No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Poplar Hill Health And Rehab

360 Hospital Drive, Warrenton, VA 20186 · For profit - Corporation · 113 certified beds · (540) 316-5500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (540) 316-5500 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
330 Hospital Dr · (540) 347-6400 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
381 Stuyvesant St · (540) 347-2233 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.3 mi
613 Frost Ave · (540) 349-8222 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Gold Cup Dr · (540) 349-2520 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
578 Waterloo Rd · (571) 408-1515

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.1%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.0%18.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%3.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.4%15.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.6%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.7%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.4%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.5%73.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission10.1%22.3%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.5%11.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.621.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.941.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.1%CMS range 45.1–66.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.9%CMS range 5.9–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.4–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
51.0%
Total nursing turnover
61.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 113 beds and averages 104.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-08-02)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2022-01-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care for one of eight residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include:For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to follow standard of care for resident with persistent complaints of decreased blood pressure (BP), dizziness, and gastrointestinal (GI) (1) symptoms and little to no improvement in symptoms and no evidence of discussion or implementation of an alternative plan of care. On the most recent minimum data set (MDS), quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/8/2026, the patient's BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score was assessed at 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The resident admission demographic information documented R1 being their own responsible party and two alternates as emergency contacts. -A review of Attending Physician's notes on 3/6/2026 at 17:15 (5:15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, facility staff failed to provide residents with the correct amount of food according to the facility's menu in one of one facility kitchens.The findings include:On 05/12/2026 at approximately 12:00 p.m. an observation in the facility's kitchen revealed Dietary Manager plating lunch for the residents. The lunch menu consisted of whole chicken leg quarters, whole mixed vegetables, cubed potatoes, chopped chicken, pureed chicken, mash potatoes and pureed mixed vegetables. Observations of the serving utensils being used by the Dietary Manager to plate the food revealed she was using a green handle scoop for whole mixed vegetables, cubed potatoes, chopped chicken, ground chicken, pureed chicken, mash potatoes and pureed mixed vegetables. Continued observations revealed the Dietary Manager placed one scoop of each of the food items list above on each of the residents' lunch plates.The facility's Diet Spreadsheet for lunch on 05/12/2026 documented in part, Week 3. Tuesday. Regular. Lunch. Seasoned diced potatoes. Portion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to serve palatable food on one of four facility units, the 400 Unit.The findings include:On 05/12/2026 at 12:00 p.m. the holding temperatures for the resident's food for lunch were obtained by the Dietary Manager in the facility's kitchen at steam table with the following results: whole chicken leg quarter-168 F (degrees Fahrenheit), whole mixed vegatables-187 F, diced potatoes- 159 F, Chopped chicken-160 F, ground chicken-166 F, pureed chicken-158 F, mashed potatoes-177 F, pureed mixed vegatables-172 F. On 05/12/2026 at 12:48 p.m., a test tray consisting of all the food item listed below was placed on a cart with other meal trays for residents and taken to the 400 Unit. At 1:10 p.m., the last lunch tray was served to a resident on the 400 Unit. The Dietary Manager was then asked to remove the covers from the two test plates and proceeded to take the temperatures of the food. Two surveyors observed Dietary Manager obtaining the food temperatures. The whole chicken leg quarter-127 F, whole…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to prepare food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchens.The findings include:On 05/12/2026 at approximately 11:30 an observation of OSM (other staff member) #3 kitchen aide in the facility's kitchen revealed she was placing covers on approximately 20 cups of a beverage for the resident's lunch. Further observations of OSM #3 failed to evidence she was wearing a hairnet.On 05/12/2026 at approximately 11:30 an observation of a ladder cart in the facility's kitchen revealed trays of approximately 12 plated slices of cake on each tray next to the kitchen steamer and in front of a food preparation table. Further observation of the cart failed to evidence covering over the cart of the individual slices of cake.On 5/12/26 at approximately 12:34 p.m. an observation of lunch trays being delivered to resident rooms on the 200 unit revealed the trays served with cake were uncovered, at approximately 12:45 p.m. an observation of lunch trays being delivered to resident rooms on the 300 unit revealed the trays…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the medical provider of changes in condition one of eight residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include:For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to notify the medical provider of change in condition on 3/26/2026.On the most recent minimum data set (MDS), quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/8/2026, the patient's BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score was assessed at 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions.The resident admission demographic information documented R1 being their own responsible party and two alternates as emergency contacts. R1 diagnoses include but are not limited to hypertension (1), peripheral vascular disease (2) and diabetes mellitus (3). The progress notes for R1 documented in part, -A review of the Attending Physician's note on 3/16/2026 at 6:43 PM, the resident's BP (blood pressure) was 120/74. -A review of the NP's (nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide care and services to meet professional standards for one of eight residents, Resident #4.The findings include: The facility staff failed to meet professional standards by administering medications as ordered for Resident #4 (R4).R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (A-fib), HTN (hypertension), CHF (congestive heart failure) and DM (diabetes mellitus).The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/14/26, coded the resident as scoring a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section GG-functional abilities and goals coded the resident as being dependent for transfer, hygiene, bathing/dressing and set up for eating. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident/staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for dependent residents for one of eight residents, Resident #4.The findings include: The facility staff failed to provide ADL specifically incontinence care for a dependent resident, Resident #4 (R4).R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, HTN (hypertension), CHF (congestive heart failure) and DM (diabetes mellitus).The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/14/26, coded the resident as scoring a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section GG-functional abilities and goals coded the resident as being dependent for transfer, hygiene, bathing/dressing and set up for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to assist in arrangement of follow up vision services for one of eight residents in the survey sample, Resident #5. The findings include:For Resident #5 (R5), the facility staff failed to evidence arrangement of a follow-up ophthalmology (1) appointment. On the most recent minimum data set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/8/26, R5 scored two out of 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment, indicating they were severely impaired for making daily decisions. The assessment further documented R5 having diagnoses that included but were not limited to aphasia (2) and cerebral infarction (3). The progress notes for R5 documented in part,- Effective Date: 03/31/2026 23:19 (11:19 PM) Type: [Name of wound care practice] skin and wound note . Per nursing anf [sic] primary NP (nurse practitioner) request, wound team consult to new skin rash to face. Upon assessment, Pt noted to have Herpes Zoster (4)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide pharmacy services for two of eight residents in the survey sample, Residents #3, and #5. The findings include:1. For Resident #3 (R3), the facility staff failed to ensure the medication Ciprofloxacin (an antibiotic) was available for administration 3/23/26 through 3/25/26. A review of R3's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 3/23/26 for Ciprofloxacin 500mg (milligrams)- one tablet two times a day for five days for a urinary tract infection. R3's March 2026 MAR (medication administration record) documented the same physician's order. A nurse's note dated 3/23/26 documented, Ciprofloxacin Oral Tablet 500 MG (milligrams). Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) for 5 Days. Waiting for pharmacy to deliver medication. A nurse's note dated 3/24/26 documented, Cipro not available. Mistakenly signed it. Pharmacy will deliver later. A nurse's note dated 3/25/26 documented, Ciprofloxacin Oral Tablet 500 MG. Give 1 tablet by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow medication orders for administration for one of eight residents in the survey sample, Resident #5. The findings include:For Resident #5 (R5), the facility staff failed to hold medication according to the ordered parameters. The physician orders for R5 documented in part, Metoprolol Succinate ER (extended release) (1) Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 25 MG (milligram) (Metoprolol Succinate) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for HTN (hypertension) hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure) <100 or HR (heart rate) <60. Start Date: 04/24/2026. Review of the eMAR (electronic medication administration record) for R5 dated 4/1-4/30/2026 documented the Metoprolol Succinate ER administered on 4/25/2026 at 9:00 AM with a heart rate documented at 55. On 5/13/2026 at 9:20 AM, an interview was conducted with licensed practical nurse (LPN) #2 who stated that when administering medication that contained administration parameters they checked the vital signs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for four of 22 residents in the survey sample, Residents #38, #39, #242 and #35. The findings include: 1. For Resident #38, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for administering pain medications per the physician orders. The comprehensive care plan dated, 5/27/2023 documented in part, Focus: (R38) is at risk for acute pain due to her osteoarthritis, limited ROM (range of motion) to her neck and kidney stones. The Interventions documented in part, Pain patches to neck and knee per MD (medical doctor) order. Observation was made of RN (registered nurse) #3, administering medications on 8/1/2023 at 8:42 a.m. to R38. RN #3 prepared the medications. She pulled out two Aspercreme Pad Lido (lidocaine) 4% pads. One was for the resident's neck, and one was for the resident's left knee. RN #3 entered the room and administered the oral medications. She then placed one of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide dialysis care and services for one of 22 residents in the survey sample, Resident #35. The findings include: The facility failed to provide a bagged lunch for Resident #35 to take with him to the dialysis appointment or offer additional food prior to going to dialysis. Resident #35 was admitted with diagnoses that include but are not limited to: ESRD (end stage renal disease. Resident #35's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 6/7/23, coded the resident as scoring 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired. A review of MDS Section O-Special Procedures: coded the resident as dialysis-yes. A review of the comprehensive care plan dated 12/12/19 and revised on 6/30/23, revealed, FOCUS: Resident has end stage renal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer medications per the physician order for one of 22 residents in the survey sample, Resident #38. The findings include: For Resident #38 (R38), the facility staff failed to remove a lidocaine patch per the physician orders. Observation was made of RN (registered nurse) #3, administering medications on 8/1/2023 at 8:42 a.m. to R38. RN #3 prepared the medications. She pulled out two Aspercreme Pad Lido (lidocaine) 4% pads. One was for the resident's neck, and one was for the resident's left knee. RN #3 entered the room and administered the oral medications. She then placed one of the Aspercreme Pads to the back of the resident's neck. She proceeded to the other side of the bed and pulled back the covers off the resident's left knee. The Aspercreme pad was still on the resident's left knee, dated 7/31/2023. RN #3 stated she could not just remove the patch and apply the new one as there was an order to remove it after 12 hours of being on.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement fall interventions for one of 22 residents in the survey sample, Resident #242. The findings include: For Resident #242 (R242), the facility staff failed to place a fall mat on the floor to the left side of the bed while he was lying in bed. R242 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to convulsion (1). R242's admission MDS (minimum data set) was not due at the time of the survey. On 08/01/23 at approximately 1:30 p.m., R242 was observed lying in bed asleep. Further observation failed to evidence a fall mat on the floor next to the bed. On 08/01/23 at approximately 3:20 p.m., R242 was observed lying in bed asleep. Further observation failed to evidence a fall mat on the floor next to the bed. The physician's order for R242 documented in part, Fall mat in place to left side of bed when resident is in bed. Order Date: 07/31/2023. The comprehensive care plan for R242 documented in part, Focus. (R242) is at risk for falls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide services to attempt to restore bladder and bowel continence for one of 22 residents in the survey sample, Resident #25. The findings include: For Resident #25 (R25), the facility staff failed to provide evidence of attempting to restore her bladder and bowel function after admission to the facility. R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/26/23, R25 was coded as having no cognitive impairment for making daily decisions, having scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). She was coded as being frequently incontinent of both bowel and bladder. On the admission MDS (8/28/22) and the quarterly assessments (11/21/22 and 2/21/23) since her admission, she was also coded as being frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. On all of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store food in a sanitary manner in one of one kitchen areas. The findings include: The facility staff failed to date and/or dispose of opened food. On 7/31/23 at 9:15 AM, an observation was conducted in the main kitchen. In the freezer, one of two five-pound frozen hash browns packed in a plastic bag had been torn open. There was no label on the bag of the date it was opened or expiration date. An interview was conducted on 7/31/23 at 9:20 AM with OSM (other staff member) #1, the chef/dietary supervisor. When asked to review the opened hash brown bag, OSM #1 stated, They must have just opened this with breakfast service. It should not be open like this. I will remove it. The ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, and ASM #2, the director of nursing was made aware of the finding on 8/1/23 at 4:15 PM. The facility's Infection Control Sanitation/Safety Guidelines policy dated 8/2013, revealed the following, Storage: The objective is to maintain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for four of 31 residents in the survey sample, Residents #51, #8, #5, and #6. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to offer non-pharmacological interventions and document the location of pain prior to the administration of pain medications per the comprehensive care plan for Resident #51. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to: stroke (abnormal condition in which hemorrhage or blockage of the blood vessels of the brain leads to oxygen lack and resulting symptoms - sudden loss of ability to move a body part [as an arm or parts of the face], or to speak, paralysis weakness or if severe, death) (1), hemiplegia (paralysis affecting only one side of the body (2), Bipolar Disorder (a mental disorder characterized by episodes of mania and depression) (3), and chronic pain syndrome.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain daily weights according to the physician's orders for 1 of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 5. The findings include: Resident # 5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: high blood pressure, heart failure and cancer of the liver. Resident # 5's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/27/2021, coded Resident # 5 as scoring a four on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS), indication the resident is severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The POS [physician's order sheet] for Resident # 5 documented in part, Daily weight every day for Heart Failure. If weight greater than 3LBS (three pounds) in 1 day and/or greater than 5LBS (five pounds) in 1 week - reweigh immediately notify MD (medical doctor) loss/gain. Date Order: 03/26/2021. Start Date: 03/27/2021. The comprehensive care plan for Resident # 5 with a revision date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to identify and monitor targeted behaviors for the use of psychotropic medications for two of 31 residents in the survey sample, Residents #40 and #6. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to identify and monitor targeted behaviors for the use of Seroquel (used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and in combination with other medications to treat depression) (1) for Resident #40. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: anxiety disorder (state of mild to severe apprehension, often without specific cause, resulting in body changes such as quickened heartbeat and sweat.) (2), mood disorder (a mood disorder, feeling sad or irritable, affects a person's everyday emotional state.) (3), depression (a dejected state of mind with feelings of sadness, discouragement, and hopelessness, often accompanied by reduced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide written notice of hospital transfer for one of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #45. Resident #45 transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The facility staff failed to provide written notice of the transfer to the resident representative or ombudsman. The findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45's diagnoses included but were not limited to high blood pressure, heart disease and major depressive disorder. Resident #45's quarterly minimum data set assessment with an assessment reference date of 11/22/21 coded the resident's cognition as severely impaired. Review of Resident #45's clinical record revealed a nurse's note that documented the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for a left knee wound. Further review of Resident #45's clinical record failed to reveal evidence that written notice of the transfer was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility document review and staff interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence a bed hold notice was provided to 1 of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #254. Written bed hold notice was not provided to Resident #254 or their responsible party after admission to the hospital on [DATE]. The findings include: Resident #254 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to malignant neoplasm of bladder (1) and end stage renal disease (2). Resident #254's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission five-day assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/22/2022, coded Resident #254 as scoring a 12 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment, 12- being moderately impaired for making daily decisions. The progress notes for Resident #254 documented in part, - 11/9/2021 07:52 (7:52 a.m.) Note Text: resident appears shaky this morning. Vital signs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to accurately code a Resident's MDS (minimum data set) assessment for 1 of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #8. For Resident #8, the facility staff failed to accurately code the 11/01/2021 MDS for hospice care. The findings include: Resident # 8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: high blood pressure, low iron and breast cancer. Resident # 8's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/01/2021, coded Resident # 8 as scoring a 0 (zero) out of 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS), with 0 indicating the resident is severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Section O Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs failed to code Resident # 8 as receiving hospice. The POS (physician's order sheet) for Resident # 8 documented in part, Admit to LTC (long term care) for hospice service - [Name of Hospice Organization]. Date Order:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan after a readmission to the facility for 1 of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #254. There is no evidence to support that Resident #254 and/or the responsible party were provided a written summary of the care plan after the readmission to the facility on [DATE]. The findings include: Resident #254 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to malignant neoplasm of bladder (1) and end stage renal disease (2). Resident #254's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission five-day assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/22/2021, coded Resident #254 as scoring a 12 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment, 12- being moderately impaired for making daily decisions. The progress notes for Resident #254 documented in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #45. The facility staff failed to review and revise Resident #45's comprehensive care plan for anticoagulant (blood thinning) medication use. The findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45's diagnoses included but were not limited to high blood pressure, heart disease and major depressive disorder. Resident #45's quarterly minimum data set assessment with an assessment reference date of 11/22/21, coded the resident's cognition as severely impaired. Review of Resident #45's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 8/10/21 for Xarelto (1) 20 mg (milligrams) - one tablet by mouth in the evening for a right lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (blood clot). Review of Resident #45's January 2022 medication administration record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for the clarification of physician orders for pain medications for one of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #51. The findings include: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to: stroke (abnormal condition in which hemorrhage or blockage of the blood vessels of the brain leads to oxygen lack and resulting symptoms - sudden loss of ability to move a body part [as an arm or parts of the face], or to speak, paralysis weakness or if severe, death) (1), hemiplegia (paralysis affecting only one side of the body (2), Bipolar Disorder (a mental disorder characterized by episodes of mania and depression) (3), and chronic pain syndrome. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/5/2022, coded the resident as scoring a 13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to check the placement and function of the wander guard according to the physician's orders for 1 of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 8. The findings include: Resident # 8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: high blood pressure, low iron and breast cancer. Resident # 8's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/01/2021, coded Resident # 8 as scoring a 0 (zero) on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS), indicating the resident is severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Section P Restraints and Alarms coded Resident # 8 for a wander guard Used daily. The POS (physician's order sheet) for Resident # 8 documented in part, Wanderguard to wheelchair check function & (and) placement every shift. Date Order: 08/06/2021. Start Date: 08/06/2021. The comprehensive care plan for Resident # 8 dated 08/03/2021 documented. FOCUS: [Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a therapeutic diet according to the physician's orders for 1 of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 5. The facility staff failed to provide Resident # 5 with a NAS (No Added Salt) and NCS (no concentrated sugar) diet according to the physician ' s orders. The findings include: Resident # 5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: high blood pressure, heart failure and diabetes mellitus [1]. Resident # 5's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/27/2021, coded Resident # 5 as scoring a four on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, four - being severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The POS (physician's order sheet) for Resident # 5 documented in part, Accu checks [2] at bed time related to TYPE 2 (two) DIABETES MELLITUS WITH DIABETIC NEUROPATHY [3]. Date Order: 02/18/2021. Start Date: 02/18/2021.