Divine Rehabilitation And Nursing At Sylvania
5757 Whiteford Rd, Sylvania, OH 43560 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (419) 882-1875 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (85) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $193,489 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.3% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.3% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.7% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.4% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.2% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.6% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.7% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 35.8% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 48% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 5.9–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 76.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.23 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 65.1 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
85 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 71 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, review of hospital medical records, review of the emergency department record, review of the Abuse/Neglect policy and procedure, review of the Wound Treatment Management policy, review of the Skin Assessment policy, resident interview, Medical Director interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #59, who was admitted to the facility on hospice care, was free from a situation of neglect when facility staff failed to provide ongoing wound assessments, care and services to prevent a significant decline in a wound, and notification to the physician when there was a decline in the wound. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm with negative health outcomes when emergency services were called for Resident #59 on 03/22/24 due to a deteriorating mental status and Hospice Nurse #215 checked the left leg wound and it was getting worse. Consequently, Resident #59 required an inpatient hospital admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-04 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of the facility investigation, review of a personnel file, review of an emergency medical services (EMS) run report, review of the facility's policy for Emergency Procedure - Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, review of the American Heart Association Journal, review of a job description for Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and review of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certifications, the facility failed to timely initiate CPR for one resident (Resident #05) found unresponsive, without a pulse or blood pressure, and who was identified as a Full Code status. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm, and/or death when Resident #05 did not receive timely CPR after she was discovered with no pulse or blood pressure. This affected one (#05) of three residents (#05, #06, #07) who expired unexpectedly at the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure five [LPNs #101, #123, #134, #141, and Registered Nurse (RN) #138] of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews with facility staff and the wound physician, review of the medical record, review of the guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's skin impairment was identified timely and a treatment initiated. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #68 on 01/30/25 when the facility failed to assess a resident's wound and obtain physician orders for wound treatments resulting in Resident #68 developing an unstageable pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and/or eschar in the wound bed) requiring debridement. This affected one (#68) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified five residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 75. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed Resident #68 had an admission date of 08/19/24 and a readmission date of 01/30/25. Diagnoses included dementia, heart failure, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, Self-Reported Incident review, hospital record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent an incident of resident-to-resident abuse with injury. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #23 was found on top of Resident #12, punching him and bit the tip of Resident #12's finger off. Subsequently, requiring Resident #12 to have surgical interventions to reattach the fingertip, pain medication and antibiotic therapy. This affected one (Resident #12) of three resident reviewed for potential abuse. The facility census was 92. Findings included: Review of Self-Reported Incident Number 229152 dated 09/14/23 revealed both patients (Resident #12 and Resident #23) were roommates and resided in the memory care unit. Both were in their room that morning. A nurse aid heard a bang sound and walked into their room to find Resident #23 sitting on top of Resident #12. Resident #23 had noticeably bitten Resident #12's right pinkie finger tip off. The nurse removed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure all safety injury prevention interventions were in place as care planned for residents identified at risk for falls. This affected one (#35) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety, muscle spasm, tremor, altered mental status, weakness, seizures, and schizophrenia. Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was at risk for falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was cognitively impaired. Resident #35 was dependent on assistance from staff for the activities of daily living. Review of the plan of care, revised 05/12/25, revealed Resident #35 was at risk for falls. Interventions included enabler bars…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were conducted quarterly for the resident and/or resident representative. This affected six (#14, #18, #43, #49, #58 and #60) of seven residents reviewed for care plan conferences. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included injury at T1 level of thoracic spinal cord, paralytic syndrome, diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, paraplegia, major depressive disorder, and heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the care plan conferences, from 01/01/24 to 03/04/25, revealed Resident #14 had two care conferences on 02/05/24 and 12/25/24. Interview on 03/05/25 at 8:35 A.M. with Social Services #401 verified Resident #14 had only two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor effectiveness of medications utilized to manage the resident's mood and behavior. This affected five of five residents (#10, #15, #26, #34, and #45) reviewed for unnecessary medications in a facility census of 75. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #26 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, borderline personality disorder, major depression disorder, and insomnia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had intact cognition, no behaviors, and received antianxiety, antidepressant, antibiotic, hypoglycemic, and anticonvulsant medications. Review of the physician orders noted Resident #26 to receive the following medications: 03/03/25 venlafaxine extended release 75 milligrams (mg) once daily for major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, 02/24/25 trazodone 175 mg at bedtime…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff hand sanitized between serving resident's meals. This affected four (#1, #33, #44, and #45) of 26 residents reviewed for dining services. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Observation on 03/03/25 at 11:24 A.M. revealed meal trays delivered to the 200 hall. Unit Manager Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #390 was observed passing the meal tray to Resident #44 without prior hand sanitizing. LPN #390 touched the bedside table and used cup then placed the meal tray on the bedside table. LPN #390 did not hand sanitize then passed the meal tray to Resident #45. LPN #390 was observed adjusting the bedside table and setting up the meal tray. LPN #390 was observed to not hand sanitize then entered Resident #1 and Resident #33's room with two meal trays and provided the meal tray. LPN #390 exited without hand sanitizing. Interview on 03/03/25 at 11:33 P.M. with LPN #390 verified she did not complete hand sanitizing between serving the resident's meal trays to their room.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff and resident interview, review of a job description, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and functional environment for the residents. This affected seven (#2, #9, #12, #29, #39, #70, and #72) of thirteen residents reviewed for physical environment. Findings include: 1. Observation on 03/04/25 at 11:07 A.M. of Resident #9's room revealed the blinds on the window were broken. Interview on 03/04/25 at 3:07 P.M. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #375 verified the broken window blinds for Resident #9. Interview on 03/05/25 at 1:38 P.M. with Resident #9 stated she would prefer her blinds to be repaired. 2. Observation on 03/04/25 at 11:10 A.M. revealed Resident #72 had broken window blinds. There gloves placed in the holes of window blinds. Interview on 03/04/25 at 3:07 P.M. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #375 verified the broken window blinds for Resident #72. Interview on 03/05/25 at 1:34 P.M. with Resident #72 stated she had placed the gloves in the window because she does not like the sun coming through the window. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner. This affected one (#31) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included polyosteoarthritis, dementia, and presence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage device. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/29/25, revealed Resident #31 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #31 required set-up or clean-up assistance with eating. Review of the most recent care plan revealed Resident #31 required assistance with activities of daily living and needs supervision and set up assistance with all meals. Observation on 03/05/25 at 8:11 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #353 standing over Resident #31 while in bed providing him a bite of a banana and two spoonfuls of yogurt. Interview on 03/05/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure call lights were accessible to residents. This affected two (#49 and #70) of two residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, neurocognitive disorders with lewy bodies, dementia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the care plan, revised 07/04/24, revealed Resident #49 was at risk for falls due to gait/balance problems, Parkinson's disease, dementia with lewy body, arthritis, and required assistance with transfers and incontinence. Interventions include to educate the resident on the use of walker and call light and to reinforce the resident to call for assistance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/30/24, revealed Resident #49 was moderately cognitively impaired and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely access to medical records as requested. This affected one (#26) of 24 residents reviewed for medical record access in a facility census of 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed the was resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, borderline personality disorder, and insomnia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had intact cognition, and had no behaviors recorded. On 03/03/25 at 11:19 A.M., an interview with Resident #26 revealed he was experiencing dental pain and concerns. Resident #26 had requested access and copies of dental information contained in his medical record. Resident #26 indicated the verbal request was made to the Director of Nursing (DON) approximately two weeks ago and no access had been provided. Interview with the DON on 03/04/25 at 11:32 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) were provided with adequate assistance with grooming and hygiene. This affected three (#14, #42 and #60) of 24 residents reviewed for ADL. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 07/11/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, acute and chronic respiratory failure, depression, lymphedema, congestive heart failure, and anxiety disorder. On 07/23/24, a nursing plan of care was implemented to address Resident #42's ADL self-care performance deficit related to activity intolerance, shortness of breath with exertion, morbid obesity, heart failure, and unable to reach all body parts. Interventions included Resident #42 required physical assistance of staff with bathing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, and physician and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments and edema management equipment were implemented in accordance with physician orders. This affected two (Residents #42 and #44) of two residents reviewed with skin conditions in a facility census of 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, type II diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and right and left lower leg contracture. On 11/08/24, a nursing plan of care was developed to address Resident #44's behavior of picking at skin causing numerous scabbed area on both arms and upper chest. Interventions included the following: Apply any treatment per orders and monitor effectiveness. Monitor/document/report scabbed areas for signs and symptoms of infection (redness, drainage, swelling, pain). Refer to wound care as needed. Review of the Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 71 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure range of motion exercises were provided as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#44) of one resident reviewed for contracture management in a facility census of 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, type II diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, right and left lower leg contracture, and adjustment disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 had intact cognition, had bilateral lower extremity range of motion impairments, and dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living (ADL). On 04/22/24, a physician order was initiated to address Resident #44's contractures of the bilateral lower extremities. The physician ordered to provide gentle range of motion with all cares, two times a day related to contrature of muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 0Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of hospital report, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely report a fall and monitor a resident status post fall and failed to ensure a resident's fall interventions were in place for a resident at risk for falls. This affected two (#18 and #68) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, cognitive communication deficit, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, major depressive disorder recurrent, hypothyroidism, and essential hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/03/25, revealed Resident #18 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #18 required partial/moderate assistance with toileting and had a history of falls. Review of the most recent care plan revealed Resident #18 was at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure water was readily available for proper hydration. This affected one (#20) of two residents reviewed for hydration. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission of 09/24/24. Diagnoses included aphasia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had severe cognitive impairment and required substantial assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation on 03/03/25 at 11:14 A.M. revealed Resident #20 was sitting in his geriatric chair at the nurse's station. Resident #20 had visible creases in his tongue were observed. There was no access to water present during this time. Observation on 03/04/25 at 11:30 A.M. revealed Resident #20 was in the memory care dining room in his geriatric chair, independently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was maintained and applied as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#42) of two residents reviewed for respiratory services in a facility census of 75. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, morbid obesity, acute and chronic respiratory failure, shortness of breath, and congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had intact cognition, had no behaviors or refusal of care, required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). and received oxygen therapy. On 10/02/24, physician orders included Auto C-Pap settings 8-20 cmH2O with full facemask and nasal mask with four liters (L) oxygen bled in, patient to wear at bedtime (HS) and with naps for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of a contract, the facility failed to document communication and assessments before and after dialysis, failed to monitor fluid intake and output, and monitor the resident's dialysis access port. This affected one (#75) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified one resident as receiving dialysis services. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 02/13/25. Diagnoses included bilateral pleural effusion, and end stage chronic kidney disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #75 had intact cognition. Review of the care plan for dialysis, last revised 03/03/25, revealed Resident #75 attended dialysis three times per week on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Interventions included monitoring a fluid restriction of 1,500 milliliters (ml) per day and monitor fluid intake and output, and monitor the dialysis access…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's prescribed pain medication was available to administer as physician ordered. This affected one (#60) of three residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #60 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia affecting left dominant side, acute cholecystitis, and chronic systolic congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/23/25, revealed Resident #60 was cognitively intact and received scheduled and as needed pain medication. Review of the physician order, dated 11/26/24, revealed an order for tramadol oral tablet 50 milligram (mg) with instructions to give 50 mg by mouth every six hours for pain. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated March 2025, revealed Resident #60 did not receive the physician order for tramadol four times on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of pharmacy recommendations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a physician responded timely to pharmacy recommendations. This affected three (#10, #15, #34) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 75. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 had an admission date of 11/05/14. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depressive disorder, anxiety and osteoarthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had intact cognition. Review of pharmacy recommendations dated 04/23/24, 09/09/24, 11/25/24, and 01/23/25 revealed Resident #15 received Alendronate for the treatment of bone health but was not receiving a calcium supplement. The pharmacist made the same recommendation on 04/23/24, 09/09/24, 11/25/24, and 01/23/25 to initiate calcium carbonate 600 milligrams (mg)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician's orders resulting in a medication error rate exceeding five percent. 25 opportunities were observed with five medication errors, resulting in a medication error rate of 20 percent. This affected two (#37 and #64) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 01/13/25. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, and metabolic encephalopathy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had intact cognition. Review of the physicians order for 03/2025 revealed Resident #37 had orders including for vitamin B1 (vitamin) 1,000 units, docusate sodium (stool softener) 100 milligrams (mg.), and magnesium oxide (antacid) 400 mg. Observation on 03/05/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated when opened and the safe disposal of medications. This affected two of three medication carts inspected and had the potential to affect two residents (#19 and #48) the facility identified as cognitively impaired and independently mobile. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Observation during medication administration on 03/05/25 at 7:50 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #312 placed a tablet of Lasix (diuretic) 40 milligrams (mg) in the medication cup and then stated that it was the wrong dose. LPN #312 then took the Lasix 40 mg tablet and threw it away in the trash can connected to the side of the medication cart. After the medications were prepared, LPN #312 spilled three medications on the cart. LPN #312 identified one of the medications as Senna (stool softener) and disposed of it in the trash connected to the medication cart. LPN #312 then went into Resident #37's room and administered his morning medication, leaving the other two medications on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received his food preference of double portions. This affected one (#30) of three residents reviewed for meals. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, hypoglycemia, bipolar disorder, hypotension, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact and required set-up/clean-up assistance with eating. Review of the physician order dated 02/11/25 revealed Resident #30 received a regular diet, regular texture, regular/thin consistency, and double portions per the resident request. Interview on 03/03/25 at 10:13 A.M. with Resident #30 stated there was not enough food and he was often hungry. Resident #30 reported at times they give him extra food. Review of the dinner meal ticket…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care to residents in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This affected one resident (#11). The facility identified 16 residents on EBP. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 12/30/20 with diagnoses of cerebral palsy and gastrostomy (an artificial opening into the stomach) status. Review of the significant change comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had intact cognition and required more than 51% of her nutrition and more than 501 milliliters (ml) of fluid daily through her gastrostomy tube. Review of the current physician order dated 03/03/25 revealed Resident #11 was on EBP for infection control. Review of the current care plan revealed Resident #11 was on EBP due to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to ensure a mattress was compatible with a bed. This affected one (#70) of seven resident reviewed for accident hazards. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 11/13/24. Diagnoses include anoxic brain damage, tracheostomy status, and generalized idiopathic epilepsy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). There was no documentation of Resident #70's assessment for a modified bed in the medical record. Observation on 03/03/25 at 10:23 A.M. revealed Resident #70's mattress did not fit the bed. A large gap between the end of the bed footboard and the mattress was noted. Interview on 03/04/25 at 2:58 P.M. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #375 stated he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely notify a resident before a roommate change. This affected one (#85) of three residents reviewed for room changes. The facility census was 80. Findings included: Review of Resident #85's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/28/18. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, kidney cancer, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #85's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident's was rarely understood. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/11/20. Diagnoses included intellectual disabilities, schizophrenia, dementia, and bipolar disease. Review of Resident #22's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] she had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the document titled, Notice of Room Change, dated 09/21/24, revealed Resident #22 was informed that she would be moving into a room where Resident #85 resided. The form was silent to Resident #85 being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and review of policy, the facility failed to provide appropriate care, assessments, and ongoing monitoring of a pressure ulcer. This affected one (#9) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/01/19, diagnoses included an unspecified injury of thoracic spinal cord, paralytic syndrome, protein calorie malnutrition, paraplegia, mood disorder, major depressive disorder, heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease. Resident #9 had an indwelling catheter and a colostomy and an unhealed stage IV pressure ulcer to the coccyx. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment Resident #9 was cognitively intact, had functional impairments to bilateral upper and lower extremities, was dependent for transfers, toilet use, personal hygiene, and dressing. Review of the care plan for Resident #9 revealed a deficit in activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, admission packet review, review of facility documents and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a written discharge notice was provided to residents and their representatives for a facility-initiated discharge. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 80. Findings Include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/18/23 and a discharge date of 02/24/24. Diagnoses included pleural effusion (fluid around his lungs), Alzheimer's disease, dementia, cough, edema, shortness of breath and altered mental status. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four indicating Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #1 required partial assistance from staff with toilet use, bathing, and dressing. Resident #1 displayed no behaviors at the time of the review. Review of Resident #1's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide privacy during personal care and failed to ensure residents in a semi-private room had a means to maintain privacy. This affected three residents (#33, #69, and #83) of three residents observed for privacy. The facility census was 79. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/15/22. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, and basal cell carcinoma. Review of Resident #69's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed with impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs), and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Observation on 02/21/24 at 9:52 A.M. revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #156 was performing incontinence care for Resident #69 with the door to the room closed. Resident #69 was lying on her bed which was located near the window. Further observation revealed Resident #72, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on self-reported incident review, medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to submit the results of an investigation to the State Survey Agency in a timely manner. This affected one (#27) of one residents reviewed for neglect. The facility census is 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included other hypertrophic osteoarthropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus with other diabetic arthropathy, and major depressive disorder recurrent. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/27/24, revealed the resident was significantly cognitively impaired. Review of a self-reported incident (SRI) created on 01/03/24 under the category of neglect, mistreatment, or abuse for Resident #27. Further review of the SRI revealed Resident #27 reported a staff member provided a shower that day, but Resident #27 did not want a shower. Review of the facility SRI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, review of staffing schedules and payroll information, the facility failed to ensure staffing included Registered Nurse in-house coverage was provided daily for eight consecutive hours during a 24-hour period. This affected all 85 residents residing in the facility. The facility census in 85. Findings include: Review of facilit's master schedule obtained from payroll data between 08/13/23 and 11/13/23, noted the facility staffing assignments lacking Registered Nurse (RN) coverage of eight hours during a 24-hour period. These dates included the following: 08/24/23, 09/02/23, 09/03/23, 10/14/23, 10/28/23, 11/12/23. Interview on 11/16/23 at 11:47 A.M., with Human Resources Director #207 confirmed responsibility for developing and implementing facility nursing staff schedules. Review of nursing schedules and associated payroll information between 08/13/23 and 11/13/23, Human Resources Director #207 verified the absence of an RN scheduled for eight hours during a 24-hour period on 08/24/23, 09/02/23, 09/03/23, 10/14/23, 10/28/23, 11/12/23.