Eastland Rehabilitation And Nursing Center
2425 Kimberly Parkway East, Columbus, OH 43232 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 93 certified beds · (614) 868-9306 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $207,789 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-28)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.5% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 93.0% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.1% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.6% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.8% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.5% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.5% | 8.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 41.7% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 86.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews with facility staff, review of laboratory test results, review of hospital records, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to provide timely, adequate, and necessary care and treatment to Resident #74 following laboratory notification of a critically low potassium level. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm on 09/08/23 when a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) laboratory blood test showed a critically low potassium level of 2.7 milliequivalents (meq)/hour (hr) (normal 3.5 to 5.3 meq/hr), and the facility failed to notify the physician or provide treatment until 09/15/23. On 09/15/23 Resident #74 was assessed to be dehydrated and had increased confusion which had worsened over the previous week. From 09/15/23 to 09/19/23 the facility failed to ensure physician orders related to a fluid bolus were clarified and failed to ensure nursing staff adequately monitored the resident. On 09/19/23 the resident was transferred to the hospital and treated for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer program to prevent the development and/or worsening of pressure ulcers and to ensure adequate and appropriate interventions/treatments were in place as ordered and to promote healing. This affected two residents (#40 and #49) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 76. Actual harm occurred beginning on 04/10/25 when Resident #49, who was cognitively impaired, rarely/never understood and dependent on staff for activities of daily living was assessed by Wound Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #1200 to have a Stage IV pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often includes undermining and tunneling.) to the sacrum. The resident had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Stage III pressure ulcer (An ulcer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of the facility Perineal Care policy and procedure and family and staff interview, the facility failed to implement adequate skin risk interventions, including timely incontinence care and treatment for Resident #34, who was cognitively impaired, at risk for pressure ulcer development and dependent on staff for turning and repositioning, to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer to the resident's coccyx. Actual harm occurred on 08/13/23 at 7:04 A.M. when a reddened area was noted to Resident #34's coccyx area without evidence of effective preventative measures being in place or additional interventions implemented at that time. On 08/14/23 at 10:13 P.M. the Wound Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) assessed Resident #34 to have a Stage III (full-thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) is visible in the ulcer. Slough and/or eschar may be visible) pressure ulcer to the coccyx. However, treatment orders were not implemented until 08/16/23 when an order was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of hospital records, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the medical record related to residents neurological assessments. This affected two Residents (#54 and #78) of three reviewed for falls. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), and psychotic disturbance. Review of Resident #78's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 03/01/26 indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed the resident suffered an unwitnessed fall that was discovered about 2:00 A.M. on 4/12/26 in which the resident suffered swelling and bruising to the left upper and lower eyelids in addition to a laceration (near) the left eye. As a result of the fall, Resident #78 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review and interview, the facility failed to timely report a change in condition to Resident #20's physician. This affected one resident (#20) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 83. Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 04/11/25 with medical diagnoses including dementia, major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type two diabetes mellitus, age-related osteoporosis, heart failure, and high blood pressure. Review of Resident #20's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 7 indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #20 required assistance with activities of daily living tasks. Review of the nursing progress notes dated 09/29/25 at 12:00 A.M. revealed Resident #20 was seen by the Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #225 due to pain and edema in her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review. The facility failed to store Insulin in a safe manner on the 100 and 300 hall medication carts. This had the potential to affect six residents (Residents #2, #14, #16, #36, #41 and #47) who received insulin on those halls. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Observation on 05/20/25 at 8:10 A.M. of 300 hall medication cart revealed the following medications in the top drawer: two Basaglar KwikPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine) with no resident identifier on the Insulin pen which was opened and undated ( date the pen was opened); Insulin Lispro Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) vial, no resident identifier on the vial which was opened and undated; Tresiba FlexTouch Pen-injector 100 UNITS/ML, with no resident identifier on the pen which was also opened and undated. Interview on 05/20/25 at 8:15 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #506 verified insulin vial and pens on 300 hall medication cart that were undated and had no resident identifiers. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 73 of 76 residents who ate food from the kitchen (Residents # 20, #42, and #55 were identified by the facility as not eating or drinking from the kitchen.) The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: Observation on 05/18/25 from 8:25 A.M. to 8:45 A.M. revealed the kitchen dry storage room had three cans of three bean salad, a case of hot dog buns, a case of sliced pineapple rings, and two cases of snack pack puddings that were stored directly on the floor. Interview with Dietary Aide #402 on 05/18/25 at 8:30 A.M. confirmed the above food items were stored directly on the floor in the kitchen's dry storage room. Further interview with Dietary Aide #402 revealed the food items were received at the facility on 05/16/25 and the food items had been stored on the floor since that date. Observation on 05/18/25 from 8:25 A.M. to 8:45 A.M. revealed there was a dusty light fixture over the steam wells in the food serving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were in place for Resident #49 who had pressure ulcer wounds while at the facility. This affected only Resident #49 who was reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. This had the potential to affect 10 residents on the same hall. The total facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #49, revealed an admission date of 04/03/25 and a transfer to the hospital date of 05/15/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to adult failure to thrive, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, metabolic encephalopathy, and difficulty walking. Review of the active care plans dated 04/03/25 revealed Resident #49 to be on enhanced barrier precautions related to chronic wounds. Review of the physician orders dated 04/03/25 through 05/15/25 for Resident #49 revealed no order for enhanced barrier precautions due to having chronic pressure ulcer wounds. Interview on 05/21/25 at 2:35 P.M. with Regional Administrator #417 verified no order was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical records review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide dignity with dining for two residents who needed assistance with their meals (Resident # 4 and #31) out of fourteen residents reviewed for dining observation. This had the potential to affect five residents (#4, #12, #21, #31, and #33) that needed assistance with dining. The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle wasting, and glaucoma. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #4's full nutrition assessment dated [DATE] revealed he requires assistance with his meals. Review of Resident #4's physician order dated 09/26/23 revealed he was to have assistance with all meals on every shift. Observation on 05/19/25 at 8:17 A.M. revealed Resident #4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision in the dining room for a resident who was at risk for choking. This affected one resident (Resident #33) and had the potential to affect 23 residents that the facility identified as having dysphagia, difficulty swallowing (Resident #2, #9, #12, #16, #22, #25, #28, #29, #33, #34, #38, #44, #46, #49, #59, #67, #71, #73, #74, #75, #78, #133, and #233.) The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #33's medical chart revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included abnormal posture, cognitive communication deficit, muscle wasting and atrophy, dysphagia, and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #33's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14, indicative of intact cognition. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that she required supervision or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to communicate with dialysis center and failed to perform pre and post dialysis assessments for one, Resident #29. This had the potential to affect four residents (Residents #6, #29, #31 and #36) who received dialysis. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed that he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dependent on renal dialysis and end stage renal disease. Review of Resident #29's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 annual assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #29's Physician's orders dated 04/25/25 revealed an order for dialysis in center every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 1:15 P.M. The orders did not indicate any before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper parameters were identified for as needed (PRN) pain medications. The deficient practice affected one resident (#26) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 08/23/24. Medical diagnoses included obesity, Type II Diabetes, anxiety, adjustment disorder, adult failure to thrive, lymphedema, hypertension, personal history of pulmonary embolism, and panniculitis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had intact cognition and scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment indicating intact cognition. Review of facility care plan for Resident #26 initiated 09/23/24 revealed Resident #26 had chronic pain due to his diagnoses and that medications should be administered as ordered. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to follow infection control practices when changing a dressing. This affected one resident (#78) of three sampled residents. The census was 89. Findings include: Review of Resident #78's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anterior cord syndrome at T7-T10 level of the thoracic spinal cord, atrial fib, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was moderately impaired. He requires setup/clean up assistance for meals and oral hygiene and is dependent for toileting, shower/bathing, upper body dressing, footwear, personal hygiene and turning and repositioning. He is frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. Review of the physicians orders for 12/06/24 revealed to cleanse wounds to the superior sternum with normal saline and pat dry. Then apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, review of Self-Reported Incident (SRIs), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure allegations of physical abuse were reported immediately to the state agency as required. This affected one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 87 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 08/08/20 with diagnoses including chronic systolic heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and anxiety disorder and a discharge date of 11/20/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #3 dated 11/17/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required supervision or touching assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the hospital note for Resident #3 dated 11/20/24 timed at 9:47 P.M. revealed the resident was admitted with complaints of back pain and alleged he had been pushed by an employee at the facility during an altercation on 11/18/24 which caused the resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, review of Self-Reported Incident (SRIs), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from further potential abuse during abuse investigations. This affected one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 87 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 08/08/20 with diagnoses including chronic systolic heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and anxiety disorder and a discharge date of 11/20/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #3 dated 11/17/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required supervision or touching assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the hospital note for Resident #3 dated 11/20/24 timed at 9:47 P.M. revealed the resident was admitted with complaints of back pain and alleged he had been pushed by an employee at the facility during an altercation on 11/18/24 which caused the resident to fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment of continence for a resident. This affected one of three residents reviewed for incontinence (Resident #27). The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 03/29/24 and diagnoses including diabetes, bipolar disorder, and septic arthritis of the left leg. Review of a nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed a question: How long has the resident been incontinent or had a catheter? it was documented N/A Continent. It further stated the resident was wet during day and night time, small amounts. It stated the resident was continent of bowel. No further information was documented related to bowel or bladder incontinence. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed it stated Resident #27 had a brief interview for mental status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. It stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing was completed as ordered, the physician was notified timely of the results after completed, and physician's orders were followed related to medication administration for one of five sampled residents (Resident #2). The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] from the hospital where she had been treated for C-difficile colitis (inflammation of the colon caused by bacteria) with diarrhea, weakness, decreased appetite and malnutrition. The resident had additional diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, hypothyroidism, dysphagia, rheumatoid arthritis, cerebral vascular accident, and bipolar disorder. Review of a nursing progress note on 04/15/24 at 4:12 P.M. revealed the nurse was notified by physical therapy about a change in the resident's condition. The resident was assessed. Resident alert to self and denied pain.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status including body weight. This affected one of three residents reviewed for meal assistance (Resident #2). The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] from the hospital where she had been treated for C-difficile colitis (inflammation of the colon caused by bacteria) with diarrhea, weakness, decreased appetite and malnutrition. The resident had additional diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, dysphagia, rheumatoid arthritis, cerebral vascular accident, and bipolar disorder. The resident was noted with a pressure ulcer on the right buttock on admission. The resident weighed 153.7 pounds on admission and had a physician's order dated 03/20/24 to weigh weekly for four weeks then monthly. Review of a nutritional assessment on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to report allegations of misappropriation to the state agency. This affected one resident (#86) of five residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 84. Findings Include: Review of the closed record for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 10/09/22 and discharge date [DATE]. Diagnoses included paraplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), intermittent explosive disorder, cocaine abuse, opioid abuse, cannabis abuse, and depression. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #86 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (no impairment). The assessment revealed Resident #86 had behaviors towards staff, was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel, used a wheelchair for self-propelling, nursing care for a diabetic skin impairment and required limited assist from staff for activities of daily living (ADL)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to investigate an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one resident (#86) of five residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 84. Findings Include: Review of the closed record for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 10/09/22 and discharge date [DATE]. Diagnoses included paraplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), intermittent explosive disorder, cocaine abuse, opioid abuse, cannabis abuse, and depression. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #86 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (no impairment). The assessment revealed Resident #86 had behaviors towards staff, was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel, used a wheelchair for self-propelling, nursing care for a diabetic skin impairment and required limited assist from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) including transfers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation, coordination and orientation for Resident #86 to ensure the resident had a safe and orderly transfer/discharge from the facility to an appropriate location that could meet his total care needs. This affected one resident (#86) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 84. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 10/09/22 and a discharge date [DATE]. Resident #86 had diagnoses including paraplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), intermittent explosive disorder, cocaine abuse, opioid abuse, cannabis abuse, and depression. Review of a care plan dated 10/10/22 revealed Resident #86 was at risk for skin breakdown related to fragile skin, incontinence, and venous ulcer to lower legs and feet. A care plan dated 10/10/22 revealed Resident #86 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-05 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure all resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) documents were accurate to resident current conditions and diagnoses. This affected ten residents (#59, #28, #68, #37, #14, #19, #56, #75, #42, and #55) of 13 residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were osteomyelitis of vertebra, type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute respiratory failure, dysphagia, muscle wasting and atrophy, hypokalemia, acute kidney failure, dementia, alcohol abuse, retention of urine, acidosis, bipolar disorder, altered mental status, hypotension, chronic kidney disease (stage III), cognitive communication deficit, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, insomnia, pressure ulcer left heel, hypertension, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder, atrial fibrillation, anemia, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-05 · tag F0646 — patternNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure all significant mental health changes were communicated to the state mental health agency. This affected ten residents (#59, #28, #68, #37, #14, #19, #56, #75, #42, and #55) of 13 residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) documents. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were osteomyelitis of vertebra, type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute respiratory failure, dysphagia, muscle wasting and atrophy, hypokalemia, acute kidney failure, dementia, alcohol abuse, retention of urine, acidosis, bipolar disorder, altered mental status, hypotension, chronic kidney disease (stage III), cognitive communication deficit, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, insomnia, pressure ulcer left heel, hypertension, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder, atrial fibrillation, anemia, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, financial record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide spend down notices to all residents who received Medicaid benefits. This affected three residents (#2, #3, and #19) of four resident financial records reviewed. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were chronic respiratory failure, type II diabetes, morbid obesity. unspecified focal traumatic brain injury, cognitive communication deficit, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, thrombocytopenia, dementia, congestive heart failure, tachycardia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/30/23, revealed Resident #2 had a significant cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #2's financial statements, dated 10/01/22 to 09/30/23, revealed his total was above $2000 for the entire time. The totals varied between $2,096.49 and $3,552.39. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident code status was accurate and consistent throughout medical records for two residents (#8 and #74). The deficient practice affected two residents (#8 and #74) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an initial admission date on 08/01/2014 and a readmission date on 03/02/21. Medical diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, emphysema, type II diabetes mellitus, cognitive communication deficit, heart failure, Alzheimer's Disease, and other specified peripheral vascular diseases. Resident #8's code status was listed as Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) on the resident's face sheet in the electronic medical record. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, financial record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify residents/representatives in a timely manner when there was a change in Medicaid benefits. This affected one resident (#3) of four residents reviewed for Medicaid benefits. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were hemiplegia and hemiparesis, type II diabetes, acute respiratory failure, aphasia, cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, metabolic encephalopathy, peripheral vascular disease, epilepsy, osteoporosis, hydronephrosis, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/15/23, revealed she had a significant cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's financial records revealed the facility received notification about her needing to send in documentation and verification for the need of Medicaid services, known as the redetermination. There was no documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to complete thorough neurological checks for Resident #8 after a fall. This affected one resident (#8) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 08/01/14 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), peripheral vascular disorder (PVD), age related nuclear cataract bilateral, age-related macular degeneration, congestive heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, and cardiac arrhythmias. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had severe cognitive impairment with hallucinations and delusions. Resident #8 required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, toileting, and personal hygiene and extensive assistance of two persons for transfers. Resident #8 had an unsteady balance and gait and was incontinent of bowel and bladder.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, financial record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an adequate plan to spend down resident finances when it was above the Medicaid allowable limit. This affected three residents (#2, #3, and #19) of four resident's financial records reviewed. Also, the facility failed to provide adequate social services to ensure residents didn't lose their Medicaid benefits. This affected one resident (#3) of four resident's financial records reviewed. The facility census was 84. Findings Include: 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were chronic respiratory failure, type II diabetes, morbid obesity. unspecified focal traumatic brain injury, cognitive communication deficit, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, thrombocytopenia, dementia, congestive heart failure, tachycardia, and anxiety disorder. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/30/23, revealed he had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to adequately address the pharmacy recommendations and have proper diagnosis for medications for Resident #28 and did not write contraindication for recommendations to decrease a medication for Resident #20. This affected two residents (#28 and #20) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 01/06/18 with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, congestive heart failure, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the current physician orders dated 11/23 revealed Resident #20 received clonazepam (antianxiety) 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily for major depressive disorder, buspirone hydrochloride (antianxiety) 7.5 mg by mouth two times per day for anxiety, aripiprazole 5 mg by mouth daily for insomnia related to schizoaffective disorder, and duloxetine hydrochloride…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain proper parameters for as needed pain medications. This affected one Residents (#11) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were type II diabetes, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, peripheral vascular disease, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, anemia, nicotine dependence, paraplegia, depression, polyneuropathy, cachexia, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease (stage IV). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/23/23, revealed Resident #11 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #11's medical records revealed her current physician orders included Percocet 10-325 milligrams (mg) every eight hours as needed for pain, Acetaminophen 325 mg every six hours as needed for mild pain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident medical records, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was maintained in a manner that met the resident's health and safety needs. This affected two residents (#8 and #235) of two residents who had orders for puree diets. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Observation on 11/27/23 from 11:25 A.M. to 11:35 A.M. revealed [NAME] #202 placed approximately five scoops of chicken and noodles in the blender to make it pureed texture. After blending for approximately 45 seconds, she obtained the proper texture. She started to pour the pureed texture chicken and noodles back into the pan that had regular textured chicken and noodles, which still had full pieces of chicken and noodles in the pan. As she lifted the blending pan to pour the pureed food back into the original pan, the surveyor stopped her so the two textured food items would not be mixed. Review of Resident #8 and Resident #235's medical records confirmed both were on a puree texture diet order. Interview with [NAME] #202 on 11/27/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records. This affected one resident (#37) of 27 residents medical records reviewed. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic bronchitis, dysphagia, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, nicotine dependence, hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia, hypocalcemia, dementia, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), age related physical debility, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, adult failure to thrive, hypokalemia, acute kidney failure, hypertension, pneumonia, hyperlipidemia, toxic encephalopathy, and hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/13/23, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #37 medical records revealed he had dental appointment records, dated 11/10/23, that were not actually his records. The dental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of the manufacturers guidelines, and facility policy review the facility failed to follow proper infection control procedures regarding cleaning a glucometer. This had the potential to affect two residents (#2 and #235) on the 300-memory care hall that received fingerstick blood sugars using the glucometer. The facility census was 84. Findings include: During the medication administration observation on 11/27/23 at 11:45 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)#164 obtained fingerstick blood sugar for Resident #235. After the procedure, LPN #164 cleaned the glucometer with a Micro-Kill bleach wipe by wiping it off and placing on the medication cart. LPN #164 stated she kept the glucometer wet for a few seconds (did not monitor the time). LPN #164 reviewed the instructions on the container of Micro-Kill bleach wipes that stated to kill viruses or bacteria keep the glucometer wet with the Micro-Kill bleach wipe for 30 seconds and let air dry. LPN #164 confirmed she did not keep the glucometer wet for 30 seconds. LPN #164 stated she did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide bathing as scheduled and per resident preference. This affected three residents (#5, #6, and #86) out of eight residents reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, type two diabetes mellitus, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers and one staff assistance with bathing. Review of the bathing documentation for Resident #5 revealed the resident was scheduled to be bathed on Wednesdays and Saturdays. There was no documented evidence of Resident #5 being bathed on 08/02/23, 08/19/23, 08/23/23, and 08/26/23. Interview on 08/30/23 at 10:58 A.M. Resident #5 revealed she was scheduled to be bathed twice a week but was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care for Resident #50. This affected one resident (#50) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #50 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, legal blindness, and polyneuropathy. Review of the care plan dated 05/26/23 revealed Resident #50 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interventions included to check for incontinence, clean and dry skin if wet or soiled, document when incontinent, and use pads/briefs to manage incontinence. The care plan dated 06/30/23 revealed Resident #50 had activities of daily living self-care performance deficit. Interventions included checking for incontinence every two hours and as needed, clean and dry skin if wet or soiled, and use pad/briefs to manage incontinence. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation related to 30-day discharge notices were contained in each resident's medical records. This affected two residents (#83 and #85) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 81. Findings include 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date of 05/31/23 and discharge date of 07/28/23. Diagnoses included fracture of lateral condyle of left tibia, diabetes and alcohol induced dementia. Review of a 30-day discharge notice revealed Resident #83 was given a 30-day discharge notice notice on 07/25/23 with a date to discharge on [DATE]. The notice was signed by Resident #83. There was no documentation in the resident's record reflecting she was given a notice to discharge or that the discharge notice had been rescinded. Interview on 08/02/23 at 10:58 A.M. with Regional Director of Operations (RDO) #101 revealed the staff on a corporate level did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility. This affected three residents (#83, #84, and #85) of three residents reviewed for discharge. Facility census was 81. Findings include 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and discharge date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included fracture of lateral condyle of left tibia, diabetes and alcohol induced dementia. Review of a progress notes dated [DATE] revealed the resident was observed drinking alcohol. The physician was updated on [DATE]. Review of skilled charting dated [DATE] revealed the resident required limited assistance and one personal physical assist with bed mobility and limited assist with toilet usage and used pads and briefs. The note revealed the resident was not receiving therapy services from physical, occupational or speech…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-06 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 01/02/20 with diagnoses including sepsis, depression, and dementia. Review of the nurse's note for Resident #63 dated 01/12/20 at 2:43 P.M. revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of sepsis, possible pneumonia, and hypotension. Review of the nurse's note dated Discharge Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 was expected to return to the facility from the hospital. Review of the bed hold notice provided to Resident #63 and his representative dated 01/12/20 revealed Resident #63 was private pay and there was no per diem bed hold rate included on the bed hold notice. Interview with the Regional Director on 02/05/20 at 2:46 P.M. verified the per diem bed hold rate was not included on Resident #63's bed hold notice dated 01/12/20. Review of facility, Bed Hold and Returns policy, dated March 2017, revealed prior to transfer and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to and included in care conference meetings. This affected one (Resident #50) of one resident reviewed for care conferences. The census was 75. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 03/24/17 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the care conference note dated 01/17/20 revealed a care conference was held on 01/17/20 and social services, nursing, and Resident #50's brother attended the care conference. The note did not include evidence Resident #50 was invited to or attended the care conference on 01/17/20 nor did it include any input from Resident #50. Interview with Interim Unit Manager (IUM) #168 on 02/05/20 at 4:31 P.M. revealed she attended the care conference and remembers Resident #50 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor for significant weight change in an appropriate manner. This affected two (Resident #2 and #24) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 75. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were dementia, acute kidney failure, polyosteoarthritis, history of falling, pain in left knee, urinary tract infection, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition (01/29/20), peripheral vascular disease, pain in right knee, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was five, which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. The assessment was completed on 01/24/20. Review of Resident #2 medical records revealed significant changes in her weights. The following are documented weights from the facility: 09/03/19 (184.2 pounds), 10/07/19 (175.6 pounds), 11/07/19 (175.4 pounds), 12/09/19 (175.3 pounds), 01/22/20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility contract review, the facility failed to complete on-going monitoring and assessments of residents who attend dialysis appointments. This affected one (Resident #24) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The census was 75. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were acute kidney failure, cognitive communication deficit, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, anemia, type II diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, vitamin D deficiency, abdominal pain, arthropathy, hypothyroidism, mitral valve insufficiency, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, personal history of transient ischemic attacks, and thrombocytopenia. Her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. The assessment was completed on 12/12/19. Review of Resident #24 medical records revealed she attends dialysis three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-06 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview, review of dietary spread sheet, the facility failed to provide diet textures as ordered by a physician. This affected one (Resident #63) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 01/02/20 with diagnoses including dysphagia, dementia, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the active physician orders for Resident #63 revealed an order dated 01/30/20 for a regular diet with mechanical soft, ground textures and regular consistency liquids. Observation of Resident #63's lunch tray on 02/05/20 at 12:49 P.M. revealed he received a pulled pork sandwich, mixed vegetables, and baked beans. The pulled pork sandwich was not ground and was partially eaten. Interview with Registered Dietitian #301 on 02/05/20 at 12:52 P.M. verified Resident #63 received a pulled pork sandwich, mixed vegetables, and baked beans and the pulled pork sandwich was partially eaten. The interview further revealed Resident #63 had not choked as a result of eating the pulled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements and honey thickened water were dated as to when they were opened. This had the potential to affect two (Resident #10 and #128) out of 17 Residents who have orders for Med Pass supplements and honey thickened liquids. The census was 75. Findings Include: 1. Observation of the 400 hall unit refrigerator on 02/05/20 at 12:03 P.M. revealed two opened containers of vanilla Med Pass supplements both undated as to when they were opened. Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/05/20 at 12:03 P.M. verified the two opened partially empty containers of vanilla Med Pass supplements were undated as to when they were opened. Interview with DON on 02/05/20 at 4:46 P.M. revealed there is a chance a nurse covering the 400 hall would administer the vanilla Med Pass supplement to residents with physician orders for Med Pass supplements on the 400 hall. The DON verified Residents #10 and #128 received Med Pass and/or honey thickened liquids. Review of the vanilla Med Pass supplement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$207,789 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $55,784 — penalty dated 2025-05-28
- $152,005 — penalty dated 2023-12-05
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GARDEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| FEUER, SAMUEL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/15/2022 |
| KUNAKA, KUDA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/15/2022 |
| WACHTEL, BRENDA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| OAKWOOD MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/15/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $674K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365572. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.