Eastwood Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's use of continuous oxygen was included in their care plan for 1 (#7) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The ADON identified eight residents at the facility who had orders for the use of oxygen. Findings: On 02/25/25 at 12:19 p.m., Resident #7's family member was observed informing staff that the resident's oxygen concentrator was turned off and the resident was required to have continuos oxygen. The concentrator was observed by this surveyor and found the power switch to be in the off position. On 02/26/25 at 9:36 a.m., an observation of Resident #7's oxygen concentrator found it was set to 3 liters per minute. A facility policy, titled Resident Care Plan, dated 03/27/17, read in part, The care plan will be developed with measurable goals to meet the Resident's identified medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. A Patient Care Order (Verbal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the correct amount of oxygen as ordered by a physician for 1 (#7) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The ADON identified eight residents at the facility who had orders for the use of oxygen. Findings: On 02/25/25 at 12:19 p.m., Resident #7's family member was observed stating the resident's oxygen concentrator was turned off. The oxygen was observed to be turned off and the cannula was observed to be in place on the resident's face. On 02/26/25 at 8:25 a.m., Resident #7's oxygen concentrator was observed to be providing the resident 3.5 liters of oxygen per minute. The resident's order was for 2 liters of oxygen per minute. On 02/26/25 at 9:36 a.m., Resident #7's oxygen concentrator was observed to be providing the resident 3 liters of oxygen per minute. On 02/26/25 at 11:14 a.m., Resident #7's oxygen concentrator was observed by the ADON and this surveyor. The concentrator was working and set to 3 liters per minute. The resident's order was for 2 liters of oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications ordered on an as needed basis were limited to a 14 day course for 2 (#7 and #31) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The ADON stated the facility had 11 residents who had PRN psychotropic medications. Findings: A Policy and Procedure for Drug Regiment Review, dated 04/10/17, read in part, The physician will document in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed and what, if any action has been taken to address it. If there is no change in the medication, the physician will document his/her rationale for the decision in the resident's medical record. 1. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included anxiety disorder. A physician's order, dated 12/18/24 at 11:15 a.m., showed Resident #7 was to be administered lorazepam (antianxiety medication) 0.5mg every 4 hours as needed. The order end date was documented as, Indefinite. A pharmacy consult report, dated 12/18/24, read in part, Please evaluate and verify the desire to use 14-day rule -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure the dish machine temperature and sanitizer concentration were monitored and logged daily; b. open containers of food were labeled with an opened on date; c. food was not stored on the floor; and d. food storage temperatures were documented. The ADON reported 36 residents received meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 02/25/25 at 8:20 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made: a. the Dish Machine Monthly Check Sheet, dated 02/25, had no documented temperatures or chemical concentrations since 02/19/25; b. open containers of 2% milk, cranberry juice, mayonnaise, and ketchup were observed in a refrigerator without documentation of the date they were opened; d. a large bag of blueberry muffin mix was observed on the floor in the storage room; and c. the Regular/Pureed Meal Temperature Log, dated 02/25 did not document the holding temperatures of meals served on 02/20/25, 02/21/25, 02/22/25, 02/23/25, or 02/24/25. On 02/26/25 at 11:52 a.m., the DM stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure catheter bags were not on the floor for 1 (#141) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for urinary catheters. The ADON reported one resident used a urinary catheter. Findings: On 02/26/25 at 3:44 p.m., CNA #1 and LPN #1 were observed providing catheter care for Resident #141. Upon entering the room, Resident 141's catheter bag was observed on the floor. During catheter care CNA #1 picked the catheter bag up off the floor, moved it over and set it back on the floor. After catheter care was completed LPN #1 was observed to hang the catheter bag off the floor. On 02/27/25 at 10:20 a.m., Resident #141's catheter bag was observed laying on the floor under the resident's bed. An undated facility document titled Catheter Care Policy, read in part, Avoid letting the drainage bag touch the floor. Resident #141 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus and urinary tract infection. A care plan, initiated on 02/24/25, showed Resident #141 had an indwelling urinary catheter. On 02/26/25 at 4:00 p.m., CNA #1 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an admission MDS assessment was completed within 14 days of admission for 1 (#141) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The ADON reported the facility census was 36. Findings: An undated facility document titled Policy and Procedure for Frequency of Completion of MDS, read in part, This facility will fulfill its obligation of assessing new residents no later than fourteen (14) days after the date of admission, and may be amended through the twenty-first (21st) day. Resident #141 had diagnoses which included pulmonary fibrosis and diabetes mellitus. Resident #141 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An MDS 3.0 assessment summary did not show an admission MDS assessment had been completed for Resident #141. On 02/26/25 at 8:36 a.m., the ADON stated they were in the process of completing a significant change assessment for Resident #141 and it was not completed in 14 days as required. They also stated they should have completed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission for 1 (#141) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The ADON reported that the facility census was 36. Findings: An undated facility document titled Policy and Procedure Regarding Resident Care Plan, read in part, Effective November 28,2017, the facility will establish and implement a baseline care plan that will be developed within 48 hours of admission. Resident #141 had diagnoses which included pulmonary fibrosis and diabetes mellitus. A review of Resident #141's medical record did show a baseline care plan had been completed. On 02/26/25 at 11:11 a.m., the ADON stated a baseline care plan could not be located for resident #141. They also stated baseline care plans should be completed within 48 hours of admission.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure base line care plans were completed for two (#88, and #89) of twelve sampled residents reviewed for base line care plans. A CMS-671, dated 12/15/23, documented 35 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy and procedure titled Resident Care Plan, revised date 03/27/17, read in part, .The facility will insure that upon admission, each resident will receive an initial care plan that identified the basic care needs such as toileting, bathing, nourishment, personal hygiene, fall prevention, wound prevention, and medical care . 1. Resident #88 had diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, and chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #88's medical record did not find a base line care plan. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. Resident #89 had diagnoses which included atrioventricular block,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to fully develop comprehensive care plans for two (#28 and #31) of fourteen residents reviewed for care plans. The DON reported the facility census was 35. Findings: The facility's Resident Care Plan policy, revised date 03/27/17, read in part, .The care plan will be developed with measurable goals to meet the Resident's identified medical, nursing, mental and psycho-social needs. It will include any services that are identified as needed to be provided and any services the Resident refuses or chooses not to receive . 1. Resident #28 had diagnoses which included dementia and hypertension. A significant change assessment, dated 8/7/23, documented Resident #28 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance from staff. A physician order, dated 08/07/23, documented the resident was admitted to hospice care. A review of the resident's comprehensive care plan did not document hospice care had been incorporated into the resident's comprehensive plan of care. On 12/18/23 at 10:00 a.m., the ADON stated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that a physician order was clarified and administered for one (#1) of one resident reviewed for following physician orders. The DON reported the census was 35. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses including neuromuscular disfunction of bladder and hypertension. An annual assessment, dated 11/14/23, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was always incontinent. A physician order, dated 12/10/23, documented Meropenem Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 1 GM (Meropenem) Use 1000 mg intravenously every 12 hours every 5 days . A treatment administration record for December 2023 documented Meropenem was administered at 9:00 p.m. on 12/10/23, this was the only dose documented to be administered or held on the MAR or TAR. On 12/18/23 at 12:06 p.m., the ADON displayed 3 doses of meropenem and stated they had ordered ten doses from the pharmacy so 7 doses had been administered to the resident. On 12/18/23 at 12:53 p.m., RN #1 stated they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$31,815 in federal fines across 7 penalties.

• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OKLAHOMA NURSING HOMES, LTD. — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK