Erwin Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 5.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 71.8 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 53 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, review of facility documentation, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to recognize and use the least restrictive interventions or restraint device for the least amount of time and failed to attempt a reduction to a least restrictive device or eliminate the restraint devices during the 30-day assessments. The facility's failure to recognize and use the least restrictive interventions or restraint device for the least amount of time and failure to attempt a reduction to a least restrictive device or eliminate the restraint devices during the 30-day assessments resulted in 4 residents of 29 residents (Residents #9, #13, #18, and #21) being placed in restraints that were not the least restrictive for an extended amount of time. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR RESTRAINTS AND SAFETY DEVICES, showed .Facility will use the least restrictive safety device or restraint to ensure safety of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-05-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, review of facility documentation, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to recognize and use the least restrictive interventions or restraint device for the least amount of time and failed to attempt a reduction to a least restrictive device or eliminate the restraint devices during the 30-day assessments. The facility's failure to recognize and use the least restrictive interventions or restraint device for the least amount of time and failure to attempt a reduction to a least restrictive device or eliminate the restraint devices during the 30-day assessments resulted in 4 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #9, #13, #18, and #21) being placed in restraints that were not the least restrictive for an extended amount of time. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR RESTRAINTS AND SAFETY DEVICES showed .Facility will use the least restrictive safety device or restraint to ensure safety of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident #322) of 9 residents were treated with dignity during the lunch meal service when residents at the same table were not served the meal at the same time. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #322 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, Dementia, and Psychotic Disorder. Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #322 dated 2/28/2025, revealed .Self-Care Deficit .Feeding .Provide assistance with ADLs [activities of daily living] . Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #322 scored a 4 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed the resident was dependent upon staff assistance with eating. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan related to vision impairment for 1 resident (Resident #68) of 19 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan Procedures, dated 2/2/2024, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan .for each resident .to meet a resident's medical .nursing .needs and all services that are identified in the residents' comprehensive assessment . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Glaucoma, and Need for Personal Care. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #68 scored a 5 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were properly contained in 1 of 2 dumpsters (dumpster A) and failed to ensure the outside dumpster area was maintained in a sanitary and orderly condition. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, dated 12/20/2024, revealed .refuse containers and dumpsters kept outside the facility shall .have tightly fitting lids, doors, or covers .surrounding area shall be kept clean so that accumulation of debris .are minimized .garbage should not accumulate or be left outside the dumpster . During an observation of the outside dumpster area and interview on 3/17/2025 at 12:15 PM, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), revealed 2 dumpsters for waste disposal. Further observation revealed dumpster A's front right sliding door was propped open which exposed the dumpster's contents to potential pests and the elements. Continued observation of the area behind dumpster A revealed 1 broken wooden chair, 9 broken wooden pallets (wet and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to offer hand hygiene assistance prior to meals for 2 residents (Residents #53 and #25) of 9 residents observed in the secure unit dining room. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Meal Supervision and Assistance, dated 12/20/2024, revealed .Be sure the resident's hands are washed before and after he or she has started .finished the meal . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #53 scored a 1 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed the resident required substantial/ maximal assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #53 revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment in the dietary department with the potential to affect 81 of 81 residents in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Cleaning and Sanitization in Dietary, dated 5/2021 showed The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner .All equipment, food contact surfaces .shall be washed to remove or completely loosen soils by using the manual or mechanical means necessary and sanitized .Manual washing and sanitizing will employ a three-step process .Scrape food particles and wash using hot water and detergent .Rinse with hot water to remove soap residue .Sanitize with hot water or chemical sanitizing solution . Review of facility log titled Cleaning Deep Fryer showed the last entry documented for cleaning of the deep fryer was 1/11/2022. During the initial kitchen observation and interview on 1/18/2022 at 10:50 AM, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the deep fryer had brown food debris present in the oil and a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-01-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan of Correction, medical record review, review of facility documentation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Improvement Committee identified issues and implemented corrective action plans with monitoring to ensure care plans were continuously updated and current to meet the resident's needs and to ensure equipment in the kitchen was sanitary for use to prepare resident meals. The facility's failure had the potential to effect 81 of 81 residents in the facility. The findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, MDS [Minimum Data Set] and Care Plan (Person Centered Care Plan) dated 5/2021, revealed .The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment .care plans should be person centered, and unique for the residents' specific needs Quarterly care plans are updated during the MDS lookback period and up to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-01-20 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment for 1 resident (Resident #17) of 18 residents reviewed for assessments. The findings include: Review of CMS's RAI Version 3.0 Manual Chapter 2 dated 10/2019 revealed .Guidelines to Assist in Deciding If a Change Is Significant or Not .Any decline in an ADL [Activity of Daily Living] physical functioning area where a resident is newly coded as Extensive assistance .since last assessment .Resident begins to use a restraint of any type when it was not used before . Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension, Hip Replacement, and Alzheimer's Disease. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 had severe cognitive impairment, required supervision with set up help for bed mobility, walking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, review of facility documents, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a comprehensive care plan to address a potential environmental hazard and failed to address the injury sustained from the environmental hazard for 1 resident (#80) of 18 residents reviewed. The facility's failure resulted in harm for Resident #80 who had entrapment of his left arm that resulted in soft tissue injuries. The findings include: Review of the facility policy MDS [Minimum Data Set] and Care Plan dated 5/2021, showed .A comprehensive, person-centered care plan includes objectives to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident . Medical record review revealed Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations due to Parkinson's Disease, Tremor, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to update a comprehensive care plan to reflect changes in care needs due to a decrease in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) function for 1 resident (#17) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS [Minimum Data Set] and Care Plan (Person Centered Care Plan) . dated 5/2021, revealed .The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment .care plans should be person centered, and unique for the residents' specific needs Quarterly care plans are updated during the MDS lookback period and up to seven days following the ARD [Assessment Reference Date] date . Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension, Hip Replacement, and Alzheimer's Disease. Record review of the MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 had severe cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-01-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, review of facility documents, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to provide an environment free from potential accident hazards, failed to investigate an incident that led to injury, and failed to implement interventions to prevent further avoidable accidents for 1 resident (#80) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: Review of the facility policy Investigating Incidents dated 5/2021, showed .The staff with the input of the attending physician will implement interventions to reduce the specific risk factors . Medical record review revealed Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations due to Parkinson's Disease, Tremor, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Diabetes, Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and History of Malignant Neoplasm of the Esophagus. Review of the Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,024 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $5,012 — penalty dated 2024-05-17
• $5,012 — penalty dated 2024-05-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GREEN TREE HEALTH MANAGEMENT — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $146K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN