Paradigm at Katy
1480 Katy Flewellen, Katy, TX 77494 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 125 certified beds · (281) 394-0088 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $241,445 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-25)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (91%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.9% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.9% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.2% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.8% | 98.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.6% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.3% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.9% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 48.4% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.6% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.7% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.53 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.41 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 152 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.5%CMS range 36.4–61.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.3%CMS range 9.8–17.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.9–9.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.19 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 81.5 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.41 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.52 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 1.02 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 91% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 13 of 28 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, # 10, #11 #12, #13, and #14) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #6, #7 #8, #9, # 10, #11, #12, #13, #14) did not acquire Candida auris (Candida auris is a fungal infection that can cause serious illness) infection at the facility. The facility failed to ensure staff (CNA B and LVN M) wash or sanitize hands after providing care to Residents (Resident #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7) rooms. The facility failed to ensure that staff (CNA B and LVN M) implemented appropriate use of PPE and transmission-based precautions prior to enter and exiting residents' (Resident #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7) rooms. The facility failed to ensure that staff (CNA B) clean and disinfect equipment (pulse ox and thermometer) used to obtain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside and toilet and bathing facilities for 4 of 4 halls (100 Hall, 200 Hall, 300 Hall, and 400 Hall) reviewed for call light systems. 1. The facility failed to repair or replace the call light system for the entire building after five months when inclement weather caused the system to fail on 05/02/2024 through 10/09/2024. Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4, who were all physically and cognitively capable of using a call light system had no means to call for staff assistance. 2. The facility failed to have adequate interventions in place for CR #1, who was alert, oriented, and quadriplegic (a condition that causes a person to lose the ability to move all four limbs and the body from the neck down), to call for staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's choices for 2 of 2 residents (CR#1 and CR#2) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure emergency medical treatment was provided in a timely manner to CR #1, after he missed 3 to 4 days of dialysis, his doctor gave orders for hospital evaluation and treatment, and the Dialysis Nurse expressed concerns of fluid overload. 2. The facility failed to ensure emergency medical treatment was provided in a timely manner to CR#2, after his doctor gave orders for a blood transfusion, which was an emergency situation. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on [DATE]. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with a potential for more than minimal harm, due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with the professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of four residents (CR # 1) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure CR # 1 received hemodialysis treatments as ordered by his physician. CR # 1 exhibited symptoms of fluid overload and required emergency medical care. In addition, Resident #1's dialysis access port malfunctioned, and Resident # 1 did not receive dialysis for 4 days.CR # 2 missed dialysys treatments on [DATE] and [DATE]. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on [DATE] at 2:50 pm. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 11:41 am, the facility remained out of compliance at scope of isolated with the potential of more than minimal harm due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-01-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician; and notify the resident representative for 1 of 3 residents (CR #1) reviewed for change of condition, in that, The facility staff failed to immediately notify the physician when CR#1 started vomiting up a brown substance repeatedly on [DATE]. The facility failed to notify the physician that CR #1 insulin NPH was discontinued when CR#1 was having high glucose readings for 6 days. CR#1 was sent out to the hospital on [DATE] and died in the hospital on [DATE]. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on [DATE] while the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 3:58pm, the facility remained out of compliance due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place. These failures could expose residents to low quality of care, worsening of condition, hospitalization, and death. Findings included: Record review of CR#1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (CR #1) out of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care in that: The facility failed to recognize a change in condition for CR#1 when she began throwing up on [DATE] and some days after, and continuously having extremely high blood glucose levels for 6 days ([DATE] - [DATE]). CR#1 was sent out to the hospital on [DATE] and died in the hospital on [DATE]. The facility delayed in sending CR#1 to the hospital by calling the non-emergency line taking the ambulance over an hour to come when CR#1 was nonresponsive, blood sugar was 598, and O2 Saturation was 88% while on nonrebreather mask with 10 liters oxygen on [DATE]. The facility failed to monitor blood glucose levels adequately when CR#1's blood glucose level continued to spike with numbers above 600. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care on accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 10 residents (CR #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure the night shift staff (10:00 p.m. - 6:00 a.m.) recognized and provided clinical interventions when CR #1 experienced a change of condition (shortness of breath, fever of 103.5 degrees Fahrenheit, tachycardia (134 BPM) (when the heart beats faster than normal, usually more than 100 beats per minute while resting), and diaphoresis (sweating profusely), with an oxygen saturation (the percentage of oxygen-saturated hemoglobin in the blood) of 89% (normal range is between 95% and 100 %) on 09/10/2024 after family members attempted to report his concerns by calling the facility approximately 45 times between 1:53 a.m. and 3:47 a.m. This resulted in a delay in CR #1 receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for 1 of 1 call light systems reviewed for resident call system in that: The facility failed to provide a reliable and effective nurse call system and timely staff response.This failure could result in delayed staff response and placed residents at risk of respiratory compromise and injury related to delayed call light response. Interviews on 12/13/2025 at varies time between 1:00PM - 3:00PM with direct care staff (CNA D, Staff J, Nurse A, RT A) stated that the facility nurse call system does not provide audible alerts which could be heard and relied on staff visually monitoring hallway lights. Staff stated that if they were in resident rooms or other areas, they might not see the activated call lights promptly. Staff stated that the residents and staff had previously complained about the call light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment which included injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property in accordance with state law through established procedures and the facility failed to report the results of all the investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with the state law which included to the survey agency within 5 working days of the incident and if the alleged violation was verified appropriate corrective action must be taken for 1 of 4 residents (CR #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. -The facility failed to report results of a self-reported incident when CR #1 had a fall with injury and was sent to the hospital on [DATE].This failure could place residents involved in abuse incidents at risk of continued abuse, further injury, pain, and physical and emotional distress. Record review of CR#1's face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Hallway A) of four hallways observed for infection control. -CNA K left her hooded jacket and eyeglass case of the clean linen cart in Hallway A.This failure could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection. During an observation and interview with RN C of a clean linen cart on Hallway A on 11/19/2025 at 12;19pm, there was an eyeglass case laying directly on top of a black zip-up jacket which was laying on top of the green mesh covering of the clean linen cart. The wheeled cart contained folded linen sheets and briefs inside the mesh cover. RN C said those items should not have been there and that it was an infection control issue. Interview with CNA B on 11/19/2025 at 1:55pm, she said she was one of the CNAs working on Hallway A but was not the person who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #33and Resident #56, and Resident #15) reviewed for ADLs. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #33, and Resident #56 were provided incontinent care in a timely manner by facility staff. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #15 was provided personal grooming (cut resident long classified toenails) by facility staff. These failures placed residents a risk for skin break down, offensive odors, and decrease in quality of life. Findings included: Resident #33 Record review of Resident #33's face sheet dated 04/30/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male was admitted the facility on 10/24/24. Resident #33 diagnosis included: dependence on respirator (ventilator: a device for maintaining artificial respiration), hypertension (force of blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide, based on the preferences of each resident, activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 5 of 5 confidential residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide activities to meet the residents' interests on Saturdays and Sundays for 5 confidential residents. These failures placed residents at risk for decline in quality of life, social and mental psychosocial wellbeing. Findings Include: Observation on Sunday, 04/27/2025 from 01:00 p.m. to 06:00 p.m. revealed there were no activities visible provided for residents in the activity area. Later observation on 04/28/2025 from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. revealed there were no activities visible provided for residents in the activity area. Interview on 04/27/2025 at 02:38 p.m. with the Activity Director, she said that she would arrange Resident Council tomorrow 04/48/2025 at 10:30 a.m. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 (Resident #19) of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights. - The facility failed to place Resident #19's foley catheter bag inside of a privacy bag. This failure could affect the residents who require assistance with their ADLs from facility staff by placing them at risk for social isolation, loss of dignity, and self-worth. The findings include: Record of Resident #19's Facesheet dated 04/30/2025 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to functional quadriplegia (complete inability to move due to sever disability or medical condition), benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate (male gland below the bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #34) reviewed. -The facility failed to ensure that Resident #34's status of oxygen was a focus area in the resident's comprehensive care plan and no intervention was in place. This deficient practice could affect residents by contributing to inadequate care. The findings included: Resident #34 Record review of Resident #34's facility admission record dated 4/28/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis (sepsis is a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's immune system overreacts to an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 6 (Resident #13) resident rooms observed for accident hazards. -Resident #13's room had two bottles of hair products on their dresser not stored in a safe manner on 4/27/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of injury due to unnecessary access to potentially harmful substances. Findings included: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet captured 04/27/2025, she was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her medical diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar), Dementia, Dysphagia, Traumatic Subdural hemorrhage with loss of Consciousness of Unspecified Duration (brain bleed) and Tracheostomy. Record review of Resident #13's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed, she did not have a BIMS completed and did not have a mood interview done due to her being rarely or never understood. She was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #56) reviewed for incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure CNA V properly cleaned Resident #56 during incontinent care when CNA V did not separate Resident #56's labia on 04/27/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #56's face sheet dated 04/30/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #56 diagnosis included: malignant neoplasm of colon (cancerous growth in the colon), hypertension (force of blood against the walls of the arteries is consistently too high), atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) and cognitive communication deficit (someone has difficulty communicating because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 (Resident #11) of 7 residents reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to follow physician orders for Resident #11 enteral feeding tube to be administer 55ml (milliliters) high-protein tube-feeding formula 1.5 calories (cal) every hour (hr). This failure could place residents who had gastrostomy tube at risk for fluid overload. Findings included: Record of Resident #11's Facesheet dated 05/05/2025 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to acute and chronic respiratory failure (lungs are unable to adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide), moderate protein- calorie malnutrition (deficiency in both protein and calories, leading to a weight loss or a lack of weight gain),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #71) reviewed for pharmacy services. -Resident #71 had Ipratropium .02% solution with 22 plastic vials (respiratory treatment), Ipratropium .02% nebulizer solution with 15 plastic vials, and Budesonide inhalation (respiratory treatment for Crohn's and asthma) suspension of .5mg/ml in medication cart A, even though Resident #71 had discharged from the facility. The failure of not disposing of discharged residents' medications could potentially cause a decline in their health condition and further injury if they were accidentally administered another resident's medication. Findings included: Observation on 5/1/2025 at 11:49 am of LVN G on Cart A, revealed Resident #71 had medications labelled Ipratropium .02% solution with 22 plastic vials, Ipratropium .02% nebulizer solution with 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 2 carts (Cart B) reviewed for medication labelling. - LVN V's cart (cart B) had one undated Lidocaine vial (used to treat pain) with injection marks in the seal. These failures could cause medications to be given past their expiration date, potentially leading to ineffective therapeutic effect. Findings included: Observation of LVN V's medication cart B on 5/1/25 at 11:27am, revealed there was one bottle labelled Lidocaine Hydrochloride injection 88 1/0 with injection marks on the seal with no date on it. In an interview with LVN V on 5/1/2025 at 11:27am, she said if she had opened and used the Lidocaine vial she would have taken it out from the cardboard box, and written the date on the side before using it. She was not the person who opened it. In an interview on 5/1/2025 at 11:34pm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 1 facility dumpsters observed for proper garbage disposal -Dumpster A's side door was observed open with trash inside on 4/27/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of contact with pests and associated diseases. Findings included: Observation on 4/27/2025 at 1:04pm, revealed the left-side sliding door Dumpster A was open. The dumpster appeared half-full of trash inside. In an interview on 4/27/2025 at 1:04pm with the DS, she saw the side door was open and slid it closed. She said it should have been closed. She said all the departments used that dumpster. If it was left open, animals and pests could get into it. In an interview on 4/27/2025 at 3:04pm with the DM, she said the dumpster should not be left open. A potential risk to the facility and residents from leaving the dumpster door open would be in attracting rodents from overflow, or people can get in it. In an interview on 4/28/2025 at 4:10pm with the HK Supervisor, she said housekeeping staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #19 and Resident #13) of 14 residents reviewed for infection control. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 foley catheter tubing was off the floor. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's floor mat was free from his foley catheter tubing. - - Resident #13's room had two bottles of hair products with other resident's names on them on the dresser on [DATE]. These failures placed residents, staff and visitors at risk for cross contamination, unwanted infections, and decease in quality of life. Findings: Resident #19: Record of Resident #19's Facesheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to functional quadriplegia (complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 (Resient #1) reviewed for supervision in that: -The facility failed to ensure CNA A did not improperly reposition Resident #1 by pulling his arm on 03/24/25. This failure could place residents at risk of being injured, bruised, or have fractured limbs . Findings Include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure (when the lungs cannot properly exchange gases, causing abnormal levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the blood), end stage renal disease (a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids), tracheostomy (a surgical procedure where an opening is created in the neck to allow air to enter), essential hypertension (a chronic disease that cause abnormal high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality care for 1 of 10 residents (CR #1) reviewed for comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for CR #1 that addressed his communication status/needs, tracheostomy/ventilator status/needs, and his nighttime anxiety. This failure placed newly admitted residents at risk of not receiving the care and services specific to their needs. Findings include: Record review of CR #1's face sheet dated 09/10/2024 revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. CR #1 was diagnosed with non-pressure chronic ulcer (a non-healing wound) of the skin, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of all r esidents reviewed. -The Administrator failed to ensure the staff had gloves readily available to staff to provide care for the residents. This failure could cause residents not to receive care or delay of care resulting in an increase in infections and hygiene concerns . Findings include: In an interview on 7/19/24 at 10:00 a.m., the Central Supply Supervisor stated she ordered supplies every Monday and Wednesday. She stated she started working at the facility 4 months ago in March 2024 and the supply closets were full. She stated she was not having any problems with contracts for PPE. The Central Supply Supervisor stated she had a contract with Company C and she had no problems with her contracts with them. She stated she ordered supplies on Mondays and received supplies on Tuesdays. She stated for the storm they got notified that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and reported the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation was verified appropriate corrective action was taken for 6 of 6 Residents (Resident #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12) reviewed for allegations involving abuse, physical environment, and infection control. 1. The facility failed to complete a Provider Investigation Report for 3 of 3 intakes involving Resident #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12. These failures could place residents at risk for abuse, injury, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Record review of the facility Provider Investigation Reports reflected the facility did not have a PIR for Intake #493566, #503304 and #503492. Record review of TULIP (Texas Unified License Information Portal) system on 5/21/24 reflected the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheotomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the 'residents' goals and preferences for one of two residents (Resident #1) reviewed for tracheotomy care. 1. The facility failed to ensure sterile technique when Resident #1 changed her inner cannula on 05/15/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's MD was notified Resident #1 changed her inner cannula on 05/15/24, per facility policy. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infections, hospitalizations, and a decline in overall quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/23/24, reflected a female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (not enough oxygen in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 3 call light systems (call light #2) reviewed in 1 of 2 shower rooms reviewed. The facility failed to ensure that call light #2 in shower room [ROOM NUMBER] was maintained in safe operating condition. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving emergency care in a timely manner and at risk for fire emergencies. Findings include: The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/25/2024 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure (difficulty breathing), polyneuropathy (nerve damage causing sensory malfunction), restless legs syndrome (irresistible urge to move legs), muscle weakness, encounter for attention to tracheostomy (procedure to assist with air reaching lungs through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or a centralized staff work area for 1 of 3 call light systems (call light #2) in 1 of 3 (shower stall #2) in 1 of 2 shower rooms (shower room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure shower stall #2's emergency call light system in shower room [ROOM NUMBER] had a cord enabling it to be reachable from the floor. The facility failed to ensure that call light #2 in shower room [ROOM NUMBER] was maintained in safe operating condition. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, pain, hospitalization, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/25/2024 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for one of four resident halls (200-Hall) reviewed for resident call systems. The facility failed to ensure that the rooms on the 200-Hall had working call lights in the restrooms. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to have their needs met and call for staff assistance when they needed it. Findings included: Observation on 4/6/2024 at 9:35 AM of the call light in the restroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that when the call light notification cord was pulled, the light on the exterior of the room did not activate. The restroom did have a bell attached to the call light pull cord. Observation on 4/6/2024 at 9:38 AM of the call light in the restroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that when the call light notification cord was pulled, the light on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are incontinent of urine received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 3 out of 3 residents (Resident #266, Resident #80 and Resident #92) reviewed for Foley catheter care. - The facility failed to ensure Resident # 266's foley catheter bag and privacy bag were not touching the floor while Resident #266 was in bed. - CNA B did not separate Resident #80's labia to clean during incontinent care, clean around the buttocks and did not perform appropriate hand hygiene with glove changes throughout the care. - C.NA E did separate Resident #92's labia to clean and clean the indwelling catheter from insertion site during catheter care in a circular motion and she did not clean the buttocks This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices and decreased quality of life. 1. Record review of Resident #226's face sheet dated 03/13/24 revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 4 medication carts (200 hall medication aide cart, and 400 hall nurse cart) reviewed for medication storage. - The 200-hall medication aide's cart contained the following discontinued medications: Centrum Silver Woman 50 plus, Calcium 200mg, PreserVision AREDS 2, and Garlique 60 capsules. -The 400-hall nurse's cart contained an insulin Lispro injection pen100 units/ML((U - 100)3ml prefilled pen that was not stored in its original packet and did not include the pharmacy label or administration instructions. These failures could place residents at risk of adverse medication reactions. Findings included: During observation on [DATE] at 4:00 p.m., for 200 hall medication aide cart check with MA F…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #47) reviewed for ADLs. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47 was provided personal grooming (fingernail care) by facility staff. This failure could place residents at risk for discomfort, and dignity issues. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #47's face sheet dated 03/14/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility initially on 06/16/23 and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #47 had diagnoses which included: diabetes mellitus (the body does not control the amount of glucose in the blood), pleural effusion (fluid collection between the thin layers of the lung and the wall of the chest cavity), and tracheostomy (a hole that a surgeons make through the front of the neck and into the windpipe) Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0680 — isolatedEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who was licensed or registered by the state for 1 of 1 Activity Director (AD) reviewed, in that: The facility failed to have a qualified AD to serve as the director of the activities program. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life due to lack of activities that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident. The findings included: Observation on 03/12/2024 at 09:20 a.m., Activities Aide (AA A) entered rooms on the 200 hall encouraging residents to come to the dining room for coffee. During an interview with the AA A on 03/12/2024 at 01:53 p.m., AA A stated she had only worked at the facility for just over a week. She stated she had been an AA A for an assistant living facility (ALF). She stated she was unsure if she wanted to obtain an AD certification as this was her first…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent a decline in range of motion for 1 (Resident #80) of 3 residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #80 had interventions in place for her right- hand contracture (A permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen and a decrease in ROM ( Range of motion) to prevent further decline of the range of motion in her right hand. This deficient practice placed residents with contractures at risk for decrease in mobility, range of motion, and could contribute to worsening of contractures. Findings Include: Review of Resident #80's face sheet dated 03/03/2024, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: anoxic brain damage ( caused by a complete lack of oxygen to the brain), personal history of pulmonary embolism (A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 1 activities room reviewed for accident hazards, in that: The facility failed to prevent a long neck lighter from being found in 1 of 1 activities room. These deficient practices could result in residents coming into contact with dangerous materials which could place them at risk of injury or death. The findings were: Observation on 03/14/2024 at 08:01 a.m., revealed a long neck lighter on 1 of 3 bookshelves in the activities room sitting among games, puzzles, books, and crafts. During an interview with the AA A on 03/12/2024 at 01:53 p.m., AA A stated usually about 8 - 10 residents met in the activities room for resident council meeting, and they had met without staff present. During a confidential group meeting on 03/13/2024 at 02:49 p.m., residents indicated that they met monthly for resident council meetings in the activities room. They stated sometimes they met without staff present. They stated that the activities room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 16% based on 4 errors out of 25 opportunities, which involved 3 of 8 residents (Resident #20, Resident #16 and Resident #269) reviewed for medication errors. 1-RN A left a substantial amount of acetaminophen/codeine 300mg/30mg and Sucralfate 1 gm on the portion cup after medication was administrated through g tube to Resident #20. 2-LVN C administered stool softener instead of Senna Syrup 8.8mg/5ml give 10 ml, to Resident # 16. 3-LVN D administered Prednisolone acetate drop, suspension 1%, to both eyes instead of one drop to the right eye to Resident #269 This failure could place residents at risk for increased negative side effects, and a decline in health. Findings included: 1 Record review of Resident #20's face sheet dated 03/14/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #16, Resident #92 and Resident #107) observed for infection control. - RN B failed to clean around Resident #92's draining wound bed during sacral wound treatment. - Respiratory Therapy (RT) entered 2 isolation rooms without donning PPE. Resident #16 and Resident #107 This failure could place the residents at risk for infection. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's face sheet dated 03/01/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: anoxic brain damage ( caused by a complete lack of oxygen to the brain), seizure (sudden, uncontrolled body movements and changes in behavior that occur because of abnormal electrical activity in the brain), contact isolation due to carbapenem resistant and Serratia marcescen ( multidrug-resistant organisms- start…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 2 entrance door to the facility by the laundry) The facility failed to ensure that stored 26 soiled biohazard boxes, syringes, insulin syringes, lancets, GTube formula bag outside by laundry services were not accessible to all staffs and visitors. Findings Included: During an observation on 03/13/2024 at 3:01 PM with Infection Preventionist (IP) the following observations were made: Observation outside the laundry room revealed 26 large biohazard boxes and an open trolley with the following items - A Diclofenac sodium topical Gel 1 tube - 2 Insulin syringes- - Open box of 60 mls Syringes - Lancets used to check blood sugar in the box - Novofine Auto cover 30 gm gauze in the box 100 needles - 60 mls (AMSure piston irrigation syringe) open box Lot number ( 2028-10-12) e - 5 GTube pump Ensure formula with flush bag1000ml Interview with IP on 3/13/24 at 4:30 PM she said she did not know who kept the boxes and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that include procedures to ensure accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs for 1 of 3 residents (CR #1) reviewed for medications. The facility failed to follow Physician's order to only discontinue insulin Lispro for CR #1, but facility discontinued all insulin (NPH and Lispro), leaving CR #1 with no insulin to administer for CR #1 while CR #1 was having high blood sugar for multiple days. The facility failed to notify the physician that CR #1 insulin NPH was discontinued when CR#1 was having high glucose readings for 6 days. CR#1 was sent out to the hospital on [DATE] and died in the hospital on [DATE]. These failures could place the residents in the facility at risk for not receiving needed medications to maintain optimum health, resulting in deterioration in their condition. Findings included: Record review of CR#1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female initially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-01 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) was electronically completed and transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for 5 of 22 residents reviewed for MDS transmittal. The facility failed to transmit quarterly MDS assessments for Residents #51, #85, and #72 within 14 days of completion. The facility failed to transmit annual MDS assessments for Residents #65 and #21 within 14 days of completion. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their assessments transmitted timely. Findings included: 1. Record review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 was a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 4/20/22. Her diagnoses included stroke (occurs when the supply of blood to the brain is reduced or blocked which prevents the brain tissue from receiving oxygen or nutrients); hypertension (high blood pressure), aphasia (difficulty communicating), hemiplegia or hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis of one side of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted profession principles and assure that medications were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for use of insulin. (Resident #171) The facility failed to ensure 4 insulin pins were safely stored (Rx #'s 6361303, 6378274, 6376764, and 6377867). This failure could place residents at risk of ingestion of medications and/or risk of not receiving their prescribed medications. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated 02/01/2023 indicated Resident #171 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of respiratory failure, stroke, dependence on a ventilator, and loss of voice. Record review of the consolidated physician's orders dated 02/01/2023 indicated Resident #171 had Lantus Solo-star Solution Pen-injector 110 units per milliliter inject 12 units…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 20 residents reviewed received reasonable accommodation of needs. (Resident #48) The facility failed to ensure Resident # 48 had a functioning call light. This failure could place residents at risk of injury that could lead to possible falls, major injuries, hospitalization, andfalls and unmet needs. Findings include: Record review of an undated face sheet indicated Resident #48 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle weakness, lack of coordination, dysphagia, aphonia, cognitive communication deficit, obesity, heart failure, and pain. Record review of the most recent quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #48 was understood and understood others. The MDS revealed Resident #48's BIMs (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was a 06 indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #48 required supervision with bed mobility, transfers, walking, dressing, eating,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a private space for residents' monthly council meetings for 7 of 7 confidential residents reviewed for resident council. The facility did not provide a private space for resident council meeting. This failure could place residents, who attended resident council meetings, at risk of not being able to voice concerns due to a lack of privacy. Findings included: During a confidential group interview and observation on 01/31/2023 at 10:56 a.m. held in the dining room, seven residents stated the resident council meeting was held in the dining room most of the time. The residents stated they do not have a private room since some of them have ventilators and extra equipment were needed. One resident said medications were brought to them, vital signs were taken and at times blood draws were obtained during the meeting. The residents stated they would like a more private area with no care interruptions, unless necessary, for more privacy and the ability to hear one another. During the meeting surveyor observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to secure residents privacy and deliver mail unopened for 3 of 7 confidential residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure residents mail was delivered unopened. This failure could affect all the residents by placing them at risk of a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life. Findings included: During a confidential group interview on 01/31/2023 at 10:56 a.m., three of seven confidential residents said they sometimes received their mail opened. They said the mail that was usually opened were the ones containing a check, social security, Medicaid/Medicare information and bank statements. They said they would like to be able to open the mail themselves and if it was something that needed to be provided to the facility then they could provide it. During an interview on 01/31/2023 at 11:51 a.m., the Activity director said the mail was received by the receptionist. The Activity director said the mail was sometimes mistakenly opened by the receptionist thinking it was a check or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS was completed for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #120) reviewed for discharge MDS accuracy. The facility failed to accurately document #120's discharge. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving needed care and services. Findings included: Record review of a nursing progress note dated 12/04/2022 indicated Resident #120 discharged home with his family at 4:40 p.m. The family requested a preferred home health to be set up by the social worker. Resident #120 was discharged with his belongings. Record review of a Discharge MDS dated [DATE] indicated in Section A2100 indicated Resident #120 discharged to an acute hospital. During an interview on 02/01/2023 at 11:43a.m., RN D indicated she was responsible for the accuracy of the MDS. RN D said the MDS inaccuracy could affect Resident #120 receiving needed community services. During an interview on 02/01/2022 at 2:06 p.m., the Administrator said he expected the MDS to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 22 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #72 and Resident #103). The facility failed to provide oxygen concentrator filters for Resident #72. The facility did not ensure Resident #103's oxygen concentrator filter was free from gray like substances. These failures could place residents who required respiratory care at risk for respiratory infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #72's face sheet dated 02/01/23 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included sepsis (life-threatening complication of an infection), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that block airflow and makes it difficult to breathe), essential hypertension (force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), and hemiplegia and hemiparesis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, dispensing, receiving, and administering medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services (Resident #60). The facility failed to order Gentamicin 80mg IV for a urinary tract infection which resulted in Resident #60 missing 3 doses of a prescribed medications. This failure could place residents at risk for worsening health concerns. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet indicated Resident #60 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The face sheet indicated the resident had diagnoses of dependence of renal dialysis (when one has been depending on a dialysis machine for several months. During dialysis, the blood is detoxified, and excess water removed), dependence of a ventilator (ventilator dependence was defined as the failure to wean the patient from the ventilator while hospitalized in the intensive care unit or respiratory care center, in conjunction with continued use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of 1 of 22 residents reviewed for laboratory services. (Resident #2) The facility failed to obtain valproic acid level (level must stay within a specific range for seizure medication to work properly) as ordered for Resident #2. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their medications at a therapeutic level, delays in treatment, and/or deterioration in condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 02/01/23, indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of seizures, anxiety, dementia with behavioral disturbance (memory loss with behaviors), and major depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood). Record review of Resident #2's quarterly assessment, dated 11/03/22, indicated he was usually understood and usually understood others. The MDS revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for infection control. (Resident #63) The facility failed to ensure CNA G and CNA H performed hand hygiene after changing gloves while providing incontinent care to Resident #63. This failure could place residents at risk for infection due to improper care practices. Findings included: Record review of Resident #63's face sheet, dated 02/01/23, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), heart failure (condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), anemia (lack of healthy red blood cells), and acute and chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-03-15 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess each resident annual assessment using the MDS form specified by the state and approved by CMS for 1 of 10 residents (Resident 52) reviewed for annual assessments. Resident #52's Annual MDS Assessment was not completed within 96 days of the previous MDS assessment. This failure could place all residents at-risk of not having their assessments completed timely. The findings included: Record review of Resident #52's Face Sheet dated 03/14/2024 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anoxic brain damage (restricted blood flow to the brain), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low blood oxygen), aphasia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), unspecified, encounter for attention to gastrostomy (feeding tube), other seizures, other muscle spasm, and encounter for attention to tracheostomy (procedure to open airways). Record review of Resident #52's Annual MDS with and ARD of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-03-15 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a resident assessment frequently than once every 3 months for 10 of 19 residents (Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #34, Resident #46, Resident #63, Resident #85, Resident #86, Resident #87, Resident #93, and Resident #96) reviewed for resident assessments in that: - Resident #87's Quarterly Minimum Data Set's (MDS) for January of 2024 was not completed until 03/15/2024. - Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #34, Resident #46, Resident #63, Resident #85, Resident #86, Resident #93, and Resident #96's Quarterly MDS' assessment for February of 2024, were not completed until 03/14/2024 and/or 03/15/2024. These failures placed residents at risk of not having their assessments completed timely which could result in not having their individually assessed needs met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #14's Face Sheet dated 03/14/2024 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$241,445 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $70,800 — penalty dated 2026-05-25
- $34,426 — penalty dated 2025-02-18
- $50,449 — penalty dated 2024-11-19
- $14,701 — penalty dated 2024-03-15
- $71,069 — penalty dated 2024-01-31
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-19 for 12 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-15 for 6 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PARADIGM HEALTHCARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAKBEND MEDICAL CENTER | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 02/01/2025 |
| CRAYTON, TOM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| DORMAN, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| FREUDENBERGER, JOSEPH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| HALEY, JEFF | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| HUGHES, RUSTON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| KING, ABBY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| KING, ELIZABETH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| PISANI, ADAM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| POPATIA, AMIRALI | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| STUART, JULIUS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| UTHMAN, EDWARD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| KATY NURSING & REHABILITATION LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| ZEPHYR NH, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| POLSTEIN, MOSHE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| SHKOP, AHARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| LEV 1 PACK HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2025 |
| ZOS CHANUKAH ATIED FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2025 |
| ZOS CHANUKAH LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2025 |
| R, JOSE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $665K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676064. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.