No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Quincy Retirement Community

6596 Orphanage Road, Waynesboro, PA 17268 · Non profit - Corporation · 94 certified beds · (717) 302-7801 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (717) 302-7801 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6155 Anthony Hwy · (717) 749-3181 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
406 E Main St · (717) 762-1126 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6374 Nunnery Rd · (717) 762-4840 · Call to confirm hours
Park
7575 Mentzer Gap Rd · (717) 762-5679 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.2%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.1%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.1%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.4%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.7%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.3%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.7%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.6%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.6%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.541.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.601.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 263 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.81U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.38hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.33hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 111 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.81 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.9%CMS range 46.3–55.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.9–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge41.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.6–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.841.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
1.05
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.74
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
38.8%
Total nursing turnover
52.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 83.2 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-25)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2026-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, employee file review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility displayed past non-compliance in its failure to provide adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents, which resulted in harm as evidenced by a fall and fractured nose for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Falls Management Program, dated December 29, 2025, revealed, in part, The facility will ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible. [Facility] is committed to promoting resident autonomy by providing an environment that remains as free of accident hazards as possible. Each resident is assisted in attaining or maintaining their highest practicable level of function through providing each resident with adequate supervision and assistance devices and functional programs as appropriate to prevent accidents. Review of facility policy, titled Wheelchair Mobility Policy, dated December 30, 2025, revealed, in part, Residents who use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one of one residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 55).Findings Include: Review of Resident 55's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (acute brain dysfunction caused by systemic illness) and sequelae of cerebral infarction (physical, cognitive, and psychological disabilities resulting from brain tissue damage). Further review of Resident 55's clinical record revealed that on December 26, 2025, and January 1, 2026, Resident 55 was transferred out of the facility to the hospital and was subsequently admitted to the hospital. Review of the facility's Ombudsman transfer/discharge reporting documentation for the months of December 2025 and January 2026 revealed that Resident 55 was not on the list for either month. During an interview on February 25, 2026, at 12:09 PM, with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), it was confirmed that Resident 55 was not on the list for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to identify pressure ulcers and to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for one of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 59).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Wound Care, dated December 29, 2025, revealed, in part, Health Center Registered nurse will assess, document, and notify the physician of a new pressure injury no later than the end of the following shift from the time the wound is found. Consult the dietician for all residents at risk for or with skin breakdown or wounds. Nutritional goals should be established. In addition, the policy indicated black heels that are intact and without signs and symptoms of infection or fluctuation are treated with pressure redistribution. No dressing is necessary. Float heels. May apply protective barrier twice a day and as needed. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, review of select facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure alleged violations involving abuse were investigated thoroughly and reported in a timely manner for one resident reviewed for abuse allegation (Residents 1).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation last reviewed December 25, 2025, revealed Under the Elder Justice Act, an individual must report any reasonable suspicion of a crime against a resident or participant within 2 hours of the reasonable suspicion if the incident involves serious bodily injury and within 24 hours if the incident does not involve serious bodily injury. The facility policy added a section, titled Identification of Abuse, that stated:All bruises, skin tears and other found injuries are investigated for potential abuse.Event and Response Reports are reviewed by physician, Director of Nursing, MedicalDirector, and Administrator for further action.Review of the facility incident dated December 24, 2025, at 9:00 PM, stated NA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' medical records were complete and accurately documented for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included fracture of the left ulna (break of the bone in the forearm) and anxiety disorder (excessive and persistent worrying). Review of Resident 5's January TAR (Treatment Administration Record - form used to document physician orders as well as when and how treatments are administered to a resident) revealed