Eastwood Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-07-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was a registered nurse (RN) on duty for eight consecutive hours each day. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 34 residents who currently resided in the facility.Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Policy Regarding Facility Staffing revealed, It shall be the policy of this facility to employ sufficient, adequately trained staff, to be on duty 24 hours a day, to meet the needs of the residents residing in the facility, as determined by the Administrator and/or Director of Nursing. A facility document titled, Time & Attendance - Detail Report. TA, for the timeframe 01/01/2026 - 07/22/2026, revealed no evidence of RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on 01/17/2026, 01/18/2026, 03/08/2026, 04/12/2026, 04/16/2026, 04/17/2026, 04/19/2026, 04/26/2026, and 06/28/2026. During an interview on 07/23/2026 at 12:12 PM, the Administrator stated there was no evidence of eight consecutive hours of RN coverage on 01/17/2026, 01/18/2026, 03/08/2026,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-07-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure followed the menu and provide a one-half cup portion of mashed potatoes during the lunch meal on 07/20/2026. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen.Findings included:An undated facility policy titled, Food Preparation, indicated, Policy: Portion-control methods will be used to assure the correct quantities are served to residents to meet the nutritional specifications as determined by the menu.An undated facility document titled Conversions/Measurements posted in the kitchen, indicated a #16 scoop would yield a one quarter cup, equivalent to two ounces.The facility's weekly menu revealed that on 07/20/2026, the facility would serve one half cup of mashed potatoes for the lunch meal.During the lunch meal tray line observation on 07/20/2026 at 12:58 PM, the Dietary Manager (DM) was observed to plate mashed potatoes with a blue handled scoop.During an interview on 07/20/2026 at 1:11 PM, the DM acknowledged she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored with a date and label and expired food items were discarded. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen.Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Sanitation and Infection Control, with a subject of Refrigerated Storage indicated, 7. All refrigerated foods should be covered properly, labeled and dated. and 10. The opened, unused portions of packaged foods should be dated to assure that they will be used first. An undated facility polity titled, Sanitation and Infection Control, with a subject of Usage and Storage of Leftovers indicated, 2. Leftover food must be covered, labeled dated and refrigerated immediately. 3. Leftover foods must be used within three days of the original cooking date. The policy specified, 5. Freeze leftovers that will not be eaten within three days, label, and date. and 7. Never mix leftover food with fresh food. During a concurrent interview and observation of the reach-in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-07-24 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every certified nurse aide (CNA) at least once every 12 months for 2 (CNA #7 and CNA #25) of 3 CNAs' personnel files reviewed.Findings included: CNA #7's personnel file revealed the CNA's hire date of 08/16/2022 and there was no evidence found to indicate an annual performance (skills) review had been completed. CNA #25's personnel file revealed the CNA's hire date of 05/08/2023 and there was no evidence found to indicate an annual performance (skills) review had been completed. During an interview on 07/24/2026 at 12:00 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated she had been the ADON since 2023. The ADON stated the CNAs were provided 12 hours of in-service training, but there was no documentation of the CNA's performance review. Per the ADON, she was not who was responsible for performance reviews, she thought it would be the Administrator, and then stated the responsibility for training and performance reviews would be a shared responsibility between her and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their infection prevention and control program to include conducting an outbreak investigation when multiple residents were diagnosed with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and failed to perform respirator fit testing according to their policy. These deficient practices affected 8 (Residents #1, #3, #11, #14, #22, #28, #40, and #41) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for infection control.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Respiratory Protection Program, dated 04/28/2021, indicated, d. Fit Testing Employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators will be fit tested: * Prior to being allowed to wear any tight-fitting respirator; * Annually; and * When there are changes in employee's physical condition that could affect respirator fit. A facility policy titled, Infection Outbreak Response and Investigation, with a copyright date of 2026, revealed, The facility promptly responds to outbreaks of infectious diseases within the facility to stop transmission of pathogens…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered an ongoing program of activities for 1 (Resident #21) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for activities.Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Policy & Procedure on Activities Program, revealed, This facility will provide for an ongoing program of activities designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Programs shall be designed to encourage rehabilitation and restoration to self care and normal activity. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #21 on 01/05/2026. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of depression and muscle weakness. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/20/2026, revealed Resident #21 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #21's Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's use of continuous oxygen was included in their care plan for 1 (#7) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The ADON identified eight residents at the facility who had orders for the use of oxygen. Findings: On 02/25/25 at 12:19 p.m., Resident #7's family member was observed informing staff that the resident's oxygen concentrator was turned off and the resident was required to have continuos oxygen. The concentrator was observed by this surveyor and found the power switch to be in the off position. On 02/26/25 at 9:36 a.m., an observation of Resident #7's oxygen concentrator found it was set to 3 liters per minute. A facility policy, titled Resident Care Plan, dated 03/27/17, read in part, The care plan will be developed with measurable goals to meet the Resident's identified medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. A Patient Care Order (Verbal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the correct amount of oxygen as ordered by a physician for 1 (#7) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The ADON identified eight residents at the facility who had orders for the use of oxygen. Findings: On 02/25/25 at 12:19 p.m., Resident #7's family member was observed stating the resident's oxygen concentrator was turned off. The oxygen was observed to be turned off and the cannula was observed to be in place on the resident's face. On 02/26/25 at 8:25 a.m., Resident #7's oxygen concentrator was observed to be providing the resident 3.5 liters of oxygen per minute. The resident's order was for 2 liters of oxygen per minute. On 02/26/25 at 9:36 a.m., Resident #7's oxygen concentrator was observed to be providing the resident 3 liters of oxygen per minute. On 02/26/25 at 11:14 a.m., Resident #7's oxygen concentrator was observed by the ADON and this surveyor. The concentrator was working and set to 3 liters per minute. The resident's order was for 2 liters of oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications ordered on an as needed basis were limited to a 14 day course for 2 (#7 and #31) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The ADON stated the facility had 11 residents who had PRN psychotropic medications. Findings: A Policy and Procedure for Drug Regiment Review, dated 04/10/17, read in part, The physician will document in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed and what, if any action has been taken to address it. If there is no change in the medication, the physician will document his/her rationale for the decision in the resident's medical record. 1. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included anxiety disorder. A physician's order, dated 12/18/24 at 11:15 a.m., showed Resident #7 was to be administered lorazepam (antianxiety medication) 0.5mg every 4 hours as needed. The order end date was documented as, Indefinite. A pharmacy consult report, dated 12/18/24, read in part, Please evaluate and verify the desire to use 14-day rule -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure the dish machine temperature and sanitizer concentration were monitored and logged daily; b. open containers of food were labeled with an opened on date; c. food was not stored on the floor; and d. food storage temperatures were documented. The ADON reported 36 residents received meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 02/25/25 at 8:20 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made: a. the Dish Machine Monthly Check Sheet, dated 02/25, had no documented temperatures or chemical concentrations since 02/19/25; b. open containers of 2% milk, cranberry juice, mayonnaise, and ketchup were observed in a refrigerator without documentation of the date they were opened; d. a large bag of blueberry muffin mix was observed on the floor in the storage room; and c. the Regular/Pureed Meal Temperature Log, dated 02/25 did not document the holding temperatures of meals served on 02/20/25, 02/21/25, 02/22/25, 02/23/25, or 02/24/25. On 02/26/25 at 11:52 a.m., the DM stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,635 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OKLAHOMA NURSING HOMES, LTD. — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK