No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Paradigm at the Oak

507 West Ave, Schulenburg, TX 78956 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (979) 743-4150 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse3 immediate-jeopardy citations4 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$103,606 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 4 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $103,606 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-20)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
605 Upton Ave · (979) 743-3520 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
104 N Kessler Ave · (979) 743-7100 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1225 Summit St · (979) 743-2160 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(979) 743-4126 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.1%15.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.1%3.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.1%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.5%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.8%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%3.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.1%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.6%9.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication12.8%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.3%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.5%12.3%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.962.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.782.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
41.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.02U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Met the expected recovery: 41.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.02 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 7.2–17.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge41.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge25.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.1–15.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
39.0%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 52.2 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-02)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had the right to be free from abuse when on 02/07/2026 at approximately 10:00 AM LVN A told Resident #1 to sit right or he was going to fall back, and he would get blood all over the floor and LVN A would have to pick it up. LVN A pushed Resident #1's head forward in the dining room which humiliated him, and LVN A continued to be Resident #1's nurse after the incident and a the day after the incident. The noncompliance was identified as Past Noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 02/07/2026 and ended on 02/11/2026. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place the residents in the facility at risk for abuse and neglect. Finding included: Record review of Resident #1's face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to remove LVN A from duty and she continued to work with Resident #1 after witnessed abuse was reported to the administrator. The noncompliance was identified as Past Noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 02/07/2026 and ended on 02/11/2026. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place the residents in the facility at risk for physical, mental, and/or psychosocial harm and lack of timely reporting of incidents.Finding included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/19/2026, revealed a fifty-one-year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. His admitting diagnoses included bipolar disorder, current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-02-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all allegations of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated and documented for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to have evidence that a thorough investigation was conducted following the allegation that on 02/07/2026 LVN A spoke tapped Resident #1 in the back of the head. The noncompliance was identified as Past Noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 02/07/2026 and ended on 02/11/2026. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect by not investigating injuries of unknown origin.Finding included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/19/2026, revealed a fifty-one-year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. His admitting diagnoses included bipolar disorder, current episode hypomanic (a distinct period…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received adequate supervision to prevent him from exiting the facility undetected on 12/09/24 and 12/31/24. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 12/09/24 and ended on 01/01/25. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began on 01/08/25. The Past Non-Compliance form (a document used to report a past violation that has been rectified, at the time of the current investigation) sent to Administrator on 01/17/25 at 3:20pm. This failure could place the residents with exit seeking behaviors at risk for injury or death. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect Resident #1's right to be free of sexual abuse by Resident #2. The facility failed to keep Resident #1 from being sexual assaulted by Resident #2 on 11/02/24. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 11/05/24 at 3:47 PM and an IJ template was given. While the IJ was removed on 11/07/24 at 3:21 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a level 2 of no actual harm at a scope of isolated that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of abuse, injury, and psychosocial harm. Findings included: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's undated care plan reflected a [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, cognitive communication deficit, depressive episodes, anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness and atrophy (wasting away). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures regarding prohibiting and preventing abuse for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of eight residents reviewed for developing and implementing abuse and neglect policies. The facility failed to implement the facility abuse and neglect policy when they failed to protect Resident #1 from being sexually assaulted by Resident #2. The ADM was notified, and she failed to action to keep Resident #1 from further abuse or psychosocial harm. She did not thoroughly investigate the incident or report it to HHSC. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 11/05/24 at 3:47 PM and an IJ template was given. While the IJ was removed on 11/07/24 at 3:21 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a level of no actual harm at a scope of isolated that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This deficient practice could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to maintain the highest practicable well-being of each resident for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of eight residents reviewed for administration. The facility Administrator failed to: - Investigate or report to HHSC an incident where Resident #2 was observed sexually assaulting Resident #1. - Allow LVN A to document the incident between Residents #1 and #2, notify law enforcement, or send Resident #1 to the hospital for evaluation. - Accurately document CNA B's witness statement without altering what she wrote regarding the incident between Residents #1 and #2. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 11/05/24 at 3:47 PM and an IJ template was given. While the IJ was removed on 11/07/24 at 3:21 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a level of no actual harm at a scope of isolated that was not immediate jeopardy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for one (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for a homelike environment. The facility failed to fix a plumbing issue in Resident #3's closet for approximately six months which caused his closet to secrete a musty/moldy odor causing him to be embarrassed and humiliated to wear his clothes which embodied the odor. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for diminished quality of life and being in an unsafe environment. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's undated care plan reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord), depression, and muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting away). Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 15, indicating he had no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities, and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 3 (Residents #1, #2 and #3) of 7 residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide activities for Resident #1 and Resident #2 to meet their psycho-social and mental well-being for the months of April 2026 and from May 1, 2026, through May 27, 2026.The facility failed to provide activities for Resident #3 to meet his psycho-social and mental well-being for the month of April 2026.This failure could place residents at risks of boredom, depression, behavior, diminished quality of life and decreased cognitive function. Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible for one of two housekeeping carts (Housekeeping Cart #1) reviewed for hazards.The facility failed to ensure Housekeeping Cart #1, with chemicals inside the compartments, was locked when unsupervised. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries, illness, and hospitalization. Findings included:During an observation on 05/28/2026 at 10:30 a.m., Housekeeping Cart #1 was located at the end of west hall. The compartment where chemicals were stored was not locked. The compartment had disinfectant cleaner, tub and tile cleaner, and bio waste degrader. Housekeeper A was not on west hall, and no other staff was near the unlocked housekeeping cart. Housekeeper A entered the west hall from near the nurses desk located beside the west hall. He was unable to view Housekeeping Cart #1.During an interview on 05/28/2026 at 10:40 a.m., Housekeeper A stated the housekeeping cart was expected to be locked anytime the housekeeper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to survey were readily available to examine for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for resident rights in that: The required documents were not posted in a location readily accessible and visible to all residents, their legal representatives, or family members as required.This failure placed residents of the facility at risk of knowing past and present citations of the facility, and potentially being negatively affected by an area of citation.An observation conducted throughout facility on 03/31/26 at 1:12 PM revealed the survey results were not posted in the lobby or any common areas of the facility nor a sign indicating where the survey results were posted. An observation conducted throughout facility on 04/01/2026 at 8:15 AM revealed that survey results were not posted in the lobby or any common areas of the facility nor a sign indicating where the survey results were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 19 residents (Resident #56 and Resident #59) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #56 and Resident #59's room temperatures were maintained at comfortable temperatures (between 71 to 81 degrees) on 03/31/2026 when the temperatures were found to be 67 to 68 degrees. These failures could place residents at risk of being cold, living in an uncomfortable environment, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included: Review of Resident #56's face sheet dated 04/02/2026 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses diabetes mellitus (A condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar.), hypertension (High pressure in the arteries (vessels that carry blood from the heart to the rest of the body) and macular degeneration (an eye disease that affects central…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services.1. The facility failed to date food and beverages found within the facility's freezers and refrigerator on 03/31/2026.2. The facility failed to date and properly seal food products in facility's freezers and refrigerator on 03/31/2026.These failures could place the residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of cross contamination, loss of nutritional value, weight loss, and foodborne illness.Findings included:In an observation on 03/31/2026 at 6:49 AM, the facility's three door refrigerator was found to contain three trays of red juice and water that were not covered, labeled or dated. On a shelf was an open, uncovered, and undated can of soda. On two trays, fruit was cut and in bowls that was covered but not labeled or dated. In an observation on 03/31/2026 at 6:52 AM, the facility's three door freezer was found to contain an open undated box, partially opened bag…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of two residents (Resident #7) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure RN F followed standard precautions during wound care for Resident #7's unstageable right heel pressure ulcer on 04/01/2026 when she failed to perform hand hygiene during wound care. This failure placed residents at risk for developing wound infections, and at risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and infection.Findings included: Review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 04/01/2026 reflected at [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility 04/23/2024 with the following diagnoses diabetes mellitus (A condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar.), chronic obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident was treated with respect and dignity for 1 (Resident #26) of 10 residents reviewed for resident rights.1. The facility failed to ensure Maintenance Tech E knocked on Resident #26's door prior to entry and explained the purpose of the visit before performing work in the room on 03/31/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure HSKP G knocked on Resident #26's door prior to entry on 03/31/2026.The deficient practice could place residents at risk of feeling uncomfortable, embarrassment, and a decreased quality of life.Record Review of Resident #26's MDS Assessment, dated 01/19/2026, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE] with a BIMS score of 01, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included Generalized Anxiety Disorder (excessive worry about daily events), Other Paraphilias (intense, recurrent sexual interest that causes distress and impairment), Hyperlipidemia (elevated fat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #38) of five residents reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to ensure Resident #38's call light was within reach on 03/31/2026 and 04/02/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of needs and accommodation being unmet.Record Review of Resident #38's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #38 was a [AGE] year-old male who was last admitted to facility on 02/10/2026 with multiple diagnoses to include Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type(mental health condition combining psychotic symptoms (hallucinations, delusions) with manic and depressive episodes, blindness right and left eye, Type 2 Diabetes(body resist insulin and fail to maintain normal blood sugars), and depression(sadness, loss of interest). MDS also indicated Resident #38 had a BIMS score of 00 indicating severe cognitive function. Review of Resident #38's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I residents with a mental illness was completed correctly and were provided with a PASARR Level II assessment for one (Resident #4) of four residents reviewed for resident assessments. Resident #4's PASARR Level l was not updated to reflect his new diagnoses of PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) on 07/09/2025 after he was admitted on [DATE]. This failure could place residents who had a mental illness and/or intellectual or development disabilities at risk for not receiving the appropriate care, and services to meet their needs.Findings included: Review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 04/01/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses diabetes mellitus (A condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar.), atherosclerotic heart disease (A condition where the arteries become narrowed and hardened due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1wing (1Upstairs wing) of 2 facility wings observed for environment. The facility failed to ensure the upstairs restrooms and shower rooms had hot water readily available. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a decreased quality of life. During an observation on 3/4/26 at 11:30 a.m. restroom D revealed that the hot water faucet turned on but no water came out of faucet. During an observation on 3/4/26 at 11:35 a.m. restroom C revealed that the hot water after running for 2 minutes reached temperature of 74.4 degrees Fahrenheit. During an observation on 3/4/26 at 1:00 p.m. staff/visitor restroom F revealed that the hot water after running for 2 minutes reached temperature of 73.6 degrees Fahrenheit. During an observation on 3/4/26 at 1:30 p.m. of restroom/shower room A revealed that the hand sink hot water after running for 2 minutes reached temperature of 78.2 degrees Fahrenheit. Observation of shower hot water after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events caused the allegation involved abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse. The facility failed to report physical and verbal abuse to the State Agency within 2 hours when, on 02/07/2026, it was reported to Administrator by MT A that LVN A made a threat to Resident #1 and tapped Resident #1 in the back of the head. The noncompliance was identified as Past Noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision, to the extent possible for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for safety. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 followed the facility safe smoking policy when on 12/14/2026 and additional unknown dates staff smelled cigarette smoke in Resident #2's room.on 01/31/2026 staff members observed two packages of cigarettes in Resident #2's roomon unknown dates CNAs observed Resident #2 with lighters. These failures could place residents at risk for avoidable accidents and injuries.Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 02/19/2026, revealed a thirty-seven-year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His admitting diagnoses included paraplegia (impairment or loss of motor and sensory function in the lower extremities), anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Record review of Resident #2's MDS (clinical assessment to determine resident's strength and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #1) observed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure LVN A followed standard precautions during wound care on 12/11/2025 for Resident #1's wounds when she failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes. This failure could place residents at risk for healthcare-associated cross-contamination and infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/11/2025 revealed Resident #1 is a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Multiple Myeloma (a rare blood cancer of plasma cells in the bone marrow), Paraplegia (paralysis affecting the lower half of the body), Generalized muscle weakness, Anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was implemented so the facility was free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for pest control observed and four (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #6, and Resident #7) of seven residents reviewed.The facility failed to keep roaches and rodents out of resident