Gold Country Health Center
4301 Golden Center Drive, Placerville, CA 95667 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 68 certified beds · (530) 621-1100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $14,886 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-25)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.7% | 7.3% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.42 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.89 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 499 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 75.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 268 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.8%CMS range 55.9–64.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 8.8–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 75.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 72.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 75.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.1%CMS range 7.2–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 64.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.17 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement measures to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer (PU, injury to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) on the sacrum (tailbone) for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 31) when: 1. A Risk for Pressure Ulcer Care Plan was not updated; 2. Shower/Bath skin assessments were not completed as scheduled; 3. Nursing weekly summary assessments did not include direct observation of the resident's skin; and 4. Turning and repositioning documentation was not accurate. These failures resulted in Resident 31 developing a facility acquired Stage 3 (affecting the top 2 layers of the skin as well as the fatty tissue) PU. Findings: A review of Resident 31's admission record indicated she was admitted in January 2023 with diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and unspecified urinary incontinence (lack of voluntary control over urination). A review of Resident 31's clinical record included the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 13) was free of a significant medication error when tramadol (opioid medicine used for the short-term relief of moderate to severe pain) was not available for routine administration. This failure resulted in Resident 13 experiencing pain and psychosocial (the combined influence of psychological factors and the surrounding social environment on physical, emotional, and/or mental wellness) harm when pain was left untreated. Findings: A review of Resident 13's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included vertebral wedge compression fractures (a type of crush or break of the spine) of thoracic vertebrae 5 (T5) to T10 (the middle section of the spine), fracture of fourth lumbar vertebra (the lower back section of the spine), neuropathy (nerve damage which leads to pain), lung cancer, osteoporosis (a condition in which the bones become brittle)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect and keep secure when not in use confidential resident health data and records for a census of 67 residents. This failure had the potential to expose and disclose personal and confidential residents' health information to unauthorized individuals.Findings:During a medication pass observation on 9/7/25 at 9 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) 4's computer screen was observed unlocked and accessible to residents and staff passing by when she left to clarify an order. During a medication pass observation on 9/7/25 at 9:08 a.m., LN 4's computer screen was again observed unlocked and accessible to residents and staff passing by when she left to enter a resident's room. During an interview on 9/7/25 at 1:21 p.m. with LN 4, LN 4 confirmed she left the computer unlocked and unattended when she went to clarify an order and again when she entered a resident's room. During an interview on 9/8/25 at 4:31 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated nursing staff were expected to lock the cart and screen to hide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were followed for three of 26 sampled residents (Resident 7, Resident 82 and Resident 85), when:1. A lidocaine (anesthetic used to treat pain) five percent (%, a unit of measurement) patch was applied to Resident 82's lower back without date, time and initials of the nurse applying it;2. Licensed Nurse 4 (LN 4) did not identify Resident 85 prior to medication administration;3. LN 4 did not wear gloves during preparation and administration of hazardous medication; and4. Nursing staff did not clarify overlapping PRN (as needed) pain medication orders. These failures had the potential to result in inappropriate medication administration, preventable medication errors, increased risk of adverse drug events, oversedation, and resident harm or death. Findings:1.During a medication pass observation on 9/7/25 at 8:12 a.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was observed applying a topical lidocaine patch to Resident 82's lower back. ADON applied the patch without signing and dating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1. Ensure nursing staff accurately documented the removal of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction) during medication pass;2. Ensure accurate accountability and effective storage of controlled medication when random controlled medication audits for two out of two residents (Resident 14 and Resident 17) did not reconcile. The medications were signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps a record of the usage of controlled medications) but were not documented accurately on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate they were given to the residents; and,3. Demonstrate adequate safeguards were implemented to ensure chain of custody of controlled substances and limit their potential for diversion prior to final destruction. These failures resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled medications and increased potential for diversion, abuse or misuse of these medications.Findings: 1.During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 14.81 percent (%, a unit of measure) error rate when four medication errors out of 27 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for two of three Residents (Resident 82 and Resident 85). This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and increased potential to affect the residents' clinical conditions.Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 9/7/25 at 8:12 a.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was observed preparing and administering seven medications for Resident 82 which included: oxycontin (a medication given to treat pain) ER (extended release, a long acting formulation) 10 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement), Nephro vitamins (Vitamin B-Complex with Vitamin C and Folic Acid, a collection of vitamins and minerals), Senokot 8.6 mg (a medication to relieve constipation), Lidoderm 5% patch (a topical patch applied to the skin that relieves pain), Clear lax (a powder mixed with water that helps relieve constipation and helps irregular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1. Ensure multi-dose medications with shortened expiration dates were labeled correctly after use with an open date;2. Ensure medications were securely stored within manufacturer's specifications; and3. Ensure safe storage and monitoring of over the counter (OTC) medications. These failures had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe and reduced potency from being used past their discard date, incorrect medications from inadequate labeling, and unsafe or ineffective medications or biologicals from inadequate storage that was left unsupervised and open to anyone in the facility.Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 9/7/25 at 9:26 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 4 (LN 4), Resident 85's inhalers Budesonide/Formoterol or Symbicort (a prescription inhalation medication used to treat chronic lung diseases) and Tiotropium or Spiriva Respimat (a prescription medicine used as a long-term once-daily maintenance treatment) were found to be unlabeled with an open date. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the recipe for three residents of a census of 67 (Resident 16, Resident 24, and Resident 85), when an unmeasured amount of milk was added to pureed (a very smooth, lump-free, and moist consistency similar to pudding, requiring no chewing and able to be swallowed easily) rice.This failure had the potential to add extra liquids to the rice serving and decrease the intake of nutrients.Findings:A review of Resident 16's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility in 2023.A review of Resident 16's Order Summary Report, dated 8/25/25, indicated a fortified diet (added calories) order with a pureed texture and nectar thick consistency.A review of Resident 24's admission Record, indicated he was admitted to the facility in 2024 with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 24's Order Summary Report, dated 9/8/25, indicated an order for a regular large portions diet with a pureed texture and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly prepare and store food for a census of 67 residents, when:1. Stored food was found expired and unlabeled; and 2. The cool down procedure was not followed for cooked meat.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent foodborne illnesses among vulnerable residents.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/7/25 at 8:32 a.m. with the Assistant Dietary Manager (AsstDM), the following items were found:-In the dry storage: One unopened package of hamburger rolls, removed from freezer on 8/27/25, with a 'use by' date of 9/3/25; one opened package of wheat bread, unlabeled and undated; two opened packages of pasta, opened on 9/1/24, with a 'use by' date of 9/1/25. AsstDM stated the items were past their expiration dates and needed to be discarded.-In the walk-in refrigerator: 20 heads of celery with wilted leaves, with an expiration date of 9/4/25. AsstDM confirmed the celery was past the expiration date and should not be served to residents.During an interview on 9/7/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly dispose garbage for a census of 67 residents, when a kitchen garbage dumpster was found to have two gaping, warped lids. This failure had the potential to produce unsanitary conditions for residents due to easy access for rodents and other pests.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/7/25 at 9:46 a.m. with the Registered Dietician (RD) and the Maintenance Plant Director (PD), the kitchen dumpsters were observed. One garbage dumpster's lids were rounded and bowed, leaving a lengthy 3-inch (a unit of measure) gap between the lids and the top rim. RD stated it was a pest problem because rodents and insects had access inside the dumpster. PD stated he ordered a new dumpster but had no documentation of the order with the disposal company.A review of the facility's document titled, Garbage and Trash, dated 2023, indicated, Adequate, clean, vermin-proof areas must be provided for the storage of garbage . and that the lids are closed.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control measures were implemented for a census of 67 residents, when:1.Multiple surfaces in the laundry room's clean area were found with an accumulation of a gray powdery substance;2.Resident 73's nebulizer (machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) mask was found on top of the nightstand without a bag;3.Resident 34's bathroom toilet contained a large, thick soiled dressing;4.Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 and LN 4 did not maintain fingernails in accordance with the facility's policy;5.Multi-resident medical equipment was not sanitized and disinfected in accordance with professional standards; and6.Single use Styrofoam tray used during med pass was not disposed after use.These failures had the potential to spread infection among residents, staff, and visitors.Findings: 1.During an observation on 9/8/25 at 11:06 a.m. in the laundry room's clean area, an accumulation of gray powdery substance was found on a cart containing clean linens covered with pink mesh…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 26 sampled residents (Resident 16 and Resident 11) and their responsible parties (RP- a person responsible for health care decisions) were informed of the residents' change of condition and medical appointments.This failure had the potential for the residents' RP not to be able to make an informed decision about the residents' healthcare.FindingsA review of Resident 16's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). The record also indicated Resident 16's son was the RP.During an interview on 9/8/25 at 12:19 p.m. with Resident 16's RP, RP stated Resident 16 was to be seen by an Ear, Nose and Throat specialist (ENT- a doctor specializing in conditions affecting the ears, nose, throat, sinuses, and parts of the head and neck.) for a follow up about her ear infections and had not been seen.A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain privacy for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 82), when Resident 82's urinary catheter (a tube left in the bladder to continuously drain urine into a collection bag) collection bag had no privacy cover. This failure decreased the facility's potential to maintain Resident 82's dignity.Findings:A review of Resident 82's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with diagnoses including acute cystitis (bladder infection) and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (a condition in which the nerves controlling the bladder and urinary sphincter are damaged, leading to problems with urine storage and emptying).A review of Resident 82's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 9/3/25, indicated her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) was 12 out of 15 with moderate memory impairment.A review of Resident 82's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 5), when the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool) inaccurately indicated Resident 5 had no pressure ulcers (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence).This failure had the potential to incorrectly recognize Resident 5's care needs.Findings:A review of an admission record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with a diagnosis of pressure ulcers. During an observation on 9/7/25 at 9:44 a.m. inside Resident 5's room, a wound vacuum assisted closure device (wound VAC, a negative pressure wound treatment that uses suction to help hard to heal wounds heal faster) was observed at the side of Resident 5's bed in continuous operation.A review of Resident 5's Order Summary Report, dated 7/10/25, indicated Resident 5 had treatment orders for two stage four pressure ulcers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 76), when Resident 76 was not given a shower as scheduled.This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide comfort to residents.Findings:A review of an admission record indicated Resident 76 was admitted to the facility in September 2025 with a diagnosis of right femur (thigh bone) and vertebra (backbone) fracture.During an interview on 9/7/25 at 9:24 a.m. with Resident 76, Resident 76 stated she felt uncomfortable because she had not taken a shower since her admission to the facility.A review of the facility's Skilled Nursing Shower Assignment, updated on 8/18/25, indicated Resident 76 was scheduled to have morning showers on Monday, Wednesday and Friday.During an interview on 9/10/25 at 9:45 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2), CNA 2 stated residents were assisted with showers in the morning per their schedule. CNA 2 further stated CNAs must complete a shower tracking sheet and document it in the computer to let the Licensed Nurse (LN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper care of respiratory equipment was consistent with the facility's policy and professional standards of practice for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 10), when Resident 10's nebulizer tubing and nasal cannula (a thin, flexible tube that goes around your head and into the nose and gives additional oxygen through the nose) were not changed after seven days.This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide safe respiratory care for Resident 10.Findings:A review of an admission record indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with a diagnosis of respiratory failure with hypoxia (insufficient amount of oxygen in the body's tissues).A review of Resident 10's Order Summary Report, dated 7/30/25, indicated an order for oxygen via nasal cannula to keep oxygen saturation at 92 percent.During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/7/25 at 9:32 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) in Resident 10's room, a nebulizer machine with tubing/mouthpiece (a machine that turns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), when the resident was not provided shower for five days. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2 ' s not attaining her feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in spring 2025 with diagnoses which included spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spine), weakness, gait (walking) and mobility (moving) abnormalities, and lower back pain. During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS – a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 6/6/25 , the MDS indicated Resident 2 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), including bathing. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/12/25 at 9:40 a.m. with Resident 2 in Resident 2 ' s room, Resident 2 was awake, alert and verbally responsive, and stated, I voiced my concern about not getting a shower quite a bit to the CNA ' s (Certified Nursing Assistant). My hair was so matted and dirty it didn ' t make me feel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The microwave in the kitchen was not clean; 2. Several various sizes of metal sheet pans were stacked wet stored at the clean and ready-to-use storage areas; 3. Produce items were not fresh and not discarded; and, 4. One dishwasher was not able to verbalize the procedure for the manual dishwashing with 3-compartment sinks correctly. These failures had potential to cause food-borne illness in a highly susceptible population of 59 out of 59 residents who received food from the kitchen. 1.During a concurrent observation and interview with Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 9/23/24 at 8:48 a.m. at the kitchen's initial tour, the microwave was observed to have dry liquid splashes on the interior top of the microwave. The DS confirmed the microwave was dirty and stated the dry food splashes and dry food debris should be cleaned. During a review of a facility document titled, Section 8- Sanitation, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility was unable to provide a clean environment for the residents and visitors when three of three garbage dumpsters, located outside the facility, was not closed securely due to deformed dumpster lids. This failure had the potential for an unsafe environment for the residents and visitors due to possible pest infestation and spread of diseases in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 9/23/24 at 8:38 a.m outside, three out of three dumpsters were covered with bent and deformed lids with bags of trash inside the bins. There were gaps between the deformed lids and the bins because the lids lacked integrity to securely cover the bins. DS confirmed the condition of the dumpster lids and agreed that the facility needed to order new trash bins. The DS further acknowledged that the lids needed to be closed tightly to prevent pest issues. During a review of facility policy and procedure titled, Miscellaneous Areas, last revised 2023, indicated, 1. All food waste must be placed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was being followed for the therapeutic diet (a modification of a regular diet, tailored to fit the nutritional needs of a particular person - may be part of a treatment or medical condition and usually prescribed by a physician) for lunch meals on 9/23/24 and 9/24/24 when: 1. Resident 257 with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) mechanical texture diet (a diet that consist of foods that are moist, mechanically altered, easily mashed) who: a. Received puree zucchini instead of chopped and mashable zucchini on 9/23/24 lunch meal b. Received puree apple bread pudding instead of bread pudding chopped into half inch (1/2) and soak in milk on 9/24/24 lunch meal 2. Resident 21 with CCHO (controlled carbohydrate) diet (a diet to control blood sugar level) received one slice of garlic breadstick instead of one half of garlic breadstick on 9/23/24 lunch meal. 3. Resident 20 with finger food diet (a diet that provides food in appropriate size and shape to be eaten without utensils) who received regular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 42), when the chain that is used to turn on Resident 42's overhead light was broken and unreachable. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 42 not experiencing a homelike environment which can negatively impact his psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 42's admission Record, indicated he was admitted in early September 2024 with diagnoses including depression. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/24/24 at 8:49 a.m., in Resident 42's room, the chain attached to the overhead light to turn it on and off was broken, approximately three inches long. Resident 42 stated the chain had been broken since admission, which prevented him from turning the light on or off and limited him to do simple things on his own. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/25/24 at 9:24 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) in Resident 42's room, LN 1 acknowledged the chain was too short for Resident 42 to reach and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA, an assessment that indicates a major decline or improvement in the resident's status) was completed for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 45), when Resident 45 developed a stage four pressure ulcer (PU, deep wound reaching the muscles, ligaments, and bones) to the left sacrum (triangular bone, back portion of the pelvis). This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide appropriate care and services to Resident 45 based on her status. Findings: A review of Resident 45's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses including morbid obesity and diabetes (chronic disease when the body can't produce insulin to control blood sugar). During an observation on 9/23/24 at 8:50 a.m., Resident 45 was observed with a wound vacuum (a device that uses suction to help wounds heal) attached to her lower back. A review of Resident 45's Change in Condition note, dated 7/5/24, indicated Resident 45 developed a stage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used for care) accurately reflected the status of one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 45), when Resident 45's pressure ulcer (PU, an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue) was not coded accordingly. This failure had the potential for Resident 45 to receive inadequate wound care management. Findings: A review of Resident 45's admission Record, indicated Resident 45 was admitted in August 2024 with diagnoses including morbid obesity and diabetes (chronic disease when the body can not produce insulin to control blood sugar). A review of the facility's census, indicated Resident 45 was sent to the hospital on 8/23/24 for an infection and was readmitted back to the facility on 8/29/24. A review of Resident 45's MDS Discharge Assessment, dated 8/23/24, indicated she had a stage four PU to the left sacrum (triangular bone at the back of pelvis). A review of Resident 45's Skin Observation Sheet, conducted on 8/29/24 upon readmission to the facility, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 208), when Resident 208's care plan did not address the use of a leg immobilizer. This failure had the potential for Resident 208's order to be missed and not implemented. Findings: A review of Resident 208's admission Record, indicated she was admitted in September 2024 with diagnoses including pathological fracture of the right distal femur (lower end of right thigh bone). During an observation on 9/23/24 at 1 p.m., Resident 208 was observed seated in the wheelchair wearing a right leg immobilizer. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/25/24 at 11:30 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), Resident 208's care plan was reviewed. LN 1 stated she could not find a care plan that addressed Resident 208's use of a leg immobilizer. During an interview on 9/25/24 at 2:10 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), DON acknowledged that a care plan was not developed for Resident 208's use of a leg immobilizer. DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide services which meet professional standards of quality for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 208), when Resident 208 was allowed to use a right knee/leg immobilizer without a physician's order. This failure increased Resident 208's potential to use a knee/leg immobilizer without a physician order. Findings: A review of Resident 208's admission Record, indicated she was admitted in September 2024 with diagnoses including pathological fracture of the right distal femur (lower end of right thigh bone). During an observation on 9/23/24 at 1 p.m., Resident 208 was observed seated in the wheelchair wearing a right knee/leg immobilizer. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/23/24 at 4:18 p.m. with Treatment Nurse 1 (TN 1), TN 1 confirmed Resident 208 had been using the right knee/leg immobilizer since her admission. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/25/24 at 11:30 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), Resident 208's Order Summary Report was reviewed. LN 1 stated Resident 208…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an ancillary service was provided to one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 42), when Resident 42 was not assisted to use his hearing aids (HAs) daily as ordered. This failure increased Resident 42's inability to hear clearly and communicate properly. Findings: A review of Resident 42's admission Record, indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses including weakness of upper extremities and cerebral infarction (stroke, blood flow to the brain is blocked). During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/23/24 at 3:12 p.m. with Resident 42, a morning routine instruction was posted near Resident 42's bed which included assisting Resident 42 put on his HAs daily. Resident 42 was observed not wearing his HAs. Resident 42 stated staff did not help him and he was not able to put the HAs on his own due to weakness. A review of Resident 42's Order Summary Report, dated 9/21/24, indicated Resident 42 was to wear HAs in the morning and take them off at night. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. A review of Resident 15's admission Record, indicated Resident 15 was admitted in May 2024 with diagnoses including complete paraplegia (inability to move lower body from waist down), weakness, and presurre ulcer on the sacral region (lower back between hip bones). A review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool), dated 8/30/24, indicated presence of a stage three pressure ulcer on the sacral region. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/24/24 at 11:28 a.m. with LN 3, Resident 15's room was observed. There was no sign on the door indicating EBP. LN 3 checked the personal protective supplies in the lower drawer of Resident 15's dresser as per facility practice and no supplies were available. LN 3 agreed EBP sign and PPE supplies were missing. During an interview on 9/26/24 at 10:30 a.m. with DON, DON stated staff should have placed EBP sign on the door and supplies in bottom drawer of Resident 15's dresser. DON stated missing EBP sign and protective supplies increased the risk of spreading infection to Resident 15, other residents, and staff.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 18). This failure decreased Resident 18's potential to get assistance from staff in a timely manner when needed. Findings: A review of Resident 18's admission Record, indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions) and need for assistance with personal care. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/23/24 at 9:23 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1), Resident 18 was observed sitting in a chair next to her bed. Resident 18's call light was clipped to the head side of mattress in bed and behind Resident 18. CNA 1 confirmed Resident 18's call light was out of reach. CNA 1 stated the call light was supposed to be in front of Resident 18 and within her reach. During an interview on 9/26/24 at 10:40 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated the call light placed out of reach for Resident 18 might have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow the professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when required documentation in the resident's chart was not completed timely. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide complete and accurate nursing care for Resident 1. Findings: According to the Resident 1's face sheet, Resident 1 was admitted in late 2023, with diagnosis that include respiratory failure and coronavirus disease. During a record review on 9/10/24 at 10:36 a.m., progress notes in Resident 1's chart indicated that Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital due to a significant change in condition. Upon further review a COC (change of condition) form, a hospital transfer form and family notification were not found. During an interview on 9/10/24 at 12:44 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN), the LN stated that if a resident had a change of condition, she stated I would inform the doctor and family, fill out a COC form ., and transfer to the hospital form. During a concurrent interview and record review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when an order for a topical (used on the skin) cream used for pain was not entered from the hospital orders into Resident 1's medication orders. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not having access to her topical pain cream. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility late 2023 with diagnoses which included respiratory failure and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's AFTER HOSPITAL CARE, dated 12/13/23, the document indicated, Medication List .MISCELLANEOUS CREAMS TOPI (sic) Apply to the affected area if needed [arthritis pain]. Indications: arthritis pain [brand name of cream, over the counter used for pain]. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report [OSR], dated 12/13/23, the OSR does not have (brand name of cream) listed as an order. During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes [PN], Type: NURSE PROGRESS NOTE, dated 12/17/23 at 6:02 a.m. the PN indicated, Resident c/o [complains of] pain to neck and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-07 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a qualified activities director to direct their activities program for a census of 59. This failure potentially placed the residents at risk for decreased physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During an interview on 2/7/24 at 10:55 a.m., with the Activity Director (AD), the AD stated . started a course in November 2023, but it's a 1-year program . there is no activities director consultant overseeing the program . the administrator oversees the program . During a concurrent record review and interview on 2/7/24 at 11:51 a.m., with the facility Administrator (Admin), a previous Plan of Correction (POC, plan to correct previous deficiency) for intakes(s) CA00870126; CA00870644, regarding allegations of an unqualified AD, were reviewed. The POC, dated 12/18/23, stated Currently we employ a certified activities director for consultation and supervision oversight of the activities director and programs. The Admin stated .the activity director consultant isn't overseeing the program yet and will start…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services according to professional standards of quality for four of seven sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4), when doses of antibiotics (medicine that fights bacterial infection) were missed and/or not administered intravenously (IV; into the vein) on time as indicated in physician's orders. This failure increased the residents' potential to have unmet health needs. Findings: 1. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute cystitis (bladder infection) and urinary tract infection (UTI). A review of a record titled, IV Administration, dated 12/23, indicated one gram (a unit of measure) of ertapenem (an antibiotic) to be administered to Resident 1 one time a day for UTI for five days. A review of Resident 1's Location of Administration Report, dated 1/3/24, indicated the 8 a.m. scheduled dose of ertapenem was administered on 12/30/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0680 — isolatedEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review , the facility failed to provide a qualified activities director for their activities program for a census of 61. This failure potentially placed the residents at risk for decreased physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During an interview on 11/21/23 at 12:56 p.m., with the Activity Director (AD), AD stated . This is my first job as an activities director I don ' t have my state certification . I have not done my training course yet . AD stated that she is aware she needs the state certification and is currently looking into state training courses. During a concurrent record review and interview on 11/21/23 at 2:22 p.m., with the facility Administrator (Admin) and Director of Nursing (DON), the AD 's personnel file was reviewed and no documentation of activity qualifications was seen. Admin stated, I don't know how long she has worked in activities and there is no way for me to check . After reviewing the file the Admin stated . there is no evidence in her file of her experience in activities . During a phone interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, when: 1) One dietary aide did not use appropriate handwashing during food handling; 2) The ice machine was not cleaned and sanitized correctly; 3) Two kitchen staff did not wear hair restraints in the food prep area; 4) Nineteen various size metal pans were found wet or dirty, stacked in the ready to use shelves; 5) Nine dry goods were not sealed or dated in the dry storage area; 6) Eleven cartons of supplement shakes (drinks that provide additional nutrients) were not dated with the correct use by date; and 7) The microwave in the resident's nutrition room was dirty. These failures had the potential to lead to food-borne illnesses. Findings: 1) During the initial kitchen tour on 8/21/23 at 8:52 a.m. Dietary Aide (DA 1) was observed not washing hands in between tasks multiple times when she touched dirty dishes with bare hands, then touched clean dishes, and placed clean gloves on when: a. At 8:52…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and complete a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one out of 19 sampled residents (Resident 19). This failure had the potential for Resident 19 to not receive appropriate care, services, and treatment. Findings: A review of Resident 19's medical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). A review of Resident 19's medical record indicated the following active physician's orders for psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) medications: - Lorazepam (a medication to treat anxiety) 0.5 milligrams (mg, a unit of measure): 1 tablet two times a day, dated 5/26/23; - Lorazepam 1 mg: 1 tablet at bedtime, dated 5/26/23; - Lorazepam 0.5 mg: 1 tablet every 12 hours as needed for breakthrough anxiety/agitation related to bipolar disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure accurate accountability and effective storage of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction) when random controlled medication audits for two out of two residents (Residents 21 and 303) did not reconcile. The medications were signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but were not documented accurately on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate they were given to the residents; 2. Have an efficient system in place to accurately document and secure emergency medications (E-Kit) for a census of 52; 3. Store discontinued controlled medications in accordance with facility policy and procedure (P&P); and, 4. Ensure medications were safely administered to two out of four sampled residents (Residents 3 and 13). These failures resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled medications and potential for abuse or misuse of these medications, the potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 19 sampled residents (Resident 19 and Resident 202) were free of unnecessary medications when: 1. Resident 202 was prescribed three psychotropic (a drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) medications without adequate indication and behavior monitoring, a PRN psychotropic had no end date and consent was not obtained prior to its administration; and 2. Resident 19 was prescribed four psychotropic medications without adequate side effect and behavior monitoring. These failures placed the residents at risk for use of unecessary psychotropic medications. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 202's admission record indicated she was admitted in 8/23 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities) and depression. A review of Resident 202's clinical record included the following documents: A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 32.26% error rate when ten medication errors out of 31 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for three out of four residents (Residents 3, 13 and 47). This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and potential to affect the residents' clinical conditions. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 8/21/23 at 8:33 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), LN 2 was observed preparing three medications, including metoprolol succinate (a medication to treat high blood pressure) ER (ER, a long acting formulation) 50 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement), magnesium oxide (a mineral to treat heartburn) 400 mg, and lisinopril (a medication to treat high blood pressure) 10 mg for Resident 47. LN 2 took Resident 47's blood pressure but did not measure the resident's heart rate. A review of Resident 47's medical record indicated the following physician's orders: - Metoprolol succinate ER 50 mg: 1 tablet one time a day for HTN (hypertension, high blood pressure).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: - Medication carts were kept securely locked when left unattended; - Opened biologicals, multi-dose inhalers, and inhalation solutions were dated with an open and discard date to ensure they were not used beyond the discard date; - Medication was appropriately labeled with a pharmacy label or name to correctly identify which resident they were for; and - Expired and discontinued medications were not available for resident use. The deficient practices had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe or reduced potency from being used past their discard date or improper storage, and diversion or misuse of medications from not being securely stored in medication carts. Findings: During an observation on [DATE] at 8:29 a.m., the medication cart (med cart) was observed unlocked and unattended facing a resident's room. During a second observation on [DATE] at 8:34 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), LN 2 left the med…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for the therapeutic diets (a modification of a regular diet, to fit the residents nutritional needs) during the lunch meal on 8/22/2023 when nine residents (Residents 