Greenhaven Healthcare Center
455 Florin Road, Sacramento, CA 95831 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 148 certified beds · (916) 393-2550 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.6% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 1.8% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.1% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.06 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.23 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
75.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 157 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 42% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 75.5%CMS range 68.0–81.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 7.4–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 67.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 5.1–11.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.76 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 144.7 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.25 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.37 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
72 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure safety for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 fell when alone and unsupervised outdoors. This failure resulted in Resident 1's fall and subsequent transfer to the acute care hospital for further evaluation. This evaluation indicated that Resident 1 had widespread bleeding on his head and later died in the hospital.Findings:A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted August of 2016 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness) following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding into the spaces around the brain) affecting left dominant side and aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak) following cerebrovascular disease (loss of blood flow to a part of the brain). The Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized resident assessment tool) dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to eliminate accident hazards in the resident's environment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: Resident 1 sustained a hematoma (localized collection of pooled blood that gathers outside of a blood vessel, usually caused by injury, trauma, or surgery) after a chair was removed from the secure wall mount by a staff member and left leaning against Resident 1's room wall. Resident 1 later bumped into the chair, which then fell onto her left knee causing the accident.This failure resulted in an avoidable accident with a minor injury to Resident 1's left knee.According to the admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 1 in February 2022 with multiple diagnoses including heart failure and glaucoma (eye condition). Resident 1 was discharged in June 2026. A review of Resident 1's Change in Condition assessment dated [DATE] indicated, Resident 1 sustained a hematoma to her left knee after a chair hit her left knee in her room.A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-05 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the employed social worker met the minimum qualifications of the position as per federal regulations for a census of 143 residents, when the social worker had no bachelor's degree since hiring to meet the required minimum qualifications of the position for a facility with more than 120 beds.This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide social services that meet the residents' individualized needs.Findings:A review of the Social Service Manager's (SSM) undated Employee Information, indicated SSM was hired on 11/10/25 for the Social Services Director (SSD) position.A review of the SSM's Offer Letter for Social Services Leader at [the facility name], dated 10/21/25, indicated SSM was offered a full-time position as a Social Services Lead and anticipated starting on 11/17/25.A review of the facility's undated document for manager key personnel, indicated SSM was in charge of the social services department.A review of the SSM's Application for Employment, dated 10/30/25, indicated the SSM's applied position…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a care plan for Resident 1's peripheral IV [(PIV) intravenous line-delivers fluids, medications or nutrients directly into a vein] was not developed. This failure had the potential to cause an increased risk of infection and bleeding.Findings:A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in January 2026 with multiple diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), malignant neoplasm of esophagus (esophageal cancer), and Parkinson's Disease (progressive movement disorder of the nervous system).A review of Resident 1's Order Details dated 3/20/26 indicated, Place PIV for IV ATB [antibiotic] (medication to treat infection) one time only.A review of Resident 1's Order Details dated 3/20/26 for Ertapenem Sodium Injection Solution Reconstitutes 1 Gm [gram] (unit of measure) .Use 1 gram intravenously one time a day for UTI [urinary tract infection] for 7 days.During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a peripheral IV (PIV- intravenous line-delivers fluids, medications or nutrients directly into a vein) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was discontinued prior to being discharged from the facility. This failure had the potential for inadequate monitoring of Resident 1's PIV and could have resulted in an infection or bleeding for Resident 1.Findings:A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in January 2026 with multiple diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), malignant neoplasm of esophagus (esophageal cancer), and Parkinson's Disease (progressive movement disorder of the nervous system).A review of Resident 1's Order Details dated 3/20/26 indicated, Place PIV for IV ATB [antibiotic] (medication to treat infection) one time only.A review of Resident 1's Order Details dated 3/20/26 for Ertapenem Sodium Injection Solution Reconstitutes 1 Gm [gram] (unit of measure) .Use 1 gram intravenously one time a day for UTI [urinary tract infection]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one (Resident 1) out of four sampled residents to return to the facility after hospitalization.This failure resulted in the resident remaining in the hospital despite being medically stable for discharge and created the potential for the resident to have no safe discharge location once hospital-level care was no longer required.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), indicated, Resident 1 was admitted 4/2025 with the diagnosis including End Stage Renal Disease ( ESRD- kidneys no longer work as they should to meet the body's needs), Diabetes Mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing.)During a review of interdisciplinary Note (IDT - shared record where different professionals [ doctors, nurses, nurse practitioner, social worker] documents their findings together in one place) dated 2/18/26, indicated, .Left big toe infection.Suspected Osteomyelitis (osteomyelitis- inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection). IDT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective medication management, when:1. Two of six randomly selected residents' (Resident 12 and Resident 111) controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) were not accurately accounted for on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an accountability record); and 2. Automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) medication discrepancies, including those involving controlled substances were not identified, reported and resolved in a timely manner for a census of 144 residents.These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent misuse, loss, or diversion of controlled substances and resulted in three unresolved ADC discrepancies, including a morphine solution (a controlled medication to treat pain) discrepancy that remained unresolved for 21 days.Findings:1. A review of Resident 111's clinical record indicated the following as needed (PRN) orders, dated 2/3/26: (a) Oxycodone (controlled medication for pain) five milligrams (mg;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored, labeled, and maintained according to the facility's policy and/or manufacturer's specifications for a census of 144 residents, when:1. A treatment cart containing supplies and medications was left unlocked and unsupervised; 2. Resident 74 and Resident 12 had expired medications stored in two of four medication carts;3. Resident 54 had one opened and undated foil pouch containing levalbuterol (a medication to relieve shortness of breath) stored in one of five medication rooms; and 4. Resident 32 had a compounded intravenous (IV; administered into a vein) medication, daptomycin (a potent antibiotic) stored in one of five medication refrigerators after being discontinued.These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent unauthorized access to medication carts, misuse of medications, administration of expired, contaminated, reduced potency, and ineffective medications and medication errors for vulnerable residents.Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure texture modified diets were prepared to the correct texture in accordance with the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) guidelines, when pureed and minced and moist trays did not meet required texture standards. This deficient practice placed the 17 residents on the pureed diet and the eight residents on the minced and moist diet at risk for choking and aspiration (food or liquid entering the airway).Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/24/26 at 10:17 a.m. with [NAME] 1 in the kitchen, [NAME] 1 removed turkey from the oven and added it to the food processor bowl to create texture modified diets. After grinding all the turkey to make the minced and moist texture, [NAME] 1 removed the minced and moist portions and placed it in a steam table pan. The remaining turkey in the processor bowl was mixed with an unmeasured amount of a chicken broth and margarine mixture. [NAME] 1 processed the turkey twice before deciding it was too chunky and proceeded to add…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the food preparation and storage areas in a sanitary condition for a census of 144 residents, when:Ice buildup was present on a pipe in the walk-in refrigerator and on the ceiling and cooling unit of the freezer;Racks holding food products were found coated with a rust-colored substance;Dirty dishes and mugs were left on clean nourishment room counters;Holes were found in kitchen wall along with chipping paint; andItems in the residents' refrigerator were not labeled and dated. These failures had the potential to allow contamination of food and food-contact surfaces, increasing the risk of bacterial growth and foodborne illness (illness caused by consuming contaminated food) for residents.Findings: 1. During an observation on 2/23/26 at 8:58 a.m. in the walk-in refrigerator, significant ice buildup was observed on an insulated black pipe descending from the ceiling at the back of the refrigerator near the entrance to the freezer. The ice buildup measured approximately eight inches (a unit of measure)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident food and beverages brought from outside of the facility were consistently stored and managed under sanitary conditions for a census of 144 residents, when staff demonstrated inconsistent knowledge regarding storage timeframes and reheating practices. This failure had the potential for allowing bacterial growth and cross-contamination, consumption of food beyond safe storage timeframes and limiting resident food options.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/24/26 at 11 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM), the nourishment rooms were inspected. No microwaves were observed on the nursing units. DM stated staff could heat residents' food using the microwave in the dining room. During an interview on 2/24/26 at 8:04 a.m. with Resident 133 on Wing A, Resident 133 stated she and her previous roommate used to order food from an outside delivery source and share the meal; otherwise if she ordered by herself then it was too much food and would be thrown out in 48 hours as per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 61 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control measures for two of 31 sampled residents (Resident 37 and Resident 157), when:1. Licensed Nurse (LN) 10 did not maintain proper hand hygiene practices during wound care for Resident 37; and2. Two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) did not wear the required personal protective equipment (PPE, protective clothing/gown, gloves, facemasks/face shields designed to protect the wearer from injury or the spread of infection) while providing care to Resident 157 who was on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP, an infection control method).These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent spreading an infection among vulnerable residents.Findings: 1. A review of Resident 37's admission Record, dated 2/26/26, indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses including foot ulcer (an open sore) and diabetes (a chronic condition characterized by high blood sugar levels). A review of Resident 37's Medication Review Report, dated 2/26/26, indicated Resident 37…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of advance directives was obtained for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 87), when a copy of Resident 87's advance directive was not available in the facility's medical records.This failure decreased the facility's potential to honor the end-of-life wishes of its residents.Findings:A review of Resident 87's admission Record, dated 2/26/26, indicated Resident 87 was admitted to the facility in January 2026 for hospice care (compassionate care for people who are near the end of life provided at the person's home or within a health care facility).A review of Resident 87's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 1/8/26, indicated Resident 87's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score was eight out of 15 with moderate decline in mental capacity.During an interview on 2/23/26 at 10:11 a.m. with Resident 87, Resident 87 was incapable to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 72) was free from abuse, when Resident 91 verbally abused Resident 72 for three nights.This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect Resident 72 from verbal abuse and maintain residents' psychosocial wellbeing.Findings:A review of Resident 72's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility in January 2026 with a diagnosis of obesity (excess body fat that increases the risk of health conditions like heart disease).A review of Resident 72's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 2/6/26, indicated her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score was 15 out of 15 with intact memory.A review of Resident 91's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility in January 2026 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services according to accepted standards of quality for two of six sampled residents (Resident 74 and Resident 148), when: 1. Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 administered Xeljanz (tofacitinib; an immune suppressant medication) to Resident 74 without following the required hazardous drug handling procedures; and 2. LN 1 did not remain with Resident 148 to ensure MiraLAX (a powdered laxative) was taken as prescribed.These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent hazardous drug exposure, incorrect dosing, wrong ingestion, and adverse effects due to lack of monitoring for residents.Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 2/23/26 at 8:28 a.m. on Unit D, LN 1 was observed preparing 13 medications for Resident 74, including Xeljanz without wearing gloves. During an observation on 2/23/26 at 8:40 a.m., LN 1 was observed at Resident 74's beside administering Xeljanz medication with a spoon, without wearing gloves. During a concurrent interview and label review on 2/23/26 at 8:49 a.m. with LN 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ancillary services were provided for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 44), when Resident 44's eyeglasses prescription was not carried out as ordered by the physician and a hearing consultation was not scheduled promptly.These failures had the potential for a delayed delivery of care to help improve Resident 44's vision and hearing.Findings:A review of Resident 44's admission Record, indicated he was admitted to the facility in June 2025 with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie malnutrition and repeated falls.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/23/26 at 10:54 a.m. with Resident 44 in his room, Resident 44 spoke in a loud voice and stated he had been requesting from staff to see an eye and ear doctor to improve his vision and hearing. Resident 44 also stated he feared to potentially lose vision in one eye if the consultation will be delayed further.A review of Resident 44's optometry (comprehensive primary eye and vision care) consultation notes, dated 10/5/25, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 3), when floor mats were not placed beside Resident 3's bed as ordered.This failure increased Resident 3's potential to sustain injury after fall.Findings:A review of an admission record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 with a diagnosis of repeated falls related to right hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body).A review of Resident 3's Care Plan, dated 11/18/25, indicated Resident 3 was at risk for falls due to impaired mobility related to cerebrovascular accident (CVA or stroke; loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) with right hemiplegia.A review of Resident 3's Medication Regimen Review (MRR), dated 11/21/25, indicated Resident 3 was at high risk for falls and staff should ensure floor mats were in place on both sides of Resident 3's bed every shift for fall prevention. During observations on 2/25/26 at 8:07 a.m., 11:15 a.m., and 12:10 p.m. in Resident 3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 12), when Licensed Nurse (LN) 10 did not assess Resident 12's pain and administer pain medication prior to wound care.This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide Resident 12 with an effective pain management.Findings:A review of Resident 12's admission Record, dated 2/26/26, indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with diagnoses including chronic pain (long term pain) and depression (a serious mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and low energy).A review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/31/25, indicated Resident 12 had some memory impairment.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/25/26 at 2:56 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5, CNA 5 assisted Resident 12 with turning and repositioning before wound care in bed. CNA 5 confirmed Resident 12 was moaning multiple times when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for one resident (Resident 74) of a census of 144, when Resident 74 received 12 doses of insulin (a medication to regulate blood sugar) from a pen used past the manufacturer's opened expiration date. This failure resulted in the administration of expired medication to Resident 74, creating the potential for reduced potency, elevated blood sugar levels, adverse effects, and bacterial contamination.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:19 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2, Unit D Medication Cart 2 was inspected. One Lantus Solostar (insulin glargine-long-acting insulin) pen assigned to Resident 74 was observed with a hand written date of 1/13 on the prescription label. LN 2 confirmed this was the open date, then calculated 28 days from the open date and stated the insulin pen expired on [DATE]. A review of Resident 74's order report, revised on [DATE], indicated an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed in accordance with professional standards of care and per facility policy for Resident 1, when Resident 1's physician ordered a CT scan (medical imaging technique used to obtain detailed internal images of the body) that was not implemented timely. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's health and their ability to achieve their highest practical well-being by delaying ordered care. Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with multiple diagnoses which included traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum (bleeding within the brain caused by a traumatic injury). A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 7/2/25, indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 1's discharge document titled, SNF ORDERS, with faxed date of 1/8/2025, indicated, Lab/Imagining Orders.CT head without contrast in two weeks (around 1/20/2025).A Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for one out of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2 punched Resident 1 on his left arm.This failure resulted in Resident 1 not free from physical abuse by Resident 2.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission record (AR), indicated Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis including multiple sclerosis (MS- a chronic, progressive disease involving damage to the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord).During a review of Resident's 1 Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 6/7/25, indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition.During a review of Resident 1's Social Services Note dated 7/17/25 at 2:35 p.m., indicated Resident [1] was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation .with another male resident [Resident 2]. Staff observed this encounter.Per Resident [1], he was punched to his left arm.During a review of Resident 2's AR,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of seven sampled residents ' (Resident 1) right to be free from physical abuse when Resident 2 struck Resident 1 on her left arm and Resident 2 continued to have access to Resident 1 after the altercation. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being fearful to leave her room or attend activities. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in January of 2025 with diagnoses that included difficulty with walking. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (a standardized assessment tool used in nursing homes), dated 5/5/25, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident 1 had no mental impairments or deficits. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in August of 2023 with diagnoses that included decline in cognitive function that interfers with daily life. A review of Resident 2 ' s MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 2 had significant mental and cognitive impairment. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 2) was protected from physical abuse when Resident 2 was slapped by Resident 1 on the left cheek and head. This failure had the potential to cause injury, fear, and distress to Resident 2. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in late 2023 with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer ' s disease (a brain disorder that leads to memory loss and other thinking difficulties). A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 1/20/25, reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 6 out of 15 which indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 2 ' s admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in late…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light was placed within easy reach for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential for Resident 3 being unable to call for assistance with care needs. Additionally, Resident 3 was assessed to be at high risk for falls. Findings: A review of Resident 3 ' s admission record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in late 2019 with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer ' s disease (a brain disorder that leads to memory loss and other thinking difficulties). A review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 2/10/25, reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of residents) score of 3 out of 15 that indicated Resident 3 had severe cognitive impairment A review of Resident 3 ' s Fall Risk Evaluation dated 2/10/25, indicated Resident 3 ' s score was a 19 that indicated resident was at high risk for falls.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care was provided for one of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) when skin assessment (involves visual and tactile examination of the skin to identify potential issues such as change in skin color) was not conducted prior to resident's discharge. This failure to conduct skin assessment increased the potential for Resident 1 to not receive immediate treatment and prevent further skin breakdown. Findings: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted December of 2023 with diagnoses including chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of bilateral lower extremities (persistent high blood pressure in the veins of both legs leading to open sores on the skin), lymphedema (swelling caused by buildup of fluid in the body's tissues often in the arms and legs), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment, treatment and care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when treatment orders were not obtained, and a nursing care plan was not developed and implemented for a newly sustained skin tear. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 ' s wound to have delayed or compromised healing. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted in the middle of 2024 with diagnoses which included diabetes (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), memory impairment and respiratory failure. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Assessment (MDS- a federally mandated resident was totally dependent with activities of daily living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves). During a review of Resident 1 ' s physician ' s orders, there was no treatment orders associated with Resident 1 ' s skin tear.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care was provided when the ordered liquid consistency was not followed as ordered by the physician for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure increased the potential for Resident 1 to experience aspiration (when food or liquid enters the airway and into the lungs by accident). Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction (stroke- disrupted blood flow to the brain causing brain tissue death). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated assessment tool) dated 1/14/25 indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 7 out of 15 which indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the order and care plan for the use of left hand splint was documented in a consistent manner for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience further loss of function on the left hand. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted May of 2024 with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on side of the body) following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding within the brain without external trauma) affecting left non-dominant side and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated assessment tool) dated 1/14/25 indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 7 out of 15 which indicated Resident 1 had severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction) for three of five sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) when: 1. Controlled medications delivered by the pharmacy for Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3 were missing and unaccounted for; and, 2. Two doses of Resident 1's Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Norco, a medication used to relieve moderate to severe pain) were missing and unaccounted for. These failures resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled medications, the potential for abuse or misuse of these medications, and the potential for not meeting the residents' therapeutic needs or worsening of their medical conditions. Findings: 1. During a review of a report from the facility submitted to the Department, dated 3/21/23, the report indicated, During our ongoing plan of correction audits .dated March 6, 2023, the following findings were made: On 3/13/23 it was reported that we are missing a medication card and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-26 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident representative for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) was informed of resident's rights when the admission agreement (a legally binding contract between the facility and a new resident or their representative which outlines the terms and conditions of their stay including the services provided, costs, and the rights and responsibilities of both parties involved) was not signed. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's representative not to receive information inorder to make informed decisions for resident 's care and treatment. Findings: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted first week of December 2024 with diagnoses including fusion of spine, lumbar region (surgery to connect two or more bones in the lower part of the spine). A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure on investigating allegations of abuse/mistreatment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when an allegation of mistreatment was not investigated. This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect vulnerable residents and provide a safe environment. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review Resident 1's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set-an assessment tool), dated 11/12/24 described Resident 1 as having clear speech, able to make herself understood and as able to understand others. Resident 1 ' s BIMS (a brief screening that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score was 14 which indicated she was cognitively intact. The MDS described Resident 1 as having no signs or symptoms of delirium or behavioral symptoms. The MDS for Functional Abilities indicated she required substantial/maximal assistance with mobility from staff. During an interview on 11/16/24 at 9:02 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
4c. A review of Resident 77's admission Record, indicated Resident 77 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with multiple diagnoses including congestive heart failure (heart does not pump blood as well as it should), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood) and anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by fear or dread out of proportion to the situation). A review of Resident 77's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 8/12/24, indicated Resident 77 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 13 out of 15 that indicated Resident 77 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 11/6/24 at 9:31 a.m. with Resident 77, Resident 77 stated food was cold night before last. A review of Resident 86's admission Record, indicated Resident 86 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that blocks airflow), fibromyalgia (chronic condition that causes pain and tenderness throughout the body) and diabetes. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the recipe for the preparation of pureed bread rolls was followed for 25 residents, who had chewing or swallowing difficulties and were on pureed diet (texture-modified, pudding like consistency), when the pureed bread served to residents was observed dry and lumpy. This failure had the potential to result in chewing difficulties and increase residents' risks for choking and/or aspiration (a condition in which food is breathed into the airway). Findings: A review of the facility's document titled, Recipe: Pureed Breads .Sweet Rolls .and Other Bread Products, dated 3/17, directed kitchen staff to measure out the number of portions needed, and then to puree it on low speed adding milk gradually, as needed to achieve the desired consistency. The recipe indicated further, Puree should reach a consistency of apple sauce. During a concurrent interview and observation of the preparation of pureed food on 11/6/24, commencing at 11 a.m., [NAME] 1 stated 25 residents received pureed diet from the kitchen due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices for four (Resident 349, Resident 97, Resident 79, and Resident 13) of 30 sampled residents when: 1. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not don a gown when performing resident care; 2. Resident 97's enteral feeding pump (pump used to deliver liquid nutrition into the digestive tract) and pole (used to hold pump up) had brown crusted material; 3. Resident 79's CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure/a breathing machine designed to increase the air pressure, keeping the airway open when the person breathes) nasal face mask was not cleaned as ordered, and; 4. A BiPAP mask (bilevel positive airway pressure, a machine that delivers air through a mask to help person with breathing) hazy from condensation, was observed inside the plastic bag on the nightstand of Resident 13. These failures had the potential to increase the spread of infection among residents. Findings: 1. Resident 349 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect, when staff referred to residents, who required assistance with eating, as feeders. This failure had the risk potential to minimize the residents self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: During an interview on 11/5/24 at 12:20 p.m. in the facility's dining room with Licensed Nurse (LN 3), LN 3 stated she was monitoring the dining room during lunch. LN 3 stated, The residents in the dining room are mostly independent but [we] do have some feeders. During an interview on 11/6/24 at 12:23 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 9) during delivery of lunch trays to residents, CNA 9 stated, Two trays are for my isolation residents and one is for my feeder. When CNA 9 was asked to verify what she had stated, CNA 9 referred to one resident as my feeder. During an interview on 11/8/24 at 8:50 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the expectation is that residents who require assistance with meals be referred to as assisted diners, not as feeders. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 106) when the wall at the head of the bed was in disrepair. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 106's psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of the admission Record for Resident 106 indicated diagnoses including history of stroke (a medical event that occurs when blood flow to the brain is disrupted, damaging brain tissue) and depression (a mental health disorder characterized by low mood or loss of interest in activities). A concurrent observation and interview was conducted on 11/5/24 at 10:33 a.m. inside Resident 106's room. There was a large hole on the wall above the bed measuring approximately 12 x 12 inches. Resident 106 stated the wall had been like that since he was admitted . A concurrent observation and interview on 11/5/24 at 3:41 p.m., Licensed Nurse (LN 6) verified there was a large hole in wall at the head of Resident 106's bed. LN 6 stated this should be fixed and it was not a good…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 14) from abuse when Resident 93 inappropriately touched Resident 14's breast. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 14 experiencing discomfort and feeling unsafe in the facility. Findings: Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses that included: Cerebral infarction (condition that results in reduced blood flow to the brain) due to embolism (blood clot) of left middle cerebral artery, and aphasia (difficulty with speech). A review of Resident 93's admission Record indicated Resident 93 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with multiple diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (disease causing nerve damage disrupting communication between the brain and the body) and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction. A review of Resident 93's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 9/4/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 79) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when the licensed staff did not accurately document the BG (blood glucose is simple sugar- the body's primary source of energy from food) reading and notify the physician of BG readings below 100 as ordered for a total of 9 days. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 79's care being compromised, and necessary medication adjustments not being addressed. Findings: A review of the admission Record for Resident 79 indicated he was admitted with a diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control). A Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 8/20/24 indicated Resident 79 was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 79's physician's order dated 11/16/23 indicated, . HOLD [medication] IF BG <100 AND NOTIFY MD [Medical Doctor]. A concurrent interview and record review was conducted on 11/7/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and maintain ability to perform ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 348) when Resident 348 was not assisted to his wheelchair prior to meals. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 348's oral intake and ability to feed himself. Findings: Resident 348 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and unsteadiness on feet. A review of Resident 348's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/4/24, indicated Resident 348 had no cognitive (ability to remember, think, and reason) impairment. A review of Resident 348's Physician Orders, dated 10/25/24, indicated, .PNA [Pneumonia, an infection of the lungs] Prevention: If not in conflict with Activity orders, Patient to be up in chair/wheelchair for all meals and 30 mins [minutes] after meals. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/6/24 at 7:29 a.m., with Resident 348 and CNA 6 (Certified Nursing Assistant 6),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was coordination of care for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 66) when Resident 66's ulcer [shallow lesion, center was yellowish with redness on the border] on the tongue area was not communicated to the physician. This failure increased the potential for Resident 66 to experience pain and discomfort due to lack of coordination with care. Findings: A review of Resident 66's admission Record indicated a diagnoses including encounter for palliative care (focuses on providing relief from pain and other symptoms of a serious illness). A review of Resident 66's clinical records indicated a care plan for open area on left lateral side of tongue dated 9/8/24 and a care plan for Hospice (a program that provides comfort, pain relief, emotional support and help with everyday tasks) services dated 10/11/24. A review of Resident 66's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for September and October 2024 indicated a clobetasol cream (steroid, reduce redness and swelling) treatment for the tongue ulcer was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the orders and the care plan for use of a left hand splint were clear and documented in a consistent manner for one of thirty sampled resident's (Resident 97). This failure had the potential for Resident 97's left hand splint to be used incorrectly causing further loss of function. Findings: A review of Resident 97's admission Record indicated Resident 97 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnosis of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on side of the body) affecting the left side due to cerebral infarction (stroke- disrupted blood flow to the brain causing brain tissue death). A review of Resident 97's Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 9/23/24, indicated Resident 97 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition) score of 4 out of 15 that indicated Resident 97 was severely cognitively impaired. A review of Resident 97's Order Summary Report indicated order dated 5/22/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document glucometer (machine to measure how much sugar is in the blood) calibration (ensures glucometer is working properly). This failure had the potential for residents' glucose readings to be inaccurate causing errors in residents' blood glucose management. Findings: A review of Unit C, Glucose Machine 2, Quality Control Record Blood Glucose Monitoring System, for September 2024 , indicated only six entries for the month. A review of Unit C, Glucose Machine 3, Quality Control Record Blood Glucose Monitoring System, for September 2024, indicated only six entries for the month. During an interview on 11/6/24 at 8:58 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 4, reviewed the glucose machine monitoring logs for glucose machine 2 and glucose machine 3 for September 2024. LN 4 confirmed that entries were missing for September 2024 for both machines. LN 4 stated the expectation is that the NOC (night) shift nurse checks the glucose machine calibration every day. LN 4 stated, If not checked we won't be getting the correct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 30 sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 117) were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects behavior, mood, thoughts or perception) when residents were prescribed antipsychotic medication without adequate indication and target behaviors. These failures resulted in the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications that could cause adverse consequences. Findings: 1. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 18 was admitted with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and major depressive disorder (loss of interest in activities causing significant impairment in daily life). A review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/15/24, indicated Resident 18 had severe cognitive impairment, had no verbal or physical behaviors directed toward others, and had no behaviors of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their medication storage policy when expired medications were not removed from a medication cart. These failures had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe and reduced potency from being used past their discard date. Findings: A review of the Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol (drugs to aide in breathing) manufacturer box indicated to discard the product one month after opening. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/7/24 at 2:38 p.m., with Licensed Nurse 10 (LN 10), in the A wing of the facility, an expired medication bottle of 4 milligram (mg, a unit of measurement) glucose (sugar) tablets with an expiration date of 10/16/24 and a Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol inhaler 250 micrograms (mcg, a unit of measurement)/50 mcg with an opened date of 8/31/24 were found in medication cart one. LN 10 confirmed the glucose tablets were expired and the inhaler was expired with an opened date of 8/31/24. LN 10 indicated medications can lose effectiveness if they are past…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 49) of 30 sampled residents' records were accurate when Resident 49's admission assessment note did not reflect Resident 49's health status. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 49 receiving care not suited to their health status. Findings: Resident 49 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses that included: Infection following a procedure, other surgical site, and Sepsis. A review of Resident 49's admission Nursing Note ([NAME]), dated 11/5/24, indicated, SKIN ASSESSMENT SHOWED OPEN AREA 0.5CM [centimeters, a unit of measurement] X 0.5 TO COCCYX [tailbone] .PICC [peripherally inserted central catheter, a device inserted into the bloodstream to give medications and take blood samples] LINE TO RUA [right upper arm], SURGICAL SITE TO POSTERIOR RT [right] HIP 19.8CM WITH 23 STAPLES. During an observation on 11/6/24 at 12:35 p.m., Resident 49 was lying in his bed wearing a gown that allowed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI, a data-driven proactive approach to improve quality of care and life for nursing home residents) Committee met with the required members for a census of 134, when the Medical Director (MED) did not attend the QAA meetings. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the quality of care for residents. Findings: A review of the facility's QAPI monthly meeting sign in sheets ranging from 11/2023 to 10/2024 indicated that the MED or their designee were not present during these meetings. During an interview on 11/8/24 at 1:39 p.m., with the Administrator (ADM) and Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated, The Medical Director doesn't usually make it. The DON confirmed that the MED did not attend the QAPI meeting in October of 2024 or the last QAPI quarter meeting. The ADM indicated that the attendance of the MED is important to help guide health care decisions in the facility. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Quality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment when a raised round plate was loose with a large center bolt extending above the plate in the center of the floor of the resident hallway. This failure had the potential for residents to trip and fall in the hallway with resulting injury. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/5/24 at 3:38 p.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN 12), observed in the center of the floor in D wing hallway an, approximately, 6 inch diameter loose round plate with large bolt extending from the plate. LN 12 pulled up on the plate and the bolt and was able to pull off the plate. Observed drain underneath. LN 12 acknowledged that the plate and bolt are a trip hazard for residents. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/5/24 at 3:41 p.m. with the Maintenance Assistant (MA), observed the 6 inch loose round plate with large bolt extending from the plate in the center of D wing hallway. The MA stated the drain underneath the plate is used to clean out clogs in the pipes. The MA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring and supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 eloped from the facility. This failure had the potential to cause harm to Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted Summer of 2023 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (a type of dementia that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and age-related cataracts (a cloudy area in the lens of your eye). During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1's family member was the Responsible Party (person who is responsible for the patient; can make decisions on their behalf). During a review of Resident 1's Change in Condition (CIC), dated 8/30/24 at 8 a.m., the CIC indicated, .She had an episode of elopement this AM [morning]. She was found next door in the courtyard of the [apartment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to ensure Resident 1's physician was notified when Resident 1 ' s Blood Glucose (main sugar in the body that gives you energy) was below 70 mg (milligram-dosage)/dl (deciliter-unit of measurement)(normal blood glucose level is 70-100mg/dl), as ordered. This failure had the potential to delay medical care and treatment for Resident 1. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included protein-calorie malnutrition (when a person does not eat sufficient calories and protein), muscle weakness, and diabetes (disease where blood sugar is too high). During a review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 2/15/24, indicated Resident 1 as able to make herself understood and able to understand others. Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a brief screening that aids in detecting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to ensure safety for one of three sampled residents, (Resident 2) when Resident 1 slapped Resident 2 on the face while both residents were in their wheelchairs at the nurse's station. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 2 physical injury and emotional distress. Findings: A review of Resident 1's clinical records indicated she was admitted to the facility fall of 2019 with multiple diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks). Her Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated she had severe cognitive impairment. A review of the State Agency's records indicated Resident 1 had three previous incidents of alleged altercations with other Residents. A review of Resident 1's care plan indicated, [Resident 1] was involved in a resident to resident altercation on 05/26/2024 .interventions .redirect resident . Resident 1's care plan did not indicate that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the authorities as required by their abuse policy/procedure and as stipulated by the regulations when a Licensed Nurse (LN 2) failed to report an allegation of Resident 1 being touched inappropriately by Resident 2 as reported to her by the victim. This failure resulted in 4 (four) days delay in investigations and caused Resident 1 to be fearful of living in the facility. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted by the facility in April 2024, with diagnoses which included depression and difficulty walking. A Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 4/23/24, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS , tests memory and recall) with a score of 13 out of 15 which indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. On 4/24/24, the Department received a report from the facility for an alleged abuse event which occurred on 4/20/24. No initial report of this event was received by the Department. The report indicated that on 4/24/24, Resident 1 alleged Resident 2 .touched me, he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with dignity and respect when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) failed to honor her wish not be changed and re-approach her later. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being accidentally hit on the face by her dirty diaper (incontinent brief) while CNA 1 was providing care to her and had the potential to minimize her dignity and self-esteem. Findings: A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility early 2023 with multiple diagnoses that included dysarthria following cerebral infarction (speech impairment that can occur after a stroke). Her Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated she was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 1's NURSE PROGRESS NOTE , effective date 4/19/24, indicated, ON 04/19/24 AT AROUND 0030, RESIDENT WAS NOTED TO BE CRYING OUT LOUD AND CNA WENT IN TO ROOM TO CHECK ON RESIDENT. PER CNA, NOTED…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices were provided to prevent falls for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2 had an unwitnessed fall. This failure resulted in Resident 2 being admitted to the acute care hospital for scratches on left face and left hip and left rib pain. Findings: A review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility fall of 2024 with multiple diagnoses that included, Diabetes Mellitus (uncontrolled blood sugar) and below knee amputation. Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated his memory was intact. A review of Resident 2's Order Listing Report indicated, Bilateral bed rails to enable mobility .Order date 4/10/24 . A review of Resident 2's Care Plan indicated the following: The Resident requires the use of side rails to assist in mobility and transfers .Date Initiated: 04/10/2024 .Interventions .Assess and document how the side rails are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-20 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to issue a written bed hold notice for one resident (Resident 1) out of 3 sampled residents, when Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], 12/19/23, and 12/20/23. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 to be prevented from returning to the facility which could cause emotional and psychological stress. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in late 2023 with diagnoses including inability to sleep, right and left below knee amputation, and left leg above knee amputation. A review of the eInteract Transfer and Bedhold Form V5, dated 12/12/23, 12/19/23, and 12/20/23, indicated Resident 1 was sent to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation .the resident or Responsible Party (RP) was not issued a written bed hold notice during the time of transfer. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/17/24 at 3:35 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was no documentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines for two of five sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 5) with confirmed Covid (+) infection (highly contagious respiratory infection), when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) did not wear the full required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while in Resident 5's isolation room when she delivered his lunch tray; and 2. Occupational Therapist (OT) did not wear the required full PPE while in Resident 4's isolation room when he brought in the wheelchair for the resident's use. These deficient practices had the potential to spread infection and disease among residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: 1.During a review of the clinical record for Resident 5, Resident 5 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acquired absence of right leg above knee, and acute osteomyelitis (inflammation of the bone). Resident 5 had ineffective breathing pattern; dyspnea (difficult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, employee file, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure their policy on background screening was followed for four of five sampled newly hired employees (consisting of Certified Nursing Assistants and Licensed Nurses), for a census of 137, when reference checks and background screening were not consistently done. This failure had the potential to put the residents' health and safety at risk. Findings: During a review of newly hired employee files, four employees had no documented evidence of reference checks being completed and two employees had no documented evidence of having background checks completed. In a concurrent interview and record review with the Administrator (ADM) on 11/2/23 starting at 1:15 p.m., the ADM confirmed four employees had no reference checks and two employees had no background checks prior to being hired. A review of the facility policy titled, Background Screening Investigations revised March 2019, indicated, Our facility conducts employment background screening checks, reference checks and criminal conviction checks on all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored locked for a census of 132, when a medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. This failure had the potential for medication misuse and drug diversion. Findings: During an observation in the B-wing hallway on 10/26/23 at 10:59 a.m., the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. During an interview in the B-wing hallway on 10/26/23 at 11:06 a.m., Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) confirmed the medication cart should have been locked when unattended. During an interview on 10/26/23 at 11:46 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the medications should have been locked when the nurse was not close by. A review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage . dated 2007, indicated, Medication rooms, cabinets and medication supplies should remain locked when not in use or attended .
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-29 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete training for dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and abstract thinking, with personality change) for a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to assure the resident received the highest practicable mental and physical well-being for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when CNA 1 did not have a record of dementia training. This failure had the potential to reduce the mental and physical well-being for Resident 1. Findings: According to the Face Sheet, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with multiple diagnosis including dementia and degeneration of the brain. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/26/23 at 12:20 p.m., the DON confirmed there were other residents with dementia in the facility, and there was no dementia training in the record indicating CNA 1 completed the dementia training. The facililty was unable to produce or provide dementia training documentation upon request. A review of the facility's policy titled, Nurse Aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment and ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from abuse when Resident 2 kicked Resident 1's wheelchair and yelled at her. This failure resulted in Resident 1's reporting being emotionally abused and had the potential to further affect her psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in the summer of 2022 with multiple diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke caused by disrupted blood flow to the brain) and diabetes. Resident 1's medical history indicated that the resident had multiple eye disorders related to diabetes which affected her vision. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment and care planning tool), dated 6/18/23, indicated that Resident 1 scored 11 out of 15 on a cognitive assessment which indicated a moderately impaired cognition. According to the MDS assessment, Resident 1 had no delusions, no memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food storage and preparation, and maintain kitchen equipment and food contact surfaces in accordance with professional standards for food safety for the 101 residents who ate facility prepared meals when: 1. One out of nine cutting boards was found with stain and deep scratches; 2. One out of two electric wall fans was found with gray particles on its blade edges; 3. A package of turkey in the refrigerator, a package of corn and a package of sausage patties (with ice crystals build-up) in the freezer were all found open and exposed to air; 4. A bag of lettuce and a bag of parsley that had changed its original color were in the refrigerator; 5. A box of bacon that was past its safe refrigeration time was in the refrigerator; 6. A bin of brown rice and a bin of thickener were found labeled with only the month and date; 7. A can opener was found with metal blade worn and had a brownish build-up; and 8. One out of two ice machines was found with brownish-blackish build-up around the edges of the cover and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their medication storage policy when: 1a. A medication storage refrigerator was left unlocked and unattended, with the potential for access by unlicensed staff or facility residents. 1b. One medication cart was left unlocked and unattended, with the potential for access by unlicensed staff or facility residents. 2a. Medications requiring storage at room temperature were kept in a medication room without monitoring the room temperature, a thermometer, or a temperature log with the potential for negative impact on potency of the stored medications. 2b. Medications requiring storage in the refrigerator were kept at a temperature lower than the recommended temperature range, with the potential for a negative impact on effectiveness of the medications stored in the refrigerator. 3a. Loose, unlabeled, and undated pills were found in the medication carts, with potential for medication errors. 3b. Pharmaceutical products with shortened expiration dates were found without open date labels, with the potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had the specific competencies of the dietary function when: 1) Maintenance department was unfamiliar with cleaning of ice machines, and 2) Two out of 2 dietary staff were unable to correctly state the sanitizing procedure of manual dish washing. This had the potential of leading to food borne illness for the 101 residents who ate facility prepared meals. Findings: 1) During an interview on 6/6/23 at the ice machine in the hallway leading to unit A, at 11:21 a.m. with Maintenance Staff (MS), he stated that he was responsible for taking care of the ice machines. He stated cleaning was done monthly unless it was needed sooner and showed the antibacterial wipes that were used to clean the ice bin. When asked about the internal cleaning process he admitted he was unsure and proceeded to print out the cleaning instructions. Upon review of the process, he admitted the steps were not always done due to lack of training. The contracted outside vendor equipment technician (OVET) was onsite inspecting the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the dignity and privacy of 1 of 22 (Resident 360) sampled residents when Resident 360's nephrostomy (a tube inserted into the kidney to drain urine) drainage bag was not covered. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 360 experiencing embarrassment. Findings: A review of Resident 360's Resident Face Sheet indicated he was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with multiple diagnoses including malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumor) of the spinal cord and prostate, chronic kidney disease (kidneys cannot filter the blood as well as they should), and artificial opening of the urinary tract (diverts urine when the normal flow out of the body is blocked). A review of Resident 360's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) Cognitive Patterns, dated 5/30/23, indicated Resident 360 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-tool to assess cognition) score of 12 out of 15 which indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired. A review of Resident 360's MDS Functional Status, dated 5/30/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) (part of the MDS, an assessment tool) was completed within 14 days of enrollment in a hospice program for one resident (Resident 34), for a census of 102. This failure had the potential for plan of care not to be updated to meet the current needs of Resident 34. Findings: A review of Resident 34's clinical record indicated a primary diagnosis of encounter for palliative care-Hospice care (a specialized medical care focused on providing relief from pain and other symptoms of a serious illness). Further review of Resident 34's clinical records indicated the following: - a physician order, dated 4/14/23 indicated, ADMIT TO [name of hospice agency] .WITH TERMINAL DX [diagnosis] .; and - a progress note, dated 4/14/23 indicated, [Resident 34] WAS PLACED ON [name of hospice agency] EARLIER THIS SHIFT. [Medical Doctor] NOTIFIED . In a concurrent interview and record review on 6/7/23 at 2:56 p.m., the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) confirmed Resident 34 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to guide care) was accurate for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 26) when the Skin Conditions section did not indicate that Resident 26 had a venous stasis ulcer (wound on the leg caused by damaged veins). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 26 not receiving appropriate care and interventions. Findings: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 26 was readmitted to the facility mid 2021 with diagnoses including high blood pressure and high blood sugar. A review of Resident 26's MDS for Cognitive Patterns, dated 3/7/23 indicated, he had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 26's MDS for Skin Conditions, dated 3/7/23, 12/5/22, and 9/4/22, were marked 0 for total number of venous and arterial ulcers present. A review of Resident 26's Skilled Nursing Facility Custodial Rounding Note, dated 1/5/23 indicated .Chronic RLE (Right Lower Extremity) venous stasis wound .Seen by [Name of Hospital] wound RN (Registered Nurse)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 1) when she did not have a Care Plan that addressed her hospice needs after being admitted to hospice services. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet hospice and nursing care needs. Findings: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility early 2023 with diagnoses including heart failure and high blood pressure. Her clinical records also indicated she was admitted to hospice services on 5/19/23. Her Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) for Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) was done 5/25/23. A review of Resident 1's Comprehensive Care Plan was conducted on 6/9/23. Resident 1's Comprehensive Care plan did not include a Hospice Care Plan to address her Hospice care needs. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/9/23 at 9:30 a.m., with the Licensed Nurse (LN) 7, the LN 7 verified that Resident 1 did not have a Care Plan for hospice. She stated, typically care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards for one resident (Resident 64) of 22 sampled residents when staff did not use two resident identifiers during medication pass. This failure reduced the facility's potential to prevent medication errors. Findings: A review of Resident 64's face sheet (medical record summarizing basic resident information), dated 6/6/23, indicated, the resident was admitted in summer of 2019 with multiple diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of the endometrium (cancer in the lining of the uterus), chronic kidney disease (a disease characterized by damaged kidneys unable to filter blood as they should), and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). A review of Resident 64's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 3/21/23, indicated resident had no memory problems. During medication pass observation on 6/6/23 at 8:32 a.m., in Resident 64's room, Licensed Nurse (LN 1) was observed giving prescribed medications to Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 50) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards and practice, when: 1. The physician's orders to notify him of resident's weight gain were not followed consistently; 2. The physician was not informed of Resident 50's refusals to be weighed every morning; 3. Resident 50's refusals of daily weights were not addressed in his personalized at risk for impaired fluid balance care plan; and 4. Nurses performed manual disimpaction (digital evacuation of a fecal mass) without a physician order. These failures had the potential to contribute to Resident 50 being admitted to the hospital with fluid overload (a condition where you have too much fluid volume in your body) and had the potential to put Resident 50's health at risk for injury. Findings: According to the admission records, Resident 50 was admitted to the facility earlier this year with multiple diagnoses, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent 1 of 22 (Resident 357) sampled residents from developing a Stage 3 (full thickness skin loss that extends to the subcutaneous, fat layer) Pressure Ulcer (PU-injury to skin and underlying tissue due to pressure). This failure caused Resident 357 to have a worsening PU with the potential to develop infection or experience pain. Findings: A review of Resident 357's Resident Face Sheet, indicated Resident 357 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with multiple diagnoses including bilateral osteoarthritis (wearing down of the cartilage at the end of bones causing stiffness and pain) of knees, diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), morbid obesity (excessive body fat), and Stage 2 (an open wound) sacral (area between lower back and tailbone) PU. A review of Resident 357's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) Cognitive Patterns, dated 5/23/23, indicated Resident 357 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition) score of 15 out 15 which indicated Resident 357 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5% (percent) for two sampled residents (Resident 64, and Resident 57) when: 1. For Resident 64, a licensed staff was stopped from administering a double dose of prescribed cetirizine (a medication used to treat allergy symptoms). 2. For Resident 57, a licensed staff did not follow auxiliary pharmacy label warning to administer diltiazem extended-release capsule (a medication used to treat heart condition) on an empty stomach and administered medication after breakfast. These failures resulted in two errors identified out of 28 opportunities during the observation of medication administration; the facility medication error rate was 7.14 %. Findings: 1. During an observation of medication administration on 6/6/23 at 8:32 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN 1) prepared and administered Resident 64's medications and she took two tablets of cetirizine 10 mg (unit of mass) into medicine cup instead of one tablet prescribed in the order. LN 1 completed initial count of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were followed when: 1. Staff did not perform hand hygiene during medication administration. 2. Staff did not disinfect the blood pressure cuff between use on different residents. These failures had the potential of increased transmission of infections among staff and residents. Findings 1. During observation on the C wing on 6/6/23 at 8:32 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN 1) administered medications to Resident 64. LN 1 failed to wash or sanitize her hands prior to room entry, after changing gloves, and upon exiting the resident's room. In an interview with the LN 1 on 6/6/23 at 12:30 p.m., LN 1 acknowledged not conducting hand hygiene during medication pass with Resident 64. LN 1 stated that she did not conduct hand hygiene when gloves were removed. A review of the facility's policy, titled, Hand Hygiene Program, revised 6/6/20, indicated, All personnel shall follow established hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection and disease to other personnel, residents, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-06-09 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate time to fully review the Arbitration Agreement (a document that designates a third party to resolve a dispute between others) for 3 of 3 sampled residents or their representative (Resident 356, Resident 404 and Resident 403's RPs) when the Arbitration Agreement they signed did not include the verbiage that they had the right to rescind the agreement within thirty (30) calendar days of signing. This failure had the potential for the residents to not fully understand the agreement. Findings: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 356 was recently admitted to the facility with diagnoses including high blood pressure. His Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) Cognitive Patterns, dated 6/8/23, indicated he was cognitively intact. During an interview on 6/9/23 at 9:04 a.m. with the Resident 356, he stated he could not remember if he was told that he could cancel the arbitration agreement in 30 days if he decided to cancel. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 404 was recently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CYPRESS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| JACKSON, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/29/2023 |
| JACKSON, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/29/2023 |
| SANOFSKY, JACK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/29/2023 |
| AGBUNAG, DYAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/27/2025 |
| CHEEMA, CHANDANDEEP | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2023 |
| TUIFUA, BENJAMIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/29/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $340K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555098. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.