No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rocky Mountain Care- Clearfield

1481 East 1450 South, Clearfield, UT 84015 · Non profit - Corporation · 168 certified beds · (801) 728-4300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (801) 728-4300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)6 actual-harm citations$58,637 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 6 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $58,637 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2255 N 1700 W · (801) 776-2180 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2132 Robins Dr Ste 210 · (801) 577-7055 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1475 S State St · (801) 825-0788 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.0%11.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.7%3.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.6%16.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.1%15.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.0%25.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.3%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%3.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.7%21.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.9%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%0.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.7%91.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.5%16.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.4%11.6%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.021.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.191.431.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.8%CMS range 46.4–61.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.8–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.5%CMS range 2.7–9.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.07
RN hours/ resident / day
0.55
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.53
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.95
RN hoursweekends
64.1%
Total nursing turnover
38.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 168 beds and averages 121.4 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.07 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.95 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-04-17)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2022-08-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Hcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, for 7 out of 54 sampled residents, multiple residents complained of staffing shortages, long call light response times, and delays in assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Additionally, resident council notes documented late medication administration. Resident identifiers: 1, 7, 9, 13, 31, 73, 86, 110, 113, 127, 129, and 156.Findings included:1. On 5/5/26 at 12:55 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 86. Resident 86 stated that when he pressed the call light it sometimes took forever to be answered. Resident 86 stated that he had therapy that was often delayed because he had to wait for staff assistance to get up. Resident 86 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not treat each resident with respect, dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Specifically, for 5 out of 54 sampled residents, staff were not provided education on how to attach a resident's prosthetic arm, residents complained of having incontinent episodes while waiting for staff to answer call lights, when the staff member tried to empty the ostomy bag it detached, resulting in scattered stool everywhere, and a resident was seated at a table that was at her chin height for breakfast. The first example was cited at harm. Resident identifiers: 21, 34, 63, 86, and 113.Findings included:1. Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included other lack of coordination, weakness, blindness in right eye category 3, blindness in left eye category 3, and acquired absence of left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living. Specifically, for 1 out of 54 sampled residents, a resident was not provided showers as scheduled. This example will be cited at a Harm level. Resident identifier: 1.Findings included:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included morbid obesity, other lack of coordination, weakness, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility.On 5/4/26 at 2:35 PM, a concurrent observation and interview were conducted with resident 1. Resident 1 was observed wearing a hospital gown that had stains on the front of it and hair that appeared to be greasy and uncombed. Resident 1 stated that she had not received daily showers and required assistance with showers from staff. Resident 1 stated that she had to have her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. Specifically, for 1 out of 54 sampled residents, a resident's range of motion decreased with restorative nursing services after the resident was discharged from physical therapy. This was cited at a harm level. Resident identifier: 1.Findings included:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included other abnormalities of gait and mobility, other lack of coordination, and weakness.On 5/4/26 at 11:20 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 1. Resident 1 stated that she was unable to move herself in bed and was waiting for staff to come and boost her up in bed. A care plan Focus initiated on 2/28/25, documented [Resident 1] has a decrease in mobility and functional abilities secondary to respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-04-17 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that for 1 of 55 residents that the facility did not ensure that residents receive proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health, the facility must: Provide foot care and treatment, in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical condition(s) and if necessary, assist the resident in making appointments with a qualified person, and arranging for transportation to and from such appointments. Specifically, a staff member documented a problem with a resident's toe, and it was not addressed by a doctor for 27 days, at which point the toe had become necrotic and surgery was required. Resident identifier: 19. Findings include: 1. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, protein-calorie malnutrition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 4 of 55 sampled residents, a resident was left unsupervised with a damaged bedside table and the resident was observed pulling on the broken plastic with sharp edges; a resident bed was not locked in place resulting in a fall with a finger injury; a resident was being assisted with a transfer by a family member outside, resulting in the resident falling and dislocating a shoulder; and a resident with a history of falls was injured. These findings resulted in a citing of harm for 2 residents. Resident identifiers: 20, 60, 80, and 166. Findings include: HARM 1. Resident 166 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmit to the facility on 1/25/2024 with the diagnoses of periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right hip joint,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for 3 of 54 sampled residents, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were not implemented for a resident receiving wound care, and an observation was made of cross-contamination between residents during meals. Additionally, a resident's tube feeding formula was not capped when disconnected from the resident. Resident identifier: 2, 4, and 8. Finding Included:1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included neutropenia due to infection, cellulitis of right lower limb, cellulitis of left axilla, unspecified open wound right lower leg, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot with fat layer exposed. On 5/4/26 at 8:50 AM, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for 2 of 54 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure residents were given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living (ADLs), including hygiene and dining. Specifically, a resident with visual impairment was not provided assistance with dining and another resident was not provided assistance with bathing. Resident identifiers: 4 and 38.Findings included:1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included category 5 blindness to the right and left eyes, stage 5 chronic kidney disease with heart failure, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.On 5/4/26 at 12:25 PM, an observation was made in the dining room while a meal was being served. Dietary Aide (DA) 1 placed resident 4's meal tray down in front of him and walked away without assisting with set up. A female resident, who was seated next to resident 4, was observed opening up the mustard packets and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not immediately inform a resident's representatives after an accident, which resulted in injury and required physician intervention for 1 of 12 sampled residents. Specifically, when a resident had a fall, sustained a femur fracture, and required hospitalization, staff did not attempt to notify additional resident representatives when the primary contact did not answer the telephone. Resident identifier: 3. Findings included: Resident 3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after a brief hospital stay from December 4, 2024 to December 9, 2024 related to pneumonia. The licensor reviewed Resident 3's medical record, and the following entries were observed: On December 13, 2024, at 9:23 PM, staff member (SM) 1 documented in a progress note that resident 3 was writhing in pain. An assessment of the left lower extremity was conducted, and Resident 3 was grimacing in pain with movement, touch, and abduction. The provider was contacted, and an order was received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, for 4 of 55 sampled residents, the facility did not treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Specifically, a staff member did not have an appropriate response to a resident statement, a resident was not provided a dignified dining experience and call lights were not answered in a timely manner. Resident identifiers: 12, 20, 50, and 259. Findings include: 1. Resident 259 was admitted to the facility initially on 3/13/24, and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis of the right leg, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia and hypoxia, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and morbid obesity. On 4/9/24 at 9:09 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 259. Resident 259 stated she had not had a shower in two weeks, prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that, for 3 of 55 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. Specifically, there were multiple instances where the facility was dirty and not homelike. Resident identifiers: 20, 80, and 259. Findings Include: 1. Resident 259 was admitted to the facility initially on 3/13/24, and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis of the right leg, encephalopathy, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia and hypoxia, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and morbid obesity. On 4/9/24 at 9:20 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 259. Resident 259 stated she went out to smoke twice daily. Resident 259 stated in the smoking area, the cigarette ashtray was broken with cigarette butts overflowing with cigarette butts all over the ground. On 4/8/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 3 of 55 sample residents. Specifically, a resident stated they had been abused and not follow up investigation was documented, interviews were not documented with all staff members involved in the investigation, and a through investigation was not conducted. Resident identifier: 79, 82 and 86. Findings include: 1. Resident 79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, critical illness myopathy, tracheostomy status and anxiety disorder. Resident 79's medical record was reviewed from 4/8/24 through 4/17/24. Resident 79 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14 indicating cognition is intact. A form titled exhibit 358 revealed an employee reported that resident 79 had been unchanged for sometime by CNA 6, who knew that the resident was soiled.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident 60 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, insomnia unspecified, essential (primary) hypertension, peripheral vascular disease unspecified, other intervertebral disc degeneration lumbosacral region, dependence on renal dialysis, displaced avulsion fracture (chip fracture) of left talus, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, and dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Resident 60's medical record was reviewed from 4/8/24 through 4/17/24. Resident 60's most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score from her most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] was a 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident 60's MDS Assessment also indicated that Resident 60 required partial/moderate assistance to shower and bathe herself. Resident 60's care plan was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for 4 of 55 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal and oral hygiene. Specifically, residents requiring assistance with bathing were not provided regular showers or bed baths. Resident identifiers: 2, 34, 82, and 259. Findings include: 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, cellulitis of lower limb, chronic non-pressure ulcer of foot, urinary incontinence, hemiplegia and hemiparesis on left non-dominant side, dysphagia, and abnormal gait and mobility. Resident 2's medical records were reviewed between 4/8/24 and 4/17/24. A review of resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed that it was very important for resident 2 to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. The MDS also revealed that resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that for 6 of 55 sample residents, the residents were seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission, and at least once every 60 thereafter. Specifically, residents were being seen by an alternate provider such as a Nurse Practitioner, instead of a physician. Resident identifiers: 19, 46, 49, 62, 102, and 166. Findings include: 1. Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included right knee flail joint, morbid obesity, weakness, insomnia, schizoaffective disorder, depression, osteoarthritis, and chronic pain. Resident 46's medical record was reviewed from 4/8/24 through 4/17/24. Resident 46's progress notes indicated that although the resident had been seen by a Nurse Practitioner (NP) multiple times, the resident had not been seen by a physician since the resident's admission nearly 3 months prior. 2. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility did not have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, multiple residents and staff voiced concern about the staffing level, showers were not provided as scheduled, call lights were not answered timely, and the environment was observed to be soiled. Resident identifiers: 19, 23, 26, 37, 46, 56, 60, 98, 99, 208, 259, and 309. Findings include: 14. On 4/11/24 at 8:05 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 4. CNA 4 stated that she stopped picking up shifts at the facility because administration would not listen to her. CNA 4 stated that the facility was very busy, short staffed, and residents were not getting the care that they needed or deserved. CNA 4 stated that on one occasion a licensed nurse asked for her assistance with a dressing change and during this time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biological's were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, were stored under proper temperature controls, and included the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, a resident had insulin pens at bedside with out storage to prevent access to the insulin by other residents. Medication was left at the bedside of a resident who was not assessed for self administration of medication. A multi use vials of medications were opened and available for use date indicated medications were expired and still available for use. The medication fridge indicated temperatures too cold for safe medication storage. Resident identifiers: 15, 21, and 92. Findings included: 1. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, chronic venous hypertension, acquired absence of right leg below knee. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, the facility did not label or date multiple food items in the walk-in fridge and refrigerator, there were physical food contamination hazards present in the kitchen, and kitchen staff did not prepare and serve food in a hygienic manner. Findings Include: On 4/8/24 at 8:54 AM, an observation was made of one of the facility's freezers. Inside was an undated tub of ice cream, a box of open undated Udi buns, undated pie crusts, a package of undated [NAME] Spunkmeyer cookie dough, a bag of undated whipped topping, 7 undated frozen pies, and 2 bags of undated frozen fruit. On 4/8/24 at 8:58 AM, an observation was made of a ceiling vent and the ceiling directly above a food preparation area. The vent was covered in dust and the ceiling paint was peeling and flaky. On 4/8/24 at 9:00 AM, an observation was made of the food dry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that for 3 of 55 sample residents, medical records were complete and accurately documented. Resident identifiers: 3, 19, and 46. Findings include: 1. Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included right knee flail joint, morbid obesity, weakness, insomnia, schizoaffective disorder, depression, osteoarthritis, and chronic pain. Resident 46's medical record was reviewed from 4/8/24 through 4/17/24. Resident 46's progress notes indicated that on 2/25/24 a Psych (psychiatric) NP (Nurse Practitioner) eval (evaluation) done. per provider orders, discontinue seroquel, start ability 5mg (milligrams) QAM (every morning) x (for) 1 week then increase to 10 mg QAM. The psychiatric evaluation could not be located in resident 46's medical record. On 4/17/24 at 3:40 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON confirmed that the psychiatric evaluation completed for resident 46 on 2/25/24 was not in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    On 4/17/24 at 3:27 PM an interview with the Administrator was conducted. The Administrator stated that the QAPI team met at least quarterly but tried to meet monthly if possible. The Administrator stated that the QAPI team consisted of the Administrator, the Medical Director, the Dietary Manager, the Director of Nursing, the Resident Advocate, Social Work, Nurse Management, and Therapy. The Administrator stated that every month, members of the QAPI team would bring information including quarterly measures, grievances, infection control updates, among other assignments that the staff go over and determine what areas needed to be improved. The Administrator stated that once an improvement process had begun, monitors were put in place and were checked as needed. The Administrator stated that if the improvement process was not working, then they would change the process and continue to monitor until the improvement process met satisfactory levels. The Administrator stated that a recent process that the QAPI team worked on was increasing the Physician visits for residents. Based on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that each resident's medical record included documentation that indicated that the resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations; and that the resident either received the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations or did not receive the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations due to medical contraindications or refusal. Specifically, for 3 sampled residents, the facility did not keep documentation within the residents' medical record regarding the residents' pneumococcal consent status or education of the benefits and potential risks associated with the immunization. Resident identifiers: 3, 15, and 19. Findings Included: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of polyneuropathy, unspecified fracture of left femur, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0923 — pattern
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility did not have adequate outside ventilation by means of windows, or mechanical ventilation, or a combination of the two. Specifically, there were numerous odors throughout the facility. Findings Include: On 4/8/24 at 10:30 AM an observation was made of the 200 hallway. There was a strong odor of bowel movement throughout the hallway. On 4/8/24 at 11:53 AM, an observation was made of the 300 hallway. There was a strong smell of urine throughout the entire hallway. On 4/10/24 at 8:22 AM, an observation was made of the 400 hallway. There was a strong odor of urine throughout the hallway. On 4/10/24 at 8:32 AM an observation was made in the 100 hallway. There was a strong odor of bowel movement throughout the entire hallway. On 4/10/24 at 8:42 AM, an observation was made of the 400 hallway. The strong odor of urine was still present. On 4/10/24 at 9:17 AM, an observation was made of the intersection between the 200 hall and the 300 hall. There was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not provide written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room or roommate in the facility was changed. Specifically, for 2 out of 55 sampled residents, residents did not receive written notice prior to the room change. Resident identifiers: 166 and 259. Findings Included: 1. Resident 166 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmit to the facility on 1/25/2024 with the diagnosis of Periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right hip joint, subsequent encounter, Acute kidney failure, Neoplasm of unspecified behavior of bladder, Fall on same level from slipping, tripping and stumbling without subsequent striking against object, subsequent encounter, Human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] disease. Resident 166's medical records were reviewed on 4/15/24. Resident 166's medical record was reviewed, and it documented resident 166 had been moved from room [ROOM NUMBER] A to room [ROOM NUMBER]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 55 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident had the right to send and receive mail including the right to privacy of such communications. Specifically, a resident received two letters via the postal service and facility staff opened the letters. Resident identifier: 26. Findings included: Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of cellulitis, orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, osteomyelitis, chronic kidney disease, acquired absence of right leg above knee, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, gastroparesis, and type 1 diabetes mellitus. On 4/08/24 at 12:56 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 26. Resident 26 stated that the lady in the front office was opening his mail and it happened two times. Resident 26 stated that the mail was part of his divorce paperwork and dealt with his 401K. Resident 26 stated that he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 55 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident's right to formulate an advanced directive, including implementing the advanced directive per the facility policy was completed. Specifically, two residents' electronic medical records (EMR) documented that the residents' code status was Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) when the resident's Provider Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form documented full treatment. Resident identifiers: 19 and 92. Findings included: 1. Resident 92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of osteoarthritis, schizoaffective disorder, depression, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On 4/8/24, resident 92's medical records were reviewed. Resident 92's EMR dashboard documented DNR, and that the resident was a hospice patient. Resident 92's physician orders documented Resident POLST Status=FULL CODE. On 11/10/23, resident 92's POLST…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined, the facility did not provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Specifically, for 5 out of 37 sampled residents, resident rooms were observed to be unclean with debris on the floor. In addition, Hoyer lifts for resident care were observed to be soiled. Resident identifiers: 7, 19, 26, 62, and 80. Findings included: 1. On 8/1/22 at 8:31 AM, an observation was made on the 300 hallway of a dirty Hoyer lift. The Hoyer lift was outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] and the base of the Hoyer lift was observed soiled. On 8/1/22 at 9:02 AM, an observation was made on the 100 hallway of a dirty Hoyer lift. The Hoyer lift was observed to be stationed outside of resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The base of the Hoyer lift was observed to be soiled. The daily shower log documented that the walkers and wheelchairs were scheduled to be cleaned on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday on the night shift for the 300…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Specifically, for 10 out of 37 sampled residents, residents who were dependent on staff for showers, did not receive showers on a consistent and regular basis. Resident identifiers: 19, 26, 29, 32, 54, 62, 63, 80, 81, and 84. Findings include: 1. Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, constipation, pain, hypoglycemia, essential hypertension, and hemiplegia, unspecified affecting unspecified side. On 8/2/22 at 9:31 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 29. Resident 29 stated he was dependent on staff for assistance with his activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident 29 stated he can not bathe, dress, or transfer himself without help.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility did not have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill set to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessment and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. Specifically, for 6 out of 37 sampled residents, resident showers were not being completed due to staffing, complaints from residents regarding staffing and not receiving cares, and long call light times were observed. Resident identifiers: 7, 32, 40, 52, 54, and 121. Findings included: 1. On 8/1/22 at 9:08 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 7. Resident 7 stated the facility was short staffed at night. Resident 7 stated there were three staff for the entire facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. Specifically, the facility was found to be in non-compliance with F584, and F880 which were cited within the facility's 2020 recertification survey. In addition, the facility was found to be in non-compliance with F758 and F761 which were cited within the facility's 2017, 2019, and 2020 recertification survey. Findings included: An annual recertification survey was completed on 10/16/17. The following deficiencies included, but not limited to, F329 (F758) and F431 (F761). An annual recertification survey was completed on 1/10/19. The following deficiencies included, but not limited to, F758 and F761. An annual recertification survey was completed on 2/10/20. The following deficiencies included, but not limited to, F584, F758, F761, and F880. 1. Based on observation and interview, it was determined, the facility did not provide housekeeping and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 8/1/22 at 8:59 AM, an observation was made of Registered Nurse (RN) 1 and Nursing Student (NS) 1 exiting resident room [ROOM NUMBER] which had signage on the door indicating the resident was on droplet precautions. Door signage also included instructions for donning appropriate PPE and doffing PPE. Both nurses were observed not to sanitize their eye protection after exiting the room. An interview was conducted with RN 1. RN 1 stated that Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, for residents on quarantine, required staff to don a mask, eye protection, a gown, and gloves before entering a room, and doff the gown and gloves when exiting the room. RN 1 also stated staff should perform hand hygiene after exiting and sanitize the eye protection. RN 1 stated both staff should have sanitized their eye protection and they did not. 3. On 8/2/22 at 9:28 AM, CNA 1 was observed to enter resident room [ROOM NUMBER], where the resident was on contact precautions for a multi-drug resistant organism wound.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not review and revise the comprehensive care plan after each assessment. Specifically, for 1 out of 37 sampled residents, the care plan did not address a resident's intravenous (IV) hydration status. Resident identifier: 80. Findings included: Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, pulmonary hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cognitive communication deficit, adult failure to thrive, pulmonary hypertension, hypothyroidism, celiac disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, disorder of phosphorus metabolism, hypomagnesemia, major depressive disorder, essential tremor, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. On 8/1/22 at 8:44 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 2. RN 2 stated that resident 80 had an IV infusion of magnesium with normal saline (NS) every other day. On 8/1/22 at 11:41 AM, an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality. Specifically, for 1 out of 37 sampled residents, a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube feeding did not have the bag labeled with the formula type, rate of infusion, resident identification information, date and time of administration, or the nurse initials who initiated the infusion. Resident identifier: 99. Findings included: Resident 99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included [NAME]-Sachs disease, bipolar disorder, pseudobulbar affect, anxiety disorder, periodontal disease, hypotension, seizures, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, thrombocytopenia, dysphagia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, pain, muscle spasms, right artificial hip joint, and gastrostomy tube. On 8/1/22 at 8:44 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 2. RN 2 stated that resident 99 had a tube feed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility did not provide necessary respiratory care and services consistent with the resident's care plan and goals. Specifically, for 1 out of 37 sampled residents, a resident's oxygen tubing and prefilled humidifier bottle were not changed as ordered by the physician, and the filter on the concentrator was not cleaned as ordered by the physician. Resident identifier: 14. Findings included: Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure, morbid obesity, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, and unspecified psychosis. On 8/2/22 at 8:16 AM, an observation was made of resident 14 receiving oxygen at 4 liters per minute via nasal canula from an oxygen concentrator. The oxygen concentrator was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services. Specifically, for 1 out of 37 sampled residents, a resident reported uncontrolled pain and missed pain medication administration. Resident identifier: 62. Findings included: Resident 62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included non-ST elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarction, pneumonia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, chest pain, hypotension of hemodialysis, end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypothyroidism, paraplegia, morbid obesity, history of transient ischemic attack, pain, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, pulmonary embolism, insomnia, major depressive disorder, colostomy, artificial opening of urinary tract, and pelvic inflammatory disease. On 8/1/22 at 12:27 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 62.