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen and food storage areas were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff sanitized their hands prior to and during meal service and did not sanitize the hands of the 17 residents in the memory care (#2, #5, #10, #13, #18, #22, #25, #27, #28, #43, #44, #45, #46, #60, #65, #82, and #84; Resident #62 did not eat lunch.) prior to their lunch meal. This had the potential to affect all residents except one resident (#11) who the facility identified as not accepting food by mouth. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Observations on 11/13/23 at 8:50 A.M. of the kitchen and storage areas revealed the kitchen floor was dirty with a layer of debris, dirt, and dust especially along the wall and under the storage open cabinet. Observation of the walk in refrigerator revealed the shelving appeared to have a white mold like substance and the floor was dirty. Further observation of the walk in refrigerator revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews, review of the Certification And Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) Report, staff interviews, review of staff schedules, and review of the administrator's job description, the facility failed to implement resources to ensure identified concerns were sufficiently corrected and resident needs were adequately met. This affected five residents (#9, #39, #63, #64, and #288) and had the potential to affect all 85 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the Certification And Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) Report, dated 11/03/23, revealed the facility had been cited at Data Tag F-689 (Free of accident hazards/Supervision/Devices) during the annual surveys in February 2018, March 2019, and July 2021. Additional concerns at Data Tag F-689 were identified during this recertification survey on 11/16/23. Review of the CASPER Report, dated 11/03/23, revealed the facility had been cited at Data Tag F-561 (Self-Determination) on March 2019 and July 2021. Additional concerns at Data Tag F-561 were identified during this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had daily access to their resident fund accounts. This had the potential to affect 54 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #6, #8, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #28, #29, #30, #31, #36, #37, #38, #40, #43, #44, #45, #46, #48, #50, #51, #53, #55, #56, #60, #61, #62, #65, #66, #69, #71, #72, #73, #74, #77, #78, #81, #82, and #388) of 54 residents with an open resident fund accounts. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Observation on 11/13/23 at 8:10 A.M., revealed the facility had a pink sign on the front desk stating, Banking hours 8:30 to 4:30. Review of the facility provided list revealed 54 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #6, #8, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #28, #29, #30, #31, #36, #37, #38, #40, #43, #44, #45, #46, #48, #50, #51, #53, #55, #56, #60, #61, #62, #65, #66, #69, #71, #72, #73, #74, #77, #78, #81, #82, and #388) residents had personal funds accounts. Interviews on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and resident representative interview, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were offered timely. This affected four (#13, #22, #24, and #47) of four residents reviewed for care plan conferences. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, cytomegaloviral disease, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, hypothyroidism, aphasia, major depressive disorder, essential hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/31/23, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of care conference progress notes, dated since admission, revealed Resident #13 had care conferences on 06/24/22, 09/29/22, 04/14/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, review of the facility policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's arbitration agreement was thoroughly explained for complete understanding of the agreement upon the residents' admission to the facility. The facility also failed to ensure the staff responsible for the arbitration agreement was able to thoroughly explain the agreement for complete understanding. This affected five (#8, #11, #52, #69, and #78) of five residents reviewed for binding arbitration. This had the potential to affect the 59 residents who resided in the facility that entered into the binding arbitration agreement. (Residents #1, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #12, #13, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #24, #25, #28, #29, #30, #31, #35, #36, #37, #39, #40, #41, #42, #44, #45, #46, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #68, #70, #71, #73, #75, #80, #81, #82, #83, #289, and #388) identified to have signed arbitration agreements.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This affected seven (Residents #13, #21, #47, #48, #63, #79, and #80) of 30 residents reviewed for clean and sanitary environment. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Observation on 11/13/23 at 9:00 A.M. revealed peeling wall paper in the hallway leading to the employee break room, peeling and torn wall paper to the left of the water fountain just outside the main dining room, base board torn and pulled away from the wall to the right of the drinking fountain and a broken chair labeled do not use broken sitting in front of the water fountain. The drinking fountain was covered with dust and a crumbled tissue in the bowl of the fountain. Additional observation on 11/14/23 at 8:00 A.M. revealed no changes to the items identified on 11/13/23. Observations on 11/13/23 at 10:40 A.M. and on 11/14/23 at 11:00 A.M. of Resident #80's room revealed broken blinds with missing and cracked slates on the right side and in the middle of the blinds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, record review and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner. This affected two residents (#14 and #79) of four residents reviewed for dignity. The facility identified 18 resident smokers. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 05/13/20, with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, anemia, hypertension, congestive heart failure, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had cognitive impairment and required substantial assistance for bed mobility. Observation on 11/13/23 at 11:29 A.M. revealed no linens on the bed of Resident #14, a bath blanket was underneath the middle section of Resident #14's body. Interview on 11/13/23, at the time of observation, with Resident #14 revealed the bed linens had been removed from the bed during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible. This affected two (#9 and #39) of 25 residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 01/01/23, with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, depression, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was cognitively intact, was dependent for mobility with limited range of motion to the right upper extremity due to a contracture for which a right resting hand splint with separators was worn at night for contracture management. Observation on 11/13/23 at 11:15 A.M., revealed Resident #9 lying in bed watching television with the over bed table to the right of the resident, the call light was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with opportunities and assistive devices for out of bed activity. This affected one (#73) of 24 residents reviewed for the provision of choices. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/27/23, with the diagnosis including left hemiplegia, alcoholic cirrhosis, cerebral infarction, pyogenic arthritis, malnutrition, pain in right shoulder and left hip, anemia, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, and urinary retention. Review of the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #73 with the ability to make needs known, intact cognition, no recorded refusal of care, range of motion impairment limitation to lower extremity, dependent on staff for activities of daily living including bed mobility and transfer, incontinent of bowel and bladder, received a mechanically altered diet,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0571 — isolatedLimit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure they received approval in writing to access personal funds and keep the Medicaid regulated $50 each month for a Medicaid resident. This affected one (#22) of five residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 05/04/22, with diagnoses including femur fracture, vascular leuko encephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 2 and required extensive assistance of one to two staff for mobility. The score is as follows: 13-15 = cognitively intact, 8-12 = moderately impaired, and 0-7 = severe impairment. Review of the BIMS assessments dated 05/08/22 to 11/07/23 revealed the resident's BIMS score ranged from one to three, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's advanced directives were clearly described and contained in medical records. This affected three (#33, #68, #81) of 24 residents reviewed for advanced directives and code status choices. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed an admission date on 06/05/23, with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, congestive heart failure, and hypertension. Review of the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #33 with severe cognitive impairment, sometimes understands or is understood, moderately impaired vision without corrective lenses, hearing deficit, and required partial to moderate staff assistance to complete hygiene task and activities of daily living. Review of the medical record revealed on 06/06/23, a physician order was implemented for Advanced Directive: Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) DNRCC. No directions specified for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Power of Attorney (POA) interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician and family were contacted after a change in condition with acute pain was identified. This affected one (#47) of two residents reviewed for a change in condition. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 05/19/20, with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, muscle weakness, depression insomnia, Review of the emergency contact list revealed Resident #47 had a friend listed at the emergency contact with notation of being the healthcare and financial power of attorney as well as a daughter and brother listed as additional contacts. Review of the physician orders dated 10/07/20 revealed an order for Tylenol tablet (acetaminophen) with instructions to given one tablet, 650 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Review of the Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure beneficiary notices were completed. This affected two (#22 and #82) of four residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 05/04/22, with diagnoses including femur fracture, vascular leukoencephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff for mobility. Review of the record revealed no evidence of a skilled nursing facility advanced beneficiary notification (SNF ABN) on file when skilled services ended on 09/07/23. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 07/18/23, with diagnoses including pleural effusion, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, weakness, and altered mental status. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based of medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's personal privacy was honored. This affected one (#80) of two residents reviewed for personal privacy. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #80 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including inclusion body myositis, essential primary hypertension, mixed hyperlipidemia, chronic tension, weakness, and repeated falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/26/23, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #80 had functional limitation in range of motion on both sides and utilized a wheelchair. Review of the care plan, dated 06/15/23, revealed Resident #80 required activities of daily living self-care performance due to body myositis and required assistance by one staff with bathing/showering as necessary and was dependent with transfers via Hoyer lift for two staff members. Observation on 11/14/23 at 10:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's bed linens were changed when the linens became soiled and torn. This affected one (#47) of three residents reviewed for linens. The facility census was 85. Findings include Review of the medical record for the Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 05/19/20, with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, muscle weakness, depression and insomnia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had significant cognitive impairment and required limited one person assist for transfers and extensive assist of one staff for toileting and extensive assistance of two staff physical assist for personal hygiene. Observation on 11/13/23 at 10:11 A.M., of Resident #47 revealed the resident was sleeping in his bed and the bed sheets had numerous food stains from juice and likely coffee and what appeared to be urine stains. The linens also were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of self-reported incidents (SRI), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of injury of unknown origin and abuse. This affected one (#61) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 09/15/23 and discharged on 11/08/23. Diagnoses for Resident #61 included fracture of unspecified part of the neck of left femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, vascular dementia severe, hematemesis, epilepsy, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/24/23, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive one person assistance with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on and off the unit, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI), dated 11/03/23, revealed Resident #61 was discovered to have an injury to the pelvic area with the aide and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, or their representative, received written transfer information. This affected one (#86) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #86 was admitted on [DATE] with re-entry on 10/11/23 and discharged on 10/13/23. Diagnoses for Resident #86 included Huntington's disease, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, restless leg syndrome, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the nursing progress note dated 10/13/23 revealed Resident #86 had pulled the catheter out fully while the balloon to catheter was still inflated. Resident #86 was bleeding from the groin area. Emergency services were contacted, and notification was provided to the physician and emergency contact. A further record review revealed transfer information was not provided to the resident or the resident representative.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure bed hold information was provided to resident upon hospitalization. This affected one (#86) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #86 was admitted on [DATE] with re-entry on 10/11/23 and discharged on 10/13/23. Diagnoses for Resident #86 included Huntington's disease, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, restless leg syndrome, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the nursing progress note dated 10/13/23, revealed Resident #86 had pulled the catheter out fully while the balloon to catheter was still inflated. Resident #86 was bleeding from the groin area. Emergency services were contacted, and notification was provided to the physician and emergency contact. A further record review revealed transfer information was not provided to the resident or the resident representative. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) was completed. This affected one (#81) of 25 residents reviewed for accurate MDS assessments. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 09/01/23, with diagnoses including hypertension, dementia, glaucoma, cataract, and insomnia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #81 was cognitively impaired, had adequate hearing, speech was clear, and the resident was understood and understands others, vision was moderately impaired. Review of the active diagnoses revealed no vision diagnoses. Review of the visual function care assessment areas (CAA) which triggered in the MDS secondary to the inability to complete visual assessment secondary to cognitive loss, noted visual deficits related to glaucoma, cataracts and macular degeneration with blindness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate and updated Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed. This affected one (#21) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 08/29/17, with diagnoses including bilateral osteoarthritis of knee, muscle weakness, depression, anxiety, and unspecified psychosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had mild cognitive impairment with a BIMS of 12. Residents mobility was not assessed in the MDS, but resident required supervision with mobility. Review of physician order dated 07/28/23 revealed an order for fluvoxamine maleate tablet for depression. A physician order dated 09/08/23 revealed an order for trazadone oral tablet for depression. The physician order dated 10/20/23 revealed an order for Cymbalta oral capsule for depression. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an oxygen care plan was developed for Resident #52 and a vision care plan was developed for Resident #81. This affected two (#52 and #81) of 25 resident care plans reviewed. The facility census was 85. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 08/02/23. Diagnoses included complete traumatic amputation at knee level, vascular disease, diabetes and chronic viral hepatitis c. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff members for mobility and activities of daily living. Review of the plan of care dated 10/26/23 revealed Resident #52 did not have any care plan category or interventions for oxygen use. Review of physician orders for 11/13/23 for Oxygen via nasal cannula at two liters per minute continuous. Facility had no prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, manufacturer's instruction review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff worked within their scope of practice. This affected two (#288 and #78) of five resident reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #288 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acidosis, arteriovenous fistula, unspecified cirrhosis of liver, anemia, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes mellitus, and essential primary hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/4/23, revealed the entry assessment had been completed. Review of physician orders, dated 11/05/23, revealed an order for Resident #288 to receive Humalog Kwickpen subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit/milliliter (ml) with instructions to inject as per sliding scale: if 151-200 provide 2 units, if 201-250 provide 4 units, if 251-300 provide 6 units, if 301-350…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 08/02/23. Diagnoses included complete traumatic amputation at knee level, vascular disease, diabetes, and chronic viral hepatitis c. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff members for mobility and activities of daily living. Review of the plan of care dated 10/26/23 revealed Resident #52 had an ADL self-care deficit related to amputation with interventions for one to two staff to assist with bathing and provide a bed bath if not able to shower. Review of the shower sheets revealed dated 09/01/23 to 11/13/23 revealed resident last had his hair washed on 10/12/23. Resident #52 was noted to not need nails trimmed on 11/13/23 according to the shower sheets. Shower sheets made no mention of residents' nails being cleaned or trimmed during this period of time. Interview and observation on 11/13/23 at 10:28 A.M., with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, physician interview, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure clear physician instructions for blood sugars above or below parameters, physician and nursing staff had no barriers to communication, and a resident with a change in condition was treated and monitored appropriately. This affected one (#288) of one residents reviewed for insulin. In addition, the facility failed to properly assess and monitor change in condition for Resident #47 related to acute pain. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #288 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acidosis, arteriovenous fistula, unspecified cirrhosis of liver, anemia, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes mellitus, and essential primary hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/04/23, revealed the entry assessment had been completed. Review of physician orders, dated 11/05/23, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation, staff interview and facility policy the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place. This affected one (#22) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified fracture of lower end of left femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, progressive vascular leukoencephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease, type two diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, mixed hyperlipidemia, hypomagnesemia, dementia in other disease classified elsewhere, pruritus, vitiligo, dermatitis, essential (primary) hypertension, and diverticulitis of intestine. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/07/23, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive one person assistance for transfers and locomotion on and off the unit, required extensive two person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter was appropriately secured and maintained to prevent infections. This affected one (#77) of one resident reviewed for indwelling catheter maintenance and care. Facility census 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #77 had an admission date of 04/26/23. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease stage three, obstructive and reflux uropathy, atrial fibrillation and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident required supervision for toileting hygiene. The resident was noted with an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the physician orders dated 11/13/23 revealed the resident had an order for an indwelling urinary catheter. Observation on 11/13/23 at 9:34 A.M., revealed Resident #77's catheter drainage bag was resting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered weights were obtained and accurate, and failed to ensure significant changes in weight were evaluated and addressed. This affected one (#63) of two residents reviewed for nutritional status. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/16/23. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, encephalopathy, heart disease, hypothyroidism, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #63's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 was cognitively intact and required supervision for eating. Review of the care plan dated 06/22/23 revealed Resident #63 had a nutritional problem or a potential for nutritional problems related to diabetes mellitus, depression, variable weight fluctuations and variable meal intake. Interventions included observing, recording, and reporting any signs or symptoms of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen had an active order, the tubing had been changed timely, and had proper humidification of oxygen. This affected two (#52 and #14) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 85. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 08/02/23. Diagnoses included complete traumatic amputation at knee level, vascular disease, diabetes, and chronic viral hepatitis c. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was cognitively impaired with a BIMS of 9 and required extensive assistance of one to two staff members for mobility and activities of daily living. Review of the plan of care dated 10/26/23 revealed Resident #52 did not have any care plan category or interventions for oxygen use. Review of physician orders for 11/13/23 for Oxygen via nasal cannula at two liters per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, physician interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents care was supervised by a physician when the physician was unable to have effective communication with the nursing staff to provide direct orders for residents. This affected two (#9 and #288) of two residents for a change in condition. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #288 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acidosis, arteriovenous fistula, unspecified cirrhosis of liver, anemia, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes mellitus, and essential primary hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/4/23, revealed the entry assessment had been completed. Review of physician orders, dated 11/05/23, revealed an order for Resident #288 to receive Humalog Kwickpen subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit/milliliter (ml) with instructions to inject as per sliding scale: if 151-200…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure newly admitted residents were seen and evaluated by a physician within the first 30 days of admission. This affected three (#39, #63 and #64) of 25 residents reviewed for physician services. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/07/23. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, type II diabetes mellitus, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, bell's palsy, and hemiplegia to the left, nondominant side. Review of Resident #39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #39's Physician Visit notes revealed Resident #39 was seen by the Nurse Practitioner on 09/01/23, 10/11/23, 10/12/23, 10/13/23, 10/30/23, 11/07/23 and 11/13/23. No visits from the physician were found. There was no evidence in Resident #39's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications to address psychiatric diagnosis were monitored for effectiveness and specific treatment outcome for specified condition. This affected one (#16) of five resident sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission dated 11/05/14, with the diagnosis including, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, major depression, anxiety disorder, insomnia, lumbosacral disc degeneration, malnutrition, anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cachexia. According to the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #16 was assessed ability to make needs known, intact cognition, required set-up assistance for the completion of activities of daily living, independent with toileting, continent of bowel and bladder, utilized a walker for mobility, at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were appropriately stored and secured. This affected one (#68) of one resident observed with medications unattended at the bedside. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #68 had an admission date of 08/03/22. Diagnoses included rhabdomyolysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, and anxiety. Review of the physician orders dated 06/25/23 revealed Resident #68 had an order for DuoNeb Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) milligrams (mg)/milliliter (ml), one inhalation orally via nebulizer three times a day for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Observation on 11/13/23 at 1:39 P.M., in Resident #68's room revealed there were two plastic vials of DuoNeb solution left on the bedside table. Interview on 11/13/23 at 1:42 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #220 verified the medications were left at the bedside. LPN #220 verified there was no order for the medication to be left at the bedside and the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure newly admitted residents were seen and evaluated by a physician within the first 30 days of admission. This affected three (Residents #10, #19, and #23) of 17 residents reviewed for physician services. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/16/23 and a discharge date of 10/31/23. Diagnoses included kidney cancer, bone cancer, type II diabetes, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease, and chronic right humerus fracture. Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #10's Physician Visit notes revealed Resident #10 was seen by the Nurse Practitioner on 09/26/23, 10/03/23, 10/05/23, 10/06/23, and 10/10/23. No visits from the physician were found. There was no evidence in Resident #10's medical record that Resident #10 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's transportation was arranged and provided for a scheduled medical appointment. This affected one (Resident #10) of four residents reviewed for transportation services. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/16/23 and a discharge date of 10/31/23. Diagnoses included kidney cancer, bone cancer, type II diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease, and chronic right humerus fracture. Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact. Resident #10 required extensive assistance from staff with transfers and did not display behaviors at the time of the review. Review of Resident #10's Facility Referral Packet dated 09/09/23 revealed Resident #10 had pain in his upper rights arm with chronic weakness and cancer. Resident #10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were assisted with nail care. This affected two (#54 and #55) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 92. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/27/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia left side post cerebral vascular accident, congestive heart failure, and cirrhosis of the liver. Review of Resident #54's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had no cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance for bed mobility, bathing, and personal hygiene. Observation of Resident #54 on 10/06/23 at 8:32 A.M., revealed he had long, unkept fingernails. Interview with Resident #54 on 10/06/23 at 8:32 A.M., revealed he wished to have his fingernails trimmed but it was difficult to find someone to complete the task. 2. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of immunization records, staff interview, review of policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered pneumococcal vaccinations per CDC recommendations. This affected five (#1, #3, #58, #59, and #60) of five residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered the influenza vaccination. This affected one (#58) of five residents reviewed for influenza vaccination. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/12/23. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dysphagia, hypertension, heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, congestive heart failure (CHF), dementia, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 was severely cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of immunization records, staff interview, review of policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered the COVID-19 vaccinations. This affected one (#58) of five residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/12/23. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dysphagia, hypertension, heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, congestive heart failure (CHF), dementia, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #58's current immunization record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed no documentation the resident had been offered or received COVID-19 vaccines. Interview on 08/25/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to label and date open foods. This had the potential to affect all residents, except for one (#52), identified by the facility as having nothing by mouth. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Observation on 07/12/21 at 8:55 A.M. of the refrigerator revealed four small, covered bowls containing salad and 12 covered soufflé cups containing various salad dressings. The bowls of salad and salad dressings were unlabeled and undated. Interview on 07/12/21 at 9:02 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #387 verified the salad and dressings were unlabeled and undated. DM #387 stated the salads were left over from 07/10/21. 2. Observation on 07/12/21 at 8:56 A.M. of the freezer revealed two packages of pancakes that were soft to the touch. One of the packages of pancakes was split open, exposing the pancakes to the freezer. The package was unlabeled and undated. Interview at the time of the observation with Dietary Aide (DA) #376 verified the pancakes in the freezer were soft and one package was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of an example of a menu food choice document, the facility failed to allow residents to make choices related to their breakfast foods. This affected a total of seven residents, one (#32) resident reviewed for choices and affected five (#6, #19, #28, #44, and #60) additional residents interviewed for food choices. The census was 79. Findings included: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/15/21. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, unspecified atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, essential hypertension, acute kidney failure, and hepatic failure. Review of Resident #32's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed, 04/21/21, revealed Resident #32 had intact cognition. Interview on 07/12/21 a 1:43 P.M., Resident #32 stated the nursing staff ask him what he wants for lunch and supper the day before each planned meal and there are two choices to pick from. However, Resident #32 stated he does not get to choice what he wants for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, resident representative interview, staff interview, review of monthly activity calendar, and facility policy review, the facility failed offer appropriate and scheduled activities to residents. This affected six residents, one resident (Resident #4) reviewed for activities and five additional residents (#6, #28, #60, #44, and #19) interviewed. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 06/30/20. Diagnosis included atherosclerotic heart disease, edema, atrial fibrillation, obstructive sleep apnea, venous insufficiency, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, age-related osteoporosis, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder recurrent. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/02/21, revealed Resident #4 was severely cognitively impaired. Activity preferences revealed activities were somewhat important and included favorite activities and going…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-15 · tag F0914 — patternProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure semi-private resident rooms were equipped with full visual privacy. This affected six (#2, #14, #43, #45, #73, and #78) residents observed on the secured neighborhood. The census was 79. Findings include: Observation on 07/12/21 between 10:27 A.M. and 12:03 P.M. revealed residents and resident rooms on the secured neighborhood of the facility. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the bedroom had no privacy curtains. Resident #45 and Resident #73 were observed to be roommates in room [ROOM NUMBER] and Resident #14 and Resident #43 were roommates in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Additionally, room [ROOM NUMBER] did not have a privacy curtain for Bed A and the room was shared by Resident #2 and Resident #78. None of the three resident rooms had any other mechanisms in place to ensure the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER], #316, and #323 had full visual privacy. Observations on 07/13/21 between 3:00 P.M. and 3:36 P.M., on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a sanitary and homelike environment. This affected 21 residents, Resident #283 and 20 (#2, #3, #5, #14, #17, #21, #35, #36, #38, #42, #43, #45, #58, #63, #73, #75, #76, #78, #80, and #81) residents who resided on the secured neighborhood. The census was 79. Findings include: 1. Observation on 07/12/21 at 11:31 A.M. of Resident #283's room revealed the right closet door was off of the sliding track, leaning inside the closet, and partially behind the left door. The right side of the closet remained partially obstructed. The left side closet door could not be opened due to the position of the right closet door leaning behind the left door. Interview on 07/12/21 at 5:07 P.M. of Registered Nurse (RN) #314 verified Resident #283's closet door was broken. RN #314 stated she had not noticed the broken door and would follow up with maintenance. RN #314 then asked Resident #283 how long the door had been broken and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was positioned in a manner to allow for freedom of use. This affected one (#42) of four residents observed for call light placement on the secured neighborhood. The census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/12/21. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, major depression, and hypothyroidism. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/05/21, revealed Resident #42 was assessed with severely impaired cognition, required extensive two-plus person assistance with bed mobility and transfers, and was assessed with no impairment of her upper extremities. Review of a fall risk care plan dated 06/17/21 revealed an intervention to ensure Resident #42 had the call light within reach and staff should encourage the resident to use the call light for assistance as needed. It was also documented Resident #42 needed prompt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of resident trust accounts, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to convey personal funds to the resident within 30 days of discharge. This affected one (#284) resident reviewed for conveyance of personal funds. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #284 revealed an admission date of 12/23/16 and a discharge date of 11/20/20. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and anxiety disorder. Review of the Resident Fund Management Service Authorization and Agreement To Handle Resident Funds, dated 12/27/16, revealed Resident #284 authorized the facility to establish and manage a interest bearing resident fund. Review of the quarterly statement, printed 07/15/21, revealed Resident #284 was discharged from the facility on 11/20/20 and the trust account was closed on 02/04/21. Additional review of trust account records revealed two checks, one dated 01/22/21 in the amount of $1027.00 and one dated 02/03/21 in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident interview, resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to offer resident and/or representative participation in care plan conferences. This affected two (#39 and #71) of two residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan conferences. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #39 medical record revealed an admission date of 12/11/19. Diagnosis included metabolic encephalopathy, hyperlipidemia, psychosis, schizoaffective disorder, and dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/20/21, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #39's record review revealed a care conference was held on 03/12/20, 09/10/20, and 1/21/21. Interview on 07/12/21 at 11:16 A.M. with Resident #39's resident representative revealed care plan conferences are not occurring. Interview on 07/13/21 at 2:02 P.M. with Social Services #324 revealed while Resident #39's representative was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety while smoking. This affected one (Resident #37) of six residents who smoke. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record review for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 04/27/21. Diagnoses included schizophrenia and intellectual disabilities. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 06/30/21, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #37's care plan, dated 04/28/21, revealed the resident was a smoker. Interventions included the resident requires a smoking apron while smoking. Review of Smoking Safety Screen, dated 04/29/21, revealed Resident #37 must have a smoking apron and supervision while smoking. Observation on 07/13/21 at 8:59 A.M. revealed Resident #37 outside smoking and not wearing a smoking apron. Interview on 07/13/21 at 9:03 A.M. with Administration #405 verified Resident #37 was not wearing a smoking apron while smoking. Review of facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to change oxygen supplies for one (#51) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record review for Resident #51 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, toxic encephalopathy, anxiety disorder, and chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/25/21, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident receives oxygen treatment. Review of the physician orders, dated 03/15/21, verified to change all nebulizer tubing and components, date and initial each component. An additional order dated 03/15/21, verified to change all oxygen tubing, date and initial all tubing, including wheelchair tubing. Observation on 07/12/21 at 10:36 A.M. revealed Resident #51 in bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete side rail assessments prior to installation on the bed for two (#34 and #64) of two residents reviewed for side rails. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 03/25/21. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, muscle weakness, and left hemiplegia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/01/21, revealed Resident #34 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive two person assist with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Review of a physician order, dated 03/25/21 revealed Resident #34's preference of bed rails as needed to increase independence with bed mobility. Review of the plan of care, initiated 03/25/21, revealed Resident #34 was at risk for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to aggressive behavior, fatigue, limited mobility and stroke. Interventions included half…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician which resulted in a medication error rate of 11.11%. The deficient practice affected two (#52 and #62) of five residents observed during medication administration with four errors occurring out of 36 opportunities. The census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/23/21. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, anxiety disorder, diabetes mellitus type II, hypertension, and low back pain. Review of Resident #62's physician orders revealed an order dated 04/23/21 for the antidepressant Lexapro 10 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily, an order dated 04/23/21 for the supplement Vitamin D 2000 units by mouth daily, and an order dated 04/24/21 for the anti-hypertension medication metoprolol 75 mg by mouth twice daily. Further review of all medications revealed these medications were to be given along with other medications in the morning and were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were provided with the notice of transfer/discharge. This affected four (#78, #79, #180, and #181) of four residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. The facility identified 12 residents sent to the hospital in the past 90 days. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 11/27/24 and a discharge date d of 12/04/24. Review of a nursing note dated 12/04/24 at 12:03 P.M. revealed Resident #78 was sent to the hospital for shortness of breath. There was no documentation the resident was provided with a notice of transfer/discharge to the hospital. Interview on 03/06/25 at 8:10 A.M. with the Administrator verified the facility had not provided the notice of transfer/discharge to Resident #78 or resident representatives who transferred/discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. 2. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were provided a bed hold notice at the time of transfer. This affected four (#78, #79, #180, and #181) of four residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. The facility identified 12 residents sent to the hospital in the past 90 days. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 11/27/24 and a discharge date d of 12/04/24. Review of a nursing note dated 12/04/24 at 12:03 P.M. revealed Resident #78 was sent to the hospital for shortness of breath. There was no documentation the resident was provided a bed hold notice at the time of transfer. Interview on 03/06/25 at 8:10 A.M. with the Administrator verified the facility had not provided the bed hold notice at the time of transfer to Resident #78 or resident representatives who transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. 2. Review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-11-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespreadEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the resident council minutes, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with all reasonable ingredients during meal service. This affected one Resident (#32) of six reviewed for food and had the potential to affect all residents except one resident (#11) the facility identified as not receiving food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 03/20/23. Diagnoses included acute appendicitis, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was cognitively intact. Observation on 11/13/23 at 12:15 P.M. revealed hotdogs were served on a piece of bread instead of a hotdog bun. Residents observed with a hotdog in a piece of bread included Residents #17, #20, #32, #36, and #50. Interview on 11/13/23 at approximately 1:30 P.M. with Director of Dining Services (DDS) #195…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2021-07-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to post daily nurse staffing. This had the potential to affect 79 residents in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 07/12/21 at 1:45 P.M. revealed the facility did not post staffing information readily available to residents and visitors at any given time. Observation on 07/13/21 at 7:25 A.M. revealed the facility did not post staffing information readily available to residents and visitors at any given time Observation on 07/14/21 at 7:30 A.M. revealed the facility did not post staffing information readily available to residents and visits at any given time. Interview on 07/14/21 at approximately 1:00 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility had not been posting the daily staffing information.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$193,489 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $39,820 — penalty dated 2025-03-10
- $16,746 — penalty dated 2024-03-04
- $75,033 — penalty dated 2024-03-04
- $61,890 — penalty dated 2023-08-25
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-30 for 27 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-02 for 64 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DIVINE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AREM, JEFFREY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 06/30/2019 |
| HERSKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 06/30/2019 |
| MARKOVITS, ISAAK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 25% | since 06/30/2019 |
| MOSKOWITZ, ISAAC | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 06/30/2019 |
| RICHLAND, ILAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 06/30/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365898. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.