No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Asbury Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

2257 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95825 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 139 certified beds · (916) 649-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (916) 649-2000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1 Scripps Dr · (916) 927-1114 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2345 Fair Oaks Blvd · (916) 480-6705 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2339 FAIR OAKS BLVD
Place of worship
2300 Sierra Blvd · (916) 488-1122

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.5%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.6%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.6%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.6%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.7%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.7%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.0%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.322.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.221.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 213 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 71.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 142 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.9%CMS range 43.4–56.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 8.2–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 5.3–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.66
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.41
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.62
RN hoursweekends
45.2%
Total nursing turnover
36.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 139 beds and averages 134.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.41 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.58 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-26)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when:Resident 1's PET/CT (Positron Imaging Tomography/Computed Tomography - an imaging test that combines metabolic data with detailed structural images) scan preparation was not followed as ordered by the physician; and,Resident 1 was transferred to a different hospital contrary to the physician-ordered hospital.These failures had the potential to result in complications during Resident 1's procedure, and had the potential to result in confusion regarding Resident 1's location for continuity of care.Findings:1.During a review of Resident 1's admission records, the records indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in April 2026 with diagnoses that included ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI - heart attack caused by a total blockage of a heart artery) and diplopia (the perception of two images of a single object). Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to administer medication for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's ordered medication, Propranolol hydrochloride (Propranolol HCl, a medication that helps slow down the heart and reduce the effects of stress hormones on the body), was not available during medication administration.This failure had the potential to cause Resident 1 to experience worsening tremors.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated that the resident was admitted on 4/26 with diagnoses of multiple fractures and autistic disorder (a developmental condition that affects communication, social skills, and behavior).A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Record (OSR) dated 4/14/26 indicated that Resident 1 had the capacity to understand choices and make health care decisions. The OSR also indicated that Resident 1 was ordered Propranolol HCl 10 mg (milligram, unit of measurement) by mouth twice a day for tremors.A review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2026 indicated that on 5/15/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for two of 30 sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 62) when:1. Resident 18's call light was not within reach and was not appropriate; and,2. Resident 62's call light system was not appropriate.This failure placed Resident 18 and Resident 62's safety at risk and had the potential for the residents' needs to be not met.Findings:1. A review of Resident 18's clinical record indicated Resident 18 was admitted June of 2013 and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions causing memory loss and confusion), dementia (memory loss that interferes with daily functions), and muscle weakness.A review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) Cognitive Patterns, dated 3/12/26, indicated Resident 18 was rarely/never understood. A review of Resident 18's MDS Functional Abilities, dated 3/12/26, indicated Resident 18 was dependent with oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve mobility and prevent decline in range of motion (ROM) for one out of 30 sampled residents (Resident 13) when Resident 13's restorative nursing program (RNA program- interventions that actively focuses on achieving and maintaining optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning) frequency was not followed.This failure had the potential for Resident 13 to experience a decline in range of motion or impairment in mobility.Findings:A review of Resident 13's clinical record indicated Resident 13 was admitted March of 2021 and had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition causing too much sugar in the blood), polyneuropathy (a condition characterized by damage to multiple peripheral nerves causing numbness, burning pain, and muscle weakness), and muscle weakness.A review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) Cognitive Patterns, dated 3/19/26, indicated Resident 13 had a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 30 sampled residents (Resident 147) received appropriate pain management services consistent with professional standards of practice, facility's policy and procedure (P&P), and physician's orders when Resident 147's pain medication orders were not consistently followed. This failure had the potential for Resident 147 to experience unrelieved pain and/or over-medication and not attain her highest practicable well-being.Findings:A review of Resident 147's clinical record indicated Resident 147 was admitted March of 2026 and had diagnoses that included fracture (a break in the continuity of a bone) of the right femur (thigh bone), Pain due to internal orthopedic prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, muscle weakness, and rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic autoimmune disorder causing systemic inflammation, pain, and stiffness, primarily targeting joint linings).A review of Resident 147's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) Cognitive Patterns, dated 3/21/26, indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure strict controls were maintained for the accounting, storage, and documenting of controlled substances (medications with high potential for abuse and addiction under strict government control) as evidenced by:Medication physical inventory counts did not reconcile with the controlled substance record (CSR, for an inventory count sheet to record usage of controlled medications) for six medications for Residents 149, 155, 125, 166, and 133 during an inspection of two out of three medication carts sampled.Discontinued controlled substances remained stored in one of two medication refrigerators and one of three medication carts sampled for Residents 163,165,50, 69, 15 and 7.Medication Administration Records (MARs) did not reconcile with the Controlled Substance Records (CSRs) for two of four residents sampled (Residents 20 and 67). The medications were signed out on the CSRs, indicating removal from inventory, but there was no corresponding documentation on the MARs showing the residents received the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility had a medication error rate of 6.45% when four medication errors occurred out of 62 opportunities during the medication administration for three out of nine residents observed (Residents 9, 157 and 112).Resident 9 received a dose of cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3 supplement, used to prevent or treat Vitamin D deficiency) 25 times greater than prescribed. Resident 157 received the wrong dose of Humulin R (Regular Insulin, a short acting insulin used to lower blood sugar), and the ordered dose of Humulin N (NPH Insulin, an intermediate acting insulin providing basal coverage) was not administered.Resident 112 received acetaminophen (an over the counter medication to reduce fever and mild pain) not in accordance with the prescribed pain level.These failures resulted in incorrect medication doses, omitted medication and medications administered not per the physician orders and had the potential to adverse drug effect, low or high blood sugar levels and inadequate pain management.Findings:1. During a medication observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and diagnostic agents were properly labeled according to manufacturer guidelines when:Several opened and undated medications, and one opened and undated container of glucose test strips, were observed stored in 2 of 3 medication carts sampled.One opened and undated Forteo pen (pre filled injection device used to deliver specialty medication to treat osteoporosis, a condition of weakened bones), was observed stored in 1 medication room refrigerator of two medication rooms sampled.This failure had the potential for residents to receive ineffective, expired, or unstable medications, and for staff to use expired or inaccurate glucose test strips when monitoring residents' blood glucose levels.Findings: 1a. During an inspection of the 1 C medication cart and concurrent interview on [DATE] at 11:14 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN 5) the following medications were observed:One opened, undated vial of Insulin Glargine (long-acting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, served, or distributed in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when:Three dietary staff did not wear hair and beard restraints; andOne dietary staff did not practice hand hygiene between soiled and clean dishes during the dishwashing process.These failures had the potential to result in food contamination which could cause illness for 132 residents who received food prepared from the facility kitchen. During an observation on 3/24/26 at 8:30 and 11:00 a.m., Dietary Aide (DA) 2 wore a beanie in the kitchen without a hair restraint and hair was exposed in the back and sides of the head. DA 1 and [NAME] (CK) 1 had beards without beard restraints during food preparation.During an interview on 3/24/26 at 8:45 and 11 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS confirmed DA 2 was wearing a beanie with exposed hair and was not wearing a hair net and DA 1 and CK 1 had exposed beard hair and were not wearing beard restraints. The DS stated they should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when;1. A facility staff did not wear required personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing high contact care and handling the indwelling catheter (a thin, hollow tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain urine and is left in place for a period of time) for one out of 30 sampled residents (Resident 130) who was on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP- also known as enhanced standard precaution/ESP, infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs- bacteria that resist treatment with more than one antibiotic] that employs targeted gown and glove use);2. Money was stored in a medication cart, creating a risk for cross contamination of medications, and3. The facility failed to perform PICC line (PICC, peripherally inserted central catheter. Long, thin tube inserted through a vein in the arm, and is passed through to the larger veins near the heart) dressing changes, as ordered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin (a medication used to lower blood sugar) according to the sliding scale in a timely manner (a set of instructions for administering insulin dosages based on specific blood glucose readings) when the insulin was administered more than 2 hours after the blood glucose reading for one of nine residents observed during the medication pass (Resident 157). This failure created the potential for inaccurate dosing and adverse effects from uncontrolled blood sugar.Findings: During a medication observation on 3/23/26 at 10:06 a.m. at the 1 A medication cart, Licensed Nurse (LN 4) was observed preparing 10 medications, for Resident 157, which included Regular Insulin (short acting insulin). At 10:15 a.m., LN 4 was observed administering the Regular Insulin to Resident 157's left lower abdomen. A review of Resident 157's physician order indicated the following order for Regular Insulin 100 unit/milliliter (concentration) to be given as per sliding scale, dated 3/21/26: Finger Stick Glucose (FSG, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 30 sampled residents (Resident 160) received care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and facility's policy and procedure (P&P) when Resident 160's suprapubic catheter (a tube that drains urine from the bladder through a small incision in the lower abdomen) bag was left on the floor.This failure had the potential for Resident 160 to develop infection and possible urinary catheter complications.Findings:A review of Resident 160's clinical record indicated Resident 160 was admitted March of 2026 and had diagnoses that included malnutrition (state of poor nutrition that occurs when the body does not receive enough or the right nutrients to function properly), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- the prostate gland grows larger than normal potentially causing urinary problems), and obstructive and reflux uropathy (occurs when the urine cannot drain through the urinary tract).A review of Resident 160's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for a census of 134 residents, when flies were observed in the residents' rooms.This failure decreased the facility's potential to maintain a pest free environment for the residents.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 8/14/25, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2025.A review of Resident 2's admission Record, dated 8/14/25, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2021.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/14/25 at 9:46 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1's room was observed. Resident 1 confirmed and stated there were flies in the room all the time. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/14/25 at 9 a.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2's room was observed. The sliding door was opened and had no screen. Resident 2 confirmed and stated there were flies flying around the room.During an interview on 8/14/25 at 9:48 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA), CNA confirmed the sliding door in Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was promoted for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the resident was left with a soiled brief for an extended period of time. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 not attaining his highest practicable social, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to facility summer 2016 with diagnosis of Muscle Atrophy and Wasting (weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS – a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 2/11/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had incontinence. During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan Report , dated 1/25, the care plan indicated, The resident is total dependent on 1 staff for toileting. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/20/25 at 10:40 a.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP) outside Resident 1's room, the IP confirmed there was a strong odor coming from Resident 1's room. During an observation on 3/20/25 at 10:43 a.m. in Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect 3 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 4, and Resident 6) from abuse by peer residents for a census of 136 when; 1. Resident 1 slapped Resident 2 in the face; 2. Resident 3 punched Resident 4 in the Thigh; and, 3. Resident 3 expressed verbal slurs to Resident 6. This failure resulted in 3 sampled residents being abused by peer residents and had the potential to cause physical injury and negatively impact their psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's admission record , indicated Resident 1 was admitted in January 2025 with multiple diagnoses including Major depressive disorder (a disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest) and Schizophrenia (a chronic mental condition that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-Federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 1/15/2025, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu or spreadsheet (a menu excel sheet that indicated what items and portions to be served for each prescribed diet) was followed for the therapeutic diets during the lunch meal distribution on 1/8/25 when: 1. 20 residents (Resident 16, 17,18, 26, 28, 41, 44, 47, 60, 62, 64, 71, 80, 82, 92, 98, 100, 101, 110, and 386) with CCHO (control carbohydrate) diets (diet uses for person with diabetes and maintain a stable sugar level throughout the day) with regular portion received margarine instead they should not receive margarine, 2. Two Residents (Resident 34 and 37) with CCHO, Renal (refer to the kidney) diet (diet that manage a person with diabetes and kidney disease) did not receive baked fish and/or wheat roll but they should have as indicated on the spreadsheet, 3. Nine Residents (Resident 15, 21, 25, 56, 74, 95, 96, 106, and 109) with puree diet (diet with texture that is soft and smooth and prepares in a food processor or blender for people who have difficulty chewing and/or swallowing)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety when: 1. The ice machine was not clean, 2. Various sizes kitchenware in the clean and ready-to-use storage areas: a. Were stacked and stored wet b. Had food particles 3. An air gap was not found on the food production sink, 4. Dietary Aide (DA) 1 did not verbalize the process of manual dishwashing correctly, 5. [NAME] (CK) 1 and CK 2 had beard and did not have beard restraint. These failures had the potential to result in food contamination which could cause illness in 128 out of 128 medically vulnerable residents who received and consumed food from the facility kitchen. Findings: 1. A concurrent observation and interview on 1/7/25 at 10:03 a.m. with Dietary Assistant Manager (DAM) and Director of Environmental Services (DES) regarding the ice machine was conducted. DAM stated the maintenance department was responsible for monthly cleaning and sanitizing for ice storage bin and the outside vendor was responsible for the deep cleaning (cleaning and sanitizing the machinery parts on the top…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean environment for the residents and visitors when one of two garbage dumpsters, located outside the facility, was not closed securely with the dumpster lids. This failure had the potential for an unsafe environment for the residents and visitors due to possible pest infestation and spread diseases in the facility. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 1/7/25 at 8:58 a.m. with Dietary Assistant Manager (DAM), observed one out of two outside garbage bins was covered with lids but not securely completely covered. The lids lacked integrity to securely cover the bin and left gaps on both sides. DAM confirmed and agreed the lids could not securely cover the bin. She stated it was not acceptable. During an interview with Registered Dietitian (RD) on 1/9/25 at 1:45 p.m., RD stated the dumpster garbage bins should be covered tightly with the lids. She added the bins should cover without any opening or gaps to prevent issues from the pests and rodents. A review of facility policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Accurate accountability and effective storage of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction) when random controlled medication audits for three out of four residents (Residents 58, 65, and 69) did not reconcile. The medications were signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but were not documented accurately on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate they were given to the residents. 2. Medication accountability when two out of four medication carts' controlled drug sign-in/sign-out sheets (a sheet used to reconcile inventory of controlled medications in the medication cart by the outgoing and incoming nurse during a shift change) were missing signatures of the outgoing and incoming nursing shift; 3. An efficient system was in place to accurately document and secure emergency medications (E-Kit) for a census of 132. 4. Medications were secured safely when multiple bottles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 31 sampled residents (Resident 7, Resident 128, and Resident 25) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medication (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) when: 1. Resident 7 received Seroquel (an antipsychotic to treat mental illness) without implementation of non-pharmacological (non-drug) interventions in an effort to lower the dose or discontinue the medication; and 2. Resident 128 received Seroquel without an adequate indication for its use. 3. Resident 25's behavior order was different from the behavior being monitored for the use of Lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication) and there was no documented evidence of non pharmacological interventions used when behavior occurred. These failures had the potential to result in unnecessary use of medication. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 7's medical record indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was not 5% or greater when the error rate was 12.5% based on four medication errors out of 32 opportunities observed during a medication pass for three of five residents (Resident 12, 104, and 110). These failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders or manufacturer's specifications and potential to affect the resident's clinical conditions. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 1/7/25 at 8:42 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), LN 2 was observed preparing 11 medications, including diclofenac gel (used to relieve joint pain) 4 grams (g, a unit of measurement) for Resident 110. LN 2 used a dosing card to measure topical medication. LN 2 measured 2 g. A review of Resident 110's medical record indicated a physician's order dated 12/30/24, for diclofenac gel apply 4 g topically (applied to the skin) three times a day to affected joints for arthritic pain (swelling and tenderness of one or more joints). During a concurrent interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: -Medications were stored in accordance with manufacturer specifications; -Opened medications were dated with an open and discard date, to ensure they were not used beyond the discard date; -Expired and discontinued medications were disposed of in accordance with facility policy and procedure (P&P); -Medication carts were kept clean and orderly and single resident multidose medications were appropriately labeled with resident specific labels to ensure they were used for the right resident; -Controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction) were stored in accordance with facility P&P; and -Medication carts were kept securely locked when left unattended. - Resident 81's inhaler was observed at the resident's bedside. The deficient practices had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe or reduced potency from being used past their discard date or improper storage, incorrect medication, and diversion or misuse of medications from not being securely stored in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0840 — pattern
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services furnished by outside resources had written agreements when three out of 31 sampled residents' (Resident 15, Resident 36, and Resident 51) dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidneys have failed) services were provided without existing agreements with dialysis clinics. This failure had the potential to result in the lack of responsibility and accountability in the dialysis services received by Resident 15, Resident 36, and Resident 51. Findings: 1a. During a review of Resident 36's admission record, the record indicated Resident 36 was admitted in October 2024 with diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease (ESRD, irreversible kidney failure) and dependence on renal dialysis. Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) indicated Resident 36 had intact cognition. During a review of Resident 36's care plan, initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for a census of 132 when: 1. Resident 36's nasal cannula (a medical device with two prongs that is connected to an oxygen source used to deliver supplemental oxygen directly into the nostrils) was observed on the floor when not in use; 2. Resident 46's nasal cannula was observed on the floor when not in use; 3. Dust particles were observed on the vents above the clean linen area and dust particles and moisture were observed at the back of the washers in the laundry room; 4. Resident 71's nebulizer (machine that transforms liquid medication into an inhalable mist that allows it to reach the lungs directly) tubing and mask was not stored properly, not labeled with date changed, and oxygen concentrator (machine that converts surrounding air into oxygen) humidifier bottle (used to humidify supplemental oxygen) was not labeled with date changed; and, 5. Resident 3's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the building and equipment were maintained in a functional and operable manner when pipes in the laundry room were dirty, corroded, and leaking. This failure had the potential to result in the facility not providing safe and sanitary handling of laundry items used by residents for a census of 132. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/9/25 at 11:49 a.m. with Laundry Staff (LS) and the Director of Environmental Services (DES) in the laundry room, the floor at the back of the washer was observed wet, pipes were observed with dust particles, one pipe was observed corroded and with greenish color. LS and the DES confirmed the observation. The DES stated the leakage was coming from the corroded pipe and stated, We called the company but no confirmation on when will be repaired, we think the company have to replace the pipe, there should not be leakage. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/9/25 at 11:56 a.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure informed consents were obtained from authorized resident representative for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 97) when Resident 97's consent to treat, Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done at the end-of life), and psychotropic medication (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) consents were not signed by Resident 97's Responsible Party (RP). This failure increased the potential for Resident 97's RP to not be informed of the risks and benefits of treatment and medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 97's admission records, the records indicated Resident 97 was admitted in January 2024 with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and dementia (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect and keep secure, when not in use, confidential resident health data and records for a census of 132. This failure had the potential to expose and disclose personal and confidential health information to unauthorized individuals. Findings: During an observation on 1/7/25 at 4:30 p.m. in hallway 2A. Medication Cart 2A's computer was observed unattended and with a resident profile open in-between resident rooms facing out towards the resident hallway. During an interview on 1/7/25 at approximately 4:31 p.m. with Licensed Nurse 7 (LN 7), LN 7 stated he was aware the computer was left unlocked and unattended with resident records accessible. He stated resident records should never be left open and accessible to unauthorized individuals and that doing so would be a violation of their confidentiality. During an interview on 1/8/25 at 10:58 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated that it was her expectation that nursing staff ensured resident records were not visible to any unauthorized staff.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of bed hold for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 15) when Resident 15 was transferred to the hospital and Resident 15's Responsible Party (RP) was not provided written notice of bed hold for return to the facility. This failure had the potential for Resident 15's RP to not be informed of Resident 15's right to return to the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 15's admission Record indicated Resident 15 was initially admitted to the facility in August 2022 with multiple diagnoses including end stage renal disease (loss of kidney function, kidneys cannot remove waste from the body) with dependence on dialysis (treatment that removes waste and excess fluid from the body), chronic respiratory failure (lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate carbon dioxide), and heart failure (heart does not pump blood as well as it should). The admission Record indicated Resident 15 was readmitted to the facility in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of quality as stipulated by their admission policy and procedure to ensure accuracy of admission medications for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 487) when a psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medication order was not carried over upon admission. This failure resulted in Resident 487 not receiving psychotropic medication for eight days and increased the potential for Resident 487 to experience emotional distress. Findings: A review of Resident 487's admission record, indicated Resident 487 was admitted [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including aftercare following joint replacement surgery. A review of Resident 487's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 1/3/25, indicated Resident 487 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 15 out of 15 indicating the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 51) received necessary foot care when toenails were long and thick. This failure increased the potential for Resident 51 to experience pain and infection. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 51 was initially admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) with diabetic chronic kidney disease (high blood sugar levels damage the kidney's ability to function). A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) indicated Resident 51 was cognitively intact with a score of 15 out of 15. A review of Resident 51's physician order dated 12/16/24 indicated, May receive podiatry care [the foot doctor examines the foot and ankle to correct problems identified] Q…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an ongoing communication and collaboration for the development and implementation of the dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) care plan by the facility and dialysis staff for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 36), when Resident 36' s anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells) medication was not communicated with the dialysis clinic and was signed as given at dialysis. This failure resulted in the facility not being aware of Resident 36's current anemia management and decreased the facility's potential to monitor Resident 36 for the medication's effectiveness and side effects. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission record, the record indicated Resident 36 was admitted in October 2024 with diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease (ESRD, irreversible kidney failure), dependence on renal dialysis, and anemia. Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist (CP) identified and reported to the facility irregularities related to the medication regimen for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 128) during the Medication Regimen Review (MRR). This failure resulted in inadequate monitoring and had the potential for medications not being optimized for best possible health outcome. Findings: A review of Resident 128's medical record indicated Resident 128 was admitted to the facility in 12/9/24 with diagnoses including Major Depressive Disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), schizophrenia unspecified (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and diabetes (a chronic disease that affects how the body uses sugar for energy). A review of Resident 128's medical record indicated the following physician's order for Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication to treat mental illness): -Seroquel 25 mg (milligrams, a unit of measurement): give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the special dietary requirement for two residents (Resident 106 and 108) during the lunch observation on 1/7/25. This deficient practice had the potential to result in meal dissatisfaction and decreasing meal intake that may lead to further compromising medical and nutrition status and/or weight loss of residents. Findings: A review of the admission Record for Resident 106 indicated Resident 106 had other diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a dining observation on 1/7/25 at 12:18 p.m., Resident 106's meal ticket (a ticket including resident's diet, date, allergies, specific food and beverage items, dislikes, and likes) indicated Puree (food has been ground to a soft, smooth consistency) with nectar thick liquids (like heavy syrup consistency) and Resident 106's dislikes included broccoli. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/7/25 at 12:27 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 stated the puree green vegetable in Resident 106's plate was broccoli. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failure to ensure a call light (a device used by a resident to signal the need for help) were accessible for 2 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 82), when Resident 22 and Resident 82 were not physically able to use the call light provided when it was out of reach. These failures had the potential to result in unmet resident needs and delayed staff response. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 22's admission record, indicated Resident 22 was admitted with multiple diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness. A review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 12/17/24, indicated Resident 22 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 11 out of 15 indicated moderate cognitive impairment and resident 22's mobility was for Substantial/maximal assistance (staff does more than half of the effort for any mobility needs). During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify that one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) left facility without staff awareness or physician order for Leave of Absence (LOA), when Resident 1 left facility with unidentified person and was not known to have left facility until he returned to the facility on his own. This failure resulted in Resident 1 going to an unsafe environment with risk for harm and injury. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with multiple diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis (infection in a bone) of left ankle and foot, pressure injury to right hip, and generalized muscle weakness. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 6/20/24, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 1's MDS, Functional Abilities and Goals, dated 6/20/24, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) for a census of 134 residents when: 1. A facility staff did not wear required personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing catheter care for Resident 1, who was on Enhanced Standard Precautions (ESP- also known as Enhanced Barrier Precaution/EBP). 2. Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3, who were on ESP, did not have required PPE readily available outside the room. These failures resulted in increased risk for cross-contamination (transfer of bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and may cause infections among residents. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility early 2024 with multiple diagnosis which included benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH – enlarged prostate that can cause urinary difficulty) and Parkinson ' s Disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-06 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote individual care and dignity, when the staff failed to respond to three of five sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 5), who needed assistance with personal care and the staff did not answer their call lights in a timely manner. This failure resulted in the residents' needs not being met, they experienced discomfort, embarrassment, and felt helpless. Findings: During a phone interview with Resident 1's family member (FM) on 8/1/24 at 10:20 a.m., FM stated that his father did not receive proper staff assistance with personal care while residing in the facility. The FM stated his father had to wait for an hour or longer to have his call light answered which caused him to feel anxious and frustrated. The FM stated that his father could maintain his bladder and bowel control and make his needs known, but by the time staff responded to his calls, he had already wet or soiled himself because he could not hold it any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report the result of the 5-day investigation within the required timeframe for two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when Resident 1 scratched Resident 2. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide appropriate corrective actions to safeguard the health and safety of the residents. Findings: A review of Resident 1's progress note, dated 5/31/24 at 10:09 a.m. indicated, At [9:15 a.m.] .[Resident 1] had gotten into an altercation with her room mate [sic] .[Resident 2] approached [Resident 1] exclaiming 'get out of here! Get out of here!' [Resident 2] then swiped her hand towards [Resident 1]. In response [Resident 1] grabbed [Resident 2]'s hand and swiped her own hand towards [Resident 2]'s chest, making contact with her skin and leaving a wound of 3 prominent scratch marks on her chest . The facility was unable to provide the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) with documented evidence the facility submitted a summary of the investigation within 5 working days of the incident and the appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and documentation review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for the residents, staff, and the public when the evacuation routes were cluttered with carts, bedside commode, linen bins, and garbage bins in a 139-bed facility. This failure caused Resident 4 to feel unsafe in the facility and increased the potential for a delay in an evacuation should an emergent situation arise that would have the facility use this evacuation route. Findings: Review of Resident 4's clinical record, admission Record , indicated the resident was admitted to the facility for aftercare of back surgery. In an observation and concurrent interview on 5/23/24 starting at 3:23 p.m. in Resident 4's room, the resident stated that he had concerns regarding the resident safety in the building. Resident 4 stated, I want to show you something and got out of his bed and took the lead in his wheelchair to one of the emergency exit doors. It was a double exit door with a sign on the window of the door, EMERGENCY EXIT ONLY. NO RESIDENT IS ALLOWED THIS WAY. Below it, another…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care when the physician order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was not implemented according to the facility's policy and procedures. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to have received a thickened liquid diet despite the physician order and/or the resident's preference. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission Record, the record indicated the resident was a long-term resident in the facility since 2011 with diagnoses that included difficulty swallowing after a stroke. During an observation and interview on 3/18/24 at 10:31 a.m., Resident 1 was observed lying in bed and stated the facility kept bringing her thickened liquids that she didn't like. The resident stated her sister brought her chicken, soda, [Brand Name] hamburgers but she did not, choke a bit. The resident stated, I know what I can eat, and indicated staff did not believe that she no longer needed thickened liquids. Resident 1 stated she spoke to her doctor a few weeks ago about her improvement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-18 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) had access to water. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to be thirsty and increased the potential for dehydration, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, skin infections, confusion and disorientation. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was a long-term resident in the facility with diagnoses that included stroke, lung disease, and heart problems. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/18/24 starting at 10:31 a.m., in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was observed lying in her bed and reported that she had skin issues. The resident uncovered the blanket and exposed her right leg that was wrapped in a white dressing from below her knee down to the ankle. The resident indicated she had frail skin. The resident then moaned, I am so thirsty and they don't give me water. The resident's mouth had stringy saliva and her lips partially peeled which appeared to be dry. There was a about 10-ounce size sippy cup (a spouted cup)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory infection control practices were promoted for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the resident's nasal cannula (a plastic tubing that supplies oxygen to the resident through their nostrils) was found on the floor and the tubing was dated 1/18/24. These failures place Resident 1 at increased risk for respiratory infections who had already compromised lung capacity. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was a long-term resident in the facility with diagnoses that included lung disease and personal history of other infectious and parasitic diseases. During an observation on 3/18/24 at 10:31 a.m., Resident 1 was observed lying in her bed with her eyes open. Next to her bed, there was an oxygen (O2) concentrator in operation and the nasal cannula connected to the concentrator was found on the floor. There was also crumbled white tissue paper next to the nasal cannula on the floor. The nasal cannula was dated 1/18/24. The oxygen concentrator was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with dignity and respect, when Resident 1 complained that a staff member cut her hair against her wishes. This failure caused Resident 1 to feel upset and distressed. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility initial admission in early January 2022 and readmission in March 2022, with diagnoses including muscle weakness, pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) of sacral region stage 4 (the portion of spine between lower back and tailbone, Stage 4 extends to muscle, tendon, or bone), and Rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory disorder usually affecting small joints in the hands and feet). Resident 1's latest Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment and care planning tool), dated 11/3/23, indicated resident scored 13 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status, where score of 13 -15 indicated intact cognitive status. In an interview with Resident 1 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 7) when nursing staff did not follow the physician's order for foley catheter (a tube inserted through the urethra to drain urine from the bladder) care. This failure resulted in Resident 7 having multiple urinary tract infections (UTIs) within two months of admission to the facility and was sent to the acute care hospital (ACH) with severe sepsis and acute organ dysfunction (the body's extreme reaction to infection). Findings: A review of Resident 7's 'admission Record,' indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility from the ACH on 12/6/23 with diagnoses including Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (age-associated prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty) with lower urinary tract infection and urine retention. A review of Resident 7's latest Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment and care planning tool), dated 12/3/23, indicated Resident 7 scored 12 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, tests cognition)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to intervene in a timely manner to prevent an abrupt weight loss for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) when she had a pattern of meal refusals and lost 14.9 pounds (lb) in one month. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having an unplanned weight loss (14.9 lbs ) in one month and had the risk potential to have caused the resident's inability to fight infections. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early January 2022 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, pressure ulcer of sacrum (the portion of spine between lower back and tailbone region) stage 4 (the ulcer presents as full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing ), Endocarditis (inflammation of the inside lining of the heart due to bacterial infection), Rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory disorder usually affecting small joints in the hands and feet) and a recent hospitalization due to Pneumonia and COVID-19. A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention and control practices were maintained during a Covid-19 (respiratory disease caused by a virus and spread from person to person) outbreak when four staff did not properly don (put on) PPE (personal protective equipment- mask/N95 respirator). This failure had the potential to result in the spread of infections among residents and staff. Findings: During an observation and interview on 2/6/23 at 12:55 p.m., a Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA 1) was observed wearing an N95 (type of mask) mask with the top strings under the ear and the bottom string of the mask hanging under the face. When the CNA 1 was asked to explain the correct way to wear her mask, CNA 1 stated she wore it like that as she could not breathe. CNA 1 further stated that it was important to wear the mask correctly to protect herself and the residents from getting sick. During an observation and interview on 2/6/23 at 2:20 p.m., Licensed Nurse (LN 2) was observed wearing N95 mask on his chin and stated that he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely address a resident concern of missing prescription glasses for 1 (Resident #94) of 26 sampled residents. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Grievances/Complaints, Filing, revised in April 2017, revealed, 6. When applicable, upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the grievance officer will review and investigate the allegations and submit a written report if applicable of such findings to the administrator. Review of a facility policy titled, Lost and Found, revised in January 2008, revealed, 5. Resident or family complaints of missing items must be reported to the director of nursing services. The policy revealed, 7. Reports of misappropriation or mistreatment of resident property are immediately investigated. A review of Resident #94's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 09/13/2023, with diagnoses of orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation and type 2 diabetes. A review of Resident #94's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #470) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for food was not provided dairy products. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Food Preferences, dated 2023, revealed, POLICY: Resident's food preferences will be adhered to within reason. Substitutes for all foods disliked will be given from the appropriate food group. Further review of the policy indicated, PROCEDURE: Food preferences will be obtained as soon as possible though the initial resident screen. Review of a facility policy titled, Food Allergies, dated 2023, revealed, POLICY: Residents with food allergies will be identified upon admission. Further review of the policy indicated, 5. Allergies will be noted on the tray card, the resident diet profile, and posted in the kitchen and nursing station, if necessary. A review of Resident #470's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/05/2023, with diagnoses that included left femur fracture, muscle weakness, and asthma. A review of Resident #470's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of practice for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) when baclofen (drug used for muscle spasms) was ordered for him without consideration of his kidney failure. This failure had the potential risk to result in drug toxicity. Findings: According to Resident 1's 'admission Record' the facility admitted him recently with multiple diagnoses which included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD, kidneys no longer work properly) and was dependent on hemodialysis (a life sustaining procedure were a machine does some of the work of the kidneys by filtering harmful waste, salts, and fluids from the blood), diabetes and right below knee amputation. Resident 1 scored 14 out of 15 in a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, test memory and recall) contained in his Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) which indicated he was cognitively intact. A review of the Resident 1's physician orders concurrently with the Nurse Practitioner (NP) on 9/27/23, at 2:05 p.m., the NP validated another NP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for one of three residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 did not receive a shower during her stay at the facility, for a census of 132. This failure resulted to Resident 1 developing a hair knot. Findings: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including a displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (a type of break in the hip and bone moved out of position) and pathologic fracture (a break caused by underlying disease) of the right ankle. Further review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated the following: - Resident 1 had 35 days of facility stay. She stayed 17 days on the initial admission from 6/14-7/2/23 and 18 days on readmission from 7/9-7/27/23. Resident was in the acute care hospital from 7/2-7/9/23; - a Minimum Data Set (MDS, assessment tool) dated 6/20/23, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact; it was very important for Resident 1 to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CYPRESS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
JACKSON, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019
JACKSON, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019
SANOFSKY, JACKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019
BELCUIG, MAGDALENAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019
DUDLEY, ASHLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/18/2023
ERNI, EVELYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019
HILL, ARMANDOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019
JUAREZ, MELANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/16/2023
KUMAR, MUNISHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2019
PORTELA, ALICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/1992
WATSON, EVELYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
ZEPEDA, LUCIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 12%Other / private 29%

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$479per resident / day
operating cost
$14,567per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$503per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555673. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next