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the irregularities noted by the pharmacist during the drug regimen review must be reported to the attending physician and the facility's Medical Director and Director of Nursing (DON), and these reports must be acted upon. Specifically, for 2 out of 37 sampled residents, a pharmacy recommendation to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) on a resident's medication was not acted upon when the physician agreed with the pharmacy recommendation. In addition, . Resident identifiers: 7 and 62. Findings included: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but not limited to, cerebral palsy, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, Parkinson's disease, sleep disorder, convulsions, and pain. Resident 7's medical record was reviewed on 8/2/22. The Pharmacy Consultation Report dated 3/10/22, documented [Name of resident 7 removed] has a long standing order for Lamotrigine 150 mg [milligrams] twice daily. Please attempt a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure each resident's drug regimen remained free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which would indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued. Specifically, for 2 out of 37 sampled residents, a resident's medications were not administered per the physician's orders and medications were omitted and documented as not being administered at all. Resident identifiers: 62 and 80. Findings included: 1. Resident 62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included non-ST elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarction, pneumonia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, chest pain, hypotension of hemodialysis, end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, gastro-esophageal reflux disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that a resident who used psychotropic drugs was not given these drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. Residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions (GDR), and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. Specifically, for 1 out of 37 sampled residents, a resident received one GDR on an antipsychotic medication for bipolar disorder that was initiated by the facility on 9/1/21. Resident identifier: 7. Findings included: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but not limited to, cerebral palsy, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, Parkinson's disease, sleep disorder, convulsions, and pain. Resident 7's medical record was reviewed on 8/2/22. A physician's order dated 9/1/21, documented Latuda (lurasidone) tablet 20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles, included the accessory and cautionary instructions and the expiration date when applicable, and were stored in locked compartments. Specifically, observations were made of medications left unattended on top of the medication cart and a medication was found available for use without an expiration date or dosage visible. Findings included: 1. On 8/3/22 at 7:59 AM, an observation was made of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 during morning medication administration on the 300 hallway. LPN 1 was observed to leave the following medications unattended on top of the medication cart while inside a resident room; Meropenem 500 milligram intravenous, Combigan 0.2-0.5 % drops, Dorzolamide 2 % drops, and Prednisone acetate 1% drops. On 8/3/22 at 8:05 AM, upon return to the medication cart with LPN 1 the above medications were observed missing from the top of the cart. An immediate interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-09 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility did not provide the special eating equipment and utensils for residents who needed them. Specifically, for 1 out of 37 sampled residents, the facility did not provide the resident with weighted utensils to assist with dining. Resident identifier: 80. Findings included: Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, pulmonary hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cognitive communication deficit, adult failure to thrive, pulmonary hypertension, hypothyroidism, celiac disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, disorder of phosphorus metabolism, hypomagnesemia, major depressive disorder, essential tremor, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. On 8/1/22 at 9:24 AM, an interview was conducted with the Central Supply Manager (CSM). The CSM stated that resident 80 had refused his breakfast and was upset. The CSM stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, the facility did not maintain records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, and readily accessible. Specifically, for 2 out of 37 sampled residents, progress notes for a resident had notes from other residents located inside their medical record, and pharmacy monthly medication reviews were not located in the resident's medical record. Resident identifiers: 62 and 80. Findings included: 1. Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, pulmonary hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cognitive communication deficit, adult failure to thrive, pulmonary hypertension, hypothyroidism, celiac disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, disorder of phosphorus metabolism, hypomagnesemia, major depressive disorder, essential tremor, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. On 8/4/22, resident 80's progress notes were reviewed and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 3 of 45 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater. Specifically, 4 medication errors were observed out of 31 observations with a medication error rate of 12.9%. Resident identifiers: 7, 99, and 330. Findings include: 1. Resident 330 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included quadriplegia C1-C4 complete, stage 3 pressure ulcer, hypertension, mood disorder, and pain. On 2/6/20 at 8:30 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 was observed to prepare and administer medications to resident 330. LPN 1 was observed to prepare an intravenous (IV) infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam (Zosyn) 3.375 grams (gm). The vial of powdered Zosyn was reconstituted into a bag of Normal Saline 100 milliliters (ml). LPN 1 was observed to attach the IV tubing to the reconstituted bag of Zosyn and the tubing line was primed to the end of the tubing. No excess liquid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 45 sampled residents, that the facility did not determine that the right to self-administer medications was safe and clinically appropriate. Specifically, a resident was observed to self administer insulin incorrectly and the entire dose was not dispensed. Resident identifier: 7. Findings include: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection, altered mental status, acute kidney failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic encephalopathy, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. On 2/6/20 at 9:15 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 5 was observed to prepare and administer medications to resident 7. RN 5 obtained resident 7's Lantus insulin pen from the medication cart. RN 5 dialed the pen to dispense 65 units and then gave the pen to resident 7 to self administer. Resident 7 was observed to press the tip of the pen to the abdomen while pressing the plunger of the pen. Resident 7's hands…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, residents complained of smoking odors and observations were made of residents smoking in close proximity to the facility. Findings include: On 2/4/20 at approximately 10:15 AM, an interview was conducted with a resident whose room was located on the 300 hallway. The resident stated it smells smoky in here and the facility was working on moving her to a different room. The resident further stated she wore a surgical mask because the facility smelled of cigarette smoke. On 2/4/20 at 1:47 PM, an observation was made in the television area located at the intersection of the 100 and 200 hallways. A resident was observed smoking directly outside of the door leading from the television area to the outdoor courtyard. On 2/4/20 at 2:40 PM, the 300 hallway was observed to smell of cigarette smoke. The Social Services Director (SSD) was observed walking down the 300 hallway and was immediately interviewed. The SSD stated it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, for 2 of 45 sampled residents, the facility did not make prompt efforts to resolve grievances the residents may have. Specifically, grievances filed by the residents were not addressed by the facility in a timely manner. Resident identifiers: 6 and 112. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease, pain, insomnia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, dysphagia, anoxic brain damage, and dystonia. On 2/4/20 at 10:35 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 6. Resident 6 stated she had several personal items that were missing and she notified facility staff. Resident 6 further stated her laptop went missing two weeks prior, and more and more jewelry was missing every day. Resident 6 further stated her missing items had not been replaced and the facility had not followed up with her about her missing items. The facility's grievance binder was reviewed and documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 45 sampled residents, that the facility assessment did not accurately reflect the resident's status. Specifically, a resident who did not require an anticoagulant medication was coded as receiving anticoagulants. In addition, a resident with a Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level II was coded as currently not considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. Resident identifiers: 9 and 64. Findings include: 1. Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, bipolar disorder, and epilepsy. On 2/4/20 at 12:28 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 64. Resident 64 was asked if she had received her blood thinning medication as ordered by the physician and in a timely manner by staff. Resident 64…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 45 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. Specifically, a resident with a contracture did not receive range of motion services in order to prevent further decrease in range of motion. Resident identifier: 80. Findings include: Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included disorientation, pain, hypertension, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, encephalopathy, dysphagia, and anxiety disorder. On 2/4/20 at 1:26 PM, an observation was made of resident 80. Resident 80 was observed laying in bed, and her right hand was contracted into a closed position. Furthermore, resident 80 was not observed to have a splint, brace, or other device in place. On 2/4/20 at 2:53 PM, a follow up observation was made of resident 80.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 of 45 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, one resident was not provided with assistance and interventions to prevent falls in accordance with her plan of care and a second resident was burned by a steam table located in the dining room. Resident identifiers: 6 and 112. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease, pain, insomnia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, dysphagia, anoxic brain damage, and dystonia. On 2/4/20 at 10:35 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 6. Resident 6 stated she fell many times since admitting to the facility, and most recently fell in the bathroom. Resident 6 further stated the facility had not put anything in place to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 45 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill set necessary to care for the residents' needs. Specifically, an observation was made of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 administering intravenous (IV) medications improperly and the LPN did not have the credentials that documented competency in IV infusions. Resident identifier: 330. Findings include: Resident 330 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included quadriplegia C1-C4 complete, stage 3 pressure ulcer, hypertension, mood disorder, and pain. On 2/6/20 at 8:30 AM, an observation was made of LPN 1 during morning medication administration. LPN 1 was observed to prepare an IV infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam (Zosyn) 3.375 grams (gm). The vial of powdered Zosyn was reconstituted into a bag of Normal Saline 100 milliliters (ml). LPN 1 was observed to attach the IV tubing to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 45 sampled residents, that the facility did not establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and determine that all drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled. Specifically, the facility did not have a narcotics reconciliation process in place and the Narcotic Record Log did not match the Medication Administration Records (MAR). Resident identifiers: 31 and 50. Findings include: 1. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paraplegia, anxiety, orthostatic hypotension, unstable burst fracture, rib fracture, depressive disorder, mono-neuropathy, and chronic pain. On 2/5/20 at 1:45 PM, resident 31 was interviewed. Resident 31 stated that he had chronic back pain and that he received multiple pain medications for pain control. Resident 31 stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not ensure that as needed (PRN) psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days except if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond the 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order. Specifically, for 1 of 45 sampled residents, an anti-anxiety drug was not limited to 14 days and the resident's record did not document a rationale for use including a duration for the order. Resident identifier: 112. Findings include: Resident 112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, bipolar, disorder, hypertension, pain, Wernicke's encephalopathy, and acute respiratory failure. A review of resident 112's medical record was completed on 2/10/20. Resident 112's physician's orders were reviewed. The orders documented that resident 112 was prescribed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility did not label all drugs in accordance with professional standards and with the expiration date, and all drugs and biologicals were not stored under proper temperature controls. Specifically, an opened vial of insulin was not labeled with an expiration date and a medication fridge was not registering within the temperature control range for the stored medication. Findings include: 1. On 2/6/20 at 11:27 AM, the medication cart on the 700 hallway was inspected. An open vial of Admelog (Lispro) insulin 100 units/milliliter vial was documented with a date of 2/3/20. The vial did not document if the date was an open date or an expiration date. An immediate interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 6. RN 6 stated that she would consider the date an expiration date based on the bottle being half empty. RN 6 stated that it was not possible to verify if the date was for open or expiration. RN 6 stated she would discard the medication and obtain a new vial. 2. On 2/6/20 at 11:46 AM, the medication fridge on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined, for 1 of 45 sampled residents, that the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, facility staff were observed to bare handed touch medication during medication preparation. Resident identifier: 54. Findings include: Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, major depressive disorder, and Schizophrenia. On 2/6/20 at 10:00 AM, Student Nurse (SN) 1 was observed to prepare and dispense medications for resident 54. SN 1 was not observed to perform hand hygiene prior to dispensing the medication. SN 1 dispensed Lorazepam 1 milligram (mg) tablet into the palm of her hand and then picked it up with three fingers and placed it into a medication cup. SN 1 then dispensed Seroquel 150 mg, 3 tablets into the palm of her hand. One tablet fell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$58,637 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $58,637 — penalty dated 2024-04-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ROCKY MOUNTAIN CARE — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BEAVER CITY CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/24/2014
RMCE OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/15/2026
BANGERTE, NATHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2025
BANGERTER, EDWARDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2025
BANGERTER, JOHNATHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2025
BARNEY, JANETTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2012
BEEMAN, RAYMONDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/22/2022
BOARDMAN, LAURAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/22/2022
BROWN, GARYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2011
DARBY, MEGANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2025
GATHERUM, JASONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2025
HALE, FREDRICKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/22/2022
HANSEN, KENTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2025
MIKESELL, BRADLEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/22/2022
NEVES, COURTNEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2025
OAKDEN, RICHARDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2010
OWENS, JONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2025
ROBINSON, MATTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2019
SAMUELSON, LANCEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/22/2022
SCHENA, TYLERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2024
SMITH, VALIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2019
SNOWBALL, KELLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2025
WIDDISON, ALANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/22/2022
WRIGHT, CRAIGIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2019
LANGFORD, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2018
MOSS, TYLERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2018
RMCE CLEARFIELD SNF OC LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/15/2026
BIDDULPH, GLENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
WESTON, GARRETTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/15/2025
BCCU, INC - CLEARFIELDOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/28/2025
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/17/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.1M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 4%Other / private 30%

This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$443per resident / day
operating cost
$13,468per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$368per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Utah
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,475/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 465067. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next