Burlington House Rehab & Alzheimer's Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 101.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, review of witness statements, review of the police report, review of information from Google Maps, review of a weather report, review of the facility investigative files, review of in-service education, and policy review, the facility failed to complete thorough investigations following resident elopements to prevent additional elopements from occurring. Additionally, the facility failed to update residents' elopement assessments and care plans following elopements. Lastly, the facility failed to identify like-residents at risk for elopement to ensure appropriate interventions were in place to potentially prevent the same actions, situations, and/or practices from occurring in the future. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injuries, and/or death on [DATE] at an unknown time when Resident #306, who resided on the west hall, exited the facility's secured unit on the south hall through a thirty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2019-11-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide nutritional supplementation as recommended by the Registered and Licensed Dietitian (RD, LD), and ordered by the physician, to improve the nutritional status of a resident identified with significant weight loss. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #36 was identified as having a 7.99 percent (%) significant weight loss in one month and did not receive nutritional interventions as ordered. In addition, the facility failed to provide nutritional interventions as ordered and identified on a second resident's (#20) care plan that placed the resident at risk for more than minimal harm. This affected two (#36 and #20) of seven residents reviewed for Nutrition. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of the left femur, Alzheimer's disease, hypertensive heart disease, chronic kidney…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were properly stored. This had the potential to affect 28 independently mobile and cognitively impaired residents residing on the west and south units. The facility census was 106 residents. Findings include:1. Observation on 03/17/26 at 9:21 A.M. revealed there was an open container of wipes labeled Sani-Cloth Plus Germicidal Disposable Cloth located on the floor under a desk at a nurses' station on the west unit. The label on the wipes indicated they should be kept out of reach of children and could be hazardous to humans and domestic animals. There was also an open container of wipes labeled Sani-Hands Instant Sanitizing Wipes. The label on the wipes indicated they should be kept out of reach of children unless under adult supervision and to obtain medical help or contact a poison center immediately if swallowed.Interview on 03/17/26 at 9:29 A.M. with the Executive Director (ED) confirmed the open containers of wipes on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and closed and open record reviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from sexual abuse. This affected one resident (Resident #81) of one resident reviewed for sexual abuse. The facility total census was 97. Findings included: Closed record review for Resident #81 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 04/23/25 to home. Diagnoses for Resident #81 included Alzheimer ' s, dementia, heart disease, depressive disorder, and psychosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and required partial assistance with toileting and supervision with ambulation. There were no functional impairments. The resident resided on the memory secured unit in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The resident had a guardian. Resident #81 had an emergency room visit on 03/30/25 and returned on 03/30/25. Record review of Resident Perpetrator, (RP) #11 revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment in resident bathrooms. This affected two (Residents #25 and #27) of three residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 100 residents. Findings include: Observation on 09/16/24 at 9:12 A.M. with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #111 revealed a ceiling tile in Resident #25 and #27's bathroom had a large ring of discoloration of an unknown dark substance. Interview on 09/16/24 at 9:13 A.M. with STNA #111 confirmed the discolored ceiling tile in Resident #25 and #27's bathroom had been that way for a least a month and had occurred following a water leak. Observation on 09/17/24 at 11:00 A.M. revealed the ceiling tile in Resident #25 and #27's bathroom still had a large ring of discoloration of an unknown dark substance. Interview with on 09/17/24 at 11:00 A.M. with Maintenance Technician (MT) #81 confirmed the ceiling tile in Resident #25 and #27's bathroom was discolored, and he was going to treat the area with a commercial mold and mildew spray. This deficiency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care. This affected one resident (#04) out of three reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 98. Findings Included: Review of medical record for Resident #04 was admitted [DATE]. Diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, epilepsy, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis. Review of the Bowel assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #04 was incontinent of bowel and required to be checked and changed every two hours. Review of the Urinary Incontinence assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #04 was incontinent with multiple episodes daily. Resident #04 wore an incontinent brief and was required to be checked and changed every two hours. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #04 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 03 which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #04 was dependent on staff for all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on [NAME] record review, observations, staff interviews, review of facility documents and policy review, the facility failed to provide resident's with a clean and sanitary environment. This affected four (#06, #10, #48, #80) out of four residents reviewed for the physical environment. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #06 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included, diabetes mellitus (DM)2, lymphedema, essential primary hypertension, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder, heart failure, major depressive disorder, and chronic kidney disease stage 2. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/28/24, revealed Resident #06 had severely impaired cognition. Further review for the MDS assessment revealed he required maximum assist with toileting and bathing. Interview and observation on 04/30/24 at 2:30 P.M. with the housekeeper (HK) #90 confirmed she had cleaned Resident #06's room at an earlier time on 04/30/24.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), observations, staff interviews, review of personnel files and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse. This affected one (#15) out of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Record review for Resident #15 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included, hydrocephalus, osteoarthritis, schizo affective disorder, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, dementia, and essential primary hypertension. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS assessment for Resident #15 revealed she required maximum assistance from staff with toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene and was dependent on staff for medication management. Review of Resident #15's behavior care plan initiated on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a valid Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed upon admission to the facility. This affected one (#06) out of one resident reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 99. Findings Include: Record review for Resident #06 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included, diabetes mellitus (DM)2, lymphedema, essential primary hypertension, anxiety disorder, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), adjustment disorder, heart failure, major depressive disorder, and chronic kidney disease stage 2. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/13/24, revealed Resident #06 had severely impaired cognition. Further review for the MDS assessment revealed he required maximum assist with toileting and bathing. Review of the PASARR Review for Resident #06 dated 03/13/24 revealed the facility failed to identify Resident #06's mental health diagnoses of major depressive disorder.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents with compromised nutrition status were weighed weekly as ordered. This affected three (#70, #33, and #85) of nine residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hyperlipidemia, unspecified obesity, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 04/11/2024 revealed Resident #70 had severely impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of the care plan dated 11/04/2022 revealed Resident #70 had potential for altered nutrition, had weight loss, needs for supplementation, and had inconsistent meal intakes. Interventions included identify resident preferences notify provider/family of unplanned weight loss, obtain daily weights as needed, offer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of medication information, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications when the facility administered antipsychotic medications without an adequate indication of use. This affected two (#66 and #349) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 01/24/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, and malignant neoplasm of unspecified site of right female breast. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 is cognitively impaired and frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #66 has no range of motion impairment in upper and lower extremities, requires touch assistance with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bathing,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of manufacturer recommendations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the medication carts. This affected two medication rooms out of two observed, and two medication carts out of three carts observed for expired medications. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Observation on 04/24/23 at 1:22 P.M. of the west unit cart one with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #315 revealed there was one bottle of stool softener that expired on 10/2022, a bottle of calcium carbonate (a supplement) expired on 11/2022, and a bottle of senna plus (a laxative) that expired on 03/2023. Observation on 04/24/23 at 1:23 P.M. with LPN #315 revealed three vials of tuberculin serum were opened and undated. Interview on 04/24/23 at the time of the observation with LPN #315 verified the expired medications. Observation on 04/24/23 at 1:25 P.M. with LPN #426 of the Mount…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HEALTH CARE FACILITY MANAGEMENT, LLC — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH