No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Capital City Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing Ce

920 Thurber Drive West, Columbus, OH 43215 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 104 certified beds · (614) 464-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 20242 immediate-jeopardy citations$196,256 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $196,256 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-29)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
915 Olentangy River Rd · (614) 293-8116 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
759 Neil Ave · (614) 224-9275 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
777 Neil Ave · (614) 224-3065 · Call to confirm hours
Park
First Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.0%5.3%15.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms80.4%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%6.1%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.4%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.8%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.6%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.2%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.6%75.6%79.4%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.0%CMS range 37.4–69.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.1–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
58.5%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 90.3 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-22)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-10-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility staff interviews, review of the fire investigation report, observation of facility video camera footage, review of the facility submitted Self-Reported Incident (SRI), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect when staff did not timely implement fire procedures when a mattress/bedding fire occurred in Resident #19's room. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injuries, negative health outcomes and/or death when on 09/26/24 at 11:46 P.M. a fire occurred in Resident #19's room which ignited the resident's mattress/bedding on fire, activating the fire alarm and sprinkler system and facility staff did not attempt to immediately implement fire protocols to rescue, contain and/or extinguish the fire in Resident #19's room until 11:53 P.M. on 09/26/24. Resident #19 sustained burns to her legs, torso, and arm, was transferred to the hospital and admitted to the Surgical Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, facility staff interviews, resident interviews, family interviews, review of a fire drill report, review of emergency response reports, review of report of fire email communication, review of facility video camera footage, review of hospital records, review of the fire investigation report, and review of the facility policies for smoking and Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free from accident hazards as is possible when one resident (#19), who utilized oxygen therapy and who smoked cigarettes, possessed smoking materials, including cigarettes and a cigarette lighter, in her room. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injuries, negative health outcomes and/or death when on 09/26/24 at 11:46 P.M. a fire occurred in Resident #19's room which ignited the resident's mattress/bedding on fire resulting in the resident sustaining severe burns to her legs, torso, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents in the facility.Findings include:Observation on 04/19/26 at 7:30 A.M. revealed the walls, paneling, and floorboards around the C hall nursing station appeared severely damaged and were in significant disrepair with exposed drywall and missing floorboards.Observations on 04/19/26 at 7:36 A.M. in the shower room of hall B revealed exposed hot water shutoff pipes visible through missing drywall/door covering, ripped/missing drywall covering on the wall immediately outside of the shower, no privacy curtain around the toilet, plumbing fixtures at the shower head were held together by disposable gloves, and soiled grout throughout the shower with approximately one foot of missing tile exposing bare wall at the bottom of the shower.Interview on 04/19/26 at 10:02 A.M. with Maintenance Director #417 revealed pipes for the hot water shutoff should be covered in the B hall shower room. Further interview at this time revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the food was prepared and stored in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all but two residents who the facility identified did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 91. Findings include:Observation on 04/19/26 at 7:07 A.M. of the kitchen revealed Dietary Aide #217 in the kitchen preparing breakfast trays with waist length braids and no hairnet on. Dietary [NAME] #215 verified the observation at the time of the observation.Observation on 04/19/26 at 7:09 A.M. of the ready refrigerator in the kitchen revealed one cup container of applesauce, one eight-ounce glass of orange juice, one clear container of pudding, and ten salads in brown bowls wihich were undated. Dietary Aide #217 verified the undated food items at the time of the observation.Observation on 04/19/26 at approximately 7:10 A.M. walk in refrigerator near the dry food storage revealed one bowl of chicken noodle soup, one bag of mozzarella cheese, one bag of salad, and one bag of cheddar cheese which were opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions, and failed to ensure intravenous (IV) bags were properly secured and not on lying on a soiled surface. This affected one (Resident #3) of 14 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions and had the potential to affect 34 residents identified by the facility on enhanced barrier precautions. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the primary diagnosis of abscess of liver, additional diagnoses include resistance to Vancomycin (antibiotic) and bacterial infections involving multiple species of bacteria such as enterococcus, proteus mirabilis, and pseudomonas.Further review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating moderate cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #3's physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic medications were used for an indicated diagnosis. This affected one, Resident (#73) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included intervertebral disc disorder with radiculopathy in the lumbar region, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Type Two Diabetes Mellitus, alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver with ascites, generalized muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Additional review of Resident #73's medical record revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment.Review of medication orders in Resident #73's medical record revealed an order for Lurasidone (antipsychotic) 20 milligram (mg) tablets, one tablet taken once a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of verbal abuse. This affected one, Resident (#2) out of five residents reviewed for freedom from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included frostbite with tissue necrosis of unspecified sites, vascular [NAME]-Danlos syndrome, chronic viral hepatitis, and major depressive disorder. Further review of Resident #2's medical record revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment.Review of the document, Care Conference dated 04/07/26 contained in Resident #2's medical record revealed no mention of staff making disrespectful comments regarding Resident #2's feet, and no mention of smell as an issue related to the resident's feet.Interview on 04/19/26 at 11:36 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a follow up appointment was scheduled in a timely manner for Resident #49. This affected one resident out of seven reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 91. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 had an admission date of 10/23/25 with diagnoses of, but not limited to, arthritis due to other bacteria, right hip, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, lumbar spina bifida with hydrocephalus, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, paraplegia, neurogenic bowel, heart failure, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, acute kidney failure, major depressive disorder, gastritis, anemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, narcolepsy, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #49 dated 01/29/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. The quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's water management plan, staff interview, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Toolkit for Controlling Legionella in Common Sources of Exposure (Legionella Control Toolkit), the facility failed to have an adequate water management plan. This had the potential to affect all 93 residents residing in the facility. The census was 93. Findings include: Review of the facility's Waterborne Pathogens Plan dated revised 01/07/24 revealed the hot water temperatures ranges to be checked, 105 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 120 degrees F, was not a preventative range for Legionella growth. Further review revealed there was not a specified timeframe for temperature checks or control points of where temperatures would be taken. There was no specified temperature range to for hot water storage. There was no recommended flushing schedule of low-water flow or infrequently used areas and fixtures. Review of the CDC Legionella Control Toolkit revealed facilities should store hot water at temperatures above 140 degrees F and ensure hot water in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 05/19/23, with diagnoses of major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, schizophrenia, psychoactive substance abuse, anxiety, insomnia and unspecified mood disorder. Review of the care plan dated 10/27/23 revealed Resident #59 has diagnoses of anxiety with an intervention of maintaining a calm environment. Review of MDS assessment completed 01/17/25 revealed Resident #59 has a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident is cognitively intact. Review of functional abilities section revealed the resident requires supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene, toileting, and personal hygiene. Observation on 03/05/25 at 3:46 P.M., of Resident #59 revealed a significant buildup of scaling between the porcelain and the left handle of the sink faucet. This buildup prevented the sink from shutting off completely, causing a continuous flow of water to spill into the sink…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of policy, the facility did not have proper personal protective equipment in the laundry room to manage infectious material. Also, the facility did not follow proper isolation procedures for Resident #89. This had the potential to affect 87 residents of 89 residents in the facility. The facility identified two residents (#13 and #43) who did not have the facility launder their items. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Observation of the facility laundry room, on 03/04/25 at 8:32 A.M., revealed there was no personal protective equipment in the laundry room. Interview on 03/04/25 at 8:36 A.M., with Housekeeping Supervisor #340 confirmed there was no personal protective equipment in the laundry room for handling infectious materials. Interview with Laundry Aide #330 on 03/04/25 at 9:44 A.M., confirmed there was no personal protective equipment in the laundry room for handling infectious materials. Interview with Corporate Nurse #304 on 03/06/24 at 10:00 A.M., revealed on 03/04/25, there were two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to allow residents to refuse treatment without the threat of being discharged from the facility. This affected one (Resident #201) of two residents reviewed for dignity/rights. The census was 89. Findings include: Review of Resident #201's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/18/25. Resident #201's diagnoses included osteomyelitis, fusion of spine, asthma, discitis, intraspinal abscess and granuloma, arthritis due to other bacteria, methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus, bacteremia, viral hepatitis C, other psychoactive substance abuse, subluxation of L4/L5 (lumbar) vertebra, anemia, depression, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/25/25, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #201's Substance Use Disorder Program agreement revealed she signed the form to agree to substance use treatment in the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents were accurate to resident current conditions and diagnoses. This affected three (#3, #15, and #59) of four residents reviewed for PASARR documents. The census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/05/19. Her diagnoses included acute bronchitis, epileptic seizures, pulmonary embolism, post traumatic stress disorder, conversion disorder, phantom limb syndrome, bipolar disorder, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, hypothyroidism, hypertension, other cervical disc degeneration, vitamin D deficiency, insomnia, atrial fibrillation, nonrheumatic mitral valve prolapse, muscle weakness, hypotension, repeated falls, pain, type II diabetes, depression, macular degeneration, hypermetropia, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, acquired absence of right leg below knee, and epilepsy. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/09/24, revealed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all significant mental health changes were communicated to the state mental health agency. This affected three (#3, #15, and #59) of four residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents. The census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/05/19. Her diagnoses included acute bronchitis, epileptic seizures, pulmonary embolism, post traumatic stress disorder, conversion disorder, phantom limb syndrome, bipolar disorder, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, hypothyroidism, hypertension, other cervical disc degeneration, vitamin D deficiency, insomnia, atrial fibrillation, nonrheumatic mitral valve prolapse, muscle weakness, hypotension, repeated falls, pain, type II diabetes, depression, macular degeneration, hypermetropia, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, acquired absence of right leg below knee, and epilepsy. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/09/24, revealed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were obtained per physician orders. This affected two (#77 and #92) of five reviewed for nutritional monitoring. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #92 revealed an admission date of 11/12/24, with diagnoses of acute and subacute infective endocarditis, bacteremia, viral hepatitis, presence of heart valve replacement, rheumatic tricuspid insufficiency, shortness of breath, psychoactive substance use, hypertension, pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale and edema. Review of nutritional assessment review dated 11/15/24 revealed Resident #92's most recent weight measurement for Resident #92, taken on 11/12/24, showed a weight of 178 pounds. To help maintain a stable weight, interventions included fluid restriction, protein supplements three times daily, double protein with meals, a no-added-salt diet, and weekly weight monitoring. Review of the medical record for Resident #92 revealed the only weight taken by facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's respiratory needs were being met. This affected the one resident (#196) of one resident reviewed for oxygen use. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #196's medical record revealed an admission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified asthma, pulmonary embolism and heart failure. Review of Resident #196's census revealed she was hospitalized from [DATE] until 02/28/25. Review of Resident #196's physician orders revealed she was ordered to have a Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPap) face mask, humidified, oxygen at 3 liters per minute at bedtime starting on 01/30/25 and ending on 02/27/25. On 03/04/25, Certified Nurse Practitioner #350 entered orders for Resident #196 to have BiPap to be worn at bedtime. Resident #196's record was silent for BiPap orders from 02/28/25 until 03/04/25. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure communication between the facility and dialysis vendor regarding dialysis treatments was on going for continuity of care. This affected one (#24) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. Seven residents currently receive dialysis treatments. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed an admission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, chronic viral hepatitis C, hypertension and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #24's physician orders revealed a standing appointment for dialysis at an outside dialysis clinic three times weekly. Orders for nursing to complete a pre- and post-dialysis communication form on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Observation of Resident #24's hard chart on 03/04/25 at 3:24 P.M., revealed some post dialysis forms in the hard chart, but not in completion.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide parameters for as needed pain medication. This affected one (#3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 89. Findings Include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included acute bronchitis, epileptic seizures, pulmonary embolism, post traumatic stress disorder, conversion disorder, phantom limb syndrome, bipolar disorder, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, hypothyroidism, hypertension, other cervical disc degeneration, vitamin D deficiency, insomnia, atrial fibrillation, nonrheumatic mitral valve prolapse, muscle weakness, hypotension, repeated falls, pain, type II diabetes, depression, macular degeneration, hypermetropia, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, acquired absence of right leg below knee, and epilepsy. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/09/24, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #3 physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to secure and store medications appropriately. This affected one (#72) of 24 residents observed during the annual survey. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of Resident #72's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/06/23, with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, psychoactive substance abuse, disorientation, anxiety disorder and pain. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 was cognitively intact, mild depression, with no signs of psychosis noted. Review of records for Resident #72 revealed no assessment or screening for self - medication documented and there was no physician's order to administer self-medications. Observations on 03/04/25 at 9:12 A.M. noted a medicine cup with several tablets and capsules on the over bed table for Resident #72. Interview on 03/04/25 at 9:12 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility investigations, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse and misappropriation had thorough investigations and documentation of the investigation. This affected three residents (#86, #94, and #95) out of four residents reviewed for allegations of abuse and misappropriation. The facility census was 89. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 11/12/24 and a discharge date of 12/09/24. Diagnoses included surgical aftercare, endocarditis, bacteremia, shortness of breath, anxiety, and edema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 was cognitively intact with a BIMS of 15 and was independent with mobility. Review of the online Self-Reported Incident (SRI) #254189 dated 11/18/24 revealed Resident #94 reported, during a care conference with social services staff, that he had to wake up Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #55…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review and policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control procedures during a dressing change and while storing soiled laundry. This affected one (Resident #92) of three residents reviewed for wounds and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #92, revealed an admission date of 12/10/22. Diagnoses included but were not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, human immunodeficiency virus disease, pneumonia due to other gram-negative bacteria and methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of resident is rarely/never understood. The resident was assessed to require total dependence on all aspects of assisted with daily living care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, review of plumbing invoices, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and sanity environment in the shower room for the B hallway. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 93. Findings Include: Review of the plumbing company invoice #143340436 dated 11/12/24 revealed plumbing company arrived at the customers property for a shower drain back up. After attempting to cable the shower drain, the blockage was removed and restored flow to the drain. Review of the plumbing company invoice #143544314 dated 11/13/24 revealed the facility was experiencing emergency flooding in the B hallway over the course of three days. The plumbing company attempted to clear the main line using high pressure jetter and a camera to evaluate the line. Observation on 11/14/24 at 10:10 A.M. revealed the shower room located on the B hallway there were multiple ceramic tiles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, observation of facility video footage, review of the facility submitted Self-Reported Incident (SRI), and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an incident of potential neglect when the facility failed to timely implement fire protocol regarding rescuing residents, containing the fire and extinguishing and evacuating residents. This affected one Resident (#19) who had a fire in her room on 09/26/24 and had the potential to affect the other nine residents (Resident #11, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #21, #22, and #23) living in the same smoke compartment as Resident #19. The total facility census was 88. Findings included: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. Review of physician order dated 09/16/24 revealed Resident #19 had an order for oxygen at five liters per minute via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, review of facility camera footage, observation, review of a job description, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), and facility policy review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled the facility to utilize available resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This included failure to prevent neglect of residents by staff during a fire that occurred on 09/26/24, failure to ensure residents utilizing oxygen therapy were not able to possess lighters and smoking materials unsupervised, failure to timely and appropriately implement emergency procedures, when a fire occurred in Resident #19's room and ignited the resident's mattress/bedding on fire which ultimately activated the sprinkler system, including: rescuing residents in and near the fire, containing the fire from potentially spreading, alerting emergency personnel timely, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place. This affected one (Resident #22) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #22 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including seizures, delirium, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, edema, major depression, hyperlipidemia, and mild cognitive impairment. Review of a Morse Fall Scale assessment completed on 07/17/24 revealed Resident #22 was at high risk for falling. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #22 required assistance of one to two staff for transfers and was at risk for falls related to an unsteady gait with fall interventions including but not limited to bright colored tape to call light, defined perimeter mattress, non-skid footwear, fall mat to right side of bed, bed in lowest position, and keeping call light in reach. Observation on 08/16/24 at 1:05 P.M. revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy the facility failed to maintain proper infection control measures during medication administration. This affected two (Residents #22) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility also failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when appropriate. This one resident (Resident #28) of three residents reviewed for isolation precautions. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 05/05/23 with diagnoses of respiratory failure and muscle weakness. Resident #22 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks including medication administration and had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the physician orders for Resident #22 dated July 2023 revealed orders for the following medications to be given in the morning: Tylenol, Baclofen, Colace, folic acid, multivitamin, Zoloft, thiamine, vitamin D3, Gabapentin. Observation on 07/23/24 at 8:15 A.M. of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and photographs, the facility was not maintained in a clean, homelike environment and was not in good repair. This affected all 87 residents residing in the facility. The census was 87. Findings include: Review of Resident Council Meeting minutes dated 06/06/24 revealed room B27's sink had been broken for three months. Grievance sheet dated 06/12/24 revealed the sink was repaired on 06/14/24. Observations on 06/21/24 during the initial tour of the facility with Administrator present to confirm revealed the following: - 10 A.M. a missing transition strip to the dining room, the door frame was dirty and chipped, the dining room had peeling wallpaper, splatter marks throughout the dining room walls, two rusting ceiling vents with dust across the ceiling near the vents. - 10:03 A.M. the door to the therapy gym was chipping and jagged with a sharp edge, the wallpaper near the trashcan in the therapy gym was peeling and stained brown. - 10:05 A.M. on the C hallway revealed room C10's floor was dirty with mud and tire marks from a motorized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to assist one female resident with shaving her face. This affected one resident (#44) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 87. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #44 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including other sequela of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting left dominant side, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type II diabetes. Review of an admission minimum data set (MDS) completed on 06/03/24 revealed Resident #44's cognition was intact, she did not refuse care, and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene including combing hair, shaving, applying makeup, washing face and hands. Observation and interview on 06/21/24 at 12:13 P.M. with Resident #44 revealed she had not been shaved since her admission because there were no supplies. Resident #44 stated an aide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered without significant errors. This affected one (Resident #96) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #96 revealed an admission date of 01/11/24, with diagnoses including seizure disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and dependence on respirator(ventilator). Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #96 dated 01/17/24 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan for Resident #96 dated 01/12/24 revealed the resident had a seizure disorder. Interventions included to give seizure medication as ordered by doctor and to monitor for side effects and effectiveness. Review of physician orders for Resident #96 revealed an order dated 02/03/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the contact information for the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident, resident representative information, advanced directives information, all special instructions or precautions for ongoing care and all other necessary information to ensure a safe and effective transition of care was communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider upon transfer/discharge. This affected three (Residents #90, #91, and #92) out of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #90's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses which included respiratory failure, tracheostomy, dependence on respirator (ventilator), history of Covid-19, type two diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and hypertension. Resident #90 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Resident #90's progress notes, dated [DATE], revealed at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives were notified of medication changes. This affected one (Resident #1) out of three residents reviewed for medications. The census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an initial admission date of 10/10/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, end stage renal disease, dependence on dialysis, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, type one diabetes mellitus, and seizures. Review of Resident #1's acute care hospital discharge instructions revealed orders, dated 10/10/23, for Keppra (medication used to control seizures) 100 milligrams (mg)/milliliter (ml) with the special instructions to give five ml via peg-tube twice daily and Keppra 100 mg/ml with special instructions to give 2.5 ml via peg-tube daily every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Review of Resident #1's physician orders, dated 10/11/23, revealed an order for Keppra 100 mg/ml with special instructions to give 2.5 ml via peg-tube daily every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a recapitulation of a resident's stay when the resident had a planned discharge. This affected one (Resident #93) out of one sampled resident who had a planned discharge to the community. The census was 91. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #93 revealed an initial admission date of 08/15/23 with diagnoses including acute and subacute endocarditis, cerebral infarction, congestive heart failure, psychoactive substance abuse, hypertension, chronic viral hepatitis C, edema, diarrhea, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, muscle wasting, generalized muscle weakness, depression and pain. Resident #93 was discharged home with her daughter on 09/16/23. Review of the plan of care, dated 08/16/23, revealed Resident #93 would have a discharge plan. Interventions included all discharges were to be documented as well as document all discussions with family and resident regarding discharge plans. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to routinely assess pressure ulcers as well as ensure wound assessments included a description of the wound. This affected three (#48, #92, and #93) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Additionally, the facility failed to initiate treatment for a pressure ulcer in a timely manner. This affected one (#92) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #92 revealed an initial admission date of 05/19/23 with a latest readmission date of 08/27/23. Resident #92's diagnoses included but were not limited to end stage renal disease (ESRD), diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, dependence on renal dialysis, seizures, muscle wasting, and congestive heart failure. Review of the plan of care, dated 05/22/23, revealed Resident #92 was at risk for skin breakdown related to decreased mobility. Interventions included encourage Resident #92 to float heels as tolerated, house barrier cream with each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on closed record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a receipt of disposition for narcotic pain medication upon discharge from the facility. This affected one (Resident #93) out of one resident reviewed for planned discharge. The census was 91. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #93 revealed an initial admission date of 08/15/23 with diagnoses including acute and subacute endocarditis, cerebral infarction, congestive heart failure, psychoactive substance abuse, hypertension, chronic viral hepatitis C, edema, diarrhea, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, muscle wasting, generalized muscle weakness, depression and pain. Resident #93 was discharged home with her daughter on 09/16/23. Review of Resident #93's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/22/23, revealed Resident #93 had no cognitive impairment. Review of the resident's progress note dated 09/16/23 at 3:45 P.M. revealed the resident was discharged home at 2:30 P.M. The resident was provided discharge instructions and a list of their orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a clean and comfortable living environment. This affected five (#10, #32, #33 and #34) of 85 residents residing in the facility. The census was 85. Findings include: Observation during a tour of the facility, on 08/10/23 from 10:10 A.M. to 10:30 A.M., revealed a strong urine-like odor in the hallway of rooms of Resident #10, #22, #32, #33 and #34. Observation of Resident #32's room confirmed the strong odor emanates from her room. Observation and interview on 08/10/23 at 12:55 P.M., with Unit Manager #100 confirmed there was a urine odor in the hallway in front of the Resident #10, #32, #33 and #34's rooms. Observation and interview on 08/10/23 at 4:00 P.M., with Housekeeping Supervisor #104 and Administrator verified the urine odor in the hallway outside of Resident #10, #32, #33 and #34 rooms. The Administrator confirmed the odor emanates from Resident #32's room. The housekeeper Supervisor #104 explained the rooms are cleaned frequently and it is the responsibility of her staff to indicate if a deep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete quarterly care conferences for residents. This affected two (Residents #16 and #18) of two residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 04/12/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), schizoaffective disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, depression, mood disorder, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #16 had moderate cognitive impairment evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine. Resident #16 was assessed to require two-person extensive assistance with transfers, one-person extensive assistance with dressing, toileting, and bathing, and was independent with eating. Review of the care plan dated 07/20/22 revealed Resident #16 had hemiplegia/hemiparesis. Interventions included to assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, hospital staff interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident attended scheduled medical appointments. This affected one (Resident #71) of three residents reviewed for medical appointments. The census was 87. Findings include: Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included venous insufficiency, peripheral vascular disease, lymphedema, type II diabetes, atherosclerosis, cardiomyopathy, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, heart failure, and other psychoactive substance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #71 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #71's hospital records dated 05/19/22, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility for therapy and follow-up services related to a right lower leg wound. Review of Resident #71's progress notes revealed he complained of shortness of breath on 02/13/23, 02/27/23, and 03/07/23. Further review revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$196,256 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $196,256 — penalty dated 2024-10-29
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-27 for 49 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GARDEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHICKIESTRONG VICTORIAN VILLAGE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST80%since 12/30/2016
GAMZEH, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER5%since 12/30/2016
GLATZER, AKIVAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 12/30/2016
ISHWAR, KIMBERLYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/30/2016
LAHASKY, EPHRAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/30/2016
LESHKOWITZ, ELIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/30/2016
GARDEN HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/30/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$588K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 27%Medicare 4%Other / private 69%

This home reported $588K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$283per resident / day
operating cost
$8,593per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$293per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365315. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next