No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Prestige Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

755 South Plum Street, Marysville, OH 43040 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (937) 644-8836 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 644-8836 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2025Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
500 London Ave · (937) 578-2207 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
500 London Ave · (937) 578-4281 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
700 Milford Ave · (937) 642-0070 · Call to confirm hours
Park
401 E 9th St · (937) 645-7350 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
645 Chestnut St · (937) 642-2581

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms97.0%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%6.1%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.0%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.0%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.2%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.7%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.9%12.9%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.6%CMS range 39.5–72.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.8–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.291.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.64
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
42.1%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 66.1 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

21
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-13)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2022-06-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-05-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pain was adequately addressed and managed for a resident with complaints of pain. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #159 experienced severe breakthrough pain from a fractured tibia and fibula and was not assessed for pain or offered pain relieving interventions, including medications, to treat the resident's pain. The resident was observed multiple times displaying outward expressions of pain including moaning, tearfulness, and fist-clinching, during general observations and during direct care. This affected one (#159) of two residents reviewed for pain. The census was 56. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #159 revealed an admission date of 01/15/25. Diagnoses included heart failure, renal insufficiency, diabetes, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a multi-use glucometer was cleaned with the appropriate cleansing wipes during use for multiple residents. This affected two (Residents #21 and #16) of two residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 66.Findings include: Observation of medication administration on 06/23/26 between 7:19 A.M. and 8:13 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #110 cleaned the multi-use glucometer with an alcohol wipe prior to obtaining a blood sugar measurement for Resident #21. After LPN #110 obtained a blood sugar measurement for Resident #21, LPN #110 cleaned the multi-use glucometer with an alcohol wipe. LPN #110 then obtained the a blood sugar measurement for Resident #16 with the same multi-use glucometer. Interview with LPN #110 at the time of the observation confirmed the glucometer was a multi-use glucometer and was used for all residents that required blood sugar measurements on the 200 hall. LPN #110 confirmed he used alcohol wipes to clean the multi-use glucometer. LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation, review of facility policy and review of manufacture guidelines, the facility failed to ensure an assessment or evaluation for a reasonable accommodation of need regarding a bed handrail was completed. This affected one resident (#43) out of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 63.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 02/24/25. Diagnoses included total retinal detachment of left eye, asthma, chronic ischemic heart disease, and acute on chronic systolic heart failure.Review of the plan of care dated 02/25/25 revealed Resident #43 required a two person assist for transfers. The plan of care also identified the resident had behaviors related to refusals of treatment and preferred the bed in the highest position despite education on risks of injury due to falling. Interventions included educating the resident on risks of keeping the bed in the highest position and encouraging…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely assess a resident after a fall and timely document the fall in the residents medical record. This affected one (Resident #14) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 63.Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 08/23/24. Diagnoses included Huntington's disease, hypothyroidism, constipation, and dementia.Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was at risk for falls.Review of the plan of care dated 08/26/24 revealed the resident was at risk for falls due to increased need for assistance with bed mobility and transfers, Huntington's disease, overactive bladder, and history of falls. Interventions included ensuring the call light was within reach, use of bolsters to the left side and bottom of the bed, dycem to the wheelchair, ensuring the resident was sitting fully back in the wheelchair prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide palatable meals to the residents. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents living in the facility whom all ate meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Observation of a lunch test tray meal on 05/07/25 at 11:52 A.M. revealed the meatloaf served was dark, crunchy, and dry. Interview with Regional Director of Dining Services #150 on 05/07/25 at 11:58 A.M. confirmed the meatloaf was dry. He stated it stayed in the oven too long. Interview with three (#46, 51, and 53) residents on 05/07/25 from 12:00 P.M. to 12:06 P.M. confirmed the meatloaf served to them was dry, crunchy, and cut too thin. Review of an undated facility policy titled, Food Presentation, revealed meals will be served in a manner that enhances the appetite through eye appeal. Foods are prepared to prevent overcooking of foods. Each item is checked for proper temperature, taste and consistency prior to serving time.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices in handling soiled linens, sanitizing glucometers, and providing care of a gastrostomy tube. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility. The census was 56. Findings included: 1. Observation on 05/08/25 at 5:10 A.M. revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #26 was walking in the 400 hall while carrying unbagged linens. Interview on 05/08/25 at 5:11 A.M. with CNA #26 confirmed he was carrying unbagged linens and recently walked out of a resident's room. CNA #26 confirmed dirty linens were to be placed in a bag prior to leaving a resident's room. Review of facility policy for soiled laundry and bedding, dated July 2009, revealed contaminated or potentially contaminated laundry is to be placed in a bag or container a the location were it is used and transport contaminated laundry in bags or containers. 2. During an observation of medication administration for Resident #32 on 05/08/25 at 6:15 A.M. revealed Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of infection control logs, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an adequate and complete antibiotic stewardship program was implemented to monitor for possible infections within the facility and determine appropriateness of antibiotic use. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility infection logs dated between November 2024 and April 2025 revealed the facility did not include any other possible infectious findings or residents with possible symptoms of an infection that were not started on antibiotics. The facility only included those residents who were started on an antibiotic medication on their infection control tracking logs. Further review revealed the facility also did not include the start date of any symptoms of possible infections what the symptoms were, and the logs did not include whether a chest x-ray or laboratory values were ordered and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-13 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of employee files, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a certified nurse aide (CNA) completed no less than twelve (12) hours of required in-servicing education each year. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents in the facility. The census was 56. Findings include: Review Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/25/21. The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicative of intact cognition. Interview with Resident #15 on 05/06/25 at 10:25 A.M. revealed she had experienced CNA #22 treating her in a disrespectful manner in the recent past. Resident #15 indicated she did not feel threatened. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 05/01/23 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident concerns were addressed timely and appropriately during resident council meetings. This affected six Residents (#5, #15, #17, #27, #35 and #44) that regularly attend resident council meetings. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Interview on 05/06/25 at 10:01 A.M. with Resident #30 revealed the facility staff do not respond to call lights timely. Interview on 05/06/25 at 11:10 A.M. with Resident #13 reported the facility had issues with smoke breaks including missing them, being late, and not allowing them to be long enough. He revealed the facility did not address concerns in a timely manner. Interview on 05/08/25 at 11:03 A.M. with Activity Director #16 confirmed resident have the same concerns brought up each resident council meeting including call light response times and issues with the smoke break. She revealed after the council meeting she completes the top part portion of a resident concern form and provides the form to the Administrator who passes them out to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-13 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their personal care needs account on an ongoing basis. This had the potential to affect all 24 (#01, #04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #10, #13, #14, #16, #19, #21, #22, #23, #25, #26, #28, #35, #36, #38 , #39, #42, #44, and #162) residents who have authorized the facility to [NAME] their personal financial accounts. The census was 56. Findings Include: An interview on 05/08/25 at 9:15 A.M. with the Business Office Manager #20 (BOM) confirmed the banking hours for residents to receive funds from their personal care needs account are 10:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. Monday through Friday. She denied knowing if residents could get money out of their accounts on weekends or after 3:00 P.M. during the weekdays. An interview on 05/08/25 at 10:00 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed banking hours for residents to withdraw money from their personal care accounts is Monday through Sunday 10:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. He denied anyone being able to get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a homelike dining environment in the main dining room, this affected eight residents that were identified as eating lunch in the dining room (Resident #5, #6, #7, #21, #28, #35, #36, and #41). The facility also failed to ensure clean linens were provided to one (Resident #309) of nine (Resident #4, #10, #14, #18, #19, #36, #50, and #51) residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 56 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/05/25 at 11:41 A.M. of the dining room during lunch time revealed an unclean un-homelike environment when the following was observed: a full-size refrigerator with a padlock locking mechanism on the outside of it. On the refrigerator there was dry food and dust . A counter housing a sink revealed four dishes dirty with dry food , silverware, and cups from the breakfast service were present. In the far-right corner of the dining room closest to the entry to the kitchen revealed a mop bucket with a dirty mop and dirty water in it. Beside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide dignity during dining when staff was standing over a resident while assisting with feeding. This affected one resident (Resident #16) out of six residents (#7, #12, #14, #15, #16, #36) reviewed for dignity. The census was 56 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #16's quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11, indicative of mildly impaired cognition. MDS assessment further revealed Resident #16 was independent for eating. Review of Resident #16's self care deficit care plan dated 06/22/22 revealed she was at risk for self care deficit related to an increased need for assistance with her activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to protect a resident (Resident #14) after an allegation of verbal abuse by a staff member and continued to let the staff member work at the facility. This affected one resident, Resident #14, out of three residents (#15, and #16) reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 01/16/23. Diagnoses included carcinoma in situ of esophagus, severe protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, depression, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease stage III, vascular dementia, alcohol abuse, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, metabolic encephalopathy, and acquired AKA (above the knee amputation). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 is cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 and required one person assist with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews and facility policy and procedures review, the facility failed to ensure the physician and or prescribing practitioner documented a rationale in the resident's medical record for the use of a psychotropic drug for 180 days. This had the potential to affect one (Resident #4) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 56. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 11/04/22 with mild cognitive deficits. Diagnoses included traumatic hemorrhage of the cerebrum, hemiplegia and hemiplegia, acute chronic respiratory and obstructive pulmonary disease. A care plan relative to her physical and psychological needs revealed individualized interventions with measurable goals. Review of the Consultant Pharmacist Recommendation to Physician dated 7/16/24 and 2/11/25. The pharmacist requested a recommended reorder for specific number of days for the as needed (PRN) order of Lorazepam (antianxiety) 1 milligram (mg) for Resident #4 or to discontinue the medication per federal guideline.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 01/16/23. Diagnoses included carcinoma in situ of esophagus, severe protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, depression, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease stage III, vascular dementia, alcohol abuse, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, metabolic encephalopathy, and acquired AKA (above the knee amputation). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 is cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 and required one person assist with activities of daily living and had no history of behaviors. Review of facility self reported incidents (SRI)s revealed no submission related to verbal abuse allegation involving Resident #14. Telephone interview on 05/06/25 at 9:43 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #51 revealed she witnessed very concerning behavior from CNA #22 a little less than one month ago. CNA #51 stated that she overheard CNA #22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 01/16/23. Diagnoses included carcinoma in situ of esophagus, severe protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, depression, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease stage III, vascular dementia, alcohol abuse, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, metabolic encephalopathy, and acquired AKA (above the knee amputation). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 is cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 and required one person assist with activities of daily living and had no history of behaviors. Interview with Regional Operations Director #154 on 05/06/25 at 09:29 A.M. revealed no reports of abuse in the last month. Review of the facility's Self Reported Incidents (SRI)s revealed there was no report completed regarding Resident #14 in regards to verbal abuse. Telephone interview on 05/06/25 at 09:43 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #51…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 01/16/23. Diagnoses included carcinoma in situ of esophagus, severe protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, depression, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease stage III, vascular dementia, alcohol abuse, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, metabolic encephalopathy, and acquired AKA (above the knee amputation). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 and required one person assist with activities of daily living and had no history of behaviors. Telephone interview on 05/06/25 at 09:43 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #51 revealed she witnessed very concerning behavior from CNA #22 a little less than one month ago. CNA #51 stated that she overheard CNA #22 get into a verbal disagreement with Resident #14 and Resident #27 in the TV room/hallway and it escalated when that aide got into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate and pertinent information was communicated to the receiving health care institution during a resident transfer. This had the potential to affect one (#57) of five residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility census was 56. Finding Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 01/30/24. Diagnoses included arthritis due to other bacteria of the right knee, chronic pain, acute kidney failure, unspecified low back pain, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, multiple myeloma, hypertension, pneumonia, ileus, unspecified muscle weakness. Review of physician orders dated 02/04/25 revealed routine laboratory values were ordered to assess Resident #57's hemoglobin (an iron-containing protein found in red blood cells that is responsible for transporting oxygen throughout the body) levels. Review of additional orders on 02/07/25 revealed Resident #57 was to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete and provide a bed hold notice and reason for transfer to residents and resident representative and failed to notify the long-term care ombudsman of a resident transfer as required. This affected three (#57, #56, and #12) of five residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility census was 56. Finding include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 01/30/24. Diagnoses included arthritis due to other bacteria of the right knee, chronic pain, acute kidney failure, unspecified low back pain, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, multiple myeloma, hypertension, pneumonia, ileus, and unspecified muscle weakness. Review progress notes dated 02/04/25 revealed Resident #57's hemoglobin (an iron-containing protein found in red blood cells that is responsible for transporting oxygen throughout the body) was 7.6 grams per deciliter (g/dL) on 01/30/25 and laboratory values were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents were accurately completed for two (#23 and #27) of five residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 56. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 03/21/23. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder (added 03/21/23), insomnia, diabetes, cognitive communication deficit, and encephalopathy. Review of Resident #23's PASARR dated 03/17/23 revealed the only diagnosis marked was mood disorder. Interview on 05/05/25 at 5:15 P.M. with Admissions #18 and Social Service Designee (SSD) #126 confirmed PASARR should be reviewed for accuracy at admission and updated for any changes in diagnosis during the admission. Both staff members confirmed Resident #23 PASARR document was not accurate. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 09/21/18. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, depression, cognitive communication deficit, schizophrenia (added 11/22/23), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 03/21/23. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, diabetes, cognitive communication deficit, encephalopathy and insomnia. Review of Resident #23's plan of care dated 03/22/23 revealed the nutritional care plan had no intervention changes or updates in over two years in which time resident had significant weight loss of over 20 pounds, or 12.22 percent (%) weight loss, in six months. The interventions in the current care plan included monitoring for weight loss and to make diet recommendations as needed. Review Resident #23's progress notes revealed no notes regarding nutrition from 03/27/24 to 03/05/25. Review of a note dated 03/05/25 revealed the resident had excessive weight loss and a second weight was requested to confirm weight loss. Review of a note dated 03/12/25 revealed weight loss was acceptable and the resident went from an overweight body max index (BMI) to a healthy BMI. The note continued to begin weekly weights and monitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed physician orders for use of and documented use of specialized devices to aid in turning and repositioning as a pressure ulcer prevention intervention. This had the potential to affect one (#30) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 56. Finding Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 02/22/25. Diagnoses included hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, malignant neoplasm of bilateral ovaries, hypothyroidism, Crohn's disease, morbid obesity, difficulty walking, need for assistance with personal care, major depressive disorder, pressure ulcer of the right buttocks, chronic kidney disease, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, and total dependence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with adequate peri-care. This affected one (#161) of one residents reviewed for peri-care. The census was 56. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #161 revealed an admission date of 04/24/25. Medical diagnoses included pneumonia, hypertension, and diabetes. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #161 was cognitively intact and was assessed as continent for bowel and bladder. Observation of peri-care on 05/08/25 at 5:39 A.M. revealed Resident #161 was on the bedpan. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #500 revealed he placed on gloves and had cleansing wipes for the care. While the resident was still on the bed pan, CNA #500 wiped down each side of the resident's inner thigh area and did not touch either side of the resident's labia. He removed the bed pan and rolled the resident to the left side and provided care to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide complete information requested. This affected one (#159) of one residents reviewed for medical record documentation. The census was 56. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #159 revealed an admission date of 01/15/25. Medical diagnoses included heart failure, renal insufficiency, diabetes, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #159 was cognitively intact. The resident's functional status was assessed as setup or clean up assistance for eating, dependent for toileting and transfers, and substantial/maximal assistance for bed mobility. Resident #159 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. During an interview and observation on 05/05/25 at 12:16 P.M. revealed Receptionist #116, who also was the appointment scheduler, pulled out the appointment book and showed the surveyor a date on a paper with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, review of the facility handbook, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident personal and medical information was kept confidential. This affected four (Residents #18, #23, #36 and #37) of five records reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 08/29/23 with diagnoses including [NAME]-Danlos Syndrome, anxiety disorder, protein-calorie malnutrition, dysuria, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 12/08/23 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required limited assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of email records revealed the Administrator sent an email on 02/19/24 regarding Resident #10 with an attached Medicaid Pending Log to Resident #10, Ombudsman #107, Corporate [NAME] Representative #501, Hearing Officer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff, hospice staff and family interviews, the facility failed to administer a residents medications per physician orders. This affected one (#79) of three residents reviewed for medication administration who received hospice services. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #79 revealed admission [DATE] and discharged on 09/01/23. Diagnoses include pathological fracture hip, cerebral atherosclerosis, umbilical hernia, altered mental status, chronic kidney disease stage three, hypokalemia, gout, insomnia, arthritis, and anxiety. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #79 dated 08/05/23 revealed a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #79 required extensive assistance for activities of daily living with exception of supervision for eating. Review of care plan for Resident #79 revealed admit to hospice due to cerebral atherosclerosis. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, review of manufacturer's directions, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prime an insulin pen prior to administration per manufacturer recommendation. This affected one (Resident #27) of four residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 10/06/23 with diagnoses included acute kidney failure, anemia, type two diabetes, hypertension, cellulitis, and unspecified open wound of scrotum and testes. Review of December physician orders for Resident #27 revealed humano kwikpen 100 units/milliliter (ml) per slicing scale 150-200 give 2 units, 201-250 give 4 units, 251-300 give 6 units, 301-350 give 8 units, and 351-400 give 10 units. Any blood sugar above 400 and below 60 notify the physician. Twice daily. Insulin Glargine (lantus) subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit/ml, inject 32 units subcutaneously one time a day for diabetes type two. Review of the Care Plan dated 10/27/23 for Resident #27…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served using the correct serving size, and failed to ensure mechanical soft and pureed meals were prepared according to a recipe. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (Resident #16 and #276) who received nothing by mouth and did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 71. Findings include Observation and interview on 06/01/22 at 11:01 A.M. with [NAME] #6 revealed the facility had four pureed meal orders and five mechanical soft meal orders. [NAME] #6 placed four four ounce (oz) scoops of green beans into the blender, with an unmeasured amount of water which appeared to be roughly a tablespoon, and blended them to a pureed consistency. [NAME] #6 then placed three breaded chicken tenders in the blender and blended them to a mechanical soft consistency. [NAME] #6 then scooped out an unmeasured amount of the blended chicken for the mechanical soft diets and placed the mechanical soft…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (Resident #16 and #276) who received nothing by mouth and did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 71. Findings include 1. Observation on 06/01/22 at 11:01 A.M. of [NAME] #6 preparing the pureed meal items revealed [NAME] #6 placed four four ounce (oz) scoops of green beans in the blender then blended them to a pureed texture. [NAME] #6 then rinsed the blender with water only. [NAME] #6 did not use soap or sanitizer when cleaning the blender and the blender was not dried. [NAME] #6 then placed three breaded chicken tenders in the blender and blended them to a pureed consistency. [NAME] #6 then rinsed the blender with water only. [NAME] #6 did not use soap or sanitizer when cleaning the blender and the blender was not dried. [NAME] #6 then placed one and a half four oz scoops of plain ziti pasta noodles in the blender with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-06 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility assessment and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment addressed the use of contract nursing staff to provide services. This had the potential to affect all 71 residents. The census was 71. Findings include: Review of the facility assessment, reviewed and revised on 03/17/22, revealed the facility assessment did not address the facilities use of contract (agency) nursing staff to provide services. Review of the daily assignment sheets provided by the facility during the survey week from 05/31/22 to 06/02/22 revealed the facility used agency nursing staff on 13 shifts. Interview with the Administrator on 06/01/22 at 11:30 A.M. verified the facility utilized agency nurses to provide services and confirmed the assessment does not include information regarding the facilities use of agency nursing staff even after it was reviewed and revised on 03/17/22.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of glucometer manufacture instructions, the facility failed to ensure the glucometer (machine used to test blood sugar level) was properly disinfected between residents. This affected four residents (Resident #45, #276, #277, and #281) out of 17 residents who resided on the 100 hall. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Observation of medication administration on 06/01/22 at 7:50 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #29 revealed LPN #29 set out four alcohol pads and lancets to test blood sugars for multiple residents. LPN #29 was observed to obtain a blood sugar for Resident #277 with the glucometer. LPN #29 returned to the medication cart and cleaned the glucometer (which was a 100 hall community machine) with an alcohol pad. The nurse then obtained a blood sugar for Resident #276, using the same machine. LPN #29 was getting ready to test Resident #45 and Resident #281 and was stopped by the state surveyor. LPN #29 was asked if she cleaned the glucometer with anything other than an alcohol pad. LPN #29 identified no,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the stand up scale was properly maintained. This had the potential to affect all 24 residents (Resident #3, #4, #8, #9, #10, #16, #17, #18, #19, #21, #28, #29, #30, #32, #36, #40, #41, #46, #47, #53, #58, #60, #61, and #77) who could utilize the stand up scale and resided on the 300/400 hallway. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Observation of Resident #36 being weighed on the stand up scale on 06/02/22 at 9:33 A.M. with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #216 revealed Resident #36 was able to stand on the scale, however the scale was observed to tilt forward and was wobbling. STNA #216 confirmed the scale was broken and turned the scale over to discover there was a missing leg under the base of the scale. The scale was observed to have three loose legs and one leg was missing. Interview with Maintenance Director #64 was completed on 06/02/22 at 1:17 P.M. The interview confirmed he was notified the scale was not working properly on Monday 05/31/22 and placed it in the shower room on the 300/400 hallway.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate code status in the paper medical record and electronic medical record. This affected one (Resident #5) out of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 71. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 11/15/21. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, failure to thrive, vascular dementia, kidney disease, and adjustment disorder. Review of the Do Not Rescucitate (DNR) paperwork dated 11/18/21 signed by the physician revealed Resident #5 had elected DNR comfort care code status. Review of the Physician Order dated 11/28/21 revealed Resident #5 had a code status order for DNR comfort care arrest. Interview on 05/31/22 at 12:20 P.M. with [NAME] President of Clinical Services #75 revealed Resident #5 ' s advanced directives and code status in the electronic medical record do not match the DNR form signed by the physician. Review of policy titled Advanced Directives, dated 12/2016, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an updated Preadmission Screening and Resident Review for a resident with a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder. This affected one (Resident #49) out of one resident reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 09/17/16. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, hypokalemia, major depressive disorder, cerebral infarction, and essential hypertension. Resident #49 had a diagnosis of Schizoaffective disorder, depressive type added on 11/18/21. Review of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Result Notice dated 06/01/22 revealed a referral was made for a level II evaluation. Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed no evidence of a new PASRR having been completed prior to 06/01/22 since Resident #49's new diagnosis of Schizoaffective disorder, depressive type on 11/18/21. Interview on 06/01/22 at 3:09 P.M. Social Services Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-06 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, policy review, and review of a job description, the facility failed to implement an effective and timely discharge planning process. This affected one (Resident #43) of two residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 03/13/22. Diagnoses included asthma, diabetes type two, COVID-19, guillain-barre syndrome, and respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was cognitively intact and required extensive assist of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. Review of the care plan dated 04/01/22 revealed Resident #43 was anticipated as a short term stay at the facility with discharge anticipated back home to the community with services and HME (home medical equipment) needed with interventions to document all discharge planning, and document all interactions with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance with eating. This affected one (Resident #36) out of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed admission to the facility occurred on 07/23/20. Resident #36 had medical diagnoses including dementia, high blood pressure, and coronary artery disease. Review of Resident #36's most recent quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #36's speech therapy discharge instructions dated 04/13/22 revealed Resident #36 required concrete one step directions. Observation of Resident #36's lunch meal on 05/31/22 at 12:26 P.M. revealed Resident #36 was in bed with her lunch tray. Resident #36 was not provided any assistance including opening her milk carton. The observation revealed Resident #36 ate no food and drank half of a nutritional shake before her tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders prior to completing wound treatments. This affected one (Resident #427) out of two residents reviewed for skin concerns. The facility census was 71. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #427 revealed an admission date of 05/27/22. Diagnoses included lumbar vertebra fracture, vascular disease, and absence of fingers. Review of Resident #427's care plan dated 05/27/22 revealed Resident #427 was at risk for skin breakdown with interventions including skin assessment as needed and provide supplements as ordered. Review of the progress note dated 06/01/22 revealed Resident #427 had wounds with dressings to bilateral arms. Review of Resident #427's physician orders dated 06/01/22 revealed an order for skin tear to left arm with instructions to pat dry and apply oil emulsion dressing and ABD pad wrap with bandage roll and change daily until healed. Review of Resident #427's physician order dated 06/01/22 revealed skin tear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-06 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision. The affected one (Resident #18) out of one resident reviewed for vision services. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 01/27/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, diabetes type two, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had mild cognitive impairment. Review of the 360 eye visit schedule and resident list revealed Resident #18 was seen by the eye physician on 03/04/22. Review of the documents from 360 vision professionals revealed Resident #18 was assessed and provided a new eye prescription. Interview on 05/31/22 at 11:08 A.M. with Resident #18's wife revealed Resident #18 had seen the eye doctor at the facility about three months ago and had not heard of an update…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments, monitor wound progress, and timely implement interventions for pressure ulcers. This affected one (Resident #43) out of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 03/13/22. Diagnoses included diabetes type two, COVID-19, lymphedema, and guillain-barre syndrome. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was cognitively intact and required extensive assist of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. Review of the care plan dated 04/01/22 revealed Resident #43 was at risk for skin breakdown due to decreased mobility with interventions including encourage resident to turn and reposition as tolerated, observe skin for signs and symptoms of breakdown and document and notify the physician,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were provided as ordered. This affected one (Resident #36) out of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed admission to the facility occurred on 07/23/20. Resident #36 had medical diagnoses including dementia, high blood pressure, and coronary artery disease. Review of Resident #36's most recent quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had severe cognitive impairment. The assessment revealed Resident #36 had unintended weight loss. Review of Resident #36's physician orders dated 09/15/20 revealed an order for house supplement (House Shake/Nutritional Shake) three times a day. Review of Resident #36's physician order dated 03/06/22 revealed an order for nutritional treat (ice cream nutritional supplement) two times a day. Review of Resident #36's Nutritional Notes dated 03/06/22 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of manufacture instructions, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered according to manufactures instructions. This affected one (Resident #281) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Observation of medication administration on 06/01/22 at 7:50 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #29 revealed LPN #29 obtained Resident #281's blood sugar which was found to be at 380 milligrams/deciliter. LPN #29 then obtained Resident #281's insulin pen, added a new needle and adjusted the dosage to 10 units. LPN #29 was then observed to administer the 10 units of Novolog insulin to Resident #281. Upon returning to the medication cart, LPN #29 was asked about priming the insulin pen prior to administration and LPN #29 confirmed she did not prime the insulin pen prior to administration and was not aware of the need to do so. Review of the Novolog flex pen (insulin pen) manufactures instructions revealed in the steps for administration; step seven priming, turn the dose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of pharmacy medication reviews, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was aware and responded to pharmacy medication reviews/recommendations in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #28) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed admission to the facility occurred on 07/23/21 with medical diagnoses including diabetes, depression, high blood pressure, dementia, and Covid-19 infection (03/17/22). Review of Resident #28's Medication Regimen revealed he was receiving Aricept (a medication used to treat dementia in people who have Alzheimer's disease) five milligrams (mg) daily for the diagnosis of dementia. Review of Resident #28's Medication Administration Record for May 2022 and June 2022 confirmed Resident #28 was receiving Aricept five mg daily. Review of a pharmacy review/recommendation dated 04/23/22, revealed on 03/20/22 a new order for Resident #28 to receive Aricept five mg at bedtime was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-06 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory testing as ordered. This affected one (Resident #28) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed admission to the facility occurred on 07/23/21 with medical diagnoses including diabetes, major depression, high blood pressure, and Covid-19 (03/17/22). Review of Resident #28's physician orders dated 11/14/21 revealed orders for blood laboratory testing of Complete Blood Count (CBC), Metabolic Panel (BMP), and Hemoglobin A1C (measures average blood glucose levels), to be completed every three months. Review of the Resident #28's medical record revealed no evidence of any blood laboratory testing having been conducted since November 2021. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/02/22 at 1:55 P.M., confirmed the facility did not obtain Resident #28's blood laboratory testing (CBC, BMP, Hemoglobin A1C), every three months, as ordered by the physician. The interview confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were in working order. This affected one (Resident #28) out of 24 reviewed for functioning call lights. The facility census was 71. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 07/23/21. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, depression, hyperlipidemia, acute embolism, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was cognitively intact. Observation and interview on 05/31/22 at 9:27 A.M. with Resident #28 revealed Resident #28 was pressing his call light and reported staff were not responding. Resident #28 was observed to push the call light again and the light on the wall as well as the light outside door did not activate. Resident #28 revealed his call light had not been working for about a week and stated he had mentioned it to staff. Interview on 05/31/22 at 9:28 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-23 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical and facility record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide notification of resident's transfers to the hospital to the resident and/or representative and to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. This affected three (#24, #51 and #57) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 57. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included pressure ulcer sacral region, spina bifida unspecified, chronic osteomyelitis, paraplegia, morbid obesity, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/31/19, revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment. Further review of the record revealed Resident #24 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] for significant change in condition and returned to the facility on [DATE]. The medical record was silent of verification, that a notification of transfer, was provided in writing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-23 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or representative of the facility's bed hold policy. This affected one (#57) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Closed medical record review for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 02/23/19. Diagnoses included bacteremia, disorder of kidney and ureter, acute kidney failure, unspecified abdominal pain, disease of pancreas, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites, sepsis and acute pancreatitis without necrosis. Further review of the record revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital per squad after a significant change in condition on 02/28/19. The resident's wife was present at the time of the transfer. The medical record contained no documentation of the resident and/or representative having been provided with the bed hold policy at the time of transfer. Interview with Social Service Designee #510 on 05/22/19 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan addressed the use of an anticoagulant for Resident #305. This affected one (#305) of 16 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #305 revealed an admission date of 05/10/19 with diagnoses including heart failure, respiratory failure, coronary artery disease, and chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of lower extremity. Review of the medical record revealed an order dated 05/10/19 for Warfarin sodium, a medication used as a blood thinner, tablet six milligrams by mouth one time a day. Review of the baseline care plan for Resident #305, dated 05/10/19, revealed Warfarin use was not addressed on the baseline care plan. Interview on 05/23/19 at 10:48 A.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #305's baseline care plan did not address Warfarin use. During interview on 05/23/19 at 10:48 A.M. with DON, the DON agreed Resident #305's baseline care plan should have addressed the use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident's behavior of picking at her skin and facial lesions was addressed on the resident's plan of care. This affected one (#38) of 16 care plans reviewed during the survey. Findings include: Review of Resident # 38's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to facility on 01/06/16. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, vitamin B12 deficiency and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/10/19, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living including dressing and personal hygiene. Review of a weekly skin assessment, dated 05/22/19, indicated the resident had multiple scratches to her face. Review of the resident's care plan revealed it did not indicate the resident picked or scratched her face. Observation on 05/20/19 at 10:21 A.M. of Resident # 38 revealed she had lesions on her face. Interview on 05/22/19 at 1:45 P.M. with State Tested Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident's facial lesions were documented in the medical record, treated and monitored for improvement and failed to have hospice progress notes available for review for another resident. This affected one (#38) of two resident's reviewed for non-pressure skin issues and one (#8) of two residents reviewed for hospice services. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to facility on 01/06/16. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, vitamin B12 deficiency and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/10/19, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living including dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the resident's care plan revealed it did not indicate the resident picked or scratched her face. Review of weekly skin assessments, dated 05/13/19 and 05/20/19, revealed it did not indicate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were not administered for extended periods of time without attempts for gradual dose reductions for one (#14) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 10/08/15. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/12/19, revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and had no mood or behavior issues. Review of quarterly social service progress notes, from 01/02/18 to 04/03/19, reflected the resident was without mood or behavior issues. Review of physician progress notes from 04/16/19 to 05/29/18 revealed the resident was pleasant, alert and were silent to any mood or behavior problems. Review of current physician orders for Resident #14 revealed the resident had orders to receive an antianxiety medication named Buspar five milligrams (mg.) twice daily since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-05-23 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, policy review and record review, the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered to residents on Saturday. This had the potential to affect all 57 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Interviews on 05/22/19 at 3:13 P.M. with Resident #24, Resident #53, and Resident #47 revealed mail was not delivered to residents on Saturdays. Interview on 05/23/19 at 8:47 A.M. with Activities Supervisor #503 verified mail was not delivered to residents on Saturdays. Review of the facility policy titled Mail, last revised 12/31/16, revealed mail will be delivered to the resident within 24 hours of delivery on premises or to the facility's post office box including Saturday deliveries.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2019-05-23 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility assessment and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct and implement an annual facility assessment in a timely manner. This has the potential to affect all 57 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated assessment revealed the facility's antibiotic stewardship program was noted as 'in progress' on the assessment tool. Further review of the assessment revealed the facility's 'Infection Preventionist' will be certified in 2018. Interview on 05/22/19 at 1:40 P.M. with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility assessment had been completed by the prior Administrator and DON of the facility. The current DON verified she was not certified as the Infection Preventionist and stated the facility had completed an antibiotic stewardship program that was in place at the time of the survey. Per the Administrator and the DON, the previous administration had not completed an updated annual facility assessment since the last survey of 04/19/18 and the Administrator had not updated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GARDEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHICKIESTRONG MARYSVILLE GARDENS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST80%since 12/30/2016
GAMZEH, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER5%since 12/30/2016
GLATZER, AKIVAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 12/30/2016
SCALF-LEBER, STEPHANIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/30/2016
LAHASKY, EPHRAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/30/2016
LESHKOWITZ, ELIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/30/2016
GARDEN HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/30/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$564K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 26%Medicare 5%Other / private 70%

This home reported $564K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$293per resident / day
operating cost
$8,906per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$293per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365577. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next