No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Julia Pound Care Center

1155 Indian Springs Road, Indiana, PA 15701 · Non profit - Corporation · 96 certified beds · (724) 464-1600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (724) 464-1600 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 20241 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Linda0.2 mi
625 Rustic Lodge Rd · (724) 463-3720 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
655 Kolter Dr · (724) 349-1111 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.7 mi
2910 Oakland Ave · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2125 Oakland Ave · (724) 465-2665 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
905 McKnight Rd · (724) 463-3280

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.7%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.6%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened32.5%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.2%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.5%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.9%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.7%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.5%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.6%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.0%9.5%12.0%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 146 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 59.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.6%CMS range 51.2–65.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.6%CMS range 9.4–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting80.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.9–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.64
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
37.5%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 82.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-25)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, investigation reports, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1) resulting in a fall with fractures. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: A facility policy related to fall management, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that each resident is provided with appropriate assessment and interventions to prevent falls and to minimize complications if a fall occurs. The facility will ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible. Resident falls are analyzed and trended through the Performance Review process to maintain a safe environment. A facility policy related to reclining lift chairs, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that residents are evaluated to ensure they are capable to safely utilize a reclining lift chair. When a resident/family voices an interest in utilizing a reclining lift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care for pressure ulcers in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that recommendations from a wound consultant were reviewed with the attending physician and treatments for pressure ulcers were provided as ordered by the physician for four of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 2, 45, 46, 58) who had pressure ulcers. Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated May 18, 2026, revealed that the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required assistance from staff, had diagnoses that included dementia and other psychotic disorder, had a stage three pressure ulcer (tissue damage that results in full-thickness loss of skin and the layer of fat under the skin may be visible), and received hospice services. A wound consultant note for Resident 2, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was served under sanitary conditions, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding general sanitization of the kitchen, dated June 10, 2026, indicated that the food and nutrition services staff will maintain the sanitation of then kitchen through compliance with a written, comprehensive cleaning schedule. Cleaning and sanitation tasks for the kitchen will be outlined in a written cleaning schedule. The prep table shelves are scheduled to be cleaned 3 times a week.Observations in the main kitchen on June 25, 2026, at 9:20 a.m. revealed that the shelves under the food preparation tables where clean pots and baking trays were kept had dust, debris and a thick removable substance on them. The baking trays had and pink, removable substance around the edges.Interview with the Production Manager Assistant on June 25, 2026, at 9:25 a.m. confirmed that the shelves under the food preparation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide dependent residents the necessary services to maintain nutritional status for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 45).Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) assessment for Resident 45, dated April 9, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required minimal assistance for daily care needs and diagnoses that included hemiplegia (a form of paralysis that causes the severe or complete loss of motor function) and unstageable pressure ulcer coccyx. The resident's care plan, most recently reviewed June 7, 2026, indicated that she required extensive assistance with meals and snacks. Observations June 23, 2026, at 10:45 a.m. revealed that Resident 45 was being fed by her daughter. Resident 45's daughter revealed that when she entered the room at 10:30 a.m. breakfast was on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for two of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 3 and 4). Findings include: A policy dated January 22, 2026, indicated that glucose meter checks are obtained per physician order or as needed if resident is displaying signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated May 11, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs and had medical diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus. A nursing note for Resident 3, dated May 28, 2026, at 11:01 p.m. revealed that the resident's blood glucose was 453 mg/dl. Physician's orders for Resident 3 dated April 26, 2026, included orders to monitor blood glucose two times a day and call physician if blood glucose levels were less than 70 mg/dl or greater than 450 mg/dl. A nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 3).Findings include: A policy dated January 22, 2026, indicated that glucose meter checks are obtained per physician order or as needed if resident is displaying signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated May 11, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs and had medical diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus. Physician's orders for Resident 3 dated March 31, 2026, included orders for the resident to receive 10 units of Novolog (fast-acting insulin) with meals and to hold if she does not eat. A review of Resident 3's clinical record on eating April through June 2026 revealed that on April 5 she ate 26-50% of lunch; April 16 she ate 26-50%…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored in a secure manner and failed to provide a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment in the refrigerator for medication storage.Findings include: The facility's policy regarding storage of medication, dated June 10, 2026, medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely and properly. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel and staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Observations on June 24, 2026, at 9:10 a.m. revealed that the medication cart for the Highlands unit was in the hall, unattended and unlocked. Licensed Practical Nurse 3 was observed walking out of a resident room. The medication cart was not in sight of the resident room. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 3 at that time confirmed that she left the medication cart unattended and not in sight to administer medications and that she should have locked the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory services were obtained as ordered by the physician for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 43).Findings include: Facility policy for Laboratory Services dated January 22, 2026, indicated that the facility will provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of the residents, and will promote practices to ensure the quality and timeliness of laboratory services. The day shift unit nurse will fill out and send laboratory requests for newly ordered laboratory tests. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 43, dated May 20, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care needs and had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus. A Certified Nurse Practitioner note for Resident 43 dated May 15, 2026, at 1:00 a.m. revealed that the resident complained of urinary discomfort, and orders were received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received pneumococcal immunizations for one of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 46).Findings include: The facility's pneumococcal vaccine policy, dated January 22, 2026, indicated that each resident is offered a pneumococcal immunization, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated, or the resident has already been immunized. The resident or the resident's legal representative have the right to accept or refuse immunization. The resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates the following: a) The resident or the resident's legal representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of pneumococcal immunization on the Vaccine Informed Consent and Screening Form. b) That the resident either received the pneumococcal immunization or did not receive the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff wore appropriate hair coverings. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding personal hygiene, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that food is prepared, stored and distributed in a safe and sanitary manner preventing the spread of food borne illness. Observations in the 100-200 hall kitchenette during service for the lunch meal on June 2, 2025, at 11:48 a.m. revealed that Dietary Aide 3 was plating baked beans and hot dogs. Dietary Aide 3 had approximately three-inch tendrils of hair on each side of her head, and approximately two inches of loose hair on the nape of her neck that was not covered by her hairnet. Observations in the 100-200 hall kitchenette during service for the lunch meal on June 3, 2025, at 12:10 p.m. revealed that Dietary Aide 3 was plating hamburgers on a bun, and at the same time, she was standing over dishes of uncovered vanilla pudding. Dietary Aide 3 had approximately two inches of hair on each side of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments for four of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 12, 18, 72, 81). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of residents' abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that Section B was to be completed for each resident to document the resident's ability to understand and communicate with others. Section B0700 was to be coded zero (0) if the resident was understood by others, one (1) for usually understood, two (2) for sometimes understood, and three (3) for rarely/never understood. Section C was to be completed for each resident to identify his/her cognitive status. Section C0100 was to be coded No (0) or Yes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 27, 60). Findings include: A facility policy regarding care plans, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that the facility will comprehensively evaluate and re-evaluate a resident's need for service and develop a plan to promote their highest practicable level of functioning. The care plan will be reviewed and evaluated for intervention effectiveness and updated electronically as needed. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 27, dated May 20, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with care needs, had limited range of motion (the full movement potential of a joint) to her lower extremities on both sides, and had diagnoses that included muscular dystrophy (disease that causes progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for two of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 42, 72). Findings include: A facility policy for medication administration, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that the individual who administers the medication records the administration on the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) directly after the medication is given. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 42, dated May 15, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with care needs, and was taking an opioid medication (medications with the potential to be abused used to treat pain). Physician's orders for Resident 42, dated October 23, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive two 50 milligrams (mg) tablets of Tramadol (a narcotic pain medication) to equal 100 mg every eight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly date medications after they were opened in two of three medication carts reviewed (Highlands 1 and Highlands 2), and failed to discard expired medical supplies in one of two medication rooms reviewed (Highlands). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication storage, dated [DATE], revealed that the facility would store medications and biologicals safely, securely and properly. In addition, when the original seal of the manufacturer's container is initially broken, a date opened and expired date sticker shall be placed on the container. Observations in Highlands medication cart 2 on [DATE], at 9:36 a.m. revealed that there were two containers of 1 percent diclofenac sodium (pain reliever) topical gel, one container of 0.1 percent triamcinolone (steroid used to decrease inflammation) cream, and two containers of 12 percent ammonium lactate (treats dry itchy skin)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending July 11, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending June 5, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related accuracy of assessments, care plan timing and revision, pharmacy services, and food safety. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding accuracy of assessments, cited during the survey ending July 11, 2024, revealed that accuracy of assessments would be monitored by QAPI. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 67). Findings include: Current CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed, resulting in significant medication errors for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 14, 2024, revealed that the resident was sometimes understood, could sometimes understand others, and had diagnosis which included diabetes and dementia. Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated November 1, 2024, included for the resident to have her blood glucose (amount of sugar in the blood) level checked before meals and at bedtime, receive 25 units of Lantus Solostar (long-acting insulin used to treat high blood sugar) twice a day, and 6 units of insulin lispro (fast acting insulin used to treat high blood sugar) three times a day. Physician's orders, dated November 1, 2024, also included for the resident to receive 2 units of insulin lispro if her blood sugar was between 150 milligrams…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 14, 2024, revealed that the resident was sometimes understood, could sometimes understand others, and had diagnoses that included diabetes and dementia. Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated November 1, 2024, included that the resident receive 5 milligrams (mg) of olanzapine (used to treat the symptoms of schizophrenia) at bedtime. Review of Resident 3's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated November 2024, revealed that there was no documented evidence that the resident received this medication on November 11, 2024, or on November 29, 2024. Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated November 1, 2024, included that the resident receive two 325 mg tablets of Tylenol at bedtime. Review of the resident's MAR, dated November 2024 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 14, 2024, revealed that the resident was sometimes understood, could sometimes understand others, and had a diagnosis which included diabetes and dementia. Review of nurse aide documentation, dated December 3, 2024, revealed that the resident ate 100 percent of her lunch meal. Review of a grievance investigation related to Resident 3, dated December 3, 2024, revealed that Resident 3's lunch tray was removed from her room at 3:45 p.m. by the Director of Nursing, and the resident did not eat anything on that tray. Interview with the Director of Nursing on December 16, 2024, at 4:20 p.m. confirmed that nurse aide documentation of the resident's lunch meal on December 3, 2024, was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 67, 80). Findings include: A facility policy for medication administration, dated January 11, 2023, indicated that the individual that administers the medication dose records the administration on the resident's MAR directly after the medication is given. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 67, dated May 11, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for her daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included urinary tract infection and paraplegia (paralysis that occurs in the lower half of the body). Physician's orders for Resident 67, dated November 22, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 5 milligrams (mg)/325 mg of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (a narcotic pain medication) every eight hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nutritional drinks in the medication room and pantry were not expired (Crossroads). Findings include: The facility policy regarding food storage, dated March 13, 2024, revealed that food is stored under safe and sanitary conditions to prevent injury and food-borne illness. Observations in the Crossroads medication room on July 10, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. revealed that there were nine Nepro nutritional milkshakes (a protein drink generally used for dialysis residents) that expired in June 2024. Observations in the Crossroads pantry refrigerator on July 10, 2024, at 8:51 a.m. revealed that there were nine Nepro nutritional milkshakes that expired in May 2024. Interview with the Dietary Manager on July 10, 2024, at 8:58 a.m. confirmed that 18 expired Nepro nutritional milkshakes were in circulation on the Crossroads unit and should have been previously discarded. 28 Pa code 211.6(f) Dietary Services.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 60). Findings include: A significant Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 60, dated June 14, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was clearly understood and able to understand others, required assistance with care needs, had an indwelling catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine from the bladder), had a urinary tract infection (infection involving any part of the urinary system including the kidney, ureters, bladder and urethra) in the last 30 days, and had a diagnosis that included neurogenic bladder (bladder lacks control due to nerve or muscle problems). Clinical record review for Resident 60 revealed that she had a care plan, dated February 12, 2024, for an indwelling catheter that included an intervention to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to address and document the opportunity to formulate advance directives and failed to document in the resident's clinical record the resident's decision to accept or decline assistance to formulate advance directives for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 70). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding advance directives (instructions regarding the provision of health care and life sustaining measures when the resident is incapacitated), dated March 13, 2024, indicated that if the resident does not have an advance directive, facility staff must inform the resident or resident representative of their right to establish one as set forth in the laws of the state and provide assistance if the resident wishes to execute one or more directive(s). Facility staff must document in the resident's medical record these discussions and any advance directive(s) that the resident executes. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike environment for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 27). Findings include: The facility's policy titled housekeeping department operations, dated March 13, 2024, revealed that the policy objective was to provide a safe, clean environment for residents. A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 27, dated July 3, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with most daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included heart failure and osteoarthritis (a type of arthritis that effects the bone). Observations of Resident 27 sitting in his wheelchair on July 8, 2024, at 11:42 a.m. and July 9, 2024, at 12:18 p.m. revealed that there was a moderate accumulation of removable dust/debris on the wheels and the metal supports under the chair. Interview with Housekeeper 1 on July 9, 2024, at 2:05 p.m. confirmed that Resident 27's wheelchair was cleaned in June as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse from a resident who wanders for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 64). Findings include: The facility's policy for abuse, dated March 13, 2024, indicated each resident is provided with a safe environment where they are not subject to mental, physical, verbal, and sexual abuse. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies, serving the resident, family members, or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals. Abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Willful meant the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and legal guardian in writing regarding the reason for hospitalization for four of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 23, 36, 46, 67). Findings include: A significant Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 23, dated June 24, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Nursing notes for Resident 23, dated June 16, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. and 4:56 p.m., revealed that the resident was unresponsive, then vomited bright red blood and clots. She was transferred to the hospital and admitted with GI (gastro-intestinal) bleeding. There was no documented evidence that a written notice of Resident 23's transfer to the hospital was provided to the resident's responsible party regarding the reason for transfer. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 36, dated April 24, 2024, indicated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or the responsible party was notified about the facility's bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for four of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 23, 36, 46, 67). Findings include: The facility's policy for Bed Holds, dated March 13, 2024, indicated that all residents and/or their representatives shall be notified of the bed-hold policy, in writing through the admission agreement, on or before admission and upon transfer to the hospital. A significant Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 23, dated June 24, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Nursing notes for Resident 23, dated June 16, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. and 4:56 p.m., revealed that the resident was unresponsive, then vomited bright red blood and clots. She was transferred…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for three of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 103, 104, 105). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 days following admission. An admission MDS assessment for Resident 103, dated March 31, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and the resident's admission MDS assessment was dated as completed on April 8, 2024, which was 15 days after admission. An admission MDS assessment for Resident 104,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 60, 64). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, revealed that Section N0415F (Antibiotic Medications - medications used to treat infections) was to be coded if the resident took the medication during the seven-day look-back period. Physician's orders for Resident 60, dated June 8, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive one gram of Ceftazidime (antibiotic medication) intravenously (administration of fluids and/or medications directly into a person's vein) every eight hours for seven days for a urinary tract infection (infection involving any part of the urinary system including the kidney, ureters, bladder and urethra).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that baseline care plans included the information and instructions needed to provide person-centered care for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 25, 35). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated March 13, 2024, indicated that a baseline care plan is person-centered care plan designed to include the resident's basic healthcare information needed to care for the resident. It must be completed within forty-eight hours of admission and include initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services, address resident health and safety concerns, and identify needs for supervision, behavioral interventions, and assistance with care as necessary. The comprehensive care plan, which is derived from the baseline care plan and is triggered by care area assessments, will be entered into the electronic health record system. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in care needs for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 60). Findings include: A significant Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 60, dated June 14, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was clearly understood and able to understand others, required assistance with care needs, had a foley catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine from the bladder), had a urinary tract infection (infection involving any part of the urinary system including the kidney, ureters, bladder and urethra) in the last 30 days, and had a diagnosis that included neurogenic bladder (bladder lacks control due to nerve or muscle problems). Physician's orders for Resident 60, dated February 24, 2024, indicated that the resident was ordered 50 milligrams of Nitrofurantoin daily every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for history of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for medications were followed for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 62, 80). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated March 13, 2024, revealed that medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Right resident, right drug, right dose, right route, and right time are applied for each medication being administered. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 62, dated May 2, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat) and dementia. Physician's orders for Resident 62, dated December 2,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain the required information from the contracted hospice provider for two of four hospice residents reviewed (Residents 8, 34). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding the hospice program, dated March 13, 2024, indicated that the resident acknowledges that he or she has been given a full explanation and understands the purpose of hospice care, with the focus on providing comfort and support to the resident. The hospice provider will have a contract with the facility and a modified plan of care. An quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 8, dated June 14, 2024, revealed that the resident was moderately cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, and was receiving hospice services (end-of-life services). A hospice Election of Benefit document (a form signed to indicate that the individual waives all rights to traditional Medicare Part A payments for treatment related to the terminal illness) for Resident 8, dated August 23, 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending August 13, 2023, and a complaint investigation survey ending May 29, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility-maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending July 11, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, resident records being complete and accurate, and hospice services. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding the accuracy of assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for three of five residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 5). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated April 30, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for personal hygiene care, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Review of nurse aide documentation for Resident 1, dated March and April, 2024, revealed that care provided by a nurse aide was not documented by the dayshift nurse aide on March 4, 9, 27, and April 15, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 2024. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 2, dated May 24, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required substantial to maximum assist for personal hygiene care, and had diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis. Review of nurse aide documentation for Resident 2, dated March, April, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's dignity was maintained for one of 38 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding call lights, dated April 26, 2023, indicated that staff members who are alerted of an activated call light are responsible for responding promptly to promote a secure atmosphere for residents. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated July 22, 2023, revealed that the resident was alert and oriented, able to make her needs known, and required extensive assistance from staff for daily care needs including toileting, hygiene, and transfers. Interview with Resident 1 on August 28, 2023, at 11:51 a.m. revealed that she had to wait for an extended period of time for staff to respond to her call bell. She stated that she had a bowel movement and waited 53 minutes for staff to assist her off the bed pan. A call bell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances/concerns for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding grievance, complaints, and suggestions, dated April 26, 2023, indicated that when a resident or their representative voices a concern to direct care providers about resident services or service decisions, it would be documented by the staff member on a Corporate Grievance Complaint and or Suggestion Form and communicated to the supervisor on the date the concern was known. Resolution of the concern was desired within three to five working days from the date the concern was filed. Resident Council meeting minutes, dated June 9, 2023, revealed that when asked about nursing services, Resident 4 reported that he had waited one hour to be helped. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated August 2, 2023, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). The deficiency is being cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's policy on transcription of physician orders, dated April 26, 2023, indicated that physician orders will be transcribed accurately with the date of order, frequency, and reason for treatment. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated July 14, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assist for daily care needs, and had diagnosis that included high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and fracture of the lower end of right tibia (bone located in the lower leg). A fracture clinic consultation report for Resident 2, dated July 18, 2023, and completed by a physician, revealed that the resident was at the clinic for follow-up related to a fractured right leg. Physician's orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR LIVING — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PHIOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2009
BOWSER, NICOLEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/01/2011
VINETTE-CLAY, MELISSAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/19/2010
BIRDSALL, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
CHOTTINER, LAWRENCEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
ELLIOTT, BRENDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
GOLDSTEIN, TERRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
KELLY, SHARONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2011
KINARD, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2021
PAXTON, STUARTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
REIMANN, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2016
RHODES, CHERYLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
SCOTT, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
SEIBERT, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
SHROPSHIRE, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2017
STONE, ROBYNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
DAVIS, DANNYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/21/2018
HOFFMAN, CYNTHIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/02/2021
KRIEGER, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MCALISTER, DYANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/17/2016
WICKLINE, BEVERLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 6%Other / private 31%

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$482per resident / day
operating cost
$14,654per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$438per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395568. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next