Marquardt Memorial Manor
1020 Hill St, Watertown, WI 53098 · Non profit - Corporation · 140 certified beds · (920) 261-0400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $26,706 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-10)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.3% | 16.1% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 5.1% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.7% | 2.1% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.1% | 2.7% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 5.7% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.1% | 18.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.0% | 16.9% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.9% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.0% | 5.0% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.4% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.2% | 15.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.0% | 82.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.1% | 23.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.1% | 15.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.91 | 1.66 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.75 | 2.29 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 173 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.5%CMS range 39.9–53.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.8%CMS range 6.0–12.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.5–11.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.84 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 73.3 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 67 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 of 3 residents (R3 and R1) reviewed for accidents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. R3 is being cited at severity level 3 (actual harm). R3 experienced a fall with major injury. Surveyor observed fall interventions not in place. The facility did not complete a root cause analysis for 12 falls and did not implement appropriate interventions for R1's falls. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Falls, reviewed 12/5/24, states, in part; .Prevention measures are put in place to reduce the occurrence of falls and risk of injury from falls .c. A licensed nurse will determine the individuals' risk for falls and individualized care needs. If the individual is at risk for falls, then create a falls care plan .b. The care plan will be updated with an identified intervention . Example 1: R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, diabetes, anxiety disorder, adult failure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries and do not develop pressure injuries unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable for 1 of 3 (R24) residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R24 had a Controlled Ankle Movement (CAM) boot applied for an ankle fracture. The facility did not implement interventions to remove the boot and assess her skin. R24 developed unstageable pressure injuries to her left heel and top of foot. Findings include: R24 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include End Stage Renal Disease, dependence on renal dialysis, Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), absence of left leg below knee, osteomyelitis, Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, chronic Congestive Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation, Osteoporosis. The facility Pressure Injury…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 (R10 and R222) of 5 residents reviewed. *R10 had an unwitnessed fall on 11/25/2023 and did not have neurological checks completed as scheduled per the facility policy. R10's Fall Risk Care Plan was not updated after R10's fall on 11/25/2023. On 1/19/2024, R10 was transferred by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-W with a Sara Steady (an assistive device used for transferring residents). CNA-W did not have assistance from another staff member when R10's care plan documented 2 assist should be used with transferring R10. R10 fell from the Sara Steady and fractured R10's left tibia. R10 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 1/22/2024 and required a Closed reduction of R10's left leg while under sedation. *R222 had a fall on 6/6/2024 that the facility did not thoroughly investigate. Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Falls, with a review date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are thoroughly investigated for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (R1 & R3).R1 reported verbally and in writing an allegation of neglect. The facility did not complete a thorough investigation of the allegation.CNA F (Certified Nursing Assistant) and CNA E heard R3 screaming from behind a closed door. When they entered they saw CNA H transferring R3 using a hoyer lift alone, without a second staff member. The facility did not complete a thorough investigation that included an interview by R3, interview with other residents, and skin assessments of non-interviewable residents.Evidenced by:Facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, reviewed 2/11/26, includes: It is the policy of the facility that each resident will be free from abuse. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, . intimidation, or punishment. includes verbal abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure the resident environment remains as free of accidents/hazards as is possible for 2 of 3 sampled residents (R1, R3) reviewed for accidents/hazards.CNA H (Certified Nursing Assistant) transferred R1 and R3 alone using a hoyer lift, while the facility policy is to have 2 staff when using the hoyer lift.Evidenced by:Facility policy titled Full Body Lift, undated, includes: . At all times full body lifts are two staff transfers.CNA D's Witness Statement, dated 4/5/26, includes:. Upon arrival I observed R1 is on the phone talking with her daughter; visibly upset and crying. CNA E was also present in the room. After ending the call, R1 explained the situation regarding an incident involving CNA H, R1 reported that CNA H used a hoyer lift with an incorrect sling size and applied the sling improperly. She also stated that during care, CNA H accidentally tipped over a bedpan containing urine and feces onto the bed. Although CNA H cleaned the bed afterward, R1 reported that her back was not cleaned following the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to 72 of 73 residents residing in the facility (1 resident was fed via tube). The microwave in the main kitchen was not in a clean condition. Staff did not test the water temperature of the sanitizing solution in the sanitizer buckets or test the sanitization level in the three-compartment sink per manufacturer's recommendations. Staff did not complete appropriate hand hygiene and safe food handling practices while serving food. Findings include: On 2/23/26 at 10:21 AM, Surveyor completed an initial tour of the kitchen with Food Services Director (FSD)-L and Dietary Manager (DM)-M who stated the facility follows the Wisconsin Food Code. Microwave Cleanliness: The Wisconsin Food Code documents at 4-602.12 Cooking and Baking Equipment: (A) The food-contact surfaces of cooking and baking equipment shall be cleaned at least every 24 hours .(B) The cavities and door seals of microwave ovens shall be cleaned at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff, resident, and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 5 residents (R) (R11, R36, R13, R39, and R80) of 6 sampled residents received the proper notice of transfer, reason for transfer, location of transfer, appeal rights, name and address (mailing and email) with telephone number of the office of the state long-term care Ombudsman plus notification of discharge/transfer to the Ombudsman. In addition, the facility did not ensure residents received written information on the duration of the bed hold policy, the reserve bed payment policy, and the right to return to the facility.R11 was transferred to the hospital on 1/24/26. R11 was not provided with a written bed hold or transfer notice. R36 was transferred to the hospital on 1/27/26. R36 was not provided with a written bed hold or transfer notice. R13 was transferred to the hospital on 1/16/26. R13's representative was not provided with a written bed hold or transfer notice.R39 was transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with the facility's policy. Three of 6 medication carts were observed unlocked and unattended. In addition, 2 of 6 medication carts and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms contained expired medication and medical supplies. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 73 residents residing in the facility. Medication carts on the 400 and 200 wings were unlocked and unattended. Medication carts and the medication storage room on the 200 and 400 wings contained expired medication and medical supplies. Findings include: The facility's Medication Storage policy, dated 5/2018, indicates: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medication .B. Only licensed nurses, pharmacy personnel, and those lawfully…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not incorporate recommendations from a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II and PASRR evaluation report into the plan of care for 1 resident (R) (R68) of 5 sampled residents . R68's PASRR Level II Screen indicated R68 required specialized services. A PASRR evaluation stated staff should focus on sensory stimulation activities, socialization, and recreational opportunities to benefit R68's social development. An activities note for R68 indicated R68 should be provided with fidget objects and sensory items. On 2/23/26, 2/24/26, and 2/25/26, R68 was observed in R68's room with the lights down and blinds closed. R68 did not have any sensory stimulation objects and was not invited to any activities during that time period.Findings include:From 2/23/26 to 2/25/26, Surveyor reviewed R68's medical record. R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including spastic quadriplegia cerebral palsy, epilepsy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for 2 residents (R) (R63 and R12) of 20 sampled residents. R63 had orders for gastrostomy (G)-tube management for seizure rescue medication administration. R63's care plan did not include G-tube care. R12 had an order for the use of continuous oxygen to maintain optimal oxygen saturation rates. R12's care plan did not indicate R12 used continuous oxygen. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure for Individual Care Plan Conferences, dated 2/21/24, indicates: A written care plan is developed and maintained directing a course of comprehensive care specific to the individual's needs from all appropriate disciplines and the individual's primary care provider . 1. On 2/24/26, Surveyor reviewed R63's medical record. R63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hemiplegia, Arnold Chiari Syndrome, epilepsy, dysphagia, and depression. R63's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure timely incontinence care was provided for 1 resident (R) (R68) of 4 sampled residents.R68's care plan indicated R68 should be checked and changed every 2 to 3 hours or as needed. On 2/24/26, staff did not check and change R68 for 3 hours and 21 minutes. R68 was in a brief that had soaked through to a Chux pad underneath R68 and R68's room smelled of urine. Findings include: The facility's undated Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Protocol indicates: Toileting should be offered every 2 to 3 hours and incontinence care should be provided as needed. On 2/24/26, Surveyor reviewed R68's medical record. R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including spastic quadriplegia cerebral palsy, epilepsy, severe intellectual disability, cachexia, and weakness. R68's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/13/26, indicated R68 had severe cognitive impairment, was always incontinent of bladder and bowel, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a gastrostomy (G)-tube was flushed as ordered for 1 resident (R) (R63) of sampled 2 residents. R63 had a G-tube to provide rescue medication for seizures. R63 had an order to flush the G-tube for patency. R63's G-tube was not flushed in accordance with the order. Findings include: The facility's General Guidelines for Administering Medication via Enteral Tube policy, dated 5/2018, indicates: The facility assures the safe and effective administration of enteral formula and medication via enteral tubes .D. Enteral tubes are flushed with at least 15 milliliters (ml) of purified or sterile water before administering medication, between each medication, and after all medications have been administered . On 2/24/26, Surveyor reviewed R63's medical record. R63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hemiplegia, Arnold Chiari Syndrome, epilepsy, dysphagia, and depression. R63's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure monitoring interventions for high-risk medications were in place for 1 resident (R) (R7) of 9 sampled residents.R7 was prescribed morphine sulfate (an opioid medication) for pain and gabapentin (an anticonvulsant medication) for nerve pain. Staff did not monitor R7 for adverse reactions or side effects of the high-risk medications.Findings include: The facility's Miscellaneous Special Situations policy, dated May 2018, indicates: Box warning medications - Many medications used by residents in the nursing home may carry a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-issued box warning. The box warning is a serious type of warning the FDA can require on medication labeling and is important to the health and safety of prescription drug consumers. Nursing facility staff, prescribers, and pharmacists should be familiar with box warnings for any medication used for a nursing home resident and assure the medications are used and monitored appropriately .C.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 resident (R) (R68) of 6 sampled residents.During the provision of incontinence care for R68, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-F did not complete hand hygiene after removing soiled gloves.During the provision of incontinence care for R68, CNA-G did not wear a gown, appropriately change gloves, or complete hand hygiene after removing soiled gloves. Findings include: The facility's Hand Hygiene policy, revised 12/5/24, indicates: Hand hygiene should be completed before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same resident, after contact with bodily fluids, and immediately after glove removal. The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy, revised 2/6/25, indicates: For residents for whom EBP is indicated, a gown and gloves should be worn when completing high-contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff, resident, and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure grievances were thoroughly investigated and resolved for 3 residents (R) (R1, R4, and R5) of 4 sampled residents.Family Member (FM)-I filed a grievance on behalf of R1 on 1/7/26 that included concerns about a missed appointment, wound care, and assistance with cares. The facility did not investigate or provide resolution for the grievance. R4 reported in September 2025 that R4 did not receive scheduled showers. The facility did not document, investigate, or provide resolution for the grienvance.R5 reported to staff that Registered Nurse (RN)-R swore at R5. Staff reported to the concern to a supervisor; however, the facility did not file a grievance or follow-up on the concern. Findings include: The facility's Policy and Procedure for Grievances indicates: .The facility fosters an environment of direct communication, prompt resolution, and continuous process improvement. Grievances may be brought to any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff, resident, and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not ensure scheduled showers/baths were provided for 3 residents (R) (R4, R1, and R3) of 13 sampled residents.R4 was scheduled for a weekly shower on Tuesday evening. R4 did not receive showers as scheduled.R1 did not receive a shower while at the facility because the facility did not have a functioning bariatric shower chair.R3 did not receive weekly showers as scheduled. In addition, R3's preference to receive a shower instead of a bed bath was not consistently honored. The facility's undated Standard Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Protocol indicates: ADLS: .bathing .Individual will perform ADLs .with or without staff assist. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA): Offer individual choices with care routines .Offer weekly bath or shower per individual preference . 1. On 2/4/26, Surveyor reviewed R4's medical record. R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary care and services to prevent pressure injuries from developing and/or promote healing for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents.R1 had an unstageable deep tissue injury that was treated without a physician order. In addition, R1 had a stage 2 pressure injury that was not identified in the facility and was discovered while R1 was at a medical appointment. Findings include: The facility's Pressure Injury Prevention and Managing Skin Integrity policy and procedure, dated 5/8/25, indicates: Prevention measures are put in place to reduce the occurrence of pressure injuries .1. Risk Assessment: a. Upon admission: Braden Scale will be completed to evaluate individual's risk for developing a pressure injury at admission, and weekly for four weeks for all new admissions. b. Re-evaluation: Braden Scale will be completed upon change of condition and quarterly. c. Based on the individual's Braden Scale score, pressure reduction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R1) of 1 sampled resident received timely placement of a suprapubic catheter (a tube inserted through a small incision in the lower abdomen directly into the bladder to drain urine). R1 did not have transportation from the facility to a medical appointment on 12/31/25 that was scheduled to remove R1's indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted through the urethra into the bladder to continuously drain urine into an external bag) and replace it with a suprapubic catheter. R1 scheduled a new appointment for 1/5/26 for placement of the suprapubic catheter. Findings include: On 2/2/26, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including complete paraplegia, diabetes mellitus type 2, anxiety, obesity class 3, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (loss of normal bladder control due to nerve damage), and neurogenic bowel. R1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R5) of 3 sampled residents received oxygen therapy.R5's oxygen tubing was changed on 1/9/26. Following the change, staff did not turn R5's oxygen back on. As a result, R5 was without supplemental oxygen for approximately 6 hours. Findings include:The facility's undated Standard Respiratory Protocol indicates: Problem: Impaired or potential impairment of gas exchange related to chronic respiratory disease. Goal: Individual will have an effective respiratory rate, depth, and rhythm. Registered Nurse: .Apply oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) as ordered.On 2/4/26, Surveyor reviewed R5's medical record. R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, alveolar hypoventilation, peripheral vascular disease, history of pulmonary embolism, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. R5's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an opportunity to create a Power of Attorney (POA) document or a document that designated an alternate decision maker in the case of incapacity was provided for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 5 sampled residents.The facility did not offer R1 an opportunity to create a POA document or any document to designate a decision maker if R1 became incapacitated.Findings include:The facility's Individual Advanced Care Planning policy, dated 2/21/24, indicates: .A. Upon admission: .2. Per the Patient Self Determination Act, information about Wisconsin advanced health care directives will be provided to individuals upon their admission to the facility .B. Upon admission/re-admission, change in condition, and at care conferences: 1. Advanced care planning will be discussed and/or verified. 2. The resources available in the skilled nursing facility to treat symptoms and conditions will be discussed as appropriate.On 10/6/25, Surveyor reviewed R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency (SA) for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 1 sampled resident. R1 reported to staff that another staff call R1 stupid. The allegation of abuse was not reported to the SA.Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Program policy indicates: It is the poliy of the facility that each resident will be free from abuse .The Executive Director or designee will report abuse to the State Agency per state and federal requirements .G. Reporting and Response: .The facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse .are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 1 sampled resident observed during the provision of care. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-D did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during wound care for R1. In addition, LPN-C did not complete proper hand hygiene or ensure a treatment cart and supplies were free from infectious agents during and after the provision of wound care. Findings include: The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy and procedure, dated 2/6/25, indicates: The organization will promote decreased transmission of Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC)-targeted and epidemiologically important multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) by utilizing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) .a. The infection Prevention and Control Program…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for transmission-based precautions. R4 had a sign posted on his door that he was under isolation for droplet precautions; however, a staff member entered R4's room without following the droplet precaution protocol, wearing the appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) or performing hand hygiene per standards of practice. This is evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 6/14/17, with last review date of 5/8/25, states, in part: Policy: To prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection, the organization will follow the Infection Prevention and Control Program procedures below. Procedure: 1. Prevention and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the facility wide assessment developed by the facility included all relevant details to ensure the facility provided care and services to residents to meet their individual needs within the facility's identified resources. This has the potential to affect 9 residents (R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, and R13) currently residing in the facility with a substance use disorder (SUD) diagnosis. The facility assessment must reflect the resident population and resources needed to care for this population. Nine residents had a diagnosis of SUD however the facility did not address the resources needed to care for these residents. R5 has a diagnosis of alcohol abuse. R6 has a diagnosis of alochol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia. R7 has a diagnosis of alochol abuse. R8 has a diagnosis of alcohol dependence. R9 has a diagnosis of alcohol dependence. R10 has a diagnosis of alcohol dependence. R11 has a diagnosis of alcohol abuse. R12 has a diagnosis of alcohol abuse. R13 has a diagnosis of cannabis use. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide behavioral health services to ensure a resident received the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. The facility did not create a comprehensive assessment and plan of care to address substance use disorder (SUD) for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R4, and R5) reviewed for SUDs. R1 had cocaine use, regularly drank alcohol while in the facility and had a history of cannabis use. R1 did not have an assessment or comprehensive person-centered care plan for R1's SUD and did not have timely interventions for R1's SUD. R5 regularly drank alcohol while in the facility and did not have a care plan with interventions for SUD. R4 did not have a care plan in place for his diagnosis of alcohol use. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan, dated [DATE], states in full: I. Policy: The Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan will reflect the individual's needs and preferences to facilitate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility did not ensure food was prepared and served in a sanitary manner. -Proper dishwashing rinse cycle temperatures were not obtained on the dish washing machine gauge or the manual gauge that was run though the dishwashing machine. There was no evidence or observations that sanitizing temperature was reached by the dishmachine and the dishmachine was observed to not properly sanitize the dishware through the high temperature cycle. -Cook-R was observed grabbing ready to eat food with gloved hands, after touching non-sanitized food surfaces, and placing the ready to eat food on plates for residents to eat. [NAME] was observed not changing gloves and washing hands after touching non-sanitized food surfaces. This practice has the potential to affect 76 of 76 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1.) The Facility Policy and Procedure titled, Manual Dishwashing with no dates, documents: Policy: All flatware, serving dishes, and Cookware will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure 1 out of 1 residents ( R27) reviewed for the use of a physical restraint, conducted a comprehensive assessment and developed a plan of care for the continued use of the physical restraint. R27 has an abdominal binder in place at all times which cannot be removed easily by R27 and restricts R27's freedom of movement or normal access to her body. The facility did not provide evidence that the use of the abdominal restraint is the least restrictive alternative and did not ensure that it was used for the least amount of time and did not document on-going re-evaluation of the need for the abdominal binder. Findings include: R27 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Spastic Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy (CP), Developmental Disorder of speech and language, severe intellectual disabilities, and Dysphasia. R27 has a gastronomy tube (g-tube) in place to assist in meeting nutritional needs because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with a primary diagnosis of alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia; and other diagnoses which include, in part, encounter for palliative care, epilepsy, and anxiety disorder. R35's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 9/9/24 indicated R35 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13 (fully intact memory). R35 makes self understood and understands others. No behaviors were noted during the look back period. R35's upper extremity has an impairment on one side, the lower extremities have no impairment. R35 is always continent of bowel and bladder. R35 has the following care plan for falls: The resident is Moderate risk for falls r/t Deconditioning, Gait/balance problems, Dementia, Hx falls. Date Initiated: 05/01/2023 Revision on: 07/24/2023 Goal: o Risk of falls/falls with injury will be minimized Date Initiated: 05/01/2023 Revision on: 09/03/2024 Target Date: 12/08/2024 Interventions: o…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility did not ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, including the ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility for 1 of 1 (R24) residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility did not implement interventions to assess and document care of R24's Arteriorvenous (AV) fistula including auscultation/palpation of the AV fistula (pulse, bruit and thrill) to assure adequate blood flow. Findings include: R24 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include End Stage Renal Disease, dependence on renal dialysis, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Chronic Congestive Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation. The facility Dialysis Policy and Procedure reviewed 7/13/21 documents (in part) .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure medical records contained documentation related to Pneumococcal immunizations for 1 (R67) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. R67's medical record does not contain any documentation as to whether R67 was offered, received, or declined the Pneumococcal immunization. Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Infection Control-Individual Immunizations, with a review date of 9/20/2023, documents, in part: Prophylactic immunizations will be offered to individuals to promote the absence of Health Care Acquired Infections . Upon admission, the organization will verify the individual's immunization status, update Primary Care Provider (PCP) as indicated and administer immunizations as ordered. Individual will be offered immunizations based upon the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations and guidelines and as prescribed by their PCP. Other prophylactic treatments or immunizations will be offered to individuals per medical director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure medical records contained documentation related to COVID-19 immunizations for 1 (R67) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. R67's medical record does not contain any documentation as to whether R67 was offered, received, or declined the COVID-19 immunization. Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Infection Control-Individual Immunizations, with a review date of 9/20/2023, documents, in part: Prophylactic immunizations will be offered to individuals to promote the absence of Health Care Acquired Infections . Upon admission, the organization will verify the individual's immunization status, update Primary Care Provider (PCP) as indicated and administer immunizations as ordered. Individual will be offered immunizations based upon the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations and guidelines and as prescribed by their PCP. Other prophylactic treatments or immunizations will be offered to individuals per medical director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, review of facility food temperature logs, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure potentially hazardous foods (PHF) such as meat, eggs and dairy were tested for safe food temperatures prior to distribution to the residents. Specifically, hot, and cold food temperatures were not taken on 69 meals during a 90-day period. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the health of 80 of 83 residents at the facility. Findings include: Review of food temperature logs provided by the facility dated 11/12/23 through 02/19/24 revealed food temperatures had not been taken for 69 meals, primarily the dinner meal. The food temperatures had not been taken at breakfast, lunch, or dinner on nine days during that period. During an interview on 02/20/24 at 11:00 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated the facility kitchen cooks breakfast; however, the lunch and dinner meals were cooked offsite and transported to the facility for distribution. The DM stated the food was placed in metal containers, put into heated boxes, and transported to the facility kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of the facility's incident investigation report, the facility failed to protect one of 16 sampled residents' (Resident (R) 1) right to be free from neglect when the facility failed to provide timely and appropriate toileting services. Specifically, R1 was told to urinate in her brief and was left on the bedpan for one hour which resulted in R1 being neglected. Findings include: Review of R1's undated admission Record, located in the resident's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R1 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 11/23/23. admission diagnoses included muscle weakness, Parkinson's' disease, and osteoarthritis. Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/21/23 indicated R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R1 was cognitively intact. R1 was dependent on staff for bed mobility and toileting and had no rejection of care behavior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect all 86 residents. Surveyor observed dishwasher temperature logs not meeting manufacture requirement for sanitation. The facility did not have a practice to monitor and report findings of the dishwasher temperature logs. Surveyor observed the kitchen sink, dishwashing sink, and floors to be not cleaned properly; in addition to cobwebs with dead bugs and peeling paint, therefore causing an unsanitary environment. Surveyor observed staff without hairnets and hairnets not worn properly. This is evidenced by: Example 1 The Wisconsin Food Code 2022 documents at section 4-501.110 Mechanical Ware washing Equipment, Wash Solution Temperature. (A) The temperature of the wash solution in spray type ware washers that use hot water to sanitize may not be less than: (1) For a stationary rack, single temperature machine, 74°C (165°F); (2) For a stationary rack, dual temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 Residents (R2) of 11 residents reviewed. R2 reported an allegation of abuse on 9/21/23 and 9/22/23. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegations reported to rule out abuse. Findings include: The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of resident Property last reviewed on 11/8/23 included the following: .It is the policy of this facility that reports of abuse are promptly and thoroughly investigated through the organization's Quality Assurance Program Improvement (QAPI) incident report and investigation process. The investigation is the process used to try to determine what happened. The designed facility personnel will begin investigation immediately. A root cause investigation and analysis will be completed. The information gathered is given to administration.The investigation will include who was involved, resident statements, resident roommate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent accidents from occurring for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (R7) for 2 assist with full body lifts and 1 of 3 (R4) reviewed for wandering. R7 transfer status is care planned as two-assist with full body lift. R7 reported to surveyor that when she is transferred it is completed by Family Member J and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). R4 entered R6's room while she was awake in bed and was touching her legs below the knee and shin area. R6 stated R4 would not leave her room and he made her feel creepy. R4 has a history of wandering and was wandering repeatedly prior to this incident. R4's care plan does not reflect wandering and interventions. This is evidenced by the facility policy Safe Individual Handling Program, with a review date of 6/13/23, indicates, in part: Policy: The organization will adopt the Safe Individual Handling Program as outlined below. Procedure: .B. Care Plan. 