Maple Gardens Rehabilitiation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 67.6 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure supervision was provided during smoke break which resulted in resident to resident abuse. This affected one resident (Resident #30) of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 63. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 had an admission date of 08/31/21 with diagnoses of alcohol induced persisting dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Resident #3 did not exhibit physical or verbal behaviors. Review of the Smoking Safety Screen dated 05/05/26 revealed Resident #3 was safe to smoke with supervision. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #3 had behavior problem related to being verbally abusive to roommate and others and loud w/ staff at times. Interventions include education on successful coping and interaction strategies. Resident #3 had a care plan which documented the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate documentation. This affected one (#64) out of three residents reviewed for documentation. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 11/07/25 and a discharge date of 05/27/26. Diagnoses included acute pyelonephritis, Type Two Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, primary lateral sclerosis, hypertension, functional quadriplegia, chronic hepatitis, factitious disorder imposed on self, major depressive disorder, myoneural disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, personality disorder, other chronic pain, chronic kidney disease stage three, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia.Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/27/26, revealed this resident was cognitively intact. This resident was assessed to require setup assistance for eating, supervision for oral hygiene, and was dependent for toileting, bathing, dressing, personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, interview, review of training competency records, review of the manufacturers guidelines, facility record review, policy review, and review of current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidance, the facility failed to ensure glucometers were cleaned after use. This affected one (Resident #60) out of two residents observed for glucometer use. In addition, the facility failed to maintain documentation of annual fit testing for staff for a respirator required for respiratory protection when working with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive residents. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 64.Findings included:1. Review of the medical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #60 on 03/07/25. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #60's Care Plan Report, included a focus area initiated 03/11/25, that indicated the resident had diabetes mellitus. Interventions directed staff to monitor blood sugar levels. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of four medication carts were locked when not within the line of sight of facility staff. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 64.Findings Included:During an observation and concurrent interview on 02/25/26 at 6:01 A.M., at the nurse's station on the 300 Hall, a medication cart and a treatment cart, located between the Minimum Data Set (MDS) office and the nursing station, were observed unlocked. There were no staff members in the hallway where the carts were located. Three staff were observed in an adjacent hallway walking away from the carts. At 6:08 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #01 returned to the nursing station. LPN #01 stated the carts should have been locked when not in use. Medications in the medication cart included lisinopril (used to treat high blood pressure), Amlodipine (used to treat high blood pressure and coronary artery disease), and glipizide (used to treat type two diabetes).During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods were served per resident preference. This affected one (Resident #44) out of five residents reviewed for food preferences. The facility census was 64. Findings included:Review of the medical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #44 on 01/19/26. Diagnoses included hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), adult failure to thrive (FTT), atherosclerotic heart disease (AHD), ascites, and depression. Review of a Diagnosis Report indicated Resident #44 also had diagnoses that included protein calorie malnutrition (PCM), cirrhosis of the liver, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #44's Care Plan Report included a problem statement that indicated the resident had nutritional problems related to severe PCM, cirrhosis of the liver, DM2, hyperlipidemia, GERD, adult FTT, and AHD. Interventions directed staff to provide and serve diet as ordered and monitor/record intake for each meal. Review of an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, policy review and review of a facility emergency management plan, the facility failed to ensure there was an adequate amount of food available in the facility to account for scheduled meals and emergency situations. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 53. Findings include: Tour of the facility kitchen with Dietary Supervisor #10 on 01/15/25 at 9:19 A.M. revealed the emergency food supply consisted of six cans (24 servings per can) of tuna; six cans (12 servings per can) of ravioli; 48 individual serving cans of a variety of soups; 72 orange juice, four ounces (oz) each; 12 packs of lemonade powder, each pack makes three gallons of lemonade; four five pound bags of dry milk; a box of crackers; and 150 gallons of water. Interview on 01/15/25 at 9:32 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor #10 confirmed, during the facility tour, the kitchen has a shelf with emergency food available that contains the items observed. Interview on 01/15/25 at 12:42 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #32 confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), staff and legal guardian interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by ensuring a resident's legal guardian and physician were notified of an allegation of potential sexual abuse. This affected one (#12) out of the three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 53. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 06/30/21 with medical diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, Depression, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). The medical record revealed a discharge of date 11/11/24. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/21/24, which indicated Resident #12 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent for all activities of daily (ADL's) except required set-up with eating. The MDS revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record reviews, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of potential sexual abuse to the Ohio Department of Health in a timely manner. This affected one (12) out of the three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 53. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 06/30/21 with medical diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, Depression, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). The medical record revealed a discharge of date 11/11/24. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/21/24, which indicated Resident #12 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent for all activities of daily (ADL's) except required set-up with eating. The MDS revealed Resident #12 was non-ambulatory. Review of the medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff intervened when a concern was identified regarding potential resident to resident sexual abuse. The affected one (#12) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 53. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 06/30/21 with medical diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, Depression, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). The medical record revealed a discharge of date 11/11/24. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/21/24, which indicated Resident #12 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent for all activities of daily (ADL's) except required set-up with eating. The MDS revealed Resident #12 was non-ambulatory. Review of the medical record for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 manual, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was updated with current interventions. This affected one (#51) out of the three residents reviewed. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 01/20/17 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, congestive heart failure, schizoaffective disorder, and chronic ischemic heart disease. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #51 was cognitively intact and was independent with all ADL's except required supervision with bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed no documentation to support a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed for behavioral concerns with the interventions of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GARDEN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $569K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH