Maimonides Health Center Of Virginia Beach
6401 Auburn Dr, Virginia Beach, VA 23464 · Non profit - Other · 120 certified beds · (757) 420-2512 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,626 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-17)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.6% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.8% | 1.6% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.4% | 18.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.0% | 3.6% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.0% | 15.6% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.1% | 20.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.6% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.0% | 4.7% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.3% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.0% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 42.7% | 73.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.9% | 22.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.5% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.27 | 1.52 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.07 | 1.48 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 590 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 262 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.6%CMS range 58.0–67.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 9.6–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 71.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 4.1–8.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.84 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to inform the the resident's representative and Nurse Practitioner of a change in condition for 2 of 10 residents (Resident #4, and #2) which resulted in harm at Past Non-Compliance, for Resident #4 in the survey sample.The findings included: 1.Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including nephrostomy tubes for urine excretion, chronic heart failure and chronic heart disease with 3 cardiac arterial bypass grafts, an artificial heart valve, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of only 26% revealing a severely weakened heart muscle. The Resident's admission weight was 120 pounds, and she used oxygen in the hospital and was ordered to be administered Oxygen at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed upon discharge. Review of the clinical record revealed nursing and physician progress notes dated 3-2-25, through 3-5-25 with the following condensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, secure text messaging, family interviews and review of facility documents, the facility's staff neglected to ensure a resident who was in severe abdominal pain received care and treatment in a timely for 2 of 10 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #4) in the survey sample which resulted in Harm for Resident #4. Past Non-Compliance was issued for this deficient practice.The findings include:1. 1.Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including nephrostomy tubes for urine excretion, chronic heart failure and chronic heart disease with 3 cardiac arterial bypass grafts, an artificial heart valve, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of only 26% revealing a severely weakened heart muscle. The Resident's admission weight was 120 pounds, and she used oxygen in the hospital and was ordered to be administered Oxygen at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed upon discharge. Review of the clinical record revealed nursing and physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family and staff interviews, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide adequate bathing and ADL care to a dependent resident (Resident #2) in a survey sample of 10 residents.The findings included.Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including nephrostomy tubes for urine excretion, chronic heart failure and chronic heart disease with 3 cardiac arterial bypass grafts, an artificial heart valve, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of only 26% revealing a severely weakened heart muscle. The Resident's admission weight was 120 pounds, and she used oxygen in the hospital and was ordered to be administered Oxygen at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed upon discharge.The Resident's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) records were reviewed and revealed bathing and showering records. Those records indicated that Resident #2 received a bed bath only 3 times, on 1-23-25, 1-24-25, and 3-2-25. Documents recorded refusals to be bathed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) in the survey sample.The findings included: The facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure Resident #1 was safe from falling while toiletingResident #1 was no longer a resident of the facility; therefore, a closed record review was conducted. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a hospital stay. The resident's diagnoses included acute kidney failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unsteadiness on feet, and chronic congestive heart failure. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE] coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 10 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #1's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. A synopsis of an event…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family and staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain hydration for one Resident (Resident #2) in a survey sample of 10 residents.The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE]. The discharge hospital orders were reviewed and revealed a hospital physician's order for labs to be drawn in 3 days, however, upon the resultant admission to the skilled nursing facility the Resident was ordered by the physician there to begin drawing labs on 1-29-25 (8 days after admission). The lab draw schedule then went on to be ordered randomly for 2-5-25, 2-8-25, 2-12-25, 2-18-25, and 3-4-25. Weights were ordered on admission, completed daily, and documented as revealed in the review of the clinical record. The hospital discharge summary did denote that if the Resident should experience a 3-pound weight gain in one day or a 5-pound weight gain in one week, that the cardiology physician should be contacted immediately.The Resident's care plan was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and a clinical record review, the facility staff failed to recognize and act on symptoms of an exacebation of heart failure for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #10), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #10 was originally admitted to the facility 3/6/2025 after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included chronic non-occlusive DVT and congestive heart failure with a reduced ejection factor of 30 percent. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/12/2025 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 5 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #10's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. An interview was conducted with Resident #10 on 4/9/25 at approximately 12:10 PM. Resident #10 stated she was with a dry cough and she needed to take some cough syrup her mother taught her to make and she had passed the recipe on to her daughter. The resident further stated the cold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and a clinical record review, the facility staff failed to prevent a pressure ulcer and manage care of an avoidable pressure ulcer after it was acquired for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #10), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #10 was originally admitted to the facility 3/6/2025 after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included chronic non-occlusive DVT and congestive heart failure with a reduced ejection factor of 30 percent. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/12/2025 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 5 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #10's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. An interview was conducted with Resident #10 on 4/9/25 at approximately 12:10 PM. Resident #10 stated she had an opened sore on her bottom and it was painful and itched, although the nurses put a bandage on it daily. The resident also stated she used a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to immediately notify the physician and also notify the Resident's Representative when there is a significant change in the resident condition for one Resident (#1) in a survey sample of 20 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to notify the Resident Representative of changes in skin condition, (injury of unknown origin, skin tear, possible pressure areas, and open area on shoulder). Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but are not limited to dementia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, age related physical debility, restlessness, dysphagia, insomnia, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis and pain. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of [DATE] coded Resident #1 as unable to assess, indicating Resident #1 has severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to implement the abuse, neglect policy for one (1) Resident (#1) in a survey sample of 20 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to implement the abuse policy when an injury of unknown origin was found. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #1 included but are not limited to dementia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, age related physical debility, restlessness, dysphagia, insomnia, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis and pain. Resident #1 ' s Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of [DATE] coded Resident #1 as unable to assess, indicating Resident #1 has severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set Coded Resident #1 as requiring 4- total dependence, on staff, for Activities of Daily Living care. Resident #1 expired in the facility on [DATE]. On [DATE] a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure the timely reporting of allegations of abuse and neglect, to include injury of unknown source, for one (1) Resident (#1) in a survey sample of 20 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #1 the facility did not report an injury of unknown origin in the required timeframes. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #1 included but are not limited to dementia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, age related physical debility, restlessness, dysphagia, insomnia, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis and pain. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of [DATE] coded Resident #1 as unable to assess, indicating Resident #1 has severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set, coded Resident #1 as requiring 4 total dependence, on staff, for Activities of Daily Living care. Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure allegations of abuse and neglect to include injuries of unknown origin, are thoroughly investigated for one (1) Resident (#1) in a survey sample of 20 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate a black and blue bruise to the Resident's chest area. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #1 included but are not limited to dementia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, age related physical debility, restlessness, dysphagia, insomnia, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis and pain. Resident #1 ' s Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of [DATE] coded Resident #1 as unable to assess, indicating Resident #1 has severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set, coded Resident #1 as requiring 4- total dependence, on staff, for Activities of Daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that the baseline care plan was person-centered and effective for one Resident ( Resident # 15) in a survey sample of 20 Residents. 1. For Resident # 15, the facility staff failed to address communication needs for a Spanish speaking resident. The findings included: For Resident #15, the facility staff failed to address communication needs for a Spanish speaking resident. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, Sepsis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B, Essential Hypertension and Peripheral Vascular Disease, anemia. Resident #15 was admitted the day prior to the start of the survey. Therefore,no Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed because it was too soon. indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of the clinical record was conducted on 4/92025-4/10/2025. Review of the baseline care plan revealed there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan that is reviewed and revised for one (1) Resident (#1) in a survey sample of 20 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan after injuries, skin tear, pressure areas, and failed to have the required members of interdisciplinary team input on one care plan meeting. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #1 included but are not limited to dementia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, age related physical debility, restlessness, dysphagia, insomnia, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis and pain. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 1/9/25 coded Resident #1 as unable to assess, indicating Resident #1 has severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set, coded Resident #1 as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure adequate nutrition to prevent significant weight loss for 1 Resident (#1) in a survey sample of 20 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #1 the facility failed to obtain recognize signs of significant weight loss and consult with the Registered dietician for recommendations as ordered by physician on several occasions, resulting in 29 lb. weight loss from 12/31/24 - 2/11/25. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #1 included but are not limited to dementia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, age related physical debility, restlessness, dysphagia, insomnia, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis and pain. Resident #1 ' s Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 1/9/25 coded Resident #1 as unable to assess, indicating Resident #1 has severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set, coded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and a clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance to accepted professional standards for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #9), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #9 was originally admitted to the facility 7/27/2023 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included afib, diabetes and high blood pressure. The admission significant change annual quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/17/2025 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #9's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. On 4/8/25 at approximately 10:54 AM, Resident #9 was observed in bed asleep. The resident did not answered when the door was knocked on. Upon entrance into the room to awaken the resident it was observed that a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to have a written agreement with hospice before hospice care is furnished for 1 Resident in a survey sample of 20 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to have a hospice contract before providing hospice services to the Resident and also failed to maintain hospice records within the clinical record. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #1 included but are not limited to dementia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, age related physical debility, restlessness, dysphagia, insomnia, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis and pain. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of [DATE] coded Resident #1 as unable to assess, indicating Resident #1 has severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set, coded Resident #1 as requiring 4- total dependence, on staff, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to adhere to hand hygiene practices to help prevent the development infections for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #9), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #9 was originally admitted to the facility 7/27/2023 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included afib, diabetes and high blood pressure. The admission significant change annual quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/17/2025 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #9's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. On 4/9/25 approximately at 11:24 AM, an observation of wound care to the resident's sacral pressure ulcer was conducted. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7 positioned the resident on his left side with help of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #7. LPN #7 sprayed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to respect and honor a resident's right to remain a full code for 1 of 7 residents in the survey sample, Resident #6. The findings included: For Resident #6, the facility staff entered an order for the resident to become a do not resuscitate/do not intubate (DNR/DNI) after the resident was admitted from the hospital as a full code and expressed wishes to remain a full code. On 7/11/24 at 3:35 PM the Administrator and The Director of Nursing were not able to find a signed DNR to support the order placed on 10/18/23-10/23/23 for Resident #6 being a DNR/DNI. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], status post right hip replacement from an acute care hospital. Diagnoses for Resident #6 included but are not limited to right hip replacement, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and seizure disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, the facility's staff failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 of 7 residents in the survey sample, Resident #7 and Resident #6. The findings included: 1. Resident #7, a post kidney transplant resident was administered 8 days of the wrong medication, Cyclophosphamide, a chemotherapy drug, instead of the prescribed Cyclosporine, a drug used to prevent organ rejection in people who have received a kidney transplant, during his short term stay for rehabilitation. Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility 4/08/24 after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included encounter for aftercare following kidney transplant and malignant neoplasm of unspecified kidney except renal pelvis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/14/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 9 out of a possible 15.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that the pharmacy provided one of 39 residents with the correct dosage of medication, Resident #15. The findings include: For Resident #15 (R15), the facility staff failed to ensure that the pharmacy provided 100 mg (milligram) of Gabapentin (1) as ordered. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/27/2022, the resident scored 12 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. The physician orders for R15 documented in part, Gabapentin 100 mg capsule, give 1 capsule (100 mg) by oral route every 12 hours. Schedule: Every day at 6:00 am; 6:00 pm; Original Order Date: 11/14/2022 . The progress notes for R15 documented in part, - 1/21/2023 6:01 a.m. Nursing. Note: During morning med pass, writer observed that gabapentin pills were incorrect dose. MD (medical doctor) order and sticker on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that one of 39 residents was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, Resident #21. The findings include: For Resident #21 (R21), the facility staff failed to implement physician approved pharmacy recommendations to reduce Paroxetine (1) in a timely manner resulting in the resident receiving 38 doses of 20 mg (milligrams) between 7/16/22 until 8/22/2022 instead of 10mg. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/30/2022, the resident scored nine out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. The assessment documented R21 receiving an antidepressant. A review of the monthly pharmacy medication regimen reviews for R21 documented a consultation report for R21 dated July 13, 2022 through July 14, 2022. The report documented in part, .Recommendation: Please consider Paroxetine 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, observations, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review it was determined the facility staff failed to promote dignity for one of 39 residents in the survey sample, Resident #96. The findings include: For Resident #96 (R96), the facility staff failed to maintain a urinary catheter bag in a manner to prevent the contents from being seen from the hallway. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/19/2022, the resident scored eight out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating that the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. The assessment documented the resident having a urinary catheter. On 1/24/2023 at 2:25 p.m., an observation was made of R96 in their room. R96 was observed asleep in bed, a urinary catheter bag was observed attached to the bed frame on the right side of the bed facing the doorway. Approximately 300 ml (milliliter) of yellow urine was observed in the bag from the hallway. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate MDS (minimum data set) resident assessment for one of 39 residents in the survey sample, Resident #84. The findings include: For Resident #84 (R84), the facility staff failed to code the quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/28/2022 for a urinary catheter. On the most recent MDS assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/28/2022, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section H0100 failed to evidence documentation of use of an indwelling catheter. The physician orders for R84 documented in part, Indwelling catheter r/t (related to) urinary retention d/t (due to) BPH (benign prostatic hypertrophy). Original order date: 9/14/2022 . The comprehensive care plan for R84 documented in part, Catheter: Indwelling r/t BPH with obstruction, Foley cath (catheter) size: 16…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one of 39 residents, Resident #21. The findings include: For Resident #21 (R21), the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for the use of floor mats as ordered. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/30/2022, the resident scored nine out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. Section G documented R21 being totally dependent on two or more staff for transfers and requiring extensive assistance from one staff member for toileting and personal hygiene. Section J documented R21 having one fall with no injury since the prior assessment. On 1/24/2023 at 1:33 p.m., an observation was made of R21 in their room. R21 was observed in bed with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement fall interventions as ordered for one of 39 residents, Resident #21. The findings include: For Resident #21 (R21), the facility staff failed to implement fall mats as ordered. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/30/2022, the resident scored nine out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. Section G documented R21 being totally dependent on two or more staff for transfers and requiring extensive assistance from one staff member for toileting and personal hygiene. Section J documented R21 having one fall with no injury since the prior assessment. On 1/24/2023 at 1:33 p.m., an observation was made of R21 in their room. R21 was observed in bed with a fall mat in place on the floor to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that pharmacy recommendations were reviewed and implemented in a timely manner for one of 39 residents, Resident #21. The findings include: For Resident #21 (R21), the facility staff failed to implement physician approved pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/30/2022, the resident scored nine out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. A review of the monthly pharmacy medication regimen reviews for R21 documented a consultation report for R21 dated July 13, 2022 through July 14, 2022. The report documented in part, .Recommendation: Please consider Paroxetine (1) 10 mg (milligram) QD (every day). Rationale for Recommendation: The manufacturer recommends dosing modification in individuals with kidney disease .Physician's Response: I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-10 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of resident discharges for 5 of 48 residents (Resident #11, #95, #107, #2, and #114) after being transferred to the hospital. The findings included: 1. Resident #11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #11 included but not limited to Heart Failure Unspecified and Orthostatic Hypertension. Resident #11's current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly revision with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/12/19 coded the resident with a 7 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. The Discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] - discharge return anticipated, resident re-admitted on [DATE]. The was no evidence that the Ombudsman was notified of the discharge. On 10/10/19 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-10 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a facility document, clinical record reviews and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to encode and/or electronically transmit discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid System, for 9 of 48 residents in the survey sample, Resident #216, #217, #218, #219, #220, #221, #222, #223, & #224). The findings include: Review of the MDS 3.0 Missing Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) Assessment report obtained by the facility's staff from the CMS website revealed no MDS OBRA assessments and/or MDS Discharge Assessment had been submitted for the following residents in greater than 92 days. Resident #216 was admitted to the facility 5/25/18, and was discharged from the facility with return not anticipated 7/3/18. The last assessment accepted into the MDS databank was dated 6/1/18. An interview was conducted with the MDS Coordinator on 10/10/19, at approximately 10 a.m., she stated the resident's discharge MDS was completed and transmitted to CMS 7/9/18, but CMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure that food was prepared, stored and served under sanitary conditions. During an inspection of the Facility kitchen occurring 10/08/2019 through 10/10/2019, it was found that the Facility staff: 1. Stored unlabeled, expired food in the refrigerator and freezer. 2. Kept and served food under the required temperature. The findings included: During an initial inspection of the facility kitchen on 10/8/2019 at approximately 11:37 a.m., a reading of pureed quiche showed a holding temperature of 111 degrees. Further observation yielded that the quiche was served on trays to be distributed to residents. During an interview with the Dietary Manager on 10/10/2019 at approximately 2:45 p.m., when asked about serving pureed quiche under required temperatures, his response was, According to our policy, the quiche was served just under the required temperature of 115 degrees. During an inspection of the facility dairy kitchen refrigerator on 10/8/2019 at approximately 11:40 a.m., it was noted that the label on an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure that food storage, preparation, dining, and conference areas were free of visible signs of flies. The findings included: During an initial inspection of the kitchen and dining area on 10/8/2019 at approximately 11:37 a.m., flies were observed on covered dishes of peach cobbler and dining room tables. Additionally, flies were observed within the volunteer conference room. An interview was conducted on 10/10/2019 at approximately 2:26 p.m. with the Dietary Manager regarding observations of flies in the kitchen, dining area and volunteer conference room. The Dietary Manager responded, We have a fly deterrent system that uses ultra-violet lights to attract flies. We also have an air curtain at the back door to deter flies. The ultra-violet lights attract the flies and then glue sticks inside the light fixtures, kill them. Facility provided Pest Control Policy & Procedure: 1. Monitor access to the facility by pests and insects. 2. Deny pests food, water, and hiding/nesting places. 3. Wet towels and mop heads…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-10 · tag F0948 — patternEnsure that paid feeding assistants have the training they need.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to certify an individual feeding residents participated in a state approved feeding assistant program. The findings included: During the initial tour of the dining room observation on the dementia care unit located on Sholom Hall a Unit Secretary was observed feeding residents on three occasions. On 10/08/19 at approximately 12:40 PM, the Unit Secretary (Other Staff #6) was observed feeding two residents in the dining area on Sholom Hall. On 10/09/19 at approximately 12:41 PM, the Unit Secretary (Other Staff #6) was observed feeding a resident in the dining area on Sholom Hall. Other Staff #6 was asked how long has she been assisting residents with feeding. She stated that she's been assisting residents for fours years. She voluntarily made a copy of a Certificate of Completion. The reading on the certificate stated that she had successfully completed the Assisted Oral Feedings in Adults dated August 01, 2015. The following interviews were conducted: On 10/10/19 at approximately 10:03…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility staff failed to conduct quarterly assessments for one resident (Resident #2) in the survey sample of 48 residents. The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, previous stroke and history of progressive MS (multiple sclerosis), depression and neuropathic bladder. The Initial Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], coded this resident in the area of Cognitive Patterns - Brief Interview Minimum Status (BIMS) score as a 9 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. A Care Plan updated 04/16/19 indicated: Cognition- potential late effects of comorbidities, forgetfulness, potential effects of current medication regimen. - Intervention- Staff to anticipate needs. Limit/structure choices to avoid frustration. The clinical record was reviewed and the initial MDS was performed on 01/15/19, however there were no Quarterly MDS's for April or July 2019. During an interview on 10/09/19 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure a level I PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) screening was completed prior to admission for 1 of 48 residents in the survey sample, Resident #95. The findings included: Resident #95 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to, Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a quarterly dated 08/21/19 which coded the resident with having short-term and long-term memory problems and the resident's cognitive skills for decision making moderately impaired. In Section A1500-Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, it was not coded. On 10/10/19 at approximately 2:18 PM an interview was conducted with the Admissions Director (Other Staff #10). She was asked for a copy of Resident #95's Level 1 PASRR screening. She stated, We don't have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of quality for 1 (Resident #95) of 48 residents in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to follow physician orders by administering oxygen without a Physician's order. The findings include: Resident #95 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #95 included but not limited to Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a quarterly dated 08/21/19 and coded the resident with having short-term and long-term memory problems and cognitive skills for decision making moderately impaired. Section O, Special Treatments and Programs, 0100C, Respiratory Treatments, on the MDS was not coded for Resident #95 receiving oxygen. A review of the MAR (Medication Administration Record) for the month of October, 2019 revealed no oxygen orders where included. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 48 residents (Resident #33) in the survey sample who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain fingernail care. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure that fingernail care was provided to Resident #33. Resident #33 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #33 included but not limited to Anxiety and Depression. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), an annual assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/19/19, coded Resident #33 with a 05 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #33 requiring total dependence of one with bathing and limited assistance of one with hygiene. Resident #33's comprehensive care plan with a revision date of 11/04/19, under loss of ADL function,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, clinical record review,and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 48 residents (Resident #44) in the survey sample who were unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services for toenail care. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure that podiatry services was provided to Resident #44. Resident #44's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/17/19 coded Resident #44's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of a possible score of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #44 total dependence of two with transfer, toilet dependence of one with dressing, hygiene and bathing, extensive assistance of two with bed mobility and toilet use and extensive assistance of one with eating for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Resident #44's comprehensive care plan with a revision date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility's staff failed to obtain a physician's order prior to applying bilateral arm/hand splints for 1 of 48 residents (Resident #60), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #60 was originally admitted to the facility 10/28/18 and has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; polyosteoarthritis with stiffness of the elbows and pain to bilateral hands. The quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/7/19 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 8 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #60 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. In section G (physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance of one person with bed mobility and personal hygiene, total care of two with transfers and toileting, and total care of two with locomotion, dressing, eating, and bathing. Resident #60 was observed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 8 medication carts ([NAME] Unit) was kept locked or under direct observation of authorized staff in an area where residents could access it; and failed to remove expired biological's from 1 of 3 Medication Storage Rooms (Sholom Unit). The findings included: 1. On [DATE] at 12:45 p.m., the Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 prepare medications while standing in front of the medication cart in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The LPN and Surveyor walked into room [ROOM NUMBER]; the medication cart was left unlocked. The LPN closed the door to room [ROOM NUMBER]. On [DATE] at approximately 1:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN #4. The above observation was reviewed with LPN #4 and she was asked, Should you have left the medication cart unlocked and unsupervised when you went into room [ROOM NUMBER] and closed the door? LPN #4 stated, No, I should have locked the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-10 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility's staff failed to provide a handled cup at meal times for 1 of 48 residents (Resident #60), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #60 was originally admitted to the facility 10/28/18 and has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included: polyosteoarthritis with stiffness of the elbows and pain to bilateral hands. The quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/7/19 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 8 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #60 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance of one person with bed mobility and personal hygiene, total care of two with transfers and toileting, and total care of two with locomotion, dressing, eating, and bathing. Resident #60 was observed in her room having lunch 10/8/19 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to have a water management plan for the facility; and failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene after removing dirty gloves for 1 of 48 residents in the survey sample (Resident #342). The findings included: 1. On 10/08/2019 at approximately 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director and he was asked for the facility's Legionella protocol. The Maintenance Director stated, We don't do any testing for Legionella. We do not have a problem with Legionella because we have a closed loop system, chiller system, and it is chemically treated. On 10/09/2019 at approximately 11:30 p.m., the facility risk assessment was reviewed and revealed the Probability of Water Contamination was scored as low. On 10/09/2019 at 12:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director and he was asked, Do you have a water management policy and procedure? The Maintenance Director stated, No, we do not. The Maintenance Director was asked, Do you have any water testing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and sanitary environment and for 1 of 48 residents (Resident #43) in the survey sample. The finding included: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #43's personal wheel chair was maintained in a sanitary condition. Resident #43 was originally admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #43 included but not limited to Glaucoma. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/17/19 coded Resident #43 with a 15 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #43 requiring extensive assistance of one with transfers. The MDS was coded under section G 0600 for the use of a wheel chair for mobility devices. During the initial tour of the facility on 10/08/19 at approximately 12:10 p.m., Resident #43 was observed sitting up in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-04-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner. The findings included: On 4/17/18 at approximately 11:15 AM during the initial Kitchen tour, the Dietary Manager was asked the use by date on one 5 pound package of Mozzarella cheese in the walk-in refrigerator. The Dietary Manager looked for an expiration date on the cheese and she did not find one. The Dietary Manager stated she still had the box the cheese came in. The Dietary Manager was asked if all boxes that food product came in were saved and she stated, No. The Dietary Manager was asked if it was her expectation for her staff to go in search of boxes to find out the use by date and she stated, No. There was not posting observed in the walk in refrigerator of Use by dates. On 4/18/18 at approximately 10:50 AM, the Dietary Manager showed the box the cheese came in. The Dietary Manager again was asked if it was her expectation for dietary staff to go in hunt of boxes to determine a use by date. The Dietary Manager…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2018-04-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility staff failed to obtain a written agreement with the dialysis center and failed to maintain communication with the dialysis center providing services for 1 of 27 residents in the survey sample (Resident #87). Findings included: Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited too, hypertension, GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease), syncope with collapse, unspecified systolic (congestive) heart failure, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), dependence on renal dialysis, and gout. Resident #87 had an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on [DATE]. The assessment indicated resident #87 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) assessment score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Section O0100 J. indicated the resident received dialysis services. Resident #87's functional status was coded as limited assistance needed for self-performance and staff assistance of one staff member for bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-04-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order for self-administration of medications for 1 of 27 residents in the survey sample (Resident#63), and failed to ensure medications obtained from outside of the facility were properly labeled and stored. 