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 78 of 80 residents who resided in the facility (two residents received nutrition exclusively via tube feeding). Staff did not test Quaternary sanitizing solution per manufacturer's instructions. The facility did not ensure food-contact and non-food contact equipment was clean and dry for storage or use. The facility did not have a practice to monitor and document dishwashing wash and rinse cycle temperatures Findings include: Dietary Manager (DM)-J stated the facility followed the Wisconsin Food Code 2022. 1. Sanitizing Solution A package insert for Quaternary test strips used by the facility indicated the sanitizing solution should be between 65 and 75 degrees Fahrenheit (F) at the time of testing. Eco Lab instructions: For sanitization of equipment in food processing plants, restaurants, remove gross food particles and excess soil by a pre-flush or pre-scrape, wash with a good detergent or compatible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 Residents (R26, R57, R58 and R67) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations were offered a pneumococcal vaccine. R26's medical record did not contain documentation that R26 was offered or declined a pneumococcal vaccination. R57's medical record did not contain documentation that R57 was offered or declined the Prevnar 20 vaccine. R58's medical record did not contain documentation that R58 was offered or declined a pneumococcal vaccination. R67's medical record did not contain documentation that R67 was offered or declined the Prevnar 20 vaccine. Findings include: The facility's Individual Immunizations policy, dated 7/22/22, contained the following information: 1a. Upon admission, the organization will verify the individual's immunization status, update Primary Care Provider (PCP) as indicated, and administer immunizations as ordered. b. Individual will be offered immunizations based upon the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 residents (R) (R7, R26, R58 and R67) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations were provided education regarding the risks and benefits of COVID-19 immunization and either received or did not receive the vaccine due to medical contraindications or refusal. R7 did not receive a COVID-19 vaccine. R7's medical record did not indicate the facility provided education regarding the risks and benefits of the vaccine, or that R7 was not immunized due to medical contraindications or refusal. R26 did not receive a COVID-19 vaccine. R26's medical record did not indicate the facility provided education regarding the risks and benefits of the vaccine, or that R26 was not immunized due to medical contraindications or refusal. R58 did not receive a COVID-19 vaccine. R58's medical record did not indicate the facility provided education regarding the risks and benefits of the vaccine, or that R58 was not immunized due to medical contraindications or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not thoroughly investigate and resolve a grievance for 1 Resident (R) (R180) of 21 sampled residents. On 6/17/23, R180 reported care concerns to staff. Staff did not follow the facility's grievance process. R180's grievance was not thoroughly investigated or resolved. Findings include: An undated Receipt of Grievance form was provided to Surveyor as the facility's policy and contained the following information: This guide will be used to take notes through-out the investigation of a grievance. It will become the source of information used to complete a report for the Quality Assurance Committee .It was generated for the sole purpose of improving the quality of services provided to our residents, patients, and clients. The form contained sections that included: Describe concern using factual terms; Investigation Findings; Resolution Description; and Resident/Representative Update Given. On 6/26/23, Surveyor reviewed R180's medical record.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident suspected of having a mental illness and/or intellectual/developmental disability was screened through the Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II process to determine if nursing home placement was appropriate and if specialized services were required for 2 Residents (R) (R26 and R71) of 21 sampled residents. The facility did not complete a PASRR Level II Screen for R26. The facility did not complete a PASRR Level II Screen for R71. Findings include: The State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services form F-22191 titled Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screen, dated 7/2017, contains the following information: Under these sections, nursing facilities must not admit any new resident who is suspected of having a serious mental illness or a developmental disability unless the State mental health authority/State developmental disability authority or designee has evaluated the person and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R26) of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) was provided AM and PM cares. R26 was not provided AM and PM cares daily which caused discomfort to R26's groin and buttocks. Findings include: In accordance with standard of care for personal hygiene of a dependent resident. [NAME], S., Fuzy, J., & [NAME], S. (2018). Heartman's Nursing Assistant Care long-term care and home care includes: CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) may provide help with personal care and assist residents daily with these tasks. Personal care provides an opportunity for the CNA to observe a resident's skin . On 6/27/23, Surveyor reviewed R26's medical record. R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include history of urinary tract infection (UTI), pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 2, moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) to bilateral buttocks, urinary retention with a chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure care and treatment was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 Resident (R) (R26) of 4 sampled residents. R26 was admitted to the facility with skin damage and was not provided treatment according to physician orders. Findings include: From 6/26/23 through 6/29/23, Surveyor reviewed R26's medical record. R26 had diagnoses to include history of urinary tract infection (UTI) (last infection 5/9/23), pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 2, moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) to bilateral buttocks, urinary retention with a chronic indwelling catheter, and diabetes. R26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/8/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R26 did not have cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated R26 had no unhealed pressure injuries. R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the provision of care and treatment to prevent the development or worsening of pressure injuries for 1 Resident (R) (R35) of 7 sampled residents. R35's had a facility-acquired unstageable pressure injury on the right heel. R35 was observed in bed on multiple occasions with both heels in direct contact with the mattress. Findings include: The facility's Pressure Injury Prevention and Managing Skin Integrity policy, dated 6/24/22, contained the following information: 2. Identify Interventions and Care Plan, a. Identify Interventions i. The care and intervention for any identified skin breakdown or wound is intended to prevent any further advancement of the wound or additional skin breakdown . R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and muscle weakness. R35's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/14/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. On 6/28/23, Surveyor reviewed R47's medical record. R47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include history of chronic urinary tract infection, urinary incontinence and indwelling catheter for wound healing. R47's most recent UTI was in May of 2023. On 6/28/23 at 9:15 AM, Surveyor observed CNA-M and CNA-T perform catheter care for R47. Prior to emptying R47's drainage bag, CNA-M placed the drainage bag on the floor without a protective barrier and did not use an alcohol wipe to disinfect the drainage spout before or after emptying the urine into a graduated cylinder. CNA-M then placed the drainage bag in a basin. CNA-M disposed of the urine in the sink and rinsed the cylinder. On 6/28/23, Surveyor interviewed CNA-T who verified R47's drainage bag was placed on the floor without a protective barrier. CNA-T stated the drainage bag contained a broken hook and CNA-T was unable to hook the bag on R47's bed. On 6/28/23 at 11:39 AM, Surveyor interviewed NM-C who verified drainage bags should not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 1 sampled resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding. R1's enteral feed bag was not changed after 24 hours as ordered. In addition, the enteral nutrition (EN) formula was labeled Jevity after R1's tube feeding (TF) order was changed to Glucerna. Findings include: The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Enteral Nutrition Practice Recommendations (Volume 41, Issue 1, January 2017, 15-103) indicates a label should be affixed to all enteral nutrition delivery systems and contains the following information: Include all the critical elements of the EN order on the EN label: patient identifiers, formula type, enteral delivery site (route and access), administration method and type, and volume and frequency of water flushes. Standardize the labels for all EN formula containers, bags, or syringes to include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$26,706 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $26,706 — penalty dated 2025-04-10
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-09 for 15 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ILLUMINUS — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARQUARDT VILLAGE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/12/2011 |
| DETTMAN, SCOTT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 11/29/2021 |
| FISCHER, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 11/25/2019 |
| MEIDENBAUER, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 11/29/2021 |
| MARKS, JULIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/25/2025 |
| MAUTHE, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/10/2010 |
| ILLUMINUS INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| JOHNSON, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/25/2025 |
| SULLIVAN, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/25/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525543. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.