care plan dated 11/10/25 revealed Resident #45 had self care deficits related to impaired cognition and had been combative when trying to trim facial hair. Interventions included encourage resident to participate to fullest extent possible and reapproach when resistive to care. Resident #45 had behaviors that included yelling out and physical behaviors when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure supplemental oxygen delivery devices were changed weekly and stored properly. This affected three residents (Residents #12, #24 and #28) of three residents reviewed for supplemental oxygen use. The facility identified 10 residents currently utilizing supplemental oxygen (Residents #4, #11, #12, #14, #22, #24, #28, #30, #34 and #37). Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, congestive heart failure and hypertension. Physician's orders on [DATE] indicated the use of supplemental oxygen at two liters per minute (lpm) per nasal canula by oxygen concentrator. Additional orders indicated to change nasal canula every night shift on Sunday. An additional order on [DATE] identified the use of DuoNeb (aerosolized medication for shortness of breath) 0.5-2.5 milligrams (mg) per milliliter (ml) via nebulizer every six…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility policy and review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program to prevent the potential growth of legionella as required. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain infection control during medication administration for one resident (Resident #31) out of two residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 38. Findings include: 1. Review of available facility documentation relative to legionella revealed the CDC toolkit titled, Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth and Spread in Buildings, dated 06/05/17. The documentation included a section, Identifying Buildings at Increased Risk, which instructed staff to survey the building or property to determine if they needed a water management program to reduce the risk of Legionella growth and spread and this section was blank and not filled out. There was no attached water management diagram and no water management plan written for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure smoking assessments were completed. This affected four (Residents #15, #35, #38 and #192) of 12 residents who smoked at the facility. The facility census was 38. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 07/31/21 with diagnoses including vascular dementia, history of traumatic brain injury and nicotine dependence. Review of Resident #15's assessments revealed his last smoking safety screen was completed on 05/23/23. At that time, Resident #15 was safe to smoke with supervision. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was moderately cognitively impaired. Observation on 08/12/24 at 10:00 A.M. revealed Resident #15 smoking in the designated smoking area with staff. Interview on 08/14/24 at 12:15 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #523 verified a smoking assessment had not been completed quarterly and was last completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were present in the electronic chart. This affected one (Resident #37) of 16 (Residents #3, #4, #5, #10, #15, #19, #20, #23, #25, #26, #30, #35, #37, #38, #191, and #192) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 38. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 06/20/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to type II diabetes with ketoacidosis, dementia, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, and Alzheimer's dementia. Review of the physician's orders located in the electronic medical record for Resident #37 revealed no evidence of an order for advance directives. Review of the admission packet which included the baseline care plan dated 6/20/24 for Resident #37 revealed the code status was Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNR CCA). Interview on 08/13/24 at 8:50 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the DNR CCA was signed and in a pile of unfiled papers and was not in the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was created related to behavioral health needs. This affected one (Resident #192) of nineteen residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 38. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #192 revealed an admission date of 07/31/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to rhabdomyolysis (a breakdown of muscle tissue that releases a damaging protein into the blood) acute kidney failure, anxiety disorder, other psychoactive substance abuse and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #192 revealed he was cognitively intact, was noted to be feeling down, depressed, little interest in doing things, trouble falling asleep, tired, and had little energy seven to eleven days of the last fourteen days during the assessment period. Resident #192's Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score of 10 indicated moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to adequately monitor residents on anti-anxiety medications. This affected one resident (#10) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 38. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/28/23 and diagnoses including anxiety, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, depression, falls, hypertension and suicidal ideations. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact and received anti-psychotic, anti-depressant and anti-anxiety medications as well as a diuretic. Review of Resident #10's physician's orders as of 08/15/24 revealed an order dated 11/09/23 for Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) oral tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg) give by mouth twice a day for anxiety. No orders were in place to monitor side effects relative to Resident #10's anti-anxiety medication. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation for resident refrigerators for two residents (Residents #9 and #17) of eight (Residents #9, #14, #15, #16, #17, #28, #34 and #36) reviewed for in room refrigerators. The facility census was 38. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/11/18. Diagnoses included but were not limited to chronic congestive heart failure, encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, type II diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, and dementia with behaviors. Review of the 07/01/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #9 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 01/10/18. Diagnoses included but were not limited to chronic and mild intellectual disabilities. Review of the 05/29/24 MDS 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #17 had severe cognitive impairment. Observations or resident room refrigerators on 08/14/24 at 3:19 P.M. with Registered Dietitian (RD) #564 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate record. This affected one resident (#10) of 19 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 38. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/28/23 and diagnoses including anxiety, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, depression, falls, hypertension and suicidal ideations. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact and received routine antipsychotic medications. Review of a pharmacy recommendation dated 12/01/23 revealed Resident #10 received Abilify (antipsychotic) which could cause involuntary movements but an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) or other appropriate assessment was not documented in the medical record within the previous six months. Review of a pharmacy recommendation dated 06/03/24 revealed Resident #10 received Geodon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and sanitary. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents that received meals from the facility. No residents were identified as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 40. Findings Include: Tour of the dietary department with [NAME] #239 on 02/23/24 from 7:15 A.M. through 7:25 A.M. revealed that Dietary Aide #262 was not wearing a hair restraint while in the kitchen. There was a large hole in the wall under the prep sink. [NAME] #239 stated that the leak was just fixed yesterday, but they did not patch the hole. Under the dish machine, there were missing tiles along the wall, mold along the baseboard, and garbage debris on the floor. The walk-in freezer located in the hallway had black mold on the curtain strips and along the floor and wall in the corner of the freezer. This was verified by [NAME] #239 at the time of the observation. Interview on 02/23/24 at 10:40 A.M. with Dietary Manager #228 verified the kitchen findings from earlier in the day and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was working in a safe operating condition. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 02/23/2024 during the facility tour between 8:00 A.M. to 10:45 A.M with Maintenance Director (MD) #209 revealed the following: • The toilet in room [ROOM NUMBER] had a leak that followed pipes and channels down causing leaks on the first floor and basement. Maintenance Director #208 stated the leak was repaired on 02/22/24. • In the basement there was a clean linen room that had a current domestic water leak with five ceiling tiles missing. • The supply closet next to the basement linen room had visible signs of domestic water leaks. • There were visible signs of domestic water line leaks to include stained tiles and two ceiling tiles missing in the hallway near dialysis storage. • There were visible signs of domestic water leaks to include multiple water-stained tiles and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of cleaning schedules, and interview the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment for Residents #1, #3, #7, #9, #10, and #16. This affected six residents (#1, #3, #7, #9, #10, #16) and the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. Finding Include: An observation on 02/23/24 at 9:58 A.M. revealed Resident #7's wheelchair was soiled. The wheelchair had dried food spills, dust and crumbs on the seat cushion, footrests, on wheels and the arm rests. Interview with Activity Director #241 confirmed the soiled wheelchair at the time of the observation. An environmental tour on 02/23/24 from 11:04 A.M. through 11:15 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the following: • Resident #10's room had a urine odor, there was a bath sheet along the wall behind the toilet, and the bathroom floor was sticky. • Resident #9's privacy curtain was stained and there was mold in the bathroom. • Resident #16's privacy curtain was stained, the toilet had a red…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to Resident #10 was treated in a dignified manner. This affected one resident (#10) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility identified 12 residents (#3, #4, #8, #10, #11, #13, #15, #16, #25, #30, #34, and #39) as smokers. The facility census was 40. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and tobacco use. Review of Resident #10's care plan dated 12/08/22 with a revision date of 12/14/22 revealed Resident #10 is a smoker. Interventions included but were not limited to instructing the resident about the facility policy on smoking, location, times, safety concerns. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact and was independent for activities of daily living (ADL). Review of Resident #10's progress notes from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #34's urine specimens were sent to the laboratory and the results of the laboratory testing were acted upon to timely treat Resident #34's urinary tract infection. This finding affected one (Resident #34) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTIs). Findings include: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia, cerebral infarction and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #34's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #34's progress note dated 07/13/23 at 4:42 P.M. authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #808 indicated the resident reported issues with urinary frequency and denied pain. A urine was sent for a urinalysis (UA) lab test to rule out a UTI. Review of Resident #34's laboratory form dated 07/13/23 at 4:56 P.M. indicated the sample was canceled on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure trash was properly contained on the facility grounds. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents currently residing in the building. Findings include: An observation with the Administrator on 04/26/23 at 9:23 A.M. of the grounds around the parking lot and fence line revealed styrofoam cups, used surgical masks, water bottles, empty beer cases, and stray socks. The Administrator explained there were tarps down along the fence line to smother the weeds so they can lay mulch down, but he did confirm there was a lot of refuse along the fence. An interview on 04/26/23 at 9:23 A.M. with the Administrator verified the facility did not contain their garbage around the facility grounds. Review of the facility policy titled Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, undated, indicated areas surrounding dumpsters shall be kept clean so that accumulation of debris and insect/rodent attractions are minimized.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe discarding of cigarettes, and failed to ensure Resident #40 had his physician ordered soft helmet while up in the wheelchair. This finding had the potential to affect seventeen residents (Residents #5, #6, #11, #12, #13, #15, #16, #17, #19, #21, #26, #27, #28, #34, #45, #46 and #47) the facility identified as smokers, and one resident ( Resident #40) of four reviewed for accidents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/24/23 at 4:05 P.M. with Activity Director #802 revealed the smoking patio had greater than thirty cigarette butts on the cement portion of the patio and cigarette butts lying in the rocks surrounding the cement patio. A fire proof receptacle was located on the patio and two fire proof ash trays were located on the tables on the patio. Interview on 04/24/23 at 4:10 P.M. with Activity Director #802 confirmed the patio had a large amount of cigarette butts lying on the grounds. She stated the facility was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% (percent). A total of 28 medications were administered with four errors for a medication error rate of 14.29%. The finding affected four (Residents #11, #25, #43, and #47) of four residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with type two diabetes, muscle weakness and depression. Review of Resident #47's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/23/23 for Lispro (fast acting insulin) inject 18 units subcutaneously (SQ) before meals for diabetes. Observation on 04/24/23 at 4:44 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #826 of Resident #47's morning medication administration revealed she checked the resident's blood sugar using a glucometer blood sugar machine with a result of 144. She then administered the Lispro fast acting insulin to the resident. Further observation revealed the resident was in bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable, homelike environment. This finding affected three (Residents #27, #33 and #40) of 47 residents residing in the facility observed for environment. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/24/23 at 11:58 A.M. with Maintenance Director #818 revealed Resident #33's bathroom door had a large hole in it; the upper right side of the wall had wires hanging out of the wall where the light fixture was removed; the floor appeared scuffed and blackened; and the bathroom wall had several holes below the mirror and above the sink. Interview on 04/24/23 at 12:00 P.M. with Maintenance Director #818 confirmed Resident #33's room was not maintained in good repair and in a clean and sanitary manner. 2. Observation on 04/24/23 at 12:02 P.M. with Maintenance Director #818 revealed Resident #27's phone jack plate was out of the wall and hanging down near the floor causing a hole in the wall and wires to be exposed. A phone cord was observed to be plugged into the phone jack plate which was hanging from the wall and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-01 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record and interview with staff, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31 was properly assessed to ensure the resident was free from physical restraint. This affected one resident (Resident #31) of one reviewed for physical restraints. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anorexia, fatigue, dementia, repeated falls, hypertension and COVID-19. Review of the plan of care dated 07/09/19 revealed Resident #31 was at risk for fall related injury and falls related to weakness, dementia, history of falls, impaired mobility, chooses not to use a walker, incontinence of bowel and bladder, impaired range of motion to the right shoulder. Interventions included to be up in the Broda chair with self releasing seatbelt when not in wheelchair and self release seatbelt in applied in the wheelchair. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, shower sheet review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #36 who was dependent on staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) was shaved per his preference. This affected one resident (Resident #36) of two resident reviewed for (ADL). Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Guillain-Barre syndrome, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, cerebral infarction, vitamin B12 deficiency, anemia, seizures, mild cognitive impairment, hypertension, and weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had moderately impaired cognition. He required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Review of the progress notes from 02/24/23 through 04/25/23 revealed no documentation Resident #36 refused to be shaved. Review of the shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility did not ensure medications were properly stored in the second-floor medication cart. This affected six residents (Resident #5, #13, #16, #43, #44 and #100) and had the potential to affect the other 15 residents (Resident #2, #15, #25, #28, #30, #40, #46, #101, #102, #104, #105, #106, #107, #108 and #152) whose medications were stored in the second-floor medication cart. The facility census was 48. Findings included: Observation of the medication administration on 06/05/23 at 9:15 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) # 200 revealed in the top drawer of the second-floor medication cart there were six, individual plastic medication cups each containing loose pills and did not have appropriate instructions nor labels for each medication because the pills had been removed from the original packaging. Each plastic medication cup was marked with the first names of six residents who RN #200 identified as Residents #5, #13, #16, #43, #44 and #100. Resident #43's cup had eight pills, Resident #44's cup had seven pills, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-01 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Resident #40 had physician ordered adaptive devices to assist with meals. This affected one resident (Resident #40) of three reviewed for nutrition. Finding include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include cerebral infarction, hemiplegia of the left side, acute respiratory failure, intracerebral hemorrhage, schizoaffective disorder, cannabis use, cocaine abuse, viral hepatitis C, viral hepatitis B, malignant neoplasm prostate, major depressive disorder, hypertensive urgency, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and COVID-19. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance for activity of daily living. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #40 had an order for a regular diet, double entrees, sectioned plate and handled cup dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the ice machine in the kitchen and the refrigerator on the second floor were in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents currently residing in the building. Findings include: 1. An observation on 04/26/23 at 11:25 A.M. with Dietary Manager #812 revealed mildew and a red substance inside the ice machine. Dietary Manager #812 confirmed the mildew and a red substance inside the ice machine. He stated he would clean it before the end of shift. Another observation on 04/26/23 at 2:40 P.M. with Dietary Aide (DA) #811 revealed the inside of the ice machine still had mildew and a red substance. DA #811 cleaned it with a clean washcloth. Interview on 04/26/23 at 2:40 P.M. with DA #811 revealed the inside of the ice machine still had mildew and a red substance. Review of facility policy titled Ice Machine, dated 04/2010, indicated ice machines shall be free of rust and mildew at all times. 2. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-03-26 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the daily nursing staff information was posted. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:Observations on 03/24/26 revealed the daily nursing staff information was not posted. Interview on 03/24/26 at 10:01 A.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #423 stated the posted daily nursing information was usually kept at the receptionist desk and verified she had not put it up.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DIVINE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DHM OH THREE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2020
MARKOVITS, ISAAKIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 12/01/2020
RICHLAND, ILANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER50%since 12/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-23.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 42%Medicare 0%Other / private 58%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$324per resident / day
operating cost
$9,838per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$262per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365291. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next