1. The facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order for self-administration of Pepto-Bismol and Tylenol for Resident #63. 2. Facility staff failed to date multiple bottles of medication after opening on two of three medication carts inspected, and one medication room. 3. The facility staff failed to ensure 1 open multi-dose vial of Aplisol (tuberculin skin test serum) was dated correctly when opened. A review of the facility policy for: Bulk Medications, Dispensing of dated February 2017 notes: 4. Date and time each container when opened. The findings included: 1. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to, Respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-04-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a sanitary environment for four residents in a survey sample of 27 Residents (#37, #11, #68, #67). 1. The facility staff failed to clean Oxygen concentrator filters for resident #37. 2. The facility staff failed to clean Oxygen concentrator filters for resident #11. 3. The facility staff failed to clean Oxygen concentrator filters for resident #68. 4. The facility staff failed to maintain Resident #67's wheelchair in a sanitary condition. The findings include: 1. Resident # 37 was originally admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of *Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. *Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease makes it hard for a resident to breath. Source: (https://medlineplus.gov/copd.html). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 1/3/2018. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 5 out of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-04-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to revise person-centered comprehensive care plan for 1of 27 sample residents (Resident #12). The facility staff failed to revise Resident #12's person-centered comprehensive care plan to include Oxygen therapy. The finding include: Resident #12 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include but not limited to Bipolar Disorder, Dementia, Hypothyroidism. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #12 was a quarterly with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/17/2018. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 6 out of a possible 15, which indicated that resident #12 has severe cognitive impairment. Resident #12's Physicians Order was reviewed on 4/18/2018. An order dated 3/22/2018 was written to administer Oxygen 2Liter/min via nasal cannula: Every day at 7:00 am -3:00 pm; 3:00 pm -11:00 pm; 11:00 pm - 7:00 am. The Person-Centered Comprehensive Care Plan initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-04-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, resident observation, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed ensure the clinical record was accurate for one (1) of 27 residents (Resident #88) in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to ensure the Resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April 2018 was accurate for the removal of Resident #88's Lidocaine Patch. The findings included: Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #88 included but not limited to *Pain (unspecified). *Pain is an unpleasant sensation that can range from mild, localized discomfort to agony (https://www.medicinenet.com). The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a comprehensive assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/06/18 coded the resident with a 15 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance of one with toilet use, personal hygiene and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2018-04-20 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to accurately code a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one of 27 residents in the survey sample (Resident #27). The facility staff failed to accurately code a Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #37 to include Oxygen therapy. The Finding include: Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of *Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease. *Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease makes it hard for a resident to breath. Source: (https://medlineplus.gov/copd.html). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 1/3/2018. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 5 out of a possible 15 which indicated that Resident #37 had severe cognitive impairment. The Person-Centered Comprehensive Care Plan initiated on 10/23/2014 identified that Resident #37 had COPD: Impaired gas exchange. Interventions: Oxygen per as ordered.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,626 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $8,404 — penalty dated 2025-11-17
- $14,284 — penalty dated 2025-11-17
- $1,764 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
- $3,174 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GREEN TREE HEALTH MANAGEMENT — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BETH ABRAHAM VILLAGE OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2023 |
| GSGH VB HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 5% | since 07/01/2023 |
| MBM 2016 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 5% | since 07/01/2023 |
| PC8 CAPITAL GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 08/01/2024 |
| STERN, AHARON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| FIELDS, JOSEPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/21/2025 |
| 10-26 NATIONWIDE TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| 1026 ENTERPRISES II, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| ADS CAPITAL TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| SJ FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| SJ HEALTHCARE CAPITAL LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495186. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-01-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.