Presbyterian Homes-Presby

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 113 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 64.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that assistance devices to prevent accidents or injury were in place as care planned for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2) who was at risk for falls, resulting in a fall with multiple fractures. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's fall management policy, dated January 30, 2025, indicated that the facility would provide each resident with appropriate assessment and interventions to prevent falls and to minimize complications if a fall occurred. The facility would ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. When a resident sustained a fall, the assessment process would include an investigation using the Fall Investigation analysis sheet. The fall investigation would be used to evaluate probable causal factors, which may include environmental factors, resident medication condition, resident behavioral manifestations, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies, investigative reports, and residents' clinical records, as well as staff and family interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect caused by a failure to follow the facility's policy for obtaining temperatures of hot liquids for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 1), resulting in the resident spilling her coffee and causing a burn. This deficiency was cited as past noncompliance. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding resident abuse, dated February 8, 2024, revealed that each resident is provided a safe environment where they are not subjected to mental, physical, verbal, and sexual abuse. Residents shall also be protected from mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. Neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees, or services providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. The facility's policy regarding reheating of hot food/beverages, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies, clinical records, and facility investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment that was free of accident hazards by serving hot coffee in a cup without a lid to one of two residents (Resident 1) without first obtaining a temperature to ensure that it was not greater than 140 degrees Fahrenheit, resulting in third degree burns when it was spilled on the resident. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding reheating of hot food/beverages, dated February 8, 2024, revealed that when serving hot beverages the maximum temperature should not be greater than 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F). An accurate temperature of all menu items, including hot beverages, are to be taken and recorded on the food temperature log. The facility's policy regarding food temperature logs, dated February 8, 2024, revealed that food temperatures of cold and hot items will be recorded on all menu items for meal service. All employees are responsible for notifying…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for five of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 7, 28, 55, 61). Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, revealed that Section N was to be coded for medications received in the last seven days. Section N0415C was to be coded if the resident received an antidepressant medication in the previous seven days, Section N0415F1 was to be coded if the resident received an antibiotic medication in the previous seven days, and Section N0415K1 was to be coded if the resident received an anticonvulsant medication in the previous seven days. Physician's orders for Resident 6, dated August 29, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 300 mg of Gabapentin (an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in two of two kitchenettes reviewed (first and second floor).Findings include: The facility policy regarding food storage, dated January 30, 2025, revealed that food should be stored in such a manner as to prevent contamination and to maintain the safety and wholesomeness of the food for human consumption. Observations in the kitchen's walk in dry storage room on September 29, 2025, at 9:37 a.m. revealed that there a bag of decorative sprinkles (approximately 10 pounds) that was open to the air, and one pound of [NAME] powder that expired on April 18, 2022. Observations in the second floor kitchenette's refrigerator/freezer on October 1, 2025, at 8:35 a.m. revealed a head of lettuce that was open to the air in the refrigerator, and two bags of frozen hot dogs (approximately 40) and a bag of six frozen hamburgers that were open…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper hand washing techniques were used during medication administration for six of nine residents observed (Residents 10, 15, 26 34, 53, 59). Findings include:The facility's policies regarding oral medication administration and hand hygiene, dated January 30, 2025, indicated that all employees were to follow the hand washing procedure, which included hand sanitizing, before preparing or handling medications, and after glove removal.Observations during the medication pass on the 200 hall on October 1, 2024, at 7:40 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 6 prepared Resident 53's medications and administered them. Without sanitizing his hands he prepared and administered Resident 26's medications, without sanitizing his hands LPN 6 donned gloves, prepared and administered Resident 59's medications, doffed his gloves and without sanitizing his hands he prepared and administered Resident 34's medications, without sanitizing his hands he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies, investigation reports, clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 55). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated January 31, 2025, revealed that each resident would be provided with a safe environment where they are not subject to mental, physical, verbal, and sexual abuse, and that residents would be protected from mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of property.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 55 dated July 13, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia.Resident 55's care plan, dated June 1, 2025, indicated that the resident had dementia, as well as anxiety and agitation.The facility's investigation documents for Resident 55, dated August 15, 2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative, in writing regarding the reason for transfer to the hospital and failed to notify the ombudsman of the transfer to the hospital, for three of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 8, 75), Findings include:The facility policy for Admission, Transfer and Discharge Notification, dated January 30, 2025, indicated that upon transfer to the hospital the resident and resident representative will be notified in writing, and the ombudsman will be notified.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated May 14, 2025, indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, usually understood and usually understands, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs and had diagnoses that included, cerebral infarct (stroke).Review of Resident 4's clinical record indicated that on July 4, 2025 at 1:23 p.m. the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that bowel protocols were followed as ordered by the physician for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 61).Findings include:A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 61, dated September 9, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and was frequently incontinent of bowel movements. Physician's orders for Resident 61, dated April 28, 2025, included orders for the resident to receive 30 milliliters of Milk of Magnesia as needed for no bowel movements for three days, give on day 4 of no bowel movement; a 10 milligram dulcolax suppository rectally as needed for no bowel movement for four days, give on day five of no bowel movement; and a Fleets enema to be given rectally as needed for no bowel movement for five days, give on day six of no bowel movement. Review of Resident 61's bowel records for August and September 2025 revealed that there was no documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of hospice contracts and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated interdisciplinary team member obtained the required information from the contracted hospice provider for one of five hospice residents reviewed (Resident 10). Findings include: An agreement between the facility and a hospice provider (provider of end-of-life services) indicated that the hospice provider would provide information to the facility to facilitate coordination of care that included a hospice benefit of elections form (a form signed to indicate that the individual waives all rights to traditional Medicare Part A payments for treatment related to the terminal illness). Physician's orders for Resident 10, dated April 25, 2025, revealed that the resident was to receive hospice services. As of September 30, 2025, there was no documented evidence in the resident's clinical record, or in the hospice provider's clinical record, that the facility obtained the hospice benefit of elections form from the hospice provider.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident representative was notified timely about a change in condition for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding changes in condition, dated January 30, 2025, indicated that the facility would provide timely notification to families, resident representatives, powers of attorney, physicians, and staff of changes in resident medical conditions consistent with regulation and resident choice.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated August 5, 2025, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, usually understood, could sometimes understand, required assistance with care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia.A grievance filed by the resident representative on July 24, 2025, revealed that Resident 2's glasses were missing. The glasses were replaced by 360 care. The investigation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for bowel protocols/medications were followed for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding bowel management, dated January 30, 2025, indicated that the facility would follow the facility-specific bowel protocol or physican orders. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 1, dated November 9, 2025, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, was continent of bowel, and had diagnoses that included kidney failure, anemia, and dementia. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated July 10, 2024, included orders for the resident to receive 30 mL of Milk of Magnesia as needed for constipation if no bowel movement on day four, a 10 mg Dulcolax suppository as needed if the resident did not have a bowel movement on day five day, and a Fleets enema on day six with no bowel movement if the Dulcolax suppository was not effective. Review of Resident 1's bowel records…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 4, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and had a history of falls. The care plan, dated December 22, 2024, through February 1, 2025, for Resident 3 revealed that the resident was non-compliant and at risk for falling and had the following interventions in place: provide environment free of clutter, keep call bell light in reach at all times, keep personal items and frequently used items within reach, kid cushion to the night stand, gripper socks on while in bed, reminder signs to ring for assistance, non-skid strips to the right side of the bed, bed height marked on the wall for bed height, anti-roll back devices to wheelchair, offer to lie down after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,759 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $15,935 — penalty dated 2025-02-05
• $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-07-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR LIVING — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 52 rows in the source record cover these 46 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

23 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA