Drumright Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 54.4 residents a day — about 41% occupied, or roughly 79 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.40 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.23 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.64 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 78% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 09/18/25, an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to protect residents from physical abuse.On 09/18/25 at 2:59 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation.On 09/18/25 at 3:06 p.m., the administrator was informed of the existence of an IJ for abuse and the IJ template was provided.On 09/19/25 at 10:39 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part, Plan of RemovalResident #28 has been referred for inpatient geri-psych services. Until such time that the resident departs the facility, the resident was immediately placed on one-on-one supervision.All staff will receive inservice training regarding abuse prevention including resident to resident abuse. Specifically, staff will receive training to intervene when resident to resident abuse occurs, report abuse immediately to the Administrator, to assess or evaluate the resident who sustained abuse for injury and document those findings in the resident record. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 06/25/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide supervision to prevent a resident with a cognitive deficit and a history of exit seeking behaviors from eloping from the facility. An order note, dated 03/08/25, showed Resident #1 tried to get out the front door. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 03/15/25, showed Resident #1's BIMS was 06 (severe cognitive impairment). A wander risk assessment, dated 04/12/25, showed Resident #1 was a high risk (score 15) for wandering. An incident note, dated 05/10/25 at 7:35 p.m., showed Resident #1 escaped the facility at approximately 7:00 p.m. Resident #1 made it one block down the road to Cimarron before worker realized they were gone. Staff assisted the resident into their car and drove the resident back to the facility. A care plan for the resident's elopement risk was not created until 05/12/25. A heath status note, dated 05/30/25, showed Resident #1 exhibited exit seeking behaviors. A combined…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to:a. prevent a fall during transportation for 1 (#2); andb. ensure interventions were initiated after a fall for 1 (#9) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents.The DON identified 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings:An INCIDENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE policy, revised 03/31/23, read in part, The charge nurse will complete an incident report including all information known about the incident as well as immediate corrective measures implemented.1. Resident #2's admission resident assessment, dated 08/14/25, showed the resident had diagnoses which included severe protein-calorie malnutrition and adult failure to thrive. The assessment showed the resident's cognition was intact with a BIMS of 14. The assessment showed the resident was dependent on staff assistance for on activities of daily living and transfers. A hospital After Visit Summary, dated 09/11/25, showed Resident #2 had diagnoses which included fall, injury of head, and laceration of right lower extremity.A combined Initial and Final State Reportable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · H2024-05-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and monitoring of a newly developed pressure ulcer for one (#51), and provide treatment and services to prevent worsening of a pressure ulcer for one (#49) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. This resulted in worsening of both resident's pressure ulcers. The DON identified six residents with pressure ulcers. Findings: A facility POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF PRESSURE ULCERS, revised 08/28/08, read in part, .Should a resident have an existing pressure ulcer or develop a pressure ulcer post admission, the facility will implement procedures to evaluate the ulcer regularly .The facility will evaluate the ulcer at least weekly, utilizing a flow sheet that notes the location of the ulcer, the stage, presence of eschar, size, color odor, drainage, tunneling/sinus tract/undermining if present .The facility will notify the physician upon the onset of the ulcer an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure PRN psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days for 2 (#9 and #28) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication.The DON identified 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Other drugs needing special handling and attention, read in part, Psychotropics drugs effective 11.28.17 PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days, unless the physician believes that it is appropriate for the PRN to be extended beyond 14 days. The physician will document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration of the PRN order. 1.Resident #9's physician's order, dated 07/25/25, showed lorazepam (antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg tablet. Give 0.5 mg by mouth every six hours as needed for anxiety related to dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, moderate, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Resident #9's order for lorazepam had no stop date. An August 2025 MAR showed lorazepam was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge assessment was transmitted for 1 (#24) of 12 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed.The DON identified 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings:Resident #24's discharge assessment return not anticipated, dated 05/31/25, showed the resident had a planned discharge on [DATE].There was no documentation the discharge resident assessment was transmitted.On 09/22/25 at 10:03 a.m., the ADON stated the registered nurse was responsible for transmitting the completed resident assessments.On 09/22/25 at 10:06 a.m., the IP stated they tried to transmit resident assessments within five days of completion.On 09/22/25 at 10:09 a.m., the IP stated Resident #24's discharge assessment dated [DATE] was not transmitted.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a nebulizer mask and tubing was stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination for 1 (#58) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care.The DON identified 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 09/15/25 at 12:42 p.m., a nebulizer mask was observed laying on Resident #58's nightstand.On 09/22/25 at 10:46 a.m., a nebulizer mask was observed laying on Resident #58's nightstand. The part of the tubing that connected to the machine was laying on the floor by the resident's bed.An undated facility policy titled POLICY AND PROCEDURE REGARDING CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE OF NEBULIZERS, OXYGEN SUPPLIES AND METERED DOSE INHALERS, read in part, when the equipment is not in use, it may be stored in a plastic container or covering.Resident #58's physician's order, dated 09/08/25, showed ipratropium-albuterol inhalation solution (a breathing treatment) 3mg/3ml, inhale one vial orally four times a day for wheezing.Resident #58's admission resident assessment, dated 09/12/25, showed the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was updated to reflect each time the resident eloped from the facility for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The infection control nurse identified six residents at risk for elopement resided in the facility. Findings: A resident care plan policy, revised 03/27/17, read in part, The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and updated by the IDT [interdisciplinary team] after each quarterly and annual assessment thereafter. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 03/15/25, showed Resident #1's BIMS was 06 (severe cognitive impairment). The assessment showed Resident #1 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and psychotic disorder. An incident note, dated 05/10/25 at 7:35 p.m., showed Resident #1 escaped the facility at approximately 7:00 p.m. The note showed the resident made it down to Cimarron one block down the road before a worker realized they were gone. The note showed CNA #3 brought the resident back in their car and took the resident back…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation after an allegation of abuse from staff for 2 (#1 and #2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Policy and procedure regarding prohibition for resident abuse including corporal punishment, neglect and exploitation, revised 10/2022, read in part, Interviewing by standers, witnesses et. as soon as possible .Staff will increase supervision .and all other residents that may be impacted . All staff are required to report .OSDH, law enforcement and/or adult protective services. 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, schizoaffective, and paranoid disorder. Resident #1's quarterly resident assessment, dated 02/24/25, showed a BIMS score of 15, indicating the resident's cognition was intact. An OSDH initial incident report form, dated 03/09/25, did not show adult protective services was notified of the allegation. An attachment to the initial incident report, dated 03/09/25, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-09 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
  Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the individual functioning as the social worker met the required qualifications for a facility with more than 120 beds. The administrator identified 54 resident resided in the facility. Findings: An Oklahoma State Department of Health Nursing Facility License, issued on 11/07/22, documented the facility was licensed for a maximum of 133 beds. On 05/08/24 at 10:00 a.m., the ADON and DON were asked if they had a qualified social worker on a full time basis. They stated they did have a full time social worker and they would check on their qualifications. On 05/08/24 at 12:06 a.m., the DON stated their social worker had an associate in arts and had six years of experience as a case manager at a prison. They stated they did not have a bachelors degree. They stated they were licensed for 133 beds, but they did not have that many beds.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PRN psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days for one (#3) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified five residents who had orders for PRN psychotropic medications. Findings: Res #3 had diagnoses which included anxiety and agitation. A physician order, dated 12/01/23, documented Ativan suspension (benzodiazepine medication) 1 mg/ml. Give 0.5 ml sublingually every fours hours as needed for 14 days. The February 2024 MAR document Ativan was administered on 02/26/24 and 02/28/24. The March 2024 MAR documented Ativan was administered on 03/03/24, 03/11/24, and 03/21/24. On 05/08/24 at 10:07 a.m., the ADON and DON were made aware of the resident's Ativan order. The ADON stated the order should have stopped and been reassessed. )

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature and palatable. The DM identified 52 residents received services from the kitchen. Two residents received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube. Findings: 1. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 02/20/24, documented Res #5's cognition was intact. On 05/06/24 at 7:45 a.m., the resident was asked how was the food. They stated some of the food was not good. They stated they ate in their room and sometimes the food was cold. 2. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 04/29/24, documented Res #7 was moderately impaired in cognition. On 05/06/24 at 9:27 a.m., the resident stated the food was not good. They stated the food was cold all the time and sometimes it was so salty it would cross your eyes. They stated the facility would provide a sandwich as an alternative. They stated the biscuit served for breakfast was so hard they could not eat it. 3. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 04/28/24, documented Res #14's cognition was intact. On 05/06/24 at 8:17 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner. The DM identified 52 residents received services from the kitchen. Two residents received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube. Findings: An undated Spectrum Advance Hand Sanitizer Gel safety data sheet, read in part, .Flammable liquid and vapor .Keep away from heat/sparks/open flames/hot surfaces .Keep product and empty container away from heat and sources of ignition .Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product . On 05/07/24 at 11:45 a.m., dietary aide #1 was observed preparing drinks for the lunch meal in the dining room. They entered the kitchen for a container of coffee, then returned to the dining room to prepare drinks. They did not wash their hands when entering the kitchen. Dietary aide #1 was observed entering the kitchen and preparing the coffee maker to make more coffee. They exited the kitchen and continued to prepare drinks for the meal. They did not wash their hands when entering the kitchen. Dietary aide #1 was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program to help prevent the transmission of infections for two (#2 and #51) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The DON identified six residents with pressure ulcers. Findings: An undated facility WOUND DRESSINGS policy, read in part, .Gather supplies: 3 or more pairs of Gloves; Wax paper; .Anything brought into the room must be cleaned or discarded .Place wax paper on a clean, dry surface next to where you will be working. Set up supplies on waxed paper . 1. Res #2 had diagnoses which included severe sepsis, need for assistance with personal care, pain, and personal history of other diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue. A physician order, dated 04/01/24, documented cleanse the area to the inner left foot with Betadine and cover with a protective dressing daily. On 05/08/24 at 9:40 a.m., LPN #2 was observed performing wound care for the resident. They gathered their supplies, placed them in a metal pan, and entered the resident's room.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$102,356 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $38,909 — penalty dated 2025-09-22
• $23,095 — penalty dated 2025-07-02
• $40,352 — penalty dated 2024-05-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OKLAHOMA NURSING HOMES, LTD. — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK