No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pioneer House

415 P Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (916) 442-4906 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
609 L St · (916) 326-8200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
523 Broadway · (916) 442-9009 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
555 Capitol Mall
Park
800 N St · (916) 324-0575 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.4%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.3%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.0%9.8%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.9%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.8%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.8%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission0.0%23.0%22.6%check this — see note marked star below the table
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.8%11.2%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.6%CMS range 26.5–54.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.3–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.3–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.93
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
44.8%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 46.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision when they did not ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was wearing a wandering device (a wearable device, commonly referred to as a wander guard, with sensors that trigger alarms, used to prevent residents at risk of wandering from leaving a safe area unsupervised) according to Resident 1's physician orders (PO) and care plan (CP).This failure resulted in Resident 1 walking out of the facility unsupervised and without the facility's knowledge, which exposed the resident to cold temperatures, nightfall, and traffic, which could have resulted in serious injury, medical complications, and/or death. Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in September 2025 with multiple medical diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), a history of falling, and a spinal fracture. Resident 1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement ordered measures to promote wound healing for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when staff did not ensure that low air loss (LAL) mattress (a specialized medical-grade support surface used to prevent and treat bedsores [pressure ulcers] by combining continuous airflow with pressure relief) air pump for Resident 1 was working or connected to the power outlet. This failure increased the potential for slower healing or worsening pressure ulcer in Resident 1.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 6/3/26 (print date), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in March of 2026 with diagnoses which included a need for assistance with personal care, and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells). During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan Report (CPR), dated 6/3/26 (print date), the CPR indicated, [Resident 1] is at risk for worsening skin breakdown/pressure injuries.Utilize pressure-relieving mattress and other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement measures to prevent an avoidable elopement for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when staff was unaware Resident 1 had left the facility unsupervised. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's health and safety and could result to harm and injury. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior). A review of Resident 1's Wandering Risk Assessment, dated [DATE], indicated Resident was high risk for elopement. A review of Resident 1's physician orders and notice of admission form, both dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand choices and make decisions. A review of Resident 1's Care Plan Report (CPR), initiated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 was non-compliant to facility's wander management system (WMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for one of 3 Residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 who was homeless was discharged without proper arrangements for home health nursing services to manage multiple burn wounds, food, or transportation to follow up medical appointments. A review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 in the fall of 2025 with multiple diagnoses which included aftercare for multiple burn wounds that had been surgically grafted (a procedure where healthy skin is taken from one part of the body and transplanted to cover another area where skin is damaged). Resident 1's medical history indicated Resident 1 had third degree burns over 20-29% of her body surface area, muscle wasting and atrophy, gait and mobility disorders, and a carrier of Methicillin Resistant Staph Aureus (MRSA- a type of bacteria that becomes resistant to common antibiotics).A review of a document titled Order Summary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for three of 13 sampled residents (Resident 20, Resident 36 and Resident 2) when:Resident 20's medical record was not updated with the correct diagnosis;Resident 20's physician's order to wear a cervical collar was not followed;Resident 36's physician's order for weight monitoring was not followed; andResident 2's physician's order for daily weights was not followed.These failures resulted in an inaccurate medical record for Resident 20, Resident 36 and Resident 2 and had the potential for injury to Resident 20's neck. Findings: 1.Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in Fall of 2025 with diagnoses which included injury of the spinal cord in the neck area, fracture of the neck and lower back spine. A review of the Resident 20 Physician's Progress note (PN) dated 10/30/25 indicated, Late Entry: Psych Evaluation.medical history of significant.anxiety, depression, schizophrenia (a serious mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with activities of daily living (ADL, basic self-care tasks) to maintain personal hygiene for two of 13 sampled residents (Resident 33 and Resident 23) when nail care was not performed.These failures increased the risk of infection and had the potential to diminish the residents' sense of dignity. 1.Resident 33 was admitted to the facility mid-2023 with diagnosis which included stroke with loss of movement to one side of the body, and high blood sugar. During a review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS, federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/29/25, the MDS indicated resident 33 could not perform personal hygiene (wash/dry face and hands) without full assistance from a staff member. During an observation and interview on 12/1/25 at 9:28 a.m. with Resident 33 in her room, Resident 33's right hand fingernails were long with thick dried dark matter underneath each nail, there was dried dark matter around the cuticles. Resident 33 stated it would be nice if her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 4) were offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration.This failure placed Resident 4 at risk for dehydration.Findings:Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in September of 2025 with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (a nervous system disease that affects the brain and spinal cord). A review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 11/5/25, indicated Resident 4 required set-up assistance to drink fluids. A review of Resident 4's Care Plan (CP), revised 11/13/25, indicated, Ms. [Resident 4] is at risk for fluid volume deficit (Dehydration) R/T [related to] impaired mobility.offer fluids as tolerated or as indicated by diet order.A review of Resident 4's fluid intake sheet indicated Resident 4 had 240 milliliters (ml, 240ml of fluid is equal to one cup) on 12/3/25 and 240ml on 12/1/25.During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/1/25 at 1 p.m., Resident 4 was observed lying in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage for a census of 49 when expired medications were available for residents use and medications were not stored properly.These failures had the potential for residents to receive ineffective medications and placed residents at risk for cross contamination. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 10:33 a.m. of the medication cart with Licensed Nurse (LN 2), a nasal spray and eye drops stored next to oral medications were observed. LN 2 confirmed the findings and stated the nasal sprays and eye drops should not be mixed with oral medications. Also, a clear plastic bag labeled only with a resident's first name contained an oral inhaler and a nasal spray was observed. LN 2 confirmed the findings and stated the inhaler, and nasal spray should not be stored together due to cross contamination.During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 11:30 a.m. of the medication supply closet with LN 2 multiple vitamins and anti-diarrhea medications were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and stored in a safe and sanitary manner for a census of 48 residents who received food prepared from the kitchen, when:1. Trash can by the hand washing station was found without plastic liner with used gloves, paper towels and coffee creamer cups;2. Food debris was found on several kitchen utensils inside the plastic tray, while the bottom of the tray designated for storing clean kitchen utensils contained visible dirt and food debris;3. Several plastic water pitchers and metal pans were found stacked wet and stored at the clean and ready-to-use storage areas;4. Water collected in the plastic pan under refrigerator one's evaporator located on the top of the metal shelf used to store resident foods;5. Liquid was observed leaking from the bowl onto the base and surrounding countertop during food processor operations. Staff used a wiping cloth taken from another countertop to clean the liquid from the bowl, base, drive shaft, and counter. The same cloth was reused to wipe these areas on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices for two of 13 sampled residents (Resident 19 and Resident 23) when:1. Resident 23's tube feeding syringe (a large syringe used to administer nutrition through a tube placed in the stomach) was not labeled with a date, and2. Staff did not put on a gown while providing care to Resident 19 and Resident 23 who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, precautions taken to prevent the spread of disease and require the use of a gown and gloves).These failures had the potential to increase the spread of infection. Findings:1. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in May of 2025 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain) affecting left dominant side and dysphagia (trouble swallowing). During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 1:06 p.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), LN 2 was administering a tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program to prevent cockroach infestation in the kitchen, dining hall, and surrounding areas when multiple cockroaches were observed in these locations.This failure posed a potential health risk to the 49 residents due to exposure to pests. Findings:During an interview with Resident 62 on 12/1/25 at 12:19 p.m., Resident 62 indicated that she woke up one night to find a cockroach on her body and after turning on the lights, she observed a large cockroach on the bathroom wall stating, We turned on the lights, and it was a big cockroach!During an interview with Resident 28 on 12/1/25 at 12:23 p.m., Resident 28 stated that she observed cockroaches crawling on the walls in the dining hall.During an interview with the Dietary Aide (DA 2) in the Kitchen on 12/1/25 at 2:35 p.m., DA 2 stated that the facility underwent a major pest control spray last month and that pest control services had been since visiting weekly to perform additional spraying in the kitchen. DA 2 further stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate reconciliation of controlled medications for two of 13 sampled residents (Resident 56 and Resident 57) when random controlled medication audits did not reconcile.These failures resulted in the facility not having an accurate accountability of controlled substances and increased the potential for diversion. The controlled medication record for two random residents (Resident 56 and Resident 57) who received as needed controlled medications were requested for review during the survey.During a review of Resident 57's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 11/1-12/31/25, Resident 57 had orders for Hydromorphone (opioid analgesic) 4 mg to be given every two hours as needed for pain.During a review of Resident 57's CONTROLLED DRUG RECORD [CDR], [a form that keeps count of the number of narcotics dispensed to a resident], entries dated from 11/30/25-12/2/25, the CDR indicated one tablet of Hydromorphone 4 mg was removed from the medication card (pre-packaged medications dispensed from a pharmacy) on 11/30/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the rights to be free from physical abuse for two of four sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3), when: 1. Resident 1 entered Resident 2's room, touched Resident 2's belongings, ate his food, and swung her arms at Resident 2 when Resident 2 tried to intervene; and2. Resident 1 approached Resident 3 in the dining room and hit her on the back. These failures resulted in Resident 2 and Resident 3 sustaining pain and injury from physical contact and voicing their safety concerns.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 9/5/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in mid-2025 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and dementia with behavioral disturbance (a condition where cognitive decline is accompanied by significant behavioral changes). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure one out of two sampled residents, Resident 1, was provided a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience malnutrition and weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicate Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR, physician orders) indicated an order for a regular diet, soft and bite sized texture (foods that are soft, and chopped into bite-sized pieces) with a start date of 2/7/25. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/25 at 12:05 p.m. in Resident 1's room, with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1, Resident 1's lunch and lunch tray card were observed. Resident 1's tray card indicated mince moist (foods that are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe discharge for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was discharged to a room and board facility (a home that offers housing accommodations, may offer meals, but does not provide personal care services) and did not have care needed for activities of daily living (ADL). This failure resulted in Resident 1 living in an unsafe environment that could not meet Resident 1's needs which prompted a transfer to the hospital. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke- disrupted blood flow to the brain causing brain tissue death), right leg above the knee amputation, bipolar disorder (mental health condition causing extreme mood swings that include emotional highs and lows) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to make sure that an inventory of personal belongings sheet was completed, and a copy was given upon admission to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1.) This failure had the potential for the resident ' s personal belongings being lost or stolen. Findings: During a review or Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted in late 2024 with diagnoses which included anxiety. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Inventory of Personal Effects (IPE – inventory sheet), dated 12/2/24, the IPE did not have the Resident 1 ' s signature on the ' Certification of Receipt ' portion of the document. During a review of Resident 1 ' s closed record, there was no documented evidence that Resident 1 signed the inventory sheet and was given a copy upon admission on the nurse ' s notes or admission record. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS – a federally mandated resident assessment tool) Section C, dated 12/5/24, the MDS indicated, Resident 1 was cognitively intact. During a telephone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect two sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 2) from abuse, when, Resident 3 was verbally threatened and punched by Resident 1 in the face and neck and Resident 2 experienced multiple episodes of sexual inappropriateness from Resident 1, who had a known history of verbal aggression and sexual inappropriateness. These failures resulted in Resident 3's physical injury and emotional distress and feeling dirty for Resident 2. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation Program, revised 4/2021, indicated, Residents have the right to be free from abuse .This includes . freedom from . verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse. According to the admission record, the facility admitted Resident 1 in the fall of 2024 with diagnoses which included multiple fractures of left leg. A review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed follow physician orders for one resident out of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 ' s weight was not measured at admission. This failure had the potential for facility to be unable to recognize if Resident 1 experienced unexpected weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission records indicate Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and severe protein-calorie malnutrition (critical deficiency in protein and calories in the diet). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Order Summary Report (OSR, physician orders), dated 10/31/24, an order for admission weight was noted. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/26/24 at 4:03 p.m., with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Nurse Consultant (NC), the following documents were reviewed: 1. Resident 1 ' s OSR, 2. Progress Notes, dated 10/31/24 – 11/17/24 and, 3. Weights and Vitals Summary, dated 10/31/24 – 11/13/24. The ADON,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure one resident out of five sampled residents (Resident 1), who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene, when Resident 1 did not receive showers as scheduled. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience a decrease in hygiene and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission records indicate Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (blood flow to the brain is blocked, causing brain cells to die) and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 1 ' s Order Summary Report (OSR, physician orders), dated 10/31/24, indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make his own health care decisions. During a review of Resident 1 ' s 48 Hour Baseline Care Plan, (a document that provides person centered instructions for a resident's care), dated 10/31/24, indicated Resident 1 was dependent on staff for grooming and hygiene care, needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in their original containers and in a safe manner for 16 sampled residents. This failure had the potential for medications to be incorrectly identified and misused. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/14/24 at 9:01 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 3, at Medication Cart 1 (Med Cart 1). LN 3 opened the top drawer to Med Cart 1 where there were three 30 mL (milliliters, a unit of measurement) plastic cups observed, stacked on top of one another, in the top drawer. Each plastic cup had two or more items in it, unlabeled and unidentified. LN 3 confirmed the plastic cups were not labeled and included the following: 1. One plastic cup had one pink pill and one red liquid-gel pill, 2. One plastic cup had two orange-colored pills, 3. One plastic cup had seven red and white liquid-gel pills. LN 3 acknowledged the medications should not be removed from their original packaging; this is a safety concern. During an interview on 11/15/24 at 10:42 a.m. with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and stored in a safe and sanitary manner for a census of 42 residents who received food prepared from the kitchen, when: 1. Expired half-gallon of milk, opened salad dressing and creamer containers without open dates labeled, and full egg crates without received or expiration dates labeled were found in the kitchen refrigerators; 2. No temperature monitoring logs for resident food freezer section and for the dry storage room; 3. Ice and water dispensers in the dining room were not clean; and, 4. Lids used for covering prepared food on the steam table were stored on top of the unclean oven top. These failures decreased the facility's potential to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/12/24 commencing at 8:39 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM) the initial tour of the kitchen was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when: 1. Housekeeping staff dipped contaminated gloves into mop bucket sanitizing solution; 2. Laundry room did not contain a hand washing station, and laundry room staff did not use gown for handling dirty laundry, did not sanitize equipment after handling dirty laundry, did not perform hand hygiene after glove removal, did not perform hand hygiene between resident room visits, and hung contaminated clothes hangers back on the clean linens cart; 3. Facility unable to provide evidence of timely corrective action following positive legionella tests in the water systems; 4. Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) did not perform hand hygiene when going in and out of residents' rooms while passing lunch trays; 5. Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) and CNA 3 did not perform hand hygiene when going in and out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 21), maintained their right to retain and use personal possessions when staff were aware Resident 21's cell phone was taken without his permission. This failure resulted in the unrecovered loss of Resident 21's personal cell phone. Findings: A review of Resident 21's admission record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses including intracerebral hemorrhage (an emergency condition in which a ruptured blood vessel causes bleeding inside the brain) and hemiplegia (complete paralysis) and hemiparesis (partial paralysis) to the left dominant side. During an interview on 11/13/24 at 10:23 a.m., in Resident 21's room, Resident 21 stated, They took my cellphone away a few months ago because I called 911 a couple of times because the nurse at night wouldn't come help me when I was in pain. When questioned where the cell phone was currently, Resident 21 stated, I don't know. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/14/24 at 12:25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to investigate and report an allegation of abuse for one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 21), when Resident 21 notified a Licensed Nurse (LN) of an allegation of sexual and physical abuse, which included an injury of unknown origin. This failure caused Resident 21 to feel unsafe within the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 21's admission record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses including intracerebral hemorrhage (an emergency condition in which a ruptured blood vessel causes bleeding inside the brain) and hemiplegia (complete paralysis) and hemiparesis (partial paralysis) to the left dominant side. During an interview on 11/13/24 at 10:38 a.m. in Resident 21's room, when asked if Resident 21 had concerns with the way the facility addresses his mood, behaviors, and care planning, Resident 21 stated, I keep telling them [I need help], I'm scared I'm going to die here .the staff don't care about me, they're going to let me die here .the [Social Services Director (SSD)]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 21), was provided with an environment that supported Resident 21's quality of life when Resident 21 received meals in polystyrene containers with plastic utensils. This failure resulted in Resident 21's lack of self-worth, self-esteem, and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 21's admission record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses including intracerebral hemorrhage (an emergency condition in which a ruptured blood vessel causes bleeding inside the brain) and hemiplegia (complete paralysis) and hemiparesis (partial paralysis) to the left dominant side. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/14/24 at 12:07 p.m., in Resident 21's room, Resident 21's lunch meal was served in a polystyrene container with plastic utensils. Resident 21 stated, I don't know why [meals are served in polystyrene with plastic utensils], they never told me, but I don't like it. They [staff] don't care about me; I'm going to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility corridors had firmly secured handrails for the two out of two facility corridors (Unit A and Unit B corridors). This failure had the potential to result in increased falls and potential for injury to the residents that used the corridors. Findings: A review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated Resident 2 was admitted April of 2024 and had diagnoses that included difficulty in walking. A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to guide care) Cognitive Patterns, dated 4/11/24, indicated Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition) score of 7 out of 15 which indicated Resident 2 had severely impaired cognition. During an observation on 7/18/24 at 12:56 p.m. of the Unit A corridor, Resident 2 was observed walking back and forth using a walker. There were no secured handrails on either side of the corridor walls. During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 44 sampled residents' (Resident 2 and Resident 4), call lights were within reach and easily accessible. This failure placed Resident 2 and Resident 4 at risk of not being able to ask staff for assistance. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in late 2023 with diagnoses which included dementia (loss of memory), history of falling and glaucoma (vision loss). Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in early 2024, with diagnoses which included dementia (loss of memory), chronic kidney disease, stage 3 (kidney damage) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During an observation on 4/2/24 at 2 p.m. in Resident 2's and Resident 4's room, the call lights were observed to be bundled up and placed in a black basket above the bedside dresser. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/2/24 at 2:30 p.m. with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 1, in Resident 2's and Resident 4's room, CNA 1 confirmed the call lights were in the basket out of reach of the Residents and stated, We usually put the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was kept free from sexual abuse when a resident (Resident 4) was found in Resident 1's room touching her genital area (private parts). This failure violated Resident 1's right to be free from sexual abuse and had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted in the winter of 2023 with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection and severe morbid obesity (more than 100 pounds over ideal weight). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 12/27/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact (has sufficient judgment). Resident 4 was admitted in the winter of 2024 with diagnoses that included cellulitis (infection of the skin) of left lower limb (foot), and cerebral infarction (stroke, a lack of adequate blood flow to the brain). During a review of Resident 4's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), in a census of 43, was free from abuse when Resident 2 punched him in the face. This failure caused Resident 1 to sustain a nosebleed. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in the winter of 2023 with multiple diagnoses which included dementia (impaired memory) and schizophrenia (a mental illness characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional responsiveness, and social interactions). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 12/22/23, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had severe memory impairment and needed assistance with his activities of daily living During a review of Resident 1's admission - Nursing Assessment [NA], dated 12/22/23, the NA indicated Resident was admitted to the facility .started screaming at staff during assessment, telling staff to get out of his room . The NA had no facial injuries documented.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record the review, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for 2 of 5 (Resident 2, Resident 3) sampled residents when: 1. Resident 1 threw a container of water at Resident 2, hit Resident 2 on the shoulder, and pushed a wheelchair into Resident 2's bed while Resident 2 was in bed; 2. Resident 1 pushed a wheelchair into Resident 3. This failure resulted in physical injury to Resident 1 and Resident 3 and emotional distress to Resident 2. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility July 2023 with multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia (disorder characterized by thoughts or experiences out of touch with reality and affects ability to think and behave clearly) and Lewy body dementia (brain disorder that leads to problems with thinking and behavior). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 8/23/23, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the Department a physical altercation between two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) that caused physical injury to both residents, within the regulatory time frame. This failure had the potential to cause harm to other residents without proper reporting. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility July 2023 with multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia (disorder characterized by thoughts or experiences out of touch with reality and affects ability to think and behave clearly) and Lewy body dementia (brain disorder that leads to problems with thinking and behavior). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 8/23/23, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 7 out of 15 that indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. A review of Resident 1's Nurse Progress Note, dated 10/29/23 at 2:07 a.m., indicated .[Resident 1] came out to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Social Services (SS) follow up for three days following abuse allegations for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3). This failure had the potential for Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3 to not receive competent and sufficient psychosocial support. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility July 2023 with multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia (disorder characterized by thoughts or experiences out of touch with reality and affects ability to think and behave clearly) and Lewy body dementia (brain disorder that leads to problems with thinking and behavior). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 8/23/23, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 7 out of 15 that indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. A review of Resident 1's Nurse Progress Note, dated 10/21/23, indicated .Resident to resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one dietary personnel was competent to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service when the Dietary Aide (DA) 1 was unable to practice correct hand hygiene practices during dishwashing with the dish machine performed by one person and unable to verbalize the process of manual (3-compartment sink) dishwashing (cross refer to F812, finding number 5). These failures had the potential to cause food borne illness in a potentially compromised population of 42 out of 44 residents who received food from the facility kitchen. Findings: During an initial kitchen tour on 10/9/23, a few observations conducted at 9:47 a.m., 9:51 a.m., and 9:56 a.m., observed the Dietary Aide (DA) 1 washing dishes with dish machine alone by himself. The DA 1 used his same bared hands touching the dirty dishes from the dirty side of dish machine, and then touching the clean dishes from the clean side without any handwashing in between. During a follow-up observation on 10/9/23, at 10:15 a.m., the DA 1 touched the dirty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, served, or distributed in accordance with professional standards of food serve safety when: 1. food items with missing or incorrect labeling and dating were found, 2. food items with opened packages were found not covered to prevent cross contamination (the unintentional transfer of bacteria and/or substances from one food to another), 3. food items that were expired were found and available for use, 4. ice machine was not clean located in the dining room, 5. Dietary Aide (DA) 1 was not able to verbalize the process of manual (3-compartment sink) dishwashing, and not practicing handwashing during dishwashing when perform by one person, 6. The food storage racks were not well maintained, and the condenser unit (a unit converts the refrigerant gas back into a liquid) with dripping water on the food in the walk-in refrigerator, 7. Juice dispenser machine was not clean, 8. Staff personal belongings were found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean environment for the residents and visitors when one garbage dumpster and one food waste bin, located outside the facility, were not secure with the dumpster lids closed. This failure had the potential for an unsafe environment for the residents and visitors due to possible pest infestation and spread of diseases in the facility. Findings: During the kitchen initial tour observation on 10/9/23, at 11:14 a.m., one dumpster garbage bin and one food waste bin located outside nearby facility kitchen were not securely closed by the lids, and there were bags of trash inside both of bins. A concurrent interview with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), and she confirmed and stated both bins should have the lids completely close to prevent pest and rodents. During an interview with the Registered Dietitian (RD) on 10/11/23, at 3:11 p.m., the RD stated the trash bin and food waste bin should be covered with the lids closely to prevent the pest, rodents, and odor. A review of facility policy and procedure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the rights for dignity, privacy and homelike environment were promoted for six of 21 sampled residents (Resident 35, Resident 10, Resident 43, Resident 29, Resident 32, and Resident 146) to maintain and enhance the residents' self-esteem and self-worth and incorporate the residents' preferences, and choices, when: 1. Resident 35's finger nails were long with brownish discoloration under the nails with flaking nail polish; 2. The urinary catheter bag was not covered for Resident 10; 3. Window blind sheet was missing in the room of Resident 29; 4. Several items including loose pieces of metal panels, metal boxes and three large framed paintings, and a meal tray not picked up for two days, were found in Resident 32's room; 5. There was no wall clock or television for Resident 10 and Resident 43; and 6. A non-working wall clock was found in Resident 146's room. These failures had the potential to result in negatively impacting the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences for four of 21 sampled residents (Resident 446, Resident 29, Resident 10, and Resident 43) when: 1. Water was not within reach for Resident 446; 2. Diet request for double protein portions was not provided to Resident 29; 3. The call light device was broken and not working in Resident 10 and Resident 43's room; and 4. There was no wall clock or television in Resident 10 and Resident 43's room. These failures had the potential to result in the residents' not attaining their needs and not maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 446 was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2023 with multiple diagnoses which included aphasia (inability to speak), dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and pneumonitis (inflammation of the lungs). During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for three out of 21 sampled residents (Resident 300, Resident 1, and Resident 32), when: 1. No care plan developed or implemented on medication for Resident 300's skin rash; 2. No care plan developed or implemented after teeth extraction for Resident 1; and 3. No care plan was developed or implemented for Resident 32's psychotropic medication. These failures had the potential to result in residents not attaining their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being.Findings: 1. Resident 300 was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2023 with diagnoses which included brain tumor, difficulty swallowing. During a review of Resident 300's Order Summary Report, (OSR), order start date 9/19/23, the OSR indicated, Triamcinolone Acetonide Cream 0.1% [medication used to treat skin conditions] Apply .every 12 hours as needed for rash . During a review of Resident 300's Nursing Care Plan, (NCP),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders in accordance with the professional standards of quality care for two of 21 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 13), when: 1. Resident 1 was not weighed daily; and 2. Out of range blood sugar levels were not reported to the physician for Resident 13. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not obtaining their highest practicable well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted in the middle of 2017 with diagnoses which included difficulty in walking, edema (swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 8/29/23, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had no memory impairment. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 10/9/23, the OSR indicated a physician's order for daily weights. During a review of Resident 1's Weight Summary History, the summary indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure accurate accountability and effective storage of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction) when random controlled medication audits of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Controlled Drug Record (CDR) for two out of three residents (Residents 2 and 31) did not reconcile to indicate they were given to the residents. 2. Implement a system to accurately document and secure emergency medications (E-Kit) for a census of 44. These failures resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled medications and potential for abuse or misuse of these medications, the potential for emergency medications to be unavailable when needed, and the potential for not meeting the residents' therapeutic needs or worsening of their medical conditions. Findings: 1. Resident 31 had a physician's order, dated 10/5/23, for hydromorphone (a medication to treat pain) 2 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement), one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 10.53% error rate when four medication errors out of 38 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for two of six residents (Residents 31 and 299). This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and potential to affect the residents' clinical conditions. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 10/9/23 at 8:21 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), LN 1 was observed preparing five medications for Resident 31 including one tablet docusate sodium (medication to treat constipation) 100 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement), one capsule fluoxetine (medication to treat depression) 40 mg, one capsule gabapentin (medication to treat pain) 300 mg, two tablets allopurinol (medication used to treat gout, a form of inflammation in the joints) 100 mg, and miralax (medication used to treat constipation) 17 grams (g, a unit of measurement). A review of Resident 31's medical record indicated physician's orders for aspirin (medication used to prevent blood clots) enteric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Prepared medications were properly stored and labeled, and administered at the time of preparation; 2. Controlled medications were stored in accordance with facility policy and procedure; 3. Expired and discontinued medications were not available for resident use; and 4. Opened biologicals, eye drops, and inhalation solutions were dated once opened, to ensure they were not used beyond the discard date, and appropriately labeled with a pharmacy label or name to correctly identify which resident they were for. The deficient practices had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe or reduced potency from being used past their expiration date or improper storage, and diversion or misuse of medications from not being securely stored. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation on 10/9/23 at 9:07 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), two unlabeled medication cups containing white powder were observed on Resident 299's bedside. One of the medication cups indicated groin.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for the therapeutic diet (a modification of a regular diet, tailored to fit the nutritional needs of a particular person. It could be part of a treatment or medical condition and is normally prescribed by a physician) during the lunch meals on 10/10/23 and 10/11/23 when: 1. Five residents (Resident 1, 6, 9, 14, and 19) with small portion diets who got the incorrect portion size with their meals, 2. Eight residents (Resident 1, 10,14, 21,23,28,31, and 32) with mechanical altered texture diets (a modified texture diet is soft and moist for people who has chewing or swallowing issues), and seven residents (Resident 4, 8, 15, 17, 19, 97, and 446) with puree texture diets (a modified texture diet in a consistency of pudding-like for people who has chewing and/or swallowing difficulties), who received ambrosia (a creamy fruit salad usually with pineapple, mandarin oranges, coconut and marshmallows) instead of mandarin orange as dessert, 3. [NAME] (CK) 1 prepared pureed meat and pureed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. During a medication administration observation by the Health Facility Evaluator Nurse (HFEN) and the Pharmacy Consultant (PC) on 10/9/23 at 8:21 a.m. with LN 1, LN 1 prepared medications for Resident 299 which included megestrol (medication used to treat loss of appetite and weight loss) 40 milligrams/milliliter (mg/mL, unit of measurement), 10 milliliter (mL, unit of measurement). During preparation, LN 1 drew 10 mL from the bottle with a syringe. After measuring the medication, LN 1 placed the syringe directly on the medication cart. LN 1 then entered Resident 299's room and administered the medication directly into the resident's mouth with the syringe. During an interview on 10/10/23 at 9:53 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON indicated staff were expected to not place a syringe used to measure medication directly on top of the medication cart. The DON stated, The syringe should have only been used to measure the medication, which should have been poured into a medication cup for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an informed consent was obtained when the dose of quetiapine (a medication used to balance hormones that help regulate mood, behaviors, and thoughts) was increased for one of 44 residents (Resident 32). This failure increased the potential for Resident 32's Responsible Party (RP) to not be informed of the risks and benefits of the medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's clinical record, the record indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included depression, schizophrenia (a mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally), and dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities). During a review of Resident 32's clinical record, the record indicated that Resident 32 was discharged from the hospital and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 32's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], the summary indicated Resident 32…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 21 sampled resident's (Resident 300) responsible party (RP, person in charge of making decisions) was notified of change in services. This failure had the potential to not allow the responsible party (RP) to appeal the decision in a timely manner. Findings: Resident 300 was admitted to the facility fall of 2023 with diagnoses of brain tumor and difficulty swallowing. Family Member 1 (FM 1) was listed as the RP. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/11/23 at 10:47 a.m., with Resident 300, Resident 300 was observed lying in bed, wearing only an adult incontinence brief. Resident 300 was asked if he does any exercises, he stated, No. During an interview on 10/11/23 at 10:48 a.m., with the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR), the DOR was asked if Resident 300 was receiving physical therapy. The DOR stated, No, he is not on services [physical or occupational therapy]. His last covered day [last day he received therapy] was 10/8. During an interview on 10/11/23 at 10:57 a.m., with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a transfer notice for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 26) was sent to the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (resident advocate) as required when Resident 26 was transferred to the hospital. This failure had the potential to deny Resident 26 access to an advocate who could inform residents of their options and rights. Findings: Resident 26 was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2023 with diagnoses which included sepsis (life-threatening complication of an infection). During a review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), the MDS indicated Resident 26 discharged from the facility on 9/3/23. During a review of Resident 26's Nursing Progress Notes (NPN), dated 9/3/23, the NPN indicated, The staff nurse called 911 .The resident left the building at 1900 [7 p.m.] via gurney . During an interview on 10/12/23 at 11:23 a.m., with the Medical Records Director (MRD), the MRD was asked to provide a copy of the Notice of Transfer (document which indicated the resident left the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was performed in accordance with regulatory time frames for three of 21 sampled residents (Resident 29, Resident 146 and Resident 300), when the admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool) assessments were not completed. This failure had the potential to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 29 was admitted in late 2023 with diagnoses which included altered mental status, weakness, repeated falls, depression, and diabetes (abnormal blood sugar levels). During a review of Resident 29's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated the assessment was incomplete, still in progress, and overdue. During a review of Resident 29's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 8/11/23 and revised 10/6/23, the NCP indicated, [Resident 29] at risk for altered nutritional status R/T [related to] .feeling hungry between meals, requesting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was performed in accordance with regulatory time frames for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 10), when the significant change of condition MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool) assessment was not completed. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 10 not attaining the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 10 was admitted in late 2023 with diagnoses which included memory impairment, prostate cancer, repeated falls, difficulty walking and low back pain. During a review of Resident 10's Nursing Progress Notes (NPN) dated 9/8/23, the NPN indicated, [Resident 10] was running fever of 103.6 .positive for UTI [urinary tract infection] .MD notified with orders to send to hospital. During a review of Resident 10's significant change of condition MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated still in progress, incomplete and 18 days overdue. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan (BCP, document that outlines care needs) for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 300) within 48 hours of the resident's admission. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for unmet care needs. Findings: Resident 300 admitted to the facility in the fall of 2023 with diagnoses which included brain tumor and difficulty swallowing. Family Member 1 (FM 1) was listed as the responsible party. During a review of Resident 300's 48 HOUR BASELINE CARE PLAN, the BCP indicated, admission: [DATE]. The BCP was not completed. The notification of completion, and date reviewed with Responsible Party (person responsible for resident) were blank. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/11/23 at 2:45 p.m., with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator, the MDSC stated, .The time frame to complete the BCP should be within 48 hours .for sure on [Resident 300] it looks like his baseline care plan was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 13), when the care plan did not reflect the removal of the urinary catheter (a tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 13's receiving outdated care and placing the resident at risk for not meeting her highest practicable well-being. Findings: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses which included retention of urine (difficulty emptying the bladder of urine) and urinary tract infection (UTI, infection of the bladder). During a review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 9/29/23, the MDS indicated Resident 13 had no memory impairment. During a review of Resident 13's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 9/22/23, the OSR order indicated an antibiotic (a medication to treat infection) to be given with an end date of 9/27/23, and another order to remove Resident 13's urinary catheter. During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure orders were followed for three of 21 sampled residents (Resident 15, Resident 298, and Resident 300) when thin liquids were served instead of thickened liquids (beverage that is specifically designed for people who have difficulty swallowing; helps prevent choking by moving slower than thin liquids). These failures had the potential to increase the risk of choking. Findings: Resident 15 admitted to the facility late 2022 with diagnoses that included lung cancer, stroke and weakness. During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 3/26/23, the MDS indicated Resident 15 had a mechanically altered diet (diet that required a change in texture or liquids). During a review of Resident 15's Order Summary Report (OSR), order date 6/26/23, the OSR indicated, .Puree textures [food that is ground into smooth pudding texture], Nectar Thick Consistency [liquid comparable to heavy syrup consistency]. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly apply bed rails for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 300), when Resident 300 did not have a side rail assessment, risk for entrapment assessment or informed consent for the use of the two 1/2 bed rails. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 300 restricted exiting from the bed, increased risk of injury, increased depression, and entrapment. Findings: Resident 300 admitted to the facility in the fall of 2023 with diagnoses which included brain tumor. During a review of Resident 300's document titled, SIDE RAIL ASSESSMENT, effective date 9/20/23, the contents of the assessment had not been completed. The assessment was blank. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/11/23 at 3:59 p.m., with the Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA 1) 1, in Resident 300's room, PTA 1 confirmed Resident 300 had two half side rails on his bed. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/12/23 at 11:31 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON was asked about the process for placing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist identified an irregularity for an antipsychotic (medication used to treat hallucinations [seeing or hearing things that are not there] and delusions [fixed beliefs with no basis in reality] medication during the monthly drug regimen review for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 32). This failure had the potential for Resident 32 to receive unnecessary medication, or inappropriate medication dosage, which had potential for increased risk and exposure to side effects such as sedation, memory loss, falls and abnormal involuntary movements. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's clinical record, the record indicated that Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included depression, schizophrenia (a mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally), and dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities). During a record review of Resident 32's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 32) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) when Resident 32's antipsychotic was increased without documented clinical rationale and was given in excess for the indication for use. This failure resulted in unnecessary medication for Resident 32, which had the potential for increased risk and exposure of side effects associated with psychotropic medications such as sedation, memory loss, falls and abnormal involuntary movements. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's clinical record, the record indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included depression, schizophrenia (a mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally), and dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities). During a record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food of appropriate nutritive content was provided for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 29), when the resident did not receive and consume food as prescribed by the physician. This failure had the potential to result in the resident not attaining the treatment and plan of care in accordance with his goals and preferences. Findings: Resident 29 was admitted in late 2023 with diagnoses which included altered mental status, weakness, repeated falls, depression, and diabetes (abnormal blood sugar levels). During a review of Resident 29's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 29 had memory impairment and had no swallowing problems. During a review of Resident 29's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 8/11/23 and revised 10/6/23, the NCP indicated, [Resident 29] at risk for altered nutritional status R/T [related to] .feeling hungry between meals, requesting more food .Diet as ordered-Double protein portions with meals. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was working for two of 21 sampled residents (Resident 10 and Resident 43), when the residents' call light button devices did not work. This failure had the potential to result in the residents not being able to ask staff for assistance. Findings: During a review of the facility's Work History Report (WHR) for 9/23, the WHR indicated, Nurse Call System Test: Conduct a test of the nurse call system .Marked done on-time .on 9/5/23. During a review of the facility's Maintenance Request Log (MRL) for 9/12/23 to 10/10/23, the MRL indicated a call light device repair request on 10/9/23. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/9/23 at 8:57 a.m., Resident 10 and Resident 43 were both in bed having breakfast, both awake and alert and both verbally responsive. Resident 10 stated, These call lights, these things don't work .I turn it on and they don't respond. Resident 43 joined the conversation, and stated, [Resident 10] is right. I have turned on this call light, but I guess it is broken .I have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, functional and comfortable homelike environment for three of 21 sample residents (Resident 32, Resident 10 and Resident 43), when: 1. Several items including loose pieces of metal panels, metal boxes and large framed paintings, and a meal tray not picked up for two days, were found in Resident 32's room; 2. The call light device was broken and not working in Resident 10 and Resident 43's room; These failures had the potential to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 32 was admitted in the middle of 2023 with diagnoses which included memory impairment, infection, bone fracture, difficulty walking, and depression. During a review of Resident 32's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 32 had severe memory impairment and needed moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide safety and supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the resident walked out of the building, seen and not prevented by staff, and was found unattended and unsupervised four blocks away from the facility. This failure had the potential to result in accidents, falls and injury. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted in the middle of 2023 with diagnoses which included stroke, altered mental status (change in mental functioning), dementia (cognitive/memory impairment), and difficulty walking. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 7/17/23, the OSR indicated, [Resident 1] (DOES NOT) have the capacity to understand choices and make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 8/16/23, the NCP indicated, Cognitive Loss R/T [related to] .Dementia Manifested by: Compromised short term memory .Compromised Long term memory Impaired capacity to make decisions .Keep environment free of hazards. During a review of Resident 1's NCP,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition when one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) had a call light (a device used to request assistance from facility staff) that did not light outside of the room indicating Resident 1 was calling for help. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's needs not being met and to negatively impact his physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in the summer of 2023 with diagnoses that included fracture of the neck (broken neck) and difficulty in walking. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/21/23 at 2 p.m. with Resident 1, outside of his room, Resident 1 stated the light above the door did not go on when Resident 1 pushed the call light at the bedside. Resident 1 went on to say it has been like this for several days. The call light at the bedside was pushed and the light above the door outside Resident 1's room did not come on. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/21/23 at 2:22 p.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CYPRESS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CYPRESS HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/24/2023
ARMAAN, FNUIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/24/2023
JACKSON, MATTHEWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/24/2023
JACKSON, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/24/2023
SANOFSKY, JACKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/24/2023
CHEEMA, CHANDANDEEPIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
COSTELLO, DANIELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/09/2024
FRAMO, FELIPEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/04/2024
MALA, SANDHYAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/25/2024
SINGSON, RAMONIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/15/2024
SMITH, KIMBERLEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/24/2023
WHITE, ZEKAIAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/15/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-87.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$295K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 2%Other / private 42%

This home reported $295K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$549per resident / day
operating cost
$16,703per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$294per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555542. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next