No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Fond du Lac Lutheran Home

244 N Macy St, Fond du Lac, WI 54935 · Non profit - Corporation · 85 certified beds · (920) 921-9520 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$9,113 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $9,113 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-27)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
145 N Main St · (920) 926-8492 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.1 mi
192 N Main St · (920) 921-5264 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
306 N Main St · (920) 924-3577 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4 S Sophia St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.6%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%2.7%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%5.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%3.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.1%18.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.2%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.1%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.1%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.9%24.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.2%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine59.3%82.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.9%23.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.7%15.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.421.661.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.832.291.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.1%CMS range 27.5–47.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.9–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge28.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened10.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.4–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.83
RN hours/ resident / day
0.45
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.29
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
59.3%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 54.9 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-04)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R1) of 1 resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. On 2/23/25, R1 was assessed to be at risk for elopement after R1 attempted to elope fromv the facility. Staff placed a WanderGuard bracelet on R1. On 2/24/25, R1 expressed a desire to leave the facility and go to a local store. On 2/26/25, R1 cut off R1's WanderGuard and a new WanderGuard was applied. On 2/28/25 at 8:35 AM, R1 left the facility without staffs' knowledge and was redirected back into the facility. On 2/28/25 at 3:30 PM, staff found R1 outside walking back from a local store that was approximately 0.3 miles from the facility. R1 had eloped from the facility without staffs' knowledge. The facility's failure to supervise a resident who was assessed as an elopement risk and had a history of elopement attempts and cutting off a WanderGuard led to a finding of Immediate Jeopardy that began on 2/28/25. Surveyor notified Nursing Home Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care and treatment were provided for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents with a pacemaker (a device placed in the body to support the electrical system in the heart). Staff did not assist R1 in scheduling appointments with a cardiologist to check R1's cardiac health or ensure R1's pacemaker worked properly. On [DATE], R1 was admitted to the hospital after R1's pacemaker battery died and R1's heart rate was in the 30s. (A typical resting heart rate for adults is between 60 and 100 beats per minute.) Findings include: On [DATE], Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] following hospitalization for pacemaker failure. R1 had diagnoses including acute congestive heart failure (CHF), dyspnea (shortness of breath) and respiratory abnormalities, symptomatic bradycardia (a low heart rate), and sick sinus syndrome (a group of abnormal heart rhythms usually caused by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to discuss risks versus benefits and obtain informed consent for the use of psychotropic medication for 1 resident (R) (R4) of 3 sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to cause a psychosocial decline in R4's mental status. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Standard Psychoactive Medication Protocol policy revealed: .Individual is prescribed a psychotropic medication .Nursing: .Review and obtain signature for informed consent with individual or responsible party. Review of R4's Face Sheet revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), dementia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. R4 had a Guardian who was R4's Responsible Party (RP). Review of an Order Entry, dated 11/4/25, revealed an order for Depakote Extended Release (ER) (an anticonvulsant and mood stabilizer medication) 250 milligrams (mg) daily for sexually inappropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 50 of 51 residents residing in the facility. (One resident received nutritional needs via tube feeding.)Staff did not consistently monitor and document warewasher (dishwasher) wash and rinse cycles temperatures or chemical pH levels for the chlorine sanitizer.Staff did not consistently test and document the parts per million (PPM) and temperature of the sanitizing solution in the 3-compartment sink.Staff did not consistently monitor and document cooked food temperatures or hot/cold holding temperatures.Staff did not consistently maintain kitchen cooler and freezer logs. Findings include:During an initial tour of the kitchen on 9/2/25 at 9:28 AM, Surveyor interviewed Dietary Manager (DM)-C who indicated the facility follows the Wisconsin Food Code.The 2022 Wisconsin Food Code documents at 2-103.11 Person in Charge: The person in charge shall ensure that .(G) Employees are properly cooking time/temperature control for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the opportunity to participate in quarterly care conferences was provided for 1 resident (R) (R8) of 22 sampled residents.The facility did not include R8 in quarterly care conferences since 11/5/24.Findings include:The facility's Individual Care Plan Conferences policy, dated 2/2024, indicates: .3. An individual care plan review will be held every three months after the initial care plan conference is held. Scheduling will be done by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse or designee. The Life Coach will invite the individual or responsible party to the care plan review .From 9/2/25 to 9/4/25, Surveyor reviewed R8's medical record. R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including surgical amputation of toe, cellulitis of left lower limb, sepsis, and diabetes. R8's MDS assessment, dated 8/29/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R8 had intact cognition. R8 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 residents (R) (R6 and R7) of 3 residents observed during the provision of cares. R6 had a feeding tube and was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). During an observation of care for R6, Registered Nurse (RN)-D did not wear the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).Used gloves were observed on a railing outside R7's room following an observation of care for R7. Findings include:The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy, dated 2/6/25, indicates: EBP is used in conjunction with standard precautions and expand the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to the donning of a gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for the transfer of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to staffs' hands and clothing. EBP is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff and resident interview, the facility did not provide a safe, sanitary, or home-like environment for 1 resident (R) (R5) of six sampled residents. On 3/25/25, bowel movement (BM) soiled cloths were observed on R5's bathroom sink. Findings include: The facility provided an undated Standard Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Protocol that did not mention where staff should place soiled items during the provision of care. On 3/25/25, Surveyor reviewed R5's medical record. R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side and post-polio syndrome. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/17/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R5 had no cognitive impairment. R5 was responsible for R5's healthcare decisions. On 3/25/25 at 11:56 AM, Surveyor interviewed R5 who was in bed. When asked about the cleanliness of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure required nurse aid training was completed for 1 of 5 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs). CNA-D was hired on 8/23/23. CNA-D did not have 12 hours of in-service training during CNA-D's most recent anniversary hire year. Findings include: According to the Wisconsin Department of Health Services' Webpage titled Nurse Aide Program: Maintaining Registry Status, when an individual is placed on the Wisconsin Nurse Aid Registry, they are given two eligibilities: federal and state. Federal eligibility is mandated by federal law for individuals who work in federally licensed nursing homes. (https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/caregiver/nurse-aide/maintain-status.htm) The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan policy indicates all staff will participate in ongoing annual QAPI training which includes quality improvement principles and practices, how to identify areas for improvement, updates on current performance improvement projects, and how staff can be involved in performance improvement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse for 1 of 8 facility and contracted staff reviewed for caregiver background checks. The facility did not ensure a thorough and timely background check was completed for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-D. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Program policy, with a review date of 11/8/23, indicates: The object of the abuse policy is to comply with the seven-step approach to abuse and neglect detection and prevention .Screening: .It is the policy of this facility to screen employees .prior to working with residents. Screening components include verification of references, certification and verification of license, and criminal background check. Procedure: 1. Employee Screening and Training - a. Before new employees are permitted to work with residents, references provided by the prospective employee will be verified as well as appropriate board registrations and certifications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and misappropriation for 2 residents (R) (R2 and R3) of 2 sampled residents. The facility did not thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for R2. The facility did not thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation for R3. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation policy, with a review date of 11/8/23, indicates: It is the policy of the facility that everyone will be free from abuse .Verbal abuse involves the use of speech, sound, writing, or gestures when communicating with residents or their families or when within their hearing or sight regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability .Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent .E. Investigation: .It is the policy of this facility that reports of abuse are promptly and thoroughly investigated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure sufficient staffing to meet residents' care needs. This had the potential to affect multiple residents residing in the facility. Fifteen of 30 staffing shifts reviewed did not meet Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-to-resident staffing ratios outlined in the the Facility Assessment which was last updated in April of 2024. Observations indicated call lights were not answered timely and resident care was not provided timely. Resident and staff interviews identified concerns with the provision and receipt of timely and complete care. Findings include: The Facility Assessment, dated April 2024, contained the following information: Staffing Plan: There are 2 Registered Nurses (RNs) and 1 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) scheduled for the AM/PM shift and 1 RN for the night (NOC) shift. One Medication Administration Assistant (MAA) is scheduled for the AM/PM shift if an LPN is not available. The following ratios are scheduled for CNAs in response to daily census numbers: 1:11 on AMs, 1:13 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff and resident interview, the facility did not ensure dignity was maintained for 3 residents (R) (R305, R45, and R12) of 19 sampled residents who were served meals on disposable dishware. On 7/8/24, breakfast was served in Styrofoam containers because the kitchen was short staffed. During lunch service, staff were observed serving milk and coffee in Styrofoam cups. In addition, resident interviews indicated residents were provided with disposable utensils which made it difficult to cut food. Findings include: During the breakfast meal on 7/8/24, Surveyor observed staff serve breakfast in Styrofoam containers. On 7/8/24 at 10:11 AM, Surveyor noted R305's Cream of Wheat was served in a Styrofoam bowl with plastic cutlery. R305 stated the Cream of Wheat was cold On 7/8/24 at 10:32 AM, Surveyor observed several Styrofoam cups and plastic utensils in R45's garbage can. R45 stated sometimes R45 received plasticware with meals and staff served R45's coffee in a Styrofoam cup. R45 stated it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure protective placement was obtained for 1 resident (R) (R43) of 2 residents reviewed for guardianship. R43 had a legal guardian. The facility did not ensure R43 had court-ordered protective placement in the least restrictive environment at the facility. Findings include: Statute Chapter 55.03(4) states the law requires court-ordered protective placement for any resident admitted to a nursing home who has a legal guardian and whose nursing home stay exceeds ninety days. Between 7/8/24 and 7/10/24, Surveyor reviewed R43's medical record. R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified intellectual disability, senile degeneration of brain, bipolar disorder, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. R43's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/5/24, indicated R43 was severely cognitively impaired. R43 had a guardian as a decision maker. R43's medical record contained R43's Letters of Guardianship for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R45) of 1 sampled resident had a self-administration of medication assessment or a physician's order to self-administer medication. R45 did not have a self-administration of medication assessment that indicated R45 could safely and accurately self-administer medication. In addition, R45 did not have a physician's order to self-administer medication. Findings include: The facility's Policies and Procedures: Pharmacy Services Section II Medication Administration Policy (effective date: May 2018) Preparation and General Guidelines Section B. Administration 14 indicates: Residents can self-administer medications when specifically authorized by the attending physician and in accordance with procedures for self-administration of medication. On 7/9/24, Surveyor reviewed R45's medical record. R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and dementia. R45's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure an environment that was free from abuse for 1 resident (R) (R305) of 1 sampled resident. The facility did not protect R305's right to be free from verbal and mental abuse by R14. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property policy, dated 11/8/24, indicates: It is the policy of the facility that each resident will be free from abuse .Abuse is the willful infliction of .intimidation .or mental anguish .Abuse includes verbal abuse .Verbal abuse involves the use of speech, sound, writing, or gestures when communicating with residents or their families or within their hearing or sight, regardless of their age, ability to comprehensive, or disability .Mental abuse is the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes, or has the potential to cause, the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation .It is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency (SA) for 1 resident (R) (R305) of 1 sampled resident. The facility did not report an allegation of verbal abuse to the SA for R305. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property program, dated 11/8/24, indicates: It is the policy of this facility that all staff monitor residents and will know how to identify potential signs and symptoms of abuse. Occurrences, patterns and trends that may constitute abuse will be investigated .The facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse .are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse .to the Executive Director of the facility .Employees must always report any abuse or suspicion of abuse immediately to the Executive Director .If an incident or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the comprehensive care plan was implemented for 1 resident (R) (R50) of 19 sampled residents. R50's comprehensive care plan indicated R50 was at risk for developing pressure injuries. The facility did not implement R50's care plan intervention to ensure the prevention of skin breakdown. Findings include: The Facility Assessment, titled Bowel and Bladder Management, dated 8/10/23, indicates: The facility will put prevention measure in place to promote bowel and bladder health. Staff will adopt a person-centered interdisciplinary care plan and implement interventions/approaches to bowel and bladder management to meet the goals of the individual. Per Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A, the facility does not have a specific policy for repositioning. Between 7/8/24 through 7/10/24, Surveyor reviewed R50's medical record. R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, severe with agitation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff and resident interview, the facility did not ensure assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) was provided care in a timely and consistent manner for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 19 sampled residents. R2 waited 31 minutes for staff to provide care. In addition, staff turned R2's call light off prior to providing care. Findings include: 1. On 7/8/24, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 had a urinary catheter and was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/17/23, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R2 had intact cognition. On 7/8/24 at 10:27 AM, Surveyor interviewed R2. Surveyor noted R2's call light had previously been activated, but was off during the interview. R2 stated R2 had activated the call light because R2 wanted to get up. R2 stated staff had come in and R2 told staff what R2 wanted, but staff turned the call light off. R2 stated R2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 resident (R) (R14) of sampled 19 residents. An unsecured oxygen cylinder was stored in R14's room. Findings include: The facility's Safe Use of Oxygen policy, dated 11/8/23, indicates: .ii. If oxygen cylinders are in use, oxygen cylinders shall be secured in an upright position. If stored up upright, cylinders must be secured. On 7/8/24, Surveyor reviewed R14's medical record. R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). On 7/8/24 at 9:29 AM, Surveyor observed an unsecured oxygen cylinder with an oxygen regulator that was connected stored upright in R14's closet. On 7/9/24 at 12:43 PM, Surveyor interviewed RN-D who verified there was an unsecured oxygen tank in R14's closet and indicated the oxygen cylinder should be in a secured holder or secured in the closet. On 7/9/24 at 12:50 PM, Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #12 Bladder and Bowel Incontinence 07/08/24 01:07 PM Reports Friday & sunday: ostomy was not emptied in timely fashion. Ostomy bag overfilled & Leaked. Resident reports sitting in stool for several hours. Resident claims this has happened numerous times. Facility runs out of the appropriate ostomy bags, when wrong size is used she has issues with leakage. 07/10/24 09:36 AM Type: Nurse's Note Focus: Effective Date: 6/10/2024 01:04:00 Department: *Nursing Position: *Registered Nurse Created By: [NAME] Created Date : 6/10/2024 01:05:45 Record review: 6/10/2024 01:04 Nurse's Note Note Text: colostomy wafer & bag changed d/t blowout. Tolerated procedure well 07/10/24 11:19 AM Record review: No tasks for ostomy care. No regular documentation of ostomy care. No orders for ostomy dressing or care. 07/10/24 12:07 PM Interview with [NAME]: Has never had to change [NAME] ostomy, would check orders for ostomy dressing change. Typically ostomys are changed weekly. Has changed ostomy for another resident ([NAME]) as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R12) of 1 sampled resident received appropriate ileostomy care. R12's ileostomy care was not care planned which resulted in stool leakage from R12's ileostomy dressing. Findings include: From 7/8/24 to 7/10/24, Surveyor reviewed R12's medical record. R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a medical history which included a colectomy with end ileostomy. R12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/23/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R12 had intact cognition. On 7/8/24 at 1:07 PM, Surveyor interviewed R12 who stated R12's ileostomy collection bag was not emptied in a timely manner over the weekend (7/5/24 to 7/7/24) which caused the bag to overfill and leak multiple times. R12 also stated the facility does not consistently use the appropriate ostomy supplies and R12's ileostomy appliance leaked stool when the facility used ill-fitting ostomy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure use of bed rails was assessed and care planned for 1 resident (R) (R38) of 1 sampled resident. R38 had half rails on R38's bed. R38 did not have a risk assessment for the use of half rails. In addition, a risk versus benefits statement was signed by R38, however, R38 had an activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC). Findings include: The facility did not have a policy for the use of bed rails. On 7/9/24, Surveyor reviewed R38's medical record. R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, depression, and encounter for palliative care. R38's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/29/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15 which indicated R38 had severely impaired cognition. R38 had an APOAHC since 10/25/23. On 7/9/24 at 10:15 AM, Surveyor observed R38 in bed with half rails in place. On 7/9/24, Surveyor requested an assessment for R38's half…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a controlled drug was disposed of appropriately for 1 resident (R) (R22) of 15 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. Nurse Extern (NE)-O disposed of oxycodone (a schedule IV opioid medication used to treat severe pain) in the medication cart trash bin. In addition, NE-O did not document the destruction of the oxycodone and did not have a second witness present. Findings include: The facility's Disposal of Medication and Medication Related Supplies policy and procedure states: A. Unused, unwanted, and non-returnable medications should be removed from their storage area and secured until destroyed .C. Options to dispose of non-flushable prescription drugs include: .2. B. Mix drugs with an undesirable substance, such as cat litter or used coffee grounds .E. Medication destruction occurs only in the presence of at least two licensed healthcare professionals or according to regulation and applicable law. F. The licensed healthcare professional witnessing the destruction ensures that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility did not ensure medications were labeled and dated appropriately for 6 residents (R) (R38, R1, R32, R45, R19, and R9) of 15 sampled residents observed during medication administration. In addition, the facility also did not ensure medications in the second floor mediation refrigerator were dated when opened and disposed of when expired. During multiple observations of medication administration, Surveyor observed staff administer open and undated medications to R38, R1, R32, R45, R19, and R9. During an observation of medication administration, Nurse Extern (NE)-O administered the wrong dose of medication to R38 due to an incorrect label. In addition, NE-O administered a medication to R45 at the wrong time due to an incorrect label. The second floor medication refrigerator contained an open and undated multi-dose vial of octreotide acetate and 4 syringes of expired influenza vaccine. Findings include: The facility's Medication Storage in the Facility policy indicates: C. Certain medications or package types, such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY FACILITY Infection Control Sample one staff to verify compliance with requirements for educating and offering COVID-19 immunization (select one staff from the actual working schedules for all staff provided during entrance conference). 1. [NAME] CNA : INTV 0906- Educated on COVID w pamphlets. Received COVID vax x2. no boosters. Received info on IC in Relias like Donning & Doffing PPE & res who might be at risk Reviewed COVID Vax Pfizer 9/26/22 & 12/12/22 INTV DON 1244: in AM mtg will go over which res is on what precaution & when they come of it.no list of what res are on what precautions currently but will put together a list Sample three residents on transmission-based precautions (TBP) for purposes of determining compliance with infection prevention and control national standards, as well as resident care, screening, testing, and reporting. 1. [NAME] Per DON Not on Contact 2. [NAME] 3. [NAME] 4. [NAME] Sample five residents for influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID-19 immunizations review. 1. [NAME] R38 RM [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 21 sampled residents. The facility did not obtain detailed physician orders for R2's insulin and blood sugar monitoring. The facility also did not assess R2 for self-administration of insulin or accuchecks. In addition, the facility did not monitor R2's insulin use and blood sugar levels or monitor for signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) or hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). Findings include: The facility's undated Standard Diabetes Mellitus (a disease in which blood sugar levels are too high) Protocol indicates: .Patient has potential for fluctuating blood sugar and/or complications of diabetes mellitus .Monitor meal and fluid intake. Check blood sugars/labs as ordered. Monitor for compliance . On 4/10/24, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a fall was thoroughly investigated to determine root cause, implement appropriate interventions to prevent reoccurrence, or ensure the environment was as free from accident hazards as possible for 1 resident (R) (R7) of 3 sampled residents. On 3/19/24, a Hospice Registered Nurse (RN) documented that R7 had a witnessed fall. The facility did not complete a follow up investigation and did not implement safety precautions to prevent further reoccurrence. R7 had additional falls on 3/23/24 and 3/27/24. Findings include: The facility's Falls policy, with a review date of 6/24/22, indicates the facility has preventative measures put in place to reduce the occurrence of falls and the risk of injuries due to falls. This includes completion of a Fall Incident Report, care plan updates with identified interventions, and follow up assessments. On 4/10/24, Surveyor reviewed R7's medical record. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], received Hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure intravenous (IV) therapy treatment was administered by competent staff for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 1 sampled resident. On 11/18/23, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-D administered IV fluids to R1 through R1's implanted port; however, LPN-D was not qualified to administer IV fluids through an implanted port. Findings include: Wisconsin State Legislature Chapter N 6 titled Standards Of Practice For Registered Nurses And Licensed Practical Nurses indicates: .'Direct supervision' means immediate availability to continually coordinate, direct, and inspect at first hand the practice of another .In the performance of acts in basic patient situations, the LPN. shall, under the general supervision of an RN or the direction of a provider: (a) Accept only patient care assignments which the LPN is competent to perform .Performance of acts in complex patient situations. In the performance of acts in complex patient situations the LPN shall do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection. This had the potential to affect multiple residents residing in the facility. In addition, staff did not perform proper hand hygiene during the provision of care for 3 Residents (R) (R1, R5 and R4) of 8 sampled residents. The facility did not follow current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance for COVID-19 positive residents when they discontinued transmission-based precautions (TBP) (also referred to as isolation which indicates staff are to wear personal protective equipment (PPE), including a gown, gloves, N95 mask, and eye protection upon entering the room of a resident on TBP for COVID-19) before the recommended ten days for 9 residents (R9, R10, R11, R12, R1, R7, R4, R13, and R14) who resided on one unit. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-F did not consistently perform appropriate hand hygiene on 11/27/23 when CNA-F worked the unit on which R1, R5 and R4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure grievances were thoroughly investigated and resolved for 1 Resident (R) (R6) of 8 sampled residents. On 10/3/23, R6's significant other filed a grievance regarding call light response times and incontinence care. R6 denied R6 received follow up and resolution of the grievance. On 10/20/23, R6 filed a grievance regarding care received by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-I. R6 denied R6 received follow up and resolution of the grievance. Findings include: The facility's Grievance Policy and Procedure, with a revision date of 3/8/23, indicated the facility fosters an environment of prompt resolution. The policy stated an assigned manager will investigate the grievance and follow up with the individual filing the grievance within 5 business days unless further investigation is needed. The Grievance Policy and Procedure did not identify a Grievance Official. On 11/27/23, Surveyor reviewed the facility's grievance log. At 11:15 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care and treatment were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 Resident (R) (R2) of 12 sampled residents. R2 vomited on 11/10/23 and 11/11/23. The facility did not administer physician ordered anti-nausea medication. Findings include: On 11/27/23, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] on Hospice services with diagnoses including vascular dementia (a general term describing problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, memory and other thought processes caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to the brain). R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/29/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15 which indicated R2 had severe cognitive impairment. R2's Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) document, dated 5/16/19 and activated on 6/19/19, indicated R2's POAHC was responsible for R2's healthcare decisions. R2 passed away at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents was free from a medication error. On 7/11/23, R2's medication was found in R1's room. Later that day, R1 was sent to the emergency room (ER) for a change of condition. The facility did not conduct a thorough investigation to determine if a medication error occurred. Findings include: The facility's Medication Error policy, revised 6/13/23, contained the following information: 1. Any individual suspecting a potential medication error, shall report it to a Licensed Nurse. 2. Licensed Nurse is responsible for: a. completing an investigation, b. if confirmed, complete medication error assessment in Electronic Medical Record (EMR) 3. Medication errors will be reviewed through the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Process. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included left sided hemiplegia (paralysis) following a stroke, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and depression.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure sufficient staffing to meet residents' care needs. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. Thirteen of seventeen staffing shifts reviewed did not meet the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to resident staffing ratios outlined in the Facility Assessment which was updated in April 2023. Residents and staff interviewed expressed concerns with receiving and providing timely and complete care. Observations indicated call lights weren't answered timely, resident care was not provided timely and a resident who returned from the hospital was not attended to in a timely manner. Findings include: The Facility Assessment, dated April 2023, contained the following information: ~Staffing Plan: There are 2 Registered Nurses (RNs) and 1 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) scheduled for the AM/PM shift and 1 RN for the night (NOC) shift. One Medication Administration Assistant is scheduled for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Residents (R) (R12 and R29) of 21 residents were assessed as able to safely and accurately self-administer medication. R12 did not have a current self-administration of medication assessment for medications to be left at the bedside. R29 did not have a self-administration of medication assessment or a physician order to self administer medication. Findings include: The facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy, dated May 2018, contained the following information: In order to maintain residents' highest level of independence, residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents of the facility and there is a Prescriber's order to self-administer .C. For those residents who self-administer, the interdisciplinary team verifies the resident's ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure prompt resolution of a grievance for 1 Resident (R) (R47) of 21 residents. In addition, the grievance was not contained in the facility's grievance file. The facility did not document, investigate, and follow up with R47 or R47's Power of Attorney (POA) when the facility was notified of R47's missing hearing aid. Findings include: The facility's Policy and Procedure for Grievance, dated 3/8/23, contained the following information: I. Policy: Individual, guardian, and/or individual representative will be informed of the process to file a grievance or complaint and the facility's process to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances. II. Procedure: The facility fosters an environment of direct communication, prompt resolution, and continuous process improvement. Grievances may be brought to any staff member at any time orally, in writing, or made anonymously. Grievances will be forwarded to the designated Grievance Officer and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse for 1 Resident (R) (R6) of 21 sampled residents was reported to the State Agency (SA) in a timely manner. R6 reported an allegation of abuse to staff on 5/19/23. The allegation of abuse was not reported to the SA in a timely manner. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property Program, dated 12/1/22, contained the following information: The facility will ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the executive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 Resident (R) (R6) of 21 sampled residents. On 5/19/23, R6 reported an allegation of abuse. The allegation of abuse was not thoroughly investigated. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property Program, dated 12/1/22, contained the following information: Section A. Investigation of Abuse: When an incident or suspected incident of abuse is reported, the Executive or designee will investigate the incident with the assistance of appropriate personnel. The investigation will include: i. Who was involved. ii. Resident's statement. iv. Involved staff and witness statement of events. v. A description of the resident's behavior and environment at the time of the incident. vi. Injuries present including a resident assessment. ii. Observation of resident and staff behaviors during the investigation. Section F.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 Residents (R) (R2, R153, and R154) of 21 residents who required assistance of staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) were provided care in a timely and consistent manner. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had one documented shower and three skin evaluations since admission. R153 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had one documented shower since admission. R154 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had no documented showers since admission. Findings include: 1. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/11/23, indicated R2 required the assistance of two staff for bathing. On 5/23/23 at 9:16 AM, R2 stated to Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)-C during morning cares that R2 had not received a shower in two weeks and would like one. On 5/23/23 at 1:55 PM, Surveyor interviewed R2 regarding showers. R2 was unable to recall when R2 was last offered a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical and mental well-being for 1 Residents (R) (R102) of 21 sampled residents. R102's Admit/Readmit Screener, dated 5/19/23, did not contain documentation of a cyst R102 had surgically drained in the hospital prior to admission. R102 was not provided care for the cyst for three days after admission. Findings include: The facility's Policy and Procedure for Pressure Injury Prevention and Managing Skin Integrity contained the following information: .3. Skin Check Frequency: i. Upon admission or readmission 1. Skin check will be done upon admission and then done every shift for 72 hours after admission . 1. R102 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. R102 had an activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC). On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Residents (R) (R102 and R22) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries received the necessary care and services to promote healing. R102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a stage 2 pressure injury. A treatment order was not obtained until 5/22/23 when Wound Nurse Practitioner (NP)-Q assessed R102 and determined the pressure injury was unstageable. R22's medical record indicated R22 had a stage 3 pressure injury on the buttocks. During an observation of care, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)-C stated R22 had a foam dressing over the pressure injury which was not in accordance with R22's treatment order. Findings include: The facility's Policy and Procedure for Pressure Injury Prevention and Managing Skin Integrity contained the following information: .2. Identify Interventions and Care Plan .i. The care and intervention for any identified skin breakdown or wound is intended to prevent any further advancement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment was as free of accident hazards as possible for 2 Residents (R) (R102 and R29) of 21 sampled residents. R102 and R29 stored cigarettes and lighters in their rooms which was not in accordance with the facility's protocol. Findings include: The facility's Policy and Procedure for Individual Smoking contained the following information: Policy: Any individual requesting to smoke while residing in the facility will be assessed and interventions will be put in place for safety. 1. On 5/22/23 at 3:37 PM, Surveyor noted a strong odor of cigarette smoke outside R102's closed door and asked Registered Nurse (RN)-N to check on R102. RN-N knocked and entered R102's room and also noted an odor of cigarette smoke. When RN-N asked R102 about the odor, R102 denied smoking in R102's room. When RN-N asked if R102 had cigarettes and a lighter in R102's room, R102 stated R102 had cigarettes. When RN-N…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Residents (R19 and R16) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations were offered a pneumococcal vaccine. R19's medical record did not contain documentation that R19 was offered a 2nd pneumococcal vaccine. R16's medical record did not contain documentation that R16 was offered a pneumococcal vaccine. Findings include: The facility's Individual Immunizations policy, dated 7/22/22, contained the following information: 1a. Upon admission, the organization will verify the individual's immunization status, update Primary Care Provider (PCP) as indicated, and administer immunizations as ordered. B. Individual will be offered immunizations based upon the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations and guidelines and as prescribed by their PCP. 2a. Vaccination Information Sheet (VIS) will be provided and reviewed with individuals including benefits, risks, and potential side effects associated with vaccination. 3b. Immunization…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-03-27 · tag F0846 — widespread
    Have policies and procedures ensuring the administrator's responsibilities for facility closure are completed successfully.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, the facility did not have policies and procedures in place to use in the case of a facility closure. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not have policies and procedures to address a facility closure. Findings include: On 3/27/25 at 12:53 PM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A who indicated the facility would follow state regulations in the event of a closure. NHA-A indicated the facility does not have a written policy to address a facility closure.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$9,113 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-03-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ILLUMINUS — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 51.8+1.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LUTHERAN HOMES AND HEALTH SERVICES, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 02/09/2005
MARKS, JULIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/16/2025
SCHLEIF, TERRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
SUHS, KIMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
MAUTHE, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2016
ILLUMINUS INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2016
KAYMEN, STANLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2023
WEBER, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 33%Medicare 6%Other / private 61%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$428per resident / day
operating cost
$12,997per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$338per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525655. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next