No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Advanced Healthcare Center

955 Garden Lake Pkwy, Toledo, OH 43614 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (419) 382-2200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (419) 382-2200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Jul 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3341 Glendale Ave · (419) 383-5614 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.8 mi
2430 Glendale Ave · (419) 381-6981 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2350 Airport Hwy · (419) 385-8006 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1226 Woodsdale Park Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1065 Garden Lake Pkwy · (419) 380-9319

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.0%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms54.4%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.3%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.1%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.5%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.6%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.0%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.0%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 6.5–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.271.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
45.1%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 84.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-29)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely notification for a change in condition for a resident who was cognitively impaired and had a Power of Attorney (POA) for medical decisions. This affected one resident (#12) of three residents reviewed for timely notification. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 07/31/25. Diagnoses included mild intellectual disability, adjustment disorder, dementia, and diabetes mellitus Type II. Resident #12 had a POA to make healthcare decisions. The resident discharged to another facility on 05/08/26.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was moderately cognitively intact and had no skin conditions. Review of the nursing progress note dated 05/04/26 at 6:39 P.M. revealed Resident #12 complained of pain in the lower back and upon assessment, a wound was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were administered and maintained in a secured manner. This affected four (#64, #72, #93, and #94) of 18 residents receiving narcotic medications residing on the 400 unit. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Observation on 01/26/26 at 6:52 P.M. noted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #370 and LPN #316 conducting a shift change narcotic medication and controlled substance inventory for the 400 unit medication cart. LPN #316 was observed to be removing narcotic medication cards from the 400 unit medication cart and counting the number of medications (tablets, contents) on each card and reporting the count to LPN #370. LPN #370 was observed reviewing the controlled substance inventory log for each narcotic and controlled substance contained in the 400 unit medication cart to verify with the count reported. Thirty-nine narcotic medication cards were contained in the locked narcotics drawer in the 400 unit medication cartInterview with LPN #316 at the time of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a reach in refrigerator at a safe temperature, failed to date and label food items, and failed to maintain a sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility receiving food from the kitchen, except for Resident's #11, #30, #76, #88, and #89 who were identified by the facility as not receiving food by mouth. The facility census was 83.Findings include:On initial tour of kitchen on 01/26/26 from 6:10 P.M. until 6:26 P.M. revealed at 6:10 P.M. the reach in refrigerator located approximately three feet across from steam table had both doors propped open by serving carts, inside the refrigerator were 15 cups of grape juice, five cups of cranberry juice, 11 cups of orange juice, 26 cups of lemonade, six cups of milk, and 18 cups of an unidentified liquid, all cups were labeled but contained no dates. The inside thermometer for the refrigerator was reading 58 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Interview with Dietary Aide #337 at the time of the observation revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure vision services were provided timely. This affected one (#3) of two residents reviewed for vision services. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 09/22/25. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, anxiety, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed the resident had no corrective lenses. Review of a request for services form dated 09/24/25 revealed the resident had requested to be seen for eye care. Review of the vision provider schedule dated 10/27/25 revealed the provider was in the facility and Resident #3 was not seen by the provider. Review of the progress notes dated 09/25/25 through 01/28/26 revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented and fall occurrences were thoroughly investigated. This affected one (#4) of one resident reviewed for fall incidents and related interventions. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, left and right knee contractures. According to the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 with moderately impaired cognition, lower extremity range of motion impairment on one side, a dependency on staff for the completion of activities of daily living, and transfers. Resident #4 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, had no skin breakdown, was at risk for pressure ulcer development, and was receiving an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's indwelling urinary catheter was maintained in a sanitary manner. This affected one (#37) of three residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 09/23/25, diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, severe protein calorie malnutrition, benign prostatic hyperplasia, obstructive and reflux uropathy, hydronephrosis, hypertension, dementia, myocardial infarction, and resistance to Vancomycin. According to the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #37 had severely impaired cognition, had physical and verbal behavioral symptoms one to three days, rejected care one to three days, was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living including transfers and bed mobility, utilized an indwelling urinary catheter,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were clean and equipment was adequately maintained. This affected three (#11, #37, and #30) of 24 residents reviewed for environmental services, The facility census was 83. Findings include:1. Observation on 01/26/26 at 6:42 P.M. revealed an area of Resident #37's wall with gouges in the drywall and exposed drywall underlayment behind the head of the bed. The area measured approximately five foot by five foot. Additional observation on 01/28/26 at 6:15 A.M. noted the wall located to the right of Resident #37's bed with a liquid appearing splatter debris covering the wall and to the right of the bed a maroon mat on the floor with the same debris. On 01/28/2026 at 8:15 A.M. observation with Maintenance Director #319 of Resident #37's room verified the gouges in the wall behind Resident #37's head of the bed. On 01/28/2026 at 8:21 A.M. observation with the Director of Environmental Services (ES) #499 verified the debris on the wall and next to Resident #37's bed. ES #499 stated resident has a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, review of Self Reported Incidents, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse immediately to the administrator. This affected one (#3) of seven residents reviewed for staff to resident care and treatment in a facility census of 87. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, hypertension, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, chronic viral hepatitis C, anxiety disorder, systemic lupus erythematosus, alcohol abuse, opioid abuse, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had severe cognitive impairment, no recorded behaviors, and required substantial to maximal assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview and facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse. This affected one (#3) of seven residents reviewed for staff to resident care and treatment in a facility census of 87. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, hypertension, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, chronic viral hepatitis C, anxiety disorder, systemic lupus erythematosus, alcohol abuse, opioid abuse, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had severe cognitive impairment, no recorded behaviors, and required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living. The medical record contained no documentation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to administer a diuretic and insulin as ordered within a specified time frame for one (#3) out of seven patients reviewed in a census of 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, hypertension, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, chronic viral hepatitis C, anxiety disorder, systemic lupus erythematosus, alcohol abuse, opioid abuse, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had severe cognitive impairment, no recorded behaviors, and required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living.Review of the medication administration record and physician orders revealed orders for diuretic hydralazine 100…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely. This affected one (#85) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an admission date of 07/13/20. Diagnoses included osteoporosis, urinary incontinence, hypertension, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The resident was always incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting. Review of the care plan last revised 01/28/25 revealed the resident had urinary and bowel incontinence related to weakness, difficulty ambulating, and cognitive deficits. Interventions included the use of incontinence briefs and incontinence care as needed. Review of the task documentation for toileting dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility investigations, staff interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to the correct resident. This affected one resident (#89) reviewed for medication errors. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #89 revealed an admission date of 10/28/24 with diagnoses of follow-up for joint replacement surgery, depression, anxiety, alcohol abuse, and cocaine abuse. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #89 revealed he was cognitively intact and he was not ordered any opioid medication (narcotic pain medication). Review of the current physician orders for April 2025 for Resident #89 revealed no orders for Gabapentin (medication used for nerve pain), Doxycycline (antibiotic), Metoprolol (used to treat high blood pressure), Norco (narcotic (opioid) pain medication), and Oxycodone (narcotic (opioid) pain medication. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of public social media videos, resident interviews, staff interviews, review of the employee handbook, review of staff schedules, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to privacy was honored when State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #100 video recorded conversations and interactions with staff and residents (including during personal care) in resident rooms, in common areas, discussed resident care needs and described a resident's malodorous wounds using profanity, while posting the videos to social media and not in accordance with facility policy. This affected four (#13, #31, #62, and #73) of four residents reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. The facility census was 81. Findings Include: Review of STNA #100's public social media account revealed three live recorded videos (meaning the video was posted to the social media page as the video was being recorded) taken at the facility involving residents in the privacy of their home. The live recorded videos were dated 12/22/23, 12/25/23 and 12/30/23, with each video lasting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical records review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely notify the physician of a malfunctioning catheter. This affected one (#53) of one residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/15/23. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis, stage IV pressure ulcer to left buttock, left hip, right hip, right heel, sacral region, venous insufficiency, type II diabetes mellitus, COPD, schizoaffective disorder, chronic pain, contracture left hip, right hip, left knee, major depression, and anxiety disorder. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 11/11/23, Resident #53 was cognitively intact. dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs), including bed mobility, had an indwelling catheter, was incontinent of bowel, and admitted with four stage IV pressure ulcers and one in-house acquired pressure ulcer. Review of the plan of care, revised 07/12/23, revealed Resident #53 had a supra pubic indwelling catheter related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, family interview, staff interview, review of the facility contingency box medication list, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were available from the pharmacy for timely administration. In addition, the facility failed to secure available medications from the contingency box for administration when resident's medications were unavailable from the pharmacy. This affected five (#2, #68, #284, #285, #287) of nine residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 81. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/17/23. Diagnoses included pancreatic cancer, antiphospholipid syndrome, fibromyalgia, breast cancer, thrombocytopenia, and hemiplegia/hemiparesis following a cerebral vascular accident. Review the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/24/23, revealed Resident #2 had intact cognition. The resident was independent for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician, within prescribed time frames, and in accordance with manufacturer instructions for use, resulting in a medication error rate above five percent (%). A total of 10 medication errors were observed out of 43 opportunities for a medication administration error rate of 23.26%. This affected four (Residents #16, #52, #1, #53) of six residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed a physician order dated 11/17/23 for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (pain medication) 5-325 milligrams (mg) one tablet four times a day for pain scheduled 9:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., 6:00 P.M., 9:00 P.M. An order dated 06/22/23 for as needed (PRN) Acetaminophen 325 mg two tablets every six hours for pain. Observation on 12/12/23 at 7:17 A.M. noted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #121 obtained Resident #16's medications from the medication cart and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure signage and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) were posted and available to a COVID-19 positive room. This affected one (Resident #17) of one resident observed for isolation. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff took off used PPE and practiced hand hygiene when exiting a COVID-19 positive room. This affected two (Residents #38 and #40) of two residents observed in contact with the staff member. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/31/23. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nicotine dependence, and COVID-19. Resident #17's COVID-19 diagnosis was added 12/08/23. Review of Resident #17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #17 was cognitively intact. Resident #17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review revealed the facility failed to ensure residents lighting was in working condition and within reach. This affected one (#287) of one residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #287's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/08/23. Diagnosis included basal cell carcinoma of the scalp and neck, myasthenia gravis, diabetes mellitus, acute respiratory failure, adult failure to thrive, and osteomyelitis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed it was in process. Review of Resident #287's care plan revealed the resident had complaints of acute/chronic pain. Interventions were to follow physician orders for complaint of pain. Observation on 12/11/23 at 3:24 P.M. revealed Resident #287 was lying in bed in a brightly lit room. The resident was unable to reach the wall switches to be able to control the ceiling light nor the overhead bed light. Observation of the bedside lamp revealed it was out of reach and did not contain a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of the air mattress user manual, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure interventions were consistently implemented to promote skin integrity. This affected one (#53) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census 81. Findings include: Resident #53 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including osteomyelitis, stage IV pressure ulcer to left buttock, left hip, right hip, right heel, and sacral region, venous insufficiency, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, chronic pain, contracture left hip, right hip, and left knee, major depression, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/11/23, revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact, dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs), had an indwelling catheter, was incontinent of bowel, and admitted with four stage IV…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to timely address bowel incontinence and related indwelling urinary catheter malfunction. This affected one (#53) of two residents reviewed for incontinence and catheter care. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Resident #53 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, stage IV pressure ulcer to left buttock, left hip, right hip, right heel, sacral region, venous insufficiency, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, chronic pain, contracture left hip, right hip, left knee, major depression, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/11/23, revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact, dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs), utilized an indwelling catheter, was incontinent of bowel, and admitted with four stage IV pressure ulcers and had one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication error, when insulin orders were erroneously discontinued from the medication record. This affected one (#2) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The current census is 78. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #2 included cerebral edema, bipolar disorder, diabetes, heart failure, and morbid obesity. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was a two-person assist for Activities of Daily (ADL). Resident #2 received 3 insulin injections out of 7 days in the review period. Per the assessment there were 0 times the physician changed the order for the insulin. The assessment was documented as signed on 09/19/23 after the 09/13/23 discharge.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of the medical record, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure the functioning of wandering devices to prevent elopement was monitored. This affected two (#30 and #31) of two residents reviewed for wandering devices. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure hot water temperatures did not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This affected two (#11 and #115) of seven residents reviewed for hot water temperatures. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/27/17, with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had impaired cognition. Review of a physician order dated 11/17/22 revealed Resident #30 required staff to check the function of his wandering device on day and night shifts. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the evening shift on 09/02/23 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, review of facility identified diet list, review of the facility temperature logs, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure refrigerator and freezer temperatures were monitored daily. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except 10 residents (#38, #57, #58, #59, #61, #62, #68, #69, #86, and #102) identified to receive no food from the kitchen. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper hand hygiene when serving meals to residents in the dining room. This affected 13 residents (#11, #13, #14, #17, #22, #23, #25, #27, #30, #31, #46, #51, and #53) in the dining room who received cheese ravioli. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Observation on 09/05/23 at 10:05 A.M., revealed the August 2023 temperature logs were incomplete from 08/24/23 through 08/31/23 for the milk refrigerator, the reach-in refrigerator, and walk-in refrigerator and the walk-in freezer. Interview on 09/05/23 at 10:05 A.M., with the Dietary Manager #286 confirmed the temperature logs were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Review of the resident medical records, facility documentation of Ombudsman notification, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure required notification to the Ombudsman's office. This affected three (#58, #60, and #101) of three resident records reviewed. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review Resident #58's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/27/22, with diagnoses including: nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus without complication, dysphagia oropharyngeal neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, essential primary hypertension, schizophrenia, hyperlipidemia, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/02/23, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the census documentation revealed Resident #58 was hospitalized overnight from 07/23/23 to 07/24/23. 2. Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record review, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan included discharge planning. This affected two (#8 and #9) of three former residents reviewed for discharge care plans. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 04/26/23 and discharged on 08/23/23. Diagnoses for Resident #8 included pulmonary hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, hypoxemia, heart disease, essential (primary) hypertension, hypothyroidism, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/23/23, revealed a discharge assessment was completed. Review of the care plan, initiated on 05/02/23 and closed on 09/05/23, revealed Resident #8's care plan did not include a discharge goal. 2. Review of Resident #9's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 03/07/23 and discharged on 08/24/23. Diagnoses for Resident #9 included muscle wasting and atrophy, interstitial pulmonary disease, ulcerative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medication insert review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered timely and per manufacturer recommendations. This affected two residents (#17 and #40) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 78. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/29/20, with diagnoses including asthma, spina bifida, and seasonal allergies. Review of Resident #40's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed he had an intact cognition and required one person supervision for eating. Review of Resident #40's most recent care plan revealed he had an alteration in respiratory status related to asthma. Interventions were to administer medications per medical provider's orders and observe for side effects and effectiveness. Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed a physician's order dated 06/28/23 for Advair Diskus (steroid and bronchodilator) 250-50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received assistive devices with meals. This affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for assistive devices. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 05/31/13 with diagnoses of depression, insomnia, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had impaired cognition and required limited assistance of one person for eating. Review of a physician order dated 04/06/23 revealed Resident #11 required a spouted cup with meals. Review of Resident #11's current care plan updated 07/29/23 revealed he had a nutritional problem due to receiving a mechanically altered diet. Interventions included a divided plate and spouted cup at every meal. Review of the meal ticket for Resident #11 for the noon meal on 09/05/23 revealed he should receive a spouted cup and divided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately documented completed tasks in the medical record. This affected one (#30) of 14 records reviewed. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/27/17, with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had impaired cognition. Review of a physician order dated 11/17/22 revealed Resident #30 required staff to check the function of his wandering device on day and night shifts. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the evening shift on 09/02/23 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #252 checked the function on Resident #30's wandering device. Interview on 09/05/23 at 9:28 A.M., with LPN #252 revealed she had residents on her hall with a wandering device but could not identify them at that time. Follow-up interview and observation on 09/05/23 at 2:31 P.M., with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, revealed facility staff failed to follow the infection control protocol when caring for residents. This affected one (#86) of one residents observed in isolation. The facility census was 78. Findings included: Review of Resident #86's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/06/23, with diagnoses including: colon cancer, liver cancer, prostate cancer, and lung cancer. The resident had a history of multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO). Review of Resident #86's medical record revealed a physician's order dated 09/05/23 for enhanced barrier precautions related to a history of MDRO when dressing, bathing, showering, transferring, personal hygiene, changing linens, toileting, and peri care. Providing care to resident with a history of colonized multi-drug resistant organism; klebsiella pneumoniae. Observation on 09/06/23 at 3:41 P.M., Resident #86's room door was closed with a sign posted which revealed the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions and any staff coming in contact with the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents except eight (#13, #18, #25, #49, #57, #58, #60, and #61) residents the facility identified who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Observation on 07/10/23 at 9:05 A.M. of the kitchen revealed a disposable cup in the sugar bin on top of the sugar. Observation of the stand-up refrigerator revealed a reusable container of what appeared to be chicken noodle soup approximately one-fifth full with no date or label. Observation of the walk-in refrigerator revealed a food delivery box on top which was sitting inside of another box. Upon lifting the top box up, it was discovered the bottom box had leaf lettuce inside with no barrier and the leaf lettuce was in contact with the bottom of the food delivery box that was sitting inside it. Interview on 07/10/23 at 9:10 A.M., with Dietary Manager #367 verified the cup inside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with bathing, personal hygiene, and transfers. This affected three (#62, #14, and #60) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/28/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type II diabetes, hypertension, cerebral infarction, difficulty walking, morbid obesity, and polyneuropathy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Additionally, Resident #62 had no refusals of care. Review of the plan of care initiated 02/28/23 revealed Resident #62 had an activities of daily living (ADL)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide timely repositioning regarding dependent resident assessed at risk for pressure ulcer development. This affected one (#14) two residents reviewed for repositioning and pressure-reducing interventions. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, type II diabetes mellitus, anemia, contracture left and right ankle. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #14 with severe cognitive impairment, the resident was assessed to require two plus staff members for bed mobility and transfers, was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living including toilet use and personal hygiene, and was assessed at risk for pressure ulcer development.