rooms, the facility kitchen, facility common areas, and rest rooms.These failures placed residents at risk of infection, feelings of fear, anxiety, disgust, helplessness, shame, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included:Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 09/22/25 reflected a 62-year-male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] disease (a virus that attacks the body's immune system), type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications (a chronic condition in which the body does not use insulin effectively and has not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs for one (Resident #3) of six residents reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to administer Resident #3's Lidocaine Pain Relief External 21 times between 08/08/25 and 09/06/25. This failure could place residents at risk of worsening of their condition, increased risk of falls, pain, and injury.Findings included:Review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 09/11/25, reflected a 36-year-male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia (a condition characterized by the loss of voluntary movement and sensation in both lower limbs, typically resulting from an injury to the spinal cord in the thoracic or lumbar regions), displaced fracture of acromial process, right shoulder, initial encounter for closed fracture (a broken bone (acromion)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to serve foods that were palatable and prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for 1 of 1 kitchen observed and five (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6) of ten residents reviewed.The facility failed to serve warm food to residents.These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, unwanted weight loss, and diminished quality of life. Findings included:Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/22/25, reflected a 62-year-male, admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] disease (a virus that attacks the body's immune system), type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications (a chronic condition in which the body does not use insulin effectively and has not developed any specific complications that can be identified), and bipolar disorder, current episode manic without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for one (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for transfer and discharge rights, in that:The facility failed to:1. provide documentation that Resident #2's guardian received sufficient preparation and orientation when Resident #2 was discharged to a facility not within Resident #2's guardian's jurisdiction2. Provide documentation from Resident #2's psychiatric NP that Resident #2 was a danger to himself or other residents3. Provide documentation that the ombudsman was informed of the discharge4. Provide documentation that Resident #2 received a discharge notice.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs upon discharge.Findings included: Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 09/11/25 reflected a 49-year-male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the residents that meet professional standards of quality care for one (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to create a baseline care plan for how to transfer Resident #3, a paraplegic, within 48hours of his admission. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving goals and interventions for their individual needs for person centered care and safe transfers. Findings included:Review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 09/11/25, reflected a 36-year-male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia (a condition characterized by the loss of voluntary movement and sensation in both lower limbs, typically resulting from an injury to the spinal cord in the thoracic or lumbar regions), displaced fracture of acromial process, right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 of 8 (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) residents reviewed for a homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2's wheelchairs were clean and free of debris. The facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of the upstairs and downstairs dining rooms.The facility failed to clean the floors, leaving a sticky residue.The facility failed to provide toilet paper and paper towels in Resident #1, #2 and #3's bathrooms.These failures could place residents at risk of living in an uncomfortable and unsafe environment, decreased feelings of self-worth, and a diminished quality of life.During an observation on 7/7/25 at 4:49 p.m. of the downstairs dining room in the secured unit revealed the floor had a sticky/tacky residue, and a squeaking sound was heard from the floor as residents and staff walked around the dining room. The State surveyor's shoes stuck to the floor. The floors looked brown from old food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public.The facility failed to ensure the halls outside of the rooms of Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7 were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized.The walls had bare pieces of unpainted drywall.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment, which could lead to a decreased quality of life.Findings included:Record Review of Resident #2's Facesheet demonstrates they are a resident at Paradigm at the Oak and reside on the secure unit. Resident #2 has a BIMS of 9.An observation on 07/07/25 at 3:25 PM upon entering the facility, the floor was covered in a thin film of grime, causing the investigators' shoes to stick to the floor. The floor was so sticky, detritus stuck to it, giving the floor a textured appearance. Flecks of dirt and pieces of paper were visible and could not be moved when prodded with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 4 of 8 residents reviewed for abuse. Resident #1 and Resident # 2 had an altercation on 5/2/25 due to Resident # 1 was moving too slowly per Resident # 5. Resident #3 and Resident #4 had an altercation on 5/1/25 regarding possession of sunglasses. These failures could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, and/or emotional distress. Findings included: Resident #1 and Resident #2: Record review of Resident #1's chart revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses which include: Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (Atherosclerosis is the buildup of plaque in the arteries, which can reduce blood flow and cause heart disease, stroke, or other conditions), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility repeatedly failed to administer scheduled time-sensitive medications to Residents #1 from 02/05/25 through 02/24/25. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications and supplements or could result in worsening or exacerbation of chronic medical conditions. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's 03/27/25 face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition that combines symptoms of schizophrenia and a mood disorder, such as depression or bipolar), dementia, cognitive communication, presence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage device (a hollow tube surgically placed in the brain to help drain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 resident (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility repeatedly failed to administer scheduled time-sensitive medications to Residents #1 from 02/05/25 through 02/24/25. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications and supplements, worsening or exacerbation of chronic medical conditions, and hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's 03/27/25 face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition that combines symptoms of schizophrenia and a mood disorder, such as depression or bipolar), dementia, cognitive communication, presence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage device (a hollow tube surgically placed in the brain to help…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 of 27 residents (Resident #26, Resident #54, Resident #58, and Resident #365) and 1 of 1 facility reviewed for a clean and homelike environment. A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #54, Resident #58, and Resident #365 had hot water to use for comfortable bathing/showers and ADL care. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's wheelchair was maintained. C) The facility failed to: a. ensure the baseboard in the downstairs dining room next to the soda machine was attached to the wall and the damage to the sheetrock along the wall was repaired. b. ensure the flooring tiles around the soda machine and the ice machine in the dining room were securely attached to the floor and the missing floor tiles were replaced. c. ensure the floor in the downstairs dining room was cleaned and free of dirt, debris, sticky residue, and water. These failures could place residents at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan within seven days after completion of the comprehensive assessment for three ( Resident #4, Resident #21, and Resident #31) of six residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4, Resident #21, and Resident #31 comprehensive care plans were completed within seven after of their comprehensive assessments. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and services to maintain the highest practical well-being. Findings included: Review of Resident # 4's face sheet, dated 01/22/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident # 4 had diagnoses which included seizures ( a sudden burst of abnormal activity in the brain that causes temporary changes in behavior, movement, and awareness), neuroleptic induced parkinsonism (medication caused parkinsonism antipsychotic -included one of the three criteria:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed, to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction on the secure unit. The facility failed to provide activities on the secure unit as scheduled for the month of January 2025. This failure placed residents at risk for boredom, depression, increased behaviors, and diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the January 2025 Activity Calendar for the secure unit reflected it was the same calendar for residents not residing on the secure unit. Review on 01/26/2025 of the large print activity calendar located on the wall in the secure unit reflected on 01/26/2025 Church was to be provided at 9:00 AM. Observation on 01/26/2025 at 9:05 AM there was not church services on the secure unit. Review of the in-room activity participation binder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 9.68% based on 3 out of 31 opportunities, which involved 2 of 4 residents (Resident #17 and Resident #29) and 2 of 2 MA's (MA F and MA G) observed during medication administration reviewed for medication error. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17's blood pressure medication Lisinopril and Losartan had blood pressure parameters for administration. On 01/27/2025 at 8:18 AM, MA F held the medications without physician orders. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29's physician orders were followed for vitamin D tablet 50 mcg. On 01/27/2025 at 9:23 AM, MA G administered Resident #29 Vitamin D 25 mcg. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not receiving therapeutic dosage of medications and symptomatic changes in vital signs. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #17 face sheet, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide M wore a beard guard and Dietary Aide O wore a hair net when standing over the food prep table, clean dishes, and plates of food. 2. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide M used proper hand sanitation during food preparation for the lunch meal. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: 1. Observation on 01/26/2025 at 9:15 AM revealed Dietary Aide O stood over the food prep table and clean dishes and did not wear a hair net . Observation on 01/26/2025 at 12:15 PM revealed Dietary Aide M was not wearing a beard guard and was standing over the plates of food being placed on the meal trays. He had approximately 8 inches of hair growth on the area of his chin and partial both jaws Interview on 01/26/2025 at 9:20 AM, Dietary Aide O stated she was expected to wear a hair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three of 16 residents reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN A used aseptic technique during tracheotomy suctioning and tracheotomy care for Resident #54 on 01/27/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN A performed hand hygiene between glove changes during wound care for Resident #54. 3. The facility failed to ensure RN A performed wound care for Resident #54 using a sterile technique. 4. MA G failed to sanitize the blood pressure cuff during medication pass after using it on Resident #29. These failures could place residents at risk for developing wounds, upper respiratory infections and risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and infections. Findings include:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that describes the services that are to be furnished to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one resident (Resident #18) of 18 reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #18's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected a plan of care for her right-hand contracture (A permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen and a decrease in ROM). This failure could place residents with contractures at risk for decrease in mobility, range of motion, and contribute to worsening of contractures. Findings included: Review of Resident #18's face sheet dated 01/28/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease (A type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior.),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #58's fingernails were cleaned 01/26/2025 through 01/28/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, decreased quality of life, and decreased self-esteem. The findings included: Review of Resident #58's Face Sheet dated 01/28/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) with diabetic chronic kidney disease, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (infections caused by specific bacteria that are resistant to commonly used antibiotics) infection as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care, consistent with professional standards of care to prevent development or worsening of pressure ulcers for one of five residents (Resident #54) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure RN A followed standard precautions during wound care on 01/27/2025 for Resident #54's right and left heels, right and left ischial and coccyx Stage IV pressure ulcers, when she failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes, use a cleaning technique on the pressure ulcer that did not cross contaminate the pressure ulcer or prevent the pressure ulcer once cleaned from becoming re-contaminated. This failure could place residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers leading to discomfort, pain, and potential infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #54's face sheet dated 01/28/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses paraplegia (is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1of 2 residents reviewed with limited range of motion (Resident #18), received appropriate treatment and services to prevent a decrease in range of motion. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 had interventions in place for her right- hand contracture (A permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen and a decrease in ROM) to prevent further decline of the range of motion in her right hand. This deficient practice placed residents with contractures at risk for decrease in mobility, range of motion, and could contribute to worsening of contractures. Findings Include: Review of Resident #18's face sheet dated 01/28/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease (A type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior.), Parkinsonism (A progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are incontinent of bladder receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one of one residents reviewed for catheters (Resident #54). The facility failed to ensure Resident #54 received care to prevent urinary tract infections when RN A placed his catheter bag on the bed with him during wound care. These failures could place residents with external catheters at risk for urinary tract infections and change of condition. Findings included: Review of Resident #54's face sheet dated 01/28/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: paraplegia (is an impairment in motor or sensory function of the lower extremities.), respiratory failure (happens when something keeps your body from getting oxygen into your blood or getting carbon dioxide out of your blood.), and anoxic brain damage (is damage to the brain due to a lack of oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #54) reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility failed to ensure RN A used aseptic technique (a procedure that healthcare providers use to prevent the spread of germs that cause infection.) during tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning for Resident #54 by not performing hand hygiene, placing barriers, or using sterile equipment. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infections and respiratory distress. Findings include: Record review of Resident #54's face sheet, dated 01/28/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #54 had diagnoses which included paraplegia (is an impairment in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for unnecessary drugs. The facility failed to monitor Resident #6 for adverse effects of prophylactic antibiotic use. This failure could place residents at risk of nausea, diarrhea, and secondary infection. Findings include: Record review of Resident #6's admission record, dated 01/26/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included, but not limited to, cerebral infarction (a stroke occurs when blood vessels in the brain are blocked or reduced), paranoid schizophrenia (a mental health condition that affects thinking, memories, and senses, and often involves paranoia and delusions), encephalopathy (a group of disorders that affect the brain and cause altered mental state), and retention of urine. Record review of Resident #6's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that included, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship program. The facility failed to follow antibiotic stewardship policy for Resident #6 by not ensuring a duration for medication. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use and increased multi drug resistant organisms. Findings include: Record review of Resident #6's admission record, dated 01/26/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included, but not limited to, cerebral infarction (a stroke occurs when blood vessels in the brain are blocked or reduced), paranoid schizophrenia (a mental health condition that affects thinking,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident bedside and toilet and bathing facilities were adequately equipped to allow all residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system that would relay the call directly to a staff member or a centralized staff work area for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for resident call system . The facility failed to provide a working communication system, that was easily at reach, that would allow Resident #58 the ability to safely call for staff for assistance. This failure could place residents at risk of not having a means of directly contacting caregivers in an emergency or when they needed support for daily living. The findings include: Record review of Resident #58's Face Sheet, dated 01/28/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #58 had diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and failed to protect and promote the rights of the residents for three (Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6) of eight residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to purchase cigarettes for approximately five days for Residents #4, #5, and #6. This failure placed residents at risk for a decreased quality of life, loss of enjoyment, and loss of freedom. Findings included: Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including legal blindness, history of stroke, and type II diabetes. Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/10/24, reflected a BIMS score of 6, indicating he had a severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for three (Resident #5, Resident #7, and CR #8) of eight residents reviewed for meal palatability. The facility failed to serve food that was palatable and aesthetically appetizing for Resident #5, Resident #7, and CR #8 . This failure could place residents at risk for altered nutritional status, weight loss, and a decline in quality of life. Findings included: Resident #5 Review of Resident #5's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and history of stroke. Review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/14/24, reflected a BIMS score of 10, indicating he had a moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #5's quarterly care plan, dated 09/10/24, reflected he had a nutritional problem or potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or neglect resulted in bodily injury, to other officials (including the State Agency) for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed report an incident of sexual abuse to HHSC after Resident #2 was observed sexually assaulting Resident #1. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of abuse and neglect. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated care plan reflected a [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, cognitive communication deficit, depressive episodes, anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness and atrophy (wasting away). Review of Resident #1's quarterly care plan assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for medications. The facility failed to ensure LVN A did not administer Resident #1 an injection of diphenhydramine HCl solution (an antihistamine) used for agitation without a physician's order. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of consuming unprescribed medications, harm, and hospitalization. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's, undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included epilepsy (seizures), bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/08/24, reflected he had a BIMS of 15, which indicated he had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to date food and beverages found within the facility's freezers and refrigerator. The facility failed to date and properly seal food products in facility freezers. The facility failed to remove dented cans from the dry storage area to prevent service to residents. The facility failed to clean the juice machine nozzle and industrial can opener. These failures could place the residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of cross contamination, loss of nutritional value, weight loss, and foodborne illness. Findings included: In an observation on 11/07/2023 at 9:39 AM, the facility's three door refrigerator (no name or number) was found to contain two plastic bins that held plastic glasses with juice in them. Both bins had aluminum foil across the top of the glasses with one stacked on top of the other, with no date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior environment for residents in the secured unit for ten (room [ROOM NUMBER], 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, and 16) of sixteen occupied rooms. The facility failed to ensure that resident rooms had adequate pressure and hot water. The facility failed to ensure that the faucets in resident rooms had both hot and cold-water knobs. The facility failed to ensure that resident rooms faucets were free of leaks and operational. The facility failed to make repairs to a damaged metal door frame placing residents at risk for injury. These failures could place the residents at risk of not receiving a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment to attain and maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: In an observation on 11/07/2023 at 11:03 AM, the faucet in room [ROOM NUMBER] had no cold-water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his quality of life for one (Resident #4) of one resident reviewed for rights. The facility failed to provide Resident #4 with dignity during breakfast and lunch service when they served his meals to him on a rolling tray table that faced a wall, while all other residents sat at dining tables in view of each other. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #4 was provided assistance when needed during meal times, which resulted in him eating food with his hands, off the tray table, off his wheelchair seat, and the floor. This failure placed the resident at risk of a decline of their sense of dignity, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth. Findings included: Review of Resident #4's Face Sheet ([DATE]) revealed that he was a [AGE] years of age male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility filed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status of 1 of 15 residents reviewed for assessments (Resident #40) Resident #40's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] incorrectly documented active diagnoses of pneumonia and septicemia. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met. Findings included: Review of Resident #40's face sheet printed 11/09/2023 reflected Resident #40 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure), Cerebral Infarction (a blockage that cuts off the blood supply to part of the brain killing brain cells), Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (a condition where the lungs cannot supply oxygen to the blood and organs), Sepsis Unspecified Organism (an infection in the blood stream), Pneumonia (an infection of the air sacks in the lungs often with cough, fever, and difficulty breathing), Hemiplegia (decreased or no movement on one side of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I residents with a mental illness was completed correctly and were provided with a PASARR Level II assessment for two (Resident #44 and Resident #52) of seven residents reviewed for PASARR assessments. Resident #44's PASARR Level l did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although diagnosis was present upon admission. Resident #52's PASARR Level l did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although diagnosis was present upon admission. These failures could place all residents who had a mental illness at risk for not receiving needed assessment, care, and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #44's face sheet printed on 11/09/2023 reflected Resident #44 was admitted [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally combined with a impaired mood) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 (Resident #36) of 1 resident reviewed for trauma-informed care. The facility failed to accurately identify possible triggers for Resident #36 who had a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. This failure could place residents at increased risk for psychological distress due to re-traumatization. Findings included: Review of Resident #36's face sheet printed on 11/09/2023 reflected Resident #36 was admitted [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Chronic (mental health condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by intrusive thoughts about the incident, recurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them for one (Resident #4) of one resident reviewed for feeding assistance. The facility failed to provide Resident #4 with a divided plate to assist him with eating independently. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of self-worth and empowerment for independent eating, which could lead to unplanned weight loss. Findings included: Review of Resident #4's Face Sheet ([DATE]) revealed that he was a [AGE] years of age male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4 is diagnosed Neuroleptic Induced Parkinsonism (antipsychotic medication induced motor syndrome that manifests as rigidity, tremors, and slowness of movement), Schizoaffective Disorder (mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), Severe Dementia with Psychotic Disturbance (decline in thinking and problem-solving skills as well as delusions or hallucinations of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2026-04-02 · tag F0912 — widespread
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide bedrooms that measured at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 3 of 7 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for environment.The facility failed to ensure resident bedrooms rooms, 25, 26, and 27 measured at least 80 square feet per resident.This failure could place residents at risk by limiting the amount of resident care equipment and personal belongings that could be accommodated in the resident's room. This may restrict the resident's' ability to move about the room freely and could negatively affect the residents' quality of life.Observations conducted on 3/31/26 during the initial pool screening beginning at 6:00 AM revealed 3 resident rooms did not have the required amount of living space for each resident.An observation conducted 4/02/2026 at 8:45 AM revealed the following measurements of resident room dimensions for the room size waiver:1. room [ROOM NUMBER] (2-person room - 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview and record review the facility failed to provide bedrooms that measured at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms and at least 100 square feet in single resident rooms for 7 of 50 resident rooms (Rooms 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 35) reviewed for room size variance. The facility failed to ensure resident bedrooms rooms 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 35 measured at least 80 square feet per resident. This failure could place residents at risk of having the restricted amount of resident care equipment and residents' personal effects that could be accommodated in these resident rooms, limit the ability of the residents to move about the room, and decrease the residents' quality of life. The findings include: Observation on 01/27/2025 at 9:30 AM revealed the following measurements of resident room dimensions for the room size waiver: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] (2-person room - 1 residents in room) - 145.69 sq ft. / 2 res = 72.84 sq ft./res. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet for 7 of 50 resident rooms (Rooms 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, and 35), reviewed for room size variance. The facility failed to ensure resident bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet per resident. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life. The findings included: Observation on 11/08/2023 at 9:30 AM revealed the following measurements of resident room dimensions for the room size waiver: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] (2-person room - 1 residents in room) - 145.69 sq ft. / 2 res = 72.84 sq ft./res. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] (2-person room [ROOM NUMBER] residents in room) 146.79 sq ft. / 2 res = 73.35 sq ft./res. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] (2-person room - 2 residents in room) - 150.86 sq ft. / 2 res = 75.43 sq ft./res. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER] (2-person room [ROOM NUMBER] residents in room) -- 150.50 sq ft. / 2 res = 75.25 sq ft./res. 5. room [ROOM NUMBER] (2-person room - 1 residents in room) -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$103,606 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $12,429 — penalty dated 2026-02-20
  • $4,410 — penalty dated 2025-11-21
  • $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-01-17
  • $70,618 — penalty dated 2024-11-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PARADIGM HEALTHCARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.7-1.7 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OAKBEND MEDICAL CENTEROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2023
FREUDENBERGER, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2023
SCHULENBURG NURSING & REHABILITATION LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2023
SHKOP, AHARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2023

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 5%Other / private 14%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$243per resident / day
operating cost
$7,398per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$219per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675971. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next