Manzanita Healthcare Center
5318 Manzanita Avenue, Carmichael, CA 95608 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (916) 331-8513 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 0.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.8% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.7% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 195 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 76.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.87 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.6%CMS range 53.3–67.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.5%CMS range 8.1–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 76.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 78.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.1%CMS range 5.3–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 94.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.72 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.93 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) did not develop a pressure injury or pressure sore (PI, a localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) when they failed to follow and implement preventative interventions that included to turn and re-position frequently, monitor and assess for signs of skin breakdown, and, to use pressure relieving devices(s) for her chair and bed as outlined in their Care Plan Report (CP), titled Skin integrity care plan and Skin assessment and prevention of pressure injuries policy and procedures (P&P). This failure resulted in Resident 1 to have developed facility acquired pressure injuries (PI that developed while a resident in the facility due to lack of assessment and treatment) and had the potential to have caused complications such as pain and sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection). Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, (AR),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a manner to maintain nutritive value for a census of 94 residents, when the carrots' recipe was not followed. This failure decreased the facility's potential to maintain the nutritive value of the food being served.Findings:A review of Resident 58's admission Record, indicated Resident 58 was admitted to the facility in 2025.A review of Resident 58's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 3/5/26, indicated Resident 58 had no memory impairment.A review of Resident 50's admission Record, indicated Resident 50 was admitted to the facility in 2026.A review of Resident 50's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 50 had no memory impairment.A review of Resident 119's admission Record, indicated Resident 119 was admitted to the facility in 2026. A review of Resident 119's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 119 had no memory impairment.During an interview on 4/12/26 at 9:01 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner for a census of 94 residents, when:1. Opened and expired food items were available for use and not labeled; and2. The dishwasher's temperature log for April 2026 had no temperature and chlorine monitoring for breakfast and lunch for two days.These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses among vulnerable residents.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/12/26 at 8:23 a.m. with [NAME] 1 in the walk-in refrigerator, the following items were stored opened without labeling: a pancake waffle syrup, almond extract bottles, whipped cream bag and a browning seasoning sauce bottle. A lime juice bottle with expiration date 4/9/26 and two thickened lemon flavor water containers with best by date 12/5/25 and 2/25/26 were also found. [NAME] 1 confirmed the opened food items were not labeled and stated it should have been labeled with open date and best by date or expiration date. [NAME] 1 further stated there should not be any expired food item.2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for a census of 94 residents, when: 1. Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 did not sanitize a reusable tray between Resident 114 and Resident 115's wound treatment; 2. LN 2 did not wear the required personal protective equipment (PPE, wearable gear like gowns, gloves and masks to protect individuals from physical, chemical, and airborne dangers in workplaces) while repositioning a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, an infection control method); 3. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 and CNA 2 did not wear proper PPE when assisting a resident on neutropenic precautions (used to protect residents from getting infections because their immune system cannot properly fight bacteria); and 4. CNA 4 did not wear N95 mask (an approved respirator to seal tightly around the nose and mouth, filtered at least 95% of airborne particles) while providing care for Resident 43 with coronavirus disease (COVID 19, a contagious virus disease spread through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation of abuse was reported immediately for two of 27 sampled residents (Resident 41 and Resident 52), when the Department did not receive a report of the alleged violation after the abuse incident's occurrence.This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect vulnerable residents and provide a safe environment.Findings:A review of Resident 52's admission Record, indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in December 2025 with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs). A review of Resident 41's admission Record, indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility in March 2026 with diagnoses including difficulty in walking and generalized muscle weakness. A review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), dated 3/26/26, indicated Resident 41's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used by facilities to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services consistent with professional standards of quality for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 104), when Resident 104's psyllium husk (a bulk forming laxative used to treat constipation and cholesterol management) powder order was not prescribed or administered in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines.This failure increased Resident 104's potential to have unmet health needs.Findings:A review of Resident 104's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility in March 2026 with a diagnosis of constipation with unspecified intestinal obstruction.During an observation on 4/13/26 at 4:35 p.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 3, LN 3 prepared medications for Resident 104 including psyllium husk powder. LN 3 placed a teaspoon (tsp. unit of measurement) of psyllium husk powder in a small cup and added an unspecified amount of water. After mixing the medications, LN 3 administered it to Resident 104, who remarked that the drink was too sweet. A review of Resident 104's Order Summary Report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured for a census of 94 residents, when Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 left medications unattended on top of the medication cart.This failure increased the residents' potential for unauthorized access to medications.Findings:During an observation on 4/13/26 at 4:35 p.m. with LN 3 during medication pass, LN 3 was inside a resident's room administering medications. LN 3 left medications on top of medication cart D unattended. The items included two bubble packs, one bottled liquid medication and one canister of powdered medication.During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/13/26 at 4:42 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), DON acknowledged that medications were left unsecured on top of medication cart D while LN 3 was in a resident's room administering medications. DON stated LN 3 should have locked the medications in the cart before going into the resident's room to prevent unauthorized access and ensure resident safety.During an interview on 4/13/26 at 4:46…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was implemented for a census of 85 residents, when flying insects were observed in four residents' rooms.This failure decreased the facility's potential to maintain a pest free environment for the residents.Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 8/12/25, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with a diagnosis of anxiety (a common mental health condition characterized by excessive worry, fear, and unease). Resident 1 had mental capacity to make own decisions.A review of Resident 2's admission Record, dated 8/12/25, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 and had mental capacity to make own decisions.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/12/25 at 11:45 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1's room in Unit C was observed. Numerous small insects were observed flying around and landing on Resident 1's bed, personal belongings, pillows, a window next to her bed, and on the side table. When a curtain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2 punched Resident 1 in the stomach which caused Resident 1 to fall and hit her head. This failure resulted in an injury to Resident 1's head. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility late 2021 with diagnoses which included memory loss, weight loss, muscle wasting, and depression. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 3/10/25, the MDS indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a standardized test that screens for cognitive impairment) score of 9/15 which showed moderate cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 1's eINTERACT Change in Condition Evaluation [eCOCE], dated 4/7/25 at 5 p.m. the eCOCE indicated, .Resident was punched by other resident in the stomach, fell down, hit back of her head on the metal door frame, bleeding a lot. Send out via 911 . During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were maintained for a census of 96 residents, when: 1. Controlled drug (medication that may be abused or cause addiction) record form was not filled out and signed immediately at the time of medication administration for Resident 445; and 2. Unused or expired, controlled drugs were not destroyed according to the facility's policy. These failures had the potential for diversion or misuse of residents' controlled medications. Findings: 1. During a concurrent inspection of medication cart A on [DATE] at 11:14 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 4 (LN 4), a controlled drug count for Resident 445's hydromorphone (a medication used for pain), two milligrams (mg; unit of measure) was inaccurate. There were 10 tablets of hydromorphone two mg in the medication bubble pack and the controlled drug log indicated there should be 11. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:15 a.m. with LN 4, LN 4 stated she gave Resident 445 hydromorphone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%; unit of measure) for two of five sampled residents (Resident 140 and Resident 36). 1. Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2) administered Resident 140's extended release (ER) isosorbide mononitrate (medication used to treat chest pain) 30 milligrams (mg; unit of measure) tablet not in accordance with physician order, when LN 2 crushed the ER tablet and released the medication all at once instead of gradually over time. This error had a potential to lead to an overdose or severe side effects. 2. LN 2 administered Resident 140's delayed release (DR) pantoprazole (a medication used to treat indigestion) 40 mg tablet not in accordance with physician order, when LN 2 crushed the DR tablet and released the medication all at once instead of gradually over time. This error had a potential to lead to an overdose or severe side effects. 3. LN 2 omitted administering Resident 140's physician ordered medication, amlodipine (a medication used to treat high blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored correctly, when: 1. A medication was stored in the refrigerator, not according to manufacturer's specification; 2. A medication was stored at room temperature, not according to manufacturer's specification; and 3. A discontinued medication was not removed from the medication storage room and was still accessible to the staff. These failures had the potential for medication misuse, drug diversion, medication ineffectiveness, and medication administration errors. Findings: 1. During an inspection on 2/4/25 at 9:37 a.m. of the facility's medication storage room, a discontinued, unopened medication, cyanocobalamin 1,000 micrograms/milliliters (mcg/ml; a unit of measure) was found stored in the refrigerator, not according to manufacturer's required storage parameters. A review of the manufacturer's package insert with a revised date of 2017, cyanocobalamin 1,000 mcg/ml, indicated to be stored between 68 degrees (a unit of measure) - 77 degrees Fahrenheit (scale of temperature).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nutritive value of food was maintained, when broccoli was cooked for over two hours prior to lunch meal service. This failure had the potential of leading to nutrient deficiency for the 96 residents receiving facility prepared meals. Findings: During an observation on 2/4/25 at 9:48 a.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] 1 poured frozen broccoli into a pan and placed it into the convection oven to cook. During an observation on 2/4/25 at 12:22 p.m., in the kitchen, lunch meal service started. Observation of the broccoli showed a light green color, with a soft, limp texture when served. During the lunch meal on 2/4/25 at 1:15 p.m., two test trays were placed on the final meal cart (a regular diet and a pureed texture). The two test trays were picked up at 1:30 p.m. Food items tasted were: Regular pork with gravy, pureed pork with gravy, regular seasoned broccoli, pureed seasoned broccoli, and polenta. The broccoli was extremely soft…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food storage and preparation, as well as maintain kitchen equipment and food contact surfaces in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, when: 1. Three baking sheets, one frying pan, one container for scoops, stove knobs, convention oven, and mixer were found dirty; 2. Ten pans, two frying pans, and blender were stored wet; 3. Pipes under three-compartment sink found rusted and dirty, floors were discolored with white and gray buildup, and counter had a white discolored area; 4. Yellow cutting board found with two deep grooves of about one and a half to two inches in length; 5. Four bulk storage containers were found with lids not closed tightly; and 6. Fan in dish machine area was found with black build-up on the blades. These failures had the potential to lead to food borne illness for the 96 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 2/3/25 at 8:31 a.m., three baking sheets were found stacked under the steam table with dark…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident refrigerator and microwave for a census of 96 to ensure safe food storage and reheating of food for later consumption. This failure had the potential to prevent residents from enjoying favorite foods, reduced resident food options, and potentially lead to weight loss. Findings: During an interview on 2/5/25 at 12:13 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1), CNA 1 stated outside food would be checked against the diet order before it would be given to the resident. If a resident had left over food, it could not stay in the room for more than two hours before the facility would discard it. CNA 1 further stated that they do not refrigerate food for residents, because there was not a refrigerator and microwave for resident use. During an interview on 2/5/25 at 12:18 p.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), LN 1 stated they advised family members against bringing perishable foods as the facility did not store or re-heat resident food. During an interview on 2/5/25 at 12:37 p.m. with CNA 2, CNA 2 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition, when: 1. The Walk-in freezer was found with ice build-up on ceiling, floor, door, walls, and fan unit indicating potential temperature changes; 2. The dish machine's required minimum temperatures were not reached; and 3. The convection oven was not achieving the desired food temperature for the pork at or above 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F, a unit of measurement). These failures had the potential of leading to food borne illness for the 96 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/3/25 at 8:51 a.m. with Dietary Manager (DM) in the walk-in freezer, the walk-in freezer was observed with ice build-up on the fan unit, ceiling, and pieces of ice on the floor. DM stated maintenance was in earlier removing ice build-up in the freezer which may be the cause of the ice on the floor. During an observation on 2/3/25 at 11:38 a.m., in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain respect and dignity for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 439), when Resident 439's bilateral buttocks' sides were exposed in the hallway during transfer. This failure decreased the facility's potential to maintain Resident 439's respect and dignity. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 439 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with a diagnosis of panic disorder (a frequent and unexpected panic attack). During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/3/25 at 9:54 a.m. with Resident 439's daughter, Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA 3) was wheeling Resident 439 on a shower chair in the hallway. Resident 439's bilateral buttocks' sides were not covered by the gown and were exposed to other residents, staff members, and Resident 439's daughter. Resident 439's daughter stated there was a respect and dignity issue when Resident 439's body was exposed. During an interview on 2/6/25 at 9:34 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated staff should have covered Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate communication method for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 70), when Licensed Nurse 7 (LN 7) was unable to find a communication board to communicate with Resident 70. This failure decreased the facility's potential to address Resident 70's basic needs. Findings: A review of an admission Record indicated Resident 70 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including speech and language deficits. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/4/25 at 8:53 a.m. with Resident 70 in her room, Resident 70 was unable to verbalize her needs and was using body language and gestures. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/4/25 at 2:21 p.m. with LN 7 in Resident 70's room, LN 7 was unable to communicate with Resident 70 and started searching for the communication board inside Resident 70's room. LN 7 confirmed there was no communication board inside Resident 70's room and stated there should have been a communication board to help Resident 70 communicate with staff.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 64) free of unnecessary psychotropic medication (drug prescribed to affect the mind, emotions or behavior), when Resident 64 was receiving divalproex sodium (a psychotropic medication indicated for seizure treatment and mood disorders) for an inadequate indication. This failure increased Resident 64's potential for unwanted adverse effects such as sedation and falls. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 64 was 78-years old, admitted in May 2024 to the facility from an acute care hospital with diagnoses including worsening disease of the nervous system, anxiety, depression, and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) with behavioral disturbance. A review of Residents 64's Care Plan, dated 5/16/24, indicated Resident 64 was at risk for fall and injury related to her diagnoses. A review of Resident 64's Minimum Data Sets (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 5/23/24, 8/23/24, and 11/23/24, indicated a Brief Interview of Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices for three of 22 sampled residents (Resident 441, Resident 69, and Resident 290), when: 1. Licensed Nurse 6 (LN 6) did not change gloves during wound care treatment for Resident 441; 2. LN 6 did not follow proper handwashing and glove changing procedures during wound treatment for Resident 69; and 3. Resident 290's midline (a thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm and used to administer medicines and fluid directly into blood) dressing on left upper arm (LUA) was soiled and not changed for nine days. These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent spread of infections among vulnerable residents. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 441's admission Record, indicated Resident 441 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with a diagnosis of sepsis (harmful microorganisms in the blood or other tissues that could potentially lead to malfunction of the organs, shock, and death). A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free of physical abuse when Resident 1 was struck in the face by Resident 2. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a swollen bruise to her face and feeling unsafe. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted in the spring of 2024 with an admission diagnosis of irregular heartbeat. Resident 1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 12 out of 15 which indicated his cognitive function was moderately impaired. Resident 1 was her own responsible party. Resident 2 was admitted in the spring of 2024 with an admission diagnosis of spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal canal that compresses the spinal cord and nerve roots, causing pain, numbness, or weakness in the arms or legs). Resident 2 had a BIMS score of 14 out of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact and was her own responsible party. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning call light system for two of four sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 4) when neither the outside light above their room lit nor the alarm sounded when the emergency call light was pushed in the bathroom. This failure had the potential to result in unmet care needs and placed the residents at risk for safety. Findings: Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE] for a fracture of the right femur. Resident 3 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was her own responsible party. Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE] with a fracture of one rib. Resident 4 has a BIMS score of 12 out of 15 which indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognitive function. Resident 4 was responsible party for self. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care according to accepted standards of quality for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3 had no documented behavior monitoring for the use of an antipsychotic medication (medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior). This failure had the potential to result in an ineffective management of Resident 3's psychological health needs. Findings: A review of an admission Record for Resident 3 indicated she was admitted in 6/2024 with diagnoses including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (mental illness that cause extreme mood swings that include emotional highs and lows). A review of Resident 3's Physician Orders, dated 6/25/24, indicated an order for Invega 156 milligrams (mg., a unit of measurement) per milliliter (ml., a unit of measure) given once a month for schizophrenia. A review of Resident 3's Progress Notes, dated 6/28/24 at 4:47 p.m., indicated that a nurse from a psychiatric clinic came to the facility and administered/injected Invega to Resident 3 as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) at a high risk for elopement. This failure placed Resident 1 at an increased risk for elopement. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used for care), dated 5/23/24, indicated that Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool) score of 4 out of 15, with memory problems. The MDS further indicated Resident 1 could independently transfer and ambulate using a walker. During observations on 7/1/24 at 11:40 a.m., 12:25 p.m., and 1:32 p.m., Resident 1 was observed ambulating alone without a walker by the hallways unable to go back to her own room without assistance. A review of Resident 3's Progress Notes, dated 6/24/24 at 6:43 p.m. and at 11:36 p.m., indicated Resident 3 exhibited verbal and physical aggression towards staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-07 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Food/Nutrition Director had the qualifications needed to oversee the dietary department. This had had the potential of unsafe food practices and food borne illness for the 94 residents eating facility prepared foods. Findings: During an interview with the Food/Nutrition Director (FND) on 12/5/23 at 9:28 a.m. a certificate of education completion was not observed in his office. When asked about his path to becoming the Food/Nutrition Director, he stated he had experience running a kitchen under the direction of a Registered Dietitian (RD) but had no formal education. Review of California Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 1265.4 indicated that if A health facility that employs a registered dietitian less than full time, shall also employ a full-time dietetic services supervisor who meets the requirements of subdivision (b) to supervise dietetic service operations. (b) The dietetic services supervisor shall have completed at least one of the following educational requirements: (1) A baccalaureate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 94 residents eating facility prepared meals as evidenced by: 1) Food preparation items were found dirty; 2) Food preparation and service equipment were found substandard; 3) Food service items were found stacked wet; 4) Opened containers were found in dry storage; 5) Multiple food items not correctly dated; 6) Fruit/vegetable sink lacked an air gap; and 7) Expired food produce. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (illness that results from ingestion of contaminated food) to residents receiving food prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 12/4/23 at 9:01 a.m., the following food preparation items were found dirty: a. A metal container with utensils found to have food residue and crumbs; b. Food processor was found to have yellow and brown markings including the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-07 · tag F0847 — widespreadInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights were protected when entering into a binding arbitration agreement for a census of 97 when the agreement did not explicitly state the resident, or his or her responsible party (RP), had 30 days to rescind the agreement and did not contain an acknowledgement of the resident's or RP's understanding of the agreement. These failures had the potential to result in residents and/or their RPs entering into binding arbitration agreements without fully understanding the consequences. Findings: In an interview, on 12/4/23 at 8:49 a.m., the Administrator (ADM) stated the facility had asked residents and/or their RP's to enter into binding arbitration agreements. A review of the facility's binding arbitration agreement, on 12/5/23 at 10:51 a.m., indicated it did not contain an explicit statement the resident or RP had the right to rescind the agreement within 30 days of signing and did not include an acknowledgement of understanding by the resident or RP. In a concurrent record review and interview, on 12/7/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the freezer in safe operating condition when ice buildup was noted on the door, curtains, walls and floor. This had the potential to affect the safety and quality of the food served at the facility for the 94 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 12/4/23 at 9:58 a.m., the freezer door was opened. On the back of the door was a build up of ice starting about 6 (inches) from the top of the door. The ice pattern was close to 1.5' (feet) in length and approximately 10 across at its widest point. The top portion of the ice curtains were also covered in ice as well as the right side walls, and ice was observed dripping from the pipes, and ice chunks had collected on the freezer floor. During a subsequent interview with the Maintenance Manager (MM) on 12/4/23 at 10:22 a.m., he stated that the leakage through the walls had been had fixed last month. He further explained that he wasn't aware that this was still a problem. During a return visit to the kitchen on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Have an efficient system in place to accurately document and secure emergency medications (E-kit) for a census of 97; and, 2. Store controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction) to limit access in accordance with facility policy. These failures had the potential for emergency medications to be unavailable when needed, the potential for not meeting the residents' therapeutic needs or worsening of their medical conditions, and potential for diversion of controlled medications. Findings: 1. During an inspection of the medication storage room on 12/4/23 at 11:27 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), the First Dose Oral Medications and Intravenous (into the vein) E-kits were sealed with red plastic ties indicating they had been opened by nursing staff. Inside the oral medications E-kit were nine E-kit logs (a document completed by nursing staff whenever a medication is removed from the emergency supply), with the earliest entry into the kit documented on 11/29/23. One of the nine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 27 sampled residents (Residents 44 and Resident 71) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when: 1. Resident 44 received quetiapine (an antipsychotic) without target behavior monitoring and non-pharmacological (non-drug) interventions; and 2. Resident 71 received risperidone (an antipsychotic) without adequate indication and behavior monitoring. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary use of medication. Findings: 1. Resident 44 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses which included post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident 44's medical record (MR) indicated a physician's order for quetiapine 100 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement), give 1 tablet at bedtime related to post-traumatic stress disorder m/b (manifested by) inability to relax, dated 11/8/23. Resident 44's MR indicated the facility was not monitoring for target behaviors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored safely for a census of 97 when: 1. Opened multi-dose medications and biologicals were dated with an open and discard date, expired medications were not available for resident use, pharmacy dispensed insulin (a medication to treat diabetes) were labeled, and medications were stored in the medication carts (med carts) in a safe and sanitary manner; and, 2. Medications were locked in a medication cart when unattended. These failures had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe and reduced potency from being used past their discard date, receive incorrect medications from inadequate labeling and unsafe storage, and the potential for medication misuse and diversion. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/4/23 at 11:27 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), an inspection of the medication storage room refrigerator identified one vial Tubersol (an injectable used to diagnose exposure to tuberculosis, a bacterial disease that affects the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served was palatable, attractive, and at a safe temperature for eight of 94 Residents (Resident 12, 23, 34, 39, 40, 184, 185, and 379) whose meals were delivered and served cold. These failures had the potential for decreased meal intake which could result in weight loss, decreased nutritive value, and negatively impact the residents' quality of life. Findings: During an interview on 12/04/23 at 09:19 a.m., Resident 379 stated, My breakfast was cold this morning including the sausage. During an interview on 12/4/23 at 9:50 a.m., Resident 40 stated, Food/soup is always cold and has no taste. During an interview on 12/4/23 at 9:59 a.m., Resident 34 stated, Soup was always served cold. During an interview on 12/04/23 at 10:52 a.m., Resident 12 stated, Today's breakfast was cold, the pancake and sausage were cold. The hot oatmeal was cold. I told the staff, and they responded the food was hot when it arrived. I wanted the food rewarmed and that did not happen. They seemed to be very busy, and I was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call lights were within reach for four residents (Resident 27, Resident 36, Resident 62, and Resident 380) of 27 sampled residents, when the call lights were stuck behind the residents' beds and dressers on the floor. This failure decreased the residents' potential to get assistance from staff in a timely manner when needed. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), and history of falling. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 380 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and shortness of breath. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including parkinsonism (brain conditions that cause slowed movements and stiffness),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain dignity for one of 27 sampled resident (Resident 14) when Resident 14's catheter bag (a bag that collects urine from an indwelling urinary catheter) was exposed. This failure had the potential to reduce Resident 14's right to respect and dignity. Findings: A review of the facility document titled, admission Record, indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including kidney failure. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/4/23 at 8:51 a.m., in Resident 14's room, Resident 14's catheter bag was hanging off the bed with brown urine inside without a privacy cover. Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) confirmed there was no privacy cover over the catheter bag. CNA 1 confirmed there should have been a privacy cover for Resident 14's catheter bag. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 10:06 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated staff should have placed a privacy cover over the catheter bag. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a medical order that gives patients control over their care during a medical emergency) forms for two residents (Resident 187 and Resident 378), of 27 sampled residents, were valid in the electronic health records (EHRs) when POLST information did not match with EHR. This failure decreased the staff's potential to safely follow the residents' POLST during emergencies. Findings: A review of Resident 187's admission record indicated he was admitted in 11/23 with diagnoses including heart failure and severe obesity. A review of Resident 187's clinical record included the following documents: A POLST, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 187 had elected Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) if he were to be found without a pulse and not breathing and full treatment be provided if he were to be found to have a pulse and/or was not breathing. A physician's order, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 187…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and safe living environment for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 49) when the bed provided for Resident 49 was very small and worn out. This failure increased resident 49's potential for discomfort, sleep disturbances, and injury. Findings: A review of Resident 49's admission record indicated he was admitted in 6/2023 with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness, and had the capacity to make healthcare decisions. A review of Resident 49's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 7/2023, indicated Resident 49 had no memory problems with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive assessment tool) score of 13 out of 15. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/4/23 at 10:09 a.m., with Resident 49, he was observed lying in bed with no foot board and noticed both feet hanging and sticking out over the bed, foot board at the corner by the wall. Resident 49 stated maintenance staff had to take it off because he hits his heels on it whenever he moves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) in a timely manner for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 47). This failure had the potential of not providing appropriate care and interventions to Resident 47 based on her current status. Findings: Resident 47 was admitted in 6/2023 with diagnoses including metastatic lung cancer (cancer that spread from its origin in the lung), and dementia and did not have capacity to make their own choices. The daughter was listed as the responsible party (RP) who makes healthcare decisions. A review of facility MDS Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool) score was 6 out 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 47's Order Listing Report (OLR), indicated Resident 47 was admitted under hospice care (specialized treatment for people with serious illness or end of life care) and was discharged from the hospice program per physicians' order on 11/8/23, due to an extended prognosis. During a concurrent interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess one resident (Resident 36) of 27 sampled residents, when the Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) inaccurately indicated Resident 36 had no behaviors. This failure decreased the facility's potential to identify residents' care needs. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility in June 2021 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident 36's Order Summary Report, dated 10/31/23, indicated Resident 36 started to receive 2.5 milligrams (mg; a unit of measure) of olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) at bedtime for agitation manifested by yelling out. A review of Resident 36's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 36 exhibited no verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others. A review of Resident 36's Medication Administration Record (MAR),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one resident (Resident 16) of 27 sampled residents within 48 hours after admission. This failure decreased the facility's potential to address the residents' initial goals and current health needs. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including pneumonia (lung infection) and dialysis (treatment for kidney failure). A review of Resident 16's 48 Hour Baseline Care Plan, indicated the baseline care plan was completed on 11/17/23. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 2:42 p.m. with the Resources Nurse Consultant (RNC), RNC confirmed Resident 16's baseline care plan was not completed within 48 hours after admission. RNC stated the baseline care plan should have been completed within 48 hours because nurses could use it as a tool to get an idea about the resident's care and services and what areas to focus on and it would also help in the discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one resident (Resident 36) of 27 sampled residents, when the care plan did not address Resident 36's behavioral needs and interventions. This failure decreased the facility's potential to address the residents' individualized and specific needs. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident 36's Order Summary Report, dated 10/31/23, indicated Resident 36 started to receive 2.5 milligrams (mg; a unit of measure) of olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) at bedtime for agitation manifested by yelling out. A review of Resident 36's Order Summary Report, dated 11/1/23, indicated to monitor Resident 36 for yelling out every shift. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services according to professional standards of quality for two residents (Resident 36 and Resident 47) of 27 sampled residents, when: 1. Resident 36's oxygen was not administered as indicated in physician's order; and, 2. Resident 47's physician order for the use of an external catheter was not obtained. These failures had the potential to jeopardize resident health when physician orders were not obtained or followed. Findings: 1. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including palliative care (specialized medical care for people living with a serious illness), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), tobacco use, and chronic obstructive pulmonary (lung) disease. A review of Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool), dated 11/10/23, indicated Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was two of 15 with memory loss. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assist one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 61) to receive a hearing assessment when Resident 61 had difficulty hearing. This failure decreased Resident 61's ability to communicate needs properly and negatively affected her psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 61 was admitted in early 7/2023 with diagnoses including recurrent major depressive disorder, able to understand choices and make own healthcare decisions. Resident 61 had intact memory and a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool) score of 14 out of 15. A review of Resident 61's admission notes, dated 7/12/23, indicated the admitting nurse noted a report from the acute hospital that Resident 61 was hard of hearing. A review of the social services notes, dated 7/13/23, indicated Resident 61 used hearing aids, but were left at home. A review of Resident 61's physical examination, done on 8/15/23, the Physician confirmed Resident 61 had moderate bilateral hearing loss. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/4/23, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 185) when a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure machine (CPAP; a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while sleeping) treatment had not been applied nightly as ordered by the physician (MD). This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 185's sleep and respiratory status. Findings: A review of Resident 185's admission record indicated she was admitted in 12/23 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low blood oxygen levels) and obstructive sleep apnea (intermittent airflow blockage during sleep). The record also indicated Resident 185 was her own responsible party (RP). An MD order, dated 12/1/23, indicated Resident 185 was to wear a CPAP at night while sleeping. A MAR (Medication Administration Record), dated 12/23, indicated Resident 185 had worn the CPAP at night 12/1/23- 12/5/23. An Administration Note, dated 12/4/23, indicated Resident 185 was not using the CPAP machine.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide medically related social services for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 45) when Resident 45's request to acquire a 4-wheeled walker with a seat was not facilitated in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to decrease Resident 45's ability to maintain her highest practicable physical well-being. Findings: Resident 45 was admitted in 9/2021 with diagnoses including transient ischemic attack (TIA, mini stroke disruption of blood supply to the brain). Resident 45 did not have the capacity to make own healthcare decisions, and required supervision assistance for locomotion on/off the unit in a wheelchair and with ambulation using a walker. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/4/23 at 8:41 a.m. Resident 45 was walking by the hallway while using her wheelchair as a walker. Resident 45 stated she's been requesting a walker with a seat for a long time, but never got it, and her wheelchair stops suddenly whenever she propels in it, that was the reason why she just used the wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one resident (Resident 36) of 27 sampled residents, when the Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not include Resident 36's use of oxygen. This failure increased the facility's potential for oversight in Resident 36's assessment, care, and treatment. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including palliative care (specialized medical care for people living with a serious illness), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), tobacco use, and chronic obstructive pulmonary (lung) disease. A review of Resident 36's Care Plan, dated 11/15/23, indicated Resident 36 was a smoker. During an observation on 12/4/23 at 9:38 a.m., in Resident 36's room, Resident 36 was lying in his bed and connected to oxygen at three liters per minute via nasal cannula (a device that delivers extra oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain infection control practices designed to provide a sanitary environment for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 129) when staff did not maintain hand hygiene practices and change gloves during wound care. This failure had the potential to result in transmission of infection in the facility and cause illness. Findings: Review of the admission Record, Resident 129 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including a pressure ulcer (injury to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) on the buttock. During an observation on 12/5/23 at 3:06 p.m., with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3) during wound care for a right buttock wound for Resident 129, LN 3 was preparing wound care supplies, touched the trash can, removed the soiled dressing, cleaned the wound, and applied the new dressing using the same gloves. During an interview on 12/5/23 at 3:19 p.m., LN 3 confirmed she should have changed gloves and maintained hand hygiene practice during wound care.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CYPRESS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 3.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| JACKSON, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/29/2023 |
| JACKSON, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/29/2023 |
| SANOFSKY, JACK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/29/2023 |
| DHIR, SUNIL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| FULKERSON, JESSICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/18/2025 |
| KAUR, SHALENDAR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| TYSON, ZACHARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/29/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $303K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555083. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.