9, 18,20,23,31,43,203, 205 and 305) did not receive the correct dessert. These failures had the potential to result in compromising the medical and nutritional status of nine residents for a census of 52. Findings: During an observation of lunch meal service on 8/22/23, beginning at 12:15 p.m., it was noted seven residents (Residents 18,20,23,31,43,203, and 205) received fresh fruit as a substitute for the diet apple square for dessert on the menu. Resident 305 received fresh fruit instead of the regular glazed apple square for dessert. Resident 9 received puree regular apple square instead of puree diet apple square. A review of residents' meal tickets on 8/22/23 for lunch indicated eight residents (Residents 9, 18, 20, 23, 31, 43, 203, and 205) were on therapeutic diets of CCHO (controlled carbohydrate diet, a diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. During an observation on 8/21/23 at 8:33 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), LN 2 used a blood pressure cuff to measure Resident 47's blood pressure. After the resident's blood pressure was taken, LN 2 removed the cuff and placed it on the top of the medication cart without sanitizing and disinfecting it. LN 2 was observed taking the blood pressure of Resident 3 and Resident 13 without sanitizing or disinfecting in-between uses. 4. During a medication pass observation on 8/21/23 at 9 a.m. with LN 2, LN 2 was observed administering medications to Resident 13. LN 2 placed Resident 13's medication cup on her bedside table then touched her own hair and glasses. LN 2 left the room to prepare applesauce for Resident 13 and returned to the resident without performing hand hygiene. During an interview on 8/21/23 at 12:09 p.m. with LN 2, LN 2 confirmed she did not sanitize and disinfect the blood pressure cuff that was used earlier on multiple residents. When asked if she performed hand hygiene after touching her hair or glasses in the middle of performing direct resident care she stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reasonably accommodate the needs of two of 19 sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 31) when their call lights were not within reach. This failure had the potential to result in residents being unable to request assistance when needed. Findings: In a concurrent observation and interview, on 8/21/23 at 9:49 a.m., Resident 31 was lying asleep in bed and her call light was on the floor approximately three feet away. Certified Nursing Assistant 4 (CNA 4) confirmed the call light was on the floor and out of Resident 31's reach. In a concurrent observation and interview, on 8/21/23 at 10:20 a.m., Resident 22 was asleep in bed and his call light was not seen. When asked where the resident's call light was, CNA 3 stated she did not know and went to the resident's bedside table where she removed a manilla folder and 2 boxes of tissues and found it coiled beneath them. CNA 3 confirmed the call light was not within Resident 22's reach. In an interview, on 8/24/23 at 11:07 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form for one resident (Resident 29) of 19 sampled residents was valid in the electronic health record (EHR). This failure decreased the staff's potential to safely follow Resident 29's POLST during emergencies. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 29 was initially admitted to the facility in [DATE] and readmitted in [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis (blood infection; a life-threatening medical emergency). A review of Resident 29's POLST, dated [DATE], indicated if Resident 29 had no pulse and was not breathing Do Not Attempt Resuscitation/DNR (Allow Natural Death). A review of Resident 29's Order Summary Report, dated [DATE], indicated to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for Resident 29. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:36 p.m. with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3), LN 3 stated, if a resident had no pulse and was not breathing she would check the EHR's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely submit an MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool) for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 24) when a discharge MDS from 4/23 had not yet been submitted. This failure had the potential to result in incomplete information being submitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). Findings: A review of Resident 24's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility in 3/23 and discharged on 4/6/23. In an interview, on 8/24/23 at 10:58 a.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed Resident 24's discharge MDS had not yet been submitted to CMS and was overdue. In an interview, on 8/24/23 at 11:16 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she expected staff to follow the required timeframes for MDS submission. A review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, revised 7/17, indicated the facility would conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes as published in the Resident Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and complete a baseline care plan (BCP) within 48 hours of admission for one resident (Resident 29) of 19 sampled residents. This failure decreased the facility's potential to communicate the initial plan of care with residents, promote their continuity of care, and increase their safety. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 29 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including sepsis (blood infection; a life-threatening medical emergency). During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/23 at 10:25 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 29's BCPs were reviewed. DON confirmed Resident 29 had no BCP after she was initially admitted on [DATE], and the BCP dated 7/12/23, was incomplete after she was readmitted . DON stated the BCP should have been initiated by the nursing supervisors upon Resident 29's admission, completed by other departments, and closed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans at least quarterly for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 31) when her risk for pressure ulcer and risk for incontinence care plans had not been revised since 4/19/23. This failure had the potential to result in unmet nursing needs for Resident 31. Findings: A review of Resident 31's admission record indicated she was admitted in 1/23 with diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and unspecified urinary incontinence (lack of voluntary control over urination). A review of Resident 31's clinical record included the following documents: A Prevention of Pressure Ulcer Risk Care Plan, initiated 1/19/23, was last revised 4/19/23. A Risk for Incontinence Care Plan, initiated 1/19/23, was last revised 4/19/23. In an interview, on 8/23/23 at 9:30 a.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated resident care plans were updated at least quarterly and confirmed Resident 31's incontinence and risk for pressure ulcer care plans had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide baths/showers as scheduled for two out of 19 sampled residents (Resident 16 and Resident 13) when Resident 16 and Resident 13 did not have a shower as scheduled. These failures had the potential to decrease cleanliness and comfort for the residents. Findings: During a review of the admission Record, Resident 16 was first admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including lower spine fracture and abnormal gait and mobility (the pattern and way a resident walks). A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool) dated 8/23/23, indicated Resident 16 required extensive assistance with bathing. A review of the Census List, Resident 16 was in the facility on 7/6/23 to 8/14/23, and was readmitted on [DATE] to present date. During a review the Shower Schedule, Resident 16 was on a Wednesday and Saturday day-time shower schedule. During an interview on 8/21/23 at 10:03 a.m., Resident 16 stated she would like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor food preferences during the lunch meal on 8/22/23 for two sampled residents (Resident 12 and Resident 8) out of a census of 53 when; 1. Resident 12 was served a whole slice of turkey even though ground meats was documented on Resident 12's meal card; and, 2. Resident 8 was served fresh fruit as a dessert instead of the regular dessert which was documented on Resident 8's meal card. This failure increased the potential for Resident 12 and Resident 8 to have an unpleasant dining experience and had the potential to result in altered nutrition. Findings: A review of Resident 12's admission Record indicated, Resident 12 was admitted in Summer 2023 with multiple diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). An observation of lunch tray line, Resident 12 was served a whole slice of turkey by the dietary aide (DA 1). DA 1 was then observed plating the next resident's tray. A review of Resident 12's meal ticket (a ticket including resident's diet, date, allergies, specific food and beverage items,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document and communicate the necessary information for a hospital transfer for one resident (Resident 29) of 19 sampled residents, when Resident 29's Interact SBAR [Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation] Communication Form was not completed. This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent delayed care for transferred residents. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 29 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], transferred to the hospital on 7/6/23, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis (blood infection; a life-threatening medical emergency), hypotension (low blood pressure), pneumonitis (lung inflammation) due to inhalation of food and vomit, acute kidney failure, and urinary tract infection (UTI). A review of Resident 29's Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool), dated 7/18/23, indicated the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was 10 with some memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a pneumococcal vaccine (a vaccine to prevent infection of one or both lungs) for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 32) when Resident 32 did not receive a pneumococcal vaccine when it was due. This failure had the potential to increase the chance of Resident 32 getting a lung infection. Findings: Review of the admission Record, Resident 32 was over [AGE] years old and admitted to facility on 2/13/23, with diagnoses including pneumonia (infection of the lung) and respiratory failure. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/23/23 at 1:42 p.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) confirmed Resident 32 gotten a previous pneumococcal in 2020 and stated the next dose is due. The IP further stated the family member verbally consented for the vaccination and confirmed there was no documentation requesting an order from the physician. Review of the facility's document titled, Pneumococcal and Annual Vaccine Information and Request, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide education regarding risks and benefits associated with COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease, an infection affecting the lungs) vaccination for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 35) when Resident 35 did not receive the risks and benefits education upon refusal of a COVID-19 vaccination. This failure had the potential to decrease the chance of Resident 35 getting a COVID-19 vaccination. Findings: On review of the admission Record, Resident 35 was admitted to facility on 3/28/23, with diagnoses including COVID-19. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/23/23 at 1:59 p.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) confirmed there was no documentation of education on the risks and benefits of COVID-19 when Resident 35 refused the vaccination. There was no documentation of COVID-19 consent upon request from the IP. Review of the facility's policy titled, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents, dated 11/2021, indicated, .The resident is provided with education regarding the benefits, risks, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$14,886 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $7,443 — penalty dated 2023-08-25
- $7,443 — penalty dated 2023-08-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CYPRESS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| JACKSON, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2023 |
| JACKSON, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2023 |
| SANOFSKY, JACK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2023 |
| CARDELLA, MELISSIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/28/2023 |
| CARINO, ROSEMARIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2023 |
| CRANE, MARTHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/05/2024 |
| CRAWFORD, KEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/09/2023 |
| GOLSHAN, NEGAR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/08/2024 |
| HAWKINS, DOUG | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2023 |
| MALA, SANDHYA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/24/2023 |
| PURDUE, SHERYCE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/11/2024 |
| SMITH, GREGORY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $889K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555180. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.