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of an owner's manual for an air mattress, the facility failed to ensure medical equipment was utilized in a safe manner. This affected one (#4) of four residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, dependence on respirator, tracheostomy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, polyneuropathy, low back pain, type II diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, left knee contracture, anxiety disorder, and major depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was assessed with intact cognition, required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, and required physical assistance of one person for locomotion using a wheelchair with no history of sustaining falls.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care was provided. This affected one (#14) of one residents reviewed for the provision of incontinence care. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, type II diabetes mellitus, anemia, and contracture of the left and right ankle. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, required two plus staff members for bed mobility and transfers, was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living including toilet use and personal hygiene, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #14's medical record noted a nursing plan of care revised on 10/18/22 which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line per physician orders. This affected one (#65) of one residents reviewed for peripheral vascular access. The facility identified five residents with peripheral vascular access lines. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/09/23. Diagnoses included gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the large intestine, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type II diabetes, emphysema, neoplasm of unspecified behavior of the digestive system, hypertension, depression, anxiety disorder, and malignant neoplasm of lower lobe, right bronchus, or lung. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #65 was cognitively intact, received antibiotics, and received intravenous (IV) medications. Review of the plan of care, initiated 06/12/23, revealed Resident #65 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration. This affected one (#36) of one residents reviewed for availability of medications. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, anemia, unspecified atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder edema, muscle weakness, chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of right lower extremity, and essential hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #36's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/14/23 for the eye medication Systane Ultra Preservative Free (PF) Ophthalmic Solution 0.4-0.3% with instructions to instill two drops in both eyes three times a day for dry eyes. Review of the July 2023 medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident #36's Systane…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line which resulted in the delay of administering an intravenous (IV) antibiotic medication as ordered. This affected one (#65) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/09/23. Diagnoses included gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the large intestine, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type II diabetes, emphysema, neoplasm of unspecified behavior of the digestive system, hypertension, depression, anxiety disorder, and malignant neoplasm of lower lobe, right bronchus, or lung. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #65 was cognitively intact, received antibiotics, and received intravenous (IV) medications. Review of the plan of care, initiated 06/12/23, revealed Resident #65 had an IV access.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside. This affected two (#59 and #70) of four residents observed for medication storage. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/16/23. Diagnosis included a stage four pressure ulcer to bilateral hips, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and contractures of the bilateral ankles. Observation on 07/10/23 at 10:31 A.M. revealed Resident #59 had a medication cup on her bedside table which contained her morning medication. Interview with Resident #59 on 07/10/23 at 10:31 A.M. stated the nurse left the medication cup on the table for her to take at her leisure. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #356 on 07/10/23 at 10:33 A.M. verified the morning nurse left the medication unattended in Resident #59's room. 2. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident equipment was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected two (#40 and #58) of five residents reviewed for a clean and sanitary environment. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Observation on 07/10/23 at 10:10 A.M., revealed Resident #40's electric wheelchair leg rest and foot area was covered with a thick layer of dirt and debris. An unknown brown thick substance was dripped on the leg area approximately three to five inches. Interview with Resident #40 during the observation voiced his wheelchair had never been cleaned. Interview on 07/10/23 at 5:05 P.M., with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #381 verified Resident #40's wheelchair was very dirty and needed cleaned. STNA #381 stated third shift staff clean resident wheelchairs. Observation on 07/11/23 at 11:11 A.M., revealed Resident #40's wheelchair continued to remain dirty and in need of cleaning. Observation on 07/12/23 at 10:08 A.M., revealed Resident #40's wheelchair continued to remain dirty and in need of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HEALTH CARE FACILITY MANAGEMENT, LLC — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 55.0≈ chain avg
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TOLEDO MSTR CO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 11/01/2018
MARINO, PETERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/04/2021
TRANQUILLO, DEBORAHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2018
PARKWAY MGT CO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/26/2025
GEORGAKOPOULOS, TOULAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2021
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
KAYYALI, AMMARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/11/2025
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
COBALT I IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2018
COBALT II IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2018
COBALT III IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2018
COBALT IV IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2018
MINORITY REPORT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2018
PARKWAY RE HOLDINGS I, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/23/2025
TOLEDO HC HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 3%Other / private 27%

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$331per resident / day
operating cost
$10,058per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$294per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365704. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next