Brookside Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 99.6 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-07-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of information from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP), and policy review, the facility failed to assess and monitor a newly applied lower left extremity immobilizer for a pressure area. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #57 was readmitted to the facility with a left lower extremity immobilizer on 03/25/22. The immobilizer was not checked for skin breakdown causing a subsequent avoidable unstageable pressure ulcer that was found on 04/06/22. This affected one (Residents #57) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility census was 93. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, unspecified asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aphasia, coronavirus, insomnia, dysphagia, mild cognitive impairment, muscle wasting and atrophy and anxiety disorder. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure portion sizes were served as planned. This had the potential to affect all 94 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the dietary spreadsheet for the breakfast meal on 04/17/25 revealed the serving sizes for the scrambled eggs was 1/4 cup, ground ham was a #16 scoop (1/4 cup), pureed ham was a #16 scoop, pureed eggs was a #16 scoop, and pureed muffin was a #16 scoop. During an observation on 04/17/25 at 8:00 A.M., the breakfast tray line revealed [NAME] #24 utilized #8 scoops (1/2 cup) for the ground ham, pureed ham, and pureed eggs and #12 scoops (1/3 cup) were utilized for the scrambled eggs and pureed muffins. During an interview on 04/17/25 at 8:06 A.M., Registered Dietitian (RD) #330 verified [NAME] #24 was not utilizing the correct size scoops for the ground ham, pureed ham, pureed eggs, scrambled eggs, and pureed muffins. During an interview on 04/17/25 at 8:08 A.M., [NAME] #24 stated he utilizes the dietary spread sheets to determine scoop sizes, however got mixed up and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control principles during tracheostomy care. This affected one (Resident #19) of one resident observed for tracheostomy care. The facility identified one resident who currently has a tracheostomy. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of tracheostomy, stenosis of larynx, post-procedural subglottic stenosis, paranoid schizophrenia, drug induced dyskinesia and morbid obesity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had intact cognition and was always continent of bowel and bladder. The resident required supervision with eating, oral and personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, bed mobility and transfers. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 02/22/24 for Resident #19 to have her tracheostomy inner cannula cleansed during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-07-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control precautions were followed and failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19). This affected four (Residents #80, #37, #31 and #33) residents and had the potential to affect all residents it the facility. The census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's COVID19 line list revealed Resident #80 tested positive for covid on 07/17/22 and had a cough. Resident #37 did not have covid. During observation of the third floor of the facility on 07/18/22 at 4:09 P.M., Resident #80 was walking in the hall wearing a cloth mas. Resident #80 went to the outdoor smoking area and sat next to Resident #37. Resident #80 and Resident #37 were smoking without a staff member present while sitting approximately three feet apart. During interview on 07/18/22 at 4:09 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #110 verified Resident #80 was sitting next to Resident #37 outside while smoking and were not socially distanced. LPN #110…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to appropriately secure and store resident medications which had the potential to affect all residents on the 400 [NAME] Hall (#2, #3, #5, #12, #17, #18, #19, #20, #32, #35, #36, #40, #41, #43, #46, #47, #52, #53, #54, #61, #63, #75, #81, #87, #88.) The facility also failed to discard expired medication which had the potential to affect all residents receiving medications from the 3 East medication cart (#9, #10, #13, #21, #22, #24, #25, #28, #30, #57, #64, #65, #68, #69, #72, #85, #341, #342) The census was 93. Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 9:07 A.M. revealed the 400 Hall [NAME] medication cart was unlocked and unattended and there was a plastic cup sitting on top the cart containing two tablets. Interview on [DATE] at 9:13 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #130 confirmed she had left the cart unlocked and unattended and the medications sitting on top of the cart included an iron tablet and a vitamin D…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-07-27 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of facility meal times, the facility failed to ensure resident meals were delivered timely. This had the potential to affect 91 of 93 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#27 and #44) who did not received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Observations made on 07/18/22 from 12:30 P.M. to 1:11 P.M. revealed dietary staff delivered meal carts to the 300-Unit at 12:30 P.M., the 400-East Unit at 12:58 P.M., and The 400-West Unit at 1:11 P.M. Observation on 07/20/22 at 1:42 P.M. revealed Dietary staff delivered the meal cart to 400-West Unit. Interviews on 07/18/22 from 10:32 A.M. to 12:16 P.M. Residents #5 and #18 complained that meals were late. Interview on 07/20/22 at 1:48 P.M. State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #42 stated when he first started working they made trays in the kitchenette on the unit , but after COVID , it all changed. The kitchen never notified when they make substitutes to the menus and the trays were always late. It happened all the time. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received food items as printed on the dietary ticket and the facility failed to provide food portions and therapeutic diets as planned by the dietitian. This affected one (Resident #41) of six residents reviewed for dietary services, and this had the potential to affect 91 of 93 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#27 and #44) who did not received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Resident #41 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, paranoid schizophrenia, dementia with behavioral disturbances, Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia, and impulsiveness. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/30/22 revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Resident #41 was frequently incontinent of B&B…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-07-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to label and date stored foods, discard expired foods and maintain kitchen sanitation. This had the potential to affect 91 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Observation on 07/18/22 at 8:45 A.M. revealed following in the main kitchen areas: 1. No hand soap or drying towels at the employee hand sink 2. Three-hole dish washing temperature log completed to 07/12/22 3. Opened cheese slices undated 4. Opened Medpass supplement undated 5. Open taco sauce dated 03/10/22 6. Nine covered plated salads undated 7. Three sealed meat packages in a pan of water in a sink During interview on 07/18/22 at 8:45 A.M., Assistant [NAME] #49 and Diet Manager, (DM) #42 verified the undated and expired foods. Assistant [NAME] #49 verified the meat should have been thawed running water. [NAME] #126 verified there should have been soap and towels at the employee hand sink. Observation on 07/19/22 at 6:55 A.M.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-07-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of abnormal resident blood sugars as ordered. This affected one (Resident #82) of 16 residents with orders for routine blood sugar monitoring. The census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 12/03/21 with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #82 dated 06/12/22 revealed resident was cognitively intact and required limited assistance of one staff with activities of daily living. Review of physician exam note for Resident #82 dated 07/20/22 revealed resident was being treated in the facility for chronic medical problems which included diabetes and a history of diabetic foot ulcers. The physician's plan for diabetic management included to monitor blood sugars and administer insulin as ordered. Review of July 2022 monthly physician's orders for Resident #82 revealed an order dated 01/20/22 for inulin lispro per sliding scale: If blood sugar was under 80, call physician.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-07-27 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete and transmit a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident that was admitted to hospice services. This affected one (Resident #57) of 19 residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, unspecified asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aphasia, coronavirus, insomnia, dysphagia, mild cognitive impairment, muscle wasting and atrophy and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #57's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/22/22, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and was totally dependent with bed mobility, dressing, and toileting. Resident #57 required extensive assistance with eating, and personal hygiene and transfers did not occur during the MDS timeframe.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment was accurate regarding the presence of gastrostomy tubes (g-tubes.) This affected one (Resident #33) of three residents in the facility with g-tubes. The census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 04/14/22 with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the nasal cavity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #33 dated 04/21/22 revealed resident was cognitively intact and required assistance of staff with activities of daily living. Review of section K of the MDS for Resident #33 revealed resident was coded as negative for the presence of a feeding tube. Review of admission nursing assessment for Resident #33 dated 04/14/22 revealed resident had a g-tube in his abdomen present upon admission. Observation on 07/18/22 10:51 A.M. of Resident #33 revealed resident had a g-tube inserted in his abdomen. During interview on 07/18/22 at 10:51 A.M., Resident #33 confirmed resident was admitted to the facility with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HEALTH CARE FACILITY MANAGEMENT, LLC — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH