No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Three Rivers Healthcare Center

7800 Jandaracres Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45248 · For profit - Corporation · 119 certified beds · (513) 941-0787 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (513) 941-0787 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2025Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6507 Harrison Ave., Suite N
Pharmacy
7567 Bridgetown Rd · (513) 941-4011 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8040 Durango Ridge Dr · (513) 207-8947 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3513 Buckeye Trce · (513) 467-6400 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.1%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms67.2%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.3%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.1%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.9%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.5%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.3%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine64.1%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.14U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.86
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.95
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.60
RN hoursweekends
44.9%
Total nursing turnover
38.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 102.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-06)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2022-05-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to properly transfer a resident using a mechanical lift (Hoyer) and the assistance of two staff per the resident's care plan. Actual harm occurred on 10/28/24 when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #35 completed a hands-on pivot transfer of Resident #11 from the bed to the wheelchair without the assistance of additional staff or use of a gait belt. Resident #11 sustained a fall to the floor during the transfer which resulted in a left femur fracture. This affected one (Resident #11) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 115 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 04/09/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, chronic respiratory failure, morbid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse to the state agency. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 101 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 11/14/20 with diagnoses including right sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction and hypertension.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1 dated 07/10/25 revealed the was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.)Review of the skin assessments for Resident #1 dated 11/05/25 and 11/08/25 revealed there were no new areas of skin impairment noted.Review of the facility SRI for Resident #1 initiated 11/13/25 at 2:35 P.M. revealed the resident reported staff had been rough with her while providing care on 11/08/25 or 11/09/25. CNA #66 was suspended on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to initiate an investigation of an abuse allegation in a timely manner and failed to protect residents during an abuse investigation. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 101 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 11/14/20 with diagnoses including right sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction and hypertension.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1 dated 07/10/25 revealed the was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the skin assessments for Resident #1 dated 11/05/25 and 11/08/25 revealed there were no new areas of skin impairment noted.Review of the facility SRI for Resident #1 initiated 11/13/25 at 2:35 P.M. revealed the resident reported staff had been rough with her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of facility policy, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident sexual abuse. This affected two (#64 and #500) of the six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 106. Review of Resident #500's chart revealed Resident #500 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, primary generalized osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, alcohol abuse, anxiety disorder, mixed hyperlipidemia, depression and history of falling. Resident #500 discharged from the facility on 07/18/25. Review of Resident #500's behavior care plan dated 03/18/24 and revised on 07/16/25, revealed Resident #500 had a behavior problem related to Resident#500 being noted in bed unclothed with male residents at times, wandering into male resident rooms and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse. This affected one (#500) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 106. Review of Resident #500's chart revealed Resident #500 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, primary generalized osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, alcohol abuse, anxiety disorder, mixed hyperlipidemia, depression and history of falling. Resident #500 discharged from the facility on 07/18/25. Review of Resident #500's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired.Review of Resident #500's behavior care plan dated 03/18/24 and revised on 07/16/25, revealed Resident #500 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse to the state surveying agency. This affected one (#500) of the six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 106. Review of Resident #500's chart revealed Resident #500 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, primary generalized osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, alcohol abuse, anxiety disorder, mixed hyperlipidemia, depression and history of falling. Resident #500 discharged from the facility on 07/18/25. Review of Resident #500's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #500's behavior care plan dated 03/18/24 and revised on 07/16/25, revealed Resident #500…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, Review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI) and review of facility policy, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse. This affected one (#500) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 106.Review of Resident #500's chart revealed Resident #500 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, primary generalized osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, alcohol abuse, anxiety disorder, mixed hyperlipidemia, depression and history of falling. Resident #500 discharged from the facility on 07/18/25. Review of Resident #500's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #500's behavior care plan dated 03/18/24 and revised on 07/16/25, revealed Resident #500 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident and the resident's power of attorney (POA) received a discharge notice. This affected one (#500) of the three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 106. Review of Resident #500's chart revealed Resident #500 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, primary generalized osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, alcohol abuse, anxiety disorder, mixed hyperlipidemia, depression and history of falling. Resident #500 discharged from the facility on 07/18/25. Review of Resident #500's chart from 03/11/24 to 07/19/25, revealed no documentation that Resident #500 or Resident #500's POA initiated Resident #500's discharge from the facility on 07/18/25. Further review of Resident #500's chart revealed Resident #500…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident who exhibited inappropriate sexual behaviors towards other residents. This affected one (#500) of six residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 106.Review of Resident #500's chart revealed Resident #500 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, primary generalized osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, alcohol abuse, anxiety disorder, mixed hyperlipidemia, depression and history of falling. Resident #500 discharged from the facility on 07/18/25. Review of Resident #500's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #500's behavior care plan dated 03/18/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in a manner to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect 108 of 111 residents. The facility identified three (Residents #37, #172, and #169) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 111 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/03/25 at 9:15 A.M. of the facility's dry storage area revealed the following items: an opened undated bag of baking powder wrapped in plastic wrap, an opened bag of marshmallows wrapped in plastic wrap dated 08/20/23, an opened 12 quart plastic container of chocolate chips with an open date of 12/10/24 and discard date of 01/10/25, an opened undated bag of egg noodles wrapped in plastic wrap, a cardboard box containing a jug of oil stored directly on the floor, a box of bananas which were brown with several gnats flying around the immediate vicinity, an undated bag of cake mix wrapped in plastic wrap, a large bin of flour dated 03/26/24, four large plastic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident dining choices were honored. This affected one (Resident #19) of nine residents observed in the main dining room. The facility census was 111 residents. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 03/29/22 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and depression. Review of physician's orders for Resident #19 revealed an order dated 03/24/24 for the resident to be on a consistent carbohydrate diet with regular texture and regular consistency. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #19 dated 08/12/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition, had no swallowing issues and was on a therapeutic diet. Review of the facility lunch menu for 02/05/25 revealed the main entree was homestyle meatloaf with a catsup glaze. Review of the facility menu spreadsheet dated 02/05/25 for the lunch meal revealed residents on a consistent carbohydrate diet were to receive homestyle meatloaf with catsup glaze.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff documented medication administration accurately in the electronic medical record. This affected one (Resident #99) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 111 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #99 revealed an admission date of 05/10/24 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension (HTN), and heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #99 dated 12/02/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of physician's orders for Resident #99 revealed an order dated 12/14/24 for metoprolol tartrate 25 mg give one half tablet by mouth two times per day for HTN and an order dated 01/22/25 to increase the metoprolol tartrate to 25 mg one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and the resident interview, the facility failed to maintain an adequate supply of food during tray service and failed to follow the facility menu. This affected four (Residents #12, #18, #19, and #20) of four residents observed for meal service. The facility census was 115 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 05/10/24 with diagnoses including alcohol dependence, respiratory failure, depression, psychoactive substance abuse, anxiety, chronic pain, and insomnia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #12 dated 09/01/24 revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 02/14/24 with diagnoses including diabetes, heart failure, epilepsy, colon cancer, and sleep apnea. Review of the MDS for Resident #18 dated 10/30/24 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Review of medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained proper infection control practices during tracheostomy care. This affected one (Resident #17) of three residents reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility census was 111 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 04/29/24 with diagnoses including centrilobular emphysema, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #17 dated 08/03/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required setup assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Observation on 09/24/24 at 11:42 A.M. of tracheostomy care for Resident #17 per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #21 revealed the nurse broke the sterile field when she touched the sterile gauze with her clean gloves instead of sterile gloves. LPN #21 picked up the gauze and placed it in the cleaning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility menu, observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility recipes, the facility failed to serve palatable and appetizing food to the residents. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility with the exception of two facility identified residents (#51, #111) who had orders to receive nothing by mouth. The facility census was 117 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility menu for 08/05/24 revealed the lunch entrée was Dijon pork loin. Observation on 08/05/24 at 11:50 A.M. revealed [NAME] #126 removed a tray of pork loin from the oven that had been cooked in its own juices. On the tray line there was a container of a thick yellow substance which [NAME] #126 identified as gravy. During the tray line service [NAME] #216 used a small scoop to ladle gravy over the top of each serving of pork loin. Observation of a test tray on 08/05/24 at 1:30 P.M. revealed the tray included peas, cabbage, oven roasted potatoes and pork loin with approximately one quarter inch of a thick yellow substance on top of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff provided visual privacy while providing incontinence care to residents. This affected one (Resident #37) of two residents observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 117 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 12/22/22 with diagnoses including paraplegia, fusion of the spine, depression, and history of fall from ladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #37 dated 07/08/24 revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. Observation of incontinence care for Resident #37 on 08/12/24 from 12:09 P.M. to 12:18 P.M. per two State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs #251 and #252) revealed the aides provided incontinence care to the resident and did not draw the blinds to provide visual privacy for the resident. Two residents passed by Resident #37's window and were able to visualize the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure staff discarded expired medication. This affected one (Residents #04) of two facility-identified residents with orders for multivitamins with minerals. The facility census was 117 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #04 revealed an admission date of 12/19/23 with diagnoses including emphysema, diabetes, anxiety, depression, schizoaffective disorder, and insomnia. Review of physician's orders for Resident #04 revealed an order dated 12/20/23 to administer a multivitamin with minerals tablet once daily in the morning. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #04 dated 07/03/24 revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits and required supervision for activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation on 08/12/24 at 8:23 A.M. of medication administration for Resident #04 per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #100 revealed the multivitamin with minerals was not available. During administration Central Supply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure personal hygiene was provided for residents. This affected three (Residents #72, #79, and #102) of three residents reviewed for personal hygiene. The census was 117. Findings include: 1. Review of the care plan for Resident #72, dated 10/28/23, revealed he had activities of daily living (ADL) deficits and required assistance with ADL. During observation Observations on 06/10/24 at 11:36 A.M., 06/11/24 at 9:00 A.M. and on 06/12/24 at 2:30 P.M. revealed Resident #72 had jagged nails that came over his fingers and had a yellow brownish substance under his nails. During interview on on 06/12/24 at 2:30 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #237 confirmed Resident #72's nails were long, jagged, and had a yellowish brownish substance under them. 2. During an observation on 06/12/24 at 2:28 P.M., Resident #89 had long, jagged nails that had a yellowish, brownish substance under the nails. During an interview on 06/12/24 at 2:30 P.M., LPN #237 confirmed Resident #89's nails were long jagged and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the food portions and liquids as planned by a Registered Dietitian. This affected nine (Residents #7, #11, #39, #50, #57, #72, #81, #89 and #98) residents. The facility total census was 117. Findings include: Record reviews of Residents #7, #11, #39, #50, #57, #81, #89 and #98 revealed a physician order for puree diet. Review of the breakfast spreadsheet reviewed the puree meal was to be served of six ounces of puree oatmeal, two ounces of puree sausage, and two ounces of puree bread. During an observation on 06/13/24 at 8:22 A.M., [NAME] #139 served four ounces of puree oatmeal, four ounces of puree sausage and three ounces of puree bread. During an interview on 06/13/24 at 11:27 A.M., [NAME] #139 verified she had not followed the spread sheet for puree potions. She verified she had served too little portions of the oatmeal and too much of the bread and sausage. [NAME] #139 stated she does not always follow the spreadsheet, which could affect residents on specialty ordered diets. 2. Review of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to prepared fortified foods according to the recipe for increased nutritional value . This affected six (Residents #19, # 46, #47, #50, #79 and #89) of six residents ordered a fortified meal. The census was 117. Findings include: Review of the fortified oatmeal recipe included oatmeal, whole milk, powder milk, sugar, and margarine. During an interview on 06/13/24 at 7:44 A.M., [NAME] #139 stated she prepares fortified oatmeal with powdered milk and butter to make it fortified. [NAME] #139 stated she does not use a recipe to know how to prepare fortified foods, including oatmeal, because she has worked at the facility so long. She stated she could not decipher the recipe because it was made for 100 portions, and she only had six residents with fortified orders. Review of facility policy titled Fortified Food Program, undated and Food Quality and Palatability dated 2023, revealed the facility will prepare food to conserve nutritive value and follow the fortified food recipes as a therapeutic intervention. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure thickened liquids were served as ordered. This affected four (Residents #72, #79, #89 and #98) of four residents reviewed for thickened liquid diets. The census was 117. Findings include: 1. Review of care plan for Resident #72 dated 12/06/23 revealed he was at risk for nutrition and hydration status. Review of physician orders dated 06/03/24 for Resident #72 revealed the resident's diet was dysphagia mechanical texture, and honey thickened liquids. During an observation on 06/12/24 at 9:00 A.M., Resident #72 was served orange juice that was not honey consistency. During an interview on 06/12/24 at 9:20 A.M., Dietician #264 confirmed the meal ticket said honey thickened liquids and the orange juice on the tray was not thickened. Review of facility policy titled, Food Quality dated, 2023, revealed the facility will serve food to meet the resident's needs. 2. Record review of Specified Resident, (SR) #89 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff changed gloves , performed hand hygiene and wore the proper personal protective equipment. This affected five (Residents #7, #10, #102, #53 and #38) residents. The census was 117. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 06/10/24 at 1:07 P.M., State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #206 checked Resident #7 for incontinence while wearing gloves. She left the resident's room with her gloves on. She went down the hallway, removed her gloves and disappeared out of view. During an interview on 06/10/24 at 1:15 P.M., STNA #206 stated she doesn't remove her gloves in the room after caring for a resident and will go down the hall remove the gloves and wash her hands down at a sink in the hall. She confirmed she didn't know the process, but should have removed her gloves and washed her hands before leaving the resident's room. 2. During an observation on 06/11/24 at 9:15 A.M. Registered Nurse (RN) #262 donned gloves to prepare medications for Resident #10. She removed medications from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Power of Attorney (POA) was contacted when a resident experienced a change of condition. This affected one (Resident #72) of three residents reviewed for notification of a change in condition. The census was 117. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #72 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included non-traumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, renal insufficiency, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), malignant neoplasm of prostate, seizure disorder, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 was severely cognitively impaired. His functional status was substantial/maximal assistance for eating, dependent for toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. He was always incontinent for bowels and bladder. Review of the progress notes documented on 04/25/24 Resident #72 slept all day, refused his food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided. This affected one (Resident #7) of one resident reviewed for privacy. The census was 117. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 10/27/23. His medical diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and dementia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was moderately cognitively impaired. He required maximum assistance for toileting and bed mobility. During an observation on 06/10/24 at 1:07 P.M., Resident #7's door was open with a full view from the hall. Resident #7 in bed with the blanket and sheets off the resident. The curtain was not pulled and Resident #7's roommate was sitting on his side of the room. State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #206 was asking the resident if he had soiled his brief and was feeling the brief to check for wetness. During an interview on 06/10/24 at 1:15 P.M.,STNA #206…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment was maintained. This affected two (Residents #2 and #86) of three residents reviewed for homelike environment. The census was 117. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 06/10/24 at 11:19 A.M., Resident #2 stated housekeeping hasn't come into clean the bathroom yet. He stated the blood was coming from his roommate's urine. During an observation on 06/10/24 at 11:19 A.M., Residetn #2's bathroom had bloody urine in the toilet and drips of blood down the side of the toilet going down to the floor. There was a strong smell of urine. At 2:11 P.M. housekeeper went into the bathroom and removed her gloves, dropping one on the floor. The housekeeper didn't pick up the glove and didn't clean the blood from the toilet. There were still the blood and strong smells of urine in the bathroom. During an observation at 3:39 P.M., there was still bloody urine in the toilet and running down the side of the toilet to the floor and the glove was on the floor. There was a strong smell of urine in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a wound was cleaned properly. This affected one (Resident #102) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified nine residents with pressure ulcers. The census was 117. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #102 revealed an admission date of 05/19/23. His medical diagnoses included neurogenic bladder, paraplegic, and depression. Review of care plan for Resident #102, dated 11/07/23, revealed the resident had altered skin integrity related to spinal fusion and has a stage pressure ulcer to the sacrum. Intervention was to provide peri-care as needed to avoid skin breakdown due to incontinence. Review of physician orders dated 02/29/24 for Resident #102 were to cleanse the wound to the sacrum with wound cleanser or saline. Apply silver alginate inside the wound and secure with super absorbent foam followed by a ABD pad and to use Zinc Oxide on the skin around the wound to secure the ABD pads. During an observation on 06/12/24 at 10:19 A.M., Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of self-reported incidents, review of pharmacy documents, review of written statements, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (#100) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Record review of Resident #100 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired at the facility on [DATE]. The resident was receiving hospice services. Diagnoses for Resident #100 include diabetes, anxiety disorder, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistant of two staff for activities of daily living. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #100 was ordered the antianxiety medication Ativan every four hours as needed starting on [DATE]. Review of Resident #100's nursing progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of self-reported incidents, review of pharmacy documents, review of written statements, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one (#100) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Record review of Resident #100 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired at the facility on [DATE]. The resident was receiving hospice services. Diagnoses for Resident #100 include diabetes, anxiety disorder, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistant of two staff for activities of daily living. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #100 was ordered the antianxiety medication Ativan every four hours as needed starting on [DATE]. Review of Resident #100's nursing progress note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review of online resources from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the facility failed to ensure the staff practiced proper hand hygiene during wound care. This affected one (#14) of the three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (MS), depression, anemia, anxiety, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #14, revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation of wound care/dressing change on 11/21/23 at 9:06 A.M. for Resident #14 and being completed by Wound Nurse Practitioner (NP) #51 and Registered Nurse (RN) #66, revealed NP #51 used alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) and donned gloves.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to obtain timely re-weights for residents who experienced a five pound or greater weight loss from the previous weight per the facility policy. This affected five (#22, #23, #27, #54, and #58) of five residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 11/16/17 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia without behavioral disturbance, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #22 dated 07/08/23 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required supervision with eating. Review of the weight record for Resident #22 revealed resident's monthly weight on 08/01/23 was 134.0 pounds (lbs.) and on 09/13/23 was 121.4 lbs. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 completed on 09/19/23 revealed there was no re-weight recorded for the resident. Interview on 09/19/23 at 11:26 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident trust accounts, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their funds in in a timely manner. This affected three (#7, #23, and #50) of three residents reviewed for resident funds access. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of facility list of residents with resident trust accounts at the facility provided on 09/18/23 revealed Resident #7, Resident #23, and Resident #50 had resident trust accounts with the facility. Interview on 09/18/23 at 11:00 A.M., with Receptionist #505 confirmed resident banking hours were 8:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. on Monday through Friday, and residents came to the front desk if they wanted to withdraw cash from their resident trust account. Receptionist #505 confirmed there was only one other person in the facility who was able to provide banking assistance to residents and that staff member was Community Wide Liaison (CWL) #640. Receptionist #505 confirmed the residents did not have access to their funds in the resident trust account on the weekend. Interviews on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to access a telephone where calls could not be overheard. This affected three (#89, #92, and #99) of three residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #99 revealed an admission date of 11/11/22 with diagnoses including contusion and laceration of the cerebrum, vascular dementia with agitation, psychosis, anxiety disorder, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and malignant neoplasm of the bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #99 dated 07/04/23 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs). Interview on 09/18/23 at 9:05 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #415 confirmed the secured unit did not have a private location for the residents to make phone calls. LPN #415 confirmed if residents wanted to make or receive a call, they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to store medications in an appropriate manner. This affected two (#87 and #93) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #93 revealed an admission date of 01/24/22 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), gout, and schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #93 dated 06/14/23 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with one to two staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the September 2023 monthly physician orders for Resident #93 revealed orders dated 05/13/22 for the antianxiety medication Klonopin 0.5 milligrams (mg) three times per day by mouth and nerve pain medication Lyrica 50 mg twice a day by mouth. Observation on 09/18/23 at 8:40 A.M. revealed there was an unlabeled plastic cup in the top drawer of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, review of the facility's policy, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure a resident exhibiting a potential COVID-19 symptom was tested timely, failed to ensure proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn when staff sorted potentially infectious dirty laundry, and failed to ensure the infection control log had the recorded information necessary to analyze and control infections. This affected one resident (#13) and had the potential to affect all 94 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 05/10/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and adult failure to thrive. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had impaired cognition. Review of the progress notes dated 05/09/22 to 05/12/22 revealed no evidence of a COVID test being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments and weekly weights as ordered by the physician. This affected four (#13, #30, #39, and #290) of six residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 05/10/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, dysphagia, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had impaired cognition. The resident did not exhibit any behaviors during the assessment period. Review of Resident #13's physician orders dated 09/15/21 revealed orders for a weekly weight every Wednesday on day shift and on 03/21/22, an order to complete a weekly skin assessment every Saturday on day shift. Review of the weekly skin assessments for Resident #13 revealed skin assessments were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure opened medication bottles were properly labeled and medications were not kept beyond their expiration date. This affected three of six medication carts and two of three medication rooms. The facility identified all residents received assistance with medication administration. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/11/22 at 2:29 P.M. revealed Elm-One medication cart had an unlabeled, uncovered plastic drinking cup half filled with an orange syrup. Interview on 05/11/22 at 2:30 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #120 identified the substance in the plastic as prosource and stated there was only one bottle in the entire building. LPN #120 stated she had one resident on the unit who took it twice daily and she was saving that for the evening dose. LPN #120 stated she retrieved the syrup from another medication cart and placed it in the cart unlabeled this morning during medication pass. 2. Observation on 05/11/22 at 4:31 P.M. revealed Elm-One medication cart had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored in the refrigerator and maintain a sanitary refrigerator and freezer on the Elm unit. This had the potential to affect 30 of 32 residents residing on the Elm unit who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#17 and #290) on the elm unit, who did not receive food from the nourishment refrigerators or kitchen. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Observation and interview on 05/11/22 at 6:10 P.M. of the resident's refrigerator on the Elm unit with Personal Care Assistant (PCA) #21 revealed the refrigerator had an unlabeled and undated quart-sized ziplock bag-containing, what appeared to be, cheese, which was moldy. There were two boxes of pizza, each wrapped in a clear garbage bag, stacked on top of each other and not labeled or dated. The pizza in the bag on top contained an unidentifiable brown sticky substance on the outside of the bag. The floor of the refrigerator contained two spots, approximately an inch in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were served meals in a dignified manner. This affected three residents (#43, #292, and #392) residents observed in the dining room. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/09/22 at 12:40 P.M. revealed Nurse Practitioner (NP) #500 was seated at a table in the dining room, eating a bag of microwave popcorn, talking on the phone, and working on her computer. Resident #292 was observed sitting at the table next to that of NP #500, facing NP #500, and watching her eat in the resident dining room. Interview on 05/09/22 at 12:41 P.M. with Resident #292 revealed Resident #292 asked the surveyor where her lunch was. Interview on 05/09/22 at 12:44 P.M. with Registered Dietitian (RD) #82 verified NP #500 was seated at a table facing Resident #292, eating and talking on the phone, while Resident #292 was waiting for her lunch to arrive. RD #82 further confirmed NP #500's actions were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were correctly documented in the resident's medical record. This affected two (Residents #5 and #28) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 94. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation, morbid obesity due to excess calories, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. Review of the electronic medical record revealed under the profile section, Resident #5's code status was a CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation)/Full Code. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #5's code status was CPR/Full Code. Review of Resident #5's hard medical record revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely provide a resident with an explanation of services terminated and provide information to the residents so they can decided if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid for Medicare and assume financial responsibility. This affected three (Residents #14, #26 and #291) of three residents reviewed for benefit changes. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #26 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included left tibia fracture and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had impaired cognition. Review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage, (NOMNC) for Resident #26 revealed Medicare Part A coverage was to end on 02/04/22. Resident #26 signed the receipt of the notification on 02/03/22. Interview on 05/12/22 at 12:20 P.M. with the Administrator verified Resident #26 had not received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRIs), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and ensure allegations of resident abuse were reported to the Director of Nursing, Administrator, and State Survey Agency. This affected one (Resident #51) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 11/03/16. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 had a severe cognitive impairment. The resident exhibited fluctuating disorganized thinking during the assessment period. Review of a progress note dated 04/21/22 revealed Resident #51 reported to the counselor that a male hit him in the face. The nurse on the unit was notified. Resident #51 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a new pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) when a resident received a new diagnosis of schizophrenia. This affected one (Resident #30) of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 01/24/22. Diagnoses included depression, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30's cognitive status was not assessed. Resident #30 did not exhibit any behaviors during the assessment period. Review of the medical record of Resident #30 revealed the diagnosis of Schizophrenia was added on 02/15/22. Review of the PASARR dated 02/03/22 revealed section E: Indications of Serious Mental Illness, was checked no for the presence of mental disorders, including schizophrenia. Interview on 05/11/22 at 11:11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as physician ordered. This affected two (Residents #25 and #60) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1 Review of the medical record for the Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 02/04/2022. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of colon, cerebral infarction, and end stage renal disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #60's physician orders revealed orders including lorazepam (treats anxiety) 0.5 milligrams (mg) tablet by mouth twice daily. Resident #60 had physician orders for Cefdinir (antibiotic) 300 mg capsule by mouth once daily for a urinary tract infection (UTI) written on 04/23/22 and discontinued on 04/27/22 An order, dated 04/27/22, revealed Resident #60 was to receive ciprofloxacin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely physician follow-up to monthly pharmacy recommendations. This affected one (Resident #31) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 02/16/22. Diagnoses included alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia and alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber dated 03/08/22 revealed the pharmacist recommendations to complete a baseline ammonia level as Resident #31 was taking lactulose and neomycin for hepatic encephalopathy. The Physician/Prescriber response was blank. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed no evidence of a physician response to the recommendations. There was no ammonia level ordered,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from of any significant medication errors. This affected one (Residents #60) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 02/04/2022. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #60 had a order for Cefdinir (antibiotic) 300 milligrams (mg) capsule by mouth once daily for a urinary tract infection (UTI) written on 04/23/22 and discontinued on 04/27/22. Resident #60 had an order, dated 04/27/22, to receive ciprofloxacin (antibiotic) 500 mg tablet by mouth twice daily for a UTI. The ciprofloxacin was to end on 05/04/22. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated April 2022 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observtions, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to store medications in a safe manner. This had the potential to affect four (#9, #11, #85 and #90) residents in the 300 to 310 hall, and seven (#3, #8, #34, #47, #52, #53, and #66) residents in the 200 hall identified by the facility as cognitively impaired and independently mobile. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1) Observation conducted on 05/19/19 at 9:04 A.M., revealed a treatment cart was noted at the intersections of the 200 halls. The cart was observed unlocked, unattended, and contained multiple resident, pharmacy labeled, boxes and tubs of medication creams. Interview on 05/19/19 at 9:05 A.M., with Registered Nurse (RN) #34 verified cart was unlocked and unattended, and should be locked when unattended. 2) Observation on 05/21/19 at 11:13 A.M., during medication cart review of 300 hall, while surveyor was reviewing medication, RN #101 walked away from the cart and into a residents room. Surveyor stepped away from the cart until RN #101 returned. Interview at the time of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy/procedure review and staff interviews, the facility failed to label, and date food items from the walk-in refrigerator. The facility also failed to serve food in a sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect 86 of 86 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified six residents (#24, #51, #55, #71, #91, and #96) that eat nothing by mouth. Facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/19/219, between 9:25 A.M. to 9:57 A.M., of the kitchen with [NAME] Supervisor (CS) #25 and Dietary Manager (DM) #41 revealed : a. In the refrigerator there was a container of stew beef sealed with no date or use by date. b. In the refrigerator there was a container of chicken noodle soup sealed with no date or use by date. c. In the refrigerator there was a container of bacon sealed with no date or used by date. d. A half loaf of bread, and three hot dog buns in unsealed/closed bag. e. Garbage cans without lids were in the food preparation areas. f. There were no sanitizing buckets in use to clean food preparation areas.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-22 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) review form for two (#58 and #302) of three residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notices given when discharged from Medicare Part A services. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 02/28/19. Diagnoses included displaced fracture of the fifth metatarsal bone of the right foot, unsteadiness and muscle weakness. Review of the Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Notification (SNFBN) form revealed Resident #58 was discharged from Medicare Part A on 04/19/19 and did not remain in the facility. Review of the SNFBN form revealed Resident #58 was discharged from Medicare Part A and was not given the NOMNC form. Resident #58 was discharged from the facility on 04/19/19, the day Resident #58 received the SNFBN. There was no explanation as to why the form was not provided. 2. Review of the medical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide stop dates for as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications and/or discontinue psychotropic's medications as needed when not administered for more than 14 days. This affected one (#87) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the record for Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 07/06/18. Diagnoses included dementia, psychosis, anemia, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia, cerebral infarction, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #87 had severe cognitive deficits, limited assist for locomotion, transfers, extensive assistance with dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene, and occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder Review of care plan dated 08/20/18, revealed Resident #87 was at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HEALTH CARE FACILITY MANAGEMENT, LLC — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 55.0≈ chain avg
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CT OPERATIONS HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/01/2019
MARINO, PETERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2019
TRANQUILLO, DEBORAHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2019
PARKWAY MGT CO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/26/2025
BAUMANN, ELIZABETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/21/2022
GROVES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
MOQEETH, SYEDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
ROMEO, DOMINICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
ODENTHAL, RICHARDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/23/2025
COBALT I IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
COBALT II IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
COBALT III IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
COBALT IV IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
CT HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
MINORITY REPORT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
TOLEDO HC HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 2%Other / private 27%

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$322per resident / day
operating cost
$9,804per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$309per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365081. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next