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a complete pain management program for one of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #51. The facility staff failed to document the location of pain and failed to off non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of pain medication. The findings include: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to: stroke (abnormal condition in which hemorrhage or blockage of the blood vessels of the brain leads to oxygen lack and resulting symptoms - sudden loss of ability to move a body part [as an arm or parts of the face], or to speak, paralysis weakness or if severe, death) (1), hemiplegia (paralysis affecting only one side of the body) (2), Bipolar Disorder (a mental disorder characterized by episodes of mania and depression) (3), and chronic pain syndrome. The most recent MDS (minimum data set)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure one of 31 residents in the survey sample was free of unnecessary pain medication, Resident #51. For Resident #51, the facility staff administered pain medication when the documented pain level was outside the parameters of the physician ordered pain medication. The findings include: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to: stroke (abnormal condition in which hemorrhage or blockage of the blood vessels of the brain leads to oxygen lack and resulting symptoms - sudden loss of ability to move a body part [as an arm or parts of the face], or to speak, paralysis weakness or if severe, death) (1), hemiplegia (paralysis affecting only one side of the body) (2), Bipolar Disorder (a mental disorder characterized by episodes of mania and depression) (3), and chronic pain syndrome. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed ensure the drug regimen for three of 40 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 63, # 30 and # 31, were free from unnecessary pain medications. The facility staff failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as needed pain medication, for Resident # 63 and #31 on multiple occasions in August, September and October 2019, and for Resident # 30 on multiple occasions in September 2019. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as needed pain medication, Tylenol [1] for Resident # 63 on multiple occasions in August, September and October 2019. Resident # 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: chronic pain osteoarthritis [2] and high blood pressure. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to serve food and provide catheter care in a manner to promote resident dignity for one of 40 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 175. On 10/17/19, a nursing student was observed standing while feeding Resident #175 her breakfast in bed. The findings include: Resident # 175 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: swallowing difficulties, low iron and high blood pressure. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 175's was not due at the time of the survey. The facility's nursing admission assessment dated [DATE], coded Resident # 175 as Oriented to place times one. Resident # 57 was coded as requiring the assistance of one staff member for eating. The facility's baseline care plan for Resident # 175 dated 10/11/2019 documented, Cognitive status: Cognitively impaired. Under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the necessary paperwork to the receiving facility for a facility initiated transfer for one of 40 residents, Resident #325. The facility staff failed to provide evidence that all required information was provided to the hospital staff when Resident #325 was transferred to the hospital on 9/5/19. The findings include: Resident #325 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but are not limited to: congestive heart failure [circulatory congestion, retention of fluid in the lungs and edema of extremities. (1)], pleural effusion [accumulation of fluid in the space between the chest wall and the lungs. (2)] and atrial fibrillation [rapid and random contraction of the atria of the heart (3)]. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a 14 day Medicare assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/24/19, coded the resident as scoring a 11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed implement the comprehensive care plan for two of 40 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 63 and # 31. The facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for Resident # 63 and Resident #31 for the use of non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as needed pain medications. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to implement Resident # 63 comprehensive care plan for the use of non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as needed Tylenol [1]. Resident # 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: chronic pain osteoarthritis [2] and high blood pressure. Resident # 63's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/26/19, coded Resident # 63 as scoring a 12 on the brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to review or revise the comprehensive care plan for two of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 41 and # 50. The facility staff failed to revise Resident # 41's comprehensive care plan to reflect the correct use of a seat cushion and not a back brace cushion for the resident, and failed to revise Resident # 50's comprehensive care plan to reflect the use of an indwelling catheter. The findings include: 1. Resident # 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: lower back pain, heart failure and chest pain. Resident # 41's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/04/2019, coded Resident # 41 as scoring an eight on the staff assessment for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, eight - being moderately impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Resident # 41…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of 40 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 27 and 31. The facility staff failed to store Resident # 27's C-PAP [Continuous Positive Airway Pressure] [1] mask in a sanitary manner and failed to administer Resident # 31's oxygen according to the physician's orders. The findings include: 1. Resident # 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and a re-admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: obstructive sleep apnea [1], anxiety [2], and muscle weakness. Resident # 27's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/21/19, coded Resident # 27 as scoring a 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15 - being cognitively intact for making daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure physician prescribed medication was obtained and provided for administration as ordered for one of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident #8. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #8's newly prescribed antibiotic medication was provided for administration on 1/2/19 at 9:00 PM as ordered by the physician. The antibiotic was not obtained and administered until 1/3/19 at 9:00 AM. The findings include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of but not limited to Parkinson's disease, dementia, high blood pressure, psychosis, glaucoma, and left arm fracture. The quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 7/24/19 coded the resident as being severely impaired in ability to make daily life decisions. A review of the clinical record revealed a social worker note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to dispose of biologicals upon expiration date in one of two nourishment rooms. The facility staff failed to dispose of biologicals upon expiration date. Three bottles of expired tube feeding formula were observed available for resident use in the Dogwood/Willow nourishment room. The findings include: On [DATE] at 8:00 AM an inspection of nourishment rooms was conducted. Three bottles of expired tube feeding formula were found in one nourishment room, 1000 milliliter bottle of Osmolite expired [DATE], 1000 milliliter bottle of Jevity expired [DATE] and 500 milliliter bottle of Vital expired [DATE]. An interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2, on [DATE] at 8:00 AM. LPN #2 stated, I was checking the tube feedings this morning and found they were expired, but I couldn't reach them to throw them out. All three bottles of expired tube feedings were located on the third shelf. When asked about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to implement infection control practices to prevent the development and transmission of infections for one of 40 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 27. The facility staff failed to implement infection control practices for the storage of Resident # 27's C-PAP mask [Continuous Positive Airway Pressure] [1] when it was not in use. The findings include: Resident # 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and a re-admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: obstructive sleep apnea [1], anxiety [2], and muscle weakness. Resident # 27's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/21/19, coded Resident # 27 as scoring a 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15 - being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Review of the annual MDS with an ARD of 02/26/19 coded Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GREEN TREE HEALTH MANAGEMENT — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FAUQUIER OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
3539 FILLMORE IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
ADS CAPITAL TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
ADS FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
B AND S FUNDING LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
HG DANZ LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
JJ FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2026
MINDY STERN IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
MSB TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
NHIG LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
SENIOR HEALTHCARE ADVOCACY AND CONSULTING LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
SJ FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
SJ HEALTHCARE CAPITAL LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
CLARE, CHRISTOPHERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
CZERMEK, MICHAELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
EHRENTREU, MARKIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
HEIFETZ, JACOBIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
MILLER, JACOBIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
SCHWARTZ, YISROELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
STERN, DANIELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
STERN, DOVIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
STERN, FREDERICKIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
STERN, JOSEPHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
STERN, MENACHEMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
STERN, MICHAELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
STERN, SHIMONIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
STERN, SIMONIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/01/2024
STERN, YEHUDAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
BURTON, NOAHIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
GREENWALD, BRIANIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
WEISS, HILLELIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
STERN, AHARONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2024
GANNON, AMANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
STERN, SHIFRAIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
PC8 CAPITAL GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
BEHIRI, AMRIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 48 rows in the source record cover these 36 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-39.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$138K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 7%Other / private 6%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $138K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$451per resident / day
operating cost
$13,699per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$324per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495233. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-08-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next