the following order was not documented as being completed on the dates noted: splint - three times a day, ensure left arm splint on left arm at all times; not documented day shift January 28 and 29, 2025; evening shift January 25, 30, and 31, 2025; and night shift January 23, 24, and 31, 2025, and February 5, 2025. During an interview with Resident 5 on February 4, 2025 at 10:41 AM, it was revealed she wears the brace at all times since having her cast removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for three of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 13, and 64). Findings include: Review of Resident 1's November 2024 MAR (Medication Administration Record - form used to document physician orders as well as when and how medications are administered to a resident) revealed an ongoing order for Olanzapine (antipsychotic medication) twice daily, effective September 14, 2024. Review of Resident 1's December 26, 2024, quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental or psychosocial needs) revealed that this assessment was not coded to indicate that she had received antipsychotic medications since admission/entry, reentry, or the prior OBRA assessment (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act - set federal standards for nursing home care), whichever was more recent. Review of Resident 1's MDS assessment completion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included a history of urinary tract infections (UTI's) for one of 21 records reviewed (Resident 43). Findings include: A review of the clinical record for Resident 43 revealed diagnoses that included history of UTI's and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (a group of cognitive disorders that cause memory loss, confusion, and other symptoms observed with Alzheimer's disease but have different underlying causes). A review of the clinical record for Resident 43 revealed admission to the facility on September 13, 2024. Resident 43 was admitted with a diagnoses of UTI. Resident 43 was ordered Macrobid (antibiotic) 100 mg (milligram) for 10 days. The clinical record also revealed that Resident 43 had a UTI on February 9, 2024. Resident 43's Urologist (a doctor who specializes in the urinary tract system) ordered Nitrofurantoin MCR (antibiotic) 50 mg capsule by mouth daily as a preventive measure due to a history of UTI's. A review of Resident 43's care plan failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the resident care plan was not reviewed and revised to reflect the resident's current status for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 10). Findings include: Review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (impairment in the way the body regulates and uses sugar [glucose] as a fuel, resulting in too much sugar circulating in the bloodstream) and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (moderate loss of kidney function). Review of Resident 10's active care plan on February 4, 2024, at 1:00 PM, revealed that she was careplanned for having an indwelling catheter (device inserted into the bladder for drainage). Review of hospital notes dated October 26, 2024, revealed that Resident 10's foley catheter was removed on that date. Observation of Resident 10 on February 4, 2025, at 9:37 AM, failed to reveal the presence of a catheter. Review of Resident 10's February 2025 MAR and TAR (Medication and Treatment Records) failed to reveal any orders for an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for five of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 19, 49, 56, and 76). Findings include: Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (CKD - longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure) and diabetes mellitus type II (disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high, but does not require the use of insulin). Further review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed their admission progress note dated January 2, 2024, which indicated the presence of an unstageable deep tissue injury. Review of Resident 8's Comprehensive MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental or psychosocial needs) with the assessment reference date (last day of the assessment period) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for three of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 19, and 56). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Planning, with a last review date of December 7, 2023, revealed, in part: Presbyterian Senior Living will comprehensively evaluate and re-evaluate a resident's need for service and develop a plan to promote their highest practicable level of functioning as set forth by our Mission Statement as well as State and Federal guidelines . 10. The care plan will be updated electronically as needed; and 11. The care plan will be reviewed and evaluated for intervention effectiveness no less than quarterly. Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (CKD - longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure) and diabetes mellitus type II (disease that occurs when your blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Wound Care, with a last approved date of December 12, 2023, revealed, in part: Care of wounds is provided in accordance with current research and practice guidelines in order to facilitate healing and/or provide comfort and symptom control as appropriate. Review of Resident 19's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), ischemic cardiomyopathy (the decreased ability of the heart to pump blood properly due to heart damage caused by blockages of blood vessels supplying the area), and polyneuropathy (the simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body). Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, facility policy review, and review of facility legionella guidelines, it was determined the facility failed to implement a Water Management Program for the prevention, detection, and control of water-borne contaminants, such as Legionella (a bacteria that may cause Legionnaires' Disease (a serious type of pneumonia)); and failed to maintain accurate infection control data. Findings include: A review of the facility policy, titled Anticipated Increase in Legionellosis Cases Due to Seasonality, dated June 12, 2023, failed to address any baseline or annual testing in the facility for water-borne contaminants, such as Legionella. A review of the facility policy, titled Surveillance for Health-Care Associated Infections (HAI), last reviewed February 22, 2024, stated, The purpose of the surveillance of infections is to identify both individual cases and trends in the transmission of epidemiologically significant organisms and Healthcare-Associated Infections, to permit interventions to try…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician's discharge summary included all required documentation for two of three residents reviewed for discharge (Residents 83 and 85). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Physician Services, with a last approved date of [DATE], revealed 13. The physician, CRNP [Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner], or PA [Physician Assistant] must complete a Discharge Summary that includes a recapitulation of the resident stay and pertinent instructions for continuity of care upon discharge. Review of Resident 83's clinical record on [DATE], at approximately 10:00 AM, revealed Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (progressive and irreversible neurological disease that causes decreased control of the nervous system resulting in stiffness, slowing of movement, and uncontrolled bodily movements) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services for urinary catheters consistent with the resident's comprehensive plan of care for one of six residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident 63). Findings include: Review of Resident 63's clinical record on March 4, 2024, at approximately 1:00 PM, revealed diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (CKD - decreased ability of the kidneys to filter toxin from the blood and produce urine) and osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) with sepsis (life threatening condition that results in dysfunction of the immune system entering the blood stream and causing inflammation in organs through out the body). Review of Resident 63's clinical record revealed Resident 63 utilized a urostomy (surgical opening to the bladder through the skin) with a catheter for urine elimination. Review of Resident 63's comprehensive plan of care revealed that Resident 63 had a care plan with the identified problem of, [Resident 63] has an ostomy to divert urine [related to]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for one of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 61). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Management of Behavioral or Psychological Symptoms of Dementia-BPSD with or without Antipsychotic, with a last approved date of December 22, 2023, revealed the following, in part: The FDA [Food and Drug Administration] Black Box Warning Regarding Atypical & Conventional Antipsychotic in Dementia states, 'Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with atypical antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death compared to placebo; Residents/families/representatives should be involved in discussions about potential approaches to address behaviors and about the potential risks and benefits of a psychopharmacological medication (e.g., FDA black box warnings), the proposed course of treatment, expected duration of use of the medication, use of individualized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR LIVING — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PHIOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2010
QUINCY RETIREMENT COMMUNITYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2010
BIRDSALL, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
CHOTTINER, LAWRENCEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
DAVIS, DANNYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2025
DENISON, BARBARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
DERR, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
ELLIOTT, BRENDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
GOLDSTEIN, TERRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
KINARD, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
REIMANN, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
RHODES, CHERYLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
SEIBERT, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
SHROPSHIRE, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
STONE, ROBYNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
DAVIS, TODDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
FOX, CYNTHIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2025
HERSHEY, KATHERINEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2025
HOFFMAN, CYNTHIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/02/2021
KRIEGER, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2023
MCALISTER, DYANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2022
WICKLINE, BEVERLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2024
BENCHMARK THERAPIES, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
CURANA HEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
BOWSER, NICOLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2011
COY, HEATHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2018
KATZ, PAULIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MURPHY, JODIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/24/2022
AB STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
ADARA HEALTHCARE STAFFING, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
AMERGIS HEALTHCARE STAFFING, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
BAKER TILLY ADVISORY GROUP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
CROSS COUNTRY STAFFING, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
DEDICATED NURSING ASSOCIATES, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FAVORITE HEALTHCARE STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
GHR HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
HEALTHDIRECT INSTITUTIONAL PHARMACY SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
READY TO HELP STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
RKL LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SHIFTSTER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
TITAN NURSE STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
TRIAGE STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 49 rows in the source record cover these 43 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.4M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 12%Other / private 23%

This home reported $4.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$810per resident / day
operating cost
$24,609per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$753per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395378. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next