Miami Nursing Center, LLC
1100 East Street Northeast, Miami, OK 74354 · For profit - Individual · 82 certified beds · (918) 542-3335 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Dec 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $20,515 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-14)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.9% | 13.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.0% | 3.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.3% | 3.4% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.1% | 4.7% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.2% | 13.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.1% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.2% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.0% | 17.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.5% | 17.5% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.8% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.4% | 27.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.1% | 16.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.77 | 2.31 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.61 | 2.96 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.02 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.3%CMS range 29.9–62.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.9–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 43.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 4.1–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.83 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 63.6 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-15 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
On 09/08/25 an IJ situation was determined to exist related to involuntary seclusion for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for involuntary seclusion. Resident #1 was told they had to eat at a table in another room alone due to their behavior. On 09/09/25 at 2:15 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On 09/09/25 at 2:25 p.m., the facility administrator and the DON were notified of the IJ situation and provided a copy of the IJ template. On 09/09/25 at 5:30 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal read in part, At 2:57pm on 9/9/2025 the DON and Care plan coordinator met with resident #1. Advised resident #1 that beginning with evening meal on 9/9/2025 she would be offered 3 locations for her meals to be taken. She could choose between main dining room, smaller dining room, or her room to have meals. Resident # 1 was agreeable to this plan. It was never the facility's intention to make resident #1 feel isolated, the facility never informed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-08-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
On 08/12/25 an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to pain management during wound care for 1 (#27) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for pain.On 08/13/25 at 1:00 p.m., the OSDH was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On 08/13/25 at 1:39 p.m., the facility administrator and DON were notified of the IJ situation and provided a copy of the IJ template. On 08/13/25 at 5:20 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the OSDH. The plan of removal read in part, a pain assessment was completed on Resident #27 at 3:00 p.m., on 08/13/25. PCP [primary care physician] for Resident #27 was contacted and a new order for Tramadol, an analgesic, was obtained. Staff will offer PRN [as needed] pain medication approximately 30 minutes prior to wound care. Care plan for Resident #27 will be updated accordingly. For all other residents a new pain assessment will be completed by 12:00 p.m., tomorrow (08/14/25). All employees will be in-serviced on pain management including recognition of pain (verbal and non-verbal signs) by midnight 08/13/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident medication administration records and controlled drug count sheets accurately recorded the disposition of medications for 3 (#1, 7, and #8) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for medical record accuracy.The DON identified 19 residents at the facility were prescribed narcotics.Findings:An undated policy titled Procedure for Administration, read in part, Each dose of medication will be properly recorded in the resident's medication administration record . If the cma [sic] is unable to administer a resident medication for any reason, he/she is to notify the charge nurse immediately.1. A physician order for Res #1, dated 02/09/26, showed the resident was to be administered one Norco (opioid pain relief medication) 10-325 mg tablet every four hours as needed for pain.A MAR for Res #1, dated 02/2026, was compared to the resident's individual narcotic record, dated 01/24/26 to 02/26/26, for hydrocodone (pain medication) 10-235 mg tablets. The comparison showed the following discrepancies and missing medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free from abuse for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents whose clinical records were reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A quarterly assessment, dated 12/10/25, showed Resident #5 was moderately impaired in cognition with a BIMS score of 7, had diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and hoarding disorder; displayed verbal and physical behaviors directed toward others, and rejected care. A state reportable incident report, dated 12/10/25, showed CNA #1 accused CNA #3 (an employment agency employed CNA) of abusing Resident #5 by pinning the resident's arms behind their back and dragging the resident to a chair to sit. CNA #3 let go of the resident's arms, but grabbed the resident's wrist and squeezed. The incident report showed CNA #1 asked CNA #3 to leave. The incident report showed CNA #3 verbally antagonized Resident #5 by telling them to punch, hit, and beat the crap out of CNA #1 before CNA #3 left the room. The incident report showed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to minimize the risk of spreading infection for 1 (#6) of 1 sampled resident exposed to COVID-19. The DON identified six residents and seven facility staff members who contracted COVID-19 since 12/01/25. Findings:On 12/12/25 at 12:35 p.m., Resident #6 was observed in their room with their roommate, Resident #5. Resident #5 was in their bed and Resident #6 was standing beside their own bed. Neither resident was wearing a mask. There were no barriers between the two residents. There were no visible signs of isolation gowns, gloves, masks used within the room, such as biohazard bags of used gowns, gloves, and masks present. Resident #6's room did not have signage for isolation on or around the resident's door and no personal protective equipment (mask, gloves, gown, etc.) was stored near the entrance to their room. On 12/12/25 at 12:40 p.m., Resident #6 exited their room and walked with their walker down to the lobby area near the front office and nurses' station. Resident #6 did not have on an isolation mask.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to:ensure opened containers in the reach in refrigerator were properly labeled; andensure the top of the oven was free of grime and debris. The DON identified 65 residents received meals prepared in the kitchen.Findings:On 08/06/25 at 10:00 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made:a. an opened gallon container of orange drink, an opened 48-ounce container of grape juice, an opened 48-ounce container of prune juice, and an opened 46-ounce container of thickened lemon water were observed in the reach in refrigerator. None of the open containers were labeled with the date they were opened, andb. the top of the oven was covered with debris and the walls above the oven were coated with sticky brown substance.An undated facility policy titled Refrigerated Storage, read in part, The opened unused portions of packaged foods should be dated to ensure they are used first.An undated facility policy titled Cleaning schedules showed the oven and the walls should be cleaned weekly.On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a facility assessment included residents with wounds and the training and competency required to treat wounds.The DON identified four residents with wounds resided in the facility.Findings: A Facility-Wide Assessment, reviewed 07/30/25, did not address residents with wounds in the facility. The assessment did not address training and competency for staff regarding wounds. On 08/14/25 at 12:53 p.m., the administrator was asked why the facility assessment did not address wounds in the facility. They stated, That is something we will add to that. The administrator was asked why the facility assessment did not address wound training. They stated, We will take care of that immediately.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure training was provided for staff on wound care.The DON identified four residents had wounds in the facility.Findings: A Facility-Wide Assessment, reviewed 07/30/25, did not address training and competency regarding wound care for residents with wounds. Review of employee records did not show employees were trained and competent in wound care. On 08/14/25 at 12:55 p.m., the DON stated they did not know if they had a specific way to determine nurses were competent in identifying and treating wounds.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive was offered to 1 (#30) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for advance directives.The DON identified 69 residents resided in the facility.Findings: A quarterly assessment, dated 05/19/25, showed a BIMS of 15 which indicated Resident #30 was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The assessment showed diagnoses which included neurogenic bladder and quadriplegia. Review of the clinical record showed no advance directive acknowledgement to indicate Resident #30 had been offered an opportunity to develop an advanced directive. On 08/11/25 at 4:28 p.m., the DON was asked to provide an advance directive acknowledgement for Resident #30. On 08/12/25 at 7:52 a.m., the DON stated they did not find an advance directive acknowledgement for Resident #30. An advance directive acknowledgement was not provided for Resident #30 by the end of the survey.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to notify of a room change for 1 (#3) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for notification of change.The DON identified 69 residents resided in the facility.Findings: On 08/12/25 at 9:00 a.m., Resident #3 was observed to have been moved to another room. An undated facility document titled Policy and Procedure for Notification of Change, read in part, Except in a medical emergency or when a resident is incompetent, this facility will consult with the resident immediately and notify the resident's physician, and if known, the resident's legal representative or interested family member within 24 hours when there is .a change in room or roommate assignment (said notice shall include cost of transferring resident's telephone, if applicable). Review of clinical progress notes for Resident #3 showed no notification was made to a representative regarding a room change. A quarterly assessment, dated 07/07/25, showed a BIMS of 00, which indicated Resident #3 was severely impaired for daily decision making. The assessment showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure unnecessary psychotropic medications were not administered to 1 (#74) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The DON identified 57 residents received psychotropic medications in the facility.Findings: An admission record showed Resident #74 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included dementia, anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. A minimum data set assessment had not been completed and a BIMS was not established. A physician's order, dated 08/04/25, showed to administer Risperdal (an antipsychotic) 1 mg one tablet by mouth at bedtime related to dementia unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance. A physician's order, dated 08/06/25, showed to administer Risperdal 0.5 mg one tab by mouth at bedtime related to dementia unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety for 14 days. The order had an end date of 08/20/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurses were competent in identifying and assessing pain during wound care for 1 (#27) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for wound care.The DON identified four residents had wounds in the facility.Findings: On 08/12/25 at 1:14 p.m., during wound care, Resident #27 was observed to grimace, stiffen their body, and stated Ow, Ow!. LPN #1 was observed to not stop the wound care or address Resident #27's pain. Review of employee files did not show training was completed for wound care.On 08/12/25 at 3:20 p.m., LPN #1 stated they had not assessed Resident #27 for pain prior to wound care. They stated they did not know if Resident #27 had medication ordered for pain. LPN #1 stated they should have stopped the wound care when Resident #27 voiced they were in pain. They stated they did not know why they did not stop and it was wrong.On 08/14/25 at 12:55 p.m., the DON stated they did not know if they had a specific way to ensure the nurses were competent in identifying and treating wounds.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide catheter care as ordered for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for catheter care. The DON reported the census was 67. Findings: A physician's order, dated 01/30/25, showed staff were to cleanse the area around the suprapubic catheter and the catheter tubing with soap and warm water or normal saline every shift. An annual assessment, dated 02/19/25, showed Res #5 had a BIMS score (a test for cognition) of 15, which was indicative of being cognitively intact for daily decision making. The assessment also showed Res #5 had an indwelling urinary catheter. A treatment administration record, dated 05/2025, showed for the first 17 days of May out of 51 opportunities to provide catheter care it was completed 31 times. The record showed the resident refused 16 times and there was no documentation of catheter care on the evening shift on 05/06/25, the night shift on 05/07/25, or the day shift on 05/10/25. On 05/20/25 at 10:45 a.m., Res #5 stated CNAs never performed catheter care on them. They also stated only one nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of medical records for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for catheter care. The DON reported the census was 67. Findings: A physician's order, dated 01/30/25, showed staff were to cleanse the area around the suprapubic catheter and the catheter tubing with soap and warm water or normal saline every shift. An annual assessment, dated 02/19/25, showed Res #5 had a BIMS score (a test for cognition) of 15, which was indicative of being cognitively intact for daily decision making. The assessment also showed Res #5 had an indwelling urinary catheter. A Documentation Survey Report V2, dated 05/2025, showed CNA #1 documented they had performed catheter care on Res #5 on 05/05/25, 05/09/25, and 05/16/25. The report also showed CNA #6 had documented they had performed catheter care on Res #5 on 05/07/25, 05/08/25, 05/14/25, and 05/21/25. On 05/21/25 at 9:30 a.m., CNA #6 stated they did not go into Res #5's room. They also stated they did not perform catheter care on Res #5. CNA #6 stated they documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of a room change for 1 (#4) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for room changes. The DON reported the census was 67. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Policy and Procedure for Notification of Changes, read in part, The facility will also notify the resident, and if known, the resident's legal representative or interested family member within 48 hours when there is a change in room or roommate assignment. A resident list report, dated 10/16/24, showed Res #4 resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/15/25, showed Res #4 had a BIMS score (a test for cognitive function) of 0, which was indicative of severe impairment for daily decision making. A resident list report, dated 05/15/25, showed Res #4 resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A. A review of Res #4's medical record did not show Res #4 or their representative had been notified in writing of the room change. On 05/20/25 at 2:25 p.m., the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide imaging services as ordered for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for imaging services. The DON reported the census was 67. Findings: A physician's order, dated 12/29/24, showed Res #5 had a chest x-ray on 12/29/24. A nurse note, dated 12/29/24 at 7:33 p.m., showed Res #5 informed the nurse they were supposed to have a chest x-ray on 12/27/24 and they never got it. The note also showed the administrator was contacted and they confirmed Res #5 was supposed to have an x-ray on 12/27/24. An annual assessment, dated 02/19/25, showed Res #5 had a BIMS score (a test for cognition) of 15, which was indicative of being cognitively intact for daily decision making. The assessment also showed Res #5 had an indwelling urinary catheter. On 05/20/25 at 10:45 a.m., Res #5 stated they were supposed to have a chest x-ray on 12/27/24 and they did not get it until 12/29/24. On 05/20/25 at 1:50 p.m., the DON stated Res #5 should have had an x-ray on 12/27/24, but the nurse did not put in the order. The DON also stated Res #5 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was performed during catheter care for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for catheter care. The DON identified five residents with catheters in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Procedure for Indwelling Urinary Catheters, read in part, .Catheter care will be provided periodically throughout the day .Staff will assist the resident to [their] room, provide privacy and provide care consistent with techniques that prevent cross contamination . Resident #1 had diagnoses which included quadriplegia and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. On 10/17/24 at 10:32 a.m., catheter care was observed for Resident #1. CNA #1 was seen to don gloves, cleanse around the area of the catheter and without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene, then touched the resident's table and computer keyboard. LPN #1 was observed to don gloves, cleanse the area around the catheter with a 4x4, place the soiled 4x4 in the trash can, touch the side of the trash can with their gloved hand,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to: a. provide for the residents' dignity for three (#55, #4, and #50) of three residents observed for full visual privacy and for two (#50 and #26) of two residents observed with signage to always keep the residents' door open; and, b. provide enough dishware to allow for meals to be served without use of disposable containers and/or cutlery. The DON identified 73 residents in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #55 had diagnoses which included dysphagia. On 07/15/24 at 10:28 a.m., there was no privacy curtain observed to provide privacy for the middle bed of a three-bed bedroom. On 07/15/24 at 10:30 a.m., stated they had episodes of incontinence. The resident stated the staff closed the door but there was no curtain to provide full visual privacy from the two roommates. On 07/17/24 at 3:30 p.m., CNA #6 stated the staff pulled the door closed and pulled the curtains around bed A and bed C but did not have a curtain to pull for B bed to provide full visual privacy for the resident. - Resident #4 had diagnoses which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0571 — patternLimit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were not charged separately for services paid for by Medicare/Medicaid for one (Resident #174) of four residents who were charged room and board during covered periods of stay and for four (#8, #44, #55, and #174) of four residents charged for administrative supplies and whose monies were managed in the Resident Trust. The BOM identified 38 residents with funds in the Resident Trust. Findings: Resident #174 had diagnoses which included depression. On 07/19/24 at 10:30 a.m., the Trust Transaction History for Resident #174 was reviewed and compared to the facility's monthly billing statements from admission to 07/19/24 with BOM and Administrator #2. The transaction history and facility statements documented the following: February 2024 facility statement documented a charge of $2015.00 for Medicaid pending stay from 01/19/24 to 01/31/24 which left a balance due of $2015.00; Resident #174 trust transactions with posting dates of January thru February 2024: - 01/22/24 balance of $95.47 in trust account; -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure skin assessments were conducted for two (#42 and #3) and failed to ensure orders for intravenous care were obtained upon return from the hospital for one (#8) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for quality of care. The DON identified 73 residents who resided in the facility and one resident with intravenous access. Findings: The undated Procedure for Care of the Central Venous Catheter policy, read in parts, .Specific flush orders are obtained from the physician .DRESSING CHANGE Frequency .24 post insertion or on admission, at least weekly . 1. Resident #42 had diagnoses which included hypertension. The Order Recap Report, dated 07/03/24 through 07/31/24, read in part, .Skin assessment to be completed within 24 hours of admission and then at least every 7 days thereafter .Order Date 07/03/24 . The Admit/Readmit Screener, dated 07/03/24, documented the resident had right antecubital bruising. The Care Plan, dated 07/03/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide routine catheter care for one (Resident #2) of one resident whose records were reviewed for catheter care. The DON identified three residents with catheters in the facility. Findings: Resident #2 had diagnoses which included quadriplegia and neurogenic bladder. On 07/16/24 at 3:07 p.m., Resident #2 stated only one nurse consistently provided catheter care and when that nurse was off, they did not receive catheter care. On 07/19/24 at 3:08 p.m., CNA #7 stated they did not provide catheter care for Resident #2. They stated it was the nurse who provided catheter care. On 07/19/24 at 3:22 p.m., CNA #6 stated they did not provide catheter care for Resident #2. They stated it was the nurse who provided catheter care. On 07/19/24 at 3:30 p.m., LPN #1 stated catheter care was assigned to the certified nurse aides. On 07/22/24 at 11:28 a.m., LPN #5 stated catheter care was assigned to the nurse aides. On 07/22/24 at 3:35 p.m., LPN #3 stated they provided catheter care each shift they worked but had no place to document it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who received psychotropic medications were monitored for behaviors and side effects for three (#3, 44, and #28) of five residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 22 residents who received antipsychotic medications and 53 residents who received psychotropic medications. Findings: The undated, Monitoring of Extra Pyramidal Side Effects policy, read in parts, .Monitoring of EPS symptoms will be conducted through a universal procedure known as Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) testing .a minimum of quarterly . 1. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia. The Care Plan, dated 04/29/24, documented to monitor for anxiety, tearfulness, and agitation every shift. The Behavior Monthly Flow Sheet dated May 2024, documented behaviors were monitored 50 out of 93 opportunities. The specific behaviors to monitor for were not indicated on the flow sheet. The Behavior Monthly Flow Sheet dated June 2024, documented behaviors were monitored 32 out of 90 opportunities.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. medications were secured for one (North hall) of three medication/treatment carts observed; b. medications were dated when opened for three (North hall, North hall main, and the treatment cart); and c. medications were not expired for one of one medication rooms observed. The DON identified five medication/treatment carts in the facility. Findings: The Quality Control of the Glucometer policy, dated 03/22/12, read in part, .containers of test strips will be dated with the month, day and year when opened . The undated, Cleaning and Maintenance of Nebulizers, Oxygen Supplies and Metered Dose Inhalers policy, read in parts, .Staff will date the box of metered dose inhalers or the inhaler itself .when they are opened . The undated, Insulin Administration policy, read in part, .All insulin should be dated when opened . 1. On 07/16/24 at 4:09 p.m., a bottle of Miralax powder was observed on top of the North hall medication cart by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0570 — isolatedAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond in an amount to cover the facility trust. The business office manager identified 38 residents in the facility trust. The surety bond, dated 10/07/22, documented the bond to cover the balance of the trust was in the amount of $90,000.00. The April 2024 bank statement documented the daily balance on 04/03/24 was $91,136.92 and on 04/09/24 the daily balance was $91,773.92. The May 2024 bank statement documented the daily balance on 05/03/24 was $92,755.93 and on 05/10/24 the daily balance was $92,739.71. The June 2024 bank statement documented the daily balance on 06/03/24 was $97,106.92 and on 06/10/24 the daily balance was $95,842.14. On 07/19/24 at 9:38 a.m., the administrator stated they thought the trust was around $70,000.00 and did not realize the trust had such a high balance. The administrator stated they would have the bond raised to cover the higher balance.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a privacy curtain to allow for full visual privacy for two (#4 and #55) of two residents whose rooms were observed for a privacy curtains. The DON identified 73 residents resided in the facility. On 07/19/24 at 2:26 p.m., there was privacy curtain present for resident #4. On 07/19/24 at 2:30 p.m., the resident stated there had never been a curtain, and they would like to have one for visual privacy from their two roommates. On 07/19/24 at 2:44 p.m., CNA # 2 stated if resident #4 received incontinent care they pulled both curtains around the two roommates and shut the door. The CNA stated there was not a curtain to pull to provide full visual privacy for Resident #4. 2. Resident #55 had diagnoses which included dysphagia. On 07/15/24 at 10:30 a.m., Resident #55 stated they had episodes of incontinence. The resident stated the staff closed the door but there was no curtain to pull for the resident to have full visual privacy from the two roommates. On 07/17/24 at 3:30 p.m., CNA #6 stated to provide the resident with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised for one (#8) of 16 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 73 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #8 had diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation. The Admit/Readmit Screener, dated 07/09/24, documented the resident had returned from a hospital stay and had a midline placed in the left arm. The Care Plan updated 07/11/24, documented the resident had returned from the hospital with an order for an intravenous antibiotic. The care plan did not document the resident had intravenous access. On 07/16/24 at 1:20 p.m., Resident #8 was observed to have a PICC line to their left upper arm. On 07/22/24 at 2:15 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated care plans were updated quarterly, with a significant change, when new orders were received, and upon readmission from the hospital. They stated the care plan for Resident #8 had not been updated to reflect the PICC line. On 07/22/24 at 3:13 p.m., the DON stated they did not have a system in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent unnecessary weight loss for one (#33) of one resident reviewed for weight loss. The DON identified 73 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #33 had diagnoses which included dementia. An undated policy titled, Nutrition Policy read in part, .The resident will be assessed for weight gain or loss. Significant gain or loss will be reported to the resident's physician for possible diet adjustment. If the resident eats 50% or less of two consecutive meals, a nutritional supplement will be provided . A care plan dated 05/02/24 documented Resident #33 had a nutritional problem or the potential to have a nutritional problem, would maintain adequate nutritional status as evidenced by maintaining weight within 5% of current weight with no signs or symptoms of malnutrition, and would consume at least 50% of the three daily meals through the review date. On 05/02/24, the resident's electronic medical record documented the resident's weight was 132.2 lbs. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed after dialysis treatments for one (#64) of one resident reviewed for pre/post dialysis assessments. The DON reported four residents in the facility received dialysis treatments. Findings: Resident #64 had diagnoses which included end stage renal failure. A comprehensive assessment, dated 06/17/24, documented Resident 64 was cognitively intact. On 07/16/24 at 11:19 a.m., Resident #64 stated the nurse usually checked their blood pressure and temperature before they went to dialysis but when they returned from dialysis, they did not see the nurse unless the resident asked for something from them. The resident stated recently their port was infected and they had to take antibiotics. Resident #64 stated the laboratory test finding documented they had a blood infection. The resident's electronic medical record was reviewed for Resident #64. The electronic medical record did not document a post dialysis assessment to include vital signs, weight, or fistula/port assessment for the following dates:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of significant weight loss for one (#33) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for nutrition. Findings: On 05/02/24, the resident's electronic medical record documented the resident's weight was 132.2 lbs. On 07/03/24, the electronic medical record documented the resident's weight was 116.8 lbs, a significant weight loss of 11.65% weight loss in two months. 07/18/24 at 1:00 p.m., the Resident's electronic medical resident documented the resident ate less than 50% of one of more of their daily meals on 07/11/24, 07/12/24, 07/14/24, 07/16/24, 07/17/24, 07/18/24 On 07/18/24 at 2:32 p.m., LPN #5 stated if a resident eats less than 50% of a meal the CNA was to go to the kitchen and get a house shake to offer the resident. The LPN stated they were to document the supplement in with the activities of daily living. On 07/18/24 at 2:52 p.m. the Resident's electronic medical record did not document a house shake being offered in the last 30 days. On 07/19/24 at 10:39 a.m., CMA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to post the required staffing information. The DON identified 73 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 07/17/24, 07/18/24, 07/19/24, and 07/22/24 a staffing schedule was observed on the nurses station. The schedule did not document the census or the nursing hours. On 07/22/24 at 5:50 p.m., the administrator stated they posted a copy of the schedule but it did not have the nursing hours or the resident census on it.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders for one (#42) of seven sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 73 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #42 had diagnoses which included transient ischemic attack (mini stroke). The Discharge Summary from the hospital, dated 07/01/24, read in parts, .CONTINUE taking these medications .clopridogrel 75 MG tablet TAKE 1 TABLET BY MOUTH EVERY DAY . The Order Recap Report, dated 07/03/24 through 07/31/24, did not document Resident #42 had been started on clopridogrel upon admission to the facility. The admission assessment, dated 07/10/24, documented the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. On 07/15/24 at 9:51 a.m., Resident #42 stated they were supposed to take clopridogrel for a history of strokes but they had not received it while a resident at the facility. On 07/17/24 at 6:26 p.m., the DON stated admission orders for the facility were obtained from the hospital discharge orders.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen environment, maintain a sanitary dish machine, and store foods according to professional standards of practice. The DON identified 71 residents who ate meals prepared in the kitchen. An invoice, dated 06/12/24, documented the ice machine was cleaned and the water filter replaced by a contracted company. On 07/15/24 at 7:50 a.m., the following observations were made in the kitchen: - four flies buzzing about and landing on food preparation tables, cookware, and dishware. - two ceiling vents positioned over food preparation tables were covered with a layer grease, dust, and debris. - an open one gallon bottle of apple juice in the refrigerator with no open date; - an open 20 ounce bottle of Pepsi and a 20 ounce bottle of Coke in the refrigerator with no open dates or names; - an open storage bag with sliced luncheon meat in the refrigerator with no open date; - an open storage bag with four left over meat and cheese omelettes in the refrigerator with no prepared date; - an open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. Maintain an infection control program for enhanced barrier precautions by donning gowns prior to catheter care or wound care for two (#8 and #2) of two resident who received catheter care and/or wound care; and b. ensure catheter tubing and dignity bags were maintained in a manner to prevent cross contamination for one (#8) of two sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The DON identified three residents with indwelling urinary catheters. The undated Policy and Procedure for Transmission-Based Precautions, read in parts, .The expanded use of PPE and refer to the use of gown and gloves during the high-contact care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO) to or from staff hands or clothing or indirectly transferred from resident/client during high contact activities. Use Enhanced Barrier Precautions when providing care to any resident/client with an indwelling medical device such as an indwelling urinary catheter, central line, feeding tube,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physical environment was maintained in good repair. The Nursing Manager identified 73 residents resided in the facility. Findings: APolicy Regarding Triage of Maintance and Repairs undated, read in part, .It is the policy of this facility to maintain the physical plant in a safe and homelike environment .staff to maintain the facility in good repair, and clean and orderly environment . On 04/02/24 at 8:45 a.m., a yellow wet floor sign and a blue bucket were observed to be on the floor in the middle of the dining area near the serving window. The bucket contained approximately one half cup of water. On 04/02/24 at 9:03 a.m., Maintenance #1 stated he guessed the bucket was there so people won't slip and fall. They stated it looked like the water was coming from the ceiling. On 04/02/24 at 9:07 a.m., the CDM stated the roof leaks when it rains. On 04/02/24 at 10:21 a.m., the Maintenance Supervisor stated the roof had last been repaired in September 2023.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for one (#1) of five residents reviewed for care plans. The DON identified 73 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Policy and Procedure regarding Resident Care Plan, revised 03/27/17, read in part, .the facility will establish and implement .care plan that will .provide effective and person-centered care of the resident and meets current standards of practice for quality care . A Care Plan, dated 02/16/24, documented, Weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skin breakdown's width, length, depth, type of tissue and exudate and any other notable changes or observations. Resident #1 had diagnosis which included stage three pressure wounds. No documentation of wound care being provided was documented prior to to 03/17/24. On 04/03/24 at 8:53 a.m., LPN #2 stated the effectiveness of wound care was documented in the wound assessment. On 04/04/24 at 9:50 a.m., the DON stated they could not find any documented wound observations prior to 03/17/24. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. provide pressure ulcer care as ordered by the physician, b. complete weekly wound observations and measurements and, c. document refusals in the nursing notes. The Nursing Manager identified 73 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Policy and Procedure for the Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers, revised on 08/28/08, read in part, .For individuals who enter the facility with a pressure ulcer, or whose clinical condition demonstrates the development of a pressure ulcer was unavoidable post admission, the facility will strive to provide care and services necessary to promote healing, prevent infection and the development of new ulcers from developing .For individuals identified with risk factors, the facility will develop interventions necessary in an effort to prevent the development of pressure ulcers .The resident has a right to refuse treatment. This shall be documented in the resident's clinical record .The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was functioning in one of six occupied resident rooms reviewed for call light functionality. The administrator reported the census was 65. Findings: An undated facility policy, titled Policy and Procedure on Resident Call System, read in part, Resident calls from every bed, toilet and bathing facility, must register at the nurses station . On 11/20/23 at 8:40 a.m., Maintenance #1 pushed the call button in room [ROOM NUMBER] and the light did not activate. On 11/20/23 at 9:01 a.m., the maintenance supervisor stated they did not routinely test the call light system to ensure they were functioning properly. They also stated they were unsure a resident with diminished cognition would alert the staff if a call light was not functioning properly.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain safe water temperatures on the main hall for two (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) of nine rooms reviewed for safe water temperatures. The maintenance supervisor identified 27 residents who resided on the main hall. Findings: 1. Resident #18 had diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. Review of the water temperature logs, dated [DATE] through [DATE], did not reveal the water temperature had been monitored for room [ROOM NUMBER]. The Care Plan, updated [DATE], documented the resident was able to toilet themselves independently and required set up and staff assistance as needed for personal hygiene/oral care. The quarterly assessment, dated [DATE], documented the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and was independent with personal hygiene and toileting. On [DATE] at 4:24 p.m., Resident #18 exited the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] and LPN #3 washed their hands. LPN #3 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was clean and sanitary. The DON identified 60 residents who received ice from the kitchen. Findings: An invoice, dated 03/14/23, documented the ice machine was last provided planned maintenance on 03/09/23. The invoice read in part, .The technician arrived and performed planned maintenance. He disassembled ice machine, cleaned the ice machine with descaler, sanitized and replaced the water filter. The unit is functioning properly . On 06/20/23 at 10:15 a.m., the ice machine was observed to have pink, yellow, and brown gel-like substances in the top of the ice machine, where the ice was made. The maintenance supervisor was asked what the substance was. They wiped the area with their finger, collecting the substance onto their finger, and stated they did not know. They stated it looked like the service company needed to come out again and clean the machine. The maintenance supervisor was asked how often the ice machine was cleaned. They stated every two or three months. On 06/21/23 at 12:44 p.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were periodically reviewed for changes for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form identified 63 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. The resident's face sheet in the electronic clinical record documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] and was a full code. An Advance Directives/Medical Treatment Decisions Acknowledgement of Receipt form, dated 10/26/20, documented the resident/resident's guardian acknowledged they had been informed of the right to formulate an advanced directive. Review of the clinical record did not reveal any other acknowledgements of the right to formulate or change the resident's advanced directive. On 06/22/23 at 12:37 p.m., the MDS coordinator and DON was asked what was discussed during care plan meetings. The MDS coordinator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-22 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a notice of transfer to one (#25) of three resident reviewed for discharges. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form identified 63 residents who resided in the facility. An incident note, dated 04/14/23 at 9:07 p.m., documented the resident #25 had been transferred to a hospital following a fall. On 06/21/23 at 1:58 p.m., the administrator was asked if resident #25 or their family had been given a written notice of transfer for the resident's hospitalization which began on 04/14/23. The administrator replied no written notice was given but the family had been contacted over the telephone.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-22 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility had not provided a bed hold policy to one (#25) of three residents reviewed for discharges. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form identified 63 residents who resided in the facility. An incident note, dated 04/14/23 at 9:07 p.m., documented resident #25 had been transferred to a hospital following a fall. On 06/21/23 at 1:58 p.m., the administrator was asked if resident #25 or the family had been provided a copy of the bed hold policy on or after 04/14/23 when they were transferred to a hospital. The administrator replied the resident nor the family had be given the policy for that hospitalization.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$20,515 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $15,928 — penalty dated 2025-08-14
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to OKLAHOMA NURSING HOMES, LTD. — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SANDRA CHEEK FARMER TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | 8% | since 01/01/2025 |
| STEVEN R. TUBBS REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | 14% | since 01/01/2025 |
| CHEEK, BARNIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 02/08/2023 |
| ESTEP, PATSY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 01/01/2022 |
| HASKINS, LLOYD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 02/08/2023 |
| MCGREW, JUSTIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 6% | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375388. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.