Ceres Postacute Care
1711 Richland Avenue, Ceres, CA 95307 · For profit - Corporation · 46 certified beds · (209) 537-4581 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 39.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.7% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.83 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.30 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 43.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.19 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses assessed and provided interventions in accordance with professional standards of practice as outlined in the comprehensive care plan for one of four residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 did not receive a complete and accurate initial wound assessment on readmission [DATE]) and did not have weekly wound monitoring, assessments and wound measurements for Resident 1's left inner ankle (wound #8) and right outer ankle (wound #9) from 4/25/2024 to 5/9/2024 and licensed nurses did not assess, measure and notify a physician of changes to wound #8 and wound #9 from 5/9/2024 to 6/27/2024. These failures resulted in an avoidable necrotic (death of cells or tissue through disease or injury) wounds to Resident 1's lower extremities which included Resident 1's left inner ankle (wound #8) and right outer ankle (wound #9) wounds; and resulted in an admission to a general acute care hospital (GACH) on 7/14/2024 for sepsis (a serious condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when Resident 1 did not receive a complete and accurate initial wound assessment on readmission [DATE]) and did not have weekly wound monitoring, assessments and wound measurements for Resident 1's left inner ankle (wound #8) and right outer ankle (wound #9) from 4/25/2024 to 5/9/2024 and licensed nurses did not assess, measure and notify a physician of changes to wound #8 and wound #9 from 5/9/2024 to 6/27/2024. And Resident 1 did not have a comprehensive person-centered care plan (an individual summary of a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) for wounds #8 and #9. These failures resulted in no individual care plan for the avoidable necrotic (death of cells or tissue through disease or injury) wounds to Resident 1's lower extremities which included Resident 1's left inner ankle (wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Physical Therapy (PT - a healthcare specialty that aims to improve and restore physical function, reduce pain, and prevent future injuries) treatment and services to increase range of motion (the full movement potential of a joint to flex and extend in any direction) and mobility (the ability to move, change, or control their body position independently and comfortably) to prevent further decrease in range of motion and mobility for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was not provided PT treatment and services on 4/13/26, 4/14/26, and 4/15/26.This failure had the potential to result in further decrease in range of motion and mobility by reducing Resident 1's ability to walk or perform activities of daily living (dressing, toileting, bathing, feeding, and transferring) independently. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/28/26 at 11:22 a.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was sitting up in bed. Resident 1 was alert and oriented to self, place, and time.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0844 — isolatedFollow rules about disclosure of ownership requirements and tell the state agency about changes in ownership and/or administrative personnel.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the required State Agency (SA) within ten (10) days when there was a Change in Administrator (CHOA) on 11/13/2023. This failure had the potential for the facility information to not be up to date and had the potential for the old Administrator (ADM) to receive communication from the SA that was intended for the current ADM. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/2/2025 at 12:33 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the facility's organizational chart, undated was reviewed. The organizational chart indicated that ADM 1 was the administrator. The DON stated ADM 1 had been the ADM since she assumed position as the DON in May 2025. The DON stated she was aware he was the ADM two years ago when she was a Licensed Nurse (LN) at a sister facility.During an interview on 12/2/2025 at 12:51 p.m. with the Medical Records Director (MRD), the MRD stated she had worked at the facility for 3 years. The MRD stated ADM 1 had been at the facility as the ADM for over 2 years. The MRD stated staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the results of the most recent survey in a place readily accessible for 41 of 41 residents, families, and their legal representatives. This failure had the potential to violate the rights of residents and their representatives to be informed of previous survey deficiencies. Findings: During an observation on 5/12/25 at 10:35 a.m., the facility's survey binder was located in a holder on the wall, next to the main entrance in the facility. The binder did not contain recertification results for the facility's last survey on 5/23/24. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/16/25 at 9:01 a.m. with the Senior [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (SCO) and the Administrator (ADM), the facility's Survey Results binder, undated was reviewed. The SCO stated the previous years survey results were not included in the Survey Results binder. The ADM stated the previous year's survey results were not included in the binder. The ADM stated a staff member took out the survey results and never returned it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for three of the eight (Residents 1, 2 and 14) sampled residents when: 1. The facility's written policies and procedures (P&P) for infection prevention and control program (IPCP) did not include the list of communicable diseases (infectious illnesses that spreads from one person to another or from surface to a person), when and to whom possible incidents of communicable disease or infections should be reported, and COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019 -an illness caused by a virus) infection prevention and control was not updated. These failures had potential risk in the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for all residents. 2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE- specialized clothing, equipment, and supplies worn by healthcare workers protect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure cold food storage was stored under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when refrigerator A was observed at 42 degrees Fahrenheit (F) (unit of measure for temperature) which was above the recommended safe temperature range of 32 to 40 degree F for cold food storage. This failure had the potential to contribute to the growth of foodborne pathogens (a tiny organism, like a germ, that could cause disease. Pathogens included things like bacteria, viruses and fungi) and posed a risk of foodborne illness (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) symptoms which could range from nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, fever, headache, and confusion to residents who received meals and nourishment from refrigerator A. During an observation on 5/12/25 at 10:18 a.m. in the kitchen, during the initial tour the temperature of refrigerator A measured at 42 degrees F. During an observation on 5/13/25 at 8:28 a.m. in the kitchen, refrigerator A's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of assessments for one of one sampled residents (Resident 10) when they did not accurately assess the condition of an area of excoriation (injury to the skin caused by scratching or wearing away the surface) on Resident 10's left buttock. This failure to assess Resident 10's left buttock resulted in an inability to monitor the progression of the condition- and determine if it was improved or had worsened. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (AR-a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences and wishes), dated 1/09/25, the AR indicated Resident 10 has a history of hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg and trunk on the same side of the body), diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control) and failure to thrive (a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments). During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS-resident assessment tool which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered care plans for two of five sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 9) when: 1. Resident 5 who was dependent on a wireless call light system, did not have one accessible. This failure had the potential to result in unmet personal care needs, inconsistent care and compromised dignity and safety for Resident 5; 2. Resident 9 who had been refusing snacks and meal alternatives and was on meal monitoring due to weight loss did not reciece supplimental snacks or meal alternatives. This failure had the potential to result in continued or worsening weight loss, compromised quality of life and failure to meet therapeutic goals. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 2/7/25 , the AR indicated Resident 5 had the following diagnoses: Dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), muscle weakness, and bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a fall care plan for one of four sampled residents (Resident 24) when, Resident 24 had a fall on 1/3/25, a post fall assessment recommended interventions to monitor proper wearing of shoes when up walking with a front wheeled walker (FWW) and Resident 24's care plan interventions indicated for him to wear nonskid socks when up walking with a FWW. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 24 not receiving the care and services from nursing staff and the potential for subsequent falls and injury. Findings: During observation on 5/12/25 at 10:28 a.m. with Resident 24, by the door of Resident 24's room, Resident 24 was self-ambulating with the use of a walker, with upper body bending forward and both arms extended pushing the walker in front of him. Resident 24 was wearing shoes to both feet with regular socks. Resident 24 was heading towards the dining room. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/12/25 at 4:20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality by not following facility's policy and procedure (P&P) for Administering Medications for two of nine sampled residents (Residents 1 and 3) when, 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 and LVN 3 used one resident identifier (name, date of birth , photograph, wrist band [containing resident information of name and date of birth for proper resident identification], and staff verification) before medication administration for Resident 1 and Resident 3. This failure had the potential for medication errors and negative drug interactions (occur when the effects of one drug are altered by another drug that can lead to decreased effectiveness of medication) for Residents 1 and Resident 3. 2. LVN 1 signed (documented medication was administered) Resident 1's Electronic Medication Administration Records (EMAR -an electronic daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains free of accident hazards (a danger or risks) as possible for one of four sampled residents (Resident 31) when, Resident 31's room was cluttered (filled with disorganized items, making it difficult to move around and find things) with multiple boxes at the back of Resident 31's room blocking the door from opening fully and the carpet on the floor had curled edges. These failures placed Resident 31 at risk for an avoidable accident including falling and fall related injuries. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/12/25 at 11:30 a.m. with Resident 31, in Resident 31's room, Resident 31 was lying in bed facing the door, watching a movie on his personal computer. Resident 31 stated he had been at the facility for eight months and came from an acute care hospital. Resident 31 was alert and oriented times 4 (indicating correct awareness of person, places, time and event). Resident 31…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a staff member was aware of their job duties when Restorative Nurse Aide (RNA) 1 did not have a signed job description prior to her working as an RNA. This failure had the potential to cause RNA 1 to be unaware of her job duties. Findings: During an interview on 5/14/25 at 1:35 p.m. with RNA 1, RNA 1 stated she had transitioned from being a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to an RNA three months ago. RNA 1 stated she did not recall signing a job description for her new role. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Director of Staff Development RNA 1's Employee Files, undated, were reviewed. The DSD stated she could not find a signed job description for RNA 1. The DSD stated whenever a staff member gets a new role, like going from a CNA to and RNA, they should have signed a job description going over their new duties otherwise they may not be fully aware of their responsibilities. During an interview on 5/15/25 at 4:11 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated RNA 1 should have signed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for one of six sampled residents (Resident 19) when Resident 19 was administered oxycodone hydrochloride (medication used to treat intense pain) without adequate monitoring. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 19 to experience side effects such as constipation, decreased respirations, dizziness, and increased fall risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 5/15/25, the AR indicated, Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic pain syndrome (condition that causes pain which does not easily go away). During an interview on 5/12/24 at 10:30 a.m. with Resident 19, Resident 19 stated he had had a diagnosis of chronic pain which he needed to take oxycodone hydrochloride…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent when the facility's medication error rate was 5.88 % percent. There were 34 opportunities for errors and two medication errors occurred for two of nine sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when: 1. Resident 2 did not receive the inhaler medication Salbutamol (medication used to treat asthma (a condition in which person's airways become inflame, narrow , and swell, and produce extra mucus, which makes it difficult to breathe) and exercise-induced bronchospasm (a life-threatening emergency that occurs when the muscles surrounding the lungs' small airways tighten, narrowing the airways) at the prescribed time of administration of 8:00 a.m. on 5/14/25. 2. Resident 1 did not receive the eye drops medication (Lubricant eye drops Ophthalmic [relating to or representing the eye] Solution 0.5% at the prescribed time of administration of 7:00 a.m. on 5/14/25. These failures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the results of the most recent abbreviated survey document titled, Statement of Deficiencies in a place readily accessible to residents and their representatives. This failure had the potential to violate the rights of the residents and their representatives to be informed of abbreviated survey deficiencies and the facility's plan of correction. Findings: During an observation on 5/21/24 at 9:20 a.m., a binder labeled Survey Inspection was located in a holder on the wall in the main entrance. The binder contained the 2019 health recertification survey deficiencies and plan of corrections and previous years abbreviated surveys. There were no abbreviated survey documents available from 2020 to 2024. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/21/24 at 11:05 a.m., with the Administrator (ADM), a document titled, Survey Inspections, undated was reviewed. The ADM stated, the binder contained the 2019 health recertification survey deficiencies and plan of corrections and previous years abbreviated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have an air gap (an unobstructed vertical space between the water outlet and the flood level of a fixture), under the food preparation sink. This failure had the potential to result in 36 of 36 residents being exposed to contaminated water (when substances pollute the water and make it unusable for cooking and drinking) which could ultimately result in food born illness from eating contaminated food. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), on 5/20/24 at 8:52 p.m., at the food prep sink in the facilities kitchen, the CDM validated that there was not an air gap under the food prep sink. The CDM stated she does not know why there is not an air gap under the food prep sink. The CDM stated there should be an air gap under the sink so that the water does not back up into the sink. The CDM stated that maintenance would be the person responsible for making sure there is an air gap. During an interview on 5/20/24 at 9:43 p.m., with Maintenance Staff (MAINS), MAINS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to cover one of one outside trash bin with a lid. This failure had the potential to harbor and feed pests. This failure had the potential for an infestation of pests which could lead to unsanitary conditions and the spread of disease. Findings: During an observation on 5/22/24 at 2:01 p.m. in the parking lot of the facility, the trash bin was uncovered, the lid was open and hanging on the back of the bin. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/22/24 at 3:47 p.m. with Maintenance Staff (MAINS), MAINS validated the lid of trash bin was open MAINS stated, . the lid on the trash should always be closed to prevent rodents and insects . During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Waste Disposal dated 1/2018, indicated, .1. All .waste destined for disposal shall be placed in closeable leak proof containers .b. Disposal of all . waste shall be in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations .
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe clean comfortable homelike environment was provided for four of 21 residents when: 1.One third of the floor in Resident 10, 18, 19, and 26's rooms had yellow and brown stains. This failure resulted in Residents 10, 18, 19 and 26 not being provided a clean comfortable homelike environment. 2. In Resident 6 and Resident 23 room red tape was used to attach the call light cord to the call light socket. This failure resulted in a potenial fire hazard and Resident 6 and 20 not being provided a safe, comfortable homelike environment. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool which indicates physical and cognitive abilities), dated 4/1/24, the MDS indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-an assessment of cognitive function) score of nine (0-7 severe cognitive impairment, 8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, 13-15 no cognitive impairment), indicating Resident 10 had moderate cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 18's MDS, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans (CP - a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's needs) for four of 13 sampled residents (Residents 4, 18, 30, and 138) when Residents 4 and 138 did not have an individualized care plan developed and implemented for the use of side rails. This failure had the potential for Residents 4 and 138 to be injured while using the side rails. Findings: During a review of Resident 138's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 5/21/24, the AR indicated, Resident 138 was admitted from home on 5/13/24 to the facility, with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- is a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow of the lungs), Heart Failure (weakness in the heart where fluid accumulates in the lungs), Anxiety (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when one of four sampled residents' (Resident 1) oxygen concentrator (a device that concentrates the oxygen from the ambient air) filters were found covered with lint and dust. This failure placed Resident 1 at an increased risk to develop respiratory and healthcare-associated infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR, a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 5/21/24, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted from an acute care hospital on 3/21/24 to the facility, with diagnoses which included Myocardial Infarction (heart attack), Hypertension (high blood pressure), Anxiety Disorder (a mental health illness characterized by a sudden feeling of panic and fear, restlessness, and uneasiness), and Morbid Obesity (overweight). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool which indicates physical, medical, and cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity when staff spoke with each other in a foreign language not understood or spoken by three of four sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3). This failure made Residents 1, 2 and 3 feel uncomfortable and believed staff spoke about them in a language they did not understand and Resident 3 felt disrespected when staff spoke in a language she did not understand. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/29/24 at 10:29 a.m. with Resident 1, in Resident 1 ' s room, Resident 1 was lying in bed. Resident 1 stated he heard staff speak a foreign language to each other in the facility. Resident 1 stated it made him feel like they were talking about him when they spoke in a foreign language. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function) Assessment dated 10/5/23, indicated Resident 1's Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the chemical sanitizing solution used for dishes, utensils and kitchen working surfaces met the recommended sanitation concentration when expired chemical test strips were used. This practice failed to ensure the required level of sanitation was followed and placed the residents and staff of the facility at risk for food borne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with [NAME] 1, on 6/3/19, at 8:15 a.m., [NAME] 1 took a test strip to test the sanitizing solution in a red bucket. [NAME] 1 stated the solution in the red bucket was used to sanitize the countertops of the kitchen. The Quaternary Sanitizer (a form of disinfectant) (QT) test strip used by [NAME] 1 indicated an expiration date of 2/2019. During a concurrent observation and interview with [NAME] 1, on 6/3/19, at 8:20 a.m., [NAME] 1 took the chlorine test paper to verify the sanitation solution for the dishwasher. The container for the chlorine test paper indicated an expiration date of 5/19. [NAME] 1 stated the test…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-06-07 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a facility wide assessment specific to the facility needs when the facility assessment did not include a water management plan. This practice failed to establish an individualized facility assessment to meet the requirement for a water management plan which had the potential for waterborne bacteria exposure to the residents including Legionella (disease is a severe form of pneumonia - lung inflammation usually caused by infection, caused by bacterium known as legionella, most people get legionnaires' disease from inhaling the bacteria in showers, water faucets, water fountain) in an event of an outbreak. Findings: During an interview with the Administrator (ADM), on 6/5/19, at 9:30 a.m., he stated he was aware of the facility's requirement to establish a water management plan issued by the Centers of Medicare and Medical Services (CMS) in September 17, 2018. The ADM stated the requirement indicated all healthcare facilities were required to develop a plan for water management in an effort to reduce the risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-06-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that had a data driven approach to maintain safety and quality when the facility's QAPI program did not develop and implement a water management program as part of the infection Control Program. These failure resulted in the facility not having a program in place to reduce the risk of waterborne illnesses including Legionella (a severe form of pneumonia) (lung inflammation usually caused by infection, caused by a bacterrium known as legionella, most people get legionnaires'disease from inhaling the bacteria in showers, water faucets, water fountain). Findings: During an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), on 6/5/19, at 9:15 a.m., the MS stated he was not aware of the water management plan for Legionella and did not know what Legionella was. During a concurrent interview and facility document review with the Administrator (ADM), on 6/6/19, at 11 a.m., he stated he was aware of the facility's requirement to establish a water management…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when: 1. The facility water management plan was not created or implemented to reduce the risk of Legionella (waterborne bacteria which can cause life threatening pneumonia) (a lung infection) and other waterborne pathogens (germs that cause disease) in accordance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). These failures placed the residents at risk for cross contamination, infection and had the potential for not identifying the risk of waterborne illnesses such as Legionella. 2. The Infection Surveillance Logs (to track residents with infections) was not completed in accordance with the facility policy and procedure titled, Infection Control Plan. These failures had the potential to result in an ineffective infection surveillance program which could potentially lead to undetected infection outbreaks, unnecessary antibiotic use and place residents at risk to develop antibiotic resistance. Findings: 1. During an interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with comfortable sound levels for three of three sampled residents (Resident 15, 13 and 20) when: Resident 17's television (TV) sound was so loud, it was heard in the hallways and adjacent rooms and disrupted Resident 15,13 and 20. This failure violated the residents' rights to a comfortable and homelike environment that would respect the residents' dignity, privacy and well-being. Findings: During an observation in the facility hallway on 6/3/19, at 9:30 a.m., a very high volume of sound came from a TV inside Resident 17's room. Resident 15 who tried to form words to speak was unable to (non-verbal) do so. She immediately signaled and pointed to her ears and Resident 17's TV. Resident 17 held her TV remote control while she watched the TV show in a loud volume. During an interview with Resident 17, on 6/3/19, at 11 a.m., in her room. Resident 17 stated she could not hear well, which caused her to increase the TV volume. Resident 17 stated the staff knew she could not hear well…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-07 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) (an assessment of memory, recall and functional abilities) assessment accurately reflected the residents functional status for three of three sampled residents (Resident 17, 30 and 33) when: 1. Resident 17's hard of hearing status was not coded in the MDS assessment. 2. Resident 30's dialysis (filters a patient's blood to remove excess water and waste products when the kidneys are damaged, dysfunctional, or missing) treatment was not coded in the MDS assessment. 3. Resident 33 ate by mouth and the MDS assessment coding indicated nasogastric feeding or percutaneous endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG-tube) (tube inserted by was of the nose or stomach for administration of nutrition, fluids and/or medications) instead. These failures had the potential for the residents' needs to be unmet. Findings: During an observation on 6/3/19, at 9:30 a.m., the TV volume inside Resident 17's room was heard from the hallway outside of her room. During an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize their policy and procedure to investigate abuse when the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator (ADM) did not conduct an investigation after one of three sampled residents (Resident 23) engaged in disruptive yelling and abusive verbal behavior toward Resident's 13 and 26. This failure resulted in the missed opportunity to provide Resident 13 and Resident 26 emotional support and counseling during and after the investigation, as needed. This failure had the potential for all allegations of abuse to continue. Findings: During a telephone interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3, on 6/4/19, at 8:08 a.m., she stated she was on duty on 5/23/19, at 10 p.m. and assigned to a 1:1 (a caregiver assigned to one resident only) with Resident 23. CNA 3 stated Resident 23 had been restless and agitated and therefore required the 1:1 to keep him safe. CNA 3 stated Resident 23 woke up got out of bed on the night shift of 5/23/19. CNA 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the abuse prohibition policy and procedure for two of two residents (Resident 26 and 13) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3, CNA 4, CNA 5, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), Director of Staff Development (DSD), Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator (ADM) failed to report an incident of verbal abuse from Resident 23 toward Resident 26 and 13 in accordance with the State law. These failures subjected the staff and the residents' safety at risk and had the potential for these incidents to continue endangering the well-being of the residents. Findings: During a telephone interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3, on 6/4/19, at 8:08 a.m., she stated she was on duty on 5/23/19, at 10 p.m. and assigned to a 1:1 (a caregiver assigned to one resident only) with Resident 23. CNA 3 stated Resident 23 had been restless and agitated and therefore required the 1:1 to keep him safe. CNA 3 stated Resident 23 woke up got out of bed on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted in gaining access to hearing services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 17). This failure resulted in not meeting Resident 17's functional hearing needs necessary to improve her quality of life. Findings: During an observation on 6/3/19, at 9:30 a.m., the TV volume inside Resident 17's room was heard from the hallway outside of her room. During an interview with Resident 17, on 6/3/19, at 11 a.m., in her room. Resident 17 stated she could not hear well, which caused her to increase the TV volume. Resident 17 stated the staff knew she could not hear well and needed the TV volume to be loud enough for her to hear. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Social Service Director (SSD), on 6/6/19, at 3 p.m., she was unable to find documented evidence of a hearing consult scheduled for Resident 17. The SSD stated Resident 17's hearing needs were not met and should have been followed up by scheduling a consultation with an audiologist. The facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sample residents (Resident 27) received routine dental care when a follow-up with dental recommendations for Resident 27 to have an upper partial denture fitting was not done. This failure resulted in Resident 27 feeling embarrassed and inability to eat regular textured food. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 27, on 6/3/19, at 9:45 a.m., Resident 27 had no front upper teeth and interfered with her speech. Resident 27 stated she had a partial upper denture before and had lost it. During an observation and interview of Resident 27, on 6/6/19, at 4:45 p.m., Resident 27 stated she would be able to eat regular food and would be able to smile if she had a new denture plate. Resident 27 stated she was known for her smile and felt embarrassed to smile. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 27's, the dental notes dated 5/13/19, indicated Resident 27 had under gone a dental evaluation with X-ray. The recommendation indicated a referral to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of three sampled residents (Resident 21) with eating equipment necessary to facilitate drinking and reduce fluid spillage when two nosey cups (designed with a cut out on the non-drinking side enabling tilting without interference by the nose) were not included in Resident 21's lunch tray. This failure had the potential for Resident 21's fluids to spill and difficulty to drink fluids. Findings: During a lunch observation of Resident 21, on 6/3/19, at 11:50 a.m., Resident 21 lunch tray consisted of a pureed diet served in separate bowls, one four ounce (oz) glass of juice and one four oz glass of water. Resident 21 ate her pureed food from the separate bowls while a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 supervised. Resident 21's meal ticket indicated, Serve food in bowls and 2 nosey cups. During an interview with CNA 1 and CNA 2, on 6/3/19, at 12 p.m., both CNA's stated Resident 21's lunch tray should have included 2 nosey cups for Resident 21's use. CNA 2 stated anyone of them could have transferred…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to assure full visual privacy for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 7) when Resident's 7's cubicle curtain (material suspended from the ceiling to circle around the bed to provide privacy during resident personal care) was removed and not replaced. This failure had the potential for Resident 7 to receive personal care with out being afforded privacy. Findings: During a medication pass observation and interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN ) 2 on 6/4/19, at 8:30 a.m., LVN 2 tried to pull the curtain from the middle of the room. The curtain did not provide full circle privacy around Resident 7's bed. LVN 2 stated Resident 7 could not speak. LVN 2 stated the privacy curtain was missing for Resident 7. LVN 2 stated the hooks for the curtains were hanging in the curtain rail and the housekeepers were responsible for the replacement of the privacy curtain after their removal. During an interview with the Housekeeper/Laundry staff, on 6/5/19, at 4:17 p.m., stated she was responsible to check privacy curtains were in place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview during the survey period of 5/12/25 to 5/16/25, the facility failed to provide the minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple residents rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18), when the amount of usable living space was not adequate for residents. This failure had the potential for residents in Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12,13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 to not have reasonable privacy or adequate space. Findings: During an environmental tour with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) and Maintenance Assistant (MA), on 05/15/25 11:09 a.m., the inspection indicated the following rooms did not meet the minimum square footage as required by regulation. However, variations were in accordance with the particular needs of the residents. The residents had a reasonable amount of privacy. Closets and storage space were adequate. Bedside stands were available. There was sufficient room for nursing care and for residents to ambulate. Wheelchairs and toilet facilities were accessible. The waiver will not adversely affect the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview during the survey period of 5/20/24 to 5/23/24, the facility failed to provide the minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple residents rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18), when the amount of usable living space was not adequate for residents. This failure had the potential for residents in Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 to not have reasonable privacy or adequate space. Findings: During an environmental tour with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) and Administrator (ADM), on 5/23/24, at 10:16 a.m., the inspection indicated the following rooms did not meet the minimum square footage as required by regulation. However, variations were in accordance with the particular needs of the residents. The residents had a reasonable amount of privacy. Closets and storage space were adequate. Bedside stands were available. There was sufficient room for nursing care and for residents to ambulate. Wheelchairs and toilet facilities were accessible. The waiver will not adversely affect the health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, during the annual recertifiction survey period of 6/3/19 to 6/7/19, the facility failed to provide the minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple residents rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18). This failure had the potential for residents to not have reasonable privacy or adequate space. Findings: During an environmental tour with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), on 6/5/19, at 10:30 a.m., the inspection indicated the following rooms did not meet the minimum square footage as required by regulation. However, variations were in accordance with the particular needs of the residents. The residents had a reasonable amount of privacy. Closets and storage space were adequate. Bedside stands were available. There was sufficient room for nursing care and for residents to ambulate. Wheelchairs and toilet facilities were accessible. The waiver will not adversely affect the health and safety of residents. These rooms were as follows: Room number (#) Square feet #Residents 1 140 2 2 140 2 3 140 2 4 140 2 5 210 3 6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RMG CAPITAL PARTNERS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMG CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/2019 |
| BANSAL, JAGAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 50% | since 03/30/2015 |
| BANSAL, MANEESH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 50% | since 03/30/2015 |
| RELIANT MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $635K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055935. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.